[Return]
Posting mode: Reply
Name
E-mail
Subject
Comment
File
Password(Password used for file deletion)
  • Supported file types are: GIF, JPG, PNG
  • Maximum file size allowed is 3072 KB.
  • Images greater than 250x250 pixels will be thumbnailed.
  • Read the rules and FAQ before posting.
  • ????????? - ??


  • File : 1269562620.jpg-(239 KB, 1280x866, 1583504.jpg)
    239 KB Jet Fighters, Mercenaries, and Napalm! XVI OP again 03/25/10(Thu)20:17 No.8787569  
    Just got back, writing it up now, i took notes so hopefully i'll remember most of what happened.
    >> Anonymous 03/25/10(Thu)20:18 No.8787609
    Yeeessssssss!
    >> Anonymous 03/25/10(Thu)20:18 No.8787611
         File1269562708.jpg-(38 KB, 329x445, 1269218526399.jpg)
    38 KB
    For those confused:
    http://suptg.thisisnotatrueending.com/archive/8515581
    http://suptg.thisisnotatrueending.com/archive/8526381
    http://suptg.thisisnotatrueending.com/archive/8538520
    http://suptg.thisisnotatrueending.com/archive/8562185
    http://suptg.thisisnotatrueending.com/archive/8598508
    http://suptg.thisisnotatrueending.com/archive/8606900
    http://suptg.thisisnotatrueending.com/archive/8618962
    http://suptg.thisisnotatrueending.com/archive/8633908
    http://suptg.thisisnotatrueending.com/archive/8651744
    http://suptg.thisisnotatrueending.com/archive/8663665
    http://suptg.thisisnotatrueending.com/archive/8671001
    http://suptg.thisisnotatrueending.com/archive/8690201
    http://suptg.thisisnotatrueending.com/archive/8711026
    http://suptg.thisisnotatrueending.com/archive/8750800
    http://suptg.thisisnotatrueending.com/archive/8764141
    TL:DR: Mercenary Air RPG (Area 88) in Africa, GM is a God, Missions are Fuck Brilliant, Execution of Missions is Barrel of Monkeys Fun. Planefaggotry is everywhere.
    >> Anonymous 03/25/10(Thu)20:18 No.8787613
    >>8787569
    Ooooh man, dat landing gear... I want her to trample my dick ;_;
    >> Anonymous 03/25/10(Thu)20:18 No.8787619
    eeeeexcellent.
    >> planefag 03/25/10(Thu)20:23 No.8787669
    THANK GOD

    /tg/ IS OVER-RUN BY FUCKING MORONIC BULLSHIT, BUT REINFORCEMENTS HAVE ARRIVED
    >> Anonymous 03/25/10(Thu)20:23 No.8787673
         File1269562992.jpg-(220 KB, 826x819, tgnotsuck.jpg)
    220 KB
    First thread I see on refresh.

    Pic is how i feel.
    >> Anonymous 03/25/10(Thu)20:24 No.8787709
         File1269563092.jpg-(14 KB, 363x310, emote 1269120355292.jpg)
    14 KB
    You spoil me, OP.
    >> Anonymous 03/25/10(Thu)20:27 No.8787742
    >>8787673
    Fucking saved.
    >> Anonymous 03/25/10(Thu)20:28 No.8787754
         File1269563313.gif-(7 KB, 200x480, shut_up_commie.gif)
    7 KB
    >>8787613

    ZOMBIE LINCON DISSAPROVES
    >> Anonymous 03/25/10(Thu)20:30 No.8787779
    >>8787569
    Did everyone make it out?
    >> Anonymous 03/25/10(Thu)20:33 No.8787804
    >>8787779
    Read that as "did everyone make out"
    Now I badly want some plane fapfiction.
    Thanks a lot.
    >> planefag 03/25/10(Thu)20:34 No.8787819
    >>8787804

    >plane fapfiction

    Why do you put these ideas in my head?

    Why the fuck do you do it?
    >> Anonymous 03/25/10(Thu)20:34 No.8787824
    >>8787819
    Because I care.
    >> Anonymous 03/25/10(Thu)20:35 No.8787832
    >>8787804
    Wait for sukhoi to show up to this thread.
    >> Anonymous 03/25/10(Thu)20:38 No.8787874
         File1269563917.jpg-(364 KB, 611x480, DAAAAYUM.jpg)
    364 KB
    LIBERIANS CAN'T CATCH YOU IF YOU'RE ON FIRE!
    >> Anonymous 03/25/10(Thu)20:45 No.8787969
         File1269564327.jpg-(18 KB, 120x150, givewarachancecw4.jpg)
    18 KB
    HOLDIN' OUT FOR AN OP
    >> Anonymous 03/25/10(Thu)20:52 No.8788086
    >>8787969
    I like this pic.
    >> Anonymous 03/25/10(Thu)20:52 No.8788092
    OP again

    Steve started by asking us all if we understood what we needed to do, as always. We then picked our gear. Hugs didn't have anything to do, since he was already loaded. I took 4 AMRAAMs and 4 AIM-9s, as did Biscuit. Scotch took 6 AIM-9s. We had asked around prior to the flight, and found out the base had no anti-air guns, they had been packed away already. We had also talked about alternates, and figured that if needed, an escape to Angola would be our best bet if we couldn't make it to the refueler or Kisangani. We talked to the weather briefer, and he told us we could expect an overcast at 9000 ft, so that might be an issue. The cloud layer was thick, extending 3000 or so ft higher, and there was drizzle in some areas, outright rain in others, the beginning of a storm system that was developing. We still had no idea where the fleet was as circled above the clouds. We tanked with the Midas, which then began proceeding to the rendezvous point. We were told that the final personnel were now on their way to the waiting aircraft.
    >> Anonymous 03/25/10(Thu)20:56 No.8788157
    >>8788092

    Yes. Either way.. this shall be a battle they sing songs about!
    >> Anonymous 03/25/10(Thu)20:57 No.8788175
         File1269565058.jpg-(61 KB, 640x419, saigon.jpg)
    61 KB
    >>8788092
    I get the feeling that this is what it was like below those clouds...
    >> Anonymous 03/25/10(Thu)20:58 No.8788189
         File1269565110.jpg-(215 KB, 550x600, 1253489961452.jpg)
    215 KB
    >>8788092

    Eye of the Tiger- playing.

    Vodka- prepared.

    EPIC ASSKICKING- INCOMING
    >> Anonymous 03/25/10(Thu)21:04 No.8788291
         File1269565488.jpg-(2.12 MB, 2461x1526, Lockheed_Martin_F-22A_Raptor_J(...).jpg)
    2.12 MB
    The British know what you did. Which means the U.N. knows what you did. I have a feeling Steve is going to OUT OF NOWHERE FUCKING RAPTORS you guys.

    Of course the Limeys may just try and rush you with their harriers. Are Typhoon's carrier capable?
    >> Anonymous 03/25/10(Thu)21:07 No.8788342
    >>8788291
    No, Brits use Harrier GR9's from their carriers
    >> Anonymous 03/25/10(Thu)21:08 No.8788355
    >>8788291
    The UN? I'd be concerned about the Brits. The UN would just send a strongly worded letter.
    >> Anonymous 03/25/10(Thu)21:08 No.8788358
    >>8788291

    Best bet is Warsaw Pact or China.
    >> Anonymous 03/25/10(Thu)21:11 No.8788398
    >>8788358
    I was thinking raptors because of that whole HMMWV debacle, maybe the U.S. wanted a piece.

    Though I'm sure the russians wouldn't mind a shot either.

    tl;dr: OP has a lot of people with very large airforces that want them dead.
    >> Anonymous 03/25/10(Thu)21:12 No.8788417
    It is late.

    I should go to bed.

    New Planethread.

    I love you OP.
    >> Anonymous 03/25/10(Thu)21:13 No.8788439
    >>8788355
    I'm retarded, I meant NATO.

    I am full of herp and derp
    >> Anonymous 03/25/10(Thu)21:14 No.8788448
    So tempted to try and get my DM to run this.
    >> Anonymous 03/25/10(Thu)21:16 No.8788470
    god DAMN this is going to be one WILD ride.

    i have that tingling feelings in my pants that indicates Pure Win is about to happen.

    That or i'm too close to the microwave again.
    >> Anonymous 03/25/10(Thu)21:16 No.8788472
    >>8788448

    So tempted at trying to GM this.

    And trick someone else to do it.
    >> Anonymous 03/25/10(Thu)21:19 No.8788509
         File1269566365.jpg-(18 KB, 500x188, beastofkanharar.jpg)
    18 KB
    Beast of Kandahar was here, the rest of you don't have nearly as cool a name as me.
    >> Anonymous 03/25/10(Thu)21:19 No.8788518
         File1269566399.jpg-(27 KB, 440x292, 3e959cdb-ff52-48a8-a480-b0f0aa(...).jpg)
    27 KB
    >>8788509
    >> Anonymous 03/25/10(Thu)21:23 No.8788562
         File1269566589.jpg-(67 KB, 289x298, 1263143313066.jpg)
    67 KB
    >>8788509
    teh fuck???
    >> Anonymous 03/25/10(Thu)21:23 No.8788569
    Reaver Flight
    >> Anonymous 03/25/10(Thu)21:27 No.8788636
    >>8788562
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RQ-170_Sentinel
    >> Anonymous 03/25/10(Thu)21:28 No.8788651
         File1269566883.gif-(386 KB, 160x120, radar_preview_video.gif)
    386 KB
    OP again
    It was pretty clear to us that the company didn't have a lot of faith in our defensive abilities, since we found out that the Midas and Bird Dog were being escorted by some of Blackwood's Hussars. It was still cool to imagine us tanking on the Midas with its MiG-31 and F-18 escort. We didn't have a chance to find out what was flying with the R-99 because Bird Dog called and told us we had some contacts closing from the Northwest. It was at extreme range for them, so they weren't sure, but their track path was going to put them over the airfield in about 30 minutes. Just three targets, although there were other targets 200 miles from the airfield, although it seemed that our airspace had been sanitized. The company had told us before we launched that the flight plans of major airlines seemed to be filed around our airspace, probably due to interference by the British MoD. We began to talk strategy, when Steve put down additional markers, three more in fact, south and to the west of the original three. Both were headed to Kitona. I joined up with Hugs to investigate the northern group, while Biscuit and Scotch remained over the airfield. We were then told that Bird Dog would begin a withdrawal soon, to keep distance between it and these contacts.
    >> Anonymous 03/25/10(Thu)21:29 No.8788678
    >>8788651

    Aww shit...

    It's beginning.
    >> Anonymous 03/25/10(Thu)21:37 No.8788763
    >>8788651

    Wish I could play in a game like this. All my group ever runs is Dark Heresy.
    >> Anonymous 03/25/10(Thu)21:38 No.8788785
    Has OP named his flight yet? I missed the last thread.
    >> Anonymous 03/25/10(Thu)21:42 No.8788828
         File1269567778.jpg-(31 KB, 756x504, 28 SR-71A 61-7964 left front i(...).jpg)
    31 KB
    >>8788785
    I don't believe they did, no. They might have during this session, though.
    >> Anonymous 03/25/10(Thu)21:43 No.8788838
         File1269567831.jpg-(151 KB, 500x376, it begins.jpg)
    151 KB
    >>8788678
    >> Anonymous 03/25/10(Thu)21:44 No.8788845
    >>8788763
    Aeronautica Imperialis cross over, could be win.
    >> Anonymous 03/25/10(Thu)21:44 No.8788849
         File1269567892.jpg-(80 KB, 800x773, 0_37f90_aa1268c_XL.jpg)
    80 KB
    Posting to keep love alive.
    >> Anonymous 03/25/10(Thu)21:45 No.8788854
    OP again
    As we headed out, we flew in tight formation, talking about strategy. We both had our radars off, still 200 miles from the contacts. We figured that we'd pound on them with our search radars, (well, really, Hugs radar) try to scare them off, maybe force them to reconsider this approach. Since we'd be closer, we were also hoping to find out a bit more about the group then Bird Dog could tell us. Our engagement plan was pretty simple, fire at range, see if we could break the formation. Hugs decided we were close enough, and powered up the big radar on his jet. Steve let us move another phase, and then dropped seven more contact markers on the map where before there had been three. Hugs looked at me, and then said through his “mask” (he always muffled his voice with his hands, which while stupid, sounds cool) “Multiple contacts, on the plus side, we know you're not shooting down an airliner today.” We moved towards the contacts, changing our plan to 'shoot and run'. And then Steve dropped another four markers into the mass flying at us.
    >> Anonymous 03/25/10(Thu)21:46 No.8788870
         File1269567985.jpg-(582 KB, 2200x1663, 20050824008_MAKS_big.jpg)
    582 KB
    >> Anonymous 03/25/10(Thu)21:48 No.8788894
         File1269568090.jpg-(1.18 MB, 3008x1960, 1199842292532.jpg)
    1.18 MB
    >>8788854
    Well, shit.
    >> Anonymous 03/25/10(Thu)21:48 No.8788902
    >>8788854
    The good news is you've got a reputation as some dangerous motherfuckers.

    The bad news is a whole carrier air wing is coming to see just how dangerous you motherfuckers are.
    >> Anonymous 03/25/10(Thu)21:49 No.8788919
         File1269568197.jpg-(58 KB, 780x640, 1266446846437.jpg)
    58 KB
    >>8788902
    Pic tangentially related.
    >> Anonymous 03/25/10(Thu)21:50 No.8788931
         File1269568235.jpg-(30 KB, 500x513, 1214664470771.jpg)
    30 KB
    >> Anonymous 03/25/10(Thu)21:50 No.8788932
         File1269568239.jpg-(53 KB, 500x333, 2294922472_35651e91b0.jpg)
    53 KB
    >>8788854
    Oh christ.
    >> Anonymous 03/25/10(Thu)21:52 No.8788952
         File1269568333.jpg-(808 KB, 1712x2288, Cabinacaza.jpg)
    808 KB
    >> Anonymous 03/25/10(Thu)21:53 No.8788961
         File1269568382.jpg-(1.2 MB, 2197x1465, Ka-52_at_MAKS-2009.jpg)
    1.2 MB
    >> Anonymous 03/25/10(Thu)21:54 No.8788976
         File1269568448.jpg-(145 KB, 1090x1567, KC-135_B-2.jpg)
    145 KB
    >> Anonymous 03/25/10(Thu)21:54 No.8788987
         File1269568498.jpg-(277 KB, 1800x1200, Dark_Star_USAF.jpg)
    277 KB
    >> Air Action Weekly 03/25/10(Thu)21:56 No.8789000
         File1269568567.jpg-(76 KB, 699x593, Kitona.jpg)
    76 KB
    Damn, you ignore /tg/ for a few hours and this.


    Sounds bad OP. Thats what? Over a full squadron?
    >> Air Action Weekly 03/25/10(Thu)21:57 No.8789011
         File1269568629.jpg-(2.7 MB, 3300x1664, HMS_Ark_Royal_(R07).jpg)
    2.7 MB
    >>8788919

    No, this is related. Its the carrier launching the strike on them.
    >> Anonymous 03/25/10(Thu)21:57 No.8789012
    >>8788987
    >>8788976
    >>8788961
    >>8788952
    No pic dumps yet bro, we want the debrief!
    >> Anonymous 03/25/10(Thu)21:57 No.8789015
         File1269568656.jpg-(40 KB, 393x257, 1257713004745.jpg)
    40 KB
    FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF~
    >> Anonymous 03/25/10(Thu)21:58 No.8789033
    >>8789011
    Well, could be worse.
    Could have a squadron of modern flankers closing in on them.
    >> Anonymous 03/25/10(Thu)21:59 No.8789034
         File1269568741.jpg-(127 KB, 449x600, 449px-The_empire_strikes_back_(...).jpg)
    127 KB
    >>8788854
    >and then dropped seven more contact markers on the map where before there had been three.

    Oh dear....
    Pic related.
    its' Ark Royal's sister.
    >> planefag 03/25/10(Thu)22:00 No.8789054
         File1269568812.jpg-(17 KB, 360x250, 1266115303808.jpg)
    17 KB
    >>8788902
    >>8788932

    >implying a target-rich environment is a bad thing
    >> Anonymous 03/25/10(Thu)22:00 No.8789058
    The suspense is killing me
    >> Anonymous 03/25/10(Thu)22:00 No.8789067
         File1269568844.jpg-(1.43 MB, 1600x1200, HMS_Dauntless_Scotstoun.jpg)
    1.43 MB
    >>8789033
    could be much, much worse for them, if this is escorting the Ark Royal.
    >> Anonymous 03/25/10(Thu)22:03 No.8789102
    OP again
    Then things got worse, since a big search radar hit us, and locked on almost immediately. Hugs was shouting something so I dumped chaff and began a hard turn back the way we came. Hugs did the same thing and began to push back towards the base. As Hugs turned, he scored a radar spot on the other group, which was lucky considering his Rwr was going crazy. Steve put three more markers down on the southern group. Just so you realize, we now had 14 contacts in the North, and 6 in the west, all heading towards us. Steve also put down three surface based radar sources, one of them dangerously close to us. We were heading away, and I asked for a book on UK missiles. Another 20 miles and we would have probably been shot to pieces by a destroyer/frigate of some type, that apparently had been hiding/running cold until Hugs blasted his radar openly. We needed a new plan, we were now restricted to certain airspace, since we didn't feel like going up against ships with an itchy trigger finger. We decided to still make a long range strike, but from a bit closer to the airfield. Since we were allready heading back anyway, Scotch and Biscuit turned to join up with us, as we changed our intercept course towards the six aircraft south of us. Bird Dog figured they'd be arriving at Kitona first anyway, and if we took a long range shot, we might be able to take them down cleanly. But right now we wanted to get together to maximize firepower. Steve started to put down another contact, but this time it was flipped over, and coming off the airfield, so we let out a breath. The first transport was off and climbing out.
    >> Anonymous 03/25/10(Thu)22:03 No.8789105
    >>8789054
    You've got to remember that this is a first world air wing, not some third world shit or a terrorist technical, but honest to god professional soldiers that are probably none too happy that OP killed 500 of their countrymen.
    >> Anonymous 03/25/10(Thu)22:04 No.8789120
         File1269569064.jpg-(248 KB, 724x1024, Phantomflares.jpg)
    248 KB
    So it's victory or death! I hope you made those Brits pay for hurting your business.
    >> Air Action Weekly 03/25/10(Thu)22:05 No.8789135
    >>8789034

    If I knew how to photoshop I would change that to "The Congolese Crisis" and "HMS Ark Royal Steams South".
    >> Anonymous 03/25/10(Thu)22:05 No.8789136
    >>8789102
    20 Contacts
    5 mercs
    1 Transport
    0 Hope?

    THIS IS FUCKING EPIC!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    >> Anonymous 03/25/10(Thu)22:05 No.8789137
    >>8789105

    Nah, most were probably German tourists...
    >> Anonymous 03/25/10(Thu)22:05 No.8789144
    >>8789120
    That is awesome art dude! We need drawfags doing shit like that!
    >> Anonymous 03/25/10(Thu)22:07 No.8789168
    >>8789054
    >implying a target-rich environment is a bad thing

    >Implying the Flagship of the Royal Navy's air wing is a walkover like barely-equipped moroccan/3rd world airforces in north african dustholes....
    >> Anonymous 03/25/10(Thu)22:08 No.8789186
         File1269569283.png-(1.81 MB, 800x600, Escort2.png)
    1.81 MB
    >>8789102

    >Steve started to put down another contact, but this time it was flipped over, and coming off the airfield, so we let out a breath. The first transport was off and climbing out.

    THE FIRST TRANSPORT IS AWAY
    >> Anonymous 03/25/10(Thu)22:11 No.8789256
    What ever happened to the model Queen Vic with Realistic Battle Damage™?
    >> Air Action Weekly 03/25/10(Thu)22:12 No.8789268
         File1269569557.jpg-(48 KB, 542x491, thai12.jpg)
    48 KB
    >>8789186

    Yeah, except the mercs don't have a big "Fuck Off!" gun to cover it with.
    >> Anonymous 03/25/10(Thu)22:13 No.8789276
         File1269569583.jpg-(2.98 MB, 2860x1880, MiG-29_and_F-16.jpg)
    2.98 MB
    >> Anonymous 03/25/10(Thu)22:13 No.8789281
         File1269569609.jpg-(54 KB, 200x200, Zemke_mad.jpg)
    54 KB
    >>8789168
    >>8789105

    >implying that timid fighting is going to make the situation any better
    >> Anonymous 03/25/10(Thu)22:19 No.8789373
    OP again
    As we flew south, we were told by birddog that some of the northern targets had changed course, and were now tracking to a point south of the airfield. It looked like they were going to try to stay between us and the group they were leaving. We all decided that this was the fighter wing escorting the main strike package. None of the contacs over there were changing speed or course other than that. Then the bad news, about 100 miles ahead of us, the six we were tracking suddenly rocketed forward, heading towards the airfield, and because of their position, Biscuit and Scotch as well. The contacts were doing Mach 1.5 now, and Hugs and I turned to intercept, pushing our jets faster then we had anticipated. Scotch called, saying he was getting hit by a radar, but not fire control. We had no clue what these aircraft were, and they were still accelerating. Hugs didn't like it, so we all decided, this group was going down in flames, no point holding back. Bird Dog started giving us tracking information, while Hugs did his own thing. He was going to hold fire on his big missiles until he was about 35 miles, ensuring a high kill probability.
    >> Anonymous 03/25/10(Thu)22:21 No.8789399
    >>8789373
    >Mach 1.5

    Uh, oh. Those aren't harriers OP.
    >> Anonymous 03/25/10(Thu)22:22 No.8789417
         File1269570125.jpg-(157 KB, 676x507, 1260053789803.jpg)
    157 KB
    >>8789373

    >while Hugs did his own thing. He was going to hold fire on his big missiles until he was about 35 miles, ensuring a high kill probability.
    >> Anonymous 03/25/10(Thu)22:22 No.8789432
         File1269570174.jpg-(1.58 MB, 3000x2400, Rafale_070412-N-8157C-542..jpg)
    1.58 MB
    >>8789373
    Oh god.
    Painful death incoming.
    >> Anonymous 03/25/10(Thu)22:23 No.8789435
    >>8789135
    On it. I can't wipe out the text and replace it with new, but I can make something equivalent once I find a good enough picture. Way too many carrier shots seem to be taken from either the waterline or dockside and make for crappy dramatic magazine covers.
    It'll take a while to run down a good picture t
    >> Air Action Weekly 03/25/10(Thu)22:23 No.8789436
         File1269570191.gif-(1.05 MB, 300x225, 1268594900078.gif)
    1.05 MB
    >>8789373
    >Mach 1.5
    >Not Harriers
    >> sukhoi !KJHro3/ISM 03/25/10(Thu)22:23 No.8789446
    >>8789399
    Shit!

    Also, hi fligh/tg/uys, looks like I missed the start. I'm making popcorn, sad as that is.
    >> Anonymous 03/25/10(Thu)22:26 No.8789476
         File1269570364.jpg-(27 KB, 640x426, F-35_Lightning_II.jpg)
    27 KB
    >>8789432
    Since this is pretty alternate Erf I'm thinking more along these lines
    >> Anonymous 03/25/10(Thu)22:26 No.8789485
    >>8789373
    How fast does death move?
    About mach 1.5.
    >> sukhoi !KJHro3/ISM 03/25/10(Thu)22:26 No.8789489
    >>8789476
    If it's JSFs, op shouldn't be worried. Thing is crap compared to a Typhoon.
    >> Anonymous 03/25/10(Thu)22:28 No.8789520
    >>8789476
    If it was JSFs, they'd have a harder time tracking them, but it would be piss-easy to defend against them.
    >> Anonymous 03/25/10(Thu)22:29 No.8789535
    >>8789489
    I was going to say that the F-35's stealth might give it an advantage, but then I remembered the international orders don't get all the stealth goodies.
    >> Anonymous 03/25/10(Thu)22:30 No.8789548
    >>8789489
    The issue with the Typhoons would be where the fuck they came from. They're not carrier capable IIRC.
    >> Anonymous 03/25/10(Thu)22:30 No.8789550
         File1269570650.jpg-(206 KB, 571x570, 1259237430781.jpg)
    206 KB
    >>8789489
    >> Air Action Weekly 03/25/10(Thu)22:31 No.8789562
         File1269570681.jpg-(330 KB, 1024x683, Typhoon fueling.jpg)
    330 KB
    Well, its not like we didn't theorize this happening. Incoming Typhoons.
    >> Anonymous 03/25/10(Thu)22:31 No.8789571
         File1269570712.jpg-(49 KB, 750x400, AV-8B_Harrier.KC-10.drogue.jpg)
    49 KB
    >>8789548
    cont'd.

    And if they are Typhoons then OP has to worry about even more carrier based reinforcements showing up to ruin his shite.
    >> Anonymous 03/25/10(Thu)22:32 No.8789586
         File1269570755.jpg-(239 KB, 1273x1000, Usaf.kc135.750pix.jpg)
    239 KB
    >>8789571
    >>8789562
    refuelmind
    >> sukhoi !KJHro3/ISM 03/25/10(Thu)22:34 No.8789617
    >>8789548
    Oh shit. I just remembered, Ascension Island.

    http://gc.kls2.com/cgi-bin/gc?MAP-STYLE=&MARKER-STYLE=default&PATH=FHAW-FZAI&PATH-COLOR=
    red&PATH-MINIMUM=&PATH-STYLE=&PATH-UNITS=nm&RANGE=&RANGE-COLOR=navy&RANGE-ST
    YLE=best&SPEED-GROUND=&SPEED-UNITS=kts

    British used it during the Falklands.
    >> Air Action Weekly 03/25/10(Thu)22:35 No.8789632
         File1269570927.gif-(272 KB, 633x433, typhoon.gif)
    272 KB
    >>8789586

    At least mine actually is a Typhoon.
    >> Anonymous 03/25/10(Thu)22:36 No.8789651
    >>8789617
    They could make it with a tanker, but it'd be damn close.
    >> planefag 03/25/10(Thu)22:36 No.8789654
    >>8789571

    >And if they are Typhoons then OP has to worry about even more carrier based reinforcements showing up to ruin his shite.

    Not quite. The six Typhoons are foraging ahead to set up a BARCAP over the field, to sanitize the airspace for the strike package.

    Meanwhile, the strike package is loaded out for- you guessed it- a strike. I doubt they have AIM-120s loaded, perhaps two sidewinders for close-in defense. The rest is MOAR DAKKA for the ground.

    In sum- if OP's flight can badly wound the BARCAP, the strike package might not be as eager to dive into the airfield.

    Also, is it just me or is OP's flight being thrown to the wolves? The most expendable rooks left behind to slow them down?
    >> Anonymous 03/25/10(Thu)22:38 No.8789678
    >>8789617

    ... I find it interesting you know about this site.
    >> Anonymous 03/25/10(Thu)22:38 No.8789681
    We continued our approach, watching all the contacts closing on the airfield. Another transport crawled into the air, this time an Il-76. Then Hugs opened fire, FOX THREE, FOX THREE, FOX THREE, FOX THREE, four missiles arcing off his rails, pushing ahead and up, getting kinematic energy. The missiles tracked in towards the targets, who were now diving for the deck, pushing up near Mach 2 at this point. Biscuit got ready to cold launch his AMRAAMs, as did I, while Scotched started to set up for a close intercept since he only had short range weaponry. Sandy decided now was a good time to take part. He told us “I cover my nuts with my hand, and tell my WSO to light it up.” His Aardvark's massive Jammer Pods roared into action, sending out “waves of jamming radiation” according to Steve. Biscuit rippled off his AMRAAMs, and I sent two of mine into the fray as well. The aircraft were pushing downwards, jinking, so they obviously knew they had incoming.
    >> sukhoi !KJHro3/ISM 03/25/10(Thu)22:39 No.8789705
    >>8789678
    It has its uses for someone who likes planes.
    >> Anonymous 03/25/10(Thu)22:40 No.8789726
    >Also, is it just me or is OP's flight being thrown to the wolves? The most expendable rooks left behind to slow them down?

    Or at least leaving the ones who brought down the hammer to the wolves.

    It could be that this is a setup and OP is being fed to the brits while the transports get away unharmed.
    >> Air Action Weekly 03/25/10(Thu)22:40 No.8789728
         File1269571253.gif-(787 KB, 480x360, 1228593022391.gif)
    787 KB
    >>8789617
    >Ascension Island
    >Ascension Island Royal Airforce Base

    GM Steve is god.
    >> Anonymous 03/25/10(Thu)22:41 No.8789734
    Whoever decided to pack away the base's AA early needs to get fired.
    >> Anonymous 03/25/10(Thu)22:41 No.8789736
    >>8789681
    >pushing up near Mach 2

    Well not JSF's then. Enjoy ur typhoonrape OP.
    >> Anonymous 03/25/10(Thu)22:41 No.8789744
         File1269571319.jpg-(42 KB, 275x351, STALINWIN.jpg)
    42 KB
    >“I cover my nuts with my hand, and tell my WSO to light it up.”
    >> planefag 03/25/10(Thu)22:42 No.8789746
    >Scotch only has Sidewinders

    I love this son of a bitch.

    >incomings have not fired their own missiles yet

    Hmmmm.
    >> Anonymous 03/25/10(Thu)22:43 No.8789773
    >>8789746
    This makes me think Raptors wanting to stay stealthy with their bays closed.

    But if that was the case OP probably wouldn't have seen them coming in the first place. INB4 drone distraction force.
    >> Anonymous 03/25/10(Thu)22:43 No.8789774
    >>8789681
    >pushing up near Mach 2
    oh boy...the rape train is going full speed now, it's got a one way ticket right up your asses.
    >> Anonymous 03/25/10(Thu)22:43 No.8789775
    >>8789746
    They need visual confirmation.
    >> Anonymous 03/25/10(Thu)22:43 No.8789777
    >>8789734
    It is not like they get to keep the base if the UK is coming for blood. Or that whoever was left behind won't be captured. Packing all the shit you can and getting the fuck out is the right thing to do.
    >> sukhoi !KJHro3/ISM 03/25/10(Thu)22:44 No.8789787
    >>8789681
    >>8789746
    They're diving, and jinking, not engaging. Sounds like another strike flight to me!
    >> Anonymous 03/25/10(Thu)22:45 No.8789800
    >>8789775
    You would expect incoming missiles to trump the visual ROE. It's usually visual confirmation or weapons hot if you take fire, isn't it?
    >> Anonymous 03/25/10(Thu)22:45 No.8789812
    >>8789773

    >drone
    >mach 2

    wat
    >> Anonymous 03/25/10(Thu)22:46 No.8789826
         File1269571585.jpg-(186 KB, 449x600, TG Cover.jpg)
    186 KB
    >>8789135
    >If I knew how to photoshop I would change that to "The Congolese Crisis" and "HMS Ark Royal Steams South".


    I felt a little work was appropriate. Update to the modern Newsweek cover and a more modern style.

    and if the Empire strikes back was in 1982 for the Falklands, given the events in this game.... this title is only appropriate.
    >> planefag 03/25/10(Thu)22:46 No.8789829
    >>8789800

    Which is why I think Sukhoi might have it pegged here- if they knew there are missiles in the air, and they're Typhoons, and they're obviously inside AMRAAM range, they'd be returning fire right now.
    >> Air Action Weekly 03/25/10(Thu)22:47 No.8789835
         File1269571620.jpg-(70 KB, 610x397, 610x.jpg)
    70 KB
    And don't forget about the eventual cruise missile strike folks!
    >> Anonymous 03/25/10(Thu)22:48 No.8789857
    >>8789812
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lockheed_Martin_Polecat

    See also MQM-42 and QF-4 (which would be all manner of irony).

    Though the brits probably wouldn't have either of them.
    >> Air Action Weekly 03/25/10(Thu)22:49 No.8789877
         File1269571766.jpg-(302 KB, 1024x695, 1268856075056.jpg)
    302 KB
    >>8789826
    >Phantom Menace

    Brilliant.
    >> Anonymous 03/25/10(Thu)22:49 No.8789885
    Type faster OP. I'm chewing my fingers off here.
    >> Anonymous 03/25/10(Thu)22:51 No.8789906
    >>8789777

    It's not about holding the base it's about just having that little bit of extra firepower to help. Unless the AA they had was completely useless there is no excuse to not keep every weapon on the line helping to cover the escape.
    >> Anonymous 03/25/10(Thu)22:51 No.8789909
    OP again
    Scotch circled into a reverse turn, Biscuit following, so that the planes would pass underneath them, and then they'd light the burners chasing them. The question was how many would they be chasing? And how much faster were they going to go? Our missiles merged with the contacts, we held our breath as Steve rolled some dice, and then began to pull off markers. The force lost four aircraft to our ten missiles. We didn't know who had hit what, but that didn't matter. A two on two was something Biscuit and Scotch could handle, and as it was Hugs and me were out of position to chase them, since they had a speed advantage and we could at best, match their speed. So we turned north east, and pushed hard, racing towards the other massive force coming at the base. Scotch and Biscuit completed their half loop, their burners sending plumes of brown smoke through the sky as they began their dive as the two remaining aircraft roared underneath them at mach 2.1. Scotch made the spot “TORNADOS!”
    >> Anonymous 03/25/10(Thu)22:51 No.8789913
    >>8789829
    Would the Limeys really be so dumb as to not expect ATA combat given the reason they're on this hunt in the first place? Especially on their vanguard assets?

    I dunno, maybe I'm putting too much stake in Steve's troll-fu.
    >> Anonymous 03/25/10(Thu)22:51 No.8789917
    >>8789906
    So, who's going to stay behind and wait for the cruise missile to strike?

    Anyone?

    Hands, please?
    >> Anonymous 03/25/10(Thu)22:52 No.8789923
    >>8789857

    Hmm, good point, wasn't thinking about reece/target drones. Though I doubt they'd be jinking.
    >> Anonymous 03/25/10(Thu)22:53 No.8789937
         File1269571989.jpg-(137 KB, 1600x1193, panavia_tornado_1.jpg)
    137 KB
    >Scotch made the spot “TORNADOS!”

    Oh god, we were freaking out over Typhoons and shit and out comes the fucking old ground pounders.
    >> Air Action Weekly 03/25/10(Thu)22:54 No.8789948
         File1269572040.jpg-(10 KB, 445x297, RAF Tornado.jpg)
    10 KB
    Sukhoi called it, nice one.

    Which means they just used up a large chunk (all?) of their BVR weaponry on strike fighters...
    >> sukhoi !KJHro3/ISM 03/25/10(Thu)22:54 No.8789958
    >>8789937
    Might be old, but it's fast, and can cripple an airfield, maybe all the transports on the ground as well.

    Credible threat, to the overall objective.
    >> Anonymous 03/25/10(Thu)22:55 No.8789971
    >The Tornado is cleared to carry almost all the air-launched weapons in the NATO inventory, including cluster bombs, anti-runway munitions, and nuclear weapons. Ground attack aircraft also have a limited air-to-air capability with Sidewinder or ASRAAM AAMs, and the ADV variant can lauch long range AAMs such as AMRAAM.

    So if they're the strike variant, they do not, in fact, have AMRAAM/medium range missile capacity. Sukhoi is correct!
    >> Anonymous 03/25/10(Thu)22:55 No.8789974
    >>8789948
    Wouldn't that also mean that the brits are now weapons hot on OP's wing?

    It may not have been the airial assfuckery of Typhoons but those tornados now give the rest of the force a clear bill to launch some AMRAAM love OP's way.
    >> Air Action Weekly 03/25/10(Thu)22:56 No.8789994
         File1269572160.jpg-(170 KB, 800x533, RAF-Tornado-mission-marks-from(...).jpg)
    170 KB
    >>8789937

    If the RAF is gonna send Tornadoes from Ascension, I'm sure they're sending Typhoons as well.

    This may have been a very ice cold maneuver by the Brits to get OpFor to play their cards.
    >> Anonymous 03/25/10(Thu)22:56 No.8789998
    >>8789958
    Credible to the ground assets, but not to a pair of fighters armed for bear a decent distance from the runway.
    >> Anonymous 03/25/10(Thu)22:56 No.8790004
    Not sure what Steve's doing here.
    >> planefag 03/25/10(Thu)22:57 No.8790010
    I believe OP's flight just raped the SEAD force.

    Now it's the Harriers turn. Wikipedia says the latest and greatest Sea Harrier can carry and launch the AMRAAM, so perhaps they expect those to fare for themselves.
    >> Anonymous 03/25/10(Thu)22:58 No.8790022
    I have two questions for OP: Do you guys role play before and after the missions, or is the game pretty much buying stuff and then flying?

    Why don't you become a tripfag (at least temporarily) so we know when it's truly you?
    >> sukhoi !KJHro3/ISM 03/25/10(Thu)22:58 No.8790024
    >>8789974
    Based on the info op has given, (which is pretty good for describing an air battle!) I don't think the other package is carrying any BVR stuff. The Tornados were the curveball, had they concentrated on the (most likely) Harriers up north, the Nados would be doing a high speed run in on the airfield.

    Kudos to Steve for placing the ships where he did, since it basically kept OP from closing on the Harriers, and making the Tornados a more appealing target. That's how you GM. It's not a railroad, it's subtle manipulation, sweet sweet manipulation.
    >> Anonymous 03/25/10(Thu)22:59 No.8790040
    >>8790010
    It also says: >the Sea Harrier was withdrawn from Royal Navy service in March 2006
    >> Air Action Weekly 03/25/10(Thu)22:59 No.8790049
         File1269572396.jpg-(414 KB, 1000x667, raf-tornado-gr4.jpg)
    414 KB
    >>8790004
    >>8790010

    I think it might've been a cold-blooded feint/lure.

    Send the Tornadoes in, see if the OpFor opens up on them. If they do they not only reveal themselves and allow the RAF to shoot back BVR, but they use up a lot of their BVR missile capacity.
    >> Anonymous 03/25/10(Thu)23:00 No.8790067
    >>8790040
    sea harrier was withdrawn, and the Harrier GR9 replaced it.
    >> Anonymous 03/25/10(Thu)23:01 No.8790073
    >>8790040

    We're still using the Harrier GR9.
    >> Anonymous 03/25/10(Thu)23:02 No.8790090
    >>8790049
    Awesome pic!
    >> planefag 03/25/10(Thu)23:03 No.8790104
    >>8790040

    Eh? No shit? I didn't even check, I thought the Sea Harrier was still in service. Let's see...

    >IUnlike the Harrier AV8B+ upgrade, the RAF have not installed a radar into its aircraft, although the aircraft retains an Inertial Navigation System. The primary air-to-air missile (AAM) of the Harrier is the infrared-homing AIM-9 Sidewinder (the combination of Harrier and Sidewinder proved effective against Argentinian Mirages in the Falklands conflict), but it does not carry the medium range AIM-120 AMRAAM missile.

    You know, I really have no idea what the fuck the British are thinking over there.
    >> Anonymous 03/25/10(Thu)23:03 No.8790105
    >>8790073
    >Missiles: 6× AIM-9 Sidewinders; or 6× AIM-132 ASRAAM air-to-air missiles or 4× AGM-65 Maverick or 6× Brimstone air-to-ground missiles

    That's no BVR air to air capability. But at the same time OP's running low on BVR weapons themselves
    >> sukhoi !KJHro3/ISM 03/25/10(Thu)23:03 No.8790112
    >>8790049
    Let's not kid ourselves. There is no way, in modern air combat, that op has a hope in hell of knocking out the entire force. They just can't carry enough firepower. Based on reliability, you're going to want two missiles on every enemy at a minimum. Maybe less in a dogfight, but in BVR, two is the minimum.

    The way this is shaping up, OP and crew are just damage control, trying to limit just how much damage the British are going to inflict on the airfield.
    >> Anonymous 03/25/10(Thu)23:04 No.8790119
    >>8790049
    Very cold-blooded coming from Western society.

    You think those pilots were told about their role? I think Steve is a bit too much of a heartless bastard for this.
    >> Anonymous 03/25/10(Thu)23:05 No.8790136
    >>8790112
    That's pretty much impossible to do. As soon as the British get visual, cruise missile is on its way.
    >> Anonymous 03/25/10(Thu)23:06 No.8790146
    >>8790090
    I live in the highlands of scotland.
    I've seen tornados at that distance, and from that angle, when they're flying through the valleys.

    They have a habit of using trains down to Edinburgh for practice bombing runs, too...

    and lets just say you do not want to be walking over the saddle of a hillside when you hear what sounds like a little thunder, and a Tornado comes overhead on full afterburner, less than 50 feet above you, closely followed by a pair of dutch F-16s, one of which was inverted.
    I looked up into the cockpit for a second.

    will never forget that. the sight, or the noise....
    >> Anonymous 03/25/10(Thu)23:06 No.8790153
    >>8790112
    Considering the mercs are cutting and running I don't think they really give two shits about the airfield. Of course the brits probably don't know that.
    >> planefag 03/25/10(Thu)23:06 No.8790154
    >>8790112

    >The way this is shaping up, OP and crew are just damage control, trying to limit just how much damage the British are going to inflict on the airfield.

    All they really have to do is keep one of the transports from eating a missile on climb-out, or a cluster bomb on takeoff roll.

    I.E. make a hell of a mess.
    >> Air Action Weekly 03/25/10(Thu)23:06 No.8790157
    >>8790119

    Its just my guess. Sending a flight of strike fighters rushing ahead like that just feels wrong.
    >> Anonymous 03/25/10(Thu)23:07 No.8790172
    >>8790146
    That is fucking awesome.

    I wish the warthogs I see from time to time would do shit like that.
    >> Anonymous 03/25/10(Thu)23:07 No.8790181
    >>8790112

    Of course this is going to have ramifications as it is. Never mind anything else the Brits's might lose to come, 4 tornados downed is going to make them even more of an enemy of her majesty that they were already. They're going to hunt you down OP.

    And sooner or later. They'll send typhoons. Or pull some favours from the US for some Raptor support.
    >> Anonymous 03/25/10(Thu)23:08 No.8790188
    >>8790104
    >You know, I really have no idea what the fuck the British are thinking over there.

    we have no idea what we're thinking either.
    its effectively a gap before the f35 and the Queen Elizabeth class carriers come online in a few years. if Broon does'nt fuck it all up first.
    >> Anonymous 03/25/10(Thu)23:08 No.8790199
    Op again
    The second IL-76 climbed off Kitona, heading away from us and the developing air war. The Tornados must have spotted Scotch and Biscuit, since they popped a few flares as they kept pushing hard toward the airfield, getting low and very fast. Scotch got a lock and let loose a sidewinder, but Biscuit didn't get anything on the two he tried to launch, failing both rolls (followed by much swearing). Scotch's missile raced after the Tornado, and locked on to the afterburners, detonating aft. The Tornado continued on, trailing some black smoke, and quickly exiting sidewinder engagement range. Scotch and Biscuit were fucking furious, going to full burner and climbing to meet us. The Tornado's were a lost cause now.
    >> Anonymous 03/25/10(Thu)23:09 No.8790211
    >>8790104
    No shit, in AFG they're running them without even the 30mm ADEN gun pods.

    >On one occasion, a Parachute Regiment major commanding an isolated outpost described the Harrier's gun-less air support as "utterly, utterly useless".
    >> Anonymous 03/25/10(Thu)23:10 No.8790226
    >>8790199
    Mmm.

    Scotch and biscuits.

    Scotch biscuits.

    Shortbread.

    I like shortbread.
    >> Anonymous 03/25/10(Thu)23:11 No.8790244
    >>8790199

    >The Tornado's were a lost cause now.

    FUCK

    FUCK

    FUCK

    THEY'RE GOING FOR THE TRANSPORTS
    >> Anonymous 03/25/10(Thu)23:11 No.8790254
    >>8790199
    FUCK. That's four angry british gentlemen on their way to say hi to your runway at mach 2.
    >> planefag 03/25/10(Thu)23:12 No.8790265
         File1269573135.jpg-(36 KB, 240x240, 121523846794.jpg)
    36 KB
    >>8790211

    >running them without even the 30mm ADEN gun pods.

    For the love of....
    >> Anonymous 03/25/10(Thu)23:12 No.8790268
    >>8790146
    LOL! I'm a Scotfag too. Always mind-blowing to see an attack jet from above!
    >> Anonymous 03/25/10(Thu)23:13 No.8790275
    >>8790268
    So, do the Scottish Tornadoes wear kilts?
    >> Air Action Weekly 03/25/10(Thu)23:13 No.8790284
         File1269573215.jpg-(61 KB, 489x400, durandal.jpg)
    61 KB
    >>8790199
    >The Tornado's were a lost cause now.

    There goes the runway.
    >> Anonymous 03/25/10(Thu)23:13 No.8790286
    In this situation, the last thing you want to do is eject if your plane's on the verge of going up in flames.

    That'll just end up in getting you captured by Military Intelligence.
    >> Anonymous 03/25/10(Thu)23:13 No.8790287
    >>8790188

    Both carriers are being built as we speak and the orders for the f-35's are in. Brown couldn't fuck them up if he tried. Not without a major diplomatic incident and alienating most of scotland where all the carrier jobs are. Even Cameron can't do much. I expect we'll lose a few ships from the surface fleet when the cuts come in though, probably from the new Class 2 FSC's BAE just won the contract for and maybe a reduction in a few Astute Class subs scheduled to be built.
    >> Anonymous 03/25/10(Thu)23:13 No.8790289
    >>8790154
    And they have what, 2 out of 7 planes in the air, with Tornadoes coming in for a run?

    Yeh...
    >> Anonymous 03/25/10(Thu)23:14 No.8790296
    >>8790244

    courage, lad, remember OP said the more experienced (i.e. non-expendable) flights were escorting the outgoing transports. They might have defenses yet.

    Worry about the runway.
    >> Anonymous 03/25/10(Thu)23:15 No.8790305
    >>8790268
    eyup there.

    nowadays its mostly tornadoes from Lossiemouth, but occasional typhoons, and of course nimrods too.
    >> Anonymous 03/25/10(Thu)23:15 No.8790318
    >>8790275
    Yes, but they fly much too low to see if they have anything on underneath.
    >> Anonymous 03/25/10(Thu)23:15 No.8790324
    >>8789917

    You know what would have helped keep some of the heat off those transports? Some AA
    >> Anonymous 03/25/10(Thu)23:16 No.8790343
    >>8790324
    Want to know what would get needlessly turned into scrap when the cruise missiles hit in 15 minutes? the AA.
    >> Anonymous 03/25/10(Thu)23:17 No.8790346
    >>8790287
    >Brown couldn't fuck them up if he tried

    never underestimate the ability of politicians to wreck an otherwise simple job... the Queensferry Cyclops is no different from the rest in that respect, and he probably could shaft it over somehow.

    At least he's better than My Little Tony.
    >> Anonymous 03/25/10(Thu)23:17 No.8790355
    This is better than the movies.
    >> Air Action Weekly 03/25/10(Thu)23:17 No.8790363
         File1269573479.jpg-(169 KB, 800x592, Stanley_runway_craters.jpg)
    169 KB
    >>8790324

    I betcha they're not after the airborne transports. They're after the runway. 5 transports still on the ground.
    >> planefag 03/25/10(Thu)23:18 No.8790365
         File1269573482.jpg-(118 KB, 798x373, 1251998443944.jpg)
    118 KB
    >>8790287

    >England getting F-35 Lightning IIs and new carriers to put them on

    This pleases me.
    >> Anonymous 03/25/10(Thu)23:18 No.8790368
    op again
    Sandy provided a last line of defence, lighting up his radar, and having one of his Jammer pods imitate a SAM launch, which caused both Tornados to pull hard south, dumping chaff. Steve made a few rolls, and then told us, that as the Tornado's pulled away, the one trailing smoke suddenly began to pour smoke from one of it's engines, and panels were blowing away, flames pushing out from the damaged engine. He told Scotch that as he looked over, the plane burped flamed, then disintegrated into a Mach 2+ fireball, before crashing into the Atlantic. The other Tornado began a slow turn, heading towards the airfield again, but at least we'd delayed it, it would arrive at the same time as the Harriers now. We were told that a C-27J was pushing into the air off the field. Biscuit Scotch joined up behind Hugs and me by a bunch of miles. The four targets between us and the main force began closing on us, turning slightly to try to keep us away from the strike formation. We looked at the distances and hatched a quick plan, and then went to full military burner, racing headfirst at the defensive patrol. We all hit our Radars, figuring we may as well try to scare the shit out of them.
    >> Anonymous 03/25/10(Thu)23:18 No.8790369
    >>8790343

    Better AA then transports.
    >> Anonymous 03/25/10(Thu)23:20 No.8790411
    >>8790363

    >mostly undamaged runway

    Now there's a shitty bombing run for you.

    They might have a chance. Only two Tornados are left, and one took a knock from a Sidewinder proximity burst. If they're using iron bombs rather then Durandals, they might yet blow their rolls, especially the damaged one.

    Also, where did you all get the figure of ten transports?
    >> Anonymous 03/25/10(Thu)23:21 No.8790429
    >>8790305
    Tornadoes are pretty common, I've never see a Typhoon in the wild. Saw a Buccaneer when I was a kid, those things were LOUD!!!
    >> Anonymous 03/25/10(Thu)23:22 No.8790454
    >>8790368
    Does Sandy get credit for that one, or is it an unclaimed incidental?
    >> Anonymous 03/25/10(Thu)23:22 No.8790464
    >>8790365

    It's a nice feeling actually having some decent stuff for once. To be fair the Navy's actually done pretty well for itself in the past decade or so. The Type-45 is awesome, as is the Astute subs. The QEII carriers should transform our Force projection capabilities by an order of magnitude. Shame the Army hasn't seen quite as much of the love.
    >> Anonymous 03/25/10(Thu)23:22 No.8790465
    >>8790363
    obviously.

    JP233 runway cratering submunitions. deny the opposing force its landing point, if an escape route is unknown.

    will likely have satellite imaging of the exact details of the entire airbase and what to neutralise. a burning transport on the ramp will just help further.
    >> planefag 03/25/10(Thu)23:22 No.8790467
         File1269573765.gif-(6 KB, 381x178, 1259280319755.gif)
    6 KB
    >Sandy provided a last line of defence, lighting up his radar, and having one of his Jammer pods imitate a SAM launch, which caused both Tornados to pull hard south,

    BRILLIANT
    >> Anonymous 03/25/10(Thu)23:23 No.8790489
         File1269573827.jpg-(16 KB, 292x421, blair_247263s.jpg)
    16 KB
    >>8790346
    He's not better at being good than TB, he's just not as good as being bad.
    >> Air Action Weekly 03/25/10(Thu)23:24 No.8790498
    >>8790467
    Hell, there is even a chance the surviving Tornado'll think a missile did in his buddy instead of earlier damage. Dunno how close they were together or how likely that is though.
    >> Anonymous 03/25/10(Thu)23:25 No.8790529
    >>8790368
    SAM launch from where? One of the ships offshore?
    >> planefag 03/25/10(Thu)23:26 No.8790549
    >>8790498

    more then that, this Tornado pilot just had his whole flight totally wiped out and he's still making for his target? Balls of steel on those Brits, man, balls of steel.

    >>8790464

    >nice to have decent stuff

    Isn't it just, for a change?
    >> Anonymous 03/25/10(Thu)23:27 No.8790552
    >>8790411
    >Now there's a shitty bombing run for you.

    actually that "shitty bombing run" of Black Buck 1 cleanly cut the runway in half, preventing its use by argentine fast jets, forcing the pull-back of jets to argentine mainland, a move which prevented the jets having loiter time over the falklands, which handed the Royal Navy Harriers complete air superiority, and won the war. it also conveniently kept the runway usable for Hercules transports when the Royal Marines retook Stanley not long after.


    which rather goes to indicate you need to do better research.
    >> Anonymous 03/25/10(Thu)23:27 No.8790559
    >>8790489
    God, he gave us a real scare last year.

    We all thought he was gone for good, then suddenly, candidate for EU President.

    It was as if a million voices screamed "NO! WE THOUGHT YOU WERE GONE! GET THE FUCK OFF OF OUR TELEVISION SCREENS, YOU PROFESSIONAL TROLL!" at the top of their lungs.
    >> Anonymous 03/25/10(Thu)23:27 No.8790567
    >>Sandy provided a last line of defence, lighting up his radar, and having one of his Jammer pods imitate a SAM launch, which caused both Tornados to pull hard south,

    Heh. "When i'm good, i'm very..Very good. But when i'm bad? I'm Better."
    >> Air Action Weekly 03/25/10(Thu)23:27 No.8790568
    >>8790529

    The Brits likely have no idea exactly what OpFor has on hand. Plus I think the Mercs are over land, so they probably assumed it was an SA-2 or similar.
    >> Anonymous 03/25/10(Thu)23:29 No.8790603
    >>8790568
    I keep thinking that the brits informant got the news out to them rather than getting killed. Makes sense now.
    >> Anonymous 03/25/10(Thu)23:30 No.8790629
    OP again
    We all broke the sound Barrier, although I will admit that Hugs was kicking the crap out of our tubs, blasting forward like some angry goose necked harbinger of death. He dumped his last two Alamo's at 50 miles, which gave them a pretty good energy boost from his own aircraft's speed. The rest of us were pushing up in speed, and I will admit, the distance I covered in a phase was pretty awesome, I had not had the Phantom up this fast ever before, and even on the table top I was thinking “For a 40 year old plane, this thing can haul ass!” I pumped off my AMRAAMs as I crossed the 25 mile line, with Hugs about 5 miles ahead of me. His two Alamos impacted, wiping out one of the Harriers (Made his spot check). Well, one of them missed, but the other didn't. My AMRAAMs came down, also knocking out one of the Harrier's, this one turning towards Hugs. Hugs roared through the formation at Mach 1.7ish, and asked Steve something. Steve was moving both remaining harriers in an impossibly tight maneuver, apparently they had slowed, using vectored thrust to help pivot to slap into a rear aspect shot on the Flanker. Both of them launched, Hugs pumping out flares, and cut burners. And then Hugs told Steve he was using his hemet reticule to launch an archer. So, flying through a loose formation of Harriers in a Flanker at almost double the speed of sound, Hugs launched a missile sideways off the rail towards one of the offending Harriers.
    >> Anonymous 03/25/10(Thu)23:30 No.8790631
         File1269574236.jpg-(75 KB, 450x338, bLAIR.jpg)
    75 KB
    >>8790559

    Actually I would have loved him to be President. If only to see the look on Brown's face. He might actually have made Europe a little better as well despite being a twat.
    >> Anonymous 03/25/10(Thu)23:31 No.8790651
    So when OP makes an ass out of the British will the rest of NATO step in to pull their ass out of the fire or will OP's merc company just start getting in piles of high paying offers from assorted countries who want people who can play ball with a 1st world airforce?
    >> Anonymous 03/25/10(Thu)23:33 No.8790696
         File1269574423.png-(58 KB, 170x360, 1268502136539.png)
    58 KB
    >>8790629

    >flying through a loose formation of Harriers in a Flanker at almost double the speed of sound, Hugs launched a missile sideways off the rail towards one of the offending Harriers.

    Screw it if he hits or not. Hugs Win
    >> Anonymous 03/25/10(Thu)23:34 No.8790702
    >>8790629
    >So, flying through a loose formation of Harriers in a Flanker at almost double the speed of sound, Hugs launched a missile sideways off the rail towards one of the offending Harriers.

    o.0
    >> Anonymous 03/25/10(Thu)23:35 No.8790728
    >>8790552

    Looks to me like half the runway is a straight shot with no craters on it (that is to say, half of the runway the long way, so the entire length of it can be used.) Now I'm not quite sure of the scale, but judging from the road and other things, it doesn't look like that runway is so narrow that a fighter'd need the whole width of it to take off (landing would be a dicier matter, naturally.)

    As for research, well, I'm not a Bomb Damage Assessment expert, but assuming that I don't know all the details of the Falkands war off the top of my head (as most people who don't live in England do,) why am I expected to do RESEARCH before commenting on a picture on fucking 4chan?
    >> Anonymous 03/25/10(Thu)23:35 No.8790740
    >>8790629
    How?
    >> Anonymous 03/25/10(Thu)23:37 No.8790757
    Why didnt the Harriers shoot back
    >> Anonymous 03/25/10(Thu)23:37 No.8790764
    >>8790757
    who the fuck knows.
    >> Anonymous 03/25/10(Thu)23:37 No.8790765
         File1269574653.jpg-(272 KB, 2144x1424, Sukhoi3.jpg)
    272 KB
    >>40 year old plane
    Make that 50
    >So, flying through a loose formation of Harriers in a Flanker at almost double the speed of sound, Hugs launched a missile sideways off the rail towards one of the offending Harriers.
    Fuck yeah. This is what Flankers were MADE FOR!
    >> Anonymous 03/25/10(Thu)23:37 No.8790772
    >>8790629
    OP again
    Another C-27J took off the runway at Kitona, the remaining Tornado quickly closing on the base. Hugs archer missed, but the follow up from Biscuit did not. The rest of us couldn't get locks, so we dumped flares and roared past the three flaming harriers falling towards the Atlantic, the fourth shooting, but missing at Scotch. Our momentum, like the Tornados, was an advantage. We were cutting into our fuel, but we had a lot, and now the other Air to Air Harrier was in a tail chase towards us, and it wouldn't win. We were now banging away with our Radar, despite having nothing BVR to shoot. The strike force accelerated a bit, but not much, but descending down below the clouds near the coast. We'd have a very short time after intercept until they were over the base.
    >> planefag 03/25/10(Thu)23:38 No.8790779
         File1269574687.png-(367 KB, 488x462, 1266741241596.png)
    367 KB
    >My AMRAAMs came down, also knocking out one of the Harrier's, this one turning towards Hugs. Hugs roared through the formation at Mach 1.7ish, and asked Steve something. Steve was moving both remaining harriers in an impossibly tight maneuver, apparently they had slowed, using vectored thrust to help pivot to slap into a rear aspect shot on the Flanker. Both of them launched, Hugs pumping out flares, and cut burners. And then Hugs told Steve he was using his hemet reticule to launch an archer. So, flying through a loose formation of Harriers in a Flanker at almost double the speed of sound, Hugs launched a missile sideways off the rail towards one of the offending Harriers.

    I... I don't even...
    >> Anonymous 03/25/10(Thu)23:38 No.8790782
         File1269574693.jpg-(454 KB, 2000x1258, dogfight.jpg)
    454 KB
    >>8790629

    Now thats what I call getting stuck in.
    >> Anonymous 03/25/10(Thu)23:38 No.8790794
    >>8790757
    They did. He said they both launched. He flared and used burners.
    >> Anonymous 03/25/10(Thu)23:39 No.8790817
    >>8790794
    using burners against heatseekers does not seem to me to be the best idea in the world.
    >> Anonymous 03/25/10(Thu)23:39 No.8790818
    >Steve was moving both remaining harriers in an impossibly tight maneuver, apparently they had slowed, using vectored thrust to help pivot to slap into a rear aspect shot on the Flanker.

    Steve really does know his shit.
    >> sukhoi !KJHro3/ISM 03/25/10(Thu)23:40 No.8790820
    >>8790629
    I, I think I.. I think I love Hugs...
    >> Anonymous 03/25/10(Thu)23:40 No.8790821
    >>8790740
    >>8790757
    >>8790764


    sadly, my respect for steve's just dropped a few notches. It appears this is the Lobotomy Air Force, not the Fleet Air Arm.
    >> Anonymous 03/25/10(Thu)23:40 No.8790837
    >>8790821
    Maybe he's taking it easy on them or trying to lull them into a false sense of security?

    The last two missions were a bit of a kick in the nuts after all.
    >> Anonymous 03/25/10(Thu)23:42 No.8790861
    >>8790821
    >>8790837
    see
    >>8790794
    >> Anonymous 03/25/10(Thu)23:42 No.8790870
    >>8790821
    Maybe he's more concerned with running a fuckawesome game than with being 100% accurate in the process.
    >> sukhoi !KJHro3/ISM 03/25/10(Thu)23:43 No.8790875
    >>8790821
    They did shoot back, but they were at a disadvantage, supersonic aircraft, all four air superiority, vs an aging strike aircraft with heatseekers. OP's group apparently didn't take the bait, and is just blasting through, towards the main force, trusting their speed is going to keep them safe from whatever remaining Harriers exist from the 'air superiority' section.
    >> Anonymous 03/25/10(Thu)23:43 No.8790878
    >>8790794
    No, he flared and CUT burners.
    >> Anonymous 03/25/10(Thu)23:43 No.8790886
    >>8790870
    He's also going babies on them.

    The Liberian escort mission was riskier than this is.
    >> Anonymous 03/25/10(Thu)23:44 No.8790898
    >>8790870

    I'm a little concerned that he might be going a little easy on them though given the scenario. Too much rule of cool ruins the atmosphere. Lets wait and see what happens.
    >> planefag 03/25/10(Thu)23:44 No.8790902
         File1269575088.jpg-(50 KB, 700x443, 1266192321187.jpg)
    50 KB
    >>8790875

    They're going to hit those harriers at Mach 2 like the FIST OF AN ANGRY GOD. Then they'll haul ass, turn around, and come in for another go.

    Bag'n'drag.

    This is easily the most intense mission yet.
    >> Anonymous 03/25/10(Thu)23:44 No.8790904
    >>8790861

    >implying all the Harriers fired as OP's group came in and didnt wait until you could smell the aftershave
    >> Anonymous 03/25/10(Thu)23:45 No.8790912
    >>8790875
    Bursting through at supersonic speeds against enemies armed with heatseekers and giving them a sexy rear-aspect shot is just asking for one up the pipe.

    Steve is going easy mode I think.
    >> Anonymous 03/25/10(Thu)23:45 No.8790920
    >>8790870

    There's 14 harriers and your telling me only two got a shot off.
    >> Anonymous 03/25/10(Thu)23:46 No.8790924
    >>8790898
    >>8790886

    From the previous threads, right about now is when the players get their kick in the nuts.

    Cruise missile, anyone?
    >> Anonymous 03/25/10(Thu)23:47 No.8790937
    Y'know, the British aren't really dumb, here. For starters, they only had Harrier assets in the area, and those same assets performed just fine in the Falklands. They had no reason to expect a Merc group to be better equipped. Perhaps they should know about Black Flag, or perhaps intel dropped the ball. Or perhaps the Tornadoes were supposed to nail the runway before any interceptors could get wheels-up, and Black Flag wasn't supposed to know about the goddamn carrier being in the area at all, but OH HAY they paid somebody off in a high place.
    >> Anonymous 03/25/10(Thu)23:47 No.8790943
    >>8790837
    Argentine Airforce vs Harriers. 0 kills. Iraqi Airforce Vs Tornado, Baccaneer, Jaguar... 0kills.
    5 mercs in 50-year old airframes, 1 engagement... how many tornado and harriers down?

    hrmmmm.

    there's suspension of disbelief, and then there's just plain unlikely. and we're well into the realms of silly there. and while I may well sit with ones tea and crumpet in horror old chaps, before the "butthurt" comments fly, I would argue exactly the same if it were the french, itallian, german, US, or similar first-world airforces...
    >> sukhoi !KJHro3/ISM 03/25/10(Thu)23:48 No.8790950
    >>8790912
    Rear aspect on a Mach 2 is a tough shot, especially if the launch platform is slow, since the missile needs to first match, then catch the target's speed. The rocket will burn out, and then it *might* have enough speed to maintain closure.

    I'm not saying that breaking through the line was smart, but compared to slowing and going sub sonic against Harriers in a turning fight, probably the best choice.
    >> Anonymous 03/25/10(Thu)23:48 No.8790956
    >>8790920

    Six Harriers were flying a Barrier Combat Air Patrol between OP's flight and the other Harriers, the strike craft. A few of those six got nailed by BVR missiles before they could even fight back. The remainder took tail-chase shots.

    Read the fucking thread.
    >> Anonymous 03/25/10(Thu)23:49 No.8790966
    >>8790943
    To be fair, the Iraqi Air Force was utter rubbish. Same can't be said for all their pre-OIF assets, but their pilot training was quite subpar.
    >> Anonymous 03/25/10(Thu)23:50 No.8790970
    Why the fuck haven't those Harriers blaster your ass out of the sky. What is preventing them from doing the same thing you did to the Tornados? Shoudn't they have lit you up a long time ago?

    GOD DAMN THIS SHIT IS EASY MODE!
    >> Anonymous 03/25/10(Thu)23:50 No.8790973
    >>8790837

    Turns out the British weren't actually here to kill the OP's squadron, but to put on a charity airshow for the victims of Pointe Noire. The harriers were reacting slowly because they were giving free rides to the orphans of the OP's previous atrocities.
    >> Anonymous 03/25/10(Thu)23:50 No.8790975
    >replace Harriers with Spitfires
    >2 of OP's flight shot down

    Just as planned.
    >> sukhoi !KJHro3/ISM 03/25/10(Thu)23:51 No.8790991
    >>8790970
    I'm going to go with: Harrier is an aging strike platform that doesn't do any job particularly well.
    >> Anonymous 03/25/10(Thu)23:51 No.8790992
         File1269575491.jpg-(38 KB, 604x460, 6368_103605249759_520519759_21(...).jpg)
    38 KB
    >>8790943

    >flight of air-superiority fighters using brand-new, up-to-date air-to-air missiles engaging strike aircraft, many of them sub-sonic, with no radar-guided missiles

    >flight of six tornadoes takes TEN MISSILES and two manage to survive, as is fitting for planes with modern ECM systems
    >> Skyhawk !c6DO1M4BMw 03/25/10(Thu)23:52 No.8791004
    Wow thought i'd missed this!

    Awesome off bore shot Hugs! Didn't know he had the capability yet. This is going better than I thought it would after the numbers Steve threw at them...but then they're only now getting fired at so it could turn around REAL fast.
    >> Anonymous 03/25/10(Thu)23:52 No.8791007
    >>8790943
    slight edit. had a brainfart - entire iraqi airforce, 2 tornado losses.

    (a good few damaged and ditched from ground-launched of course, but not A2A)
    >> Anonymous 03/25/10(Thu)23:52 No.8791008
    So after firing at the Tornadoes and Harriers how many missles are left?
    >> Anonymous 03/25/10(Thu)23:53 No.8791016
         File1269575597.gif-(566 KB, 360x359, 1266257264779.gif)
    566 KB
    >flying through a loose formation of Harriers in a Flanker at almost double the speed of sound, Hugs launched a missile sideways off the rail towards one of the offending Harriers.
    >> planefag 03/25/10(Thu)23:54 No.8791027
         File1269575645.gif-(50 KB, 345x329, 11ss.gif)
    50 KB
    >>8790943
    >>8790920
    >>8790970

    Please refer to this image to understand why the Harriers are getting screwed.
    >> Anonymous 03/25/10(Thu)23:55 No.8791049
    >>8790991
    Yeah, but if the Harrier is an "aging" plane, what deprecating descriptive that excuses pathetic performance are you going to apply to the OP's squadron of antiques?
    >> Anonymous 03/25/10(Thu)23:55 No.8791055
    >>8790970
    They don't have the capability to carry BVR armaments.

    The british obviously knew about OP's former exploits so they should have been expecting stiffer resistance and maybe waited until they could bring in a few wings of Typhoons for air cover or maybe dragged the U.S. in and got some raptors on scene. The only reason this isn't a slaughter the other way around is that the brits dropped the intel ball off a fucking cliff.

    I'm not saying that it detracts from the recounting of the sortie, but it makes it feel less like the previous missions where Steve master-tier-trolled the OP's wing with much less.
    >> Anonymous 03/25/10(Thu)23:57 No.8791067
    op again
    Sandy angled towards the base, lighting off his own cans and going to maximum sweep. We approached the main strike package, but were not going to have much time to do anything, and there was still a lot of aircraft on the ground, despite the AN-22 getting into the air. We were then told that Bird Dog was bugging out, but that a gift was on the way. We had no clue what that meant, all we knew for certain was that our AWAACs was leaving us, so it was our own eyeballs. We dropped below the clouds, emerging into the darker lower altitudes below, our plains pelted by rain as we came off the burners, still on our supersonic intercept towards the mass of what we assumed were Harriers closing on the base. And then the lone Tornado made its run.
    >> Anonymous 03/25/10(Thu)23:57 No.8791070
    >>8791027
    Actually now that OP is out of BVR missiles it's about the same. But they still have a massive speed advantage over the subsonic harriers, and the strike harriers are plain fucked.

    >>8791049
    The SU-27 is still pretty hot shit, even if the phatoms and the Viggen aren't so much.
    >> Anonymous 03/25/10(Thu)23:58 No.8791087
    >>8791049

    Modifications. She can do 0.5 past Mach 3. She might not look like much but she's got it where it counts. Lots of special modifications.
    >> Anonymous 03/25/10(Thu)23:59 No.8791095
    >>8791067

    what happened to the Harriers
    >> Anonymous 03/25/10(Thu)23:59 No.8791099
    >>8791087
    When did they get their hands on a blackbird or mig-31?
    >> Anonymous 03/25/10(Thu)23:59 No.8791104
    >what we assumed were Harriers closing on the base

    oh...shit...
    >> Anonymous 03/25/10(Thu)23:59 No.8791110
    >>8791067

    A gift?

    Here comes the Cavalry.
    >> Anonymous 03/26/10(Fri)00:00 No.8791118
    >>8791049
    Flanker, Phantom 2000s, Aardvark. No Antiques there. They all benefit from being more specialized then the Harrier, which, due to its jack of all trades master of none philosophy tends to be inferior in every aspect.

    I honestly don't care though, this would have been a fucking sweet game to play. "DAMN THE SIDEWINDERS! FULL BURNER AHEAD!"
    >> Skyhawk !c6DO1M4BMw 03/26/10(Fri)00:00 No.8791125
    >>And then the lone Tornado made its run.

    Crap on a stick
    >> Anonymous 03/26/10(Fri)00:01 No.8791130
    >>8791099

    Didn't a MiG-25 do Mach 3+ over Egypt once but barely landed, having slagged the engine completely?
    >> Anonymous 03/26/10(Fri)00:01 No.8791131
    >>8791110

    A set up maybe.
    >> Anonymous 03/26/10(Fri)00:01 No.8791132
    >>and there was still a lot of aircraft on the ground, despite the AN-22 getting into the air
    >>AN-22 COCK
    >>and there was still a lot of aircraft on the ground, despite the Cock getting into the air

    SO TO SPEAK
    >> planefag 03/26/10(Fri)00:01 No.8791133
         File1269576092.jpg-(14 KB, 240x181, 38206_4c6p99lxmm_m.jpg)
    14 KB
    >>8791087

    AND THE RIO IS A WOOKIE
    >> Anonymous 03/26/10(Fri)00:01 No.8791135
    >>8791118
    >Aardvark
    >18 July 1967
    >Not aging
    well 3 out of 5 ain't terrible.
    >> Anonymous 03/26/10(Fri)00:02 No.8791151
    >And then the lone tornado made it's run

    And you guys doubted Steve. You doubted.
    >> Anonymous 03/26/10(Fri)00:02 No.8791153
    >>8791130
    That's what happened to MIG-25 engines whenever they pushed them. Things were pieces of shit, fast pieces of shit though.
    >> Anonymous 03/26/10(Fri)00:02 No.8791161
    >>8791095

    dissapeared due to plot, and the missles they fired
    >> Anonymous 03/26/10(Fri)00:04 No.8791185
    >>8791095
    OP burned past their screen at mach2+ getting out of sidewinder range before they could shove some up their asses and outrunning the slower than molasses harriers quick as you please.
    >> Anonymous 03/26/10(Fri)00:04 No.8791188
         File1269576254.gif-(161 KB, 721x378, m-falcom.gif)
    161 KB
    >>8791099
    :-\
    >> Anonymous 03/26/10(Fri)00:05 No.8791206
    >>8791153

    Ayup. Once you spun them up over a certain point, they'd start throwing fan blades and literally tear themselves apart. The Soviets simply didn't have the metallurgy to match the power output.
    >> Anonymous 03/26/10(Fri)00:06 No.8791221
    >>8791118
    Flanker desinged, 1970's, first flight 1977. 33 years old
    Phantom 2000 - basic airframe designed in 1950's, fist flet in 1958. 52 years old. 2000 upgrade designed in the early 1980's, demonstrated in 1987. 23 years old.
    F111 first flew, 1964. 46 years old.

    antiques.
    >> Anonymous 03/26/10(Fri)00:07 No.8791225
    >>8791206
    They still managed to scare the piss out of NATO though. Until they got their hands on one and did a continent wide facepalm.
    >> Anonymous 03/26/10(Fri)00:08 No.8791231
    >>8791221
    Most combat aircraft except a few of the generation 4.5+ers are at least 20 odd years old. Everything's an antique.
    >> Anonymous 03/26/10(Fri)00:08 No.8791232
    OP again

    The Tornado passed low over the base, having slowed to make it's attack run. The canisters on it's wings flew open, and it flew the length of the runway, dispensing runway cratering munitions, and in the process wiping out the C-27 on it's takeoff roll, first by popping off a wing, and then the flaming craft dropped into a crater and rolled, tossing men and equipment into the air as it completed its flaming death throes. The Tornado began climbing, chasing after the large AN-22 that was slowly climbing out. We on the other hand, were just entering attack range, when three harriers almost stopped in mid air, disappearing behind Hugs and me in a blur of navy gray. Hugs couldn't get a lock, and I didn't have the aspect to do so, I did have a shot ahead of me, so I launched a sidewinder, switched targets, and launched another one. Both planes jinked, dumping flares, and whatever ordnance they were carrying. Small victory I suppose, and then both my missiles missed. Hugs meanwhile was cartwheeling sideways through the air, trying to manage speed so that he could get a lock on the Harrier's behind him. Then they launched.
    >> Skyhawk !c6DO1M4BMw 03/26/10(Fri)00:08 No.8791237
    >>8791221
    by your logic then both of the US's primary aircraft are antiques as well. F15 and F16 are just as old as the Sukhoi.
    >> Anonymous 03/26/10(Fri)00:08 No.8791238
    >>8791221

    Harrier jump jet- introduced 1969
    >> Air Action Weekly 03/26/10(Fri)00:09 No.8791258
         File1269576573.jpg-(211 KB, 948x624, hussars (3).jpg)
    211 KB
    >>8791067
    >gift was on the way
    >AWAACs was leaving us,
    >we found out that the Midas and Bird Dog were being escorted by some of Blackwood's Hussars

    Incoming backup.
    >> Anonymous 03/26/10(Fri)00:09 No.8791260
    >>8791232

    >Then they launched.

    DON'T STOP THERE DON'T STOP THERE DON'T FUCKING STOP THERE AAAAURRGH
    >> Anonymous 03/26/10(Fri)00:09 No.8791264
    >>8791232
    This is what it should've been like all the way through. You should've been crushed from the start.
    >> Anonymous 03/26/10(Fri)00:10 No.8791272
    >>8791237
    Hence them getting replaced.
    >> Anonymous 03/26/10(Fri)00:11 No.8791279
    >>8791232

    I think your making half this shit up
    >> Anonymous 03/26/10(Fri)00:11 No.8791281
    >>8791238
    Harrier GR9 was introduced into service in 2006. It's a goddamn baby.
    >> Anonymous 03/26/10(Fri)00:11 No.8791283
    >>8791264
    What fun would that have been? These are mercenaries, fighting against the odds. Op isn't winning, not if my aircraft count is right. They're going to have to slow, and the Harrier is going to come into its element.
    >> Anonymous 03/26/10(Fri)00:11 No.8791289
    >>8791221
    >>8791237
    By his definition, the F-22 is practically an antique, at 20 years old.
    Brotip: planes are designed to last a long time, gradually improving capability through upgrades and overhauls. Old does not mean antique.
    >> Anonymous 03/26/10(Fri)00:12 No.8791291
    >>8791279
    Agreed.

    Everyone who thinks that this is just a pile of bullshit fabrication, say aye.
    >> Skyhawk !c6DO1M4BMw 03/26/10(Fri)00:12 No.8791298
    >>wiping out the C-27 on it's takeoff roll
    >>Then they launched.

    Yep...things just took a turn for the worst. And that "Gift" is probably a company missile up the tail pipe for each of you.
    >> Anonymous 03/26/10(Fri)00:12 No.8791306
    >>8791264

    agreed.
    >> Anonymous 03/26/10(Fri)00:12 No.8791308
    >>8791298
    Liquidating assets was never so much fun!
    >> Anonymous 03/26/10(Fri)00:12 No.8791309
    >>8791283
    It's supposed to be realistic.

    This should've been a fighting retreat, not a CHAAARGE
    >> Anonymous 03/26/10(Fri)00:13 No.8791310
    >>8791281
    Doesn't matter, it's an incremental upgrade on the aircraft, mostly avionics. And it's still a shit aircraft. Ask any fighter pilot if he'd rather be in a Phantom or a Harrier in an Air to Air engagement. Or a Flanker. Or a Viper. None will choose the Harrier.
    >> Anonymous 03/26/10(Fri)00:13 No.8791312
    >>8791291
    I don't give a fuck, it is sweet anyway.
    >> Anonymous 03/26/10(Fri)00:13 No.8791315
    >>8791309
    I think that's what Steve expected before they took off like a bat out of hell after the tornadoes.
    >> Anonymous 03/26/10(Fri)00:14 No.8791322
    >>8791267

    >Harrier GR9

    Oh, oh, you want to use THE LATEST UPGRADE of that fighter? Gee, okay, then, let's use that for the rest of them:

    Phantom 2000- upgraded in 2000
    Su-27- upgraded in 2006
    Viggen, final interceptor variant entered service in 1980

    So yeah, you need to shut the fuck up.
    >> Anonymous 03/26/10(Fri)00:14 No.8791325
    >>8791309
    Given that they are the "fighting" part and that the "retreat" part is still very vulnerable on the ground I think they are acting pretty correct here.
    >> Anonymous 03/26/10(Fri)00:14 No.8791333
    >>8791225

    "Wow, these things output slightly more thrust than we thought they di-SWEET JESUS IT'S SPRAYING FIRE AND SHRAPNEL SHUT IT THE FUCK DOWN!!"
    >> Anonymous 03/26/10(Fri)00:15 No.8791337
    >>8791322
    considering it's the only harrier in service in the Royal Navy I'm pretty sure it's a fair comparison.
    >> Anonymous 03/26/10(Fri)00:15 No.8791346
    >>8791325

    I'm not saying what they've done has been wrong. Just that combat screen of harrier should have been alot more aggressive than they were.
    >> Anonymous 03/26/10(Fri)00:15 No.8791347
    >>8791309
    Best offense is a good defense. You want to knock the planes out of the sky before they get to the field. The british objective is knocking out that field, and whatever is there. OP and company just want to get out of there with as much equipment as possible intact. Racing out to meet the inbounds makes sense, why let them take out the full airfield and then engage?
    >> planefag 03/26/10(Fri)00:16 No.8791354
         File1269576991.jpg-(36 KB, 717x430, 1257997196940.jpg)
    36 KB
    >>8791264
    >>8791279
    >>8791291
    >>8791306
    >>8791309

    Doing good there for a while, champ, but you got a little too obvious just now. Jolly good try.

    Posts hidden, moving on.
    >> Anonymous 03/26/10(Fri)00:16 No.8791359
    >>8791291
    We've already discussed that this could be the best trolling from /k/ ever.

    It was decided that nobody gives a fuck if it is or isn't because this is awesome.

    Also, too many little details have added up in OP's story for me to think it false. Conversely, the BS Grendel campaign story had pretty obvious flaws in its telling if you were looking for them.
    >> Anonymous 03/26/10(Fri)00:17 No.8791371
    >>8791322
    I'm pretty sure Hugs isn't using the latest Flanker.
    If he was, he'd be raping the shit out of everything, and outmaneuvering even those Harriers.
    More than he is already, I mean.
    >> Anonymous 03/26/10(Fri)00:17 No.8791372
    >>8791359
    >the BS Grendel campaign story
    I don't believe I'm familiar with this.
    >> Anonymous 03/26/10(Fri)00:17 No.8791374
    >>8791354

    5/10
    >> Anonymous 03/26/10(Fri)00:18 No.8791383
         File1269577104.jpg-(1.18 MB, 2600x1232, Mig -25_Foxbat_in_Afterburner_(...).jpg)
    1.18 MB
    >>8791333
    Awesome!!!
    >> Anonymous 03/26/10(Fri)00:18 No.8791385
    >>8791322
    >Oh, oh, you want to use THE LATEST UPGRADE of that fighter? Gee, okay, then, let's use that for the rest of them:

    the latest upgrades from the military forces using them...
    not the mercenary forces who were selecting their equipment on a budget a dozen flights ago.

    what you're trying to say is that if I go out and buy a couple of old GT Ferraris or GT2 Dodge Vipers and get people to jump into them, they'll run as fast, and more significantly, as reliably and consistently as the Works factory cars...

    no hope.
    >> Anonymous 03/26/10(Fri)00:18 No.8791388
    >>8791372
    wait nevermind, that was the lolsuperpowered dark heresy thing, right?
    >> Anonymous 03/26/10(Fri)00:18 No.8791396
    >>8791354

    bawww less, read more
    >> Anonymous 03/26/10(Fri)00:19 No.8791406
    >>8791385

    The variants of the aircraft our Merc players are using have been specifically mentioned, which is how we know OP is flying a Phantom 2000.
    >> Anonymous 03/26/10(Fri)00:19 No.8791412
    >>8791385
    Cars aren't really a good comparison here because collector cars will often run better than their factory counterparts.

    Now if you had said honda civics or some other cheap POS you might have had a good analogy. But I'm just nitpicking.
    >> Anonymous 03/26/10(Fri)00:20 No.8791419
    >>8791388
    Yeah. Chances are that Grendel actually did manage to defeat the Charnel Daemon in one-on-one combat - but everything after that was clearly bullshit or GM fiat.
    >> Anonymous 03/26/10(Fri)00:20 No.8791427
    >>8791346

    >Just that combat screen of harrier should have been alot more aggressive than they were.

    This. GM obviously removed the firing button from the yoke.
    >> Anonymous 03/26/10(Fri)00:21 No.8791445
    >>8791372
    Check sup/tg/, it was a "campaign story" about a Dark Heresy character who was fat, smart, and not combat prone, but "somehow" rolled extremely well whenever it mattered. Ridiculously well. So that he singlehandedly killed things way beyond his ability to. The first story bit wasn't unbelievable, just a random bit of awesome obscenely high luck; but as the stories kept rolling in it became obvious that it was made up.

    I think it got incorporated into a GW product somehow. That thread was also archived.
    >> Anonymous 03/26/10(Fri)00:25 No.8791490
    OP again,
    I took a near hit, my hydraulic pressure dipping immediately. I checked the engine gauges, punched into burner, and climbed out of there. Hugs was still trying to get a lock, finally getting one, launching an archer, but yet again the damn thing missed. Luckily Scotch and Biscuit came in, both launching two missiles, ripping one Harrier apart, before zooming by towards the rest of the force. The Tornado was closing on the AN-22, and also launched two sidewinders, one going wide but the other impacting the cargo harrier, setting an engine on fire quite badly. Sandman roared in from behind, having finally caught up, in a supersonic gun pass, stitching rounds across the sky, and hitting the Tornado. He saw some smoke and an ejection. Unfortunately, based on his angle, a few stray shells hit the antonov hull, causing some more damage, but nothing too serious luckily. Figuring he's be less than useless in a dogfight with Harriers, Sandy burner climbed, ECM still pumping out, although since everything was degenerating into a dogfight it seemed pointless.
    >> Anonymous 03/26/10(Fri)00:26 No.8791506
    >>8791427
    Again, read the thread, the Harriers were taken out BVR, and then the remaining ones fired when they could.
    >> Anonymous 03/26/10(Fri)00:26 No.8791509
    That Tornado pilot had balls of steel. I salute him.
    >> Anonymous 03/26/10(Fri)00:26 No.8791517
    >The Tornado was closing on the AN-22, and also launched two sidewinders, one going wide but the other impacting the cargo harrier, setting an engine on fire quite badly

    GOD DAMN IT
    >> Anonymous 03/26/10(Fri)00:27 No.8791528
    >>8791354
    These threads were better without the dumb troll.
    >> Anonymous 03/26/10(Fri)00:27 No.8791529
    >>8791490
    Hooray, hooray, what a wonderful day, for the PCs are invincible.
    >> Anonymous 03/26/10(Fri)00:27 No.8791531
         File1269577650.jpg-(78 KB, 750x600, 1246337382646.jpg)
    78 KB
    >>8791506

    Heads up!
    >> Anonymous 03/26/10(Fri)00:27 No.8791533
    >>8791509
    And he managed to punch out, which I think is excellent.
    >> Anonymous 03/26/10(Fri)00:28 No.8791545
    >>8791533
    What're the odds he was flipping off Sandy the whole way down?
    >> Anonymous 03/26/10(Fri)00:28 No.8791546
    Infinite missle code on?
    >> Anonymous 03/26/10(Fri)00:28 No.8791547
    >>8791528
    No series of threads can go this long without getting troll attention. It's amazing they've stayed as troll-free as they have so far.
    >> planefag 03/26/10(Fri)00:29 No.8791555
         File1269577740.jpg-(18 KB, 244x320, 1252464425680.jpg)
    18 KB
    >>8791509

    >That tornado pilot had balls of steel

    Completes his goddamned attack run after having the entire rest of his flight get pasted, nails the runway, and even gets a sidewinder off at an escaping transport? Jolly goddamn good, ol chap!
    >> Anonymous 03/26/10(Fri)00:29 No.8791568
    >>8791533
    He managed to punch out in a zone that is twelve minutes from being hit by a cruise missile.
    >> Skyhawk !c6DO1M4BMw 03/26/10(Fri)00:29 No.8791569
    So how many transports got out? 3? 4? When there were 9 or so aircraft that were supposed to evac the base? And now the runway's cratered and unusable.

    not good numbers.
    >> Anonymous 03/26/10(Fri)00:29 No.8791573
    >>8791509

    judging from what ive seen of him. that guy is going to land, walk/swim back to GB, grab a typhoon and hunt down OP's flight group.
    >> Anonymous 03/26/10(Fri)00:29 No.8791574
    >>8791547

    The other threads have been awesome. This... hasn't.
    >> Anonymous 03/26/10(Fri)00:30 No.8791580
    >>8791569
    I think 4 are in the air but one took engine damage and may or may not make it.
    >> Anonymous 03/26/10(Fri)00:30 No.8791586
    >supersonic gun pass

    xD
    >> Air Action Weekly 03/26/10(Fri)00:30 No.8791592
         File1269577855.jpg-(22 KB, 226x295, RAF_Ascension_crest.jpg)
    22 KB
    >>8791569

    Well The Company at least likely put the most valuable shit in the first few transports.
    >> Anonymous 03/26/10(Fri)00:31 No.8791601
    >>8791569

    Actually I thought a few transports had gotten away even before OP's flight picked up hostiles. And where did he say there were ten transports to get away, anyways? I thought it was more like four or five.
    >> Anonymous 03/26/10(Fri)00:31 No.8791602
    >>8791490

    You really are making this up arent you
    >> Anonymous 03/26/10(Fri)00:31 No.8791604
    >>8791568
    Motherfucker's got legs, or maybe he can land his shute in the drink and wait for some CSAR.
    >> Skyhawk !c6DO1M4BMw 03/26/10(Fri)00:32 No.8791608
    >>8791592
    >>8791580

    still...not a good day for the company if they've gotta leave behind over half the evac force.
    >> Anonymous 03/26/10(Fri)00:32 No.8791610
    >>8791509
    DFC for that guy.
    >> Anonymous 03/26/10(Fri)00:32 No.8791612
    >>8791490
    This is either not the OP or his shit's falling apart.
    >> Anonymous 03/26/10(Fri)00:32 No.8791616
    Dammit, I give up. 5:30 am. Heading to sleep. This thread better be here when I wake up!
    >> Anonymous 03/26/10(Fri)00:32 No.8791617
    >>8791592

    See

    >>8788092

    >We were told that the final personnel were now on their way to the waiting aircraft.

    The planes now taking off are the last ones. Presumably most of the merc force is already safely out of dodge.
    >> Anonymous 03/26/10(Fri)00:33 No.8791634
    >>8791601
    4 C-27J
    2 AN-12
    2 IL-76
    1 AN-22

    So 9 total.
    >> Anonymous 03/26/10(Fri)00:34 No.8791653
    >>8790119

    I think we're misinterpreting those Tornados. My guess is that the brits didn't epect aerial threats and that the Tornados were going for SEAD. Any bets that the last sattelite pass from the brits was just before the AA guns were packed up? :3
    >> Anonymous 03/26/10(Fri)00:35 No.8791662
    >>8791653
    >didn't expect aerial threats
    >mercenary airstrip

    lolno
    >> Anonymous 03/26/10(Fri)00:36 No.8791681
    >>8791574
    >The other threads have been awesome. This... hasn't.

    seconded.
    its just gone from awesome to "completely pants on head retarded".
    the tornado crew, on bieng picked up, will not simply be getting into typhoons to hunt them down... they'll be in the inquiry trying to explain why the RAF and fleet arm crews were replaced with exchange pilots from Turkmenistan.
    >> Anonymous 03/26/10(Fri)00:37 No.8791703
    >>8791681
    I still think that it's Steve being a little more forgiving than normal. Maybe he sensed that OP's group wasn't feeling too good after the last two clusterfucks and wanted to let them feel heroic.

    Or maybe OP's just making shit up. How the fuck should I know.
    >> Anonymous 03/26/10(Fri)00:38 No.8791723
    OP again
    Hugs finally had turned, just in time to see two sidewinders closing on him. He took a direct hit, which blew off a chunk of his tail and wrecked one of his engines. His return fire silenced the Harrier though. He also disengaged, climbing to meet me above the clouds. Biscuit and Scotch were now engaged, until their sidewinders ran dry. They took out one more Harrier, but the rest were getting through, and Biscuit paid for it, getting into a turning fight with one of the British pilots, and losing, suffering a heavy hit that almost smashed his aircraft out of the sky, and sending shrapnel through him and his backseater, killing the backseater. There really was no winning at this point, Scotch was fine, but heading back into that pack was murder. The gift didn't help, four Phoenix missiles arrived on scene, and missed every single Harrier they were aimed at. The harriers overflew the base, dumping there iron and cluster bombs, obliterating the remaining aircraft on the ground, the hangars, barracks, fuel dump. We climbed out, hoping that they wouldn't pursue, since we no longer had a speed advantage. They didn't seem interested in us, so we tailed the AN-22, noting that the fires had been extinguished, making sure none of the UK jets continued at us. We learned a big lesson, going toe to toe with superior numbers in a dogfight is a bad idea.
    >> Anonymous 03/26/10(Fri)00:38 No.8791724
    >>8791703
    Who cares?
    Though to be honest, I was hoping for more of a blaze of glory against Typhoons.
    >> Anonymous 03/26/10(Fri)00:39 No.8791733
    >>8791703

    Maybe we should just have the OP ask Steve why they had such an easy time with this mission?
    >> Air Action Weekly 03/26/10(Fri)00:41 No.8791773
    >>8791723

    Welp. I'd say it was a modest success.
    >> Anonymous 03/26/10(Fri)00:42 No.8791777
    >>8791723
    >Biscuit paid for it, getting into a turning fight with one of the British pilots, and losing, suffering a heavy hit that almost smashed his aircraft out of the sky, and sending shrapnel through him and his backseater, killing the backseater.

    So how long can he fly until he passes out from blood loss?
    >> Anonymous 03/26/10(Fri)00:42 No.8791781
    >>8791681
    >>8791574

    >Britfags upset their obsolete aircraft suffered instead of being LOL INVINCIBLE!

    It works both way, OPs group seems to be doing well, but that's expected in an RPG. It wasn't a fair or balanced fight in real life, so it sounds like they used their speed and BVR capability to advantage.

    I don't see a problem so far.
    >> Anonymous 03/26/10(Fri)00:42 No.8791785
    >>8791723
    Definitely made-up. You're trying to suddenly pile on the negativity because we're booing at what an easy time you're having.
    >> Anonymous 03/26/10(Fri)00:42 No.8791791
    >>8791723
    >four Phoenix missiles arrived on scene
    Where was that tomcat when you really needed him?
    >> Anonymous 03/26/10(Fri)00:43 No.8791798
    >>8791781
    Yeah, the BVR was the equalizer here. Turkey shoot initially.
    >> Anonymous 03/26/10(Fri)00:43 No.8791800
    >>8791723

    I like how every missle launched is a kill, but return missle hits are LOL JUST A FLESH WOUND
    >> Skyhawk !c6DO1M4BMw 03/26/10(Fri)00:43 No.8791801
    >>8791723
    see they're luck isn't good enough to get them through this without serious set backs. Hugs and Biscuit will probably need new aircraft after this and I doubt the company will be nice enough to give them new aircraft after this clusterfuck.
    >> Air Action Weekly 03/26/10(Fri)00:43 No.8791810
    >>8791785

    Oh shut up, I don't care if its made up, its interesting reading.
    >> planefag 03/26/10(Fri)00:43 No.8791811
         File1269578636.png-(79 KB, 407x405, 1250647734890.png)
    79 KB
    >>8791723

    >HEAVY DAMAGE TAKEN

    >EVERYBODY BARELY SURVIVED

    AWESOME

    Even WITH your aircraft shot to hell, GOD DAMN you're lucky to have survived. Also, when you get back to base with ships shot all to hell because you dove into a FURBALL against goddamn HARRIERS, nobody can say you didn't fight as hard as humanly possible.
    >> Anonymous 03/26/10(Fri)00:45 No.8791827
    >>8791810
    It's not interesting whatsoever.

    It's some twit who is loving his touch at writing fiction.
    >> Anonymous 03/26/10(Fri)00:45 No.8791829
    >>8791800
    op's missile strikes seem to be waves. Take the Tornados, ten missiles, four kills. And op says 'kill' doesn't mean flash of orange kablooie, the aircraft might simply disengage, mission kill.
    >> Anonymous 03/26/10(Fri)00:45 No.8791835
    >>8791785
    Actually it flows pretty well.

    OP went in hard and fast using superior speed and firepower to take out a good number of enemy strike fighters. Once they lost their BVR and speed advantage started having to maneuver the slower more nimble harriers were able to pick them apart and drive them off.

    It's like driving a car into a wall, you might punch a hole in the wall but then it's going to put your steering wheel through your chest.
    >> Air Action Weekly 03/26/10(Fri)00:45 No.8791843
         File1269578747.jpg-(269 KB, 1800x1428, F-20_firing_a_missile.jpg)
    269 KB
    >>8791800

    One of the Tornadoes took a missile hit and lived. So did a Mirage in an earlier mission. Besides, usually the Mercs use (and hit with) multiple missiles on a single target.

    Sidewinders (and most other close-range missiles) do 1d10 damage in the game and most aircraft have 6-8 Hitpoints, perfectly reasonable they can survive a hit.
    >> Anonymous 03/26/10(Fri)00:46 No.8791852
    Pretty sweet OP.
    Haters gonna hate.
    >> Anonymous 03/26/10(Fri)00:46 No.8791857
    >>8791827
    He's recounting a GAME dumbass. This was not a real military engagement, because, newsflash, MERCENARY AIR FORCES DON'T FUCKING EXIST. Take your britfag butthurt elsewhere.
    >> Anonymous 03/26/10(Fri)00:46 No.8791858
    To everyone going
    >LOL NOT REALISTIC
    This is an RPG, yes it is a fairly realistic one, but it's still a game. OP's group is enjoying the game. I'm enjoying the game. A lot of other readers are enjoying the game. If you aren't enjoying the game, hide the thread.
    >> Anonymous 03/26/10(Fri)00:46 No.8791859
         File1269578817.jpg-(260 KB, 1800x1166, McDonnell_XF-85_Goblin_USAF.jpg)
    260 KB
    >>8791546

    Not too bad. Could just be errors in the narration.

    So far, according to >>8791490, Biscuit just launched a magical extra Sidewinder. (He's launched 4 AMRAAMS and 5 Sidewinders from a loadout of 4 AMRAAM/ 4 AIM-9) He should be out of missiles now.

    Hugs has launched 8 missiles, don't know what his initial load was.

    Baron has 2 Sidewinders left, Scotch has 3.
    >> Anonymous 03/26/10(Fri)00:47 No.8791860
    >>8791785

    Actually it made sense. the group dominated while they had BVR and speed on their side. as soon as it became a furball numbers and the harriers unique capabilities tore the group a new one.
    >> Anonymous 03/26/10(Fri)00:47 No.8791861
    >>8791800
    They're the PCs, of course they're going to be more survivable.
    >> Air Action Weekly 03/26/10(Fri)00:48 No.8791881
         File1269578894.gif-(35 KB, 307x284, AC0 - Crow Squadron.gif)
    35 KB
    >>8791827

    I disagree with your opinion.

    You obviously don't like the thread. Hide it and move on. I'm sure there is some 40k, 3Evs4E or Wakfu shit going on.
    >> Anonymous 03/26/10(Fri)00:49 No.8791897
    >>8791785

    Got that feeling as well.
    >> Anonymous 03/26/10(Fri)00:49 No.8791898
    How much funds does OP's group have to repair of buy new planes?
    >> Anonymous 03/26/10(Fri)00:50 No.8791917
    >>8791898
    probably not much since they donated their haul last time to the Cruise ship survivors
    >> Air Action Weekly 03/26/10(Fri)00:51 No.8791922
         File1269579080.jpg-(503 KB, 949x3576, AC4 - Yellow 13.jpg)
    503 KB
    >>8791898

    IIRC OP himself has roughly 30mil. He is the richest of the group. I would guess the others are around 20-25.
    >> Anonymous 03/26/10(Fri)00:51 No.8791923
    >>8791917
    A bad idea in retrospect?
    >> Anonymous 03/26/10(Fri)00:51 No.8791930
    install this.

    https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/748

    then install this.

    http://userscripts.org/scripts/show/55385

    Hide trollposts. Profit!
    >> Anonymous 03/26/10(Fri)00:52 No.8791939
         File1269579135.jpg-(9 KB, 250x230, Tealc.jpg)
    9 KB
    >>8791923
    INDEED.
    >> Anonymous 03/26/10(Fri)00:52 No.8791940
    So let's get this straight: a bunch of slow, outdated fighters armed for strike roles take on a small group of fast multirole fighters loaded out for maximal anti-air firepower.
    The slow strike fighters take heavy losses, but manage to complete their mission regardless and deal some damage to the faster, heavier fighters.
    I don't see what the problem is.
    I mean, other than the British Navy's reliance on outmoded hardware.
    >> Anonymous 03/26/10(Fri)00:53 No.8791958
    >>8791940
    Slow yet highly maneuverable and far from outdated, taking on five rickety antiques.
    >> Anonymous 03/26/10(Fri)00:54 No.8791967
    and then the dragons flew in...

    about as plausible.
    >> Anonymous 03/26/10(Fri)00:55 No.8791977
    That Tornado pilot better get some writefaggotry love.
    >> Anonymous 03/26/10(Fri)00:55 No.8791980
    >>8791967
    I know.

    The PCs took out about twice their number, while being in a numerical disadvantage.
    >> planefag 03/26/10(Fri)00:55 No.8791986
    >>8791930

    Son of a bitch, this thing is like MAGIC.
    >> Anonymous 03/26/10(Fri)00:55 No.8791988
    >>8791958
    Rickety antiques outfitted with modern missiles made for exactly the kind of thing they're doing right now. And they used em, and now they're getting their asses handed to them.

    What are you complaining about?
    >> Air Action Weekly 03/26/10(Fri)00:55 No.8791991
         File1269579352.png-(105 KB, 300x300, AC0 - Wizard Squadron.png)
    105 KB
    If I have one critique of the RAF's performance in this mission its where the fucking Typhoons were?

    If they could send Tornadoes from Ascension why not send some genuine air superiority instead of relying on a few non-BVR capable Harriers?
    >> Anonymous 03/26/10(Fri)00:56 No.8791994
    >>8791977
    Writefaggotry about him being vaporized by a cruise missile five minutes after landing?
    >> Anonymous 03/26/10(Fri)00:56 No.8791997
    >>8791967

    STOP REMINDING ME OF WHEN I FIRST SAW THE REIGN OF FIRE POSTER AND WAS ALL FUCK YEAH APACHES DOGFIGHTING DRAGONS MUST WATCH

    FFFFFFFFUUUUUUUU
    >> Anonymous 03/26/10(Fri)00:56 No.8791999
    >>8791958
    >>flanker + 2 phantom 2000s
    >>rickety antiques
    Does not compute.
    >> Air Action Weekly 03/26/10(Fri)00:57 No.8792024
         File1269579472.jpg-(64 KB, 294x298, AC0 - Sorcerer Squadron.jpg)
    64 KB
    >>8791994
    He was moving away from the airstrip when he bailed, possibly for a good while before intercepting the AN-22.

    C.Missile hits aren't THAT big.


    Right?
    >> Anonymous 03/26/10(Fri)00:57 No.8792026
    op again
    As we climbed out, the Antonov told us it wouldn't make Kisangani, and was turning south towards Luanda. Hugs broke off with Biscuit to provide what cover they could, since they also planned to land in Angola. I formed up with Scotch who did a visual on me, telling me that I'd lost some control surfaces, and had some light smoke, but nothing major. We decided to head to Kisangani, and met up with the tanker. As they approached Luanda, Biscuit rolled poorly, and his remaining engine failed. He started a glide, but wasn't going to make it. He ejected over an open area, close to the main city, punching out, trying to keep the aircraft pointed away from the city. He didn't make it. His Phantom augered into the ground, followed by Biscuit tangled in a faulty parachute deployment. That REALLY sucked. Hugs rode what remained of his Flanker in to the field, sumping his munitions and fuel, and then having his leaft gear collapse on landing. His aircraft was damaged, but recoverable. Scotch, Sandy and myself landed at Kisangani with no incident.
    >> Anonymous 03/26/10(Fri)00:58 No.8792030
    >>8791988
    I'm complaining about the PCs going up against professional military pilots who outnumbered them four to one with equal, if not superior hardware.
    >> Anonymous 03/26/10(Fri)00:59 No.8792052
    >>8791980
    A numerical disadvantage against strike fighters equipped with bombs rather than air-to-air missiles, yeah.
    I still fail to see the problem.
    >> Anonymous 03/26/10(Fri)00:59 No.8792054
         File1269579572.jpg-(66 KB, 267x400, 1263834944191.jpg)
    66 KB
    >>8792026

    >His Phantom augered into the ground, followed by Biscuit tangled in a faulty parachute deployment. That REALLY sucked.

    AWWWWW GODDDDAAAAAAAAAMMIIIIIT
    >> Anonymous 03/26/10(Fri)01:00 No.8792061
    >>8791958
    far from outdated, and being flown, equipped and controlled by one of the top ten global airforces, whose pilots have miraculously lost all thier training, whose SIGINT Nimrod and E3 AWACs seems to have miraculously disappeared, and whose intelligence services seem to have gone on holiday for the week, and completely failed to remember that their target has those "small group of fast multirole fighters loaded out for maximal anti-air firepower"

    if it were the Moroccan airforce, or the likes, as in the earlier stories, It could be amazing. instead, its simply absurdly daft.
    >> Anonymous 03/26/10(Fri)01:00 No.8792062
    >>8792026
    BULLSHIT BULLSHIT BULLSHIT
    >> Anonymous 03/26/10(Fri)01:00 No.8792063
         File1269579623.jpg-(91 KB, 640x426, jam.jpg)
    91 KB
    >>8792026
    BISCUIT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    >> Anonymous 03/26/10(Fri)01:00 No.8792076
    >>8791991

    That's basically the biggest loophole.

    Real-world RAF might actually do that, but we don't have "mercenary air forces" flying modern air-to-air hardware in the real world.

    In-game RAF basically committed one of the worst intel fuckups since Pearl Harbor, or something. They'd be idiots NOT to expect air-to-air capability from the multiple mercenary companies they should KNOW to be operating in the area. (Since they've just been sent in to blow them the fuck up.)

    It's either a case of "whoops, all our fighters happened to be 2000 miles away that Tuesday," or "HURF BLURF OLD CHAP NO NEED FOR FIGHTARS." They had no business going in without an actual fighter screen, and even if they "won" this engagement, these kinds of losses will scuttle military careers.
    >> Air Action Weekly 03/26/10(Fri)01:01 No.8792079
    >>8792026

    Ouch, what a way to go...
    >> Anonymous 03/26/10(Fri)01:01 No.8792080
    >>8792026
    Biscuit... Is dead?

    DAMMIT.
    >> Anonymous 03/26/10(Fri)01:02 No.8792098
    >>8792062
    I don't believe Biscuit died either! He was in a phantom! That alone means he should be alive by virtue of the rule of cool.
    >> Anonymous 03/26/10(Fri)01:02 No.8792099
    >>8792026
    >>8791785

    lol
    >> Air Action Weekly 03/26/10(Fri)01:02 No.8792102
    >>8792076

    Well, if that informant hadn't been captured they would have caught the entire airbase unaware. Maybe they just got cocky.
    >> Anonymous 03/26/10(Fri)01:03 No.8792111
    >tangled 'chute

    BULLSHIT FUCK SHIT BULLSHIT
    >> Anonymous 03/26/10(Fri)01:03 No.8792112
    And that's....

    >>8792026

    how the biscuit crumbles.

    YYYEEEEAAAHHHH!!!!
    >> Anonymous 03/26/10(Fri)01:03 No.8792113
    >>8792026
    The worst way for a fighter pilot to go: smashed into the ground by his own ejection seat.
    >> planefag 03/26/10(Fri)01:03 No.8792119
    >>8792102

    This.

    That's why those Tornadoes were coming in hard and fast- they were supposed to shut the runway down hard before any interceptors got wheels-up.
    >> Anonymous 03/26/10(Fri)01:03 No.8792121
    >>8792030
    Hey dumbass, a harrier with Iron Bombs is going to lose against AMRAAMs from a distance. Everytime.
    >> Anonymous 03/26/10(Fri)01:04 No.8792124
    >>8792026
    Piling on the negativity too thickly. It's too obviously fake.

    Although, Biscuit does deserve to die, after being shot up that badly. What with all of the shrapnel in him.
    >> Anonymous 03/26/10(Fri)01:04 No.8792127
    >>8792026
    Aw man not Biscuit...sounds like you guys will need some recovery time and maybe a redeployment to another region after this.
    >> Anonymous 03/26/10(Fri)01:04 No.8792133
    >>8792102
    Or maybe is a fucking RPG and a game. One really can't expect too much of a realistic scenario, because then the game couldn't even happen at all. It's a god damned game and its expected that the PCs are more powerful, even in the face of foes that would rape them in real life.

    So the trolls just need to kindly go fuck themselves.
    >> Anonymous 03/26/10(Fri)01:05 No.8792139
    >>8792061

    This, especially the lack of support from co-ordinating aircraft is just bizzaire.
    >> Anonymous 03/26/10(Fri)01:05 No.8792141
    >>8792030
    >with equal, if not superior hardware.
    Harriers are not designed for air superiority, and these particular harriers lacked gun and BVR missile capacity (and radar for that matter). They were completely outmatched by that multirole J-36 and F-4's, and were complete shite compared to the Flanker.
    >> Anonymous 03/26/10(Fri)01:05 No.8792145
    >>8792111
    >>8792124

    How is it fake? The tables turned the moment the group was forced into a fight that they had no advantage in. If I'm honest, I would have launched the AMRAAMS, done one high speed pass, and then said "Fuck it, I'm done" and climbed out of there.
    >> planefag 03/26/10(Fri)01:05 No.8792146
         File1269579957.jpg-(73 KB, 511x480, 1248929847105.jpg)
    73 KB
    >>8792127

    >implying that they should take R&R instead of seek BLISTERING, HATEFUL VENGEANCE
    >> Anonymous 03/26/10(Fri)01:06 No.8792156
    NOOOOOO NOT BISCUIT.

    >>8792124
    lol dude, you are not fooling anyone and have already been proved wrong
    >> Anonymous 03/26/10(Fri)01:07 No.8792175
    >HURF BLURF OLD CHAP NO NEED FOR FIGHTARS

    It is now my goal in life to find a conversation in which I can use this wonderful wonderful phrase.

    Also:

    BISCUIT!

    NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
    >> Anonymous 03/26/10(Fri)01:08 No.8792177
    >>8792124
    A pilot full of shrapnel is too hurt to properly control his chute and dies in the process isn't really that far out of the realm of possiblity.
    >> Anonymous 03/26/10(Fri)01:08 No.8792182
         File1269580092.png-(11 KB, 150x148, 1230000378350.png)
    11 KB
    >>8792156
    >> Anonymous 03/26/10(Fri)01:09 No.8792203
    and in the next episode, Biscuit returns as the Phantom Phantom, and as ghostly avengers, the players defeat the entire USAF F22 fleet......
    >> Anonymous 03/26/10(Fri)01:09 No.8792204
    >>8792146

    Against the Royal Navy?
    >> Skyhawk !c6DO1M4BMw 03/26/10(Fri)01:09 No.8792207
    >>8792127
    >>8792146

    Hey hey I happen to agree man. The company would be pretty stupid not to ground and/or move the flight out of the area after this series of incidents.
    >> Anonymous 03/26/10(Fri)01:09 No.8792209
    >>8792145
    OP again,

    yeah, I am getting tired, I didn't write out the dogfight, but it ended up being a disaster, they boosted out of there, with missiles trailing after them. Biscuit and Scotch couldn't outturn the harriers who were pulling a vtol only maneuver all the time. We had actually discussed going back in, and decided it was worth a shot, since we had no clue what the 'gift' was, and our mission said protect the departing aircraft. I wish we would have just left, since we'd be in better shape.
    >> Anonymous 03/26/10(Fri)01:09 No.8792210
    Don't bother replying with the reasonable explanations I've seen so far about why OP's scenario is fine as a game; all the troll is doing in response is spamming "BULLSHIT". Obviously they have no real argument. Probably a butthurt Britfag.
    >> Anonymous 03/26/10(Fri)01:10 No.8792214
    >>8792177
    Exactly, hence the "deserves to die" part.
    >> planefag 03/26/10(Fri)01:10 No.8792222
    >>8792204

    They can line up RIGHT BEHIND THE LIBERIANS.

    >>8792207

    Well I guess they can bide their time. FOR NOW.
    >> Anonymous 03/26/10(Fri)01:11 No.8792228
    >>8791662
    Why not? They prolly expected the mercs to just get the fuck out of dodge, most valuable assets (read: The fucking fighter jets) going out first.

    >>8791800
    ou mean save for the fact that more than half the missile launches by OPs group didn't result in kills, either? Just shut up and get out, you fucking retard.

    For god's sake, they were having a turkey shoot at crappy subsonic strike fighters that don't even have air-intercept radars. OF COURSE, it's going to be a bloody reaping, given that every last plane in the OPs flight is superior to a Harrier GR.9 when it comes to air-to-air.

    >>8791958
    Five rickety antiques that are faster, better armed and equipped with better air-to-ar weaponry and sensor systems. Newsflash: The Harrier is also a "rickety antique". The GR.9 is just as shitty at air-to-air as the original version from the fucking late 60's, save for carrying newer version Sidewinders.

    >>8792030
    What equal or superior hardware? The British had NOTHING that was even equal to the fucking Aardvark in air-to-air performance.
    >> Anonymous 03/26/10(Fri)01:11 No.8792229
    >>8792146
    They need to repair their fighters (maybe replace the flanker if it's too expensive to repair), and find a new pilot to round out their wing.

    If they wanted to this could be a good reason to retire. If nothing else they'll need a while. And what manner of revenge can the wreak on the brits? Get shot up by some Typhoons?

    If anything this was revenge for sinking a cruise liner.
    >> Anonymous 03/26/10(Fri)01:11 No.8792230
    >>8792127
    You don't sit around and mope! Maverick did that he totally lost his shit for almost all the rest of the movie. No sitting around drinking from the sad glass while some sobby power ballad wails away in the background for you guys! You guys gotta get back on that horse and fuck it to death!
    >> Anonymous 03/26/10(Fri)01:12 No.8792249
         File1269580371.jpg-(5 KB, 102x111, spike.jpg)
    5 KB
    >>8792203
    "Believe in yourself, Scotch."
    >> Anonymous 03/26/10(Fri)01:13 No.8792250
    >>8792229
    Yes to all of this.

    Revenge? This WAS the revenge. You're even now. If they let you be.
    >> Anonymous 03/26/10(Fri)01:13 No.8792264
    >find a new pilot to round out their wing

    That flys a Skyhawk.

    Guns only.

    FINAL DESTINATION
    >> Anonymous 03/26/10(Fri)01:14 No.8792270
    >>8792209
    I enjoyed reading, OP. Even with the trolls.

    Might I suggest you type it out ahead of time for next thread?
    >> Anonymous 03/26/10(Fri)01:14 No.8792273
    I still want to know what's up with those damn HMMWV's a few missions back.
    >> Anonymous 03/26/10(Fri)01:15 No.8792281
    >>8792270
    >Might I suggest you type it out ahead of time for next thread?
    This. That way you can make sure that you've got all the details down and don't have any extra sidewinders flinging about. Might also make the narrative flow a little better.
    >> Anonymous 03/26/10(Fri)01:15 No.8792294
    >>8792273
    We'd probably be finding out now if a fucking cruise ship didn't get blown to hell last go around.
    >> planefag 03/26/10(Fri)01:15 No.8792295
    >And what manner of revenge can the wreak on the brits?

    That's a question you have to be very careful about asking me, because I have a fertile imagination. For instance, the maximum range of your average anti-shipping missile well-outstrips the range of ship-based SAMs.
    >> Air Action Weekly 03/26/10(Fri)01:16 No.8792304
         File1269580589.gif-(12 KB, 200x289, Black Hat logo.gif)
    12 KB
    >>8792270

    But that wouldn't be NEARLY as suspenseful.

    Also they should name their group the Black Hats.
    >> Anonymous 03/26/10(Fri)01:17 No.8792314
    >>8792295

    To say nothing of LGBs and embassy buildings.
    >> Anonymous 03/26/10(Fri)01:17 No.8792319
    >>8792304
    I'd counter-suggest the fortune hunters. But they're no Nathan Zachary.
    >> Anonymous 03/26/10(Fri)01:17 No.8792329
    >>8792270
    Op again
    Yeah, i plan too, this writing, find thread, writing, find thread stuff is annoying. I figured you guys liked this method since it gave you stuff to argue over as I put it in. I read all the comments, its really easy to throw holes at our plan, but when you're trying to keep your, very fragile, plane in one piece, and you have no clue what you are flying at (initiallyu) then its a diffrent game. I try to put tension into the mission recounts, but its hard to simulate what its like to be playing, watching all the contacts move around, seeing what is going where, wondering why, or what nasty stuff might be flying towards you.

    I'll also look back and see if I can find that missing sidewinder, I probably made a mistake, i can t take ntotes on everything.
    >> Anonymous 03/26/10(Fri)01:18 No.8792335
    >>8792314
    See if they do that then the brits stop fucking around and get the SAS involved or get some actual superiority fighters in the air. Ones that make the OP's wing look like pieces of shit.
    >> Anonymous 03/26/10(Fri)01:18 No.8792342
    >>8792329

    >this writing, find thread, writing, find thread stuff is annoying.

    type "noko" in the e-mail field (without the quotes) and you'll stay in the same thread. Profit!
    >> Anonymous 03/26/10(Fri)01:19 No.8792348
    >>8792329
    put noko in the email field and you don't need to re-find the thread.
    >> Anonymous 03/26/10(Fri)01:19 No.8792353
    >>8792061
    >far from outdated,

    For air-to-air, it's completely and utterly outdated. A fucking MiG-21 (and I don't mean any of the newer upgraded versions, either) has better ATA capabilities than the GR.9.

    >whose pilots have miraculously lost all thier training, whose SIGINT Nimrod and E3 AWACs seems to have miraculously disappeared, and whose intelligence services seem to have gone on holiday for the week, and completely failed to remember that their target has those "small group of fast multirole fighters loaded out for maximal anti-air firepower"

    Because modern day militaries and intelligence agencies never fail or miscalculate, amirite? As it looks, they Brits got fucked over by their informer getting caught and spilling the beans. Without that, those Tornados would have plastered the runway before ANYONE would have gotten out. And there was jack shit those Harrier pilots could have done better. They were completely outmatched in terms of equipment.
    >> Anonymous 03/26/10(Fri)01:20 No.8792365
    >>8792329
    All things considered, you do a great job with these. I appreciate you sharing the sessions with us.
    >> planefag 03/26/10(Fri)01:20 No.8792369
         File1269580848.png-(46 KB, 306x238, trollface.png)
    46 KB
    >>8792335

    That's the point.

    The Brits will mobilize the SAS, the best fighters they have, and every naval asset in the area-

    after their Embassy is nailed by a fighter painted in Liberian markings.
    >> Anonymous 03/26/10(Fri)01:21 No.8792374
    >>8792369
    This. Plan. Is. Awesome.
    >> Anonymous 03/26/10(Fri)01:21 No.8792377
    >>8792369
    Or a mechanic walks away from OP's phantom as OP climbs in and hits the ignition, at which point the plane explodes in a ball of flame and some SAS guy calls in for pickup.
    >> Skyhawk !c6DO1M4BMw 03/26/10(Fri)01:22 No.8792385
    Well considering the odds you did better than I expected OP...even with the loss of Biscuit and a good majority of the transports.

    I am looking forward to seeing the results from this in the next session.
    >> Anonymous 03/26/10(Fri)01:23 No.8792394
         File1269580987.jpg-(1.63 MB, 3072x2048, 1247937040146.jpg)
    1.63 MB
    >>8792335

    Whaddya mean, just the Brits? That's about six hours after the NATO charter becomes relevant. US carrier group shows up, bombers start doing runs from Missouri and Europe just to drop B-52 payloads on anything resembling a merc airfield, Rangers, Marines, knives, sharp sticks...
    >> Anonymous 03/26/10(Fri)01:23 No.8792401
         File1269581035.jpg-(11 KB, 500x300, JC Denton.jpg)
    11 KB
    >>8792377
    IT'S A BOMB!
    >> Anonymous 03/26/10(Fri)01:24 No.8792404
    >>8792394
    Or a pair of raptors jump them as they enter an engagement zone and no one is any wiser.
    >> sukhoi !KJHro3/ISM 03/26/10(Fri)01:28 No.8792446
    Well damn, I pop out for dinner and come back and this is what remains...

    My two cents: OP did better than expected. The use of range advantage and speed advantage was textbook to the point of wondering if Steve may have helped them out there. The field was bombed to hell, as I expected with that big of a force bearing down on it. No way they could have defended completely against it.

    And Biscuit deserved to die, Scotch as well but to a lesser extent, for taking those jets into a turning fight with Harriers.

    I'm also surprised that so many of Hugs missiles missed...
    >> Anonymous 03/26/10(Fri)01:30 No.8792470
    So, an ace is still like five kills, isn't it?

    Have any of you unrestrained bad boys aced yet?
    >> Anonymous 03/26/10(Fri)01:30 No.8792472
    >>8792394

    >implying the NATO charter was ever relevant

    sad to say, yeah. Also, alternate universe, with rampant use of Mercs commonplace. Much more likely that they'd pay off a rival group to attack them.
    >> planefag 03/26/10(Fri)01:31 No.8792492
    >I'm also surprised that so many of Hugs missiles missed...

    Their ships might have been shit-tier, but their ECM pods clearly weren't.
    >> Anonymous 03/26/10(Fri)01:33 No.8792514
    >>8792472

    Yeah, the US tends to be really shy about blowing up shit in third-world countries, especially when nice white people in embassies and civilian ships are getting splattered.

    Over the years the use of NATO allies for offensive missions outside of Western Europe has actually exceeded the requirements of the charter considerably.
    >> sukhoi !KJHro3/ISM 03/26/10(Fri)01:36 No.8792544
    Forgot to add, for everyone talking about the British going in unprepared.

    I'm getting the vibe that they didn't have the best intel, suspected it would be a stealth strike, and rushed the job because they wanted to hit the field NOW! That would explain the lack of Typhoons, since deploying a unit takes time. I wouldn't be surprised if the Tornado's happened to be on Ascension, and were therefor thrown into the mix to back up the Harrier flight. Based on the British action, it appears their plan was to come in hot with the Tornados, wrecking the runway and planes on the ground as well as air defense. The Harriers would mop up stragglers, and then cruise missiles would finish the job. Token defensive support was given to the Harriers, but they were not air to air platforms, at least, not initally.
    When the Tornados saw the radar hits, they dove for the deck. The plan fell apart there, especially when the Aardvark forced the Tornados to take longer to get there.

    Classic military fuck up. Read about the Bay of Pigs, Grenada, Maginot line, etc. Assumptions are the death of a good plan.
    >> Anonymous 03/26/10(Fri)01:36 No.8792553
    >>8792514

    To say nothing of the Humvee SAM variants...
    >> Anonymous 03/26/10(Fri)01:36 No.8792554
         File1269581818.gif-(1.3 MB, 200x150, kid dance.gif)
    1.3 MB
    >>8792369
    I love you so much. This is the best trolling ever. I have to remember this trick as a PC.

    Also, OP you guys should video tape one of your sessions. It would be awesome, and would get 9000+ hits on youtube from /tg/ alone.
    >> Anonymous 03/26/10(Fri)01:37 No.8792567
    >>8792544
    Of course the Tornado pilot still managed to get his job done and hit a flying transport like a badass motherfucker.
    >> planefag 03/26/10(Fri)01:40 No.8792599
    >>8792544

    >Classic military fuck up. Read about the Bay of Pigs, Grenada, Maginot line, etc. Assumptions are the death of a good plan.

    Pretty much. They should have bugged out back towards friendly naval SAM cover once they knew that interceptors were airborne, and they had no BARCAP.
    >> Anonymous 03/26/10(Fri)01:41 No.8792623
         File1269582092.jpg-(1008 KB, 2665x1777, XL472-Gannet.jpg)
    1008 KB
    >>8792544

    Right, which makes it a career-ending, courts-of-inquiry fuckup rather than LOL EASYMODE.

    Like I've posted before, in the real world the Brits could have expected to pull that off. In this mercland world, they absolutely would be aware that the sort of mercs they'd be flying in to attack are flying modern air-to-air craft like SU-27s and F-18s, and should have planned accordingly.

    It might be a 'realistic' moment of military idiocy, but it's still idiocy.
    >> Anonymous 03/26/10(Fri)01:42 No.8792638
    >>8792514
    The traditional US response to this kind of thing is eternal escalation. We've got the biggest military budget in the world, and we welcome the opportunity for anyone try to out spend up on the battlefield. If a flock of harriers don't work, we'll just zerg rush them with five billion worth of f-35 magic coming off of any of our huge ass supercarriers.
    >> sukhoi !KJHro3/ISM 03/26/10(Fri)01:43 No.8792645
    >>8792567
    I can see him in his cockpit going FUCK. THIS. SHIT.

    >>8792329
    OP, everyone on this board is an aviation 'expert'. Take their comments with a grain of salt. I like what you do, if nothing else you provide me with entertainment. The missions are awesome in their scope. Considering how boring most air combat is (there is no cover, no buildings, line of sight, its just spot and shoot, hop missile hits) these missions have enough twists and situations in them to make them constantly interesting. I also think it's awesome that Steve doesn't let you off the hook when you bug out, forcing you to deal with ongoing damage until you land.

    Anyway, keep it up, just write it all out at once next time.
    >> planefag 03/26/10(Fri)01:45 No.8792688
    >>8792554

    I do try.

    Now you have to remember that these boys are throwing around 25-30 mil apiece, and even with the hefty repair bill they'll be getting, it's not hard to bribe the hell out of somebody in Africa with five-hundred thousand dollars, or even fifty-thousand.

    If they really went all-out they could hire some local low-tier mercenaries- ones that operate prop-powered CAS aircraft- and give them some bullshit honkey-dookey mission- and then have one of their own pilots in a cheaply-bought A-1 Skyraider with the appropriate markings nail the embassy.

    Then it's a simple matter of a false paper trail leading straight to the Liberians. If they drop a few hundred thousand bucks on document forgers, so much the better.

    The SAS would figure that out, you say. MI-5 would cotton to that, you say. But with a sunk destroyer, a sunk CRUISE SHIP, and now a huge military disaster in which a big British strike force took embarrassingly huge casualties, the politicians will be screaming for action NOW.

    And the best part? The best fucking part? British intelligence has precedent to believe that the Liberians would take such an act through mercenaries, because they probably know who hired Black Flag to run the Morrocan crown prince kidnap.

    Yee-mother-fucking-haw.
    >> Skyhawk !c6DO1M4BMw 03/26/10(Fri)01:46 No.8792692
    >>8792645

    here here...
    >> Anonymous 03/26/10(Fri)01:47 No.8792723
    >>8792688
    I seriously think escalating this is a terrible idea. But it's OP's call.
    >> Anonymous 03/26/10(Fri)01:50 No.8792747
    >>8792688
    This is brilliant. I wish I could set up entire third world countries to be the fall guys for my plans in my games.
    >> Anonymous 03/26/10(Fri)01:51 No.8792769
    >>8792688

    I do hope OP is taking notes.
    >> sukhoi !KJHro3/ISM 03/26/10(Fri)01:52 No.8792784
         File1269582726.jpg-(73 KB, 720x540, 986TGN_James_Tolkan_001.jpg)
    73 KB
    Wow, I'm reading all the troll/hate comments. It sounds like people who have never played a game before.

    I enjoy hardcore flight sims. I play LOMAC, Falcon 4.0, from time to time. I know that what happens in these games that we are told isn't always realistic.

    But I defy anyone on this board, to build a realistic modern air combat RPG set in today's world, wherein the players feel like they contribute to the world, the game is enjoyable for all participants, and the combat is exciting and engaging while still being realistic. Real tactics, real political issues, real missions. And like I said, it has to be fun and believable.

    I admire the game op plays, hell, I want to be in it, because it sounds like a bunch of guys getting togehter for two hours every few days to munch on chops, drink beer, and talk like Maverick and Goose. And then come online and share the tale with us.

    And what more could you possibly want?
    >> Anonymous 03/26/10(Fri)01:52 No.8792800
         File1269582778.jpg-(193 KB, 1322x856, Northrop_F-5E_(Tail_No._11419)(...).jpg)
    193 KB
    >>8792645
    >>8792692

    Plussity-plus to this. I might be tallying your missiles-fired for lulz, but this is good reading. It's fun to armchair-general, but that's all it is. Keep up the good work.
    >> Anonymous 03/26/10(Fri)01:58 No.8792876
    >>8792784
    I tried making a space combat system for d20 future that was mostly realistic.

    It didn't end well.
    >> Air Action Weekly 03/26/10(Fri)01:59 No.8792900
         File1269583194.png-(14 KB, 350x350, RAF Roundel.png)
    14 KB
    So other than Sukhoi's one solitaire game, has anyone else tried a game of Airwar:C21?
    >> Anonymous 03/26/10(Fri)02:01 No.8792929
         File1269583314.png-(60 KB, 320x320, 1266148666542.png)
    60 KB
    >>8792784

    >I enjoy hardcore flight sims. I play LOMAC

    I WILL NOT BEG FOR PICS I WILL NOT BEG FOR PICS I WILL NOT BEG FOR PICS.....

    >Wow, I'm reading all the troll/hate comments.

    Don't sweat them too much. It's some of the most hilariously obvious samefagging/trolling I've seen. If he knew what he was doing, he would have... ah, but why give him ideas.
    >> sukhoi !KJHro3/ISM 03/26/10(Fri)02:02 No.8792940
    All that being said, I've noticed how the troll has left, and the rational people remain. The thread has returned to being just awesome. We're well past 400 posts, which is some sort of record, definitely for one of these.

    I'm not sure if OP succeeded in his mission though. Both IL-76 and the AN-22 made it out. Both Cubs died, and two? C-27s. All told, that's not bad, if the other C-27s made it out. Better than half in numbers and well over half in terms of carrying capacity. The British took a beating, although I don't think their Harrier group lost many pilots. The biggest force changer was the BVR shot on the Tornados. Used a lot of BVR on that one shot, but it payed off rather well. The lack of short range follow up hurt the group.
    >> Anonymous 03/26/10(Fri)02:07 No.8792991
    I'm really looking forward to seeing where this goes from here. And I really want to try and get a game of this going with my group, but I'm the only airplane lover in it.
    >> planefag 03/26/10(Fri)02:08 No.8793001
    >>8792940

    Think they did the best they could on the short-range, really. High-energy passes on the Harriers with their heat-seekers. Where they made the mistake was slowing down and getting dragged down into the furball, which is where they got their asses shot off.
    >> Anonymous 03/26/10(Fri)02:08 No.8793003
    >>8790757
    They do not have Beyond Visual Range Missiles.
    >> Anonymous 03/26/10(Fri)02:08 No.8793013
    And sukhoi arrives, and is the voice of reason...

    For someone with an irrational love for Russian tech, you seem amazingly level headed.
    >> Anonymous 03/26/10(Fri)02:09 No.8793015
    I salute you Tornado Pilot , I would give you the Distinguished Flying Cross.
    >> teka 03/26/10(Fri)02:11 No.8793043
    >>8793013
    probably some type of nuclear powered, vac-tube processing head leveling device.

    (russian mil surplus, new in box, 3 for $5 on ebay)
    >> Anonymous 03/26/10(Fri)02:11 No.8793048
    >>8793015
    agreed, that guy was bloody brilliant.
    >> sukhoi !KJHro3/ISM 03/26/10(Fri)02:15 No.8793093
    >>8793003
    I think a lot of the "WTF, why Harriers no shoot!" crowd had no clue of the tactical situation. Based on the posted debrief, it seems like a small line of Harriers formed to be between the mercs and the main strike package, keeping a few others inside the strike package for any other threats.

    Op didn't do a run against 14+ Harriers, they did it against, what sounds like four of them.

    Added to that, most people don't understand sidewinder range, and the physics of air combat. Missiles have a short burn time. They might have a 'range' of 13 miles, but if you're at a speed disadvantage and a bad angle, your effective range might only be 4 miles. Just reading through the Air War book quickly, I note all the missile modifiers that make it easier to miss with them. And for the silver bullet argument, several times the pcs missiles failed to lock, so it wasn't as lopsided as many seem to think it was.

    Man, it is actively irking me that people don't understand basic physics, how can they expect to understand the difficulty of air combat?
    >> Anonymous 03/26/10(Fri)02:15 No.8793100
    >>8793043
    speaking of which
    http://www.sovietarmystuff.com/
    >> Anonymous 03/26/10(Fri)02:16 No.8793110
    >>8793093
    I was originally one of those people until I read that they were GR9's and not Sea Harriers or Harrier II's.
    >> sukhoi !KJHro3/ISM 03/26/10(Fri)02:20 No.8793154
    >>8793100
    AHHHH!

    http://www.sovietarmystuff.com/Product_587_Zsh-3_Soviet_Pilot_Flight_Helmet_%2B_Km-32_Oxygen_Mask.ht
    ml

    MUST! HAVE!
    >> Anonymous 03/26/10(Fri)02:21 No.8793176
    Shit guys, I know realism is one thing, but just having the OP and friends get completely destroyed would suck pretty fucking hard and end the game. Steve probably just wants them to learn a lesson for being so damned trigger happy previously. Stop complaining and come back next week when OP and crew get back to dropping napalm in civilian concentrated areas.
    >> planefag 03/26/10(Fri)02:24 No.8793219
    >>8793093

    >Man, it is actively irking me that people don't understand basic physics, how can they expect to understand the difficulty of air combat?

    THIS.

    Whenever I try to patiently explain to HURF DURF TURN RATE people that the hard left flat turn is, in fact, not the end-all and be-all of air combat manuvering, I am inevitably met with a derp quotient truly terrible to behold.

    The real riot is that people who should know better do the same damn thing. I've seen HERR LUFTWAFFE fanboys on message boards claim, with a straight face, that the Bf-109 could out-turn the P-40 AND the P-51, and if they're feeling especially bold they'll even set their sighs on the goddamn Spitfire.
    >> Anonymous 03/26/10(Fri)02:25 No.8793225
    >>8793176
    A bit of the issue was that they seemed to be doing so damn well in the beginning. Which is kind of not normal. At all.

    Of course once they used up their advantages they got whipped proper.
    >> sukhoi !KJHro3/ISM 03/26/10(Fri)02:34 No.8793362
    >>8793219
    No shit? Damn, that's pretty fucking stupid, padonez mon francais. I'm more a modern person, so for me it's about reading on BVR combat missile effectiveness, optimum shots, etc. I don't think there's been an actual combat test of sidewinders fired from slow aircraft at Mach 2 jets, but the basic physics makes me think that in a tail flight, it'd be at best a 30% to hit. Getting back to turn rate, people who tell me the F-16 can out turn a given plane bother me in the same way. Sure, the F-16 can whip through some very tight turns, but how much airspeed does it lose? Does it have power to maintain a hard turn? How fast does it have to be to pull off that turn? When does it stall out? How long into the turn before the AOA stalls out the wing? Air Combat is not easy, they spend most of fighter training teaching pilots how to answer these questions. Someone off the street has almost zero chance of understanding all the variables in a simple guns only dogfight, let alone a missile turn and burn.

    >>8793225
    I saw that as well. But it makes sense. BVR shots from a distance against strike aircraft are going to hurt. Heck, Steve probably noticed them running with their noses cold, so when Hugs threw the usual plan out the window and turned on his radar, it alerted the trap ship below, which went active almost immediately. A turn or two more and they might have both been trying to avoid a flurry of SAMs from that UK carrier escort. Hell, if they'd tried to sink the carrier I bet they'd all be toast by now.

    They stuck to the mission, protect the transports, and it payed off.
    >> Anonymous 03/26/10(Fri)02:38 No.8793402
    >And sukhoi arrives, and is the voice of reason...

    2/10
    >> Anonymous 03/26/10(Fri)02:45 No.8793482
    man, not looking forward to the costs and AAR on this once.

    bravo to OP and his group for doing as well as they did thou.
    >> planefag 03/26/10(Fri)02:46 No.8793492
    >>8793362

    >Sure, the F-16 can whip through some very tight turns, but how much airspeed does it lose?

    Exactly. That's where differences in instantaneous turn and sustained turn comes into play, to say nothing of aerodynamic efficiency. That's why the P-51 was such a good turner despite it's relatively higher wing-loading- it was such a clean ship that it's "corner speed" was fairly high, letting it whip around the turn faster. Some more draggy planes turn at slower speeds, meaning their turn RATE is slow, but their turn RADIUS is fairly tight, which complicates things further (the F-4U comes to mind there.)

    Frankly, the aerodynamics of turns are so complex that I still don't quite understand it, and I've made a study of it. There's something called "parasite drag" that is so hard to mathematically quantify that actual turn performance (among other things) still requires wind tunnel testing to properly document, supercomputer models be damned.

    And like you say, missile engagements are similarly complex. Lots of people think you just point the missile and pull the trigger. In a turn'n'burn you have to manuver for a missile shot much like you do with guns.
    >> Air Action Weekly 03/26/10(Fri)02:55 No.8793585
         File1269586507.jpg-(68 KB, 640x480, bandb_16.jpg)
    68 KB
    >>8793492
    >Lots of people think you just point the missile and pull the trigger.

    I refuse to believe that, but I know its true. Deflection angles are a bitch, doesn't matter if you're firing .50 cals or a Sidewinder.
    >> Anonymous 03/26/10(Fri)02:59 No.8793634
    >>8792329
    >>8792329

    So did OP abandon us, or are we going to get a 'summary' (losses, kills, etc) tonight?
    >> Anonymous 03/26/10(Fri)03:01 No.8793659
    >>8793634
    He said he was tired so we may have to wait until next thread.
    >> Noisolpxerd 03/26/10(Fri)03:01 No.8793661
    I thought Vietnam taught people that the "HEY GUISE, I HEARD MISSILES ARE MAGIC AND WILL HIT ANYTHING YOU SHOOT THEM AT ALL THE TIME." mentality doesn't work.
    >> Noisolpxerd 03/26/10(Fri)03:09 No.8793769
    >>8793661

    Also, in b4 R550 Magic.
    >> Anonymous 03/26/10(Fri)03:13 No.8793817
    >>8793659
    >>8793659

    Dammit, I just want to know what's going to happen to the group after all the damage they've taken and Biscuit biting it.
    >> sukhoi !KJHro3/ISM 03/26/10(Fri)03:17 No.8793859
    I'm getting pretty tired, think I'll head off as well. Maybe we'll see those tallies tomorrow if we are lucky.

    >>8793661
    No, it really hasn't. Sound objective analysis of missiles today is very difficult to come by. Most of the information involved is propaganda from the manufacturers. And talking about these missile ranges and such with people online is a joke.
    >> Air Action Weekly 03/26/10(Fri)03:17 No.8793863
         File1269587834.jpg-(109 KB, 600x900, Real Life Solo Wing Pixy.jpg)
    109 KB
    You know, poking through the "Mercenary Air Squadron" rules that were posted a thread or two before AW:C21, they look kind of amusing. Not nearly as realistic or indepth as AW:C21, but neat looking in their own right. It has some interesting "management" aspects to it.

    Plus it can potentially be played solitaire.
    >> Noisolpxerd 03/26/10(Fri)03:58 No.8794230
    >>8793863

    In reference to your picture, I love how he didn't even realize he was missing a wing until after he landed.
    >> Air Action Weekly 03/26/10(Fri)04:00 No.8794240
         File1269590406.jpg-(114 KB, 1600x525, Solo Wing Pixy.jpg)
    114 KB
    >>8794230


    IIRC the fuel spray blocked the view when he originally looked, so he figured it was merely mangled.
    >> Fligh/tg/uy 03/26/10(Fri)04:52 No.8794657
         File1269593532.jpg-(39 KB, 409x307, sr-71_2.jpg)
    39 KB
    Goddamnit, missed another one...



    [Return]
    Delete Post [File Only]
    Password
    Style [Yotsuba | Yotsuba B | Futaba | Burichan]