>>8365780
With qulifications, maybe.

Like best tactical low scale modern game.

>>8365780
Wrong.

>>8365780
Awesome.

>>8365820
Awesomer.

M1 Abrams vs Zombies, can this be done?

>>8365994
YEs, although vehicles cost double in a zombies game.

M1 Abrams driven by Zombies, can this be done?

sorry still pissed at Mongoose for completely mishandling Starship Troopers.

Sell me on this game, otherwise... DO NOT WANT.

>>8367486
Well M1s can drive over zombies

>>8367630
The rules are well thought out, there are a plethora of 15mm figures to buy, there is a surprising community on TG, and the system plays fast enough that it's enjoyable, yet brutal enough that thinking tactically is vital to success (not just luck)

Factions and units are well-done, too. I just wish they'd include picture related

>>8368317
which game?

hmm I think I could use WF greatcoats and (horribly detailed) zombies for a Apoc Z game

>>8368317
Some guy made the unit already.

Is there any way to play this online?

I love to play, but the only way I could would be online.

>>8368873
Crap, forgot my message. So I saw a few days ago that someone homebrewed Canada for Battlefield Evolution, but I'd like to see Mexico represented. Any tips?

>>8368880
There's some guy modding Vassal.

>>8368880
hmm I would assume you could program Vassal
dont give me that face back then in the 80s everyone who used a computer could program something!

>>8368895
Well, the guys who made the Canada list were Canadians, so they knew their stuff. That being said, wikipedia would be a place to start, and then you just look at what is already in the book and go from there.

>>8368895
mexico?

use the MEA list

lollololololloolololol

>>8368901
Really? Awesome. Assuming Vassal comes back up again that is...

>>8368867

>>8368933
Oh shit!

I laughed

But seriously though, I think someone should. Mexico even has their own indigenous assault rifle, and all that battling drug lords has got to train up some fierce urban combat troops

>>8368997
Do you know how surprised I was to find that Mexico had an air force and a navy?

>>8368997
>talking about mexico, posts pic of israeli tank
wtfman.jpg
pic is a real mexican tank

>>8369025

Where are the missile pods?

>>8369025
it launches people over the US border

Battlefield evo

>>8369181
YOU KNOW ITS NAME! NOW PLAY THE GAME!

>>8370128
Take your fake ace combat shit elsewhere.

>>8370183
PAK-FA does not approve

>>8370183
Dumbass. The Sukhoi T-50 is the most advanced and deadliest aircraft ever made. It's got the US military shitting its pants.

>>8370247
>>8370128

Christ, it's like a Raptorski! Like a Flanker on Stealth steroids mixed up with a big batch of FUCK YEAR!

>>8370288
seriously, it's like they took a F-22, said "ok, what parts of this look awesome?", and then copy/pasted said bits onto an Su-37

>>8370247
F22 raptor he-

fuck

>>8370247
Now if they had the military budget to make use of them.

>>8370247
>hurrdurr I r russian

I'm be surprised if the thing doesn't fall apart in shakedown

>>8370419
You got it the wrong way around, bro. It's US planes that can't handle a bit of rain (lol F22), and Russian ones that you could probably maintain with a regular jackoff keep-in-your-car-just-in-case toolkit.

>>8370419
Say what you want about Russian technology, Unreliable is not something most people say about their planes/tanks.

>>8370419
Have you ever seen russian military equipment? shit is built to last forever with pretty much basic tools.

>>8370314
Which is why it is awesome. None of the suck of the F-22, all of the awesome of it. Wrapped up with the most ridiculous maneuverability of any production plane ever created. I can't wait until the Indian Air Force fields this badass.

I don't understand how the Russians consistently make the best planes in terms of aesthetics...

>>8370540

>Implying the F-14 isn't the most badass looking plane ever.

That's one reason I play Russians in BE. Reliable force, just like a mace to the face

>>8370540
Shit, I see some Tomcat in that plane as well.

F-22 Angles, Sukhoi tail boom, FA-18 super hornet inlets, F-14 canted engine booms, Flanker burners, YF-23 tail.

It's every awesome plane (well, not the F-18) thrown together.

>>8370540
Just SU, not MiG.

>>8370540
lolno

Here's the underbelly, note the fuckhuge weapon bay.

how does this MARINES list look?

175-Rifle Squad
175-Rifle Squad
175-Rifle Squad
275-Super Cobra
100-Predator UAV
100-Predator UAV

1000pts

>>8370607
Mig-25/31 look very cool, and you can't deny that the Fulcrum isn't a sexy beast.

I'm sure it'll come out soon enough that it's actually a terrible plane and all that stuff. It's the general course of action that gets followed whenever some new piece of tech comes out. Good on the Russians though for trying to keep up with the west in the arms race.

>>8370419
American planes require CLEAN airfields, requiring FOD (foreign object damage) walks every morning to make sure nothing can get sucked up into the very delicate engines.

Russian planes are designed to take off unpaved runways.

>>8370673

Not going to take a Command Section?

>>8370673
Honestly it looks like sniper and artillery bait to me.

Also, 1000 lbs bombs. Your only AA is that Cobra...

...Does the Cobra have AA? Let me check.

>>8370689
Considering most of the 'West' not on the Eurofighter or Rafale will be buying the JSF, and the standard export SU-35 Flanker is already flying and cheaper, I think it's the west that will fall behind.

>>8370674
I love Russian planes, but why the fuck are it's engines so smoky?

>>8370619
Warthog is ugly you dumbfuck.
But it's abilities are fucking AWESOME

Fuck yeah, Russian aircraft. I always found the Hind to be the most aesthetically pleasing copter, despite the rep from the Soviet-Afghan war.

>>8370733
Like Eastern planes ever achieved greater than 0.2:1 kill ratios in modern warfare against Western ones. Not since the GPW, man.

>>8370746
Because Russian jet fuel most likely has twigs and leaves in it. But the engine can still take it.

>>8370757
>ugly

YOU BEST BE TROLLING

>>8370733

You should probably check your numbers and stats. The Su-35 is in no position to dethrone anything the West is using. The F35 is awful though, glad my country isn't buying 'em.

>>8370762
Too bad the HIND isn't in Battlefield Evo. =(

Yes, the Cobra has 2x AIM9x Sidewinders.

But all planes have 2x AA missiles as well, so...pray you go first in the Air Phase.

>>8370766
name a country that has/had Su-37's that has been up against a western military recently

Afghanistan and Iraq where flyion old soviet era stuff

>>8370762
You mean the one where it can still fly to base as long as the engine and the prop are intact? There is a picture of one shot to hell and landing on a landing strip. It is so riddled with holes you can see clearly whats on the other side.

>>8370777
That is a wonderful mental image. Yuri, change the damn fuel filter, it's full of leaves and sap again

>>8370766
As a participant in the recent Red Flag exercise when India brought it's old gen Sukhois out, and then proceeded to wipe the floor with anything that was thrown at them in a non E3 environment, yeah, I think you are talking out your ass.

>>8370800

It's easy enough to add rules. And the communtiy here is pretty active in that. All you need to do is comparse and contrast the rules for whatever country you want to the standards and then go from there. Everything is close enough that it's not too difficult.

>>8370673
>no A10's

you are not an american

>>8370762
The Hind actually did quite well in Afghanistan, as did the HIP, right up until the CIA started putting next-gen stingers in theatre...

Blackhawks etc don't have that problem right now, because the battery packs on the 'donated' stingers ran out years ago.

>>8370733
>Buying the JSF
>Implying that the fucking thing will ever get finished, or outfly the F-14 when it does

>>8370876
saw this on another board

"HIND Stats.
Points: 375
Size: 6
Move: V/STOL/Loiter
Close Combat: 3xD10
Target: 6+
Armour: 3+/6+
Kill: 10+
Hits: 4 Multifire/2

Weapons:
Kord 12.7mm Chin Gun (Front/Left/Right)
Eight S-24 Rockets
Sixteen S-8 Rockets
Four AT-16

Transport: Eight Size 1 models
Linked Triggers: A Hind may fire two identical weapons systems for 1 shoot action (I didn't feel like writing this out four times)
Gun Pods: A Hind may replace the S-24 Rockets for GsH-23L Cannon Pods for +0 points. (3xD6+1, Auto, Piercing/2, 36") "

>>8370914
Just as planned.

>>8370876
I need some links to this community then. Battlefield Evo's main site is taken up of mostly non-Modern Combat threads, and the Battlefield Evo off-site forum is full of posts from 2007.
>>8370883
It's okay, it's okay...Predators are amazing. Extra reaction AND those Hellfire IIs are amazing.

>>8370972
http://s1.zetaboards.com/BannedLoserz/forum/1442197/

>>8370930
A helicopter with Loiter? I don't think so. That's a bit too fast.

>>8370972
I know of this small one

why not join to help out?

http://s1.zetaboards.com/BannedLoserz/forum/1442197/

>>8371005

Loiter is the same speed the rest of the helicopter have. Hover and loiter. It's the second slowest speed in game for air vehicles.

>>8371005
The Hind is one of the fastest helicopters on earth, the little stub wings provide a lot of lift when moving at speed, allowing the rotor/engine to provide more to forward propulsion then lift.

>>8371029
Oh. Whoops. :$ You are right.

>>8371072

.....It's a tabletop wargame....

>>8370288
>Raptorski!
laughed pretty good

Better than the F-22

>>8371083
Oh. Upon further inspection, you seem to be correct.

>>8371161

It says so on the fucking image for Christs sake.

God Bless those Godless COmmie Bastards.

>>8371172
He apologized with Jezzer, all is forgiven.

Sukhoi Monogatari Aniki

>>8370575
>Implying the F-14 isn't the most badass looking plane ever.

Can kick the Sukhois ass, and do STO/VL

>>8371190
Sorry, you are wrong.
Pic related.

>>8371243
why are the flags backwards?

>>8371359
But SR-71 cannot into weapons.

>>8371363
The flag is always turned backwards on the right side of the plane, to resemble the flag being behind the pole as the plane moves forwards. Think of a man with a flag on horseback.

>>8371363
Standard Aviation practice, depending on what side of the plane the aircraft is flying. The wind is always blowing down the aircraft side towards the back, hence flags on the right side of an aircraft are always painted as if the wind had moved them that way.

>>8371398
The question was 'most badass looking plane', and no plane really has a chance up against the sled.

B 1B Bomber here

Kaboom


btw theres a 1/48 scale model of it, how big would that be in 40k?

>>8371440
WE COST SO MUCH MONEY

BUT ITS SOOOOOOO WORTH IT

>>8371419

Missiles and stuff hanging off the wings are what look badass.

moar tanks

>>8371541
YADADADADADADAD-KABOOOM

In this book, east Asians (not China or Japan or Korea) go and invade this American air base trying to stave off WW3, and an A-10 pilot hops in a cannibalized plane with only one engine and missing metal plates and stuff and rides out on the runway to shoot tanks. He succeeds in destroying two -- the second one shot him back at the same time.

>>8371673
Sorry mate, but that sounds pretty stupid

>>8371778
got an un-shoop'd version?

I'm going to be picking up US Army, and my pair of Apaches shall have the toothiest shark grins in the history of nose art

>>8371778
It is. There's also a female president in office and a former General who starts his own spec-ops team in southeast Asia.

And apparently this is part of a series of books. *sigh*
There is a fairly hot part about this secretary getting laid, though

How is this mechanized russian list look?

40-Platoon Command
230-Mechanized Infantry Squad: BMP 3
230-Mechanized Infantry Squad: BMP 3
50-Artillery Strike
225-2S6 Tunguska
225-BMP-T TSFV

1000pts

>>8372047
Not a lot of soldiers if I'm honest.

>>8372096
well duh its mech

pretty mean actually. BMP 3 are basically tank transports

>>8372047
Looks good, but I could see it having trouble against a fast MEA list

>>8372047
Not a bad list. I presume your Platoon Command will be hoofin' it.
Good helicopter defense, but I wonder how MEA Bike Squads would do against it.

30" movement + Firing four to eight RPGs at any time during that movement?

>>8372047
like a lot of armored pain. be tough if you have to try to dig out enemy infantry though

PLA PLA PLA

TANKS
130-Infantry Squad
130-Infantry Squad
120-WZ 551 IFV
310-Type 99 MBT
310-Type 99 MBT


Oh and Spot the Caucasian

>>8372374
no AA defense, enjoy rape

>>8372255
I do so love the Bike Squad

>>8372445
fucking MEA are damn good in almost any type of list

SNIPERS

25x 15-Sniper
200-Biker Squad: 4 Extra Bikes
200-Biker Squad: 4 Extra Bikes
200-Biker Squad: 4 Extra Bikes
990pts

>>8372374
I've always wanted one of those padded tank helmets.

If anyone is keen I'll restart the write up for my adf lists

>>8372374
Maybe you can swap one of the Type 99s for a J-10? That's really the only effective AA that China has

>>8372460
......

fuck thats a hard list to deal with

you got 25 snipers running around picking off anyone they choose basically and 24 anti tank weapons is instant death to armor. only real way to take them out is aircraft but even then you got too many troops to take out

>>8372587
1,000 points of artillery strikes

>>8372587

If this isn't in the game, for a fair point cost, it's a bad game.

>>8372584

>J-10

In-game, though, I'm sure it's fine.

>>8370314

THE F-22 IS A PLANE MADE FOR A WAR WE'LL NEVER FI-

Oh. WAIT.

>>8372647
Can't let you do that.

You can take 3 Battalion Assets (or special assets for MEA) per 1,000 points. Per platoon, I should say.

That means 3 strikes at most. 50 pts for artillery, +50 points to turn it into Precision (which is worse because you have to get your 2" template on the target instead of a 6", but it can potentially destroy tanks.

I'm trying to make a good German Heer list but those mofos have weird Fire Team setups. Also, the transport rules don't help. See below.

The book mentions above that a squad is typically 10 men. This Jaegar squad is indeed 10 men.

The Marder and Puma can each only carry up to 6 infantry.

What's the deal? (Other lists are even worse, implying you can get 3 Humvees for the price of 1, and etc. This goes on through the whole Army List section.)

>>8372862
I would assume if you buy a Transport for a Jaeger squad some unlucky SOBs need to walk. This doesn't bother me too much as they aren't mechanized troops, for those buy panzergrenadiers. I do love the Jaeger squad setup though, it's nice to be able to easily detach just your machingun and AT assets

>>8372862
The three Humvees for the price of one is for people who can't read. It says at 45 points EACH, ie, each Humvee costs more.

>>8372961
No sir it does not say 'each'.

>>8373035
To be fair it is a misprint, but I would not play against anyone trying to justify multiple for 45 pts anymore that I would for someone trying to take a sergeant without fireteams for -20 points.

>>8373035
>he argues about the rules of a game
>on the internet

>>8373087
Right. Probably. This isn't GW we're talking about -- a simple review of their rulebook should tell the company "hey, this is ambiguous, let's clean it up."

This is a "misprint" that continues down the entire army list, for all factions' units with transport options. The book also has a few other misprints around, but they can be forgiven. This...this just confuses things up.

>>8373108
This is /tg/, fool. Did you miss the Exploding Runes thread earlier?

>>8373035
>One Hummer, for Every fire team, for +45 points.

I added punctuation so you understand.

>>8373197
So three hummers for +45.

I know common sense says it's +45 for each team. I just don't get why the company would fail to notice that error that takes up half of their book

>>8373243

No.

One Hummer, For +45 points. This is not a difficult concept. Most rulebooks have ambiguous wording in them...

>>8373126
I think the problem here is that this isn't a misprint in the sense of a word being missing, but rather in the sense that the developers didn't realize clarification would be necessary. To them and their playtesters it was probably an of course all transports are priced individually as that is what we have always done.
This is something that I have run into with other rules as well, and I try to keep an eye on this anytime I write up gaming material.

Does anyone have a scan of ambush alley?

>>8373141
Was there any mention of a wizard riding a dragon, and carpet bombing an entire country with exploding rune letters, while his bard friend played REO speedwagon by chance?

>>8373281
Same here.

"How will players abuse the wording of this rule, hmm, if I was a 40k cheese machine, how would I interpret this sentence"

>>8373303

well its not the hummers, its the Bradleys

I can get 2 for the price of 1. and bradleys are awesome

>>8373383
It reads the same way for Bradleys.

+120 pts per Bradley, since it specifies, per fire team...

What's the British bent inthis gme?

>>8373936
Elite dudes. In-between US "no-stealth" and German/Russian "guns that kill you immediately."

Also a number of transports that you'll probably never use.

>>8373936
Ridiculous armour on the tank, missiles that shoot around corners.

>>8373999
And the best man portable AA system in the game, lots of specialized vehicles, pretty good all around

pretty much, yeah

the us army has 4 different ground transports and 2 transport helicopters.

why?

>>8375080
because they hate russian players.

>>8375080
because US are their space marines

Is there any company that makes T-95, or do i have to convert one myself to field it?

Also, armylists lack older equipment. Russia should have at least BMP1 & 2s, T-62s ,T-72s, and T-80s. See Georgia war photos, russian army did not send their zomfgsuperawesome equipment, their sent 20-30 year old crap.

Dont even get me started with chine their standard tanks are fucking modifications of T-55s, Those new Type 99 are amybe 2% of their tank arsenal.

Still, Evo is a graet game. I might even sit down someday and write stats for all the lacking stuff.

Pic very related, its russian antique T-62 with new slotted armour, invading georgia. Fuck yeah T-62!

>>8378145
well its "Ultra Modern"

notice the MEA doesnt have any AK47 or lower RPG #

hell they mainly use AK 100's


dunno about the tank

>>8378212
Is there an AKM?

>>8378145
It's meant to be five minutes into the future (which makes me wonder why the British soldiers still use the SA80)

>>8378219
yes

its what the angry mob uses (15" range)

everyone else uses AK 103's or AK 104's

>>8378229
As i can see it, that diffrence is there to represent the fact that angry mob are unskilled durkas that are unable to hit broadside of the barn, while other forces actually know that this weird things on top of their ak are put there for a reason.

>>8378229
That's what I like to hear!

Now, 15" range is what in terms of this game? What are some other sample ranges of weapons?

>>8378292
AK 103's which is standard for the MEA troops are 20"

Germans have the G36 which is 24"

so most rifles are 20-24" range

>>8378289
>weird things on top of the ak

HA HA! Dangly parts...

AKM, commonly called the AK-47 by people that do not know the difference, is the most massively produced of the AK variants and is in fact the one on that flag and the one all the terrorists and african nutacses are using.

>>8378292
Generally they are longer than in most games. While there are some rudimentary close combat rules, BF evo is all about long range shootan.

IIRC m-16 and most assault rifles has 24' range, SAWs 30' , while sniper rifles or tank guns can shoot people from outside the fucking table (50-70 inch range). Generally speaking best way to play evo is built-up urban table, because generally speaking, in most cases - if you can see it, its in range.

>>8378337
::playing with tape measurer to see these inches::

Cool, cool... now what about the Browning .50 cal? Or that one Barret .50 cal like the M82 or M107? Are ranges adjustable by operator's skill?

>>8378345
Answered my question before I asked, and... answered with REALISM!

I love it!

>>8378345
yes urban/heavy terrain is in

thats why in the ME right now, idiot insurgents on the road planting IEDs can get crushed by a lone apache on patrol. (granted an apache is a deadly heli)

>>8378359
well they have a barret 109 at 60"

.50 cal MG is 36"

>>8378375

Beautiful! And the skill of the operator, any effect? Or is it assumed that if you gave it to them they have the proper training, no experts or deficiency?

>>8373281
I'm not a 40k fag, more of a travellerfag... but be prepared to see allot more of this.

it's the LOLMongoose quality standard.

Take a look at Mongoose's 'Beltstrike' for an even better example of such random screw ups.

>>8378344
Actually, some people know the diffrence, dear sir.

AK-47 is the orginal AK. AKM is modified verison, with some slight diffrences make mass production easier.

And generally speaking in hands of terrorists you have a fuckton of versions, because every nation of eastern bloc manufactured their own version.

You have hungarian ADMs, iraqui Tabuks, chinese Type-56, east german MPI-KM, polish KBK AK, romainain AI / AIM, bulgarian AKK etc, etc.

AK-47 may not be entirely correct, but its a good blanket designation for all kalshnokov based rifles that fire 7.62x29 round.

>>8378384
well its assumed everyone has proper training.

and really only dedicated sniper teams would carry the barret.

plus the only really "undertrained" army is MEA and they have SVU (which has 40" range)

>>8369025
WAT

>>8378392
Yup, Moongose has great rulesets, but they dont give a damn thing about proofreading their shit, and they put far too much trust in the players to interpret all their misprints and errors.

>>8378414
shame they think wargamers are the smartest, honest bunch in the world

>>8378410
Mexico STRONG.

Pic related, its a real mexican tank. Or closest thing they have to a tank.

>>8378440
mexicans, are orks?

We need apocalypse army list. Pic very related.

>>8378523
Also, putting bloodthirster against A-10 would be pure awesome.

>>8378451
Don't act so surprised.

How would you stat out IDF in this?

>>8378586
take the US army lolololololololol

>>8378292
Most Assault rifles have a 20" range, not 24". When you fire, you designate an enemy model (or structure) as the center of a "Fire Zone." This fire zone is typically 3" long but weapons with the Auto trait (any automatic weapon, including your average assault rifle) increase it to 6". Anything in that circle can potentially be hit.

When you roll to attack, your successful dice are placed against the unit(s, since you can split fire zones for a damage penalty) you shot at in a front-to-back order from the facing of your firing unit, kind of like Epic.

Here's the US Army Armoury. The Apache uses these CRV7 rockets that aren't on this list, but are on the British Army list...but they have precisely the same stats at the Hydra rocket. In fact, a number of weapons are very similar in this game.

>>8378586
I'm not sure but I bet somebody else did already.

>>8378671
Clarifying: Fire Zone is a circle 3" in radius, 6" for weapons with the Auto Trait. The book specifically mentions this allows weapons to effectively fire 3" longer than their listed range.

nobody mentioned this gem the US Army and USMC gets

urban warfare: won

>>8378788
I recently won a platoon of 6mm THQ japanee taks in a contest. I intend to convert them to TALON robots for my murikkans.

As much as a dick as I sound, is this a P&P game or tabletop?

>>8378882

Both.

>>8378788

No disadvantage for using drones? Like limited reactions or such?

>>8378897

Wait what......

So how does that work? You can play it both ways seperately or both together?

>>8378911
Dude's trollin'. This is a tabletop miniature wargame.
>>8378899
About reactions: I haven't seen anything about reactions being said here for drones, or in the reaction section of the book. The TALON entry says it can take no actions at all unless its operators use a Ready action first.

...I'm not 100% sure but if I were a judge I would rule that TALONs could only take a Reaction if they counted as Readied, i.e. their operators used a Ready action but didn't use it up by moving or shooting the TALON.

Otherwise, so you can be sure what they mean here, the Operator takes his two actions first. A Ready action will allow the TALON to take a Move or Shoot action after the Operator(s) are done.

The only way to get the US answer to an RPG is to mount it on a drone

>>8378422
Most wargamers are honest. I hate to stereotype, but the 13-18 year old demographic, the non-belt and suspenders group, tends to be the assholes. And they trend towards the popular games, and give good wargamers a bad name.

Here to save the motherfucking day.

>>8378414

Truth. Their RPG books are terrible, and I remember a section where they just copy-pasted cat-men to bear-men, and didn't bother updating the text at all.

That being said, this game is winning me over.

Looking at MP site now...

Post photos of games in progress! Not fan-wank military shit.

>>8379386

>>8379573
I want those models

Actually some of those are from ambush alley - but both use exaxctly the same scale, minatures and scenery.

Cool beans.

The great thing about this whole game is that if you look it from a top down view it feels like you're

A: A commander commanding through satellite view
B: A newscaster who's crazy enough to record firefight near danger.

UK stong!

Key thing in this game is tohave good scenery. Luckily durkastani mud buildings are relatively easy to made en masse, even for unexperienced gamer.

>>8379744
forgot mah pic

>>8379744
Yeah, flat deserts in this game don't really work. It doesn't need GOOD terrain so much as it simply needs TERRAIN. In 40k, you can use a few pieces of area terrain and some objective markers, but in this game, you need buildings and walls to hide behind.

I'm surprised this thread lasted through the night as I slept.

Battlefield Evo FTW

>>8379561
If that's a 15mm force, holy shit on the paint jobs.

>>8379880
If they really are 15mm then they were almost certainly pre-painted. Still...

>>8379890
Nope. Found them on th guild forums (need to register, sadly). Those are Trumpeter 1/72 Strykers (with MGS and mortar carrier version being a scratchbuilts). Everything is modelled and painted by the same guy. No prepaints.

Awesome shit, huh?

>>8379963
Requesting:
face of ._. represented by modern human

>>8379963
1/72 is that weird 24.5mm scale. it's amodel scale, but it's annoying.

Because I am cheap and refuse to buy anything until I have tested it, is there a .pdf floating about?

>>8379982
Some guy put up an OCR scan that was fantastic. I'll look for alink,

>>8379963
guy's name is Andy Rix.

>>8379982
Several have been posted on megaupload but I couldn't find them

>>8379977
Actually, 1/72 its 20mm scale. It works well with common 20mm and 15mm minis.

>>8380007
scratchbuildan MGS turret

Where can I get good, cheap 28mm (apparently the scale the book uses?) minis for this game?

/tg/ - /k/ with rules

>>8380039
another wip shot

>>8380053
shut it, hippie pacificst libtard.

>>8380066

bullet nazi

>>8379982
>>8380006

Yeah, that was me.
http://rapidshare.com/files/358432387/Battlefield_Evolution.pdf.html

there you go.

>>8380051
The book dos not have any dedicated ministures. But 28mm scale is bit too big. Use 20mm ( 1/72) scale for best effect.

Good choice are britannia and liberation miniatures, or 1/72 scale aermy men (caesar mianiatures make great modern US and various durkas, revell makes decent 90s era US, some brits, and fuckton of modern bundeswehr, Orion makes chechens and russkies). As for vehicles, everybody makes 1/72 stuff. Both model kits and prepaints are avaiable of almost everything.

>>8380099
You can't find pictures of Liberation stuff on their website...

>>8380094
Not the guy who asked, but hank you very much. Do you have other stuff? Like old edition BF EVO, BF WWII or apocalypse Z? Or any other similar games (like ambush alley?)

Anyway, evein if answer is negative, you still have my undying grattude for posting Evo, my good sir. Its fucking awesome.

>>8380115
http://www.ambushalleygames.com/forum/search.php -> Search for Liberation.

>>8380115
Yeah, you have too look through other sites to find them.

Try The Guild Forums and Ambush Alley forums for start.

They are very decent quality, through: Minis on
>>8379573
>>8379658
>>8380099
are from liberation and brittania IIRC.

>>8380125
Lots of misprints and such lie within. Use common sense, and please, read this thread before inquiring us.

>>8380099
How much, on average, would you say the 20mm, 1/72 scale stuff costs?

I really want to get into this game, but I doubt any of my friends would be willing to fork out the cash. So I figured if I had a varying supply of minis they'd be up for a few games.

>>8380099
Or 15mm. Which is awesome for vehicle/infantry selections, and significantly cheaper.

Dont let this thread die, people. Soembody should archive it.

>>8380125
I have World at War, and Zombies as well. DO you want them?

>>8380125
There are limited quick start rules for Ambush Alley.

http://www.ambushalleygames.com/quickstart.html

>>8380213
Yes, i would be very interested in them.

>>8380213

>>8380199
We've gotten a battlefield evo thread almost every day for the past week

>>8380277
It's fucking annoying too. I mean, I cam to /tg one day and there was no 40k threads spamming the same old memes on the front page! I WAS SO LOST AND CONFUSED!

>>8380277
Always opened and 100x bumped by the same guy.

>>8380259
>>8380238
Let me prepare them, and then I'll upload them.

>>8380300
Like most threads on /tg then...

>>8380277

I notice that nobody talks about actually playing Warhams or Warmachine these days though. It's odd.

>>8380313
Only on BoLS.

What does /tg/ think about Flames of War?

>>8380213
>>8380303
I have work tomorrow and i should go to sleep right now...

Eh, screw the work, for this i'm willing to wait until tomorrow mornig.

>>8380325
Good game. Althrough i dont like how it handles infantry, for me its kind of weird.

>>8380313
Wait until the Eastern Seaboard 3pm school's out rush of 13 year old tards.

>>8365820
Somebody rapid this.

Also, little question: What is in your opinion the best AA asset you can buy playng Bundeswehr?

>>8380463
The heck is Bundeswehr?

Autosaged... Someone make a new thread, stat!

>>8380325
FoW is one of my favorites. The rules are so much simpler and make much more sence than 40k.

Also it's far more tactical. You need to think more about where you are moving and what you are doing.

In 40k it's all just about getting into assault asap.

>>8380463
see:
>>8380303
>>8380213

Awesome anon is on the job, apparently.

>>8380477

German Army.

>>8380477
German Army

new thread here:
>>8380509

>>8370540
>aesthetics
>implying aesthetics are important for military craft
what is this i dont even