[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k] [cm / hm / y] [3 / adv / an / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / hc / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / po / pol / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / x] [rs] [status / ? / @] [Settings] [Home]
Board:  
Settings   Home
4chan
/qst/ - Quests


“A Knight is Sworn to Valour. His Heart Knows Only Virtue. His Blade Defends the Helpless. His Might Upholds the Weak. His Word Speaks Only Truth. His Wrath Undoes the Wicked.”

Every child in Cantôn knows of the Knight’s Code. From peasant-born waifs playing with sticks in the mud to keen-eyed noble sons practicing with cold steel in the training yard, all have at the very least dreamed of one day becoming a knight themselves. To ride out on errantry into the Five Duchies Kingdom and beyond for God and Glory, bringing the Law of Adam to the wicked and the Blade of Cain to the beast.

The Knights of Cantôn are sworn to follow the Code, to obey the King, to refuse no call for aid honestly asked for, to seek out and destroy the Foe wherever it may lurk and rid the world of evil.

Were it so easy…

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Twitter: https://twitter.com/BlackCompany666
/qst/ Archive: http://suptg.thisisnotatrueending.com/qstarchive.html?tags=Sworn%20to%20Valour
Our Knight & Companions Pastebin: https://pastebin.com/iBg32ZQw
General Plots & Intrigue: https://pastebin.com/HW6tG7TW
Secret War Specific Intrigue: https://pastebin.com/55pd59ku
Dramatis Personnae: https://pastebin.com/mydcz8pA
Faith & Politics Pastebin: https://pastebin.com/Cu4FPGVM
Foes, Foreigners & Monsters Pastebin: https://pastebin.com/nXwzHGGa
>>
Ass
>>
File: Slithering Wastelands.jpg (33 KB, 640x360)
33 KB
33 KB JPG
Many leagues to the East, in the Slithering Wastelands

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2yIELWjG8Tc – Freetown Theme

Tracker Jean watched the flapping sheet on the clothesline with furrowed brows. This was the third abandoned settlement they’d passed since leaving Freetown, not a human or reptile soul in sight. No evidence of violence or foul play either, but folks that were set on leaving on their own timetable didn’t tend to leave their laundry out…

Tracker Pa, ‘Old Man Snow’ hisself, had given Jean half-a-dozen extra caravan hands, Tracker greenfoots all. Young, inexperienced and useless as spare spit, Jean was told she was to break ‘em in to the merchant side of family business. But Jean suspected Pa just wanted them away from the usual territory out east of Freetown. That meant things were bad. Real bad.

Still, they’d done well so far even with the detour to avoid some of the heftiest toll fees Tracker Jean had seen in all her caravanserai days. Near two-dozen purebred Wasteland Mustangs, beautiful and proud specimens that would have been too much to handle for her hired hands if not for the extra Tracker boys tagging along. Even with a second slap of toll fees that was going to make back her expenses, cover all her creditor shares and leave her damn rich besides. If she could just get them back over the mountains…

”Boss.” Berric, her second, rode in with a little more hurry than she’d like to see. Something was up. ”People. Coming this way. Some saying they want to join up.”
”More refugees. From here?” Tracker Jean gestured at the deserted hamlet.

”Don’t think so. Freetown, I think. Or from that way.” Berric paused, hesitating. He sucked his teeth, a habit of his that arose whenever he was worrying too much. Or worrying just enough. “There’s a lot of ‘em, boss.”

[1/2]
>>
File: Tracker Jean.png (625 KB, 633x626)
625 KB
625 KB PNG
[2/2]

”Shit, that’s where half these folk were fleeing to. What the in Pit happened?” Jean swore, wondering when she started using the Cantôn turn of phrase. “Freetown still there?”

”They ain’t said nothing about Freetown falling or the like.” Her second grunted, pulling his mount astride hers. His dull brown eyes had settled on the gathering stormclouds in the distance. ”Ain’t what’s already happened that’s gottem runnin’ scared, I reckon.”

Tracker Jean nodded, looking back north and east to the distant horizon. Her second was right, Pit take it. It wasn’t what had come that had them all looking over their backs, it was what was coming.

==============================================

>“This is a merchant caravan, not a rescue mission.” If they can’t pay their own way, they can’t stay. Sucks to be them, but you have your creditors to think of. [Haughty]

>“Dust n’ Damnation… Alright, put the able-bodied on the payroll and get them to work. As for the rest… let’s get them something to eat.” Besides, there is safety in numbers. [Hearty]

>“More mouths to feed? A bigger target for the Scaled Horde? No thank you.” With any luck, your convoy will escape unscathed as the round up easier targets. [Cynic]
>>
>>4104177
>>“Dust n’ Damnation… Alright, put the able-bodied on the payroll and get them to work. As for the rest… let’s get them something to eat.” Besides, there is safety in numbers. [Hearty]
>>
>>4104177
>>“More mouths to feed? A bigger target for the Scaled Horde? No thank you.” With any luck, your convoy will escape unscathed as the round up easier targets. [Cynic]
>>
>>4104177
>>“Dust n’ Damnation… Alright, put the able-bodied on the payroll and get them to work. As for the rest… let’s get them something to eat.” Besides, there is safety in numbers. [Hearty]

I think with the frontiers, the frontier men and women will try to look for each other as much as possible. It's not all about the money for Jean after all.
>>
>>4104199
I dunno, I feel like there might be a case of "if you can't contribute you can't survive"
>>
>>4104177
>>“This is a merchant caravan, not a rescue mission.” If they can’t pay their own way, they can’t stay. Sucks to be them, but you have your creditors to think of. [Haughty]

Wastelands be a hard place getting harder.
>>
>>4104177
>>“More mouths to feed? A bigger target for the Scaled Horde? No thank you.” With any luck, your convoy will escape unscathed as the round up easier targets. [Cynic]
>>
>>4104177
>“Dust n’ Damnation… Alright, put the able-bodied on the payroll and get them to work. As for the rest… let’s get them something to eat.” Besides, there is safety in numbers. [Hearty]
>>
>>4104177
>“More mouths to feed? A bigger target for the Scaled Horde? No thank you.” With any luck, your convoy will escape unscathed as the round up easier targets. [Cynic]
>>
>>4104177
>They pay their own way or they can work it instead.[Haughty]+[Hearty]
We aren't running a charity but we aren't heartless either.
>>
>>4104177
>“Dust n’ Damnation… Alright, put the able-bodied on the payroll and get them to work. As for the rest… let’s get them something to eat.” Besides, there is safety in numbers. [Hearty]
>>
>>4104177
>“Dust n’ Damnation… Alright, put the able-bodied on the payroll and get them to work. As for the rest… let’s get them something to eat.” Besides, there is safety in numbers. [Hearty]

>They pay their own way or they can work it instead.[Haughty]+[Hearty]

As long as they contribute in some way I don't see an issue with it

What's up Forgotten? What happened to that meeting Tracker Jean was supposed to have with Duke Montbrun?
>>
>>4104177
>“Dust n’ Damnation… Alright, put the able-bodied on the payroll and get them to work. As for the rest… let’s get them something to eat.” Besides, there is safety in numbers. [Hearty]

>>4104315
I don't think she was actually meeting the Duke. Just going by his Castle to sell wares. Surely servants would do the shopping and not the Duke himself
>>
>>4104177
>“Dust n’ Damnation… Alright, put the able-bodied on the payroll and get them to work. As for the rest… let’s get them something to eat.” Besides, there is safety in numbers. [Hearty]

Ahh I love the sight of a new Sworn to Valour thread in the morning. Good day kniggas. I wonder what happened to that bard storyteller. I'm beginning to miss him.
>>
>>4104315
I doubt that the Duke of Montbrun himself met Tracker Jean and her caravan. He is probably occupied with far more important matters.
>>
>>4104177
>>“This is a merchant caravan, not a rescue mission.” If they can’t pay their own way, they can’t stay. Sucks to be them, but you have your creditors to think of. [Haughty]
>>
>>4104320
>>4104324
That makes sense. Thanks for clarifying it.

Is her name Jean or Jeanne by the way? Jean is a masculine male name.
>>
>>4104327
I think it's Jean but not sure
>>
>>4104177
>“Dust n’ Damnation… Alright, put the able-bodied on the payroll and get them to work. As for the rest… let’s get them something to eat.” Besides, there is safety in numbers. [Hearty]
>>
>>4104320
>>4104324
Still, I would like some details of how it went down.

>>4104327
It's Tracker Jean.
>>
>>4104177
>“Dust n’ Damnation… Alright, put the able-bodied on the payroll and get them to work. As for the rest… let’s get them something to eat.” Besides, there is safety in numbers. [Hearty]

I'm going with this after some thinking but adding a write-in to it.

>Inquire on what's going on. What is causing all of this? What happened in Freetown and what it's current state. Any information they have would be useful. [Hearty write-in addition]
>>
>>4104177
>>“Dust n’ Damnation… Alright, put the able-bodied on the payroll and get them to work. As for the rest… let’s get them something to eat.” Besides, there is safety in numbers. [Hearty]
>>
>>4104346
Supportan this.
>>
>>4104346
Prime serpent almost certainly
>>
>>4104177
>“Dust n’ Damnation… Alright, put the able-bodied on the payroll and get them to work. As for the rest… let’s get them something to eat.” Besides, there is safety in numbers. [Hearty]
>>
>>4104177
>>“Dust n’ Damnation… Alright, put the able-bodied on the payroll and get them to work. As for the rest… let’s get them something to eat.” Besides, there is safety in numbers. [Hearty]
>>
>>4104315
Supporting this

We’re not running a charity after all
>>
>>4104177

>They pay their own way or they can work it instead.[Haughty]+[Cynic]

Taking the wealthy or the useful. Refugees might also be more of a threat if they decide to rob us, taking on a couple as guards kight prevent that.

Maybe grab some strong dudes with kids to look after, they'll put in extra effort for their family while not being likely to rob and run.

Plus we'll look good doing it "because they have kids".
>>
>>4104177
>“Dust n’ Damnation… Alright, put the able-bodied on the payroll and get them to work. As for the rest… let’s get them something to eat.” Besides, there is safety in numbers. [Hearty

Well looks like something is hitting the fan.
>>
File: bdg regret.jpg (53 KB, 960x467)
53 KB
53 KB JPG
>>4104177
>“Dust n’ Damnation… Alright, put the able-bodied on the payroll and get them to work. As for the rest… let’s get them something to eat.” Besides, there is safety in numbers. [Hearty]

I don't anticipate that this will cause anything but trouble when we inevitably cross paths with the Prime Serpent's warbands that are causing trouble up here, but we might as well be no different than the Snakemen if we just leave these people on their own out here because we're too concerned with the bottom line.
>>
>>4104177
>They pay their own way or they can work it instead.[Haughty]+[Hearty]

No freeloaders.
>>
>>4104176
>“Dust n’ Damnation… Alright, put the able-bodied on the payroll and get them to work. As for the rest… let’s get them something to eat.” Besides, there is safety in numbers. [Hearty]
>>
> All these hearty replies

We ain't playing Emile, folks.
>>
>>4105181
Hearty for life
>>
>>4105181

Forgotten wouldn't be letting us pick the option if there was one "correct" answer to this. We get to influence Jean's character and choose which personality trait of hers we want to see come out. If this wasn't in character, then Forgotten wouldn't let us choose it as an option.
>>
>>4105181
>Hearty
>Emile
Like anons aren't on the idealist autopick
>>
>>4104177
>>“More mouths to feed? A bigger target for the Scaled Horde? No thank you.” With any luck, your convoy will escape unscathed as the round up easier targets. [Cynic]
>>
>>4104177
>“More mouths to feed? A bigger target for the Scaled Horde? No thank you.” With any luck, your convoy will escape unscathed as the round up easier targets. [Cynic]

Well, she is a trader not a Knight.
>>
>>4105181
>expecting Kniggas to pick anything other than Hearty+Idealism

LMAO Kniggas are going to try and drop Haughty as soon as possible
>>
>>4104177
>“Dust n’ Damnation… Alright, put the able-bodied on the payroll and get them to work. As for the rest… let’s get them something to eat.” Besides, there is safety in numbers. [Hearty]
>>
File: Wasteland Mustang.jpg (86 KB, 675x900)
86 KB
86 KB JPG
>“Dust n’ Damnation… Alright, put the able-bodied on the payroll and get them to work. As for the rest… let’s get them something to eat.” Besides, there is safety in numbers. [Hearty]

Tracker Jean lets compassion rule over her calculated mercantile wisdom. The results of this vote, and the risk it subjects the caravan to, remain to be seen…

===================================================

Previous Sir Emile Andrei Vote
Confessor
>You choose Father Towbray, as is appropriate under Romani doctrine. His is the hard and narrow path. He will not spare the rod, nor spoil the sinful child. He will remind you of who you are. Of -what- you are. A Knight. A Warrior of God. [Haughty] + [Idealist]

Confessions
>”I have spoken falsehoods and deceived my fellow man.” Your lie to the faction thugs beneath the ruins may have avoided bloodshed and saved lives, but it was still a lie. [Hearty]
>”I have harboured doubts. In my Faith, in the wisdom of the church. Even… even in the truth of the Holy Message.” You have tried not to dwell on what you witnessed in the darkness. Tried. [Idealist]
Sir Emile Andrei confesses to the sin of doubt and speaking falsehoods.

Did Not Confess
>”I have consorted with beastfolk, Fae and men of low character.” An alliance born of compromise. They may not be evil incarnate, but they are of the Foe. You had begun to forget that. [Haughty]
While Sir Emile Andrei certainly does not trust their ilk, he does not consider his affiliation with the beastfolk, Fae and Bluejays to be a sin in and of itself.
> Unrepentant. Gain +1 Step on the Path of Thorns [3].
> ‘To the Victor, the Spoils’ UNLOCKED: Always gain +1 Wealth at the successful conclusion of any engagement at a Skirmish level or larger, assuming there is time for your hirelings to pick over the remains.

[1/4]
>>
>>4105560
> ‘To the Victor, the Spoils’ UNLOCKED: Always gain +1 Wealth at the successful conclusion of any engagement at a Skirmish level or larger, assuming there is time for your hirelings to pick over the remains

H E L L O.

How big is skirmish level again?
>>
>>4105561
Anything that requires a battle roll result, essentially.
>>
>>4105560
> Unrepentant. Gain +1 Step on the Path of Thorns [3].
> ‘To the Victor, the Spoils’ UNLOCKED: Always gain +1 Wealth at the successful conclusion of any engagement at a Skirmish level or larger, assuming there is time for your hirelings to pick over the remains.

Hahaha nice
>>
File: Cloistered Chapel.gif (4.19 MB, 960x403)
4.19 MB
4.19 MB GIF
Sandag, 9th Day of Novrimun, 883 A.C.E. Motte-Fallavon Chapel

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3dcbjanbXRU – Penitent Knight theme

The penitent lay prostrate before the Chapel altar depicting Salve Reginae and the Apprehension, the scene of Cain struggling free from the Cross as the guards took his Mother away. She had known that coming to offer succour and tend his wounds would lead to her recapture and harsher punishment, but she could not bear to watch her tormented son suffer in silence. Like the Brother Cain, the penitent was stripped naked to the waist and face downcast. His bare arms, knees and forehead were sore from being pressed against the cold tile floor.

As was his right as a man of noble blood, the penitent had requested the chapel hall be cleared for his confession. Indeed the chapel existed for exactly such a purpose, most sermons and services were held in the main church further downhill. What sins had been divulged in these halls by both meek and mighty, what petty failings and wicked atrocities had been attested to on these very stone tiles?

Father Towbray stood at the side of the altar, dressed in the simple red wool cloak of his sect. He looked up at the depiction of Salve Reginae and the Apprehension, dwelling on the penitent’s confession. He tried to find it in his heart to show the exemplary forgiveness demonstrated by the Mother of the Faith. He tried to remind himself to be no more harsh than necessary, as a loving mother would discipline a wayward child. He must not let his anger at the multitude of human failings, many and endless, cloud the lessons to be learned here. Mercy was not a weakness, of course it was not. But mercy and laxity in vigilance were two different things.

“We are all of us, creatures of doubt. We are all of us, creatures of sin. The church is not the Almighty anymore than a sapling is the forest, the church is merely an institution of fallible men that strives to interpret His Will. To hold those fallible men accountable to their failings, to decry those of the cloth that would warp the Word for their own ends… This is strength of character, not sin. Likewise, to doubt the forte of one’s own faith is a strength, not weakness.” The priest’s voice takes a harsh turn, his fists clench as he turns his back on the penitent. ”But to let that doubt be dwelt upon, to risk twisting your piety into cynicism and unbelief. To question not just the messenger, but the Message… That is a disease of the soul that takes root like a weed. And like a weed it must be torn out, root and stem!”

The Montbrun priest breathed in and out deeply. They would get to that later.

[2/4]
>>
>>4105560
>> Unrepentant. Gain +1 Step on the Path of Thorns [3].
>> ‘To the Victor, the Spoils’ UNLOCKED: Always gain +1 Wealth at the successful conclusion of any engagement at a Skirmish level or larger, assuming there is time for your hirelings to pick over the remains.

hello hello

This is WELL welcome.
>>
File: Father Towbray 2.jpg (7 KB, 194x259)
7 KB
7 KB JPG
“These falsehoods, these lies. Why did you speak them?”

“Your Reverence, it… avoided bloodshed.” The peninent’s left arm muscle trembles on its own volition, a sign of the strain this awkward posture was putting on them.

“It was convenient then.” The word ‘convenient’ seems to leave a foul taste in the holy man’s mouth. ”Do the oaths of your office say ‘Speak Truth Only When Convenient’? Does it say ‘Speak Only Truth, Unless Necessity Demands Otherwise?’ ”
The penitent does not move, their shamed silence is answer enough.

Father Towbray continues. ”Was the avoidance of bloodshed worth the compromise of your Code? Was it worth knowing that you had tainted yourself with a liar’s tongue?”

”…It was not, Your Reverence.”

”Are you not a Knight of Cantôn?! The priest’s sudden roar booms throughout the chapel hall. He whirls on the penitent, spittle flying with righteous rage. ”Are you not a Warrior of God, a Castellan whose conduct guards his own soul as surely as his blade guards the realm?!”

”I am!”

”Liar! Faithless wretch! Where the strength of weaker men falters You stand strong! Where the courage of lesser men fails, You hold fast!! Where those less worthy choose the easy path, the path of convenience…” The priest spits the word. ”The path of a fallen world, You stand proof against corruption! I ask you again worm, cretin, fallen thing! I ask you again, are you not a Knight of Cantôn?!

The penitent shakes as the priest grabs a tuft of his hair, demanding an answer. “I am! I swear to the Almighty, Salve Reginae and the Brothers that I am!”

[3/4]
>>
File: Annointed with Holy Oil.jpg (557 KB, 1157x1536)
557 KB
557 KB JPG
[4/4]

“Do you denounce these sins and failings, and shed your past fallen life to carry the word of the Almighty forward once more?” The priest holds the holy oil like a man holds a club with a snake underheel, ready crush the taint of the soul without remorse or hesitation.
Were any other man to touch him so, to lay his hands upon his bare head so roughly and uninvited, the penitent knight would have cut him down without hesitation. Instead he cries out, as if in pain. ”I do! By the Kingdom of the One True God and all his Angels in Heaven, I do!”

”Rise and rejoice, brother. Washed clean, born anew. The path to redemption is long and arduous, but the road is always open. If one has the courage to follow it.” Father Towbray finishes anointing the young penitent knight with oil, embracing him a fellow Brother of the Faith as they rise. The knight must undergo penance to wash away their past sins, to show the world that he has shorn himself of the failings of his former sinful self.

------------------------------------------------------------

(1) Penance for the Sin of Falsehood. Select One.
>”Chapter II, verse XII. Utter no word but the truth. And, if the truth should elude thee, utter no word.” Sir Andrei is may utter no word until he kisses the feet of the Holy Figurehead in Port Bounty. [Sworn to Silence]

>”Chapter II, verse IX. In His eyes, status and wealth are equally worthless. Purity of the soul is the Almighty’s currency.” Sir Andrei may enjoy no luxury until he arrives at Port Bounty, he gains no bonus from Wealth status or attire. [Penury]


-
(2) Penance for the Sin of Doubt. Select One.
>”Chapter I, verse LX. The lash wielded by thine own hand leaves a deeper mark than any master’s whip.” Sir Andrei is reduced to Battered health status until he arrives at Port Bounty. [Flagellation]

>”Chapter I, verse XXVI. Faith is the staple of the brave, not the wise. A man without doubt does not hesitate to grasp the lightning.” At the next Vigil in Pascae, Sir Andrei must actively seek to be struck by lightning during the storm. This could very well kill him. [Leap of Faith]


-
(3) The Visions. Select One.
>The Angel has not sworn you to silence, but nor has it bid you to speak of its appearances to any other soul. You will hold your tongue for now, and await Heaven’s command. [Haughty] + [Idealist]

>Father Towbray is your Confessor, your spiritual guide and confidant. If there is anyone that can be entrusted to share these revelations with and what they mean, it is he. [Hearty] + [Idealist]
>>
>>4105576

1)
>”Chapter II, verse IX. In His eyes, status and wealth are equally worthless. Purity of the soul is the Almighty’s currency.” Sir Andrei may enjoy no luxury until he arrives at Port Bounty, he gains no bonus from Wealth status or attire. [Penury]

2)
>”Chapter I, verse XXVI. Faith is the staple of the brave, not the wise. A man without doubt does not hesitate to grasp the lightning.” At the next Vigil in Pascae, Sir Andrei must actively seek to be struck by lightning during the storm. This could very well kill him. [Leap of Faith]

3)
>The Angel has not sworn you to silence, but nor has it bid you to speak of its appearances to any other soul. You will hold your tongue for now, and await Heaven’s command. [Haughty] + [Idealist]

That leap of faith is fucking badass
>>
>>4105576
>”Chapter II, verse IX. In His eyes, status and wealth are equally worthless. Purity of the soul is the Almighty’s currency.” Sir Andrei may enjoy no luxury until he arrives at Port Bounty, he gains no bonus from Wealth status or attire. [Penury]
>”Chapter I, verse LX. The lash wielded by thine own hand leaves a deeper mark than any master’s whip.” Sir Andrei is reduced to Battered health status until he arrives at Port Bounty. [Flagellation]
>The Angel has not sworn you to silence, but nor has it bid you to speak of its appearances to any other soul. You will hold your tongue for now, and await Heaven’s command. [Haughty] + [Idealist]
>>
>>4105576
>”Chapter II, verse XII. Utter no word but the truth. And, if the truth should elude thee, utter no word.” Sir Andrei is may utter no word until he kisses the feet of the Holy Figurehead in Port Bounty. [Sworn to Silence]
>”Chapter I, verse LX. The lash wielded by thine own hand leaves a deeper mark than any master’s whip.” Sir Andrei is reduced to Battered health status until he arrives at Port Bounty. [Flagellation]
>The Angel has not sworn you to silence, but nor has it bid you to speak of its appearances to any other soul. You will hold your tongue for now, and await Heaven’s command. [Haughty] + [Idealist]
>>
>>4105576
>(1) Penance for the Sin of Falsehood. Select One.
>>”Chapter II, verse IX. In His eyes, status and wealth are equally worthless. Purity of the soul is the Almighty’s currency.” Sir Andrei may enjoy no luxury until he arrives at Port Bounty, he gains no bonus from Wealth status or attire. [Penury]
>-
>(2) Penance for the Sin of Doubt. Select One.
>>”Chapter I, verse LX. The lash wielded by thine own hand leaves a deeper mark than any master’s whip.” Sir Andrei is reduced to Battered health status until he arrives at Port Bounty. [Flagellation]

>-
>(3) The Visions. Select One.
>>Father Towbray is your Confessor, your spiritual guide and confidant. If there is anyone that can be entrusted to share these revelations with and what they mean, it is he. [Hearty] + [Idealist]

-----

>At the next Vigil in Pascae, Sir Andrei must actively seek to be struck by lightning during the storm. This could very well kill him. [Leap of Faith]

Out of curiosity, how would this be rolled? We roll to try to get hit then roll to survive? I don't think armour saves would apply to this, no?
>>
>>4105576
>”Chapter II, verse XII. Utter no word but the truth. And, if the truth should elude thee, utter no word.” Sir Andrei is may utter no word until he kisses the feet of the Holy Figurehead in Port Bounty. [Sworn to Silence]

>”Chapter I, verse XXVI. Faith is the staple of the brave, not the wise. A man without doubt does not hesitate to grasp the lightning.” At the next Vigil in Pascae, Sir Andrei must actively seek to be struck by lightning during the storm. This could very well kill him. [Leap of Faith]

>Father Towbray is your Confessor, your spiritual guide and confidant. If there is anyone that can be entrusted to share these revelations with and what they mean, it is he. [Hearty] + [Idealist]

So Father Towbray know that the Church sometimes serves it's faithless own ends and must be held accountable. Makes me think highly of them
>>
>>4105576
(1)
>”Chapter II, verse IX. In His eyes, status and wealth are equally worthless. Purity of the soul is the Almighty’s currency.” Sir Andrei may enjoy no luxury until he arrives at Port Bounty, he gains no bonus from Wealth status or attire. [Penury]
(2)
>”Chapter I, verse LX. The lash wielded by thine own hand leaves a deeper mark than any master’s whip.” Sir Andrei is reduced to Battered health status until he arrives at Port Bounty. [Flagellation]
(3)
>Father Towbray is your Confessor, your spiritual guide and confidant. If there is anyone that can be entrusted to share these revelations with and what they mean, it is he. [Hearty] + [Idealist]
>>
>>4105576
1
>”Chapter II, verse IX. In His eyes, status and wealth are equally worthless. Purity of the soul is the Almighty’s currency.” Sir Andrei may enjoy no luxury until he arrives at Port Bounty, he gains no bonus from Wealth status or attire. [Penury]

2
>”Chapter I, verse XXVI. Faith is the staple of the brave, not the wise. A man without doubt does not hesitate to grasp the lightning.” At the next Vigil in Pascae, Sir Andrei must actively seek to be struck by lightning during the storm. This could very well kill him. [Leap of Faith]

3
>The Angel has not sworn you to silence, but nor has it bid you to speak of its appearances to any other soul. You will hold your tongue for now, and await Heaven’s command. [Haughty] + [Idealist]
>>
>>4105582
Cainites are more fundamentalist with church doctrine, they are more willing to purge the corruption out of the clergy, whereas adamites are more likely to forgive it.
>>
>>4105576
>”Chapter II, verse XII. Utter no word but the truth. And, if the truth should elude thee, utter no word.” Sir Andrei is may utter no word until he kisses the feet of the Holy Figurehead in Port Bounty. [Sworn to Silence]

>”Chapter I, verse LX. The lash wielded by thine own hand leaves a deeper mark than any master’s whip.” Sir Andrei is reduced to Battered health status until he arrives at Port Bounty. [Flagellation]

>The Angel has not sworn you to silence, but nor has it bid you to speak of its appearances to any other soul. You will hold your tongue for now, and await Heaven’s command. [Haughty] + [Idealist]
>>
>>4105582
>them
him*
Sorry meant him Father Towbray.
>>
>>4105576
>”Chapter II, verse XII. Utter no word but the truth. And, if the truth should elude thee, utter no word.” Sir Andrei is may utter no word until he kisses the feet of the Holy Figurehead in Port Bounty. [Sworn to Silence]

Thematic punishments are pleasing.


>”Chapter I, verse XXVI. Faith is the staple of the brave, not the wise. A man without doubt does not hesitate to grasp the lightning.” At the next Vigil in Pascae, Sir Andrei must actively seek to be struck by lightning during the storm. This could very well kill him. [Leap of Faith]

I don't have a good reason for picking this.

>The Angel has not sworn you to silence, but nor has it bid you to speak of its appearances to any other soul. You will hold your tongue for now, and await Heaven’s command. [Haughty] + [Idealist]
>>
people feeling particularly suicidal today, willingly leaping into lightning bolts and all; I'm going to have the copper clipper stat sheet on standby.
>>
On second thought...
>>
>>4105586
Changing my penance of sin vote here to
>”Chapter I, verse XXVI. Faith is the staple of the brave, not the wise. A man without doubt does not hesitate to grasp the lightning.” At the next Vigil in Pascae, Sir Andrei must actively seek to be struck by lightning during the storm. This could very well kill him. [Leap of Faith]
>>
>>4105576
1
>Penury

2
>Flagellation

2
>Hearty + Idealist
>>4105585
>whereas adamites are more likely to forgive it.

Clearly not the case as that would violate the Law of Adam. They might go for a lighter less harsher punishement and for merciful repentance, but they won't let the crime or criminal go till they are trialed and convicted. The Adam order Emile chose is all about investigating wrongdoings and bringing the criminals to justice of Adam's law.
>>
>>4105576
>”Chapter II, verse IX. In His eyes, status and wealth are equally worthless. Purity of the soul is the Almighty’s currency.” Sir Andrei may enjoy no luxury until he arrives at Port Bounty, he gains no bonus from Wealth status or attire. [Penury]

>”Chapter I, verse LX. The lash wielded by thine own hand leaves a deeper mark than any master’s whip.” Sir Andrei is reduced to Battered health status until he arrives at Port Bounty. [Flagellation]

>Father Towbray is your Confessor, your spiritual guide and confidant. If there is anyone that can be entrusted to share these revelations with and what they mean, it is he. [Hearty] + [Idealist]
>>
>>4105606
>>4105609
Changing
>>
>>4105576
(1) >”Chapter II, verse XII. Utter no word but the truth. And, if the truth should elude thee, utter no word.” Sir Andrei is may utter no word until he kisses the feet of the Holy Figurehead in Port Bounty. [Sworn to Silence]
This seems like the more challenging choice, but it fits the bill much better as redemption for this sin.

(2) >”Chapter I, verse XXVI. Faith is the staple of the brave, not the wise. A man without doubt does not hesitate to grasp the lightning.” At the next Vigil in Pascae, Sir Andrei must actively seek to be struck by lightning during the storm. This could very well kill him. [Leap of Faith]
I.... I honestly cannot stress enough how fucking badass this is going to be. I don't give a fuck if it kills Emile and ends the quest, the write-up for it is going to be so insanely good that it'll be worth it.

(3) >Father Towbray is your Confessor, your spiritual guide and confidant. If there is anyone that can be entrusted to share these revelations with and what they mean, it is he. [Hearty] + [Idealist]

If we're going to tell someone about them, this seems like as good a time as any. The only other options would be to wait until we meet someone further up the religious chain of hierarchy, or to just never tell anyone, and neither of those seem as good as this.
>>
>>4105576
>>”Chapter II, verse IX. In His eyes, status and wealth are equally worthless. Purity of the soul is the Almighty’s currency.” Sir Andrei may enjoy no luxury until he arrives at Port Bounty, he gains no bonus from Wealth status or attire. [Penury]

>”Chapter I, verse LX. The lash wielded by thine own hand leaves a deeper mark than any master’s whip.” Sir Andrei is reduced to Battered health status until he arrives at Port Bounty. [Flagellation]

>The Angel has not sworn you to silence, but nor has it bid you to speak of its appearances to any other soul. You will hold your tongue for now, and await Heaven’s command. [Haughty] + [Idealist]
>>
>>4105576
(1) Penance for the Sin of Falsehood.
>”Chapter II, verse IX. In His eyes, status and wealth are equally worthless. Purity of the soul is the Almighty’s currency.” Sir Andrei may enjoy no luxury until he arrives at Port Bounty, he gains no bonus from Wealth status or attire. [Penury]

(2) Penance for the Sin of Doubt.
>”Chapter I, verse XXVI. Faith is the staple of the brave, not the wise. A man without doubt does not hesitate to grasp the lightning.” At the next Vigil in Pascae, Sir Andrei must actively seek to be struck by lightning during the storm. This could very well kill him. [Leap of Faith]

(3) The Visions
>The Angel has not sworn you to silence, but nor has it bid you to speak of its appearances to any other soul. You will hold your tongue for now, and await Heaven’s command. [Haughty] + [Idealist]
>>
>>4105576
>”Chapter II, verse XII. Utter no word but the truth. And, if the truth should elude thee, utter no word.” Sir Andrei is may utter no word until he kisses the feet of the Holy Figurehead in Port Bounty. [Sworn to Silence]

>”Chapter I, verse LX. The lash wielded by thine own hand leaves a deeper mark than any master’s whip.” Sir Andrei is reduced to Battered health status until he arrives at Port Bounty. [Flagellation]

>Father Towbray is your Confessor, your spiritual guide and confidant. If there is anyone that can be entrusted to share these revelations with and what they mean, it is he. [Hearty] + [Idealist]
>>
>>4105576
(1) Penance for the Sin of Falsehood. Select One.
>”Chapter II, verse IX. In His eyes, status and wealth are equally worthless. Purity of the soul is the Almighty’s currency.” Sir Andrei may enjoy no luxury until he arrives at Port Bounty, he gains no bonus from Wealth status or attire. [Penury]

(2) Penance for the Sin of Doubt. Select One
I'm totally with the let's go motherfucker option but still I don't want to a character to die on pascae just to other be born there
>”Chapter I, verse LX. The lash wielded by thine own hand leaves a deeper mark than any master’s whip.” Sir Andrei is reduced to Battered health status until he arrives at Port Bounty. [Flagellation]

(3) The Visions. Select One.
>The Angel has not sworn you to silence, but nor has it bid you to speak of its appearances to any other soul. You will hold your tongue for now, and await Heaven’s command. [Haughty] + [Idealist]
you telling jack shit brother I'm pretty sure they kill people for this
>>
>>4105581
A single roll. Doubles you get struck by lightning. A natural 100 will see you dead.

An interesting way to end the quest arc, that's for sure.
>>
Rolled 34 (1d100)

>>4105694
Just gonna get this bad roll out of the way
>>
>>4105576
>”Chapter II, verse IX. In His eyes, status and wealth are equally worthless. Purity of the soul is the Almighty’s currency.” Sir Andrei may enjoy no luxury until he arrives at Port Bounty, he gains no bonus from Wealth status or attire. [Penury]

>”Chapter I, verse XXVI. Faith is the staple of the brave, not the wise. A man without doubt does not hesitate to grasp the lightning.” At the next Vigil in Pascae, Sir Andrei must actively seek to be struck by lightning during the storm. This could very well kill him. [Leap of Faith]

>The Angel has not sworn you to silence, but nor has it bid you to speak of its appearances to any other soul. You will hold your tongue for now, and await Heaven’s command. [Haughty] + [Idealist]

Cain in a cross, penance is harsh and Father Towbray doesn't fuck around with it. Better not break a vow again.
>>
>>4105576
>>”Chapter II, verse XII. Utter no word but the truth. And, if the truth should elude thee, utter no word.” Sir Andrei is may utter no word until he kisses the feet of the Holy Figurehead in Port Bounty. [Sworn to Silence]

>”Chapter I, verse XXVI. Faith is the staple of the brave, not the wise. A man without doubt does not hesitate to grasp the lightning.” At the next Vigil in Pascae, Sir Andrei must actively seek to be struck by lightning during the storm. This could very well kill him. [Leap of Faith]

>Father Towbray is your Confessor, your spiritual guide and confidant. If there is anyone that can be entrusted to share these revelations with and what they mean, it is he. [Hearty] + [Idealist]
>>
>>4105576
>”Chapter II, verse IX. In His eyes, status and wealth are equally worthless. Purity of the soul is the Almighty’s currency.” Sir Andrei may enjoy no luxury until he arrives at Port Bounty, he gains no bonus from Wealth status or attire. [Penury]

>”Chapter I, verse XXVI. Faith is the staple of the brave, not the wise. A man without doubt does not hesitate to grasp the lightning.” At the next Vigil in Pascae, Sir Andrei must actively seek to be struck by lightning during the storm. This could very well kill him. [Leap of Faith]

>The Angel has not sworn you to silence, but nor has it bid you to speak of its appearances to any other soul. You will hold your tongue for now, and await Heaven’s command. [Haughty] + [Idealist]
>>
>>4105576
>Chapter II, verse XII. Utter no word but the truth. And, if the truth should elude thee, utter no word.” Sir Andrei is may utter no word until he kisses the feet of the Holy Figurehead in Port Bounty. [Sworn to Silence]

>Chapter I, verse LX. The lash wielded by thine own hand leaves a deeper mark than any master’s whip.” Sir Andrei is reduced to Battered health status until he arrives at Port Bounty. [Flagellation]

>The Angel has not sworn you to silence, but nor has it bid you to speak of its appearances to any other soul. You will hold your tongue for now, and await Heaven’s command. [Haughty] + [Idealist]

We are but a tool of the Almighty - who are we to divulge His plans without direction.
>>
>>4105791

This is me by the way
>>4104621
>>
>>4105576
>”Chapter II, verse IX. In His eyes, status and wealth are equally worthless. Purity of the soul is the Almighty’s currency.” Sir Andrei may enjoy no luxury until he arrives at Port Bounty, he gains no bonus from Wealth status or attire. [Penury]

>”Chapter I, verse XXVI. Faith is the staple of the brave, not the wise. A man without doubt does not hesitate to grasp the lightning.” At the next Vigil in Pascae, Sir Andrei must actively seek to be struck by lightning during the storm. This could very well kill him. [Leap of Faith]

>The Angel has not sworn you to silence, but nor has it bid you to speak of its appearances to any other soul. You will hold your tongue for now, and await Heaven’s command. [Haughty] + [Idealist]
>>
>>4105576
>>”Chapter II, verse IX. In His eyes, status and wealth are equally worthless. Purity of the soul is the Almighty’s currency.” Sir Andrei may enjoy no luxury until he arrives at Port Bounty, he gains no bonus from Wealth status or attire. [Penury]
>”Chapter I, verse XXVI. Faith is the staple of the brave, not the wise. A man without doubt does not hesitate to grasp the lightning.” At the next Vigil in Pascae, Sir Andrei must actively seek to be struck by lightning during the storm. This could very well kill him. [Leap of Faith]
>Father Towbray is your Confessor, your spiritual guide and confidant. If there is anyone that can be entrusted to share these revelations with and what they mean, it is he. [Hearty] + [Idealist]
>>
>>4105576
>>”Chapter II, verse IX. In His eyes, status and wealth are equally worthless. Purity of the soul is the Almighty’s currency.” Sir Andrei may enjoy no luxury until he arrives at Port Bounty, he gains no bonus from Wealth status or attire. [Penury]
>>”Chapter I, verse LX. The lash wielded by thine own hand leaves a deeper mark than any master’s whip.” Sir Andrei is reduced to Battered health status until he arrives at Port Bounty. [Flagellation]
>The Angel has not sworn you to silence, but nor has it bid you to speak of its appearances to any other soul. You will hold your tongue for now, and await Heaven’s command. [Haughty] + [Idealist]
>>
>>4105576
>”Chapter II, verse IX. In His eyes, status and wealth are equally worthless. Purity of the soul is the Almighty’s currency.” Sir Andrei may enjoy no luxury until he arrives at Port Bounty, he gains no bonus from Wealth status or attire. [Penury


>”Chapter I, verse LX. The lash wielded by thine own hand leaves a deeper mark than any master’s whip.” Sir Andrei is reduced to Battered health status until he arrives at Port Bounty. [Flagellation

>The Angel has not sworn you to silence, but nor has it bid you to speak of its appearances to any other soul. You will hold your tongue for now, and await Heaven’s command. [Haughty] + [Idealist

Wow now this is going to be a bumby ride.
>>
>>4105576
>”Chapter II, verse IX. In His eyes, status and wealth are equally worthless. Purity of the soul is the Almighty’s currency.” Sir Andrei may enjoy no luxury until he arrives at Port Bounty, he gains no bonus from Wealth status or attire. [Penury


>”Chapter I, verse LX. The lash wielded by thine own hand leaves a deeper mark than any master’s whip.” Sir Andrei is reduced to Battered health status until he arrives at Port Bounty. [Flagellation

>The Angel has not sworn you to silence, but nor has it bid you to speak of its appearances to any other soul. You will hold your tongue for now, and await Heaven’s command. [Haughty] + [Idealist]
>>
>>4105909
>>4105926
Samefag please stop.
>>
>>4105909
>>4105926
>posts formatted in the exact same way
>flagellation missing a ] in both posts
>>
>>4105576
>>”Chapter II, verse IX. In His eyes, status and wealth are equally worthless. Purity of the soul is the Almighty’s currency.” Sir Andrei may enjoy no luxury until he arrives at Port Bounty, he gains no bonus from Wealth status or attire. [Penury]>”Chapter I, verse XXVI. Faith is the staple of the brave, not the wise. A man without doubt does not hesitate to grasp the lightning.” At the next Vigil in Pascae, Sir Andrei must actively seek to be struck by lightning during the storm. This could very well kill him. [Leap of Faith]>The Angel has not sworn you to silence, but nor has it bid you to speak of its appearances to any other soul. You will hold your tongue for now, and await Heaven’s command. [Haughty] + [Idealist]

>>4105930
>>4105955
Could have just copy/paste, though.
>>
>>4105955
>>4105930
Couse you know that copy and paste is a thing right?

I post from my phone so my id chnages alot
>>4105909
This was my post

>>4104784
This is also me

If i was going to same fag i wouldnt do it in such a obviously way.
>>
>>4105576
>”Chapter II, verse IX. In His eyes, status and wealth are equally worthless. Purity of the soul is the Almighty’s currency.” Sir Andrei may enjoy no luxury until he arrives at Port Bounty, he gains no bonus from Wealth status or attire. [Penury]

>(2) Penance for the Sin of Doubt. Select One.
>”Chapter I, verse LX. The lash wielded by thine own hand leaves a deeper mark than any master’s whip.” Sir Andrei is reduced to Battered health status until he arrives at Port Bounty. [Flagellation]

>(3) The Visions. Select One.
>Father Towbray is your Confessor, your spiritual guide and confidant. If there is anyone that can be entrusted to share these revelations with and what they mean, it is he. [Hearty] + [Idealist]
>>
>>4105955
>>4105930
I copy pastad his shit because I agreed with it, calm down niggers
>>
>>4106012
> Bumby

> Chnages

> If I was going to samefage I wouldnt do it in such a obvious way

> I copy pastad his shit

> When illiterate-anons bad spelling catches him out on samefagging.
>>
>>4106098
Uummm it dosnt prove anything at all, its just a differnt person using the same options as me. Guse evey person that picks the same options are now samefaging??
>>
>>4106158
Honest to god, I don't know if you're intentionally spelling this badly or not.

Also, I mean, I hope you aren't because I really don't think it's a good idea to talk about the visions.
>>
>>4106169
i think it's too committed and subtle to be trolling, he only gets a little attention for it and seems to participate pretty actively
>>
>>4106169
I didnt vote to talk about the visions though

>The Angel has not sworn you to silence, but nor has it bid you to speak of its appearances to any other soul. You will hold your tongue for now, and await Heaven’s command. [Haughty] + [Idealist
This is what i voted for.
Are the visions telling you stuff?
Im still amazed that my bad spelling gets any attention at all which is funny in of its self
>>
>>4106176
That was why I was hoping you weren't samefagging.

Because I also voted to not talk about the visions.
>>
>>4106172
Honestly, the first vote is pretty soon to call out samefagging.

But the misspelling is both atrocious, consistent, and distinctive for both ID's.
>>
>>4105576
(1) Penance for the Sin of Falsehood. Select One.
>”Chapter II, verse XII. Utter no word but the truth. And, if the truth should elude thee, utter no word.” Sir Andrei is may utter no word until he kisses the feet of the Holy Figurehead in Port Bounty. [Sworn to Silence]

(2) Penance for the Sin of Doubt. Select One.
>”Chapter I, verse XXVI. Faith is the staple of the brave, not the wise. A man without doubt does not hesitate to grasp the lightning.” At the next Vigil in Pascae, Sir Andrei must actively seek to be struck by lightning during the storm. This could very well kill him. [Leap of Faith]

(3) The Visions. Select One.
>The Angel has not sworn you to silence, but nor has it bid you to speak of its appearances to any other soul. You will hold your tongue for now, and await Heaven’s command. [Haughty] + [Idealist]
>>
I really love this quest, but I decided I'm going to give up 4Chan for Lent. See you kniggas again after Easter.
>>
>>4106299
Peace be with you, knigga.
>>
>>4105576
>(1) Penance for the Sin of Falsehood. Select One.
>>”Chapter II, verse XII. Utter no word but the truth. And, if the truth should elude thee, utter no word.” Sir Andrei is may utter no word until he kisses the feet of the Holy Figurehead in Port Bounty. [Sworn to Silence]


(2) Penance for the Sin of Doubt. Select One.
>”Chapter I, verse LX. The lash wielded by thine own hand leaves a deeper mark than any master’s whip.” Sir Andrei is reduced to Battered health status until he arrives at Port Bounty. [Flagellation]

-
(3) The Visions. Select One.
>The Angel has not sworn you to silence, but nor has it bid you to speak of its appearances to any other soul. You will hold your tongue for now, and await Heaven’s command. [Haughty] + [Idealist]
>>
>>4106299
Almighty Bless your Lent
>>4105576
>”Chapter II, verse XII. Utter no word but the truth. And, if the truth should elude thee, utter no word.” Sir Andrei is may utter no word until he kisses the feet of the Holy Figurehead in Port Bounty. [Sworn to Silence]
>”Chapter I, verse XXVI. Faith is the staple of the brave, not the wise. A man without doubt does not hesitate to grasp the lightning.” At the next Vigil in Pascae, Sir Andrei must actively seek to be struck by lightning during the storm. This could very well kill him. [Leap of Faith]
>The Angel has not sworn you to silence, but nor has it bid you to speak of its appearances to any other soul. You will hold your tongue for now, and await Heaven’s command. [Haughty] + [Idealist]

If Emile dies I'm peacing tf out
>>
>>4106306
>>4105576
Changing my vote for #2 to

>”Chapter I, verse XXVI. Faith is the staple of the brave, not the wise. A man without doubt does not hesitate to grasp the lightning.” At the next Vigil in Pascae, Sir Andrei must actively seek to be struck by lightning during the storm. This could very well kill him. [Leap of Faith]

>>4106309
Makes this a win/win.

Not like we could roll exactly wrong to get hit by lightning, amirite?
>>
Rip I'm late to the party. Well here's my anchor for future posts I guess.
>>
>>4106309
Anons are making a lot of risky choices of late, honestly we're really risking it by being literally one roll away from death, I feel like the lack of major consequences so far has kind of contributed to this(How did we not even get like a fine or debt for injuring the dukes son or whatever lol)
>>
>>4106477
>How did we not even get like a fine or debt for injuring the dukes son or whatever lol

Because it's a tourney and injury is expected. It'd be a pretty shitty and petty lord who "fined" a knight for injuring a contestant in a tourney
>>
>>4106482
We almost got disappeared, too, and had to overcome a challenge scenario to avoid BAD END.
>>
>>4105576
>>”Chapter II, verse IX. In His eyes, status and wealth are equally worthless. Purity of the soul is the Almighty’s currency.” Sir Andrei may enjoy no luxury until he arrives at Port Bounty, he gains no bonus from Wealth status or attire. [Penury]
>”Chapter I, verse XXVI. Faith is the staple of the brave, not the wise. A man without doubt does not hesitate to grasp the lightning.” At the next Vigil in Pascae, Sir Andrei must actively seek to be struck by lightning during the storm. This could very well kill him. [Leap of Faith]
>The Angel has not sworn you to silence, but nor has it bid you to speak of its appearances to any other soul. You will hold your tongue for now, and await Heaven’s command. [Haughty] + [Idealist]
>>
File: Touched by god.jpg (17 KB, 236x317)
17 KB
17 KB JPG
>>4106477
Come on, it's really unlikely we'll get a nat 100.

And lightning strikes leave awesome looking trauma.

If it happens and we survive, we can view it as amazing stigmata. Maybe even get a vision while unconscious.
>>
File: Draconic Stigmata.jpg (105 KB, 700x811)
105 KB
105 KB JPG
>>4106610
>>4106477
Here's a healed scar.
>>
>>4106477
>nearly die to a basilisk being only saved by Kid by a hairs breath
>not a consequence of fucking about in Fallavon and conspiracies

Lady Vancewell is going to manipulate the shit out of the Marquis to embitter him to us, just because we haven't suffered the full consequences of our actions yet doesn't mean they aren't in the pipes
>>
How mad will Mom be once she finds out we sought out a lighting strike?
>>
>>4106805
You mean "proud".
>>
>>4106299
Fare you well, knigga
>>
File: Hermit Knight.jpg (114 KB, 1208x1600)
114 KB
114 KB JPG
>>4106610
>>4106614
Is that legit? Neat, I'll have to look up what actually happens to lightning survivors.

--------

Vote closed. Looks Emile is keen to ride the lightning. Fuck me if this actually kills you, I gave you fair warning well ahead of time.

>”Chapter II, verse IX. In His eyes, status and wealth are equally worthless. Purity of the soul is the Almighty’s currency.” Sir Andrei may enjoy no luxury until he arrives at Port Bounty, he gains no bonus from Wealth status or attire. [Penury]

>”Chapter I, verse XXVI. Faith is the staple of the brave, not the wise. A man without doubt does not hesitate to grasp the lightning.” At the next Vigil in Pascae, Sir Andrei must actively seek to be struck by lightning during the storm. This could very well kill him. [Leap of Faith]

>The Angel has not sworn you to silence, but nor has it bid you to speak of its appearances to any other soul. You will hold your tongue for now, and await Heaven’s command. [Haughty] + [Idealist]

With your penance tasks assigned, you ensure you are shorn of any comforts and overt indications of wealth. Mikail sees that Orin puts your fashionable attire and military tabard securely away as your own brother needles you for you plain garb.

"So your own kind gifts you with a fetching tabard and you immediately take a vow of penury?" Young Lord Damien grumbles. "Reginae wept, man. You could have just said you didn't like it..."

"That was ill said, sir. The good Sir Andrei is treating his task of penance with the gravity and sincerity it deserves." The reproval in Sir dan Marc's voice is measured, given Damien's seniority, but your sworn man at least seems to approve of you making more than a token gesture when carrying out your penance.

The Vow of Penury you had to explain, but you are not quite sure how to describe the daunting Vow of Faith that Father Towbray set for you. You would prefer your brother's needling to his genuine concern for your health and sanity, you doubt that larrakin sibling of yours would understand. You are nervous already, and Port Bounty is still many weeks away, but perhaps that very uncertainty is what makes this daring leap of faith so necessary for the good of your soul. Father Towbray is a harsh confessor, but one you find refreshing for the soul moreso than the lacklustre chaplain of House Norveski. Cain on the Cross, had it really been that long since your last confession? You resolve to take confession more routinely.

[1/3]
>>
File: West Fallavon Orchards.jpg (127 KB, 900x715)
127 KB
127 KB JPG
A few days later...

Tunegan, 11th Day of Novrimun, 883 A.C.E. – West Fallavon Roads

Your new nag Charlie is a very pleasant horse to ride. Demure and past his prime, the gelding does not require your constant attention and respect to keep him in line as Hannibal does. So the days riding in the West Fallavon countryside pass by quite agreeably, you allow yourself to relax as your entourage passes from one habituated hamlet to another without ever needing to stop and make camp on the unfenced forest edge itself. While the golden fields of Aubres is famous for its grain exports, here you can see firsthand the lush breadbasket of agrarian Fallavon. You have seen orchards of every type of fruit tree and berry bush in the few days since you set out; plums, apples, grape and strawberry of all sorts and sizes. Natural and engineered ponds both, for the farming eels and geese and a hundred other delicacies besides. Lumberyards ring with the chop and hack of saw on wood, wheeling in great lumber and carting out planks of solid wood. Most of these goods seem to be headed to Pascae, or rather its ports, but plenty of traffic goes every which way to the other Duchies or petty fiefs of Fallavon itself.

You are distracted from your reverie as Hannibal nickers at one of the inattentive pilgrim’s passing too close by. The sound is more half-hearted than his usual neighs of indignation at presence of anyone except yourself, your squire and perhaps Brother Rousseau. Clearly a month eating and sleeping to his great heart’s content has mellowed him out somewhat. His coat has a healthy sheen to it and his pace is much more energetic and springy than it was on the road from Aubrey.

[2/3]
>>
File: Hannibal STRONK.png (192 KB, 737x720)
192 KB
192 KB PNG
[3/3]

”No! Saint’s teeth, you dolt!” Mikail’s uncharacteristically snappish tone draws your attention. Orin’s hand has frozen from being about to seize Hannibal’s bridle, doubtless his intention was to tug your great brown destrier away from the path of the oblivious pilgrim. “ You ain’t never, -never- to touch Sir Andrei’s warhorse! Hannibal ain’t the concern of the likes of you, ye hear? That beastie will bite your bloody head off, if milord doesn’t cut it from your sorry shoulders first!”

The squabbling of your hirelings and their discipline is, of course, beneath you. But you take it as an encouraging sign that your squire is warming to his role as a peer in charge of others. Albeit his approach could be honed more towards ‘commanding’ rather than ‘bossy’.

”Milord, them holy knights ‘as done fair well by Hannibal.” Your squire rides up beside you. You allow Mikail a slight nod in response to his apologetic expression sent your way, as if you had barely noticed the earlier exchange. “I were thinking we’d keep his bridle and such off while we was on the road, only gear ‘im up and the like when milord wishes to ride off and slay something. Charlie ain’t a bad looking horse, no sire, if milord wishes he can do you for the long stretches ahead.”

Your squire makes a good point. Even if he is a rubbish rider himself the boy at least seems to know his business as a stablehand. You are loathe to refrain from the comfortable companionship of Hannibal as your dedicated mount as your squire suggests, but keeping him well rested at all times will mean those occasions you do take him into battle will ensure that he is performing at peak proficiency. On the other hand, should you find yourself caught unawares on the road, you would rather already be mounted on Hannibal than astride Charlie when the unexpected attack comes.

===============================================================

>Hannibal hails from a lineage of beasts bred for war nearly as long and illustrious as your own household. He must remain well-rested and in pristine condition at all times. You will ride him when you mean to make war or sport, and not before. [Haughty]

>Hannibal deserves a break, but you will not pamper the big brute. You will switch between him and Charlie often enough that he is not tired, but also work him when you do ride at leisure to keep him in fit enough shape and accustomed to riders. [Hearty]

>Hannibal is a princely beast, but a Warhorse is a resource you cannot spare. While you ride Charlie Mikail will intermittently try riding Hannibal, until he is confident in the saddle. That way you can both keep up your squire’s sword lessons and improve his horsemanship. [Idealist]
>>
>>4106898
>>Hannibal deserves a break, but you will not pamper the big brute. You will switch between him and Charlie often enough that he is not tired, but also work him when you do ride at leisure to keep him in fit enough shape and accustomed to riders. [Hearty]


Obviously we can't over work him anymore but we definitely can't let him get soft and fat. He's a warhorse

On another note Forgotten, where exactly is Port Bounty?
>>
>>4106898
>>Hannibal deserves a break, but you will not pamper the big brute. You will switch between him and Charlie often enough that he is not tired, but also work him when you do ride at leisure to keep him in fit enough shape and accustomed to riders. [Hearty]
>>4106890
The salt will be real if we die from the lightning even by normal thread standards
>>
>>4106898
>>Hannibal is a princely beast, but a Warhorse is a resource you cannot spare. While you ride Charlie Mikail will intermittently try riding Hannibal, until he is confident in the saddle. That way you can both keep up your squire’s sword lessons and improve his horsemanship. [Idealist]

This also gives Hannibal a workout by having Mikail ride him. Best use of our resources.
>>
>>4106898
>Hannibal is a princely beast, but a Warhorse is a resource you cannot spare. While you ride Charlie Mikail will intermittently try riding Hannibal, until he is confident in the saddle. That way you can both keep up your squire’s sword lessons and improve his horsemanship. [Idealist]

>I'll have to look up what actually happens to lightning survivors.
nothing good I presume
>>
>>4106898
>>Hannibal deserves a break, but you will not pamper the big brute. You will switch between him and Charlie often enough that he is not tired, but also work him when you do ride at leisure to keep him in fit enough shape and accustomed to riders. [Hearty]
>>
>>4106898
>Hannibal is a princely beast, but a Warhorse is a resource you cannot spare. While you ride Charlie Mikail will intermittently try riding Hannibal, until he is confident in the saddle. That way you can both keep up your squire’s sword lessons and improve his horsemanship. [Idealist]
I'm blaming those copper clippers if Emile dies to a Almightly-damned lightning strike. Fucking copper clippers...
>>
>>4106890
> Fuck me if this actually kills you, I gave you fair warning well ahead of time.

The new adventures of Sir Florence "the Ciseaux", wealthy scion of a Pascae trading house of Lise, recently acquiring the title of Comte through marriage. In lieu of traditional lands, the House of Lise owns properties in many territories, leading the main family to refer to themselves as "du Lise" after acquiring a noble title, but not the land normally attached to it.

Raised this far by wealth, Florence seeks to secure his position by inheriting the title of Comte. Something that will require somehow either managing to purchase the debts of his mothers County from those who arranged her families downfall, or getting one of his own by force, marriage, or coin.

Support from his father will depend on how much of a return he can make on what wealth his father invests in him.

Witness now the rise (and possibly fall) of the Clipper of Copper, Florence "the Ciseaux" du Lise. Money is Power.

> The "fiorino d'oro" of the Republic of Florence was the first European gold coin struck in sufficient quantities since the seventh century to play a significant commercial role.

> The design of the original Florentine florins was the distinctive fleur-de-lis badge of the city on one side and on the other a standing and facing figure of St. John the Baptist wearing a hair shirt.
>>
>>4106898
>>Hannibal deserves a break, but you will not pamper the big brute. You will switch between him and Charlie often enough that he is not tired, but also work him when you do ride at leisure to keep him in fit enough shape and accustomed to riders. [Hearty]
>>
>>4106898
>Hannibal hails from a lineage of beasts bred for war nearly as long and illustrious as your own household. He must remain well-rested and in pristine condition at all times. You will ride him when you mean to make war or sport, and not before. [Haughty]
>>
>>4106898
>Hannibal hails from a lineage of beasts bred for war nearly as long and illustrious as your own household. He must remain well-rested and in pristine condition at all times. You will ride him when you mean to make war or sport, and not before. [Haughty]

Besides, it would be inappropriate to ride him while penitent. We must remember a Knight is made by his Vows, not his blade. We shall be the most humble penitents before all others humility!
>>
>>4106898
>Hannibal deserves a break, but you will not pamper the big brute. You will switch between him and Charlie often enough that he is not tired, but also work him when you do ride at leisure to keep him in fit enough shape and accustomed to riders. [Hearty]

There would've been no point in buying Charlie if we don't let Hannibal to get some rest.

I think it will be a good idea to pass down Hannibal to Mikail later on once we've got a mustang or pegasus. Definitely not selling based Hannibal after all we've been through with him that's for sure.
>>
>>4106898
>Hannibal deserves a break, but you will not pamper the big brute. You will switch between him and Charlie often enough that he is not tired, but also work him when you do ride at leisure to keep him in fit enough shape and accustomed to riders. [Hearty]
>>
>>4106898
>Hannibal deserves a break, but you will not pamper the big brute. You will switch between him and Charlie often enough that he is not tired, but also work him when you do ride at leisure to keep him in fit enough shape and accustomed to riders. [Hearty]
>>
>>4106915
That's a nice ambitious copperclipper if I ever saw one.
>>
>>4106898
>Hannibal deserves a break, but you will not pamper the big brute. You will switch between him and Charlie often enough that he is not tired, but also work him when you do ride at leisure to keep him in fit enough shape and accustomed to riders. [Hearty]

>>4106923
Good idea since Mikail is Emile's squire and one of his duties is to take care of and handle the knight's steed. Hannibal has dealt with Mikail and has been taken care of by Mikail so many times for so long that Hannibal has grown accustomed and used to Mikail almost as much as Hannibal has with Emile.
>>
>>4106898
>Hannibal deserves a break, but you will not pamper the big brute. You will switch between him and Charlie often enough that he is not tired, but also work him when you do ride at leisure to keep him in fit enough shape and accustomed to riders. [Hearty]
>>
>>4106931
Thanks!

Mostly I just really wanted to work a Florentine/Fleur-de-lise pun in.

But I did stop and think "what could make me want to play a copper clipping Knight?" and a definitive goal to resolve a past injustice of his mother, while being in a powerful but precarious position both externally (retaining the title of Nobility) and internally (the most important thing to his father and Lord is retaining or promoting their noble rank in the family) would give the character complex motivations to succeed by copper clipping.

Maybe balance out the wealth by having to support a larger force under the character, or have options to send wealth home for support from the main house, etc. Not sure how much Forgotten would want to flesh out an economic system, but there are lots of ways to make spending wealth more relevant.

But it's all just fun nonsense talk.

Because Emile will never die, right?
>>
EMILE ANDREI IN THE GRAVE TONIGHT
>>
>>4106898
>>Hannibal is a princely beast, but a Warhorse is a resource you cannot spare. While you ride Charlie Mikail will intermittently try riding Hannibal, until he is confident in the saddle. That way you can both keep up your squire’s sword lessons and improve his horsemanship. [Idealist]
>>
>>4106898
>Hannibal is a princely beast, but a Warhorse is a resource you cannot spare. While you ride Charlie Mikail will intermittently try riding Hannibal, until he is confident in the saddle. That way you can both keep up your squire’s sword lessons and improve his horsemanship. [Idealist]
>>
>>4106898
>>Hannibal is a princely beast, but a Warhorse is a resource you cannot spare. While you ride Charlie Mikail will intermittently try riding Hannibal, until he is confident in the saddle. That way you can both keep up your squire’s sword lessons and improve his horsemanship. [Idealist]
>>
>>4106915
This is great

>>4106961
Anything really went out the window once Rosseau died in terms of MC safety, kniggas just need to roll with the punches for its an established fact that a kniggas safety is not guranteed in the pursuit of chivalry.

as for the copperclipper prince you've got maybe add a Langlish connection since they are the closest approximation to the Italians we have on hand though I swear Pascae had an italian influence and a small army could be interesting particularly given things afoot in Canton.

I personally see lady Vancewell being particularly interesting to such a man driven by wealth and ambition.
>>
>>4106898
>Hannibal deserves a break, but you will not pamper the big brute. You will switch between him and Charlie often enough that he is not tired, but also work him when you do ride at leisure to keep him in fit enough shape and accustomed to riders. [Hearty]
>>
>>4106898
>Hannibal deserves a break, but you will not pamper the big brute. You will switch between him and Charlie often enough that he is not tired, but also work him when you do ride at leisure to keep him in fit enough shape and accustomed to riders. [Hearty]
>>
>>4106898
>>Hannibal deserves a break, but you will not pamper the big brute. You will switch between him and Charlie often enough that he is not tired, but also work him when you do ride at leisure to keep him in fit enough shape and accustomed to riders. [Hearty]

Going with this since it means both Hannibal and Charlie will be rested and not tired.

When we do the leap of faith, we should take off all of our armour and weapons as well as anything else that is conducive to lightning. Wear a rain cloak too.
>>
>>4106898

>Hannibal deserves a break, but you will not pamper the big brute. You will switch between him and Charlie often enough that he is not tired, but also work him when you do ride at leisure to keep him in fit enough shape and accustomed to riders. [Hearty
Hearty for life
>>4105909
This is me.
>>
>>4107140
The ieda is that we have to try to get hit by the lighting bolt.
>>
>>4106915
Should be de Lise, du sounds awkward in this case
>>
>>4107268
Yes, but that doesn't mean we shouldn't take measures to protect ourselves for when we get hit. It's a leap of faith and not a leap of death for suicide.

Metallic objects in contact with the skin concentrate the lightning's energy, given it is a better natural conductor and the preferred pathway, resulting in more serious injuries, such as burns from molten or evaporating metal.
>>
>>4107277
I actually checked on titles.

> In France (and England, largely as a result of the Norman Conquest) the particle de precedes a nom de terre ("name of land") in many families of the French nobility (for example, Maximilien de Béthune).[1] A few do not have this particle (for example, Pierre Séguier, Lord Chancellor of France). The particle can also be du ("of the" in the masculine form), d' (employed, in accordance with the rules of orthography, when the nom de terre begins with a vowel; for example, Ferdinand d'Orléans), or des ("of the" in the plural). In French, de indicates a link between the land and a person—either landlord or peasant.

I figured, "du" was more practical given the fact that the Comte or Count title isn't technically inheritable without the land that Florence' mothers family lost.

So using the masculine "du" would technically slide around that, while also being more aggressive as a statement of intent.

I ended up putting way too much thought into a character we'll never use.
>>
>>4107329
We might naver use it but qm could use him as a dickhead we end up meating latter on.

>>4107282
Well get what you saying and normal i would say we should naver be trying to get hit anyways but this is a penace and people are dumb when it comes to these things.
Il vote with you if it comes to it.
>>
>>4106898
>Hannibal deserves a break, but you will not pamper the big brute. You will switch between him and Charlie often enough that he is not tired, but also work him when you do ride at leisure to keep him in fit enough shape and accustomed to riders. [Hearty]
>>
>>4107361
They're not dumb and they don't care about the penance. They know exactly what they're doing and their intention/agenda is very clear. They're just trying to get Emile killed by constantly voting for the choices that are most likely to result in Emile's death so they can get that faggy copper clipper character concept instead. Same thing with what happened with the basilisk. Copper clippers are copper clippers.
>>
>>4106964
I can just imagine his mother's reaction
"Emile chose to Grasp the Lightning as penance"
" He WHAT?!?"
>>
>>4107373
Was talking more to do with the people in the story not irl peoples that voted for bolt grabing like there Zeus which is also dumb though it might have to do with not wanting to be battered in case of a fight and lighting only has a 1 in 100 chnace of killing us well 3out of 100 counting 3 rollers.
Risk of death latter for an better chance of living right now.

Still a dumb idea.
Mums probs beating our dad for letting us go.
>>
Rolled 12 (1d100)

>>4107402
It's only 1 roll of 100
Observe
>>
Rolled 24 (1d100)

>>4107409
No you
>>
Rolled 74 (1d100)

>>4106898
What happens if we get struck by lightning? I imagine we would roll for injury but get a badass scar and a bonus in martial and courtly settings?
>>4107418
no YOU
>>
>>4107361
> qm could use him as a dickhead we end up meating latter on.

Excuse me, I put actual effort into making him not a dickhead.

Instead of the selfish pursuit of a second son seeking to raise his name, Florence bears the weight of both reclaiming his Mothers land from debt as well as the Lise House' ambitions to sucessfully become hereditary Nobility.

Nothing keeping him from honoring contracts, being pious, etc.

No reason he would have to be antagonistic should he appear.
>>
>>4107282
Wait I might be retarded, but isnt it literally the opposite, If the metal stuff we're wearing is a better conducter than our meat and bones than wouldnt most of the current go through without harming us? like how youre supposed to stay in your car in a lighting storm. I dont think lightning is strong enough to melt steel, Correct me if I'm wrong though
>>
>>4107402
>though it might have to do with not wanting to be battered in case of a fight
since when been crippled is better than being battered out of curiosity
>>
>>4107459
In a direct lightning strike, the electrical currents in the flash channel pass directly through the receiver. The high voltage drop around poorer electrical conductors (such as a human being), causes the surrounding air to ionize and break down, and the external flashover diverts most of the main discharge current so that it passes "around" the body, reducing injury.
>>
>>4107465
sure, but if im reading that right, would wearing say, a full plate of armor serve the same function since the current passes around the body either way?
>>
>>4107500
No since metal is a far better electrical conductor than a human being. Metal receives far higher voltages, resulting in far more serious injuries. If he gets hit by a lightning strike, Emile would turn what could've been serious injuries into merely superficial wounds by not having anything metallic with him.

Contrary to common belief, deep burns are rare. They occur in few lightning injuries. Most burns are superficial.
>>
>>4107528
OK so I looked it up and the current would only go through the armor, leaving you unexposed to the actual electric charge, but the heat dissipated from travelling though a conductor is still more than enough to cook you. So I guess we came to the same conclusion anyway.
>>
>>4106890
Straight of google image search. Fractal scarring.

>Hannibal hails from a lineage of beasts bred for war nearly as long and illustrious as your own household. He must remain well-rested and in pristine condition at all times. You will ride him when you mean to make war or sport, and not before. [Haughty]
>>
>>4106898
>>4107563
Actually switching to

>Hannibal is a princely beast, but a Warhorse is a resource you cannot spare. While you ride Charlie Mikail will intermittently try riding Hannibal, until he is confident in the saddle. That way you can both keep up your squire’s sword lessons and improve his horsemanship. [Idealist]

Gotta make the best use of what we got.
>>
>>4107463
I voted for battered was just trying to make the bolt grabing sounds reasonable to me, thats all.
>>
>>4106898

>Hannibal is a princely beast, but a Warhorse is a resource you cannot spare. While you ride Charlie Mikail will intermittently try riding Hannibal, until he is confident in the saddle. That way you can both keep up your squire’s sword lessons and improve his horsemanship. [Idealist]

We really need to jumpstar our Squire´s training if we aim to take the Leap of Faith. Also, it will finally allow us to get him to learn to read and write
>>
>>4107329
No I'm telling you there's no distinction between de, du, d', des and so on, just what is gramatically correct and what isn't
du would be suited for a region name (du Trégor, du Gâtinais, etc), or rarely when the name comes from the castle of X (du guesclin, du Bellay) with X being masculine like a village
du cannot work here because a city or town is feminine, not masculine
>>
>>4107749
I'm telling you, they don't have land to be from so that's why they do the "du".
>>
File: FB_IMG_1532999261670.jpg (57 KB, 564x833)
57 KB
57 KB JPG
>>4107789
Dude, if you want to use a French-sounding name you should follow the proper grammatical rules. Lys is male, Lise is female. You can't use ''du'' for female names in that way, as its almost exclusively masculine. It doesn't really matter if they are landed or not, and it doesn't make it sound aggressive either, only dumb.
I quite like your idea, that roleplay would be incredibly interesting.
>>
File: FB_IMG_1515528332745.jpg (431 KB, 1822x2048)
431 KB
431 KB JPG
>>4106898

>Hannibal is a princely beast, but a Warhorse is a resource you cannot spare. While you ride Charlie Mikail will intermittently try riding Hannibal, until he is confident in the saddle. That way you can both keep up your squire’s sword lessons and improve his horsemanship. [Idealist]

Mikail too is a resource we would do well to use in its proper way. Make him a better rider, a better man, so he can make us proud.
>>
>>4107838
Sound Lys out for me. I just added an "e" to lis from Fleur de Lis.

Anyways French grammer is third worst in the world.
>>
>>4106898
>>Hannibal is a princely beast, but a Warhorse is a resource you cannot spare. While you ride Charlie Mikail will intermittently try riding Hannibal, until he is confident in the saddle. That way you can both keep up your squire’s sword lessons and improve his horsemanship. [Idealist]
>>
I pray that the copper clippers will struck down by lightning and not Sir Andrei.
>>
A part of me actually hopes we'll get a nat 100 on the lighting roll. Just imagine the keks and rage that would happen
>>
>>4107969
It'll be like Gabriel again but with no excuses this time
>>
>>4107969
I hope we get a nat 1 and become one with the lightning
>>
>>4108010
Get a sweet stigmata and carcinogenic magical powers?
>>
>>4107373
>They know exactly what they're doing and their intention/agenda is very clear. They're just trying to get Emile killed by constantly voting for the choices that are most likely to result in Emile's death

Haha oh wow
>>
>>4108094
Reeeeeeeeee!

> https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=ifDs46V40sk
>>
>>4107373
Imagine thinking people are secretly trying to get the MC we love killed just so we can start all over again. Mate people are just picking fun/interesting options. The lightning dodging penance is great, not only is it cool and exciting but if we manage to crit success it, it'll be an incredible feat and feed into our whole "chosen by god" thing we've got going on. A song for the bards so to speak
>>
>>4108174
>>
>>4108199
How the fuck are you gonna have time to do all this?
>>
>>4108258
Emile doesn't know to do those things anyways.

But as it says, if your hair begins to stand on end or your skin starts to tingle immediately get into position.
>>
>>4106898
>Hannibal is a princely beast, but a Warhorse is a resource you cannot spare. While you ride Charlie Mikail will intermittently try riding Hannibal, until he is confident in the saddle. That way you can both keep up your squire’s sword lessons and improve his horsemanship. [Idealist]
>>
>Hannibal is a princely beast, but a Warhorse is a resource you cannot spare. While you ride Charlie Mikail will intermittently try riding Hannibal, until he is confident in the saddle. That way you can both keep up your squire’s sword lessons and improve his horsemanship. [Idealist]

“Your concern for Hannibal’s well-being does you credit, my boy. But I disagree. Hannibal has had a soft time of it lately, we wouldn’t want him to grow lazy and indolent now would we? Say…” You glance back at the quizzical Mikail, as if the idea had only just occurred to you. “How about you try riding him in the morning, before we stop for your lessons? A little exercise for the big brute, and some invaluable experience for you in how to handle yourself on a real horse.”

“You… you’re sure, milord?” Mikail eyes Hannibal with a nervousness that wasn’t present before. The massive charger glares back at the lad and nickers, as if laughing at the prospect of this little twig of a human presuming to do anything except change his feed.

“Am I ever anything but?” You laugh with false surety, hoping that Hannibal doesn’t kill the lad the first time he tries to saddle up. “No, I think you are ready Mikail. Really. Probably”

Your muttered ‘probably’ at the end of the sentence does little to calm your squire’s nerves.

“A silver mark says the boy lands on his head the first day.” The Green Knight chuckles, much to the more sensible Sir dan Marc’s disapproval.

It surprises all three of you when Brother Rousseau gestures that he will take that bet, but at 1:2 odds. This again does not do much to boost your squire’s confidence.

>Hannibal gains the Tired Trait.
>1st Week, -5DC to all riding related rolls. 2nd Week, -10DC. 3rd Week -10DC and +1 Adverse Riding/Dismount Re-Roll, etc…

Hannibal will retain this debuff until you acquire a second Warhorse or direct Mikail’s horsemanship lessons to cease. Port Bounty in South-West Pascae is 4 weeks travel, Mikail will have improved his horsemanship to basic competence in addition to his martial advancement if he is permitted to ride Hannibal intermittently until your arrival in Port Bounty.

[1/3]
>>
File: Hold on, Mikail.png (363 KB, 404x340)
363 KB
363 KB PNG
Fenegan, 14th Day of Novrimun, 883 A.C.E. - West Fallavon Roads

Mikail doesn’t land on his head the next day, or the day after that. Your brother seems far from disappointed in paying up, and he is almost vindicated on Wenegan the second day when Hannibal bolts off without warning, leaping a hedge and flinging the squire off into a none-too-soft landing like a dog shaking off a flea. It is a sound lesson for the bruised and battered Mikail that a Warhorse demands a knight’s constant vigilance and attention, lest their mount sense weakness in the herd leader.

When you insist on holding the usual sword lessons that afternoon, despite the boys bruises and aches, you imagine that more than a few pilgrims take the impression that you are a harsh taskmasker indeed.

But the boy is learning, no doubt about that.

[2/3]
>>
[3/3]

Your brother, or the ‘Green Knight’ rather, has taken to his role like a fish to water. Never taking off his helm, speaking in riddles and alluding to great (but vague) deeds of his chequered past. He is a mysterious wonder to the pilgrims, an intriguing curiosity to the handful of Knights Comitas in the escort and an absolute annoyance to yourself and the other members of your entourage that know his identity.

Nonetheless, your sworn man Sir Neil dan Marc is warming to the offered entertainment despite his cool opinion on the Young Lord’s all-too-liberal sympathies. He splutters with ill-concealed laughter when Damien flexes during his recounting of a battle with a ‘scarecrow’ in his youth. It is no word of a lie, but his ominous tone when speaking the word ‘scarecrow’ and his trumped up descriptions of near-death-encounters and close calls with the creature leaves the listening pilgrims believing that ‘The Scarecrow of Fabian’s Fields’ was some twisted monstrosity harassing the local village rather than a literal mannequin that you and your brother use to hit with sticks as children when you were playing at knights.

“And then, just I had torn the wicked beasts heads from its shoulders the terrible creature’s black-winged minions fell upon me and near drove me from the field!” You don’t approve of your brother purposefully misleading these smallfolk with his tall tales, but you are yourself struggling to contain a smirk as Sir dan Marc curls up clutching his chest and doing his level best not to cry with mirth.

Such levity is easily found in the convoy since you set out from Motte-Fallavon. On these laidback days of travel in what feels like safe and relatively civilised farmland the perils of the deep woods seem far and away. You allow yourself to relax, to loosen your shoulders and let some of the tension.

========================================

> Good cheer and hearty companionship is all well and good, but you find yourself hanging back in the rear of the caravan. The watchful silence of Jess the Kid compliments the contented peace of Brother Rousseau well enough, it is nice to sit back and enjoy the scenery every now and then. [Haughty]

> This is the kind of jovial companionship you had always looked forward to on the road when you had imagined yourself setting out on errantry. You ride at the head of the convoy with Sir dan Marc, the Green Knight and other Knights Comitas, joking with the best of them. [Hearty]

>You contribute little, but you pay attention to their back-and-forth theological debates between Sister Ignatius and Father Towbray in the middle of the convoy as well as you can. You have the impression that, if not for your presence, their philosophical disagreements would spill over into animosity. [Idealist]
>>
>>4108383
>>4107940
>>4107843
>>4107610
>>4107577
>>4107021
>>4106992
>>4106971
>>4106914
>>4106910
>>4106906


>>4106903
>>4106904
>>4106912
>>4106917
>>4106923
>>4106927
>>4106928
>>4106932
>>4106943
>>4107055
>>4107062
>>4107140
>>4107362


Forgotten I think you you got the vote count wrong. Hearty has more votes.
>>
>>4108467
>> This is the kind of jovial companionship you had always looked forward to on the road when you had imagined yourself setting out on errantry. You ride at the head of the convoy with Sir dan Marc, the Green Knight and other Knights Comitas, joking with the best of them. [Hearty]

I fucking love Damien, can he just ride with us forever as the Green Knight? Fuck being a Lord
>>
>>4108470
Forgot to include this>>4107263 vote too for hearty.
>>
>>4108470
Ah bugger, will go back and double-check. Should make for an easy enough amendment.

Thank you for setting me straight
>>
Vote is still open for the latest update
>>
Huh.

Oddly with that debuff, it might be good to allow Mikails training to be 1 week on, 1 week off.
>>
>>4108474
No problem. We all make makes mistakes.

>>4108467
>You contribute little, but you pay attention to their back-and-forth theological debates between Sister Ignatius and Father Towbray in the middle of the convoy as well as you can. You have the impression that, if not for your presence, their philosophical disagreements would spill over into animosity. [Idealist]
>>
>>4108467
>Good cheer and hearty companionship is all well and good, but you find yourself hanging back in the rear of the caravan. The watchful silence of Jess the Kid compliments the contented peace of Brother Rousseau well enough, it is nice to sit back and enjoy the scenery every now and then. [Haughty]
>>
>>4108467
>You contribute little, but you pay attention to their back-and-forth theological debates between Sister Ignatius and Father Towbray in the middle of the convoy as well as you can. You have the impression that, if not for your presence, their philosophical disagreements would spill over into animosity. [Idealist]
>>
>>4108467
>Good cheer and hearty companionship is all well and good, but you find yourself hanging back in the rear of the caravan. The watchful silence of Jess the Kid compliments the contented peace of Brother Rousseau well enough, it is nice to sit back and enjoy the scenery every now and then. [Haughty]
>>
>>4108467
>This is the kind of jovial companionship you had always looked forward to on the road when you had imagined yourself setting out on errantry. You ride at the head of the convoy with Sir dan Marc, the Green Knight and other Knights Comitas, joking with the best of them. [Hearty]
>>
>>4108467
> This is the kind of jovial companionship you had always looked forward to on the road when you had imagined yourself setting out on errantry. You ride at the head of the convoy with Sir dan Marc, the Green Knight and other Knights Comitas, joking with the best of them. [Hearty]
>>
>>4108467
>> This is the kind of jovial companionship you had always looked forward to on the road when you had imagined yourself setting out on errantry. You ride at the head of the convoy with Sir dan Marc, the Green Knight and other Knights Comitas, joking with the best of them. [Hearty]

Enjoy time with our bro. We'd not be seeing him for quite some time.
>>
>>4108467
>> Good cheer and hearty companionship is all well and good, but you find yourself hanging back in the rear of the caravan. The watchful silence of Jess the Kid compliments the contented peace of Brother Rousseau well enough, it is nice to sit back and enjoy the scenery every now and then. [Haughty]
>>
>>4108467
>This is the kind of jovial companionship you had always looked forward to on the road when you had imagined yourself setting out on errantry. You ride at the head of the convoy with Sir dan Marc, the Green Knight and other Knights Comitas, joking with the best of them. [Hearty]
>>
>>4108467
>You contribute little, but you pay attention to their back-and-forth theological debates between Sister Ignatius and Father Towbray in the middle of the convoy as well as you can. You have the impression that, if not for your presence, their philosophical disagreements would spill over into animosity. [Idealist]
>>
File: Spoiler Image (28 KB, 500x566)
28 KB
28 KB JPG
>>4108467
>You contribute little, but you pay attention to their back-and-forth theological debates between Sister Ignatius and Father Towbray in the middle of the convoy as well as you can. You have the impression that, if not for your presence, their philosophical disagreements would spill over into animosity. [Idealist]
my paranoic senses are tingling
>>
>>4108467
>This is the kind of jovial companionship you had always looked forward to on the road when you had imagined yourself setting out on errantry. You ride at the head of the convoy with Sir dan Marc, the Green Knight and other Knights Comitas, joking with the best of them. [Hearty]
>>
>>4108467
>You contribute little, but you pay attention to their back-and-forth theological debates between Sister Ignatius and Father Towbray in the middle of the convoy as well as you can. You have the impression that, if not for your presence, their philosophical disagreements would spill over into animosity. [Idealist]
>>
>>4108467
>> This is the kind of jovial companionship you had always looked forward to on the road when you had imagined yourself setting out on errantry. You ride at the head of the convoy with Sir dan Marc, the Green Knight and other Knights Comitas, joking with the best of them. [Hearty]
>>
>>4108467
>> This is the kind of jovial companionship you had always looked forward to on the road when you had imagined yourself setting out on errantry. You ride at the head of the convoy with Sir dan Marc, the Green Knight and other Knights Comitas, joking with the best of them. [Hearty]

This is a welcome change from battling demons,
>>
>>4108467
>> Good cheer and hearty companionship is all well and good, but you find yourself hanging back in the rear of the caravan. The watchful silence of Jess the Kid compliments the contented peace of Brother Rousseau well enough, it is nice to sit back and enjoy the scenery every now and then. [Haughty]
>>
>riding the lightning
y'all gonna kill Ser Andrei

>>4108467
>> Good cheer and hearty companionship is all well and good, but you find yourself hanging back in the rear of the caravan. The watchful silence of Jess the Kid compliments the contented peace of Brother Rousseau well enough, it is nice to sit back and enjoy the scenery every now and then. [Haughty]
>>
>>4108467
>> Good cheer and hearty companionship is all well and good, but you find yourself hanging back in the rear of the caravan. The watchful silence of Jess the Kid compliments the contented peace of Brother Rousseau well enough, it is nice to sit back and enjoy the scenery every now and then. [Haughty]
>>
>>4108467
>> This is the kind of jovial companionship you had always looked forward to on the road when you had imagined yourself setting out on errantry. You ride at the head of the convoy with Sir dan Marc, the Green Knight and other Knights Comitas, joking with the best of them. [Hearty]
>>
>>4108467
>This is the kind of jovial companionship you had always looked forward to on the road when you had imagined yourself setting out on errantry. You ride at the head of the convoy with Sir dan Marc, the Green Knight and other Knights Comitas, joking with the best of them. [Hearty]
>>
>>4108467
>> This is the kind of jovial companionship you had always looked forward to on the road when you had imagined yourself setting out on errantry. You ride at the head of the convoy with Sir dan Marc, the Green Knight and other Knights Comitas, joking with the best of them. [Hearty]
>>
>>4108467

> This is the kind of jovial companionship you had always looked forward to on the road when you had imagined yourself setting out on errantry. You ride at the head of the convoy with Sir dan Marc, the Green Knight and other Knights Comitas, joking with the best of them. [Hearty
On the yellow brick road of we go.
>>
>>4108467

> This is the kind of jovial companionship you had always looked forward to on the road when you had imagined yourself setting out on errantry. You ride at the head of the convoy with Sir dan Marc, the Green Knight and other Knights Comitas, joking with the best of them. [Hearty
On the yellow brick road of we go.

>>4107263
This is me as well.
>>
>>4108693
>>4108692
Well that was a werid double post from my phone thought i had stoped the frist one to link my past id on the new post.
Just count thies as one vote
>>
>>4108467
> Good cheer and hearty companionship is all well and good, but you find yourself hanging back in the rear of the caravan. The watchful silence of Jess the Kid compliments the contented peace of Brother Rousseau well enough, it is nice to sit back and enjoy the scenery every now and then. [Haughty]

Enjoy the silence.
>>
>>4107880
>>4108774
'Tis me.
>>
>>4108467
> This is the kind of jovial companionship you had always looked forward to on the road when you had imagined yourself setting out on errantry. You ride at the head of the convoy with Sir dan Marc, the Green Knight and other Knights Comitas, joking with the best of them. [Hearty]
Emile has literally gotten drunk and made a fool of himself every chance hes got, dont think he'd really be the strong and silent type.
>>
> This is the kind of jovial companionship you had always looked forward to on the road when you had imagined yourself setting out on errantry. You ride at the head of the convoy with Sir dan Marc, the Green Knight and other Knights Comitas, joking with the best of them. [Hearty]

knights before mites
>>
>>4108467
>You contribute little, but you pay attention to their back-and-forth theological debates between Sister Ignatius and Father Towbray in the middle of the convoy as well as you can. You have the impression that, if not for your presence, their philosophical disagreements would spill over into animosity. [Idealist]

We're in the middle of penance, no?
>>
>>4108467
>> This is the kind of jovial companionship you had always looked forward to on the road when you had imagined yourself setting out on errantry. You ride at the head of the convoy with Sir dan Marc, the Green Knight and other Knights Comitas, joking with the best of them. [Hearty]
>>
>>4108467
>> Good cheer and hearty companionship is all well and good, but you find yourself hanging back in the rear of the caravan. The watchful silence of Jess the Kid compliments the contented peace of Brother Rousseau well enough, it is nice to sit back and enjoy the scenery every now and then. [Haughty]
>>
File: FB_IMG_1471481202520.jpg (53 KB, 460x959)
53 KB
53 KB JPG
>>4108467
> This is the kind of jovial companionship you had always looked forward to on the road when you had imagined yourself setting out on errantry. You ride at the head of the convoy with Sir dan Marc, the Green Knight and other Knights Comitas, joking with the best of them. [Hearty]
>>
File: Dress to impress.gif (50 KB, 334x550)
50 KB
50 KB GIF
>>4109202
>>
>>4108467
>> This is the kind of jovial companionship you had always looked forward to on the road when you had imagined yourself setting out on errantry. You ride at the head of the convoy with Sir dan Marc, the Green Knight and other Knights Comitas, joking with the best of them. [Hearty]
>>
>>4108467
> This is the kind of jovial companionship you had always looked forward to on the road when you had imagined yourself setting out on errantry. You ride at the head of the convoy with Sir dan Marc, the Green Knight and other Knights Comitas, joking with the best of them. [Hearty]
>>
>>4108467
> Good cheer and hearty companionship is all well and good, but you find yourself hanging back in the rear of the caravan. The watchful silence of Jess the Kid compliments the contented peace of Brother Rousseau well enough, it is nice to sit back and enjoy the scenery every now and then. [Haughty]
>>
File: Laughing knights.jpg (162 KB, 500x277)
162 KB
162 KB JPG
Miscounted Vote

>Hannibal deserves a break, but you will not pamper the big brute. You will switch between him and Charlie often enough that he is not tired, but also work him when you do ride at leisure to keep him in fit enough shape and accustomed to riders. [Hearty]
>Hannibal will not gain the Tired Trait. I will assume, unless otherwise indicated, that you happen to be riding him in the event of an ambush on the moving convoy.

----------------------------------------------------

> This is the kind of jovial companionship you had always looked forward to on the road when you had imagined yourself setting out on errantry. You ride at the head of the convoy with Sir dan Marc, the Green Knight and other Knights Comitas, joking with the best of them. [Hearty]


Monegan, 17th Day of Novrimun, 883 A.C.E. - West Fallavon Roads
>Sore Shoulder reduced to -1DC

You had expected these new Comitas Knights to be something of a dour lot, the life of a holy knight not being something you would think given overmuch to jest and good humours. You turn out to be very much mistaken, as demonstrated when you ask them what you can expect in Port Bounty.

“Last time I was in Pascae, a young woman, somewhat of a simpleton, was on the point of delivering a baby. She had long been enduring acute pain, and the midwife, candle in hand, inspected her secret area, in order to ascertain if the child was coming. “Look also on the other side,” said the poor creature, “my husband has sometimes taken that road.”

Brother Gaspard speaks softly and wheezes with every laugh as you all guffaw, you later learn it is compliments of a damaged lung he received from breathing in noxious fumes while fighting some terrible spore-sprouting fungal monster on the eastern roads. Brother Cancicail is the youngest of you all, including Sir Neil dan Marc, and the one most impressed by the Green Knight’s boisterous tales and mysterious allure. Perhaps this is why he is also full of fairly ribald jokes regarding his past charges.

“I once had the pleasure of escorting the Bishop of Port Bounty, a very fat and corpulent man. Upon our arrival at Aubrey one evening he enquired of a peasant he met, “Do you think I shall be able to enter the gate?” Of course, he thus meant to ask whether he was likely to reach the city before the closing of the gates. But the country-man, rallying his stoutness, replied, “To be sure, you will; a cartload of hay gets through, why should not you?”

The chortle and laughter of you five knights and attendants at the head of the convoy is a frequent sound, one that lets the days and leagues pass quickly and gaily to your reckoning. It is on the eight day since your departure from Motte-Fallavon, well to the west of the Duchy lands, that your convoy encounters a posse of men bearing the green-black wolf of House Sinclair.

[1/3]
>>
File: Sir Jeanne Sinclair.png (10 KB, 281x273)
10 KB
10 KB PNG
“Hail, Sir Jean Sinclair!” You flip your visor in salute as you recognise the mounted knight at the head of the group of plain men-at-arms. They are clustered around a tree, tying a rope over a branch. “What’s this then? If I may be so bold.”

You reckon that your miscalculation with the Marquis in the melee made Sinclair warm to you more than any kind word could have. There seems to be little love lost between him and the Duke’s household.

“Hail, Sir Andrei the Bear. Of course you may.” The third son of Lord Sinclair and the cousin of the Maid Ava Sinclair salutes back. “A bit of housecleaning, you might say. We caught this runaway serf attempting to sneak off our lands, and here is where we shall hang him to make an example.”

You look down at the sobbing wretch, a pitiful example indeed. The teary-eyed dirty louse has scabbed limbs and rough fingernails, a lifetime of drudgery and hard work has done him few favours. Doubtless this is the type of discontent peasant that makes for ripe recruitment into the Bluejay bands.

“You’re going to hang him? For running away?” Sometimes you wish you could sow your idiot brother’s mouth shut. “What about just a flogging instead? A damn trial at least.”

[2/3]
>>
File: Sir Jean Sinclair 2.png (1.97 MB, 3272x1512)
1.97 MB
1.97 MB PNG
[3/3]

“A trial? For this pauper? Don’t make me laugh.” Sir Sinclair speaks with a cool tone. “And you are?”

“Apologies, Sir. I am the Green Knight, my name must remain a chief secret for now.” There is an exchange of glances between you and the other knights. This is taking an unpleasant turn. “My question stands though.”

“How… bold. I am not in the habit of explaining myself or our laws to outsiders. All land from this crossroad to the River Yerden in the West is under the remit of House Sinclair.” A dangerous tenor, one with an edge to it that makes you take note of how many man-at-arms he has at his disposal. The odds are heavily in your favour, but the last thing you want to do is start a fight with a Fallavon house. And, not to mention, it wouldn’t likely endear you to his female cousin at all. “I am charged with executing justice as I see fit, and I see fit to hang the wretch. If you take issue with my authority, say so. I could use the exercise.”

Sir Jean Sinclair’s position is clear. He is the law out here. Judge, jury and executioner as he sees fit. House Sinclair has a reputation for draconian frontier justice even in a Duchy renowned for it’s fast-and-loose enforcement of the law. Clearly it rankles at your brother’s sensitivities like a sore tooth.

------------------------------------------------------

> “You are the law here, good knight. No one is disputing that. Please excuse my companion’s passionate outburst.” The law is the law, even when the law is mete out harshly. Your brother knows nothing of the harsh measures necessary to maintain order out here. [Haughty]

>“How about a wager, Sir? Tails, the whip. Heads, the noose.” You attempt to defuse the situation with a gamble, making light of the whole situation. One wretched serf’s life is not worth knights coming to blows with one another over. [Hearty]

>“The Green Knight speaks true. This is not justice.” There is a difference between the law and justice. You don’t want to challenge the skilled Sir Sinclair to prove the point. But you will if you have to, better you than your peacock brother at any rate. [Idealist]
>>
>>4109839
>“The Green Knight speaks true. This is not justice.” There is a difference between the law and justice. You don’t want to challenge the skilled Sir Sinclair to prove the point. But you will if you have to, better you than your peacock brother at any rate. [Idealist]
>>
>>4109839
>“The Green Knight speaks true. This is not justice.” There is a difference between the law and justice. You don’t want to challenge the skilled Sir Sinclair to prove the point. But you will if you have to, better you than your peacock brother at any rate. [Idealist]

If we don't then our brother definitely will challenge him for a duel regardless of Emile's decision. Damien risked his life to save beastfolk slaves.
>>
>>4109839
> “You are the law here, good knight. No one is disputing that. Please excuse my companion’s passionate outburst.” The law is the law, even when the law is mete out harshly. Your brother knows nothing of the harsh measures necessary to maintain order out here. [Haughty]
>>
>>4109839
>> “You are the law here, good knight. No one is disputing that. Please excuse my companion’s passionate outburst.” The law is the law, even when the law is mete out harshly. Your brother knows nothing of the harsh measures necessary to maintain order out here. [Haughty]

"However good sir, if he is to pass by your judgement, I beg you allow him a final blessing and confession as befits any condemned's last rites. I'm sure the priests traveling with us will be happy to perform them."
>>
>>4109839
>“The Green Knight speaks true. This is not justice.” There is a difference between the law and justice. You don’t want to challenge the skilled Sir Sinclair to prove the point. But you will if you have to, better you than your peacock brother at any rate. [Idealist]
>>
>>4108500
My old id my current I'd if has changed >>4109846
>>
>>4109839
>“The Green Knight speaks true. This is not justice.” There is a difference between the law and justice. You don’t want to challenge the skilled Sir Sinclair to prove the point. But you will if you have to, better you than your peacock brother at any rate. [Idealist]
>>
>>4109839
>“The Green Knight speaks true. This is not justice.” There is a difference between the law and justice. You don’t want to challenge the skilled Sir Sinclair to prove the point. But you will if you have to, better you than your peacock brother at any rate. [Idealist]
>>
>>4109839
>> “You are the law here, good knight. No one is disputing that. Please excuse my companion’s passionate outburst.” The law is the law, even when the law is mete out harshly. Your brother knows nothing of the harsh measures necessary to maintain order out here. [Haughty]
>>
>>4109847
+1 support
>>
>>4109839
>> “You are the law here, good knight. No one is disputing that. Please excuse my companion’s passionate outburst.” The law is the law, even when the law is mete out harshly. Your brother knows nothing of the harsh measures necessary to maintain order out here. [Haughty]
and this >>4109847

Frankly... If our brother was to ask for a duel. This is fine. He is the heir apparent. He needs to cool his head of his. A good loss against a skilled opponent who will likely hold his sword against a lethal blow will be good for him.

That just a strong swordarm alone is insufficient to change the minds of others. He must be able to approach them and convince them through other means or he will not be a good lord.

If a duel does ensure, we should be his second. And should he lose, as 'The green knight's companion, we can easily sooth things out between Sir Jean and our party once it is over. Begging his indulgence due to our brother having too pure and eager a heart.
>>
>>4109839
>“The Green Knight speaks true. This is not justice.” There is a difference between the law and justice. You don’t want to challenge the skilled Sir Sinclair to prove the point. But you will if you have to, better you than your peacock brother at any rate. [Idealist]
>>
>>4109839
>Your authority isn't question Sir, these are your lands and I understand how the law is enforce in Motte-Fallavon. But I appeal to your authority for clemency, a hanged man can't make up for his cronies and mistakes.
>>
>>4109839
>“The Green Knight speaks true. This is not justice.” There is a difference between the law and justice. You don’t want to challenge the skilled Sir Sinclair to prove the point. But you will if you have to, better you than your peacock brother at any rate. [Idealist]

House Andrei won't be having any alliances or friendly relations with House Sinclair once Damien becomes Lord Andrei that's for sure.
>>
>>4109839
>> “You are the law here, good knight. No one is disputing that. Please excuse my companion’s passionate outburst.” The law is the law, even when the law is mete out harshly. Your brother knows nothing of the harsh measures necessary to maintain order out here. [Haughty]
When in Rome do as the Romans do. Once Damien inherits he can do whatever he wants on our lands.
>>
>>4109873
Depends i'd say. I hope he calms down as he matures and is less hot-headed. That he loves the common people is not a minus and will aid him in governing our home well but he'll do well to remember that his influence only spreads so far.

Luckily, his identity is secret for now and Romaine does have this thing where the womenfolk are the plotters and alliance-makers so we might still be able to maintain somewhat friendly relations.
>>
>>4109839
> “You are the law here, good knight. No one is disputing that. Please excuse my companion’s passionate outburst.” The law is the law, even when the law is mete out harshly. Your brother knows nothing of the harsh measures necessary to maintain order out here. [Haughty]
Add this >>4109847
>>
>>4109839

>“The Green Knight speaks true. This is not justice.” There is a difference between the law and justice. You don’t want to challenge the skilled Sir Sinclair to prove the point. But you will if you have to, better you than your peacock brother at any rate. [Idealist]

This is not justice but they do have the right to pass punishment and judgment among those that commit crimes on their lands and if anyone's going to pick or stand for a fight to be had I'd rather it be us rather than our brother
>>
>>4109866
Damien and Sinclair are too evenly matched for a duel between them to have a determined result. It will most likely be decided by a roll poll.

Sinclair doesn't know that the Green Knight is our brother so there's no guarantee he won't kill him if he wins.

Losing this duel won't change Damien's outlook or how he would've approached this. It will simply mean that he wasn't strong enough to win.

>>4109878
Damien is a Bluejay indebted to the Wytes with his life and he put his life on the line to free beastfolk slaves. It's not ''depends'' I say.
>>
>>4109839
>“You are the law here, good knight. No one is disputing that. Please excuse my companion’s passionate outburst.” The law is the law, even when the law is mete out harshly. Your brother knows nothing of the harsh measures necessary to maintain order out here. [Haughty]
>>
>>4109886
Me >>4106928
>>
>>4109839
>“The Green Knight speaks true. This is not justice.” There is a difference between the law and justice. You don’t want to challenge the skilled Sir Sinclair to prove the point. But you will if you have to, better you than your peacock brother at any rate. [Idealist]
Difficult choice, but considering we mercy killed old man jenkins way back, I'd rather stay consistent with Emile's moral compunctions. Emile may not have a high opinion of peasants, but Knights are meant to be shepards, not butchers.
>>
Remember that House Sinclair is fiercely independent even among those on Fallavon. Direct interference will be meet with more resistance to assert their authority, a subtler method has a great chance of success without causing offense.
>>
>>4109887
I wouldn't say he was a bluejay or indebted at all. He said himself it was an allegiance of convenience. He made a sacred vow and needed their help to fulfill it.
>>
>>4109904
He had his life saved by Tailor who was a bluejay and is indebted to them. He couldn't become an official member because they didn't let him, not because of any lack of desire to join them from his side.

>''My new friend, he could have turned me over. He had his own reasons for not doing so, I’m sure. But he risked his life to get me in with his rebel contacts and from there I joined them heading north.''

>''The people living in this forest, human or otherwise, they’re bystanders in all this. Victims. I can’t let them suffer while I save my own skin.”

>“Equality, where every man is entitled to the sweat of his own brow. Is it so outrageous to you, brother? Were I born in a farmstead rather than a castle I’d have doubtless long dropped the pitchfork and taken up the bow with these fellows.”

My point still stands that the result of a duel between him and Sinclair won't change his viewpoint/outlook, character, beliefs, or how he would've approached this.
>>
>>4109899
Yeah, don't forget this too:
>“To the just laws, a righteous man must obey. To the unjust laws, a righteous man must defy.”
-Emile

And the noblese oblige we've been constantly touting. I guess some think it's only noblese oblige when it's convenient and easy.
>>
>>4109937
This is really just the ugly side of that dynamic at play, they morally should be taken to task for not dealing a just punishment but as the law stands they are well within their right to judge and punish as they see fit.
>>
>>4109937
True, and that kind of ties into the fact that we just got told that we should tell the truth, even when its not convienant, even when further bloodshed might be prevented, although hopefully it wont go that far here. It will more than likely hurt our relations though.
>>
>>4109869
Good write-in but allow me to enhance it.

>>4109839
>Write-in
>''Your authority isn't questioned, Sir. These are your lands and I understand how the law is enforced in Motte-Fallavon. Allow me then to appeal to your authority as the judge for clemency, a hanged man can't make up for his cronies and mistakes. Besides, what good would hanging him do? The example you'd set here will simply result in more escapees, for they have nothing to lose that would deter them. Either they flee successfully and manage to escape their service, or they fail and receive the mercy of death that would still grant them escape from their service in life. That is the example that you will set here, Sir. My lord father, may the Almighty bless him with long life, taught me that the best fortress which a lord can possess is the affection of his people, for willing obedience always beats forced obedience.''

What do you think?
>>
>>4110078
Very good, I approved. I'm glad we had that conversation with Ava.
>>
>>4110078
Supporting this write-in.
This is the best choice, combining the fact that Emile wants to save the peasant BUT does not want to confront Jean Sinclair directly.
>>
>>4110121
>>4109839
Oops, forgot to quote Forgotten.
>>
>>4110078
Support
>>
>>4110124
You should quote the author or else he won't count your vote.
>>
>>4109839
>>4109882
Changing my vote to >>4110078
>>
>>4109839
>>4110078
Definitely supporting. This is a great write-in as it's in-character, makes many great points, and Sir Jean will look positively on an appeal from Emile because it recognizes his authority as judge not to mention that he warmed over to Emile after what happened with Marquis Fallavon.
>>
>>4109839
>“How about a wager, Sir? Tails, the whip. Heads, the noose.” You attempt to defuse the situation with a gamble, making light of the whole situation. One wretched serf’s life is not worth knights coming to blows with one another over. [Hearty
Though i would say if he gets hanged at lest let our priests make this guys soul rest in peace.
Hearty for life.
>>4108693
This is me
>>
Come on niggas, just let him be done with the serf
>>
>>4110078
>>4109839
+1

Excellent writein especially with that last bit at the end.
>>
>>4110078
it is good, in theory
i fear that in practice, telling a lord how to run his realm is asking for a kick in the cunt
i would be pissed
>>
>>4110152
Exactly this. I get the feeling that this write-in will blow up in our face
>>
>>4110078
>>4109839
This is good and I see literally no point in not choosing it so I'm supporting it. An appeal to the lord authority judge isn't telling him how to rule his lands.
>>
>>4110152
Yeah this is an extremely stupid course of action, this one is much more reasonable

>>4109869
>>4109839
>>Your authority isn't question Sir, these are your lands and I understand how the law is enforce in Motte-Fallavon. But I appeal to your authority for clemency, a hanged man can't make up for his cronies and mistakes.
>>
>>4110078
>>4109839
>>4109869
support
>>
>>4110078
>>4109839
+1
>>
>>4110078
>>4109839
Supporting
>>
File: images (3).jpg (23 KB, 383x384)
23 KB
23 KB JPG
>>4110078
Good luck trying to convince the Noble with the mentality of the weak should fear the STRONK, man is really a bad time to be on penury
>>
>>4110078
Supporting, nice job.
>>
Dont know if people have forgotten but we dont get any dc bonus from both wealth and fancy dress code so the dc for this talk down is going to suck.
>>
>>4109839
>>4110078
I'll back this, maybe with a few more Almighty's thrown in
>>
>>4109839
> “You are the law here, good knight. No one is disputing that. I have had to hang villians myself, and know the necessity of it at times. I am merely concerned that hanging them first does not give them the chance for redemption. As I am currently on a pilgrimage, and travelling with men and women of the Faith including priests, I would like to ask that in the honour of our forefathers who fought for all men that you consider a more merciful punishment. If you still insist on death for thos mans crimes, at least let him make his final confession for the good of his soul."

No way he can refuse to let a man confess before dying. And it will be interesting to see how he reacts to insisting on hanging him.
>>
>>4110078
I like this, but I think that it will come off as a challenge to his authority and honour. It's not just questioning how he is dealing with this situation, but it's an outsider who "Knows nothing, John Snow" chastising the harsh law of Fallavon. Like, y'all think other Nobles haven't criticized them for this before?

I work in O&G, I see this all the time between Cidiots and rural people.

Sinclair can't accept this criticism from some random Knight from another Duchy who isn't even the lord of the land but only a second son, repeating what his father told him but he never had to practice.

>>4108775
Is me.
>>
>>4110227
Making an appeal to a judge isnt a challenge to his authority or criticism, but a recognition of his authority.

>Sinclair can't accept this criticism from some random Knight from another Duchy who isn't even the lord of the land but only a second son, repeating what his father told him but he never had to practice.

Literally everything written here is untrue. First, Emile isn't a random knight. Sinclair knows him and fought with him during Lord Duncan's Tourney/Tournament. Second, Sir Jean Sinclair himself isn't a lord of any land and is just a third born knight. Third, Emile already practiced this multiple times in the quest like with the goat beastmen and Sir Hast Vancewell.
>>
>>4109839
> “You are the law here, good knight. No one is disputing that. Please excuse my companion’s passionate outburst.” The law is the law, even when the law is mete out harshly. Your brother knows nothing of the harsh measures necessary to maintain order out here. [Haughty]

>4109847

"However good sir, if he is to pass by your judgement, I beg you allow him a final blessing and confession as befits any condemned's last rites. I'm sure the priests traveling with us will be happy to perform them.

Supporting this write in.
>>
>>4110391
>>4109839

Yeah, this sounds like the best way to go.
>>
>>4110239
Fighting a dude in a tourney isn't really something that gives Emile the authority to call him out on following his family's policy of rule.

The write in goes too far and criticizes his policy, as opposed to this specific case.

We're not on equal ground. We're on his lands, from another duchy, we don't have a higher status in our own duchy, and we're currently doing penance so no social bonuses.

We should instead focus on the penance and appeal to the higher authority of our shared faith instead of our position as a noble and make it an issue of different views of governance.

Hopefully we can draw in Father Towbray to give the serf a penance. I mean, we're gonna face a lightning strike, no way that Sinclair could claim Towbray is soft with his penance.

If we can recontextualize the serf running away as a moral failing and not an act of rebellion against his rightful lord then there's a chance we can save him.

Undermining Sinclair's authority is probably not going to go well. I mean, it's tales of Lords that indulge their serfs that incite them to try running in the first place.
>>
>>4110078
Supporting this >Write-in
Good job on you two, perfectly captures the sentiment of the scene.
>>
>>4109839
Fuck this draconian faggot in the dickhole with the sharpest object in our possession. A knight protects the weak, this peasant is being murdered for fleeing from obvious inhuman treatment. He must be defended as our knightly vows compel us to do. Sinclair must be educated in the error of his ways in pain and blood.

>Other, challenge Sir Sinclair to a duel for the life of the peasant.
>>
>>4110486
Wait.

Don't we have a vow where we can't refuse aid or something?
>>
>>4110474
>Fighting a dude in a tourney isn't really something that gives Emile the authority to call him out on following his family's policy of rule.

An appeal of clemency isn't calling out. this is a pure strawman. Don't your put your words into other people's mouths.

>The write in goes too far and criticizes his policy, as opposed to this specific case.

You conjured this up in an attempt to make the write-in easier to attack. It's simply making an appeal. The beginning of the write-in is literally ''''Your authority isn't questioned, Sir. These are your lands and I understand how the law is enforced in Motte-Fallavon. Allow me then to appeal to your authority as the judge for clemency.''

>We're not on equal ground. We're on his lands, from another duchy, we don't have a higher status in our own duchy, and we're currently doing penance so no social bonuses.

We're not on his lands. We're at the West Fallavon roads. He isn't the Duke of Fallavon nor the lord of any land. His status is the same as us, a knight.

>Undermining Sinclair's authority is probably not going to go well. I mean, it's tales of Lords that indulge their serfs that incite them to try running in the first place.

You keep repeating that we're ''undermining'' his authority with zero basis. The write-in is an appeal to a judge. It's literally a recognition of his authority as judge.
>>
>>4109839
Do we get a situational bonus if we go with >>4110474 and focus on the penance aspect, since we're doing penance ourselves? Instead of having a penalty for diplomacy from our penance?
>>
>>4110524
>Knight's Code

>"His Blade Defends the Helpless"
+Blademaster: +10DC to Combat
-Vow: You may not strike down a defenceless or unarmed opponent.

>"His Heart Knows Only Virtue
+Holy Orders: +1 Combat Re-Roll, +1 Step on the Path of Adam
-Vow: You may not be unfaithful to your wife, nor may you sire bastards even if unmarried.

>His Might Upholds The Weak
+Staggering Blows: Opponent's suffer additional Injury(-5DC) with every point damage.
*You may refuse no call for aid, honestly asked for.

These are the knight's code vow that we have sworn.
>>
>>4110528
> Besides, what good would hanging him do? The example you'd set here will simply result in more escapees, for they have nothing to lose that would deter them. Either they flee successfully and manage to escape their service, or they fail and receive the mercy of death that would still grant them escape from their service in life. That is the example that you will set here, Sir. My lord father, may the Almighty bless him with long life, taught me that the best fortress which a lord can possess is the affection of his people, for willing obedience always beats forced obedience.

All of this immediately questions his judgement not just of the serf but of him as a lord.

Like. Did you even read it? It immediately criticizes him right after the write in has Emile say he isn't going to criticize him.

Maybe if Emile had a higher rank than him, or a reputation as a leader of men, or was in the duchy of Romaine it could work.

But in this situation it's just condescending.

> We're not on his lands.

He literally told us "All land from this crossroad to the River Yerden in the West is under the remit of House Sinclair.”

Yes. Yes we are.

> Telling him that his methods are inferior and that our Father rules so well that serfs don't want to run away in front of a runaway serf isn't undermining his authority

Yeah, because letting the serf go to tell people of a better life existing in Romaine is totally what Sinclair will let happen.
>>
>>4110552
I reread it. Luckily, the serf didn't ask for aid. Whew! Crises averted.
>>
File: 1582504155305.png (357 KB, 680x483)
357 KB
357 KB PNG
>>4110554
>All of this immediately questions his judgement not just of the serf but of him as a lord.

It seems you're not gonna stop asserting your bullshit, so I'm gonna keep correcting you. First, he isn't a lord no matter how many times you repeat it, you parrot. Second, giving reason to why he should accept the clemency appeal isn't questioning his judgment. It's very amusing how you switched the goalpost from questioning his authority to questioning his judgement.

>Like. Did you even read it? It immediately criticizes him right after the write in has Emile say he isn't going to criticize him.

Third, telling him what the other serfs will do is not criticism. It's informing him that this will not grant him the desired result that he seeks.

>Maybe if Emile had a higher rank than him, or a reputation as a leader of men, or was in the duchy of Romaine it could work.

Emile has the same rank as him and has already led men at the Battle of the King's Road.

>But in this situation it's just condescending.

Baseless assertion with zero substance.

>He literally told us "All land from this crossroad to the River Yerden in the West is under the remit of House Sinclair.”

Even if it is he isn't the lord of this land.

>Telling him that his methods are inferior and that our Father rules so well that serfs don't want to run away in front of a runaway serf isn't undermining his authority

Lel and now you're coming up with more strawman and putting it in my mouth. Simply amazing. No point in addressing your own made up words.

>Yeah, because letting the serf go to tell people of a better life existing in Romaine is totally what Sinclair will let happen.

The serfs of house Sinclair already know that there is a better life and better lords outside the Sinclair lands. That's why they ran away at the first place. They're not gonna stop fleeing to the lands of other lords till the Sinclairs start treating them better. Hanging them won't deter anything. Either they escape to better lands ruled by better rulers or they fail and get a death that gives them peace. Think before you open your mouth.
>>
>>4110078
Support
>>
>>4110524
>>4110552

>"His Blade Defends the Helpless"
+Blademaster: +10DC to Combat
-Vow: You may not strike down a defenceless or unarmed opponent.


>Strike down-
Now while this may seem to imply we never actively kill a unarmed or surrendered opponent it more likely alludes to that we are sworn to defend those who cannot defend themselves. The weak, the poor, the young, the old, those without the means to see to their own defense.

>Defenseless.

Synonyms include: Vulnerable, Helpless, Weak, Unarmed, Powerless.

Through just some slight interpretation of our Oath, which we have sworn, we are duty bound to protect this peasant from what is obviously a cruel and unjust killing.
>>
>>4110624
Okay, pal, best of luck with it then. We have a noble doing his duty as is his right and responsibility according to how it has always been done, but no all he needs is someone to straightforwardly tell him it's all wrong because that's not how his dad does it at their house.
>>
Recast Vote
This will remain open for 9-10 hours. New ids without links to previous votes will not be counted etc.

---------------------------------------------------------------
>>
(1) Fair words and common sense
> “You are the law here, good knight. No one is disputing that. Please excuse my companion’s passionate outburst.” The law is the law, even when the law is mete out harshly. Your brother knows nothing of the harsh measures necessary to maintain order out here. [Haughty] You side with Sir Sinclair and attempt to convince your brother to relent.

>"However good sir, if he is to pass by your judgement, I beg you allow him a final blessing and confession as befits any condemned's last rites. I'm sure the priests traveling with us will be happy to perform them." [Write in] + [Haughty] You side with Sir Sinclair and attempt to convince your brother to accept last rites and confession as mercy enough.

>''Your authority isn't questioned, Sir. These are your lands and I understand how the law is enforced in Fallavon. Allow me then to appeal to your authority as the judge for clemency, a hanged man can't make up for his cronies and mistakes. Besides, what good would hanging him do? The example you'd set here will simply result in more escapees, for they have nothing to lose that would deter them. Either they flee successfully and manage to escape their service, or they fail and receive the mercy of death that would still grant them escape from their service in life. That is the example that you will set here, Sir. My lord father, may the Almighty bless him with long life, taught me that the best fortress which a lord can possess is the affection of his people, for willing obedience always beats forced obedience.'' [Write in] You try not blatantly challenge Sir Sinclair’s authority, but you appeal to him as the authority for mercy. If he refuses you will attempt convince your brother to stand down.

>“The Green Knight speaks true. This is not justice.” There is a difference between the law and justice. You don’t want to challenge the skilled Sir Sinclair to prove the point. But you will if you have to, better you than your peacock brother at any rate. [Idealist] You side with your brother and will challenge Sir Sinclair to a trial by combat if necessary to spare the serfs life.

(2) Should words fail to convince either Sir Sinclair or the Green Knight you will…
>Duel Sir Sinclair yourself, you cannot allow your brother to risk his life in some foolishness after getting him out of the forest alive. Whether you take issue with Sinclair’s harshness or not is besides the point. [Haughty]

>Stand in as your brother’s second in the duel against Sir Sinclair. He is the one who has taken issue, even if combat against a fellow blademaster is ill-advised. Perhaps your brother might learn a lesson.[Hearty]

>Make no intervention action unless the serf actually asks for aid. If your brother tries to make a scene you will insist that he relents, as he owes you. Most others will have no idea what you mean, but the Green Knight will. [Idealist]
>>
>>4110710
>"However good sir, if he is to pass by your judgement, I beg you allow him a final blessing and confession as befits any condemned's last rites. I'm sure the priests traveling with us will be happy to perform them." [Write in] + [Haughty]

>Make no intervention action unless the serf actually asks for aid. If your brother tries to make a scene you will insist that he relents, as he owes you. Most others will have no idea what you mean, but the Green Knight will. [Idealist]
>>
>>4110710
(1) Fair words and common sense
>''Your authority isn't questioned, Sir. These are your lands and I understand how the law is enforced in Fallavon. Allow me then to appeal to your authority as the judge for clemency, a hanged man can't make up for his cronies and mistakes. Besides, what good would hanging him do? The example you'd set here will simply result in more escapees, for they have nothing to lose that would deter them. Either they flee successfully and manage to escape their service, or they fail and receive the mercy of death that would still grant them escape from their service in life. That is the example that you will set here, Sir. My lord father, may the Almighty bless him with long life, taught me that the best fortress which a lord can possess is the affection of his people, for willing obedience always beats forced obedience.'' [Write in]

>“The Green Knight speaks true. This is not justice.” There is a difference between the law and justice. You don’t want to challenge the skilled Sir Sinclair to prove the point. But you will if you have to, better you than your peacock brother at any rate. [Idealist]

(2) Should words fail to convince either Sir Sinclair or the Green Knight you will…
>Duel Sir Sinclair yourself, you cannot allow your brother to risk his life in some foolishness after getting him out of the forest alive. Whether you take issue with Sinclair’s harshness or not is besides the point. [Haughty]
>>
>>4110710
(1)
>"However good sir, if he is to pass by your judgement, I beg you allow him a final blessing and confession as befits any condemned's last rites. I'm sure the priests traveling with us will be happy to perform them." [Write in] + [Haughty] You side with Sir Sinclair and attempt to convince your brother to accept last rites and confession as mercy enough.

(2)
>Stand in as your brother’s second in the duel against Sir Sinclair. He is the one who has taken issue, even if combat against a fellow blademaster is ill-advised. Perhaps your brother might learn a lesson.[Hearty]

Talk shit, take the hit.
>>
>>4110710
>“The Green Knight speaks true. This is not justice.” There is a difference between the law and justice. You don’t want to challenge the skilled Sir Sinclair to prove the point. But you will if you have to, better you than your peacock brother at any rate. [Idealist]
>Duel Sir Sinclair yourself, you cannot allow your brother to risk his life in some foolishness after getting him out of the forest alive. Whether you take issue with Sinclair’s harshness or not is besides the point. [Haughty]
write in seems like a halfway option that tries to weasel out of consequences honestly, reminds me of Tracker jean write in, seems like it would just piss him off more, we're telling Sinclair he doesn't know whats best for him in more words basically.
>>
>>4110710
(1) Fair words and common sense
>''Your authority isn't questioned, Sir. These are your lands and I understand how the law is enforced in Fallavon. Allow me then to appeal to your authority as the judge for clemency, a hanged man can't make up for his cronies and mistakes. Besides, what good would hanging him do? The example you'd set here will simply result in more escapees, for they have nothing to lose that would deter them. Either they flee successfully and manage to escape their service, or they fail and receive the mercy of death that would still grant them escape from their service in life. That is the example that you will set here, Sir. My lord father, may the Almighty bless him with long life, taught me that the best fortress which a lord can possess is the affection of his people, for willing obedience always beats forced obedience.'' [Write in]

(2) Should words fail to convince either Sir Sinclair or the Green Knight you will…
>Duel Sir Sinclair yourself, you cannot allow your brother to risk his life in some foolishness after getting him out of the forest alive. Whether you take issue with Sinclair’s harshness
>>
>>4110710
>"However good sir, if he is to pass by your judgement, I beg you allow him a final blessing and confession as befits any condemned's last rites. I'm sure the priests traveling with us will be happy to perform them." [Write in] + [Haughty]

>Stand in as your brother’s second in the duel against Sir Sinclair. He is the one who has taken issue, even if combat against a fellow blademaster is ill-advised. Perhaps your brother might learn a lesson.[Hearty]

And honestly, he is the older brother and future lord, he should make his own decisions and stand by them
>>
>>4110728
> reminds me of Tracker jean write in, seems like it would just piss him off more, we're telling Sinclair he doesn't know whats best for him in more words basically.

Exactly.
>>
>>4110710
>>''Your authority isn't questioned, Sir. These are your lands and I understand how the law is enforced in Fallavon. Allow me then to appeal to your authority as the judge for clemency, a hanged man can't make up for his cronies and mistakes. Besides, what good would hanging him do? The example you'd set here will simply result in more escapees, for they have nothing to lose that would deter them. Either they flee successfully and manage to escape their service, or they fail and receive the mercy of death that would still grant them escape from their service in life. That is the example that you will set here, Sir. My lord father, may the Almighty bless him with long life, taught me that the best fortress which a lord can possess is the affection of his people, for willing obedience always beats forced obedience.'' [Write in] You try not blatantly challenge Sir Sinclair’s authority, but you appeal to him as the authority for mercy. If he refuses you will attempt convince your brother to stand down.

>Make no intervention action unless the serf actually asks for aid. If your brother tries to make a scene you will insist that he relents, as he owes you. Most others will have no idea what you mean, but the Green Knight will. [Idealist]
>>
>>4110710
>''Your authority isn't questioned, Sir. These are your lands and I understand how the law is enforced in Fallavon. Allow me then to appeal to your authority as the judge for clemency, a hanged man can't make up for his cronies and mistakes. Besides, what good would hanging him do? The example you'd set here will simply result in more escapees, for they have nothing to lose that would deter them. Either they flee successfully and manage to escape their service, or they fail and receive the mercy of death that would still grant them escape from their service in life. That is the example that you will set here, Sir. My lord father, may the Almighty bless him with long life, taught me that the best fortress which a lord can possess is the affection of his people, for willing obedience always beats forced obedience.'' [Write in]

>Stand in as your brother’s second in the duel against Sir Sinclair. He is the one who has taken issue, even if combat against a fellow blademaster is ill-advised. Perhaps your brother might learn a lesson.[Hearty]
>>
>>4110710
>>''Your authority isn't questioned, Sir. These are your lands and I understand how the law is enforced in Fallavon. Allow me then to appeal to your authority as the judge for clemency, a hanged man can't make up for his cronies and mistakes. Besides, what good would hanging him do? The example you'd set here will simply result in more escapees, for they have nothing to lose that would deter them. Either they flee successfully and manage to escape their service, or they fail and receive the mercy of death that would still grant them escape from their service in life. That is the example that you will set here, Sir. My lord father, may the Almighty bless him with long life, taught me that the best fortress which a lord can possess is the affection of his people, for willing obedience always beats forced obedience.'' [Write in]

>Make no intervention action unless the serf actually asks for aid. If your brother tries to make a scene you will insist that he relents, as he owes you. Most others will have no idea what you mean, but the Green Knight will. [Idealist]
>>
>>4110710
>(1) Fair words and common sense
>''Your authority isn't questioned, Sir. These are your lands and I understand how the law is enforced in Fallavon. Allow me then to appeal to your authority as the judge for clemency, a hanged man can't make up for his cronies and mistakes. Besides, what good would hanging him do? The example you'd set here will simply result in more escapees, for they have nothing to lose that would deter them. Either they flee successfully and manage to escape their service, or they fail and receive the mercy of death that would still grant them escape from their service in life. That is the example that you will set here, Sir. My lord father, may the Almighty bless him with long life, taught me that the best fortress which a lord can possess is the affection of his people, for willing obedience always beats forced obedience.'' [Write in]

>(2) Should words fail to convince either Sir Sinclair or the Green Knight you will…
>Duel Sir Sinclair yourself, you cannot allow your brother to risk his life in some foolishness after getting him out of the forest alive. Whether you take issue with Sinclair’s harshness or not is besides the point. [Haughty]
>>
>>4110710
(1) Fair words and common sense
>''Your authority isn't questioned, Sir. These are your lands and I understand how the law is enforced in Fallavon. Allow me then to appeal to your authority as the judge for clemency, a hanged man can't make up for his cronies and mistakes. Besides, what good would hanging him do? The example you'd set here will simply result in more escapees, for they have nothing to lose that would deter them. Either they flee successfully and manage to escape their service, or they fail and receive the mercy of death that would still grant them escape from their service in life. That is the example that you will set here, Sir. My lord father, may the Almighty bless him with long life, taught me that the best fortress which a lord can possess is the affection of his people, for willing obedience always beats forced obedience.'' [Write in]

(2) Should words fail to convince either Sir Sinclair or the Green Knight you will…
>Duel Sir Sinclair yourself, you cannot allow your brother to risk his life in some foolishness after getting him out of the forest alive. Whether you take issue with Sinclair’s harshness or not is besides the point. [Haughty]
>>
>>4110710
>>"However good sir, if he is to pass by your judgement, I beg you allow him a final blessing and confession as befits any condemned's last rites. I'm sure the priests traveling with us will be happy to perform them." [Write in] + [Haughty

>>Make no intervention action unless the serf actually asks for aid.

Should have just let him hang.

>>4108595
this is me.
>>
>>4110710
>>4110710
(1) Fair words and common sense
>''Your authority isn't questioned, Sir. These are your lands and I understand how the law is enforced in Fallavon. Allow me then to appeal to your authority as the judge for clemency, a hanged man can't make up for his cronies and mistakes. Besides, what good would hanging him do? The example you'd set here will simply result in more escapees, for they have nothing to lose that would deter them. Either they flee successfully and manage to escape their service, or they fail and receive the mercy of death that would still grant them escape from their service in life. That is the example that you will set here, Sir. My lord father, may the Almighty bless him with long life, taught me that the best fortress which a lord can possess is the affection of his people, for willing obedience always beats forced obedience.'' [Write in]

(2) Should words fail to convince either Sir Sinclair or the Green Knight you will…
>Duel Sir Sinclair yourself, you cannot allow your brother to risk his life in some foolishness after getting him out of the forest alive. Whether you take issue with Sinclair’s harshness or not is besides the point. [Haughty]

>Stand in as your brother’s second in the duel against Sir Sinclair. He is the one who has taken issue, even if combat against a fellow blademaster is ill-advised. Perhaps your brother might learn a lesson.[Hearty]
>>
>>4110710
1)
>''Your authority isn't questioned, Sir. These are your lands and I understand how the law is enforced in Fallavon. Allow me then to appeal to your authority as the judge for clemency, a hanged man can't make up for his cronies and mistakes. Besides, what good would hanging him do? The example you'd set here will simply result in more escape....


2)
>Make no intervention action unless the serf actually asks for aid. If your brother tries to make a scene you will insist that he relents, as he owes you. Most others will have no idea what you mean, but the Green Knight will. [Idealist]
>>
>>4110710
(1) Fair words and common sense
>''Your authority isn't questioned, Sir. These are your lands and I understand how the law is enforced in Fallavon. Allow me then to appeal to your authority as the judge for clemency, a hanged man can't make up for his cronies and mistakes. Besides, what good would hanging him do? The example you'd set here will simply result in more escapees, for they have nothing to lose that would deter them. Either they flee successfully and manage to escape their service, or they fail and receive the mercy of death that would still grant them escape from their service in life. That is the example that you will set here, Sir. My lord father, may the Almighty bless him with long life, taught me that the best fortress which a lord can possess is the affection of his people, for willing obedience always beats forced obedience.'' [Write in]
No reason to not to try.

(2) Should words fail to convince either Sir Sinclair or the Green Knight you will…
>Duel Sir Sinclair yourself, you cannot allow your brother to risk his life in some foolishness after getting him out of the forest alive. Whether you take issue with Sinclair’s harshness or not is besides the point. [Haughty]

>Stand in as your brother’s second in the duel against Sir Sinclair. He is the one who has taken issue, even if combat against a fellow blademaster is ill-advised. Perhaps your brother might learn a lesson.[Hearty]
>>
>>4110710
1
>Write-in

2
>Haughty

Damien has that fae-bonded sword with fae runes carved into it, right? We should ask him to let us borrow it.
>>
>>4110784
> No reason to not to try.

Except for making ANOTHER enemy in Fallavon and ruining our courtship of the Maid Sinclair..

Then again, Lady Rabe is objectively the better girl so you know. Silver linings.

Surprised nobody wanted to involve that social link with the Maid Sinclair here.
>>
>>4110710
(1)
> “You are the law here, good knight. No one is disputing that. Please excuse my companion’s passionate outburst.” The law is the law, even when the law is mete out harshly. Your brother knows nothing of the harsh measures necessary to maintain order out here. [Haughty]
(2)
>Stand in as your brother’s second in the duel against Sir Sinclair. He is the one who has taken issue, even if combat against a fellow blademaster is ill-advised. Perhaps your brother might learn a lesson.[Hearty]
and that lesson is that he needs to become more stronger
>give him temporarily the bear necklace for the fuel the bear will give him the strength
>>
>>4110710
>>''Your authority isn't questioned, Sir. These are your lands and I understand how the law is enforced in Fallavon. Allow me then to appeal to your authority as the judge for clemency, a hanged man can't make up for his cronies and mistakes. Besides, what good would hanging him do? The example you'd set here will simply result in more escapees, for they have nothing to lose that would deter them. Either they flee successfully and manage to escape their service, or they fail and receive the mercy of death that would still grant them escape from their service in life. That is the example that you will set here, Sir. My lord father, may the Almighty bless him with long life, taught me that the best fortress which a lord can possess is the affection of his people, for willing obedience always beats forced obedience.'' [Write in]
>>Stand in as your brother’s second in the duel against Sir Sinclair. He is the one who has taken issue, even if combat against a fellow blademaster is ill-advised. Perhaps your brother might learn a lesson.[Hearty]
>>
>>4110803
>give him temporarily the bear necklace for the fuel the bear will give him the strength

Good plan if it comes to blows.
>>
>>4110710
>>"However good sir, if he is to pass by your judgement, I beg you allow him a final blessing and confession as befits any condemned's last rites. I'm sure the priests traveling with us will be happy to perform them." [Write in] + [Haughty] You side with Sir Sinclair and attempt to convince your brother to accept last rites and confession as mercy enough.

>>Stand in as your brother’s second in the duel against Sir Sinclair. He is the one who has taken issue, even if combat against a fellow blademaster is ill-advised. Perhaps your brother might learn a lesson.[Hearty]
>>
>>4110710
>>"However good sir, if he is to pass by your judgement, I beg you allow him a final blessing and confession as befits any condemned's last rites. I'm sure the priests traveling with us will be happy to perform them." [Write in] + [Haughty] You side with Sir Sinclair and attempt to convince your brother to accept last rites and confession as mercy enough.

>>Stand in as your brother’s second in the duel against Sir Sinclair. He is the one who has taken issue, even if combat against a fellow blademaster is ill-advised. Perhaps your brother might learn a lesson.[Hearty]
>>
>>4110836
Backing.
>>
>>4110836
Backing.
>>
>>4110837
>>4110842
wot
>>
>>4110837
>>4110842

Is this the most obvious samefagging in the world or do you guys just not know how to vote?
>>
>>4110918
I'm sure they know that Forgotten wont take 1 ID posts votes. Might be more taking the piss that I just copy pasted the last vote here.
>>
>>4110802
>courting lady rabe
You aren't supposed to tell them the plan.
>>
>>4110969
It's more making the best of a bad situation if the vote to use French diplomacy passes.
>>
>>4110710
>>4110803
changing the first choise to; just that
>"However good sir, if he is to pass by your judgement, I beg you allow him a final blessing and confession as befits any condemned's last rites. I'm sure the priests traveling with us will be happy to perform them." [Write in] + [Haughty]
>>
>>4110710
(1)

>“The Green Knight speaks true. This is not justice.” There is a difference between the law and justice. You don’t want to challenge the skilled Sir Sinclair to prove the point. But you will if you have to, better you than your peacock brother at any rate. [Idealist]

(2) Should words fail to convince either Sir Sinclair or the Green Knight you will…

>Duel Sir Sinclair yourself, you cannot allow your brother to risk his life in some foolishness after getting him out of the forest alive. Whether you take issue with Sinclair’s harshness or not is besides the point. [Haughty]
>>
>>4110710
However good sir, if he is to pass by your judgement, I beg you allow him a final blessing and confession as befits any condemned's last rites. I'm sure the priests traveling with us will be happy to perform them." [Write in] + [Haughty]

>Stand in as your brother’s second in the duel against Sir Sinclair. He is the one who has taken issue, even if combat against a fellow blademaster is ill-advised. Perhaps your brother might learn a lesson.[Hearty]

>>4110142
This is me
>>
>>4110710
>"However good sir, if he is to pass by your judgement, I beg you allow him a final blessing and confession as befits any condemned's last rites. I'm sure the priests traveling with us will be happy to perform them." [Write in] + [Haughty] You side with Sir Sinclair and attempt to convince your brother to accept last rites and confession as mercy enough.
>Stand in as your brother’s second in the duel against Sir Sinclair. He is the one who has taken issue, even if combat against a fellow blademaster is ill-advised. Perhaps your brother might learn a lesson.[Hearty]
>>
>>4110710
1)
>''Your authority isn't questioned, Sir. These are your lands and I understand how the law is enforced in Fallavon. Allow me then to appeal to your authority as the judge for clemency, a hanged man can't make up for his cronies and mistakes. Besides, what good would hanging him do? The example you'd set here will simply result in more escapees, for they have nothing to lose that would deter them. Either they flee successfully and manage to escape their service, or they fail and receive the mercy of death that would still grant them escape from their service in life. That is the example that you will set here, Sir. My lord father, may the Almighty bless him with long life, taught me that the best fortress which a lord can possess is the affection of his people, for willing obedience always beats forced obedience.'' [Write in]

2)
>Stand in as your brother’s second in the duel against Sir Sinclair. He is the one who has taken issue, even if combat against a fellow blademaster is ill-advised. Perhaps your brother might learn a lesson.[Hearty]
>>
>>4110710

>''Your authority isn't questioned, Sir. These are your lands and I understand how the law is enforced in Fallavon. Allow me then to appeal to your authority as the judge for clemency, a hanged man can't make up for his cronies and mistakes. Besides, what good would hanging him do? The example you'd set here will simply result in more escapees, for they have nothing to lose that would deter them. Either they flee successfully and manage to escape their service, or they fail and receive the mercy of death that would still grant them escape from their service in life. That is the example that you will set here, Sir. My lord father, may the Almighty bless him with long life, taught me that the best fortress which a lord can possess is the affection of his people, for willing obedience always beats forced obedience.'' [Write in]

>Duel Sir Sinclair yourself, you cannot allow your brother to risk his life in some foolishness after getting him out of the forest alive. Whether you take issue with Sinclair’s harshness or not is besides the point. [Haughty]
>>
File: Hanging Tree 2.png (278 KB, 390x260)
278 KB
278 KB PNG
Discounting low-count IDs without links. A failure to convince Sir Jean Sinclair will require a further roll to ensure the Green Knight doesn’t insist on a trial by combat. FYI, even with the bear totem and fae blade Damien stands a poor chance against a skilled opponent like Sir Sinclair. While the write-in isn’t bad per se, I do think it misreads the target of the persuaion. House Sinclair, as it has been said before, rules this fief of West Fallavon with sharp blade and iron fist. As such, no bonus shall be awarded but no negatives will be inflicted either.

1)
>''Your authority isn't questioned, Sir. These are your lands and I understand how the law is enforced in Fallavon. Allow me then to appeal to your authority as the judge for clemency, a hanged man can't make up for his cronies and mistakes. Besides, what good would hanging him do? The example you'd set here will simply result in more escapees, for they have nothing to lose that would deter them. Either they flee successfully and manage to escape their service, or they fail and receive the mercy of death that would still grant them escape from their service in life. That is the example that you will set here, Sir. My lord father, may the Almighty bless him with long life, taught me that the best fortress which a lord can possess is the affection of his people, for willing obedience always beats forced obedience.'' [Write in]

2)
>Stand in as your brother’s second in the duel against Sir Sinclair. He is the one who has taken issue, even if combat against a fellow blademaster is ill-advised. Perhaps your brother might learn a lesson.[Hearty]

------------------------------------------------------------------

Persuade Roll
>Unreasonable Request / Equal Social Standing 30DC
> Write-in +0
>Wealth +0 (Penury)
>Attire +0 (Penury)
>Sir Sinclair Military Tabard -5DC, +1 Adverse Re-Roll
> 25DC

0 = Sir Jean Sinclair is personally affronted by the presumption in your ‘holier than thou’ lecture. He goads the Green Knight into stopping him, if he has the courage to try. (Duel inevitable)
1 = Sir Jean Sinclair discards your unwelcome advice out of hand, but at least you don’t seem to have personally offended him. There will be no clemency without intervention. (Duel hard to avoid)
2 = Sir Jean Sinclair is unmoved by your arguments, but he does take the time to patiently explain his position and the reasons for his insistence in carrying out the decreed sentence. (Duel moderately avoidable)
3 = Sir Jean Sinclair thinks you must be a soft lot in Romaine, but a bit of clemency for one measly peasant is a small concession at the request of a fellow warrior who has proven himself. He also has news for you regarding the Rabes. (Duel avoided)


3 rolls of 1d100. Your opponent has 1 re-roll.


Let calm heads prevail
>>
Rolled 40 (1d100)

>>4111771
>>
Rolled 87 (1d100)

>>4111771
>>
Rolled 11 (1d100)

>>4111771
>>
>>4111776
Nice. Does the double affect anything here? If I remember right doubles can't be re-rolled.
>>
Hahaha.

No more red haired waifu then.
>>
>>4111776
A double, so I can't use the re-roll. 1 success it is. I'll be back in an hour with a roll to convince your brother, new rollers etc.
>>
and we worked so hard to make sure the powers that be were not going to do our brother harm and now this.
>>
>>4110182
told ya
>>
>>4111779
Oh well. It was good to try and no harm came out of it.

>>4111778
No we got 1 success
>1 = Sir Jean Sinclair discards your unwelcome advice out of hand, but at least you don’t seem to have personally offended him. There will be no clemency without intervention. (Duel hard to avoid)

He doesn't accept the appeal but it doesn't affect our relations with him or house Sinclair.
>>
>>4111771
Man no wonder the Bluejays are strongest at these lands when you have retards like the Sinclair Sheriff of Nottingham here. Hanging won't deter mistreated serfs from running away.
>>
If the peasant explicitely asks for help at one point, though, we have to intervene personally in order not to break our vow.
>>
>>4111788
Yeah it was still worth trying and the fail result wasn't bad. Too bad that logic is ineffective against Jean Sinclair though.
>>
>>4111788
If our brother gets injured or even dies because we didn't intercede what then?
>>
>>4111807
I voted to duel him ourselves in case the appeal didn't succeed.
>>
Who could have possibly foreseen this turn of events?
>>
>>4111772
>>4111775
>>4111776
Good try lads. No success but no bad consequences either.
>>
>>4111772
>>4111775
>>4111776

>1 Success
>Sir Jean Sinclair discards your unwelcome advice out of hand, but at least you don’t seem to have personally offended him. There will be no clemency without intervention. (Duel hard to avoid)
As you are standing in as his second, this roll will also reflect how he approaches the duel itself, should it happen.

Persuade Roll
>Unreasonable Request / Lower Social Standing 20DC
>Wealth +0 (Penury)
>Attire +0 (Penury)
>Companion-for-Life +20DC, +1 Re-Roll
> 40DC

Double Fail = A personal feud with Sinclair.
0 = Your appeal to Damien’s sense of reason achieves little. In his eyes, Sir Sinclair is the epitome of everything wrong with the feudal system. He will fight, and possibly not yield even when seriously outmatched.
1 = Damien is not deterred from insisting on a trial by combat. But he at least will not fight to the death and put all your efforts in keeping him safe to naught.
2 = Damien listens to you. He believes that you are allowing a flagrant injustice to be committed and he may hold it against you for some time. But he relents.
3 = Calmer heads prevail. Damien understands your position, and he remembers that he is indebted to you. He has nothing nice to say about the brutal Sinclair, but none of that animosity is directed at you.
Double Pass = Sound advice for the duel.


3 rolls of 1d100. You have 1 Re-Roll. NEW ROLLERS PLEASE.

Stop your brother before he does something stupid.
>>
>>4111809
no one obviously who could have thought that talking with words a knight JUDGE (judge dredd) was futile I AM THE LAW I don't give a shit about your words word's words >>4110196
>>
Rolled 39 (1d100)

>>4111811
ere we go
>>
Rolled 88 (1d100)

>>4111811
don't get kill please
>>
Rolled 35 (1d100)

>>4111808
my point was less an attack and more that the relations are going to be fucked either way if the duel breaks out.

>>4111811
ROLLAN
>>
Rolled 56 (1d100)

>>4111811
>>
>>4111814
>Double Fail = A personal feud with Sinclair.

Ayup.

There we go.
>>
>>4111814
>Double fail

wew lad
>>
File: 1582863642843.jpg (131 KB, 525x809)
131 KB
131 KB JPG
>>4111814
talk shit get hit sheeeet
>>
I told you this will blow up in our face. Maybe you'll learn that words words write-ins don't always work, anons
>>
File: nice.png (153 KB, 322x473)
153 KB
153 KB PNG
>>4111812
>>4111814
Once again, WHO COULD HAVE POSSIBLY FORESEEN THIS?
Good effort, lad.

Should have just let him hang.
>>
>>4111822
This has nothing to do with the write-in though. This is because we chose to let Damien with hearty instead of dueling him ourselves.
>>
File: Fuck Fallavon.jpg (75 KB, 720x663)
75 KB
75 KB JPG
>Pissed of the Marquis
>Pissed of Vancewell
>Pissed off Bluejays
>Pissed off Sinclairs

Man fucking Fallavon
>>
>>4111827
I know right

Fuck. The only folks we have not pissed off are the fucking FAE.
>>
>>4111827
fuck lets become buds with the dragon
>>
Doesn't this mean DAMIEN has a feud with Sinclair though?
>>
>>4111831
Does it matter? If Damien has a feud with the Sinclairs, then any Andrei getting chummy with them will be frowned upon, at the least.
>>
Well so much for this>>4109937
I guess Emile Ian a righteous man and is just a hypocrite who doesn't practice what he preaches. Why the fuck did we roll to convince Damien out of the duel when hearty explicitly says we let him duel anyway?
>>
>>4111828
even then damn near anything that has anyplace in their world is gonna try and kill us on a bad day at least if not every other day.

>>4111829
>Go to Carthaggi
>Piss off the Dragon before we even step foot in the city.
>>
>>4111811
Uuh, I don't really understand this roll. Why would we roll to stop Damien from duelling while we explicitely voted to stand besides him for a duel against Sinclair ? Makes no sense. We voted to support Damien in this duel.
>>
>>4111840
Forgotten sticked convincing Damien out of the duel in the write-in for no reason. Neither the write-in nor the two anons who came up with it stated they want to persuade Damien if the appeal failed.
>>
>>4111843
Yup, I think Forgotten made a mistake here.
>>
>>4111842
>>4111843
>>4111846
It's implied in the post
>(2) Should words fail to convince either Sir Sinclair or the Green Knight you will…
>or the Green Knight
>>
>>4111811
Wait why the fuck did we roll for this shit? Neither the writein nor hearty entail trying to stop Damien. Hearty literally says stand with your brother as his second. The choices that wanted to stop Damien didn't win.
>>
>>4111848
That's something Forgotten himself made up. No where in the write-in does it say stop Damien.
>>
>>4111850
>>4111848
>>4111846
>>4111843

>''Your authority isn't questioned, Sir. These are your lands and I understand how the law is enforced in Fallavon. Allow me then to appeal to your authority as the judge for clemency, a hanged man can't make up for his cronies and mistakes. Besides, what good would hanging him do? The example you'd set here will simply result in more escapees, for they have nothing to lose that would deter them. Either they flee successfully and manage to escape their service, or they fail and receive the mercy of death that would still grant them escape from their service in life. That is the example that you will set here, Sir. My lord father, may the Almighty bless him with long life, taught me that the best fortress which a lord can possess is the affection of his people, for willing obedience always beats forced obedience.'' [Write in] You try not blatantly challenge Sir Sinclair’s authority, but you appeal to him as the authority for mercy. If he refuses you will attempt convince your brother to stand down.

I made it perfectly clear in the recast with spoiler explanations. >>4110710
>>
File: Sir Andrei the Bear.png (3.25 MB, 1592x2536)
3.25 MB
3.25 MB PNG
>2 Success
>Damien listens to you. He believes that you are allowing a flagrant injustice to be committed and he may hold it against you for some time. But he relents.
>Double Fail
>Damien Andrei and Jean Sinclair have an ongoing rivalry with one another, and not a friendly one.


“Your authority isn't questioned, Sir. These are your lands and I understand how the law is enforced in Fallavon. Allow me then to appeal to your authority as the judge for clemency, a hanged man can't make up for his cronies and mistakes.” You do your level best to keep your tone as respectful as possible, but you can see that your plea is falling on deaf ears. “Besides, what good would hanging him do? The example you'd set here will simply result in more escapees, for they have nothing to lose that would deter them. Either they flee successfully and manage to escape their service, or they fail and receive the mercy of death that would still grant them escape from their service in life. That is the example that you will set here, Sir. My lord father, may the Almighty bless him with long life, taught me that the best fortress which a lord can possess is the affection of his people, for willing obedience always beats forced obedience.''

“I’m in no mood for a lecture, Sir Andrei. Sir Jean Sinclair scoffs, though he sounds bored rather than insulted as he waves to his men-at-arms standing by. “String the criminal up. And not too fast either, we wouldn’t want to snap his neck.”

“You pit-damned barbarian…” The Green Knight growls, edging his steed forwards.

“What did you say?” The Fallavon knight’s expression is entirely changed, a cool lethal attention on this mystery knight.

[1/2]
>>
File: Peasant serf.jpg (211 KB, 629x475)
211 KB
211 KB JPG
[2/2]

“Don’t do this, brother.” You hiss softly, grabbing the Green Knight’s forearm. Louder you say. “This is not our land, not our customs. Do not seek a quarrel over an issue that does not concern us.”

“You’re just going to let them hang the poor man?” Damien hisses back, plucking his arm from your clutch. “Like a Cathagi Master would a runaway slave?”

“Brother, please.” You whisper in a low voice, soft enough for the others not to hear. “My mission is to see you safely home. Don’t make that more difficult than it has to be.”

Damien tenses, his hands curling into fists. Then they relax. His head sinks, a defeated nod. “Damn you, Em. Damn it all.”

The Green Knight turns his mount away, seeking to be alone for now. The runaway serf, perhaps seeing his last chance at salvation snatched away begins sobbing uncontrollably as the Sinclair men-at-arms tie his hand and droop the noose over his neck. “No, please! You can’t let them do this! Almighty have mercy, Sirs, for pity’s sake! Help me!”

===================================

>“Pit. Fucking. Damn it. *sigh* Sir Sinclair, I am afraid I must insist on a duel after all. With me.” You don’t give a damn about the bloody serf, but you must live up to the Knight’s Code. Even when you would rather do anything but. [Haughty]

>“Fine. Fine! Reginae wept, go have your duel Green Knight. Just don’t get yourself killed.” A trial by combat is a rustic version of justice, but it is better than no trial at all. And at least your brother won’t endanger himself. Too much. [Hearty]

>“Sir Sinclair, if you would indulge me. Allow our priest to speak a few words over the poor man.” The man’s life is forfeit, as dictated by law. He is a condemned criminal and the code was not meant to apply to such. But perhaps his soul can still be saved. [Idealist]
>>
>>4111859
>>“Sir Sinclair, if you would indulge me. Allow our priest to speak a few words over the poor man.” The man’s life is forfeit, as dictated by law. He is a condemned criminal and the code was not meant to apply to such. But perhaps his soul can still be saved. [Idealist]

I want out.

I want out of this fucking greenery.
>>
>>4111859
>>“Pit. Fucking. Damn it. *sigh* Sir Sinclair, I am afraid I must insist on a duel after all. With me.” You don’t give a damn about the bloody serf, but you must live up to the Knight’s Code. Even when you would rather do anything but. [Haughty]


AHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH FUCK FALLAVON
>>
>>4111852
That spoiler is something you added yourself Forgotten. I never wrote in the write-in to stop Damien if it failed.
>>
>>4111859
>“Sir Sinclair, if you would indulge me. Allow our priest to speak a few words over the poor man.” The man’s life is forfeit, as dictated by law. He is a condemned criminal and the code was not meant to apply to such. But perhaps his soul can still be saved. [Idealist]
>>
>>4111859
>“Pit. Fucking. Damn it. *sigh* Sir Sinclair, I am afraid I must insist on a duel after all. With me.” You don’t give a damn about the bloody serf, but you must live up to the Knight’s Code. Even when you would rather do anything but. [Haughty]
>>
>>4111859
>“Fine. Fine! Reginae wept, go have your duel Green Knight. Just don’t get yourself killed.” A trial by combat is a rustic version of justice, but it is better than no trial at all. And at least your brother won’t endanger himself. Too much. [Hearty]
a lesson needs to be learn a that's you need to become stronger brother
>>
>>4111859
>>“Sir Sinclair, if you would indulge me. Allow our priest to speak a few words over the poor man.” The man’s life is forfeit, as dictated by law. He is a condemned criminal and the code was not meant to apply to such. But perhaps his soul can still be saved. [Idealist]
>>
>>4111859
Dont like how haughty is worded but gotta help him now.
>>
>>4111859
>Fine. Fine! Reginae wept, go have your duel Green Knight. Just don’t get yourself killed.” A trial by combat is a rustic version of justice, but it is better than no trial at all. And at least your brother won’t endanger himself. Too much. [Hearty]
We should honestly send a letter to our parents with Damien
>>
>>4111859
>“Pit. Fucking. Damn it. *sigh* Sir Sinclair, I am afraid I must insist on a duel after all. With me.” You don’t give a damn about the bloody serf, but you must live up to the Knight’s Code. Even when you would rather do anything but. [Haughty]
>>
>>4111859
>>4111859
>“Pit. Fucking. Damn it. *sigh* Sir Sinclair, I am afraid I must insist on a duel after all. With me.” You don’t give a damn about the bloody serf, but you must live up to the Knight’s Code. Even when you would rather do anything but. [Haughty]


He has requested our aid now.
>>
>>4111852
Oh ok, I had not seen the spoiler. It wasn't something specified in the write-in that we voted for, though. So yeah, I'm still kinda "meh" about this roll. Doesn't really reflect our decision in my opinion but heh, that's ok, never mind.
>>
>>4111871
Ahh piss the Knight code is in effect
>>
>>4111859
>>“Pit. Fucking. Damn it. *sigh* Sir Sinclair, I am afraid I must insist on a duel after all. With me.” You don’t give a damn about the bloody serf, but you must live up to the Knight’s Code. Even when you would rather do anything but. [Haughty]

Well, now that the peasant asked for help directly, things are changed. I initially supported the decision to let Damien duel Sinclair but now we have to intervene since it is part our vow to help anyone who's asking for it.
>>
>>4111859
>“Pit. Fucking. Damn it. *sigh* Sir Sinclair, I am afraid I must insist on a duel after all. With me.” You don’t give a damn about the bloody serf, but you must live up to the Knight’s Code. Even when you would rather do anything but. [Haughty]


>His Might Upholds The Weak
+Staggering Blows: Opponent's suffer additional Injury(-5DC) with every point damage.
*You may refuse no call for aid, honestly asked for.
>>
>>4111875
Though, I don't want to kill Sinclair. Let's not be too lethal in our strikes. We embody the shield of justice, not the executioner's blade.
>>
>>4111877
If he goes for the kill I don't think that'll be an option.
>>
>>4111859
>“Pit. Fucking. Damn it. *sigh* Sir Sinclair, I am afraid I must insist on a duel after all. With me.” You don’t give a damn about the bloody serf, but you must live up to the Knight’s Code. Even when you would rather do anything but. [Haughty]

>“No, please! You can’t let them do this! Almighty have mercy, Sirs, for pity’s sake! Help me!”

Guys going with one of the other two choices means breaking our knight's code vow.
>>
>>4111875
>He is a condemned criminal and the code was not meant to apply to such
well.....a criminal for a stupid reason but still
>>
4gotten, does the knight's code apply for condemned prisoners?
>>
>>4111875
>>4111876

I believe that should come with caveats. This is a legal punishment which is happening. Does this mean that if a murderer who was going to be executed cried for help and we have to intervene against guards?

If it actually applied, forgotten would have mentioned. Just like he did right at the start against sir vancewell. Where he said we could outright attack him since he technically was not unarmed.
>>
>>4111881
Nowhere in the code is it stated that we're forbidden to help a criminal. In my opinion, it implies that it is sometimes justified for a knight to stand against the law if the law is unfair. Of course, this notion is highly subjective and as such, one knight could think that a law is perfectly fair while another would think it is unfair. That's up to our own morality. A knight helping a so-called "criminal" because he genuinely thinks that the law condemning him is morally wrong does not breaks his code, in my opinion.
>>
>>4111883
>Does this mean that if a murderer who was going to be executed cried for help and we have to intervene against guards?

Due to the fact their is not a metric for what is an appropriate response for our knightly vow help could simply be making the punishment as painless as possible.

but due to the Idealism Emille posseses I'd say a more wholesale effort for such a individual would be more appropriate.
>>
>>4111862
Fair. I suppose I could have reworded the second choice to reflect the options of duel/convince-not-to-duel more clearly.

But I have done nothing underhanded here.
>>
we assume he is innocent we think him no criminal just as we cannot tell a lie if we are personally convinced of a false statement so too we can not refuse a call to aid if we think the peasant innocent
>>
>>4111859
>>“Pit. Fucking. Damn it. *sigh* Sir Sinclair, I am afraid I must insist on a duel after all. With me.” You don’t give a damn about the bloody serf, but you must live up to the Knight’s Code. Even when you would rather do anything but. [Haughty]
>>
>>4111886
>>4111883
>>4111882

As you say, it is highly subjective.
>>
>>4111859
>“Pit. Fucking. Damn it. *sigh* Sir Sinclair, I am afraid I must insist on a duel after all. With me.” You don’t give a damn about the bloody serf, but you must live up to the Knight’s Code. Even when you would rather do anything but. [Haughty]

Time to borrow our brother's fae bonded blade with fae runes.
>>
>>4111889
But we clearly do not see him as innocent. Emile still has the haughty trait and while he might view the punishment as excessive, he has already come across in the story posts as not questioning his guilt. Only the severity of the punishment.
>>
>>4111894
yeah your right switching too idealist
>>4111890
>“Sir Sinclair, if you would indulge me. Allow our priest to speak a few words over the poor man.” The man’s life is forfeit, as dictated by law. He is a condemned criminal and the code was not meant to apply to such. But perhaps his soul can still be saved. [Idealist]
>>
>>4111859
>“Pit. Fucking. Damn it. *sigh* Sir Sinclair, I am afraid I must insist on a duel after all. With me.” You don’t give a damn about the bloody serf, but you must live up to the Knight’s Code. Even when you would rather do anything but. [Haughty]

Letting Damien and him duel now would be a terrible idea as they now have a personal feud.
>>
>>4111859
>“Sir Sinclair, if you would indulge me. Allow our priest to speak a few words over the poor man.” The man’s life is forfeit, as dictated by law. He is a condemned criminal and the code was not meant to apply to such. But perhaps his soul can still be saved. [Idealist]
>>
>>4111886
Just join the Jays already. The Serf knew the penalties for fleeing, and imthe death of one now could prevent the deaths of many later who think they too can get special treatment.
>>
>>4111894
There is quite a difference between being Haughty and thinking that a peasant, whose only crime is an attempt to flee a country because he can't survive anymore due to taxes or anything else, deserves to die a long and painful death (death by hanging, if your neck is not broken instantly, is an atrocious agony that can last more than 10 minutes).

That's not being Haughty. But perhaps you want to roleplay Jeoffrey Lannister, although that roleplay would be completely incoherent due to our previous actions with the Bluejays or the way we save beastfolks (which should be way worst than helping a poor peasant about to die in a horrible way for such a trivial reason).
>>
>>4111904
>Not wanting a peasant to die a horrible death because he broke a totally unfair law.
>"Just join the Bluejays"

Yeah, right, it seems I'm not talking to the brightest fellow here.
>>
>>4111905
I think your applying modern morality and freedom of travel as a right that doesn't apply here.

The serf has broken his fealty to his lord, it's not just about his life. We're able to at least allow him to die with his soul unburdened.
>>
>>4111881
>>4111882
>>4111883
The difference between aiding a convicted murderer and this is the justice of the law. He's a criminal runaway serf that is going to be hanged slowly because he tried to run away from cruel mistreatment. That is completely unjust. The Law of Adam didn't see the law of the Cathagi as just. Interfering with the conviction of a clearly guilty and convicted malicious murderer would be a completely different matter. The requirement to answer the call for aid is that it must be honestly asked for. A convicted murderer won't honestly ask for it.

>>4111886
This.

>>4111894
Emile is haughty but definitely not to the point he'd consider hanging a runaway serf to be just let alone care about whether he's innocent of the innocuous crime. Don't forget that Emile saved that peasant kid from being mutilated by those noble kids at Aubrey.

>>4111887
>appropriate response for our knightly vow help could simply be making the punishment as painless as possible.

That would be untrue in this case. His call for aid is to save him. He's not calling for aid to make the punishment as painless as possible. That would be the worst attempt to circumvent a vow and pretending you didn't break it thus far.
>>
>>4111908
He requested our aid to save him. He didn't request aid to let him have a final confession before they hang him slowly. Refusing would be a clear breaking of our vow.
>>
>>4111904
>and imthe death of one now could prevent the deaths of many later who think they too can get special treatment.

This will absolutely not prevent the death of more later. The Sinclairs clearly treat their serfs cruelly and harshly. Many more will try to escape to the lands of other lords or die in the attempt. Hanging one here won't deter them from it.
>>
>>4111888
Forgotten can I ask what did you mean by stating that Damien and Jean have a personal feud now? Damien is the Green Knight right now. Jean doesn't know who he is. Does it mean that Jean has a personal feud with the Green Knight and Damien has a personal feud with Jean?
>>
>>4111909
>Emile is haughty but definitely not to the point he'd consider hanging a runaway serf to be just let alone care about whether he's innocent of the innocuous crime. Don't forget that Emile saved that peasant kid from being mutilated by those noble kids at Aubrey.

Exactly. This only should be enough to justify the decision to help the serf, or else we'd play a completely incoherent character who's roleplay change every day. If you want to play the archetype of Lawful Neutral knight who applies the law blindly without any regard for morality, then perhaps you skipped 90% of our previous decisions in the quest because we did the exact opposite most of the time.
>>
>>4111906
That's literally the reasoning of the Bluejays. The law isn't necessarily "unfair", Sir Sinclair has the right to enact the letter of the law. If Serfs are allowed to flee en mass, then surrounding countys will be burdened with refugees whilst the county they fled falls apart.

Should the serfs in surrounding counties then flee in turn? Should the burden of enacting justice fall upon the surrounding lords and force them to put the serfs to the sword? What if they gather and form a band of rebels?

If your argument is that the law itself is unjust, then yeah you might as well join the Jays because you're undermining feudalism

Also

> goes right to insults

Classy.
>>
>>4111911
Forgotten specifically said it was open to interpretation, so no it wouldn't consist of breaking our vow.

You might want to believe it, but Word of God says otherwise.

>>4111916
Hey, I'm not the one you have to convince, I grew up in a Western nation. It's the Courts of Canton. Good luck with that, expect more of how Sir Sinclair responded.
>>
>>4111909
I was more addressing the hypothetical in the above post but his word for word plea was for help there was no specific wording as to how that should manifest, you are correct that the spirit of the plea is to help him from dying but he's actual plea for his life is not actually there and to plea with ''You can’t let them do this! Allmighty have mercy'' can be construed as either a quick death or full clemency with us standing as his defendant.

weither Emille chooses to actually address the technical nature surrounding his pleas or to do as I think he should and address the spirit of his pleas is another thing entirely
>>
>>4111921
What you're doing isn't interpretation but mental gymnastics. The vow is thus:
>*You may refuse no call for aid, honestly asked for.

He called for aid to SAVE him.
> “No, please! You can’t let them do this! Almighty have mercy, Sirs, for pity’s sake! Help me!”

There is absolutely no way you can interpret this as him not wanting to be saved and instead just wants to confession or a painless death. Not aiding him would be a clear breaking of the vow. You're trying to break it and pretend at the same time that it won't be breaking the vow.

>Hey, I'm not the one you have to convince, I grew up in a Western nation. It's the Courts of Canton. Good luck with that, expect more of how Sir Sinclair responded.

Forgotten has already stated that the Sinclair's way of meting out the law is draconian even by the standards of Fallavon. The Courts of Canton are absolutely not like this. Not even the rest of Fallavon is this draconian.
>>
Mental gymnastics. The serf had it coming and he's getting it
>>
>>4111916
>Many more will try to escape to the lands of other lords
oh naive child I'm pretty sure they just join the bluejay at this point you know, they peasants probably think everyone is like them and obviously the Sinclair is trying to execute him to avoid more people joining them but those fools are literally doing the opposite obviously assuming I am correct
>>
>>4111926
All criminals beg to be saved from the consequences of their actions.

Forgotten outright said it was open to interpretation if the oath applied, so stop claiming it has to be followed even for criminals.
>>
>>4111935
I was trying to explain the ethical reasoning behind serf laws, but yeah specifically in Fallavon it's another bow in the woods and the lives the runaway takes after turning to banditry would be on our hands.
>>
>>4111936
Don't make shit up please, you mental gymnast. No where did Forgotten say it's ''open to interpretation''. He said that it's highly subjective. That doesn't mean refusing to aid him right after he called us to save him won't be breaking the vow. He is calling for aid. He isn't calling for a few more words before they hang him.

>>4111935
My point still stands whether they flee to other lands or to the Bluejays. This won't deter more Sinclair serfs from escaping. The Sinclairs are troglodytes and no one should be surprised that some of their serfs become Bluejays.
>>
>>4111891
>>4111942
Sorry, it was that "it is highly subjective".

Same meaning. You can project your mental gymnastics on others all you want, but your argument is bad and you should feel bad about it.

> The Sinclairs are troglodytes and no one should be surprised that some of their serfs become Bluejays.

Wow. Goin' full Bluejay. Called it.
>>
>>4111942
Also

> Thinks saving a mans life is worth more than saving his soul.

Just what I would expect from a Bluejay. Probably refuses to even admit his sins, much less confess them.
>>
>>4111942
>The Sinclairs are troglodytes and no one should be surprised that some of their serfs become Bluejays
That is a lot of assumptions from just one scene, it's a shame we didn't get Sinclair's explanation from 2 passes
>>
>>4111920
>That's literally the reasoning of the Bluejays.
No, it's the reasoning of Adam and Cain. They weren't legalistic imbeciles who bowed down to the unjust laws of the Cathagi and allowed the slaves and their mother to be tormented. Emile and literally every other Cantonian noble are the descendant of Cathagi runaway slaves who joined Adam and Cain in their departure to Canton.

>>4111946
I don't care about what you think on my argument, you mental gymnast. You are absolutely delusional if you think refusing to aid him and instead giving him just a confession before hanging him means that we have kept to the vow. He is requesting aid to save his life and refusing to aid him means we didn't follow on it and just tried to shirk it.

>>4111947
Saving his soul my ass. You don't want to save his soul and don't give a flying fuck about what happens to him. You just don't want to save him. Be honest about it.

>>4111951
He already explained it to us. He's hanging him because he's a runaway serf and thinks it will deter the rest of their mistreated serfs from fleeing. He's also a petty vicious cunt who ordered his men to make the hanging of the serf slow and painful just to spite Damien. Fuck him.
>>
>>4111956
>He's also a petty vicious cunt who ordered his men to make the hanging of the serf slow and painful just to spite Damien. Fuck him.

Yeah, that was dishonourable and completely uncalled for. What a cretin. I hope Damien BTFOs him in the Spring Tournament.
>>
>>4111962
>Damien stands a poor chance against a skilled opponent like Sir Sinclair
heh
>>
>>4111859
>>“Sir Sinclair, if you would indulge me. Allow our priest to speak a few words over the poor man.” The man’s life is forfeit, as dictated by law. He is a condemned criminal and the code was not meant to apply to such. But perhaps his soul can still be saved. [Idealist]
he is a criminal ish
>>
>>4111972
Which doesn't make sense to me since Damien himself is a great warrior from what we saw at the ruins. Having blademaster should give an advantage but not to the point where you're the favored one. Marquis Caspian Fallavon rekt the twat at Lord Duncan's Tourney so he definitely should be bellow his level at least. Anyway there's still plenty of time for Damien to improve his skills and get better equipment.
>>
>>4111976
>Damian has 15 DC
>Sinclair has 22 DC as a companion he probably has more thing hidden
>comparing the fucking 45 DC of Caspian fallavon with anything
everyone can lost again him my frend
>>
>>4111956
> You mental gymnast

About all the argument you can come up with. It's funny, I wrote in about letting him confess because even criminals are granted the right for redemption.

But you seem to be unable to discern justice from wanting to be a big naive hero and damn the laws or what they represent because you don't have the guts to follow through.

It's funny that you try to work Adam and Caine into it, while disparaging that they fought for the dignity of mens souls and killed plenty of men. Also ignoring that they died and left so the Regina was the one who set up the system. Also that the Church is present in Fallavon, and doesn't prevent serfdom. So it's not really appropriate to try and use them to argue against it.

So keep calling me names and freaking out, just admit you don't actually care about Justice and don't have the stones to follow through even when it requires a firm hand.

Honestly this could have gone a lot better if the write-in hadn't so badly misread the situation. I suspect Forgotten felt bad about the 25DC.

We could intervene to have the man get a clean death with a clean soul, or we could faff about and metaphorically wank off about how superior we are that we are above the law.

Deciding that his Oath applies to a convicted and guilty criminal, just like it did with those Beastmen we hung ourselves and defended hanging them to Craven, fits in perfectly with Haughty and not Idealistic.

But giving the criminal confession is idealistic.

Interesting how you're accusing me of not caring about the serf, but you haven't even thought about what happens after we leave. What are we going to do, kidnap the serf? I'm sure he'll have a fantastic time once we're gone.
>>
>>4111859
>“Pit. Fucking. Damn it. *sigh* Sir Sinclair, I am afraid I must insist on a duel after all. With me.” You don’t give a damn about the bloody serf, but you must live up to the Knight’s Code. Even when you would rather do anything but. [Haughty]
>>
>>4111976
>Go through fuckthatshit.avi to save our Brother from being strung up by the Queensmen
>he gets killed because he decides to pick a fight with a ruthless cunt of a knight instead of us interceding on his behalf

the utility of our life in exchange for the future of our houses heir aside we went through to much bullshit to have him risk his life in some roadside duel.
>>
>>4111859
Good morning and . . . Huh. Here we are then.

>“Fine. Fine! Reginae wept, go have your duel Green Knight. Just don’t get yourself killed.” A trial by combat is a rustic version of justice, but it is better than no trial at all. And at least your brother won’t endanger himself. Too much. [Hearty]

A loss will be good for our brother's high estimation of himself.

When he loses, can we still ask for the serf to be allowed to confess?
>>
>>4111956
> MFW the idealist option is the only one that mentions giving a damn about the serf, and it lets him hang.
>>
>>4111986
There is no justice here, you mental gymnast. Jean Sinclair is a powertripping faggot who thinks he can terrorize his house's serfs into not fleeing by making an example of one of them. He clearly doesn't give even a tiny atom of a damn about justice. What the retard doesn't understand is that their mistreated serfs having nothing to lose. They won't stop fleeing to other lands or joining Bluejays till start treating them decently.

>It's funny that you try to work Adam and Caine into it, while disparaging that they fought for the dignity of mens souls and killed plenty of men. Also ignoring that they died and left so the Regina was the one who set up the system. Also that the Church is present in Fallavon, and doesn't prevent serfdom. So it's not really appropriate to try and use them to argue against it.

Is this supposed to make my point less valid or something? The Church isn't Salve Regina, Adam, or Cain. They fought for the dignity of their fellow slaves. Cain sure as shit didn't give a damn about the dignity of human slavers from what we read about him. Point still stands that they weren't legalistic retards and knew that unjust laws must be opposed. Also, no where is it ever stated that Slave Regina had anything to do with setting up the system. That is 100% something you pulled out of your hole.

>Honestly this could have gone a lot better if the write-in hadn't so badly misread the situation. I suspect Forgotten felt bad about the 25DC.

This situation has nothing to do with the write-in. No where was it written or stated by me or the other anon that we should stop Damien if the appeal failed. That is something he added himself.

>We could intervene to have the man get a clean death with a clean soul, or we could faff about and metaphorically wank off about how superior we are that we are above the law.

What a pure strawman. And you're still trying to come up with mental gymnastics on how refusing to aid him right after he requested aid won't break a vow that states you can't refuse aid so as long as it's honestly asked for. You don't give a toss about his soul. You just don't want to save him and at the same time conveniently want to keep the vow without saving him.

>Deciding that his Oath applies to a convicted and guilty criminal, just like it did with those Beastmen we hung ourselves and defended hanging them to Craven, fits in perfectly with Haughty and not Idealistic.

Bullshit. Hanging warriors who refused his offer of quarter isn't comparable with hanging a runaway serf escaping harsh mistreatment. You're disingenuous to your core.

>Interesting how you're accusing me of not caring about the serf, but you haven't even thought about what happens after we leave. What are we going to do, kidnap the serf? I'm sure he'll have a fantastic time once we're gone.

We have him join the convoy with the rest of the pilgrims. The Sisters and Sister Ignatius can take care of him. He can become a monk after the pilgrimage is over.
>>
Yeah, that's absolute nonsense. It's just refusal to aid him and breaking the vow. Complete pathetic attempt to shirk the vow and pretend you didn't break it. If anyone's soul needs saving, it's that cunt Jean Sinclair..
>>
>>4111859
>>[Idealist]
I won't say the serf has it coming to him, but he has shown no loyalty to his liege, no strength or cleverness in order to break free or evade capture, and no backbone as he pleads for his life from the peers of those who he wishes to escape.

He should be regarded as an untrustworthy sort, but at least granted a modicum of human decency.
>>
>>4111859

>“Sir Sinclair, if you would indulge me. Allow our priest to speak a few words over the poor man.” The man’s life is forfeit, as dictated by law. He is a condemned criminal and the code was not meant to apply to such. But perhaps his soul can still be saved. [Idealist]
Aside from all the shitflinging going here, I
m going to go with the option that tries to maintain a consistent character. The write-in makes it kind of awkward, since we just said we're not questioning his authority, but as soon as he says he doesnt care about our suggestion, we want to question his authority? Wouldn't that unironically break our vow again? Considering Emile did choose to mercy kill the old man, hes not heartless, so idealist makes sense in terms of character.
>>
>>4111985
7 DC difference isn't a big margin.
>>
>>4112023
The difference is that the serf just asked us for aid. Actually aiding him instead of breaking our vow is in-character. Emile already helped that peasant kid against the noble boys. The serf isn't getting a mercy kill. He's going to be hanged slowly and painfully.
>>
>>4109838
>scabbed limbs


What does that mean? English isn't my first language but dictionary tells me its after effect of wounds so was he wounded, beaten?
>>
>>4112029
Forgotten already said our vow is subjective in this case, If an enemy asked our aid because he wants to win the fight we obviously dont have to help them. Ditto for a convicted rapist or something. If we wanted to challenge the original conviction then we shouldnt have gone with the write in that says its literally not challenging the conviction.
>>
>>4112037
Not beaten, just rough labour without gloves for a lifetime.

Little cuts and scratches add up quickly.
>>
>>4112025
It's more than enough to kill a Kid.
>>
>>4111859
>“Pit. Fucking. Damn it. *sigh* Sir Sinclair, I am afraid I must insist on a duel after all. With me.” You don’t give a damn about the bloody serf, but you must live up to the Knight’s Code. Even when you would rather do anything but. [Haughty]

Fucking peasants and fucking Sir Sinclair, dealing with fae and beastmen was easier and more clear cut than this.
>>
>>4112037
It means his skin has healed over 'something'. Broken blisters, bruised knees, beatings, cuts, scrapes, etc. Basically he looks like he's been working a field all his life, because he has. Bludgeoning optional, not required.
>>
>>4112022
No point in being ''loyal'' to a cruel liege who has no strength, cleverness, and is only good for hanging his runaway serfs. Willing obedience always beats forced obedience.

>Trying to escape harsh serfdom and execution means you're untrustworthy.

What retarded bullshit. ''If you attempt to escape oppression, then you're untrustworthy''. At least try to come up with better justifications.

>>4112039
Read the vow.

>You may refuse no call for aid, honestly asked for.

An enemy asking for aid during battle to win fight isn't aid honestly asked for. What part of this do you not understand? Honestly at this are vows are worthless as we'll just try to shirk them whenever they become inconvenient. They're just free mechanic bonuses.
>>
>>4112049
You insult people a lot. Have you considered letting the conversation go, instead of fighting with a bunch of people? It's just a game.
>>
>>4112049
ok so if a child murderer is about to be executed but asks us for help earnestly, do we have to help him? not saying its equivalent to this case, but wheres the limit? what does "honestly asked for" mean? just that they dont have bad intentions for us? what if someone was trying to harm someone else and asks us? what if they ask us to steal back some family heirloom that was rightfully theirs? what if the way they want us to help them is different from whats actually 'good' for them?

Its just not as simple as you're making it. Honestly I agree that we shouldve helped the peasant, but we explicitly voted to not interfere. The vow shouldnt make a difference in this case, so the choice is already made. I'd rather this quest not turn into a tug of war and make Emile bipolar, so even though I dont really like the decision, I'm trying to be consistent, everyone understand what the write in said when they voted for it. Changing our minds now is trying to have our cake and eating it too.
>>
>>4112058
You're trying to push the ''it's subjective'' excuse with illogical scenarios and whatabouttism. They must have a good intention to save them. A child murderer will have bad intentions. In this case, you can push subjectivity till infinity, but it still won't change that you're refusing to aid him even though he has a good intention which is literally what the vow demands. He doesn't want a confession and pretending that a confession is ''aid'' is pathetic not to mention dishonest.
>>
>>4112058
The consistency in this case is to help the serf.

We already did it in previously + help beastfolks. Consistent roleplay means we have to help the serf here or else the character of Emile makes no sense at all. Save beastfolks, considered by many as the enemy of mankind, but let a peasant, whose only crime is to have tried to flee his country, be executed in the most gruesome and painful way ?
>>
>>4111859
>>“Sir Sinclair, if you would indulge me. Allow our priest to speak a few words over the poor man.” The man’s life is forfeit, as dictated by law. He is a condemned criminal and the code was not meant to apply to such. But perhaps his soul can still be saved. [Idealist]
>>
If you guys want to play the archetype of the absolute Lawful Neutral knight who applies the law completely blindly, even when it's immoral, I'm fine with it if we play this with our next character after the death of Emile, that would actually be interesting. But that's not how we've played Emile since the beginning, we actually did the complete opposite. Changing in such a drastic way now and let a man die like this before our eyes would be the exact opposite of what's Emile have been for 20 threads.
>>
>>4112070
What are good intentions? Also I dont think we're fulfilling our vows with the confession I just think thats what Emile would do.
>>4112073
If you look at my post history, I literally agree with you. But we already voted on this choice. I dont want other anons overturning my votes later on just because they didnt get what they want initially, so I'll stay consistent with what we already decided to do. If emile was going to help out the peasant, we shouldnt have voted for the write in that says, "hey I'm not going to interfere but heres my advice". Choosing to interfere after he ignores our advice is hypocritical.
>>
>>4112058
>I'd rather this quest not turn into a tug of war and make Emile bipolar

Emile literally stated this:
>“To the just laws, a righteous man must obey. To the unjust laws, a righteous man must defy.”

He is either a bipolar or a hypocrite in this case based on your vote. He only practices what he has preaches when it's convenient and is more than willing to shirk or break vows when they're inconvenient.
>>
>>4112080
>good intentions
Wanting to escape harsh mistreatment and flee to lands ruled by better lords is one. There is no desire to harm anyone or anything in his intention.
>>
>>4112085
That seems like your opinion, since it doesnt state that in our vow. Your view is perhaps reasonable, but that doesnt mean that its necessary to view criminals trying to escape punishment as having good intentions
>>4112082
Who says a lord punishing his subjects is an unjust law? I dont know why I bother to keep repeating myself, but I agree with you, its just that we already voted on the option that makes emile view Sinclairs actions as lawful but harsh. If we wanted to challenge the hanging, we should have said This is not justice. We didn't. So we shouldnt go back on that unless we want our words to not have any meaning.
>>
>>4112091
*sinclair is not a lord, but its still within his legal right, so point unchanged
>>
>>4112049
He's untrustworthy because he hates his liege but begs for help from another. Doubly so if he has a family and is abandoning them to a man he hates. It is a slimy practice and speaks ill of his character as a whole.

Sinclair is not showing itself in a good light, but they are the law. Your intervention here will not change their practices, and some other sod will be strung up in short order.
>>
>Is it legal
without a closer look at the specific rights a lord or intermediary on there behalf has as bestowed by the Crown yes it is, as a serf tenant has violated the duties to his lord and should under the law face judgement for the dericliction of his duty.

>Is it Just
No because by definition Justice is fair treatment associated with moral rightness, while it can be associated with rights or lawfulness its more often associated with moral renderings because a quick and swift judgment for this matter would almost certainly be the.end of this matter to Emille's judgment but without the specifics of the matter its hard to answer with nuance.

>Is Sinclair a cunt who's abusing his position for his personal jollies
Yes, but us sticking our nose in affairs that are rightly his to pass judgmentnot to be confused with Emille's own sense of what justice is on even if the verdict is not particularly just is not helping things, his particular need to spite any who would seek some sort of leniancy on behalf of the former tenant does little to aid his impression.

>Should we help him due to the knightly code
In the spirit of the vow yes, the technical side as worded specifically by him? also yes but the manner has not been defined and thus can be interpreted somewhat freely within the confines of what constitutes ''help''.

In Summary
>The matter at hand is as far as can be determined legal but not just
>The institution of feudal judgment and justice is failing in upholding its Ideal state due to selfish corruption on the part of the Knight/lord legally rendering judgment, as a knight and noble of the realm it falls to us to correct the system in what capacity we can legally and morally accomplish
>Consequentially a man of lesser station will suffer painful immoral death where he at least deserves a quick painless death
>He deserves a lesser punishment because the crime commited contains little in the way of aggrieving qualities beyond deserting his duties
>As a knight and noble of the realm it falls to us to correct the system in what capacity we can legally and morally accomplish [
>We should do so with our full capacity as we can manage
>>
>>4112091
It doesn't state that we can refuse aiding a runaway serf either so your point isn't helping you.

It doesn't matter if it's a law if it's an unjust law. Jean clearly doesn't give a damn about justice. Get real. You're trying to look for excuses now that I refuted your claim that it makes Emile bipolar. Emile's quote is clear. He's a hypocrite and bipolar if he doesn't practice it.
>>
>>4112097
What bullshit mental gymnastics.

>he hates his liege but begs for help from another.

Nothing untrustworthy about this. His liege is a cunt and asking help from another doesn't entail untrustworthiness. You don't even have straws to grasp.

>Doubly so if he has a family and is abandoning them to a man he hates.

Baseless assumption you made up. We don't even know if he has a family. Here's a baseless one from me: Jean is a pedophile who raped this man's children. We should lynch him.

You're not the only who can come up with bullshit.

>Your intervention here will not change their practices, and some other sod will be strung up in short order.

Oh fuck off. No where did I state that this will make the Sinclairs stop being retards. This is about keeping Emile's vow which you trying to break and lying that you aren't. What's pathetic is all the bullshit justifications you came up with.

>HURR DURR This ma is untrustworthy because h'es trying to escape harsh serfdom and is requesting aid to save his life

>HURR DURR this man is leaving his non-existent family behind (this came from your anus).

Try harder.
>>
>>4112116
>''Your authority isn't questioned, Sir. These are your lands and I understand how the law is enforced in Fallavon. Allow me then to appeal to your authority as the judge for clemency, a hanged man can't make up for his cronies and mistakes. Besides, what good would hanging him do? The example you'd set here will simply result in more escapees, for they have nothing to lose that would deter them. Either they flee successfully and manage to escape their service, or they fail and receive the mercy of death that would still grant them escape from their service in life. That is the example that you will set here, Sir. My lord father, may the Almighty bless him with long life, taught me that the best fortress which a lord can possess is the affection of his people, for willing obedience always beats forced obedience.''
heres the write in. I dont think i can convince you that that its not hypocritical to not want to help out a criminal, since we fundamentally disagree. but heres what we voted to do. Ignoring our other vow for a second, if we said that, and now we choose to question his authority in the most direct way possible, are we being hypocritical?
>>
>>4112147
>“To the just laws, a righteous man must obey. To the unjust laws, a righteous man must defy.”

Here's Emile's own words. Is Emile a bipolar hypocrite? What other excuses do you have? Because you clearly don't give a fuck about being in-character.

No where is it stated in the write-in that we were going to let him execute him if the appeal failed. We're were trying to see if he isn't a retard and will see reason.
>>
>>4112166
>You try not blatantly challenge Sir Sinclair’s authority, but you appeal to him as the authority for mercy. If he refuses you will attempt convince your brother to stand down.
Heres the spoiler section provided by Forgotten, It literally mentions that we will try to prevent our brother from dueling for the sake of the peasant. The implication being we would let him die if our persuasion attempt fails. I'm just sticking with our previous decision. You're trying to make that qoute applicable to literally every scenario and assuming that Emile views this situation as an unjust law, hell even the option to intefere and duel Sinclair literally says that Emile doesnt care one whit about the peasant.

Honestly you seem to be a bit more upset about this than I am and at this point you're just ignoring my posts, so I'm just gonna stop responding.
>>
>>4111859
>“Pit. Fucking. Damn it. *sigh* Sir Sinclair, I am afraid I must insist on a duel after all. With me.” You don’t give a damn about the bloody serf, but you must live up to the Knight’s Code. Even when you would rather do anything but. [Haughty]
>>
>>4112191
That's literally something Forgotten added on his own. He made that shit up. It has no basis on the intention or the results of the write-in. He edited it. What other excuses?
>>
>>4112135
>Nothing untrustworthy about this
It's absolutely untrustworthy. If he was a freeman who became a serf, then he is rejecting the oaths that he took and begging to be saved from his own poor decision. If he was born a serf, then he is leaving his parents, siblings and any progeny behind to be dealt with by a potentially vicious lord.

>Baseless assumption you made up
Historically children of serfs are serfs. It's as likely as him being freeman, perhaps moreso because at least a freeman would have some skill enough to be useful to his lord.

>Jean is a pedophile who raped this man's children
Interesting supposition. Did you come up with that before or after your write-in turned out to be a poor coercive choice?

>Oh fuck off. No where did I state that this will make the Sinclairs stop being retards
Let me just pick this up for a moment.
>>4110078
>Besides, what good would hanging him do? The example you'd set here will simply result in more escapees, for they have nothing to lose that would deter them. Either they flee successfully and manage to escape their service, or they fail and receive the mercy of death that would still grant them escape from their service in life. That is the example that you will set here, Sir.

Sure sounds like your intention was to make the cruel, evil Sinclair family reconsider their brand of justice.
>>
File: images (4).jpg (29 KB, 495x619)
29 KB
29 KB JPG
>>4112166
>We're were trying to see if he isn't a retard and will see reason.
oh sure obviously a medieval JUDGE will change his verdict by telling him a "I am more holy than you"
yeah trying to change the ideals of Justice of the noble hood that is now of their hard ways will obviously work out man
Sinclair is a retard for being a draconic asshole and anon is being retarded because he really thinks that shit could happen and make the """"bad boy"""' change to be a """"good boy""""
>>
>>4111859
>“Pit. Fucking. Damn it. *sigh* Sir Sinclair, I am afraid I must insist on a duel after all. With me.” You don’t give a damn about the bloody serf, but you must live up to the Knight’s Code. Even when you would rather do anything but. [Haughty]
>>
>>4112226
An appeal isn't ''i'm more holy than you''.

>>4112225
>It's absolutely untrustworthy. If he was a freeman who became a serf, then he is rejecting the oaths that he took and begging to be saved from his own poor decision. If he was born a serf, then he is leaving his parents, siblings and any progeny behind to be dealt with by a potentially vicious lord.

Vast majority of serfs are born serfs retard. There's is absolutely proof whatsoever that he left his family. That is a baseless assumption that you pulled out of your bullshitting ass in a weak attempt to demonize a mistreated runaway serf lel. It's as valid as me stating Jean was a pedophile who already raped and killed this serf's family.

>Historically children of serfs are serfs. It's as likely as him being freeman, perhaps moreso because at least a freeman would have some skill enough to be useful to his lord.

That means nothing. Serfs aren't automatically married and don't automatically have family. It's just as likely that the Sinclairs already killed his family.

>Interesting supposition. Did you come up with that before or after your write-in turned out to be a poor coercive choice?

I came up with it at the same you came up with your bullshit. On the spot.

>Let me just pick this up for a moment.

What a pathetic strawman. I'll post your bullshit and my response to it to refute you.

>Retard: Your intervention here will not change their practices

>My answer: Oh fuck off. No where did I state that this will make the Sinclairs stop being retards. This is about keeping Emile's vow which you trying to break and lying that you aren't.

You were addressing the CURRENT intervention, you liar. The current intervention isn't my write-in, liar. The current intervention is about Emile's vows and answering the request for aid. I already know that Sinclair is a retard.

Try harder.
>>
>>4112191
>hell even the option to intefere and duel Sinclair literally says that Emile doesnt care one whit about the peasant.

That's bad wording that imo doesn't fit Emile's previous actions and character. He takes his noblesse oblige very seriously.

Another thing that I don't like is how Emile is acting with Jean Sinclair right now. This is the Emile that saved that commoner kid from the noble kids at Aubrey? This is the Emile who took Mikail as his own squire? This is the Emile who saved Ava from the creeping horror? This is the Emile that charged Sir Hast Vancewell after he learned of his murder and rape of commoners? What do you mean Emile doesn't give a damn? Emile had no business arresting and attacking Sir Hast, yet he still did it because Sir Hast was acting dishonourably even though he was a knight, which enraged Emile. Yet, here is Emile acting all buddy buddy with unchivalrous Sir Jean Sinclair even though he stated that he will make the serf's death painful and slow just out of petty spite.

Emile's haughtiness doesn't mean that he is apathetic towards commoners or that he will let acts of injustice towards them go. He has shown that multiple times.
>>
>>4111859

>“Pit. Fucking. Damn it. *sigh* Sir Sinclair, I am afraid I must insist on a duel after all. With me.” You don’t give a damn about the bloody serf, but you must live up to the Knight’s Code. Even when you would rather do anything but. [Haughty]
>>
Can we just agree on a fucking option please before we all suffer an autism induced aneurysm
>>
>>4111859
>>“Pit. Fucking. Damn it. *sigh* Sir Sinclair, I am afraid I must insist on a duel after all. With me.” You don’t give a damn about the bloody serf, but you must live up to the Knight’s Code. Even when you would rather do anything but. [Haughty]

1st post in this thread because I work too damn much and for the most part I am okay with just reading the story as it progresses; the fact that we aren't 100% behind this option means I have to throw in my lot, even if it wont be counted.
>>
>>4111859
>>4111865
Changing my vote
>“Sir Sinclair, if you would indulge me. Allow our priest to speak a few words over the poor man.” The man’s life is forfeit, as dictated by law. He is a condemned criminal and the code was not meant to apply to such. But perhaps his soul can still be saved. [Idealist]
>>
>>4112688
>>4112005
>>4111859
Letting our Brother fight seems to be the least popular option so I'm going to switch to

>“Sir Sinclair, if you would indulge me. Allow our priest to speak a few words over the poor man.” The man’s life is forfeit, as dictated by law. He is a condemned criminal and the code was not meant to apply to such. But perhaps his soul can still be saved. [Idealist]

as well. It's not totally but it is partially because of how unpleasant some Anons are being about the vote. I don't want to encourage them because they seem to want Emile to feel justified breaking the law whenever her wants, doing it in the woods to stop slavers and save our brother was a very different situation from here.

And that's all I'm saying until the vote ends. Discussion has gotten out of hand about it and people are just being dicks now. Argue with your votes please people.
>>
>>4111862
Stop beening so salty over how shit your writing went, it is what it is and hosntely i would have been pissed if i was the lord.

And besides the rest of you know how low our roll would be and still chose this.
Oh well hope this dosnt end up too badly.

>“Sir Sinclair, if you would indulge me. Allow our priest to speak a few words over the poor man.” The man’s life is forfeit, as dictated by law. He is a condemned criminal and the code was not meant to apply to such. But perhaps his soul can still be saved. [Idealist

>>4111291
This is me.
>>
>>4104327
Me

>>4111859
>I am afraid I must insist on a duel after all. With me.” You don’t give a damn about the bloody serf, but you must live up to the Knight’s Code. Even when you would rather do anything but. [Haughty]
>>
>>4112110
>Is it Just

I agree that it isn't Just to hang the man without giving him due consideration to confess.

But like you said, you don't know how Serfdom works.

The serf is guilty of theft of his labour rightly due to the lord. In all honesty, it's slavery with extra steps.

Still, think of it within the context of the heirarchy. If we oppose Sinclair on those grounds, then we oppose not people within the system but the system itself.

Our reasoning for fighting the Faction mercenaries was based on them being foreignera and slavers, something explicitly illegal (without a writ from the Royalty) and against our faith.

Even then, Emile still refused to fight against the Queensmen, despite them being the ones who killed that Jay we found innawoods and them trying to kill out brother.

We also didn't buy into the Bluejay shit there.

Honestly if we had a passionate write in that condemned Sinclair for treating a man as if he were a Beast, or tried to play on the nature of Piety and Adam and Caine even forgiving the Dragon himself because of the mercy he showed them in the past as an example of how mercy given can be repaid later (as unlikely as it is for a serf, how much less likely was it for a slave to rise?) Then I would be fine fighting him.

We're past the point of Emile wanting to fight against the system. Read the options, they're all about working within the system or standing second to Damien being a retard and making enemies. But at least Damien had the balls to commit to it.

We're only getting involved for personal reasons if we fight, not because Emile views the law as unjust.
>>
>>4110754
My id

>>4111859
>“Pit. Fucking. Damn it. *sigh* Sir Sinclair, I am afraid I must insist on a duel after all. With me.” You don’t give a damn about the bloody serf, but you must live up to the Knight’s Code. Even when you would rather do anything but. [Haughty]
>>
>>4111842
That vote was only going to came into effect if we couldnt stop bro from dualing.
>>
>>4113052
> Damien tenses, his hands curling into fists. Then they relax. His head sinks, a defeated nod. “Damn you, Em. Damn it all.”

Which we did.
>>
>>4111859
>“Pit. Fucking. Damn it. *sigh* Sir Sinclair, I am afraid I must insist on a duel after all. With me.” You don’t give a damn about the bloody serf, but you must live up to the Knight’s Code. Even when you would rather do anything but. [Haughty]
>>
Just going to leave these links here

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Serfdom


https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fugitive_peasants

Running away was seen as the ultimate form of passive, non-violent peasant resistance (with the peasant rebellions being on the other end of the spectrum)
>>
>>4113232
As with slaves, serfs could be bought, sold, or traded (with some limitations as they generally could be sold only together with land, with the exception of the kholops in Russia and villeins in gross in England who could be traded like regular slaves), abused with no rights over their own bodies, could not leave the land they were bound to, and could marry only with their lord's permission.
Pretty much slaves that come with land.
>>
>>4113322
>>4113232
So from reading thies we have no legal right to stop Sinclair at all and realy just making it worse for the fuy beening hanged and for our fimalys rep to other lords.
Just give the priest time to pray for him.
>>
>>4113335
Firstly this isn't earth, those things may not apply. Secondly it doesn't matter if what Sinclair is doing is absolutely accepted and entirely lawful, our knights code requires we help any call for aide honestly made. The call has been heard and we must respond
>>
>>4113343
But its based of earth and without forgotten giving us the laws of each land and how they all work this is the best information your going to be able to use to make a call.

And didnt we just vote to not interfere and stoped our bro from fighting? Kinda silly to then turn around and fight the guy.

>>4111891
As the words of the qm "As you say, it is highly subjective"
So the vow dosnt have to include this serf/ criminal at all as both those types of people have no rights.

But hay vote how you want and fuck up our family's rep and make our journey even harder since we going to be in Sinclair lands for a bit not to metion this would hurt the whole dating game you all are trying for, good luck geting into miss reds panties arfter dualing this guy.

Thats my 2 cents and ima leave it at that.
>>
>>4113371
>And didnt we just vote to not interfere and stoped our bro from fighting? Kinda silly to then turn around and fight the guy.

And then the serf called for aid which means we MUST help or break our vow
>>
>>4113377
> This belief is subject to interpretation.

I wish people would stop lying about how oaths work.
>>
>>4113377
Qm said it is highly subjective" which means the vow isnt 100 going to be broken if we dont help.

Tis serf is a criminal so any help asked for would not count as hosntely asked for as any person is going to ask for help to not be killed.

Like you people going to help every single person that asks for help even if we know they have broken the law couse they have hosntely asked for it if you say no then your going back on the whole we must up hold the vows at all cost and that takes away your leg your standing on.

>>4113383
Qm himself said that its
it is highly subjective" which means subject to interpretation.

Its how even though we have an oath to not have babys outside of a wife we can still fuck guys, get our dick sucked, fuck girls butts and stuff.

Same with the dont tell a lie vow, with claver wording you can tell not the whole truth and kinda lie without breaking the vow.
For each vow there are ways to get around it without breaking it at all.

Do you not rember everyone talking all the ways we could workaround the do not have kids vow??
>>
>>4113392
We obviously see the punishment as unjust and since the serf is asking for aid it triggers our vow. That's my interpretation of it
>>
>>4113398
This is a legal hanging and wont break our vow Thats my interpretation of it

Lets just leave it at that.

Only time will tell which is right in the end.
>>
>>4113398
Do we? From the write in we choose to not challenge Sinclair.

Emile only wants to uphold the vow in the haughty choice.

Forgotten wouldn't give the choice to instead ensure the man gets his last confession instead if it wasn't in character.
>>
>>4113407
I'm not suggesting that that option is out of character, but it does seem to be trying to avoid our responsibilities

>Do we?

Well yeah, it's been mentioned several times how outdated and draconian the punishments out here are and of course we have the option here to back that up:

>“Pit. Fucking. Damn it. *sigh* Sir Sinclair, I am afraid I must insist on a duel after all. With me.” You don’t give a damn about the bloody serf, but you must live up to the Knight’s Code. Even when you would rather do anything but. [Haughty]

That's a clear indication that there is a version of Emile who considers what has happened here as requiring he fulfill his vows and attempt to aid this serf
>>
>>4113416
I see it as a question of whether or not Emile places his vows above the law.

Making the transition to Neutral Good.
>>
>>4113416
Yep. And we get to choose.

If you want him to care about the serf, vote idealist. If you want him to care more about his vows, vote haughty.

This path leads down to Rogue Inquisitor if we keep up with the haughty though.
>>
>>4111859
>Sir Sinclair, if you would indulge me. Allow our priest to speak a few words over the poor man.” The man’s life is forfeit, as dictated by law. He is a condemned criminal and the code was not meant to apply to such. But perhaps his soul can still be saved. [Idealist]

The man is a prisoner who has received a sentence. Now we may view it as excessive, be we are not the judge nor jury.

As such, we do not have to oblige his call to aid.

>>4105791
This is me, in case of ID change
>>
>>4111859
>>“Pit. Fucking. Damn it. *sigh* Sir Sinclair, I am afraid I must insist on a duel after all. With me.” You don’t give a damn about the bloody serf, but you must live up to the Knight’s Code. Even when you would rather do anything but. [Haughty]
>>4111860
No one ever leaves Fallavon
>>
>>4113343
That faggot is selectively posting cherrypicked parts but leaves out the ones that don't. Here let me give you some of what he left out.

>A lord of the manor could not sell his serfs as a Roman might sell his slaves. On the other hand, if he chose to dispose of a parcel of land, the serfs associated with that land stayed with it to serve their new lord

>Serfs who occupied a plot of land were required to work for the lord of the manor who owned that land. In return they were entitled to protection, justice, and the right to cultivate certain fields within the manor to maintain their own subsistence.


>Within his constraints, a serf had some freedoms. Though the common wisdom is that a serf owned "only his belly" – even his clothes were the property, in law, of his lord – a serf might still accumulate personal property and wealth, and some serfs became wealthier than their free neighbours, although this happened rarely. A well-to-do serf might even be able to buy his freedom.

>The landlord could not dispossess his serfs without legal cause and was supposed to protect them from the depredations of robbers or other lords, and he was expected to support them by charity in times of famine. Many such rights were enforceable by the serf in the manorial court.

>A serf could grow what crop he saw fit on his lands, although a serf's taxes often had to be paid in wheat. The surplus he would sell at market.

>The amount of labour required varied. In Poland, for example, it was commonly a few days per year per household in the 13th century. One day per week per household in the 14th century

>"Per household" means that every dwelling had to give a worker for the required number of days.[28] For example, in the 18th century, six people: a peasant, his wife, three children and a hired worker might be required to work for their lord one day a week, which would be counted as six days of labour.

>Serfs served on occasion as soldiers in the event of conflict and could earn freedom or even ennoblement for valour in combat. Serfs could purchase their freedom, be manumitted by generous owners, or flee to towns or to newly settled land where few questions were asked. Laws varied from country to country: in England a serf who made his way to a chartered town (i.e. a borough) and evaded recapture for a year and a day obtained his freedom and became a burgher of the town.
>>
>>4113343
Anyway the "muh legal" excuse is pure bullshit and they don't even care about it. A lawful neutral character went out of the way when we attacked Vancewell and trialed him. We had no legal authority or right to attack him but we still did it. The real reason they don't want to challenge Jean to a trial by combat which is perfectly legal unlike suddenly attacking Hast is because of the chance of losing pussy.
>>
File: really knigga.jpg (22 KB, 600x434)
22 KB
22 KB JPG
at the end of the day everything just concludes with Emile fighting Sinclair
you know a lot of shit could have been avoided in the first place, if you having chose tho defy Sinclair on the first place, at the end you just made both parties mad some way at Emile Damian is mad because you don't side with him on the first place and Sinclair not after bringing the "holier thon u" you are defying is authoritah and way of Justice he use on his land
>>
>>4113932
Damien won't be upset now that Emile will actually save the serf. He's brother-for-life so even if he was upset it will be only temporary.

We got 1 success with Sinclair so he isn't offended at us.
>>
>>4113932
It's a pretty dumb opinion to suggest we should have just fought from the beginning because that's how this is ending. We attempted to resolve things without violence but have been pushed into fighting. These things happen and we couldn't possibly have known things would end like this but we've vows to keep. Damien will get over it, Sinclair may not, but you can't make everyone happy
>>
Y'all Kniggas need the Almighty
>>
>>4113932
> Tracker Jean 2, Fallavon Boogaloo
>>
>>4113935
Got a double fail, so he has a bad relationship with Damien.

Maybe instead of hoping for dice passes, we should make a GOOD write in next time.
>>
>>4113935
anon Emile is going fight him you really think he will not change his opinion because of the suddenly change of heart and opposing against his verdict
>He's brother-for-life
anon you just have to make something he really doesn't approve and poof there goes brother of life you know that doesn't mean this will be forever man
>>4113937
>we couldn't possibly have known things would end like this
anon a lot of people know the out come will be bad we are on the middle of penury whe don't even have the bonus DC of speak truth and yeah tell JUDGE 883 A.C.E how to rule his land and follow Justice
even I consider that challenging Sinclair was the best option tho salve the serf live and trying to talk with the hard and ruthless knight was futile man
>>
>>4113950
I still think working the religious angle instead of lecturing him on governance could have worked better.

Make the Serf face some lightning with us.
>>
>>4113929
We literally caught Vancewell red-handed, and took him to a Court to be tried which had the possibility of him going free.

You literally could not find a better example of Lawful Good.
>>
>>4113946
He has a bad relationship with the Green Knight and it still ain't Emile.

>>4113950
Don't change the subject faggot. You said he'll upset when I provided proof that he went. Read the brother-for-life and what it actually required to go down

>>4113956
Bullshit we caught him red handed. We tried to question him at the river and he answered then we attacked him hoping to murder him because his answers pissed off Emile. We had no legal authority to assault or arrest Hast no matter how you get down to it. Lawful neutral died with that.
>>
>>4113967
From the thread itself

>3 Success
>Sir Andrei and Mikail make good time and catch up to Sir Vancewell
>Sir Andrei's suspicions of Sir Vancewell involvement are vindicated

This was before we even confronted him.

> ”Ah, Sir Andrei.” Sir Vancewell greets you with a smile, perhaps you only imagine his nervousness. He notices your lack of salutation and your stare at the marks on his hands. ”It is the new gauntlets unfortunately, absolutely terrible. I should have the armourer whipped.”

Also

>"I am no village idiot, sir." You use his title with no small amount of venom. "Were they so uncomfortable you would not have been wearing them as we passed along the road.”
As you speak Mikail edges his horse over to Sir Vancewell’s, as you previously directed to. This none too subtly positions your squire between the man and his escape.

>”Whatever do you mean?” Sir Vancewell’s tone is less friendly, his hand dropping to the mace at his side.

>”You know well what I mean.” You state flatly, edging Hannibal closer. The horse twitches, as if sensing that galloping chase was the least of the excitement to be had today.

> "…I am close friends with the Crown Prince and His Excellency Montbrun. Be careful before you make some outlandish accusation…" Sir Vancewell changes tact, his eye darting from you to your squire to the distance to his horse. He is not quite trapped, but the noose is closing and he knows it. The man has a slippery tongue, quite in contrast to the typical Montbrun reputation. He has clearly been at Court a long time. "His Highness would be most displeased if I were delayed while acting for him on a mission of grave importance."

> It is not an admission, not quite. But it is enough to convince you. This man is responsible. But what will you do now that your suspicions are confirmed?

We knew he was guilty of crimes most foul. We chose to also treat him like the criminal he was.

> >”Enough. Die as you lived, like a dog.” Ride the man down, give him no opportunity to reach his horse. You’ll have an overwhelming advantage in combat, but this is legally unsound. He is not defenceless, so this is not in breach of your vow. This man has not acted like a knight or man of noble bearing, so you shall not treat him as one. [Haughty]

Emile made the distinction that as a criminal, Vancewell had lost the normal protections of his station.
>>
>>4113967
Point about the Green Knight.

We should at least be able to get our brother to tone it down a bit after this.
>>
>>4114009

Don't bother. Anons won't admit they're wrong even when Forgotten directly states something different from what they claim.
>>
>>4114009
Literally nothing you wrote changes what I said. Emile's own suspicions mean nothing. He had no legal authority to attack and arrest Sir Hast based on mere suspicion and he certainly didn't have the legal authority to determine guilt. Attempting to murder Hast because his answers pissed off Emile sure as hell wasnt legal either.
>>
>“Pit. Fucking. Damn it. *sigh* Sir Sinclair, I am afraid I must insist on a duel after all. With me.” You don’t give a damn about the bloody serf, but you must live up to the Knight’s Code. Even when you would rather do anything but. [Haughty]

I’m always delighted to see anons discussing the choices and dilemmas presented before them, but please do try to be polite it. By 4chan standards anyway.

---------------------------------------

You do not honestly believe that you are beholden to lend your strength of arms to every criminal or lowlife that asks for it, but something sticks in your craw about this whole issue.

Sir Jean Sinclair is an accomplished knight and swordsman, one who exemplifies the martial virtues required of his station and a veteran of the dangers of the frontier. All that would make you respect, even admire him, but there is a cruel streak in this. It is not the serf himself you care for; you don’t know the villean or anything of his misdeeds and petty acts. Is it unlawful, what they have done? Yes, undoubtedly so. And their guilt is not in question. Aside from the vaguely foul taste it leaves in your mouth, the harsh penalty is being meted by someone with the authority to do so. Who are you, from a foreign Duchy, to question the laws and customs of this realm? You simply don’t know, and ignorance is not any sort of basis to challenge the authority of a fellow knight on. It troubles you, although not enough to make a scene and risk the mission on some self-assured presumption.

So when the peasant calls for help, and you know in your bones that you must answer, you hate it. You hate that the Code would demand you act as such, for all the difficulty and trouble that will arise from this confrontation over one serf’s life. It feels wrong to ignore the pleas for help and move on. And so you must take the hard road rather than the easy one.

“Pit. Fucking. Damn it. *sigh* But now the call for aid has come, and you must answer. No matter how petty the plea, no matter how little you personally care for one runaway peasant. You are a knight, and it behoves you to act as such. Even when you would rather not. “Sir Sinclair, I am afraid I must insist on a duel after all. With me.”

“You jest.” Sir Sinclair is not laughing.

“I do anything but.” You respond solemnly, unhooking your shield from your back. “ ‘His Might Upholds the Weak’. I must refuse no call for aid, honestly asked for. As must we all.”

“This wretch is anything but honest. You are not obliged to lend him aid, he is undeserving of it.” Sir Sinclair has turned his attention away from the uncertain Green Knight and entirely to you. His hand slaps the hilt of his blade. “If you have wish to test me at arms it need not be over this foolishness.”

[1/2]
>>
>>4114046
> Attempted murder

We actually offered him quarter after defeating him, though? If Emile wanted to kill him, he could have there. But instead he chose to go the Lawful route despite knowing Vancewell had "Powerful friends".

Forgottens exact explanation after we chose to apprehend him instead of punishing him ourselves

> My interpretation is that Emile’s sudden attack shows that he has a bit of a temper, but he restrained himself from going down the Path of Thorns in an extrajudicial slaying.

> I will explain the difference between Trial by Combat and Challenges more later, but I feel that some anons are conflating the two. If the accused is not a knight, only they can elect trial by combat (unless on appeal in the realms where appeal is even a thing). If the accused is a knight, any knight can demand a trial by combat once a prima facie case is established. So even if you chose trial by combat earlier and killed him, you would still have to justify to the local lord that there was enough evidence of their guilt to warrant trial (though not necessarily their guilty).

> Challenges are purely personal grudges between knights and are not usually a lawful excuse for serious injury or killing. Without reliable witnesses, it is tantamount to murder.

Let me emphasize the important part

> If the accused is a knight, any knight can demand a trial by combat once a prima facie case is established.

So yeah, Emile could have demanded trial by combat then and there but took him to Norveski instead. Norveski was even upset about Emile not doing a trial by combat and dumping the mess in his lap. To quote

> "And why, Sir Andrei, would you commit this Almighty-mess so benevolently into my lap instead of demanding trial by combat?"

So yeah. I also found an interesting bit on Emile's views of crime and punishment in that thread

> ”Simplicity goes hand in hand with honesty. Vancewell is guilty and should be punished to the fullest extent of Adam’s Law. Any ulterior considerations in judgement… is not justice.” Not wanting to sound naïve, you continue. ”If you must, consider the example that will be set for the conduct of knights. We noblemen are awarded higher privileges, higher honour and higher standards.”
>>
File: Trial by Combat. NOW..jpg (1.42 MB, 3840x2160)
1.42 MB
1.42 MB JPG
[2/2]

“It is not about who is deserving, but what is right.” Doubtless the priests could phrase it fairer, but you know in your heart that you are doing what you must. If not for some lofty ideal of justice, then at the very least because you cannot countenance going against the Code as a noble knight of Cantôn. “Give me your word that this man shall suffer a lesser sentence for his crimes, one without death or disfigurement. A flogging, ten strokes, as it is in the lands of my father. If you cannot, then I must insist on a trial by combat.”


“I disagree. And so we must resolve this as men.” You do not bother trying to convince Sir Sinclair any further, he is not inclined to compromise. Right Makes Might after all, under the Almighty’s eyes it shall be revealed whether you truly are in the right. There is a comforting release in that.

“As men. So be it.” As the challenged party, Sir Sinclair dictates the terms of duel. “Here and now. Ahorse with shield and blade. May the Almighty side with the better man.”

You were about to suggest Sir dan Marc as his second, having been previously acquainted with him at the tourney, when the rasp of steel alerts you to the Fallavon knight’s earnest intention.

“Hyah!” With a sharp cry and kick of the spurs, Sir Jean Sinclair thunders towards you and closes the distance in a matter of seconds.

It occurs to you, as you hastily secure your shield and bring Hannibal about in those frantic few moments where the world slows down before the blur of combat, that Sir Sinclair made no mention of whether this was to first blood, yield or to the death as some trials-by-combat are. But from the lethal intent and the measure of the man, you don’t take him for knight given much to half-measures.

===============================

Combat rolls will start roughly 24 hours from now at 20:00 AEST

(1) Combat Stance – As you are both Blademasters, a roll will be required to assert your stance over his.
>Cautious - Double AV (Max 80), Total unsaved damage to Foe is halved (Rounding up)

>Guarded - Exchange of Blows does not inflict or sustain damage.

>Balanced - AV and Damage remain unchanged.

>Belligerent - Exchange of Blows does not inflict damage; +1 Damage to Foe if any unsaved damaged is inflicted.

>Audacious - Halve AV (Rounding up); Each point of unsaved damage to Foe is doubled.
(2) Lethality
> Despite his skill, you believe you can bring him to heel without risk of killing him. [Your attacks will only reduce your opponent to Injured, at most.]

> Sir Sinclair is not holding back, and neither shall you. [Reducing your opponent to Slain has a 50% chance of killing him if he does not yield in time]

> You cannot spare a moment of hesitation. You are fighting for your life. [Reducing your opponent to Slain has a 100% chance of killing him if he does not yield in time.]
>>
>>4114064
>Guarded - Exchange of Blows does not inflict or sustain damage.
> Sir Sinclair is not holding back, and neither shall you. [Reducing your opponent to Slain has a 50% chance of killing him if he does not yield in time]
Inb4 anons just go full audacious cuz they stupid
>>
>>4114064
>Audacious - Halve AV (Rounding up); Each point of unsaved damage to Foe is doubled.

> Sir Sinclair is not holding back, and neither shall you. [Reducing your opponent to Slain has a 50% chance of killing him if he does not yield in time]

Fuck it. If we're doing this, let's end it fast enough that we can maybe shock some sense into him.
>>
>>4114064
>>4114064
1)
>>Guarded - Exchange of Blows does not inflict or sustain damage.

2)
> Sir Sinclair is not holding back, and neither shall you. [Reducing your opponent to Slain has a 50% chance of killing him if he does not yield in time]
>>
>>4114068
Hey buddy, fuck you.
>>
>>4114074
He's right though, going audacious in the first round against a skilled opponent (he has blade master) is generally a bad idea. We should take his measure first and then adjust accordingly
>>
>>4114064
>Balanced - AV and Damage remain unchanged.

And since we can't cripple everyone in Fallavon

> Despite his skill, you believe you can bring him to heel without risk of killing him. [Your attacks will only reduce your opponent to Injured, at most.]

I mean. We can always yield too.
>>
>>4114075
I suppose since he's a blademaster.

>>4114064
Switch >>4114072 to

>Belligerent - Exchange of Blows does not inflict damage; +1 Damage to Foe if any unsaved damaged is inflicted.
>>
>>4114064
(1) Combat Stance
>Balanced - AV and Damage remain unchanged.

Get the measure of the man first, how he fights and thinks before we charge in.

(2) Lethality
> Sir Sinclair is not holding back, and neither shall you. [Reducing your opponent to Slain has a 50% chance of killing him if he does not yield in time]
>>
>>4114064
>Guarded - Exchange of Blows does not inflict or sustain damage.

> Despite his skill, you believe you can bring him to heel without risk of killing him. [Your attacks will only reduce your opponent to Injured, at most.]
>>
>>4114064
>Guarded - Exchange of Blows does not inflict or sustain damage.

>Balanced - AV and Damage remain unchanged.

> Sir Sinclair is not holding back, and neither shall you. [Reducing your opponent to Slain has a 50% chance of killing him if he does not yield in time]

Guys an audacious charge while on horse is dangerous. Remember what happened when Gabriel charged on horse with audacious
>>
>>4114064
>Guarded - Exchange of Blows does not inflict or sustain damage.

>Despite his skill, you believe you can bring him to heel without risk of killing him. [Your attacks will only reduce your opponent to Injured, at most.]
Let’s not kill him, please.
>>
>>4114064
Forgotten what about the bear totem and borrowing our bros blade? I hope you did not come up with some bullshit excuse to stop us from using it.
>>
>>4114093
It's not like we can stop and ask for it mate, we're already in combat, we're being charged at right now and Damien went off sulking
>>
>>4114093
The bear totem yes, but I'm not going to allow you to borrow your brother's blade.
>>
>>4114064
>Balanced - AV and Damage remain unchanged.
that blade master reroll

>> Despite his skill, you believe you can bring him to heel without risk of killing him. [Your attacks will only reduce your opponent to Injured, at most.]
>>
>>4114064
>Balanced - AV and Damage remain unchanged.


>Sir Sinclair is not holding back, and neither shall you. [Reducing your opponent to Slain has a 50% chance of killing him if he does not yield in time]

We can change our lethality every turn we chose a stance right? Don't see any reason why we wouldn't be able to.
>>
>>4114064
>Audacious - Halve AV (Rounding up); Each point of unsaved damage to Foe is doubled.
> Sir Sinclair is not holding back, and neither shall you. [Reducing your opponent to Slain has a 50% chance of killing him if he does not yield in time]
>>
>>4114064
>Guarded - Exchange of Blows does not inflict or sustain damage

>Sir Sinclair is not holding back, and neither shall you. [Reducing your opponent to Slain has a 50% chance of killing him if he does not yield in time]
>>
>>4111840
I take back what I said here. Sir Emile isn't a hypocrite who doesn't practice what he preaches after all and actually keeps his vows.
>>
>>4114064
1
>Balanced - AV and Damage remain unchanged

2
> Sir Sinclair is not holding back, and neither shall you. [Reducing your opponent to Slain has a 50% chance of killing him if he does not yield in time]
>>
>>4114064
>Guarded - Exchange of Blows does not inflict or sustain damage.
Let's get careful here, Jean Sinclair is a very dangerous swordsman.

> Sir Sinclair is not holding back, and neither shall you. [Reducing your opponent to Slain has a 50% chance of killing him if he does not yield in time]
>>
>>4114064
>Guarded - Exchange of Blows does not inflict or sustain damage.

>Sir Sinclair is not holding back, and neither shall you. [Reducing your opponent to Slain has a 50% chance of killing him if he does not yield in time]

Guys we need to remember that this is Sir Jean Sinclair. He will view Emile holding back as a great disrespect to his warrior skills. He'll likely become upset and go full lethal with the intent to kill Emile if we hold back. There's a higher chance that he yields if we don't hold back since being defeated by a opponent holding back will be an irrecoverable blow to his arrogance.
>>
>>4114064
>Balanced

>No holding back

>>4114097
What a bullshit arbitrary railroad.
>>
>>4114064
>Guarded - Exchange of Blows does not inflict or sustain damage.
> Sir Sinclair is not holding back, and neither shall you. [Reducing your opponent to Slain has a 50% chance of killing him if he does not yield in time]
URSEN!
>4106914
Is me
>>
I don't think that a sword is something you can just borrow, like a toy. Remember to enjoy the quest anons
>>
>>4114181
How is it arbitrary? It's already been established that our brother rode off in anger - with the sword - and that we're being charged at right. this. second. Not exactly a lot of time to stop and ask to borrow his brand new weapon (which would be dumb anyway, we had our chance to pick one up and we didn't).
>>
>>4114205
>we're being charged at right. this. second.

Which is exactly what I fucking said, a bullshit arbitrary railroad. Railroading us into a situation where we can't just go to Damien and ask to borrow his blade. This is a trial by combat. We should be able to prepare and pick our equipment.

At least do a more subtle, less arbitrary railroad Forhacks.
>>
>>4114064
>>Guarded - Exchange of Blows does not inflict or sustain damage.
>>Despite his skill, you believe you can bring him to heel without risk of killing him. [Your attacks will only reduce your opponent to Injured, at most.]

Hopefully we can win without something like the marquis happening again.
>>
>>4114235
You're such a whiny cunt, if you have that big a problem with it feel free to leave. The rest of us are going to have fun and participate
>>
>>4114064
>Guarded - Exchange of Blows does not inflict or sustain damage.

>Sir Sinclair is not holding back, and neither shall you. [Reducing your opponent to Slain has a 50% chance of killing him if he does not yield in time]
>>
>>4114064
>>Guarded - Exchange of Blows does not inflict or sustain damage.

>(2) Lethality
>> Despite his skill, you believe you can bring him to heel without risk of killing him. [Your attacks will only reduce your opponent to Injured, at most.]
>>
>>4114163
>We can change our lethality every turn we chose a stance right?
no anon that not how it works you are choosing how to approach the duel for his entirety of the day, we can change the lethality until some ""event"" occurs
>>
>>4114235
Faggot
>>
>>4114064
>Guarded - Exchange of Blows does not inflict or sustain damage.
> Sir Sinclair is not holding back, and neither shall you. [Reducing your opponent to Slain has a 50% chance of killing him if he does not yield in time]
>>
>>4114064
>Guarded - Exchange of Blows does not inflict or sustain damage.

>Sir Sinclair is not holding back, and neither shall you. [Reducing your opponent to Slain has a 50% chance of killing him if he does not yield in time]
>>
>>4114235
arbitrary: "based on random choice or personal whim, rather than any reason or system."

This is a fed-up, bored guy who wants to get his job over with and is tired of his authority being questioned on his own land. Setting the terms himself (which is his right because he's the challenged party), he decided we're going to fight as we are RIGHT NOW.

That's not arbitrary, that's a perfectly logical and expected consequence. (or at least it WOULD be expected if people thought their actions out a little bit)
>>
>>4114064

>Guarded - Exchange of Blows does not inflict or sustain damage.

> Sir Sinclair is not holding back, and neither shall you. [Reducing your opponent to Slain has a 50% chance of killing him if he does not yield in time]
>>
>>4113929

>The landlord could not dispossess his serfs without legal cause which he has with the serf runing away.

Legal rights is the only rights that count
The law appalys to everyone as it was since with the court we had with murder happy kinght.

Your forgeting the family rep and safety did you all forget that the queensman leaders are looking for a scape goat to blame and kill off right now?

Makeing us hated in any place is going to increase the chance our house gets picked.

Also you vow fags would you fight a cop becouse you think he was treating someone unjustly but the cop has full right of the law? Tell me how well that would go.
>>
>>4114064
>Guarded - Exchange of Blows does not inflict or sustain damage.

> Sir Sinclair is not holding back, and neither shall you. [Reducing your opponent to Slain has a 50% chance of killing him if he does not yield in time]

Guse its time to kill/brake another important kinght and bring more trouble to us and family , demm vow faggs going full retard.
Ether way we should talk with the prists and ask them about the vows and if letting the man hang would have beoken it or not.

>>4112761
This is me.
>>
>>4114307
I support doing this afterward:
>Ether way we should talk with the prists and ask them about the vows and if letting the man hang would have beoken it or not.
Let's keep that in mind.
>>
>>4114294
There are no cops in this quest, you imbecile. Any police misconduct or miscarriage of justice by a cop is something to report. Come up with a less retarded analogy for your pathetic attempt for a gotcha, pea brains.
>>
>>4114321
There are cops,
Or are you forgetting who can detain, trail and kill within the law? The ruleing house of a land are the cops oh and theres also town guards that keep the law and people that give judge and order hangings and such.
Our whole cop system is just an updated version oh what kights and shit used just going by differnt names.

Going right to insults totaly showing me whos got a pea brain, good job good job
>>
>>4114321
You can report all you want dosnt change the fact that if you try to stop/fight the cop your going to get your ass handed to you and charged with interfaring with the law regardless of what the cop was doing at the time.

What we doing right now isn't reporting the guy your now fighting/stoping him.
>>
>>4114327
I'm not insulting you. I'm describing you. You're an imbecile who can't even come with a good gotcha. You're a seething, salty hypocrite who was just telling me ''Stop being so salty'' and ''it is what is'' here>>4112761, but now you're bitching and disrespecting anons and calling them ''(insert ad hom here)-fags'' because they didn't vote the way you want.

Cops are an updated version of knights? You don't know what the fuck you're talking about do you?

Here's what a knight is:
>A knight is a person granted an honorary title of knighthood by a head of state (including the pope) or representative for service to the monarch, the church or the country, especially in a military capacity. The word knight, from Old English cniht ("boy" or "servant"), is a cognate of the German word Knecht ("servant, bondsman, vassal").

Now here's what a cop is:
>The word "police" comes from the Greek politeia, meaning government, which came to mean its civil administration. The more general term for the function is law enforcement officer or peace officer. A sheriff is typically the top police officer of a county, with that word coming from the person enforcing law over a shire. A person who has been deputized to serve the function of the sheriff is referred to as the deputy.

Do you get the difference now, pea brains?

>>4114331
>You can report all you want dosnt change the fact that if you try to stop/fight the cop your going to get your ass handed to you and charged with interfaring with the law

Thanks Captain Obvious. I still don't give a fuck about your false analogy/false comparison, pea brains. It isn't applicable here whatsoever. Even if you're retarded assertion that knights are somehow cops was true, Emile is a knight himself and has full legal right as well as legal authority to challenge Sinclair's judgment in a trial of combat which is completely legal. You don't give a fuck about what is legal or just anyway so who am I kidding.
>>
>>4114351
Hey, buddy, do less coke before you post.
>>
>>4114351
What the hell is wrong with some of the people posting here. At this point I'm expecting Forgotten to get fed up with us at any time
>>
>>4114525
The threads have become unbearable. I haven't voted on the last two prompts. Forgotten's writing is top notch but holy fuck this has become cancer.
Good luck Kniggas. I'm out.
>>
>>4114525
It's always one guy losing his shit on everybody, arguing about "muh fallacies" and insulting people directly. I'm not saying it's always the same guy, but the person who accuses people od fallacies and other reddit buzzwords is always the poster who starts insulting people with walls of texts.

Him and the guy who keeps coming here high as fuck are responsible for 90% of this shit.

Personally, I'm mostly surprised at someone getting upset and being called something-fag.

It's 4chan. Drawfags, writefags, vowfags, it's really not an insult here.

Only thing left to do is not feed the troll.

>>4114532
Aww don't be like that. You can still vote, or ctrl+F Forgottens trip and read the story.
>>
>>4114351
Watch until 9:46

https://youtu.be/9DF9NNWG_fs?t=580
>>
>>4114612
No.
>>
>>4114064
>>Guarded - Exchange of Blows does not inflict or sustain damage.
> Despite his skill, you believe you can bring him to heel without risk of killing him. [Your attacks will only reduce your opponent to Injured, at most.]
>>
>>4114351
Ahahah buddy buddy you gota calm down befor you burst something. You saltwater living whatever it is you are.

Tells me that you hasnt insulted me at all then proceeded to insult me in the next post how was it in your own words "now you're bitching and disrespecting which is what your doing.

good job showing me your brain power right there.

Pretty much all kinghts are nobles except a few peasants that get up lifted for whatever reason.

Hance kinghts that are nobles on there own land are the law and can act accordingly which is what this guy is doing, as its been said over in this thread the hanging of a serf on his familys land is well within his right and is legal even though to us that pretty harsh.

Even Sinclair has said that our vow dosnt count for this serf criminal though that might just be to stop us geting involved( which is too late now) or could be true and we just acting like a dickhead right now.

Im not the only one that has given a what is it you called it "false analogy/false comparison, and It isn't applicable here whatsoever.
How about you give a "true" analogy instead of bitching about everyone's analogys and how they are not applicable.

Though with how your acting theres no point in talking with you anymore.
>>
>>4114617
Oh good, you did watch it.
>>
>>4114532
As >>4114563 said, just avoid the shitty people by only keeping track of Forgotten's posts. I'm also annoyed with the awful behavior from some anons, but they shouldn't ruin the entire experience for you.
>>
File: 1380522459000.png (434 KB, 788x1097)
434 KB
434 KB PNG
>>4114064
Oh good. My only hope is that Emile lives long enough to realize what he's lost.

>Guarded - Exchange of Blows does not inflict or sustain damage.
> Sir Sinclair is not holding back, and neither shall you. [Reducing your opponent to Slain has a 50% chance of killing him if he does not yield in time]
>>
>>4114064
>Guarded - Exchange of Blows does not inflict or sustain damage.

> Sir Sinclair is not holding back, and neither shall you. [Reducing your opponent to Slain has a 50% chance of killing him if he does not yield in time]
>>
Good fucking god, you guys all need a hobby that doesn't involve shitspewing competitions with strangers on a Czechoslovakian mango-juggling forum.

>>4114064
(1)
>Cautious - Double AV (Max 80), Total unsaved damage to Foe is halved (Rounding up)

Don't wanna die to this dude, he's a fellow Blademaster so we know he's serious business, let's feel him out before we go Full Carnotaur

(2)
> Sir Sinclair is not holding back, and neither shall you. [Reducing your opponent to Slain has a 50% chance of killing him if he does not yield in time]

That said, we don't need to kill this dude, and he doesn't seem like the easily-yielding type, so let's do what we can to avoid pissing off House Sinclair
>>
>>4115034
Shit, just realized my ID changed, >>4105615
is me
>>
>>4115034
"Let's do what we can to avoid pissing off House Sinclair" mate i think that time has passed. No miss Sinclair booty for us.
>>
>>4115063
It's not as if he's her brother or father. This is a cousin and whilst it'll definitely have an impact on our chances, this altercation doesn't rule us out of a potential marriage
>>
>>4115034
>>4115034
>don't need to kill this dude
oh look lucky rolls out of nowhere yeah looks like Emile accidentally kill the guy or the other way around
>>
>>4115064
Excluding the entire context of the situation, one might believe that.

Might. I mean, I'd fuck a Knigga up for messing with one of my cousins. Pretty sure most families are the same.

Not like Emile, as a Second Son who ain't inheriting shit, needs as much reputation as possible. Good thing we fucked up the Dukes heir, and now we're fucking up people on their own land because we disagree with how they rightfully carry out their duties.

It wasn't going to be easy to court M. Sinclair already, but this is definitely the nail in the coffin.

Unless we go become a Dragon Guard, or somehow get the equivalent wealth and repute of being one. Because opportunities like that which can change the course of Courts through the referral system totally are common.

We might as well marry a serf, people seem to love them so much.
>>
>>4115132
I think we have irrevocably earn a reputation as a troublemaker.
>>
>>4115143
By the time we reach Pascae we'll have crippled more Nobles of the realm than the Jays have.
>>
>>4115132
The entirety of Fallavon may as well be out for Emile's blood at this point. The nobles hate him, the Jays despise him, the woods hate him; his only friend is a long-armed quiet weirdo without a penny to her name, and a giant bear.

The relationship with Damien is probably also all kinds of twisted at this point, 'rules for me, but not for thee'.
>>
>>4115143
All this concern that Damien might get targeted as the excuse for the Named to hunt him and chase the Faction to Pascae, when it looks like we're setting ourselves up for it instead.
>>
>>4115154
Pretty sure Damien is going to call us out on being a hypocrite for not acting until the serf explicitly asked for help.

Ironically, for all the people complaining about the oaths having to be followed in the spirit of them and that using the letter of the law to be flexible, we're using a technicality of the oath to justify our actions here.

If we were acting in the spirit of the oath, we would have confronted Sinclair right away instead of needing it requested in a specific format.

If only Sinclair had gagged the damn wretch. In fact, I hope we can recommend next time he does so.
>>
>>4115169
Struth. This whole situation seems like it's leading up to a resolution that makes Tracker Jean look like an amusing gaff.
>>
>>4115132
>We might as well marry a serf, people seem to love them so much
you know they just love the commoners hey tracker Jean is there she is better that you normal peasant....oh wait yeah I forgot you also fuck that relationship
>>
>>4115143
And when we finally join that order of investigators?

Yeeeep. Might as well be a leper.
>>
>>4115187
Optimistic of you to assume they'll let us join.
>>
>>4115132
>We might as well marry a serf, people seem to love them so much.

Now this is an exaggeration, we might have a reputation as a troublemaker, but we are a troublemaker that has so far some on top of everything. Trials, duels, tournament and an assassination attempt that isn't public knowledge. We might even use it.

>There goes Sir Emile Andrei, ready to stirring shit again, its not worth it getting in his way.
>>
>>4115244
>There goes Sir Emile Andrei, ready to stirring shit again, its not worth it getting in his way and being his friend
fix'd
>Emile is lawful, no he is neutral
nah he is just another chaotic guy if you go by the stupid chart
>>
>>4115271
Actually, "lawful" by the chart doesn't mean obeying the laws but living by a strict moral code.

Of course, in this case Emile has chosen to be "Lawful Stupid" by first being a pussy afraid of confrontation, and then going back on his word because the serf said the magic words and now Emile can justify it because "Muh Oaths".
>>
>>4115244
Tell that to the Basilsk.
>>
>>4115290
I mean since are wearing its as underpants right now il say we won but the fact is without the fae girl we would be dead.....
>>
>>4114064
>Balanced - AV and Damage remain unchanged.
> Sir Sinclair is not holding back, and neither shall you. [Reducing your opponent to Slain has a 50% chance of killing him if he does not yield in time]
>>
>>4114321

Votes and roll from this ID b8e2Ob6w will not be counted for the remainder of the thread.

I have given you all fair warning and you have continued with your needless antagonism. This behaviour is toxic and should have been addressed by myself long before it got to a point where it is making it less fun for anons to participate and me to write.

In the future I will no longer give out warnings that things are getting out of hand. If you cross the line from spirited debate into outright insult then I will not count your votes or rolls. And now, because I cannot trust that you will not simply samefag to get around this, I will not count any new IDs to vote or roll without linking back to a previous vote.

I shall do this EVERY TIME I have to strike off an ID for cancerous behaviour. Is that fair to everyone else? Hardly, but I cannot continue writing for a quest that has garnered a reputation for such toxicity. If this persists I will drop the quest and leave. Maybe continue on a site where a login is required to participate or something, I don’t know. Maybe drop the quest altogether if it becomes genuinely unenjoyable. I hope not, thats a last resort option.

Reginae wept kniggas, just chill.
>>
>>4115319
Fucking A man. This shit is absolutely ridiculous
>>
>>4115319
hey they say anon-kun is pretty on this season of the year just carry with you some water that place makes people thirsty well that's what they say
>>
>>4115319
Good call.
>>
>>4115319
Right on
>>
>>4115319
I sincerly hope this marks an upswing in your enjoyment Forgotten and a swing towards a more positive enviroment for this quest.
>>
>>4115319
Shame, but it's fair.
>>
>>4115319
This quest is by far the most entertaining I have ever read, and I am totally in support of yo doing whatever it takes to keep it going. I think totally ignoring votes from shit-flingers should make a positive change. Maybe they'll get bored.
>>
>>4115319
This is nothing compared to the shit flinging from back during /tg/ days.
>>
>>4115319
Agreed it's just ridiculous at this point
>>
>>4115319
Love you forgotten.

If you had scenes you’d like to see illustrated, which would be your top few?
>>
>>4115319
> If this persists I will drop the quest and leave. Maybe continue on a site where a login is required to participate or something, I don’t know. Maybe drop the quest altogether if it becomes genuinely unenjoyable. I hope not, thats a last resort option.
>>
>>4115319
Just saying. Trips are thing we can use here if we end up going full login.
>>
>>4115462
If we end up going down that route (hopefully we don't) then we should just use our initial ID name to prevent special-snowflakery.
>>
>>4115467
Good call.
>>
Combat Rolls in 1 hour.


If you are a 1 post ID and make a roll without a link to a previous vote then YOU WILL NOT BE COUNTED, even if you later link back.
>>
>>4115611
Rough on a Sunday for us Canadian players :(
>>
>>4115611
>>4115618
Best of luck everyone, and good night.
>>
File: Lucky Charm.png (64 KB, 300x300)
64 KB
64 KB PNG
Rolled 77 (1d100)

>>4115618
My apologies friend, I cannot slot in another time.


---------------------------

Rolling to see if Sir Sinclair's lucky charm activates.

>DC 50 (rolling under)
>>
File: Lucky Charm 2.jpg (23 KB, 354x354)
23 KB
23 KB JPG
1 roll of 1d100 to see if Sir Andrei's Bear Totem activates, please.

> DC 50
>>
Rolled 3 (1d100)

>>4115621
'ere we go
>>
>>4115622
Nice
>>
>>4115611
Gonna get this in so I can roll! Voted on my phone previously
>>
>>4115622
Nice job mate.
>>
>>4115625
>>4115626
Link to a previous vote or I cannot accept any rolls you make. Sorry for the extra step.
>>
>>4115622
Very blessed
>>4106914
>>4114185
Both are me
>>
>>4115620
Glad I stayed up to see a doubles failure for Sinclair.
>>
>>4115622
awsome sauce
>>
>>4115629
>>4105926
This was me, already got accused of samefaging once this thread.
>>
>>4114090
Me

I'm using my work place's internet so my ID might change constantly
>>
>Bear Totem Activated! +1 Re-Roll and +5DC to Combat
>Guarded - Exchange of Blows does not inflict or sustain damage.
> Sir Sinclair is not holding back, and neither shall you. [Reducing your opponent to Slain has a 50% chance of killing him if he does not yield in time]

Riding Roll

Sir Sinclair is mounted on a hulking black charger to match your own brown destrier. Hannibal is princelier, certainly, but the claw scars raking the left side of his opposite’s neck are testament to the veteran status of the warhorse bearing down on you both.

>Hannibal / Equal breeding to Opponent
>50DC


Double Fail = Vicious Opponent. +1 Re-Roll on next Sinclair Destrier attacks.
0 = Hannibal is slow to react, not quite ready for the sudden battle. Sir Sinclair’s destrier crashes into him with unforgiving. Opponent gains Charge bonus, +1 Adverse Blademaster Re-Roll.
1 = You manage to foul Sir Sinclair’s charge, but the momentum he still retains on the approach will give him an initial advantage. No charge bonuses, +1 Adverse Blademaster Re-Roll.
2 = The two of you clash in a blur of steel and flailing hooves. As your blades meet, neither of you has a clear advantage. No charge bonuses, No Blademaster Re-Rolls.
3 = Hannibal will not be shown up by some provincial pony, your steed overwhelms the momentum of his opponent’s charge with his own furious strength. Gain Charge bonus, Gain +1 Blademaster Re-Roll.
Double Pass = Hannibal Est. +1 Re-Roll on next Andrei Destrier attacks.


3 rolls of 1d100. You have no riding re-rolls.

Hannibal Est
>>
Rolled 85 (1d100)

>>4115657


Salve Reginae bless me with a crit!
>>
Rolled 16 (1d100)

>>4115657
>>
Rolled 60 (1d100)

>>4115657
>>
Rolled 25 (1d100)

>>4115657
>>
File: Black Destrier (1).jpg (340 KB, 1024x735)
340 KB
340 KB JPG
>>4115658
>>4115659
>>4115661
>1 Success
>You manage to foul Sir Sinclair’s charge, but the momentum he still retains on the approach will give him an initial advantage. No charge bonuses, +1 Adverse Blademaster Re-Roll.

I need 1 roll of 1d100 to see how Sir Andrei's swordsmanship fares against this Fallavon knight.

Blademaster Roll

>DC 50
>Opponent Momentum +1 Adverse Roll
>>
Rolled 43 (1d100)

>>4115666
>>
Rolled 50 (1d100)

>>4115666
>>
Rolled 100 (1d100)

>>4115666
>>
>>4115671
Holy shit, thank fuck he said 1 roll
>>
>>4115671
Jesus
>>
>>4115671
gee I hope you don't count
>>
File: [Screams internally].gif (359 KB, 384x288)
359 KB
359 KB GIF
>>4115671
OH SHIT DODGED A GODDAMN BULLET THERE
>>
Rolled 18 (1d100)

>>4115668
Attempting to use the Adverse re-roll.
>>
>>4115677
Nice!
>>
>>4115677
Failed. Sir Andrei retains his combat stance of choice.
>>
>>4115666
SPOOKY DIGITS
>>
>>4115671
What are the chances of us rolling a 100 again?
>>
will we have mark of cain from the flogging or will start just with battered meaning we are 5 dc lower then usual
>>
>>4115684
100 to 1 :^)
>>
>>4115684
Best not to bait fate
>>
>>4115685
We didn't pick flogging
>>
>>4115685
what flogging Anon you know Emile is taking the lighting right
>>
Rolled 12 (1d100)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=trxSGpAA31Q – Trial by Combat

------------------------------------------------

Monegan, 17th Day of Novrimun, 883 A.C.E. - West Fallavon Roads
Trial by Combat at the Sinclair Crossroads
>Guarded - Exchange of Blows does not inflict or sustain damage.

Sir Emile Andrei, Young Knight of Romaine: Healthy
>Combat = +39DC [Healthy +5DC, Strong +5DC, Castle-forged Arming Sword +5DC, Breastplate and Helm +10DC, Blademaster +10DC, Sore Shoulder -1DC, No Restraint -0DC, Might of Ursen +5DC]
>Armour Value = 48AV [Breastplate and Helm +20AV, Heater Shield +20AV, Guardian +6AV, Basilisk Scale Shirt +7AV,Sinclair: Avenger -5AV,]
>Combat Re-Rolls = 5 [Holy Orders +1, Courageous Sky +1, Lady's Favour +1, Blessed Artefact +1, Bear Totem +1]
>Armour Value Re-Rolls = 1 [Shield of Faith +1 Re-Roll, Sinclair: Breaker of Chains +1 Adverse Re-Roll]

VS

Sir Jean Sinclair, Young Knight of Fallavon: Healthy
>Combat = +35DC [Healthy +5DC, Quick +5DC, Castle-forged Bastard-sword +5DC, Breastplate and Helm +10DC, Blademaster +10DC, No Restraint -0DC]
>Armour Value = 35AV [Breastplate and Helm +20AV, Heater Shield +20AV, Andrei: Avenger -5AV]
>Combat Re-Rolls = 2 [Lady's Favour +1, Sword of Man +1]


Crit-fail = Suffer a mighty blow (3 degrees of damage sustained AND dismounted/disarmed)
0 Success = Suffer a solid blow (2 degrees of damage sustained)
1 Success = Exchange glancing blows (1 degree of damage inflicted and sustained)
2 Success = Inflict a solid blow (2 degrees of damage inflicted)
3 Success = Inflict a mighty blow (3 degrees of damage inflicted)
Crit-pass = Inflict a killing blow (what it says on the tin)
Doubles Pass = +1 damage ignores opponent AV or Dismounted/Disarmed penalty
Doubles Fail = Dismounted and/or Disarmed penalty


(1) Personal Combat
>Personal Combat 54DC

(2) Destrier Attack
>33 DC

(3) Opponent Destrier Attack
>33 DC (QM roll under attempt, this post.

4 rolls of 1d100, kniggas. You have 5 re-rolls. Sir Sinclair will use ONE of his re-rolls this round. You can use your re-rolls on the Hannibal's attacks as well, but with the low DC I would not advise it.

The Wolf Sinclair, a dangerous and skilled opponent.
>>
>>4115690
oh mixed it up with the attire one sorry
>>
>>4115691
New rollers?
>>
Rolled 94 (1d100)

>>4115691
>>
Rolled 178614 (1d300000)

>>4115688
> 1 in 300,000 chance to get struck by lightning in the US
Rolling for lightning strike RIGHT NOW
>>
Rolled 76 (1d100)

>>4115691
Dragon, grant me your strength
>>
Rolled 77 (1d100)

>>4115691
>>
>>4115693
No go ahead, I will call new rollers for the next round though.
>>
Rolled 55 (1d100)

>>4115691
Welp lets see if we can salvage something
>>
>>4115697
fug
>>
Rolled 10 (1d100)

>>4115691
i know is not the moment but healthy DC doesn't count as a benefit of wealth you know we are on the middle of penury or that doesn't count
>>
>>4115700
Well. At least we only have one doubles fail.
>>
>>4115700
>>4115697
so we dismount one another?
>>4115702
good roll
>>
That's incredible. So many failures
>>
Far from a great start.

>>4115696
>>4115697
The may be re-rolled at the original roller's discretion.

>>4115700
>>4115697
These are locked it. And depending on other rolls is may be a dismount/disarm.
>>
i would try a reroll lads?
>>4115694
>>4115696
>>
This is some Rosseau tier bullshit from the dice gods.
>>
>>4115702
I would say that penury means you still benefit from healthy. The nature of the penance was aimed more at your social status.
>>
Rolled 9 (1d100)

>>4115696
>>4115691
Fukkin Dragon aint shit, it turns out. Rerolling.
>>
Rolled 30 (1d100)

>>4115694
Reroll
>>
guys just reroll once we are on guarded stance on my opinion
>>
Rolled 51 (1d100)

>>4115711
>>4115712
Well done both of you. Using Sir Sinclair's re-roll to challenge this success. >>4115712
>>
>>4115711
>>4115712
ABSOLUTELY VALOROUS
>>
>>4115695
Happy with your lightning strike rolls?
>>
would his mount benefit from avenger?
>>
Wait what about roll for Hannibal? No claimed that which is what is required
>>
>>4115715
Whew lads.
>>
>>4115719
Fairly certain that was my roll as I was the last
>>
>>4115723
>>4115719
Shhhh! We could have gotten by on a technicality.

As it stands, with two double failures we are both disarmed and dismounted.

So. Uh. You guys wanna punch a horse in the face with our shield?

> The return of Captain Canton!
>>
>>4115723
Yeah but you weren't claiming it as Hannibal's which is required usually to count.
>>
Rolled 139727 (1d300000)

>>4115717
>Faith is a staple of the brave, not the wise
I won't be satisfied unless Emile gets a badass scar for penance. Oh how badass it'll be
>>
>>4115725
I'm not about that life anon, fuck technicalities. We take our hits like a champ.

>>4115726
I mean... if all the other rolls have been made it makes sense to attribute the final one to the horse. If no one claimed it, no one was rolling for it and if that's all that is left the final roller gets it. Lets not try to lawyer this
>>
>>4115727
Anon pls stop shitposting and roll seriously
>>
>>4115725
FUCK YEAH CAPTAIN CANTON TIME

COME HERE BITCH LET ME INTRODUCE YOU TO MY FRIEND MISTER SHIELD
>>
fug with our staggering blows he's fucked if he takes damage
>>
>>4115729
Those are the rules though
>>
>>4115725
>>4115726

I would think the 4th rolls is Hannibals, we can assume that going forward unless said otherwise. The double fail for him (55) won't result in a dismount/disarm penalty.

Unless there are objections, I think it is fair to assume that the shield is the first loss in any disarm/dismount result. A double fail next round will mean a roll between dismount and losing your sword though.
>>
>inb4 he gets pissed as fuck and 2 hands his bastard sword
>>
>>4115736
With the hurt we just gave him I'd be impressed if he still has hands
>>4115730
sorry you're right I'll stop shitting up the thread
>>
>>4115735
> Losing our shield

I'd rather keep it. It's done us well, and I'd rather lose the +5DC than the AV.
>>
>>4115735
Sounds good Forgotten cheers
>>
>>4115725
if we got weapon disarmed does that mean we lost the trial by combat you know knights don't attack disarmed foes; well I see that as a possible condition of losing because chivalry you know
>>
>>4115735
I rather lose the blade
>>
>>4115735
just roll d2 for shield or sword
>>
>>4115735
Also we can't go Captain Canton without our shield.
>>
>>4115738
We're going to struggle to do actual damage to a knight if we have no weapon though. I'm not sure we'll be able to cheese our way through it with only a shield again
>>
>>4115740
You really want us to lose aren't you?
>>
Yeah I'm pretty sure getting disarmed is a condition of losing this shit
>>
>>4115745
We still have our dagger.
>>
File: Dented Breastplate.png (348 KB, 388x380)
348 KB
348 KB PNG
Rolled 78, 41 = 119 (2d100)

>Combat 2 Success, a solid blow!

I will roll for Sinclair's AV.

>Armour Value = 35AV [Breastplate and Helm +20AV, Heater Shield +20AV, Andrei: Avenger -5AV]
>>
>>4115750
Fair, I'd totally Forgotten about that
>>
>>4115748
Fuck that noise. We just got two degrees of damage on him.
>>
with 2 handers doubles are risky af when you think about it
>>
>>4115735
>>4115736
>>4115737
>>4115738
>>4115739
>>4115740

Just FYI, if you don't want to roll it will be 1d3

1 = Shield
2 = Sword
3 = Horse dismount
>>
>>4115748
No he never stated the conditions of losing and isn't holding back
>>
>>4115752
Nice, he may have fucked us up but he's not getting off scot free
>>
>>4115757
Fuck it just roll.
>>
Rolled 2 (1d3)

>>4115757
Here you go
>>
>>4115762
>>4115757
Hahahahaha CAPTAIN CANTON.
>>
>>4115757
keep to a roll forgotten otherwise people will metagame hard also just wondering do we have a chance to take the extra damage instead of the disarm?
>>
>>4115757
On that case don't roll. Emile's Av becomes 37 without shield right?
>>
>>4115765
28
>>
>>4115766
What about scale armor and guardian >>4115765
?
>>
>Opponent Destrier: Success

Sir Andrei AV save

>Armour Value = 48AV [Breastplate and Helm +20AV, Heater Shield +20AV, Guardian +6AV, Basilisk Scale Shirt +7AV, Sinclair: Avenger -5AV]
>Armour Value Re-Rolls = 1 [Shield of Faith +1 Re-Roll, Sinclair: Breaker of Chains +1 Adverse Re-Roll]

1 roll of 1d100. You have 1 Re-Roll. Sir Sinclair will be using his Adverse re-roll.
>>
>>4115764
Taking extra damage isn't worth the disarm.
>>
Rolled 40 (1d100)

>>4115769
>>
>>4115758
Sinclair is a blade master Anon, he still has to follow the code
>>
Rolled 72 (1d100)

>>4115769
>>
>>4115768
>>Armour Value = 48AV [Breastplate and Helm +20AV, Heater Shield +20AV, Guardian +6AV, Basilisk Scale Shirt +7AV,Sinclair: Avenger -5AV,]
>>
Rolled 32 (1d100)

>>4115769
CAPTAAAAAAAAAIN


CANTOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
>>
>>4115771
Nice
>>
>>4115762
Look, this time I'll just accept this because CAPTAIN CANTON and I have an idea for it to make sense with the roll results though.

Just a heads up though, in future I will put all disarm/dismount results to a roll as a matter of course rather than assuming any single item goes first.
>>
>>4115772
He also can't run away.


He can still fight, and there wasn't an agreement on where the duel ended, so.
>>
Rolled 10 (1d100)

>>4115771
Sinclair: Breaker of Chains adverse roll. (you may re-roll this if it causes you to fail)
>>
>>4115777
Thanks Forgotten you're the best <3 *mwah*
Also absolutely DIVINE gets
>>
>>4115774
Is avenger active right now? thanks for correcting me btw.
>>
>>4115779
THE GETS WERE A SIGN! PRAISE THE ALMIGHTY
>>
>>4115777
That's fair.

Not just saying it because I'm a shieldfag, but I hope we can get some shield skills or something maybe out of this if it goes really well.

Or buy a shield that can be used offensively. Reinforced, or with a spike or something.
>>
>>4115781
sinclair is pretty good but we yolo'd into a forest so we are better then him now
>>
>>4115785
I will think of something, I'm sure.
>>
>>4115779
> Sinclair: Breaker of Chains

> Breaker of Chains

Knigga. What is this. What. Is. This. I just noticed.
>>
>>4115788
He also goes by "Khaleesi"
>>
>>4115787
>>
>>4115788
Probably a Cain skill.

Hes our cain counterpart. All cain, no adam.
>>
File: lantern.jpg (15 KB, 280x186)
15 KB
15 KB JPG
>>4115787
Weird. File didn't load.

>>4115790
Lol. But seriously Remember where we got our chain?
>>
>>4115788
>TFW the cousin of the girl we're trying to wed broke the chains of ANARCHY
Haha jk but can you imagine though? *wipes brow*
>>
>>4115785
>Emile gains Shieldmasters alongside blademaster
>No longer loses Blademaster when disarmed
>>
>>4115795
That's honestly perfect.
>>
GUYS WHATEVER HAPPENS LET'S NOT PICK AUDACIOUS WHILE WE'RE MOUNTED! DON'T FOTGET WHAT HAPPENED TO GABE!

We have 3 dc rerolls and 1 av reroll left while he has suffered staggering blows effect. We should either go balanced because he can't use blademaster on it or beligerent. Otherwise remain guarded
>>
>>4115798
cautious don't want to kill him
>>
>>4115798
I cannot see him standing down.

Shall we move to non-lethal now.
>>
>>4115798
Forget*
>>
>>4115798
I'm with belligerent. He's out of rerolls.
>>
>>4115798
Just because Gabe died while Audacious doesn't mean Emille will
>>
i think forgotten will roll for his eagerness?
>>
>>4115799
Cautious would be a bad idea. We lost our shield and need full success to even do 1 damage. Don't forget dc will be halved. We're basically giving him an advantage that way. At best remain guarded.
>>
>>4115798
you know also not trying to kill the guy, if we choose the offensive stances we have more possibility of killing the guy(inb4 Anon wants him death) also get over it yeah we know the last audacious charge on horse kill the MC but please stop
>>
>>4115810
it halves damage and doubles av doesn't fuck with dc
>>
>>4115813
and 1 success is 1 damage forgotten said it rounded up at the creeping horror arc
>>
>>4115800
No holding back will anger him and make us lose DC.
>>
>>4115815
How does that make sense? His attitude wont impact our success with the DC. Also just in case that wasn't a typo earlier, we lost our sword, not our shield
>>
>>4115815
he's 2 wounds from dead 1 from maimed
we got too wounded and only kept the arm from fae bullshit
>>
>>4115800
yeah a little late for that Emile is not holding back
>>
>>4115812
I'd rather him die than us.
>>
>>4115817
>No Restraint -0DC,

It will make us lose DC. Let's not underestimate him pls.
>>
>>4115824
I have an honest to goodness, non-troll question. Are you the same guy from that previous thread who wanted to hunt the turtle-wolves?
>>
We should hold back only if he decides to hold back too.
>>
>>4115821
Facts, Captian Canton can't protect anyone from the grave or can he
>>
>>4115828
No wtf?
>>
>>4115832
Oh that's too bad, your ID would have been an amazing coincidence
>>
>try not to kill him
> Hannibal rolls a 1
>>
>2 Damage Inflicted!
>0 Damage Sustained!
>Sir Sinclair is Injured (Mild Concussion -5DC)
>Sir Sinclair has endured x2 Staggering Blows! (-10DC)
>Sir Sinclair ‘Mark of Cain’ Activated! (+5DC)
>Sir Sinclair ‘Do Not Go Gentle’ Activated (+1 Combat Re-Roll)
>Sir Andrei is Disarmed! (Arming Sword)
>Sir Andrei loses Blademaster DC Bonus
>Sir Sinclair gains +1 Blademaster Stance Re-Roll each turn

Hannibal is alarmed at the sudden confrontation, but you manage to urge him into motion enough to avoid the brunt of Sir Sinclair’s charge. Nonetheless his momentum has you bringing up your guard on the backfoot almost immediately. The scarred black destrier slams into your right flank with enough force to send Hannibal reeling back and leave you hissing in pain, luckily though your greaves prevented any break or serious injury.
You have fought knights before and, if the tourney counts, on horseback then as well. But that was with lance and for sport, in earnest with sword and shield is a different matter entirely. You must contend with the sudden and oft unanticipated movements of the great stallions as well. Every now and then one of you will break away and wheel about for another pass, but this as much at the behest of your spirited chargers as it is the knights riding them. His first swing as he passes was meant to open your throat, you have no doubt about that.

Sir Jean Sinclair is not to be underestimated, he such a furious initial assault can leave even the most skilled opponents vulnerable in a moment of overconfidence. It takes a long time for Sir Sinclair to reach that point, his lethal precise cuts find no purchase and he shows no frustration at being unable to break through your stalwart defence as a lesser opponent might. Eventually he is forced to overextend himself. You slam your shield up into his helm with a jarring *crack* in the same moment that he flicks your blade from your wrist. The two of you wheel away, your sword clattering in the road between you.


”Had enough, Sinclair?” Your tone is half-taunting now that your blood is up. Mother would curse your fickle temper, but then again you can hardly expect a woman to understand a contest between men. Even Mother. “That must have hurt.”

[1/2]
>>
>>4115815
>>4115820
I'm not willing to kill him.

And even then, if you reference our previous duel, we had multiple opportunities to change our fighting stance as to whether we go lethal or non-lethal.

Like how that copper clipper went lethal on our ass.
>>
File: Mounted combat.jpg (61 KB, 500x500)
61 KB
61 KB JPG
[2/2]

“I was about to ask you just the same, Andrei.” Sir Sinclair flips his visor up and spits out a bloody goblet of saliva. He digs his spur into his panting black bay charger “And I dare say that the brief pain was well worth disarming you. My turn to do the hitting, I should think.”

========================================

Vote will remain open for 5 minutes.

(1) Combat Stance: As you are facing a fellow Blademaster, a roll will be required after voting for combat stance.
>Cautious - Double AV (Max 80), Total unsaved damage to Foe is halved (Rounding up)
>Guarded - Exchange of Blows does not inflict or sustain damage.
>Balanced - AV and Damage remain unchanged. May Re-Roll results of this and next Combat Stance superiority roll.
>Belligerent - Exchange of Blows does not inflict damage; +1 Damage to Foe if any unsaved damaged is inflicted.
>Audacious - Halve AV (Rounding up); Each point of unsaved damage to Foe is doubled.

(2) Do you yield?
>Honour demands that I cannot.
>Yes, enough of this foolishness.
>>
>>4115832
Turtle-wolves. If we ever find such a thing, we're obligated to hunt the and turn their hide into armor.

Turtle-wolves > Basilisk hide.
>>
>>4115838
>Cautious - Double AV (Max 80), Total unsaved damage to Foe is halved (Rounding up)
>>
>>4115838
>Belligerent - Exchange of Blows does not inflict damage; +1 Damage to Foe if any unsaved damaged is inflicted.

(2) Do you yield?
> It would be rather unseemly if I were to yield without giving you the chance to get your own blows in. Disarming me just means there's less risk of hurting you too much.
>>
>>4115838
>Balanced - AV and Damage remain unchanged. May Re-Roll results of this and next Combat Stance superiority roll.
>Honour demands that I cannot.
>>
>>4115838
>>Belligerent - Exchange of Blows does not inflict damage; +1 Damage to Foe if any unsaved damaged is inflicted.

>Honour demands that I cannot.
>>
>>4115834
>Hold back
>He becomes and decides to kill us if he wins
>He rolls a 1 or we a crit or double fail
>Die
>>
>>4115839
Not this again
>>
>>4115838
>Cautious - Double AV (Max 80), Total unsaved damage to Foe is halved (Rounding up)
fucking hell Sinclair you will understand until wounded eeehhhh fucking cainite
>>
>>4115845
do you really want to be on sin clairs shit books your betting his life on a coin flip
>>
>>4115838
>Guarded - Exchange of Blows does not inflict or sustain damage.
>Balanced - AV and Damage remain unchanged. May Re-Roll results of this and next Combat Stance superiority roll.
>Belligerent - Exchange of Blows does not inflict damage; +1 Damage to Foe if any unsaved damaged is inflicted.

(2) Do you yield?
>Honour demands that I cannot
>>
>>4115838
>Cautious - Double AV (Max 80), Total unsaved damage to Foe is halved (Rounding up)
>Honour demands that I cannot.
We can win this. Slow and steady boys; let's play safe, let him burn his re-rolls, and focus on getting our sword back.
>>
>>4115839
>Get to Carthaggi
>Hear about the Turtle-wolves of the distant east

Thats an adventure
>>
>>4115847
F
>>
>>4115850
You need to understand what type of person. He will see holding back as weakness and disrespect and not holding back as taking him seriously. We won't be on his shitbook.
>>
>>4115856
yeah because he will be dead

but his family will care
>>
I require a roll under for these two choices. First to beat DC 50 gets their pick.

>Belligerent - Exchange of Blows does not inflict damage; +1 Damage to Foe if any unsaved damaged is inflicted.
>Cautious - Double AV (Max 80), Total unsaved damage to Foe is halved (Rounding up)
>>
>>4115847
You aren't excited about hunting the ultimate game Forgotten?

It's honestly one of my favourite memes(?) so far
>>
Rolled 49 (1d100)

>>4115860
>Cautious - Double AV (Max 80), Total unsaved damage to Foe is halved (Rounding up)
>>
>>4115856
I mean. Guarded/Cautious is justifiable since we got disarmed. I don't see it offending him at this point.

But being more bold could be important for our relationship afterwards. We can't stick around to court M. Sinclair, so reputation is going to be important.
>>
>>4115862
Fastest fingers in Canton holy shit
>>
>>4115864
not fucking having another family after our blood
>>
>>4115861
>>4115847
I promised that if it ever came up, I would vote to hunt them. Gotta keep your promises, and anon was so ridiculously enthusiastic about it that I felt it would be a small thing to make someone that happy.
>>
but he's probably going to win the blademaster roll
>>
>>4115866
Yeah I love it, I know they aren't a thing but I kind of hope Forgotten throws in a little joke quest about hunting the mythical "turtle-wolf". That dude so badly wanted to hunt a turtle-wolf, it was just too wholesome
>>
>>4115862
You are underestimating him. We might regret this.
>>
>>4115856
>back as weakness and disrespect
Anon we already disrespect him you know we are defying his authoritah and not respecting his verdict and I'm pretty sure he already see us as weak because we try to be merciful with the pleas of a criminal
>>
>>4115869
i'm not we will have 80 av vs everything he can throw at us and we won't push him to DEAD status unless we get all 3 successes
>>
And a further roll of 1d100 to see how Sir Andrei's Captain Canton style fares against a skilled opponent.

Blademaster Roll

>DC 50
>Disarmed +1 Adverse Re-Roll
>>
Rolled 70 (1d100)

>>4115873
>>
Rolled 45 (1d100)

>>4115873
>>
Rolled 27 (1d100)

>>4115873
We got this
>>
>>4115874
welp didn't matter anyway lets see what stance he goes for
>>
Rolled 3 (1d5)

>>4115874
Fail. Sir Sinclair will benefit from the following this round.

1 = Cautious
2 = Guarded
3 = Balanced
4 = Beligerent
5 = Audacious
>>
>>4115878
well for my failure that could have been worse
>>
>>4115878
new rollers right?
>>
>>4115881
Yes for this round I will ask for new rollers. If you rolled for the previous combat round, please do not roll for this round.
>>
Rolled 59 (1d100)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BLqktDBIew8 – No Restraint theme

NEW ROLLERS PLEASE (so if you rolled for combat last time don't roll for this round)

------------------------------------------------

Monegan, 17th Day of Novrimun, 883 A.C.E. - West Fallavon Roads
Trial by Combat at the Sinclair Crossroads

> Sir Sinclair: Balanced - AV and Damage remain unchanged. May Re-Roll results of next Blademaster Stance superiority roll.

Sir Emile Andrei, Young Knight of Romaine: Healthy
>Combat = +24DC [Healthy +5DC, Strong +5DC, Breastplate and Helm +10DC, Sore Shoulder -1DC, No Restraint -0DC, Might of Ursen +5DC]
>Armour Value = 48AV [Breastplate and Helm +20AV, Heater Shield +20AV, Guardian +6AV, Basilisk Scale Shirt +7AV,Sinclair: Avenger -5AV,]
>Combat Re-Rolls = 3 [Holy Orders +1, Courageous Sky +1, Lady's Favour +1, Blessed Artefact +0, Bear Totem +0]
>Armour Value Re-Rolls = 1 [Shield of Faith +1 Re-Roll, Sinclair: Breaker of Chains +0 Adverse Re-Roll]

VS

Sir Jean Sinclair, Young Knight of Fallavon: Injured
>Combat = +20DC [Injured (Mild Concussion) -5DC, Quick +5DC, Castle-forged Bastard-sword +5DC, Breastplate and Helm +10DC, Blademaster +10DC, No Restraint -0DC, Mark of Cain +5DC, x2 Staggering Blows -10DC]
>Armour Value = 35AV [Breastplate and Helm +20AV, Heater Shield +20AV, Andrei: Avenger -5AV]
>Combat Re-Rolls = 2 [Lady's Favour +1, Sword of Man +0, Do Not Go Gentle +1]


Crit-fail = Suffer a mighty blow (3 degrees of damage sustained AND dismounted/disarmed)
0 Success = Suffer a solid blow (2 degrees of damage sustained)
1 Success = Exchange glancing blows (1 degree of damage inflicted and sustained)
2 Success = Inflict a solid blow (2 degrees of damage inflicted)
3 Success = Inflict a mighty blow (3 degrees of damage inflicted)
Crit-pass = Inflict a killing blow (what it says on the tin)
Doubles Pass = +1 damage ignores opponent AV or Dismounted/Disarmed penalty
Doubles Fail = Dismounted and/or Disarmed penalty


(1) Personal Combat
>Personal Combat 54DC

3 rolls of 1d100, kniggas. You have 3 re-rolls. Sir Sinclair will use TWO of his re-rolls this round.

(2) Destrier Attack
>33 DC
1 roll of 1d100. 0 Re-Rolls. (this will be the 4th roll)
(3) Opponent Destrier Attack
>33 DC (QM roll under attempt, this post)

Honour demands it.
>>
>>4115671
>>4115880
Yes.
>>
Rolled 4 (1d100)

>>4115884
stop it yield motherfucker yield!!!!!!
>>
>>4115883
My roll here >>4115671 doesn't count towards the new roller rule does it as it was not counted right?
>>
Rolled 28 (1d100)

>>4115884
jj
>>
>>4115887
yea m8 it's only for the combat rolls
>>
Rolled 3 (1d100)

>>4115889
Silly me, getting these posts out at the rate of expediancy required for combat does make one err in understanding the context of things

>>4115884
CAPTAIN CANTON!!!
>>
I have to go guys. Whatever happens don't underestimate or hold back unless he holds back.
>>
Rolled 94 (1d100)

>>4115884
OO-RAH
>>
>>4115886
>>4115888
>>4115890

Amazing guys
>>
Rolled 33 (1d100)

>>4115884
>>
F FOR sinclair barley even knew ya
>>
>>4115894
oh Hannibal you try so hard man
>>
>>4115895
He still has rerolls and AV.
>>
>>4115897
He's gonna need it with how things are looking
Hope we don't kill the guy, for our sake
>>
>>4115895
don't count him out yet, Kniggas got two re-rolls left and we'll want to counter more if he's not knocked out this round
>>
Rolled 46 (1d100)

>>4115886
>>4115888
>>4115890
Hell of a comeback.


Hannibal fails >>4115892

Using Sir Sinclair's first re-roll on this 28 >>4115888. If it is turned into a fail you may use one of your re-rolls.
>>
Rolled 51 (1d100)

Using Sir Sinclair's 2nd re-roll on this 4 >>4115886
>>
>>4115901
RIP
>>
>>4115900
>>4115901
Fuck yes
>>
>>4115901
F Sinclaire
Should've just let the serf man
>>
>>4115901
>>4115900
Emile don't fuck around when it comes to shield bashing.
>>
can he burn rerrolls?
>>
File: image.jpg (46 KB, 596x453)
46 KB
46 KB JPG
>>4115900
>>4115901
Adios, Sinclair
>>
File: Sir Jean Sinclair.jpg (401 KB, 2425x3000)
401 KB
401 KB JPG
Rolled 19, 61, 45 = 125 (3d100)

Looks like Sir Jean Sinclair is shit out of luck.

>3 Success: A mighty blow!
>3 degrees of damage

Rolling for Sir Sinclair's AV. If he fails two he is possibly slain.

>Armour Value = 35AV [Breastplate and Helm +20AV, Heater Shield +20AV, Andrei: Avenger -5AV]
>>
>massive family feud started over a dirt muncher
>>
Isn't it a 50% chance whether he lives or dies now?
Also if he does bite it time to find another lady to court because this ain't it.
>>
>>4115907
If I hadn't just used all of them, possibly so.
>>
File: Combat Valur.jpg (1.57 MB, 1920x2680)
1.57 MB
1.57 MB JPG
>>4115907
we can, I'm not sure about NPC's but considering the past history of STV and BCQ I doubt that will happen

If we have to burn a reroll on this I'd say burning the Sinclair favor would be appropriate.
>>
>>4115909
Oh man I can just imagine it now
"Our brother is dead"
"Wha- Who killed him?!"
"The Bear of Andrei"
"Why?"
"A serf asked for help"
"How did he die?"
"He got his skull smashed into tiny bits by a shield"

And that kids, is why the Andrei are never welcome to Favallon again
>>
>>4115912
Well we can still keep her scarf. Great mechanical benefits.
>>
>>4115915
We are the worst romanie troublemakers
>>
>>4115913
Can . . . Can we reroll then
>>
>>4115912
pretty much, at least we're living the Knigga life of having women being the problem of our life.
>>
>>4115919
...It's a bit late. Can we all just accept the consequences of our choices? It's what makes this quest so good
>>
>>4115915
Honestly if Sinclair kicks the bucket I could see Emile and Damien get into a huge argument
>>
>>4115921
Well he has a 50% chance to survive.
>>
>>4115923
Indeed he does, which is another reason it'd be silly to be allowed to re-roll
>>
>knock him off his horse
>snaps neck
>>
>>4115922
>Allmightydammit Damien all you had to do WAS FOLLOW THE DAMN CARAVAN
>>
File: 1582837698600.jpg (14 KB, 181x172)
14 KB
14 KB JPG
>>4115910
but what about cautious I'm reading it wrong
>>
>>4115927
he beat our roll so he override our stance
>>
even if he lives he's like marquis fucking in a stretcher for the tourney
>>
>>4115925
It's cool.

I have a reaction pic for if we kill him.

Hope the oathfags are happy with themselves if it happens.

On the up side, Lady Rabe!
>>
>>4115930
As an oathfag, if he dies I'll still be happy because we followed through with a difficult choice
>>
>>4115929
> Biggest tourney in a decade

> Crap turnout because we crippled all the ringers.

Damien wins the tourney!
>>
>>4115915
It's gonna get even better when the word "Knightslayer" starts getting thrown around as soon as Sir Andrei makes his way into the next court. For good or worse, our reputation will change after this.
>>
>>4115931
Really it's his fault for attacking before setting terms.
>>
>>4115933
we seem to love our duels as well people won't fuck with us 1 v 1
>>
>>4115933
Literally everything we have faced has wilted under our steel
Pit Damn the court I say, let the women handle to politics. If any of the duchies tries to make a move against the Andrei, they'll have to contend with men like Emile.
>>
>>4115932
Now I'm mad Emille ''the Bear'' Andrei can't show off at the Tourney of the decade
>>
>>4115933
The Bear of Andrei, Whose Claws Rend Iron

>>4115934
Absolutely, this shit is where being a hotheaded tool gets you, cut down by an Andrei man
>>
>>4115936
except snek
>>
File: 1582921784534.gif (911 KB, 1277x705)
911 KB
911 KB GIF
>>4115930
but why you fuckers decided to not holding back I fucking told ya I forsee this shit >>4115110 you defy the JUDGE and then kill the JUDGE the fucking vancewells today have gained a Ally you Emile self righteous cunt
>>
>>4115933
All the more reasons to start Andrei's Draconic Adventures as soon as possible.
>>
Sooo....
If we kill him, are we in the clear legal-wise?
>>
>>4115936
Basilisk.

>>4115937
Dragon Guard though. Probably good idea to let the heat in Canton die down a bit before returning, too.
>>
>>4115935
Or they will actively seek us out to fight. It would be cool to get approached by young cocky knights because they want to prove themselves against the "Bear Knight of Romaine"

>>4115936
I just hope we don't get PRINCED and a close ally betrays us by sticking a poisoned knife in our eyehole. Should work on bettering our intrigue rolls, it's a good thing we got the magic fae ferret.
>>
>>4115941
All we had was a fucking shield and dagger. How were we supposed to "hold back"? Ignoring that, we picked cautious but his blademaster roll forced us into balanced. It's not our fault this idiot might die. He tried to kill us and we protected ourselves appropriately
>>
>>4115940
>>4115944
>>4115945
C'mon guys don't embarass me in front of the Almighty like that!
>>
>>4115943
> Trial by combat.

> Shit happens when you play with swords.

> He refused to yield after being wounded.

> We were even already disarmed.

He doesn't have a leg to stand on. Maybe literally, if he survives.
>>
>>4115943
We are but I would suggest we burn our Ladies favor to avoid having to murder him.
>>
>>4115942
>>4115944
Good to see I'm not the only one looking forward to Emile's dragon bodyguard job. I think Cathagi as a whole is one of the most interesting parts of the setting.
>>
>>4115945
Seems like Emile needs a Romani wife so that she can deal with all the politicking for him just like his parents.
>>
>>4115951
For sure I am looking forward to see what Forgotten will throw at us over there
>>
>>4115951
just hope it's a real dragon not a title
>>
>>4115941
Emile has retard strength. Just Lenny's other Knights in duels.

Pet the rabbit, Emile, pet the rabbit.

On the upside, I feel we earned that Shieldmaster trait from all our shield skills.
>>
>>4115944
Honestly fuck the Dragon guard, it's a job paid with pagan wealth to protect something that was only spared by the compassion of adam and we'll be exposed to every filth and corruption they can muster in that City.

but thats a discussion for another time
>>
>>4115957
>we'll be exposed to every filth and corruption they can muster in that City


so your saying more duels
>>
>>4115957
It will be a great way to test ourselves both as a knight and a man of faith. I say bring it on
>>
>>4115957
>>4115951
Oh come on, I don't want to have to duel every SandKnigga in Carthagi
>>
>>4115957
>we'll be exposed to every filth and corruption they can muster in that City

So you're saying our faith gets put to the test. Great because angels literally speak to us.

>>4115958
My knigga
>>
File: Mah sides.jpg (45 KB, 433x378)
45 KB
45 KB JPG
>>4115958
oh goddamit

>Go to Carthaggi to get the heat off us
>End up killing half the pagans in the city because reasons
>>
File: Di4a8DOXoAA1XNZ.jpg (160 KB, 1261x1261)
160 KB
160 KB JPG
>>4115955
> The Dragon

Dinosaurs had feathers!
>>
>>4115951
If I have to be honest, I mostly lurk around these days. Toxicity and some choices (be from Forgotten or players) kinda killed my hype.

I kinda hope the Dragon Guard can ignite my interest once more.
>>
>>4115957
Emile was canonically excited by the idea and into it.

Plus we already know he's morally flexible about who he consorts with, since he didn't confess for his mingling with Fae, Jays, and whatnot.
>>
>>4115957
> walk in the steps of salve regina
>duel unrepentant dragon guard who have lost their way
>fight sons of sin in howling gale of the cathgi sand storms
>ask the great dragon what cain and adam were truly like
honestly i want it bad
>>
>>4115962
>Immediately get hailed as a hero once we return to Canton
I can see it anon, and it is beautiful

>>4115964
Same desu, I only stick around when discussion gets wholesome and awesome like right now or when I feel like throwing a vote in.
>>
>>4115957
Looks like you're in the minority regarding the Dragon Guard, bro.

>>4115962
This is definitely one way to get forced into the Dragon Guard.

From what we've heard, it will only make the Dragon want us even more.
>>
>>4115966
Probably have to join the Guard to be able to duel them.

> Join the Dragon Guard

> Get paid to duel Cathagi Kniggas all day long

> Laughing Dragon.
>>
File: He's not moving....jpg (105 KB, 1023x408)
105 KB
105 KB JPG
>2 Damage Inflicted!
>Sir Jean Sinclair is SLAIN!?

The scream of a horse in anger indicates that one of the mighty beasts has nipped the other, or worse. But you cannot for the life of you tell whether it was Hannibal or Sinclair’s mount that neighed in indignation. Your eyes are locked into the steely gaze of your opponent mere, visors mere inches apart in one moment.

You’ve come to recognise the personal signature of the truly skilled when it comes to the sword. The flair and prettiness demonstrated by the Marquis, the dance and exotic short-steel style of the Langlish officer. It is not so obvious ahorse, with the scream of steel and bucking horseflesh, but Sir Jean Sinclair has his own style. No prettiness or wasted movement, like you might detect in a well-trained but untested student of the blade. Sir Sinclair has been trained, certainly, and extraordinarily well by your reckoning. It is possible he studied under some sort of master in his squire days and this proficiency has been made all the more lethal after being tempered in the crucible of battle. There is no wasted movement, every move and counter-move is aimed at ending his adversary’s life. Sir Sinclair is a finely honed killer.

You catch the next thrust aimed at your armpit on your shield instead. The sword slides over the rim of the shield and clips you full in the face. Luckily the helm holds, else you would be chewing on cold steel right now. What should have been a ringing blow instead glances off of your helm and presents you with the perfect opening to land in a solid blow.

“Urgh”. Sir Jean Sinclair grunts under the force of your first blow, your shield slamming into his ribs. He disentangles himself, pressing in despite the pain angle his sword into a slit in your armour.

Sir Sinclair has learnt all-too-late that you have a style of your own, and overwhelming force is no less a threat just because it no longer wields a blade. The second blow catches him in the helm again, sending him swaying back with enough force to lift him from the saddle. Your third blow, struck without hesitation, sends him flying from the saddle to land prone in the dirt road.

Seconds pass, and still he does not get up.

-----------------------------------------------------------------

> Whether Sir Jean Sinclair should live or die, you know that Mademoiselle Ava Sinclair will now be forever out of your reach. [Burn Lady’s Favour Re-Roll. Sir Jean Sinclair survives his wounds, but this will lead to you being forbidden from any contact with his cousin]

>Perhaps you have gained the Wolf Sinclair’s newfound respect. Or perhaps he lies dead, well beyond such mortal concerns as pride or respect. [Roll for Sir Jean Sinclair’s fate (50DC). If he lives you grow closer, you may continue to court the Maid Sinclair. If he dies, well…]
>>
>>4115913
So.

On a scale of nat 1 to nat 100, how much are we breaking the game/QM here?
>>
>>4115972
Can I vote to kill him?

Just kidding.

> Whether Sir Jean Sinclair should live or die, you know that Mademoiselle Ava Sinclair will now be forever out of your reach. [Burn Lady’s Favour Re-Roll. Sir Jean Sinclair survives his wounds, but this will lead to you being forbidden from any contact with his cousin]
>>
>>4115972
> Whether Sir Jean Sinclair should live or die, you know that Mademoiselle Ava Sinclair will now be forever out of your reach. [Burn Lady’s Favour Re-Roll. Sir Jean Sinclair survives his wounds, but this will lead to you being forbidden from any contact with his cousin]

Fuck waifus, acquire Dragons.

Or in this case, let's do a solid to our family and not give them another political enemy.
>>
>>4115972
>>Perhaps you have gained the Wolf Sinclair’s newfound respect. Or perhaps he lies dead, well beyond such mortal concerns as pride or respect. [Roll for Sir Jean Sinclair’s fate (50DC). If he lives you grow closer, you may continue to court the Maid Sinclair. If he dies, well…]
>>
>>4115972
> Whether Sir Jean Sinclair should live or die, you know that Mademoiselle Ava Sinclair will now be forever out of your reach. [Burn Lady’s Favour Re-Roll. Sir Jean Sinclair survives his wounds, but this will lead to you being forbidden from any contact with his cousin]
FUCK IT
BROS BEFORE HOES, ALWAYS
Almightylike writing Forgotten, as always
>>
I will call this vote in 24 hours gents, no new IDs allowed etc.

I am afraid that due to IRL obligations I probably cannot provide a content update tomorrow night.

All said, excellent rebound from the poor start in that combat! You kept your cool and proved your mettle over a knight who is arguably your equal. Or rather, he -was- your equal match until you proved otherwise.
>>
>>4115976
Mah Knigga.
>>
>>4115980
That was fucking exciting Forgotten, thanks for running
>>
File: 1579124264606.jpg (247 KB, 1416x656)
247 KB
247 KB JPG
>>4115972
I don't know what to do fuuuuuukkkkkkk
>Perhaps you have gained the Wolf Sinclair’s newfound respect. Or perhaps he lies dead, well beyond such mortal concerns as pride or respect. [Roll for Sir Jean Sinclair’s fate (50DC). If he lives you grow closer, you may continue to court the Maid Sinclair. If he dies, well…]
Please you...... don't take seriously the image please
I don't know what to do!!!!!!
>>
>>4115972
>>Perhaps you have gained the Wolf Sinclair’s newfound respect. Or perhaps he lies dead, well beyond such mortal concerns as pride or respect. [Roll for Sir Jean Sinclair’s fate (50DC). If he lives you grow closer, you may continue to court the Maid Sinclair. If he dies, well…]
>>
>>4115972
>>Perhaps you have gained the Wolf Sinclair’s newfound respect. Or perhaps he lies dead, well beyond such mortal concerns as pride or respect. [Roll for Sir Jean Sinclair’s fate (50DC). If he lives you grow closer, you may continue to court the Maid Sinclair. If he dies, well…]
I love risk
>>
>>4115972
>>Perhaps you have gained the Wolf Sinclair’s newfound respect. Or perhaps he lies dead, well beyond such mortal concerns as pride or respect. [Roll for Sir Jean Sinclair’s fate (50DC). If he lives you grow closer, you may continue to court the Maid Sinclair. If he dies, well…]
>>
>>4115965
and theirs no reason to say he won't have last minute reservations about or change his mind, even if he's scrubles has lessened somewhat he still keeps his faith and a fundamental sense of what is right and wrong that is in all likelyhood going to be tested by Carthaggi culture in a way unlike any other be it a singular visit or three years in the guard.

>>4115968
Probably but when the vote occurs Im going to vote no be it futile or not because simply put its not where my interests lie.

Im going to be laughing so hard if the realm breaks into war and Emile's going to have to make the choice between his home and family and his oath.

>>4115972
>Whether Sir Jean Sinclair should live or die, you know that Mademoiselle Ava Sinclair will now be forever out of your reach. [Burn Lady’s Favour Re-Roll. Sir Jean Sinclair survives his wounds, but this will lead to you being forbidden from any contact with his cousin]

You will live Sinclair but remember who beat you.
>>
>>4115980
>Sir Sinclair has learnt all-too-late that you have a style of your own, and overwhelming force is no less a threat just because it no longer wields a blade.

They call me Captain. Captain Canton.

I like that we're fucking up high profile dudes. That rep is gonna be YUUUGE.

Too bad about the increased risk to our brother.

> Wyte band hears of our saving the serf. Woods are filled with confused Jay noises. That one Jay archer girl gets wet.
>>
>>4115972
>> Whether Sir Jean Sinclair should live or die, you know that Mademoiselle Ava Sinclair will now be forever out of your reach. [Burn Lady’s Favour Re-Roll. Sir Jean Sinclair survives his wounds, but this will lead to you being forbidden from any contact with his cousin]

This is fine.
>>
>>4115988
>Im going to be laughing so hard if the realm breaks into war and Emile's going to have to make the choice between his home and family and his oath.


I mean that honestly sounds like a great moment of strife for Emile. I would love to play that out.
>>
>>4115988
> Probably but when the vote occurs Im going to vote no be it futile or not because simply put its not where my interests lie.

Knigga that's what I would hope people do.

> Im going to be laughing so hard if the realm breaks into war and Emile's going to have to make the choice between his home and family and his oath.

Easy. We duel the Dragon to stop the war. Or more realistically, ALL HIS GUARD.
>>
>>4115972
> Whether Sir Jean Sinclair should live or die, you know that Mademoiselle Ava Sinclair will now be forever out of your reach. [Burn Lady’s Favour Re-Roll. Sir Jean Sinclair survives his wounds, but this will lead to you being forbidden from any contact with his cousin]

rather than another knight dead. we’ve started enough shit here.
>>
File: F.gif (3.81 MB, 461x250)
3.81 MB
3.81 MB GIF
>>4115972
>Perhaps you have gained the Wolf Sinclair’s newfound respect. Or perhaps he lies dead, well beyond such mortal concerns as pride or respect. [Roll for Sir Jean Sinclair’s fate (50DC). If he lives you grow closer, you may continue to court the Maid Sinclair. If he dies, well…]
fire PUSS IS OURS
>>
>>4115997
F. This is me >>4111883
>>
>>4115992
without a doubt it will a great moment however I'd honestly not face it considering Canton is the realm we've known our entire life and our loyalties and Family remain here and with the conspiracies afoot and now potential family grievances Im not sure we can protect our family by leaving for three years to a foreign land far away.

>>4115996
>Duel the Dragon
>Duel the entire dragonguard

do I hear the DRAGONING?!
>>
>>4116002
The problem is that the idea we need to protect them comes with a ton of assumptions. At the moment the only threat to our lands is the Deadmen and our family and the families in our Dutchy are dealing with that as best they can. We don't know any war is coming, and it would be silly to base our lives around such an assumption. Going to Cathargi is not unusual for a knight errant, especially not for one doing the full religious thing like us. It's been said also that serving in the Dragon Guard is a prestigious thing that isn't looked down on and it obviously brings with it quite a bit of potential wealth and experience.

I can't see a reason not to ho
>>
>>4116002
If Sinclair dies, it might be the only way to protect them. Otherwise our presence will give people the excuse to act against them.

Because they tried to kill Damien, we can't really join the Queensmen. We've also pretty solidly burned our bridges with the Faction nobles too, if we even were willing to side with them in the first place.

Being neutral would be great, but let's not pretend for a moment we would be capable of that if we were present.

So we're probably going to be put in a bad position if the external strife does escalate. Best to stay away so our family can keep out of the whole mess.
>>
>>4116002
also if we use meta information we know that the prime serpent is mobilizing rabe is gonna have a bad time and some shit is happening on romaine too you know the nunnery's
>>
>>4116006
That prestige will be really helpful too.

We can also give the wealth away if anons are really upset by it. Donate it to the Church, in a way it's like the Dragons pride is providing for his foes that way..

We would get so much clout if we did that.
>>
>>4116008
> Metagaming

Disgusting.
>>
>>4116008
Never vote with meta in mind. That's the way of the worst kind of copper clipper
>>
>>4116010
bold words coming from you shield fag
>>
>>4116015
Hey, we rolled for it. And I supported rolling here >>4115761
>>
>>4115972
>Perhaps you have gained the Wolf Sinclair’s newfound respect. Or perhaps he lies dead, well beyond such mortal concerns as pride or respect. [Roll for Sir Jean Sinclair’s fate (50DC). If he lives you grow closer, you may continue to court the Maid Sinclair. If he dies, well…]

Do we still have some of those healing plants we pick up in the woods? I think we have have half to the sister.
>>
>>4116018
Anon the fae used the herbs on Emile and he is injured internally, also this is not resident evil
>>
>>4116018
As I understand it, Emile gave half of the medicinal herbs to the Sisters of Mercy and the rest he sold at the markets. There medicinal value was also for aches and ongoing pains rather than serious injuries like here. Good thinking outside of the box though.
>>
>>4116019
Well we learn our lesson, Fallavonians are clearly the delicate sort. Got play with kid gloves with them.
>>
>>4116021
Ok, let me keep trying. What about our charm and his? Can ours kick start his since it's an improve version?
>>
>>4115621
>>4115622
Never a good sign. Someone's dying tonight.
>>4115972
>>Whether Sir Jean Sinclair should live or die, you know that Mademoiselle Ava Sinclair will now be forever out of your reach.
>>
>>4116024
Come on man... everything we do has consequences, don't try to weasel out of them
>>
>>4116006
we know their is tension and conflict below the surface of Canton society, and that that tension and conflict could very well endanger our family should our involvment become known or our brothers trumped up charges be escalted, I don't think its so silly to be wary of such mercurial threats to our house.

>I can't see a reason not to

as I've said before joining the dragon guard is effectively giving three years of our life, of adventuring, courtship and autonamy to a heathen city full of slavers, heresy and debauchery we may be as pious and righteous a Knigga as ever produced by Canton but that shit will test us maybe even break or taint us, we'll miss the largest Tourney of the decade to it and all the prestige and opportunities we could gain at such an even and we'll also lose the chance to tie up the loose ends of the conspiracy we have from Fallavon.

as a player I suspect things may come to a head at the tourney in some fashion, it's too big of an event to not have shit go down

I wonder if the vow against abidding a villian would count against what we have in the conspiracies regarding Alderauge?

>>4116007
Thats not true, it protects us from reprisal but if the feelings were strong enough it could lead some foolish lad to take punitive action against our family on the road or even at home, though to be fair I doubt this affair would garner such a response.

From a factional perspective we have started from a fairly staunch anti-queensmen position, their regard for collatoral in Fallavon also really hasn't done them any favors though I suppose if the coins were to fall far enough anything regarding them is possible, regarding the faction Knights at this point we have little to tell if they are a largerer faction or just mercenaries employed by the duke of Montbrune or whoever was in rough enough waters to employ mercenaries to slave people and beastmen and commit fraud on Imperial warrants if they aren't part of a larger more concerning faction.

None of that at this point has really disuaded our familial stance of being Kingsmen given none of this correlates to that faction without considerable concern of those unsigned warrants which are fraud at best and top tier corruption at worst.

>Best to stay away so our family can keep out of the whole mess.
I seriously don't think that would be the case, if the realm goes to war even internally the whole damn nation will be dragged into it from Dukes to errant knights
>>
>>4116026
That's like thinking we shouldn't come up
with good write-ins because they weren't one of the initial options.
>>
>>4115988
Im going to be laughing so hard if the realm breaks into war and Emile's going to have to make the choice between his home and family and his oath.
you are not the only one I'm pretty sure qm is really eager to see the decision on the future
>>
>>4116027
>>as I've said before joining the dragon guard is effectively giving three years of our life, of adventuring, courtship and autonamy to a heathen city full of slavers

I mean... it is just another avenue for adventure, another path, and it comes with it's own twists and intrigue

>but that shit will test us maybe even break or taint us

Which sounds like a great test for Emile, and a fun experience in game

>we'll miss the largest Tourney of the decade to it

We're missing that regardless because we made a promise to get the pilgrims to their final destination which is in Cathagi

>>we'll also lose the chance to tie up the loose ends of the conspiracy we have from Fallavon

I'm not sure what is left to tie up? We are laying low and we can't tell anyone about it. We went into the woods to get our brother out, the rest is someone elses problem. If we get in even deeper it's not just ourselves at risk but our family


>>4116033
They aren't the same thing at all. One is coming up with a creative choice or tactic that Forgotten may have missed and another is attempting to avoid the consequences of our actions. We had the opportunity to avoid fighting, we had the opportunity to concede the fight, we (including me) chose to fight on and we won and it came with unintended consequences.

We've been given the opportunity to avoid killing him outright which is pretty gracious of Forgotten. Attempting to wipe the slate clean and effectively retcon the massive martial success we had on top of that is a cop out. By rights he should be dead, if we vote to avoid having that happen we (and he) should be happy to leave with his injuries
>>
>>4116036
These are all the points needed to convince me Dragon Guard will be a fun adventure to have.

It also puts us in a position to try and convert the Dragon.
>>
>>4115972
>Perhaps you have gained the Wolf Sinclair’s newfound respect. Or perhaps he lies dead, well beyond such mortal concerns as pride or respect. [Roll for Sir Jean Sinclair’s fate (50DC). If he lives you grow closer, you may continue to court the Maid Sinclair. If he dies, well…]
>>
>>4115972
>>Perhaps you have gained the Wolf Sinclair’s newfound respect. Or perhaps he lies dead, well beyond such mortal concerns as pride or respect. [Roll for Sir Jean Sinclair’s fate (50DC). If he lives you grow closer, you may continue to court the Maid Sinclair. If he dies, well…]

This is the option that will make the story far more interesting, whether we fail or succeed the roll. Either we gain the respect of Sinclair, or he dies and now the story becomes REALLY interesting.

Come on guys, for the sake of storytelling and adventures.
>>
>>4115972
>> Whether Sir Jean Sinclair should live or die, you know that Mademoiselle Ava Sinclair will now be forever out of your reach. [Burn Lady’s Favour Re-Roll. Sir Jean Sinclair survives his wounds, but this will lead to you being forbidden from any contact with his cousin]

>Emile goes without his brothers blade
>Sinclair has a charge advantage on him
>Gets disarmed
>Emile still absolutely BTFOs him by going Captain Canton mode on his ass and bashing him near to death with a shield
>Couldn't even inflict a single damage point on Emile because Emile is a tank being an incredibly strong, huge as fuck dude who tanks and delivers great punishment in equal measure

Man Emile is fucking terrifying when you see him through the eyes of his opponents. He's built like a bear and has nearly killed every knight he faced with only his restraint saving them from his temper. At this point I expect people to be intimidated by him and to hesitate on whether they should face him. He crippled the Marquis, rekt Hewitt even after Hewitt cheated, showed Sinclair a glimpse of the afterlife, and only let Hast live because he wanted to see him punished legally and justly.

Imagine the reaction of the spectators right now. Emile is the victor without even a scratch and Jean is nearly a vegetable. I feel sorry for the poor bastard who'll be facing Emile when he finally loses his temper and goes bear berserk mode.
>>
>>4116036
>I mean... it is just another avenue for adventure, another path, and it comes with it's own twists and intrigue

That was a showerthought I had just after posting and Kresden from BCQ shows that a lot can happen in one place if the QM commits to it.

still I chafe at the thought of commitment and do not relish the idea.

Really my point behind the threats we face to our soul & ethics is that as we've already seen their are things, pit spawned terrible things such as the Son of sin that will make pious man doubt and turn against our fellows even if Emille has some pugilistic bravado about being tested by foreign devils and their likely numerous corruption and coming out on top he would pause at the idea of facing such a thing again, even with the proverbial and litreal angel on his shoulder as a reassurance.

I'm against doing this entire pilgrimage immediately simply because as I've already said I don't really want to miss the tourney, we wouldn't be the first to defer our pilgrimage due to some tourney or adventure, hell it wouldn't be the first time we've delayed the Pilgrims.

If the ostensiable point of this is that we are doing this to protect pilgrims their will always be more before and after that will need protecting and safe passage.

But that really just me bemoaning not getting my way so thats the last I'll speak on the pilgrimage before a related vote to it.

>I'm not sure what is left to tie up?
off the top of my head

>Who is either fraudulently or legitimately supplying mercenaries with writs for slaverly?
>Who is at the center of the slaving operation we stumbled across?
>Who is the langlishman that hired Craig to kill us, furthermore who is their master who wanted us dead?
>Is the copperclipper wealth of House Hewitt involved?
>>
>>4116058
>If the ostensiable point of this is that we are doing this to protect pilgrims their will always be more before and after that will need protecting and safe passage.


Sure that's true... but we vowed to get these specific pilgrims to the end of their journey. I get what you're saying honestly but I think it's just a difference of opinion. Hopefully we do get to partake in another tourney eventually, I loved the last one.
>>
>>4116058
Same here, I don't want to miss the tourney.
>>
>>4115972
>Whether Sir Jean Sinclair should live or die, you know that Mademoiselle Ava Sinclair will now be forever out of your reach. [Burn Lady’s Favour Re-Roll. Sir Jean Sinclair survives his wounds, but this will lead to you being forbidden from any contact with his cousin]

Welp this result is to be expected. Emile has already faced far more powerful opponents than Sinclair like the creeping horror, basilisk, Marquis Caspian, Anarchy, etc. He has went through a much stuff and so many hardships that he's basically stainless steel at this point. That's not going into the hardships that he will face in the future like a direct lighting bolt strike to test his faith.

I hope this this near death experience makes him change his outlook on life and provides a valuable life lesson to Sir Sinclair: Just because you're strong doesn't mean you're right. There's always bigger fish out there and don't be surprised when you are tormented by them with the same injustice and cruelty that you inflicted on those weaker than you.
>>
File: Pilgrims.png (31 KB, 1891x92)
31 KB
31 KB PNG
>>4116060
That is true but the agreement made said nothing about us being unable to depart from the same road as them or sojourns and places elsewhere like the tourney which would naturally lead us at odds of traveltime to them on the road.

but yes at the end of the day its a difference of opinion from fairly different standpoints of what we want.

out of curiosity if you loved the Fallavon tourney and want to partake in another one you insist on doing things the pilgrimage posthaste?
>>
>>4115972
>> Whether Sir Jean Sinclair should live or die, you know that Mademoiselle Ava Sinclair will now be forever out of your reach. [Burn Lady’s Favour Re-Roll. Sir Jean Sinclair survives his wounds, but this will lead to you being forbidden from any contact with his cousin]

I dont care whether this vote is counted or not since I just wanna make my position clear.

Sir Jean Sinclair is a wanker, but I don't wanna kill him even accidentally and I definitely dont wanna risk killing him just for a chance to continue courting Maid Sinclair. That's vile.
>>
>>4116071
The agreement was that we would escort them to the end of their pilgrimage. Not that we'd escort them half way or that we'd take them until it is inconvenient. It has been made clear more than once that if we just up and leave it will be considered breaking that agreement. Sure it's not the same as breaking a holy vow if we bail on them but it's in bad taste and seems out of character.

We can take some time off when there is something important going on of course. This has been established previously. However, I believe Forgotten once mentioned that if we were to go to this tourney it would be the end of our travels with these pilgrims. I might be mis-remembering, I would have to check, but I believe it is because the tourney is not at all on the way and the pilgrims can only be expected to wait so long. That's also ignoring that we'd be expected to pay for their lodgings etc in the mean time

>out of curiosity if you loved the Fallavon tourney and want to partake in another one you insist on doing things the pilgrimage posthaste?

Because it fits our character to do this. Another tourney will come along eventually but I don't think Emile is a gloryhound, especially after all the choices he's made. He seems pretty serious about keeping his word. We can't do both so we take the high road and keep to our word.
>>
>>4115972
> Whether Sir Jean Sinclair should live or die, you know that Mademoiselle Ava Sinclair will now be forever out of your reach. [Burn Lady’s Favour Re-Roll. Sir Jean Sinclair survives his wounds, but this will lead to you being forbidden from any contact with his cousin]

I like the redhead but seriously fuck Favallon

>>4112037
ME
>>
>>4116074
Thats fair if leaving them in bad faith would be the only recourse regarding that agreement than we can agree thats its just straight up not an option to occur except possible in the egregious of circumstances.

>Because it fits our character to do this. Another tourney will come along eventually but I don't think Emile is a gloryhound, especially after all the choices he's made. He seems pretty serious about keeping his word.

Forgive me for breaking civility slighty but this shits me up the wall with piety and Idealism being the guiding characteristic for Emille, Emille has absolutely the traits of a Gloryhound, haughtiness and heartyness play a clear role in the charcteristics of someone and Idealistically a knight should be covered in glory and honour, but thanks to Idealism and piety being really pushed we don't get much room to explore a great deal outside of that and it really gets under my skin that anything else really can not mean as much as the Idealism angle.
>>
>>4116092
>Forgive me for breaking civility slighty

Its all good man you make a valid point
>>
>>4115838
>Guarded - Exchange of Blows does not inflict or sustain damage.
>Honour demands that I cannot.
>>
>>4116094
Ignore this post, my bad
>>
>>4115972
>Whether Sir Jean Sinclair should live or die, you know that Mademoiselle Ava Sinclair will now be forever out of your reach. [Burn Lady’s Favour Re-Roll. Sir Jean Sinclair survives his wounds, but this will lead to you being forbidden from any contact with his cousin]


The chad Sir Emile the Bear, Knight of Romaine:
>Attacks a Son of Sin with a kamikaze attack leap jump under the witness of the Almighty
>So piously based he seeks to get struck by lightning as a test of his faith
>His subjects love him and will happily protect their lands
>Doesn't even need a blade to kick ass Can wreck kniggas with just a shield power bash
>Angels are literally giving him direct commands from the Almighty
>Follows his knight's code of honor like a true knight of Canton
>Brings justice down upon false knights like Vancewell
>Even the Cathagi want him to become a Dragon Guard

The virgin Sir Jean Sinclair, Knight of Fallavon:
>His subjects loathe him and he has to constantly hang them to prevent them from running to the lands of better lords
>Only good at executing runaway serfs who can't fight back
>Impotent petty blackguard. Will torment his subjects just to spite people he doesn't like
>Provides free recruits and supporters to rebels through his sheer cuntiness as a person and shittiness as a ruler
>His own views prove him wrong. Believes the strongest are right and good while the weak are wrong and pathetic then gets proven to be a weak bitch himself
>>
>>4115972
> Whether Sir Jean Sinclair should live or die, you know that Mademoiselle Ava Sinclair will now be forever out of your reach. [Burn Lady’s Favour Re-Roll. Sir Jean Sinclair survives his wounds, but this will lead to you being forbidden from any contact with his cousin]
>>
>>4115972
>Whether Sir Jean Sinclair should live or die, you know that Mademoiselle Ava Sinclair will now be forever out of your reach. [Burn Lady’s Favour Re-Roll. Sir Jean Sinclair survives his wounds, but this will lead to you being forbidden from any contact with his cousin]

'Ate Vancewell
'Ate Sinclair

Love me Rabe
Love me Norveski

Simple as
>>
>>4116100
I want see the saberface again.
>>
>>4115972
>Whether Sir Jean Sinclair should live or die, you know that Mademoiselle Ava Sinclair will now be forever out of your reach. [Burn Lady’s Favour Re-Roll. Sir Jean Sinclair survives his wounds, but this will lead to you being forbidden from any contact with his cousin]

Kniggas, I ain't voting to risk killing a fellow knight no matter how dishonourable he is just for some pussy. There's plenty of other ladies and waifus out there
>>
>>4116096
kek/10
>>
>>4116101
Considering our commitment to a maiden has effectively opened up at this point the future will be Interesting the candidates so far are interesting.

Daubney is a strong Candidate considering a large chunk of the romance will be reinstilling her with faith in Chivalry and general goodness, if we want to be big saps her and Emille are practically a heaven made match.

Rabe is sharpminded women almost certainly well suited for the Romanie enviroment though I can't say much more on her

Lady Vancewell is a dangerous game, likely she'd lead to us compromising our principles or some level of a toxic relationship though thats not without its appeal if she doesn't kill us.

Lady Fallavon is almost certainly off limits given what happened with her brother(?) also highball ambitious considering her station.

Lady Norveski is as classic a Romani woman as you can get matching independence with wit but she ran circles round us last time, if we could only match her wits we'd probably find some sport in her

Sister Aditha is sworn to the Allmighty and the church her only orthodox relationship is if we managed to become king through a damn mircale, the same really applies to Sister Ignatius.

We Crashed and burned the Tracker Jean ship trying to have it both ways

>>4116096
I may have a shitty meme to produce in the future
>>
>>4116116
>Lady Vancewell is a dangerous game, likely she'd lead to us compromising our principles or some level of a toxic relationship though thats not without its appeal if she doesn't kill us.

I'd say lady vancewell is also out of our strikezone.

Imagine being the Marquis. Get rekt'd. Then NTR'd by the same dude.

Our house would have an enemy for several lifetimes.
>>
>>4116127
You're not inncorrect, their would be some serious issues with the relationship particularly if her engagment to the marquis actually went ahead but the worst only occurs if she marries him or the relationship is discovered and given how smooth an operator she was I would say that it would be managable.

But by and large at this point she is hardly an option from a practical standpoint.
>>
>>4116096
Sir Emile Andrei, Smashing edgy cunts with his castle forged iron ballsack since thread 1
>>
>>4116058
>Really my point behind the threats we face to our soul & ethics


All the more reason to face the challenge. Also sounding like you're getting waaaay too into it. Also completely paradoxical with

> I'm against doing this entire pilgrimage immediately simply because as I've already said I don't really want to miss the tourney

Because fuck, you can't have it both ways. Also

> wants to return to innawoods instead of ho dragoning.
>>
>>4116116
You forgot

The Cathagi thot

Who wanted our body for her pleasure

To create an oasis in her desert.

D R A G O N H Y P E
>>
>>4115619
This is me.
>>
We goin straight to Cathagi
>>
Holy shit guys, what a riveting fight.

Well done, bros.
>>
>>4115884
Guse the story went on when i was sleeping.

>>4115972

> Whether Sir Jean Sinclair should live or die, you know that Mademoiselle Ava Sinclair will now be forever out of your reach. [Burn Lady’s Favour Re-Roll. Sir Jean Sinclair survives his wounds, but this will lead to you being forbidden from any contact with his cousin

Hope you all learn what happenes when you start telling other nobles how to rule there lands, such a backlash to our family's name.
>>4112761
This is me ,
dont think i voted on last one
>>
>>4115972
> Whether Sir Jean Sinclair should live or die, you know that Mademoiselle Ava Sinclair will now be forever out of your reach. [Burn Lady’s Favour Re-Roll. Sir Jean Sinclair survives his wounds, but this will lead to you being forbidden from any contact with his cousin]

I feel like this is the right choice. We fan always win her back if we get famous or wealthy enough.

Besides, it's what we deserve as a consequence.
>>
>>4115972
>Whether Sir Jean Sinclair should live or die, you know that Mademoiselle Ava Sinclair will now be forever out of your reach. [Burn Lady’s Favour Re-Roll. Sir Jean Sinclair survives his wounds, but this will lead to you being forbidden from any contact with his cousin]

Offer him a helping hand and check if he's okay.
>>
Did we just took out another important competitor for the Spring Tournament? Thank god we aren't competing or people will get really suspicious.
>>
File: Spoiler Image (486 KB, 506x715)
486 KB
486 KB PNG
>>4116116
Don't forget the greatest waifu of them all!

KNIGHTFU!
N
I
G
H
T
F
U
!
>>
>>4116426
Glorified cheerleader.
>>
>>4116432
Don't make us post it, anglo
>>
>>4116470
Post away, Frenchie.

> Glorified cheerleader hangs out for 11 months

> 20 years later the English fall into a civil war

> France "She was the Saint who saved us!"

> France never even won a Crusade.
>>
>>4116426
Redpill me on Joan of Arc, what's so cool about her?
>>
>>4116478
We've been over this already, anon! Joan is the patron saint of Sworn To Vuhlur and our knightfu
>>
>>4115972
>Perhaps you have gained the Wolf Sinclair’s newfound respect. Or perhaps he lies dead, well beyond such mortal concerns as pride or respect. [Roll for Sir Jean Sinclair’s fate (50DC). If he lives you grow closer, you may continue to court the Maid Sinclair. If he dies, well…]

Let’s leave his fate to the ALMIGHTY

>>4113479
Previous vote in case of ID change
>>
>>4116507
She's apparently Forgotten's favourite historical figure too.
>>
>>4115972
>>Perhaps you have gained the Wolf Sinclair’s newfound respect. Or perhaps he lies dead, well beyond such mortal concerns as pride or respect. [Roll for Sir Jean Sinclair’s fate (50DC). If he lives you grow closer, you may continue to court the Maid Sinclair. If he dies, well…]
>>
>>4116478
Has to be shitposting. No one is this historically illiterate especially with the last one.
>>
>>4115972
>>Perhaps you have gained the Wolf Sinclair’s newfound respect. Or perhaps he lies dead, well beyond such mortal concerns as pride or respect. [Roll for Sir Jean Sinclair’s fate (50DC). If he lives you grow closer, you may continue to court the Maid Sinclair. If he dies, well…]
>>
>>4115972
> Whether Sir Jean Sinclair should live or die, you know that Mademoiselle Ava Sinclair will now be forever out of your reach. [Burn Lady’s Favour Re-Roll. Sir Jean Sinclair survives his wounds, but this will lead to you being forbidden from any contact with his cousin]
>>
>>4115972
>> Whether Sir Jean Sinclair should live or die, you know that Mademoiselle Ava Sinclair will now be forever out of your reach. [Burn Lady’s Favour Re-Roll. Sir Jean Sinclair survives his wounds, but this will lead to you being forbidden from any contact with his cousin]

I´m okay with this. Time to RABE.
This is me.
>>4108383
>>
>>4116499
Nothing. She came and told people in New Orleans that God wanted Charles VII to win.

They managed to break the siege, but their push to reclaim France failed at Paris.

French forces allied with England (Including Charles VII mother) captured her, sold her to the English, then a court of French clergy tried her. Charles VII refused to intervene.

7 years after her death, the French guys who did this switched sides while England started the War of Roses and was unable to support their French campaign.

Also the King of England gave a bunch of land back to marry Yolande of Aragorns granddaughter and Charles VII's niece.

It was a bad decision.

Yolande of Aragorn was the real bad bitch. Took Charles VII from Court after his fathers death so that his Mother couldn't "ruin the next generation of French Kings". She picked his Court, funded his armies, started a prophecy that a maiden would lead French forces to victory, found Joan of Arc and supported her in Court to have her appointed as a General in the army, and through arranging her descendants marriages basically controlled 4 kingdoms at one time.

When Charles rule was super shaky because he was crowned by a heretic, the new Borgia Pope overturned the verdict in exchange for support in his crusade and for France forcing the current French supported Anti-pope to abdicate.

The trial was serious bullshit though.

Anyways, over 600 years of Nationalist propaganda she became an icon for French independance because they're still salty AF about getting the shit kicked out of them like they did to their colonies.
>>
>>4116571
Picking up the pieces of the Ottoman Empire after WW1 was won by America doesn't count.

>>4116596
Oh hey, it's you. Thanks for the autistic walls of text about this, but please no not again.

>>4116591
RABEFAGS ON THE WAIFU TRAIN WHOOO WHOOO!

Voting to roll is futile, it's a 50 percent chance to lose and you don't have a delusional reverse-trap cheerleader to "magically" make it pass.
>>
>>4116596
Vile lies and falsehoods. This ID is banned I’m joking, of course
>>
>>4116598
Oh you're actually historically illiterate.

The Crusades were a French endeavor through and through.

The Crusades were started by a French pope (Urban II).

The vast the majority of the crusaders and crusader leaders were French. Even the crusaders from England were French Norman knights like Richard I the Lionheart and Robert Curthose.

In fact, the rate of crusaders who were French was so high the Middle Easterners called the crusaders ''Franks'' because they thought all of them were French.

The lingua franca of the Kingdom of Jerusalem was French. Every single king of Jerusalem was French. Same thing for the all nobility and European commoners of the Kingdom of Jerusalem.

Leaders of the First Crusade:
>Raymond IV of Toulouse
>Adhemar of Le Puy
>Godfrey of Bouillon
>Baldwin of Boulogne
>Hugh I of Vermandois
>Stephen II of Blois
>Robert II of Flanders
>Peter the Hermit
>Bohemond of Taranto
>Tancerd of Hauteville
>Richard of Salerno
>Robert II of Normandy

You have no idea how historically illiterate your statement is.
>>
>>4116627
>>4116596
I have no stake in this, but can anons not use up board space to this degree, it makes navigating the thread later on very obnoxious.
>>
>>4116631
+1
>>
>>4116631
Well. At least the English had the benefit to King Arthur was a fictionalized version of a real person.

Piss-Soaked European Quebec gets super butthurt about "Muh Maid".
>>
>>4116499
Ignore the seething anon. He's been fruitlessly trying to shit on Knightfu for having the gall to liberate France from English invasion with ahistorical revisionist theories and constantly shills for Henry VI of England, a mentally ill weak loon who was one of the worst and most incompetent kings to ever rule England.

Joan of Arc is a saint and French heroine of France known for her role during the Lancastrian phase of the Hundred Years' War in which she reversed the tide in the favor of France.

The unanointed King Charles VII sent Joan to the Siege of Orléans. She gained prominence after she lifted the siege only nine days later. Several additional swift victories led to Charles VII's consecration at Reims. This long-awaited event greatly boosted French morale and paved the way for the final French victory.

No person of the Middle Ages, male or female, has been the subject of more study.

Joan of Arc came from an obscure village and rose to prominence when she was a teenager, and she did so as an uneducated peasant. The French and English kings had justified the ongoing Hundred Year's War through competing interpretations of inheritance law, first concerning Edward III's claim to the French throne and then Henry VI's. The conflict had been a legalistic feud between two related royal families, but Joan transformed it along religious lines and gave meaning to appeals such as that of squire Jean de Metz when he asked, "Must the king be driven from the kingdom; and are we to be English?" In the words of Stephen Richey, "She turned what had been a dry dynastic squabble that left the common people unmoved except for their own suffering into a passionately popular war of national liberation." Richey also expresses the breadth of her subsequent appeal:

The people who came after her in the five centuries since her death tried to make everything of her: demonic fanatic, spiritual mystic, naive and tragically ill-used tool of the powerful, creator and icon of modern popular nationalism, adored heroine, saint. She insisted, even when threatened with torture and faced with death by fire, that she was guided by voices from God. Voices or no voices, her achievements leave anyone who knows her story shaking his head in amazed wonder.

From Christine de Pizan to the present, women have looked to Joan as a positive example of a brave and active woman. She operated within a religious tradition that believed an exceptional person from any level of society might receive a divine calling.

In 1456, an inquisitorial court authorized by Pope Callixtus III examined the trial, debunked the charges against her, pronounced her innocent, and declared her a martyr. In the 16th century she became a symbol of the Catholic League, and in 1803 she was declared a national symbol of France by the decision of Napoleon Bonaparte. She was beatified in 1909 and canonized in 1920. The French civic holiday in her honour, set in 1920, is the second Sunday of May.
>>
>>4116694
> One of the worst and most incompetent kings

Only because he married a French woman and trusted her Uncle not to stab him in the back. The man did everything he could to make peace as he felt a man of Christ should do, and ended up giving back most of the territory to France.

Meanwhile Charles couldn't do jack against Burgundian nobles, or the mercenaries he used in the war being worse than Sinclair as they ravaged his own land.

He was abhorred by his own son for his weakness, and died shitting himself while refusing to let anyone near him because he was convinced they all liked his son better.

Charles VII was pretty much a tool of Yolande, who was like I said the real Boss Bitch of the world at that time. Managed to control England through her Granddaughter and control France through Charles VII.

You can copy/paste cherry picked wikipedia articles, or you can actually read the source material. There's a lot of French wanking of Joan of Arc though.
>>
Okay, we’ve already had this argument. At this stage it is no longer relevant to the quest. Please cease.
>>
>>4116746
Sorry.
>>
>>4116746
No problemo Forgotten.
>>
>>4115972
>Perhaps you have gained the Wolf Sinclair’s newfound respect. Or perhaps he lies dead, well beyond such mortal concerns as pride or respect. [Roll for Sir Jean Sinclair’s fate (50DC). If he lives you grow closer, you may continue to court the Maid Sinclair. If he dies, well…]
>>
Hay peoples iv notcied not many here have talked what going to happen with this serf.
Are we going to take him with us? Couse if Sinclair lives his still going to want to kill the serf but if he dosnt then how badly a beating is the serf going to get? As the serf still needs to have punishment for trying to run away.
Theres also narthing stoping Sinclair from waiting for us to leave then hang the serf.
So how are all you who voted for vow going to take responsibility for this serf life, since alot of you was going to let the serf die until he asked for help.
>>
>>4116938
Can you please make an effort with the orthograph and grammar
>>
>>4116938
We don't care. It was in the vote.
>>
>>4116948
What happens to the serf was in the vote? Where?

Also if you dont care what happens to the serf e.g he still gets killed then what was the point of fight then if not to ensure the serfs safety?
Kinda makes this whole shitshow pointless in the end that only hurts us and the familys name.
>>
>>4116963
Emile doesn't care.

The vote explicitly pointed that out, due to us literally being willing to let him die until he triggered the vow.

Emile doesn't give a fuck about the serf. He cares about his vows.

Besides, if we do anything to the Serf we're definitely breaking the law and turning a trial by combat into a theft.
>>
>>4115972
>> Whether Sir Jean Sinclair should live or die, you know that Mademoiselle Ava Sinclair will now be forever out of your reach. [Burn Lady’s Favour Re-Roll. Sir Jean Sinclair survives his wounds, but this will lead to you being forbidden from any contact with his cousin]
>>
>>4116938
>So how are all you who voted for vow going to take responsibility for this serf life

Yeah nah that's not how it works. He called for aid, we answered but we can't take him with us, he belongs to these lands. The trail by combat has prevented his hanging over his escape attempt. He's still guilty and deserves punishment and will have to return to his lands. We can't sit here and babysit him for the rest of his life and taking him with us would be theft
>>
>>4116970
Dosnt sound like that would be in the sprit of the vow to start a dual to stop serf from getting hanged to only walk away and let he die anyways.

At that point way even do the vow which has been talked about it possibly not even caring about the serf in the frist place as Sinclair has mentioned.

Going to be neat seeing how this all turns out.
>>
>>4116938
>>4116963
>can't take him with you as that's criminal
>can't stand guard over his lands for him
>can only encourage him to break the law and abandon his land
This is why you should have let him hang.
>>
>>4117035
What else can we do? The serf must still be punished by law, we cannot take the serf it would be illegal and would make us equally guilty of leaving his lands, and we can not live out the rest of his life watching over him. We must assume that Sir Sinclair and his people will abide by the law of Trial by Combat and spare the serfs life. We're an honourable knight and we have to assume that he is as well.

We've forced their hand, they can no longer execute the serf for this crime. If they do so it is a stain on their honour, if we act like we assume they will the moment we leave, it is a stain on our own. We've done all we can
>>
>>4117028
"The trail by combat has prevented his hanging" ,probs just prolonged it as Sinclair can just wait for us to fuck off thats if his still alive.

>>4117037
I wanted the serf to hang and not have to deal with the fallout of this dual at all, only thing i wanted was a priest to say a prayer for the serf.

I would like to talk with our priests arfter this and find out what happened was within the vow or not.
>>
>>4117072
>"The trail by combat has prevented his hanging" ,probs just prolonged it as Sinclair can just wait for us to fuck off thats if his still alive.

It's possible but if that happens then he is basically a villain who can't be trusted. We're working on the assumption here that he will uphold the same law that brings into play this trial by combat. If that's not true he is guilty of murder and any attempt to do things lawfully with him are a waste of time.

That's not really a feasible position to operate from unless we see clear evidence of this sort of behaviour
>>
>>4115972
>> Whether Sir Jean Sinclair should live or die, you know that Mademoiselle Ava Sinclair will now be forever out of your reach. [Burn Lady’s Favour Re-Roll. Sir Jean Sinclair survives his wounds, but this will lead to you being forbidden from any contact with his cousin]

Seriously. At this point, we might as well be a shieldmaster.
>>
>>4117043
They can just claim that the serf tryed to ran away again after woulds or a differnt crime they think is worth hanging the serf for or just beat his ass so hard he just dies anyways.

Though im sure our hands are tied up with the legal stuff with the serf unless the person that owns him gives the serf to us.
There is no upside to us wining at all i mean part from not dieing.

Well thats enugh of my bitching about the dual as i manly wanted see peoples views on the serf.
>>
>>4116963
We’re not taking him with us, he’s a criminal.

There was no point saving him, hence why I voted against. It was a stupid extension of our vow to now seemingly cover all criminals.

The man was guilty and tried - but because anons thought that punishment a bit hard, we had to spas out and duel Sinclair - right after telling our brother off for wanting to do just that.

I’m surprised that people don’t think we have schizophrenia, let alone ‘divine visions’
>>
>>4117127
The vote specifically called that we never cared about the serf's survival so I dont think emile would bother too hard. Just that he gets a weaker punishment.

Frankly, considering how this almost killed a knight we respect, I'm of the feeling that he will not bother too much if the men at arms 'accidentally' whip the serf to death.

Frankly, I'd rather not see his face again.
>>
>>4117127
Like someone mentioned (no I don't want to start this argument back up again), Knights aren't like modern police officers where they just abuse their power and then use their place in the system to avoid any retribution.

Knights have a code of honor to live by, and as of right now, we don't have any reason to believe that Sinclair is such a Blackguard that he would lie through his teeth to get this serf killed, after honestly fighting and losing in what's supposed to be a trial where the Almighty themself honors whoever is just with victory.

Unless Sinclair is a right bastard, he's going to give this peasant a whipping and send him back to work. Sure, we can't give this serf a happy life, but we can prevent his death, which is enough of a boon for now. Emile can't save everyone in the world (yet), we just need to help whoever we can, when we can.
>>
>>4117136
Thats pretty much my thoughts on this whole matter, can we not go anywhere near a town that has a jail??

This wouldn't be so bad if the angel told us to do this.
>>
>>4117148
> Knights aren't like modern police officers where they just abuse their power and then use their place in the system to avoid any retribution.

I can't describe how wrong this statement is.
>>
> All these points based on the assumption that Sinclair is going to live.

He's gonna die, and the serf is gonna die for his role in Sinclairs death, fo' sho'.

IDGAF about peasants though.
>>
>>4117148
Ummm people in power lie and abuse power all the time even though theres laws/ codes thats ment to stop the abuse of power.

Kinghts can go bad just like cops, as the codes and laws only work if people chose to follow them.

Serf could do something eils when we leave which would give Sinclair legal right to hang the serf again e.g trys to run again.
now i dont think itl happen right away but we know his spitefull as fuck so who knows.
Sinclair could just beat the serf hard enguh that he becomes crippled and dies that way, there you go vow upheald as the serf didnt die right then in front of us, high 5s all around.

But yes lets not start up a big thing again, im going to log off for tonight to stop myself from carrying on.

Good luck to you all and try not to make us get on the most wanted list and hated by all nobles.
Also miss rabe is best.
>>
>>4116229
>Innawoods
>Tourney of the decade

Romanie or Aubreys will be hosting it for certain

>>4116232
I mean she'd be one step above a peasant and likely cause our parents to have a fit but dat F O R E I G N T H O T

>>4116426
Imagine thinking that a woman can be a knight!
>>
>>4115980
Hey forgotten, even if we burn the reroll, will our relationship with Sir Sinclair be improved?
>>
>>4117207
Hey, she's genuine nobility. That's like, a step above peasant.

But also a (current) heathen so we would have to convert her. With hot dickings.

>>4117203
Just gonna point out that Sinclair was legally allowed to execute the serf for his crimes, it wasn't an abuse of power. At least it's actually illegal when Cops kill people for running away, even when they don't get punished for it.

Sinclair wouldn't have had to lie or anything.

Rules of honour really only applied to nobility. Google Chevauchée. Sieges were waged to intentionally trap peasants and non-combatants to deplete resources. Peasants were slaughtered on the battlefield while Knights and Nobles were held hostage.

The belief of knights being oh so honourable is reminiscent of Worfs views on honour, that it turns out Klingon society didn't share and that he had created this idealized perception because he never actually experienced Klingon culture. It's also the process that makes so many 2nd and 3rd gen immigrants into terrorists because they idealize the shitholes their parents fled from.

Don't turn Emile into Worf. Worf fucking sucks, and jobs all the time.
>>
>>4117228

On the one hand, this is turning into walls of text again.

On the other hand, dead on about Worf.

More importantly though, regarding Cathagi Thots - does it count as violating our vows if we don't lay with a human woman?
>>
>>4117228
She's soldier caste not nobility or am I missing something? Either way a few barriers to cross before she's an option.

Shieldmaster talent when?
>>
>>4117298
I mean, she had a writ of recommendation so she clearly has significant status.

More importantly, pretty sure we got Shieldmaster when we wrecked Sinclair with our shield.

> Sir Sinclair has learnt all-too-late that you have a style of your own, and overwhelming force is no less a threat just because it no longer wields a blade.
>>
>>4117308
We really should just get a shield combat feat at some point
>>
>>4117322
> Retain Blademaster bonus when disarmed.

Seems about right, especially since we seem to get disarmed. A lot.
>>
>>4117341
>>4117322
Also, if we upgrade to a Bastard Sword then if we lose our shield we can two-hand it, making us retain a significant amount of combat readiness.
>>
>>4117344
Nah we should go the other way, get a bigger shield so when we loose it we can two hand it.
>>
>>4117348
Emile is YUUUGE after all.

Why not both?
>>
>>4117348
Emile is YUUUGE after all.

Why not both?

Or go full final form?
>>
>>4117359
>be shield you wish too see in the world
>>
>>4117348
>not getting a donutsteel tier shield that returns when thrown
>>
>>4117377
We had our chance for that with the Fae.

Instead we gave it away to get Jess as a companion.

We're totally gonna be irresistable to the Dragon. Rarity value.
>>
>>4117429

Reminder that the Dragon is the God-King of Cathagi. For people worried about war between Cathagi and Canton, one of the best ways to avoid it would be to have the Dragon like us enough to prevent war.

He is whimsical and his slightest wish is their command, after all.

Being able to command a wrecker of men like Emile who travels with an Outcast Fae companion and honestly does ridiculous shit would probably entertain the Dragon enough that he would be willing to just sit back and see how much shit we can get ourselves into.

Especially with the contradiction of Emiles idealism and his actions, wrecking Knights of the Realm and traveling with a Foe on a pilgrimage.
>>
>>4115948
I just want to say I reread this and feel it's an underrated comment.
>>
>>4117447
>For people worried about war between Cathagi and Canton
Haven’t we won that war (aka crusade) every time?
>>
>>4117495
I wasn't the one bringing it up, but some people are trying to dragonblock us by claiming it could happen.
>>
>>4117495
Yeah the crusades adamant or at least the first one was a complete stomp of Carthaggi that ended in the death of the Carthaggi vizier and his allies that wanted to rebuild the Carthaggi empire.

>>4117521
It's cute you even think me voicing my doubts about the Dragon guard could ever cockblock you from your dragon waifu.

The Dragon may be a god king but he hasn't stopped conflict with Canton before and theirs no reason to say he will again, even if he even does like us, you put far too much credit on the idea that Emile could stop such a thing from happening by cuddlling up to the Dragon.
>>
>>4115972

>Perhaps you have gained the Wolf Sinclair’s newfound respect. Or perhaps he lies dead, well beyond such mortal concerns as pride or respect. [Roll for Sir Jean Sinclair’s fate (50DC). If he lives you grow closer, you may continue to court the Maid Sinclair. If he dies, well…]

Well things turned out pretty well I have to say.
>>
>>4117551
The Dragon casually mentioned an interest in rare Canton animals and all the Cathagi moved to make it happen. Their entire government is based around pleasing his whims.

Pretty sure that while we're in favour it will be bad news to drive us away by creating conflict with Canton, and from how Emile has developed into such a weird and hilariously contradictory character I'm pretty confident the Dragon will be tickled pink to have such a unique Dragon Guard.

> So after you let a Fae Outcast join you to oay back a life debt, you risked a lightning strike as penance for consorting with the Foe?

> No, that was for something else unrelated that made me need to reaffirm my faith.

> Laughing Dragon.

Seriously, the Dragon is immortal and old as fuck. Someone as entertaining as Emile is bound to get his attention.
>>
>>4116938
>>4116963
>>4117035
>>4117072
>>4117127
>>4117136
>>4117140
This serf is no longer a criminal after this trial by combat. Jean is both legally and honour bound to leave him be. He'll be committing murder and violating the result of a sacred legal trial by combat if he doesn't. It would put a permanent stain on him and his house. Their word will become worthless and they'll no longer be trusted. That's not even going into the legal ramifications that violating a trial by combat will result in. It's simply not worth it for them. At that point their foes can invade their lands and all of their subjects will support their foes. House Sinclair and their lands will become impoverished if they lose most of their subjects.

>>4117203
The serf isn't gonna give Jean a legal justification to kill him by running away again or anything else. He knows that he was incredibly fortunate here and that there won't be anyone to aid him next time.
>>
>>4117615
>This serf is no longer a criminal after this trial by combat.

I don't think that's how this works. I'm pretty sure it just means that Sir Sinclair can't administer the death penalty for his current crimes. He's still a criminal and should still be punished I believe
>>
>>4117617
Which doesn't matter because Emile made sure to set the terms of what the punishment will be if he won.

>“Give me your word that this man shall suffer a lesser sentence for his crimes, one without death or disfigurement. A flogging, ten strokes, as it is in the lands of my father. If you cannot, then I must insist on a trial by combat.”

My point still stands.
>>
>>4117621
I mean... if your point was that he wont be a criminal after the trial by combat... you're wrong. So it does matter. He wont be put to death obviously but he'll still need to be punished by House Sinclair. I wasn't addressing anything else in your post above, just that the outcome of the trial by combat doesn't stop the serf from being a criminal
>>
>>4117627
My point is that he'll no longer be a criminal after the trial by combat and the sentence is delivered.
>>
>>4117629
Ok that's fair enough, I agree that once the sentence is carried out he'll be free to get back to his life
>>
Did the QM say no update tonight? I lied
>>
>>4117713
Can't wait
>>
> Whether Sir Jean Sinclair should live or die, you know that Mademoiselle Ava Sinclair will now be forever out of your reach. [Burn Lady’s Favour Re-Roll. Sir Jean Sinclair survives his wounds, but this will lead to you being forbidden from any contact with his cousin]
> Lady’s Favour (Mademoiselle Ava Sinclair) Removed

You dismount and approach as the Sinclair men-at-arms crowd around the defeated Sir Jean Sinclair. He does not appear to be moving and none can so far stir him.

“Take the token you carry by your breast and lay it upon him.” The voice of the Angel is, as always, incandescent and rapturous. No one else reacts, their attention entirely on the fallen knight. “To be with this Maiden that you hold fair in your heart is not your fate. Your destiny lies elsewhere.”.

Mademoiselle’s green-black chequered handkerchief is grimy with the sweat and toil of many weeks of hard travel and combat, memories of her softness and demure admiration have comforted you often in darker hours.

“So be it.” You are surprised by the tinge of pain in your voice as you comply with the Angel’s wishes. You were fond of the fiery-haired maiden, and honoured to have earnt her affection.

The moment that the piece of cloth lands on the chest plate of Sir Sinclair he stirs sluggishly and his attendants breathe a sigh of relief. As if you needed any reassurance that the Almighty’s host can work miracles. You are also glad, for all your disagreement with Sir Sinclair he is an accomplished knight and you have no desire to have his life on your conscience over something like this.

[1/2]
>>
>>4117715
Ah shit, I'm going to need a moment. I was the Anon with a thing for redheads...
>>
File: Hat in hand.png (227 KB, 298x463)
227 KB
227 KB PNG
[2/2]

Sir Sinclair suffers no lasting injuries, other than a magnificently bruised welt across the left side of his face swelling up before your very eyes. You also overhear one of the older men-at-arms asking Sir Sinclair to recall the date and him being unable to answer confidently. You must have knocked more than just wind from him, but the concussion shouldn’t be permanent.

“You fought well, Sir Sinclair.” You begin, the man discarding the ribbon in the dirt as he rises in foul temper.

“Don’t patronise me, Romani. The day belongs to you, and the peasant is yours to do with as you see fit.” Sir Sinclair spits out another gob of blood, this time with a chip of a tooth in there. “If I ever see that disloyal dog again I’m likely to kill him myself. You are hereby banished, cur. There, a punishment he wanted anyway. I bite my thumb at thee, sirs, and wish you all a long ride off a short cliff. Good day.”

“Bless yous, sir knight, bless yous!” The serf grovels at your feets as the Sinclair force departs. “I couldn’t bear it no more. An’ after Bessie went back to the mud there weren’t nothing left for me there. Wot… wot do I do now?”

-----------------------------------------

> “Stay. Go. I care not. Just get out of my way.” You somewhat resent the grovelling peasant for involving you in this affair. If the priest and nun want him to join the pilgrimage that is their business. [Haughty]

> “Go wherever you intended when you first ran away. If you’ve even thought that far ahead.” You can’t take on every unprepared beggar that asks. And he’s also demonstrated his willingness to abandon his duties. [Hearty]

> “I am sure we can find a place for you here. At least until we reach Port Bounty.” Another mouth to feed, and likely without any particularly useful skills for long travel. But taking him under your wing is the charitable thing to do. [Idealist]
>>
>>4117720
>> “Stay. Go. I care not. Just get out of my way.” You somewhat resent the grovelling peasant for involving you in this affair. If the priest and nun want him to join the pilgrimage that is their business. [Haughty]
>>
>>4117720
>> “I am sure we can find a place for you here. At least until we reach Port Bounty.” Another mouth to feed, and likely without any particularly useful skills for long travel. But taking him under your wing is the charitable thing to do. [Idealist]

Do I hear man servant?
>>
>>4117715
Thanks based Angelbros

>>4117720
>“I am sure we can find a place for you here. At least until we reach Port Bounty.” Another mouth to feed, and likely without any particularly useful skills for long travel. But taking him under your wing is the charitable thing to do. [Idealist]
>>
>>4117720
>“I am sure we can find a place for you here. At least until we reach Port Bounty.” Another mouth to feed, and likely without any particularly useful skills for long travel. But taking him under your wing is the charitable thing to do. [Idealist]

Is he free from serfdom now or did he become Sir Emile's.
>>
>>4117720
Write in

>I fought for your life but the outcome was decided by the Almighty. Join the pilgrimage, dedicate yourself to a life of service among the men and women of the cloth and live a better life than you would have [Haughty + Idealist]

Or just Haughty, I can't decide

It's basically the idealist option but reflects that we would have let things take their course had he not asked for aid. Emile has always seen himself as above the peasantry
>>
>>4117720
> “Stay. Go. I care not. Just get out of my way.” You somewhat resent the grovelling peasant for involving you in this affair. If the priest and nun want him to join the pilgrimage that is their business. [Haughty]
Don't mind me, just a little resentful of what could have been.
>>
>>4117727
Forgot to put a question mark at the end.
>>
>>4117730
I can't decide what this would be*
>>
>>4117727
I think he's a freeman at this point? Im not entirely sure
>>
>>4117720
>>4117730
I like this.

I hold plenty of illwill for him causing this incident and this at least is a little better than outright telling him to frak off.
>>
>>4117720
>> “Stay. Go. I care not. Just get out of my way.” You somewhat resent the grovelling peasant for involving you in this affair. If the priest and nun want him to join the pilgrimage that is their business. [Haughty]

So we would've grown closer as friends with Sinclair only if we didn't burn the Lady's Favour?
>>
>>4117720
>> “Go wherever you intended when you first ran away. If you’ve even thought that far ahead.” You can’t take on every unprepared beggar that asks. And he’s also demonstrated his willingness to abandon his duties. [Hearty]
>>
>>4117720
>>4117720
>“I am sure we can find a place for you here. At least until we reach Port Bounty.” Another mouth to feed, and likely without any particularly useful skills for long travel. But taking him under your wing is the charitable thing to do. [Idealist]

>>4117730
Support.
>>
>>4117730
well we stuck our foot in shit we may as well make the best of this man as we can,f we leave this man here to his own devices he'll be a woodland scavenger at best and a bluejay/bandit at worst.

If he joins the Caravan he'll be safe among the others as long as we can protect them, but we have the opportunity here to gain a loyal servant as long as we can find an apt job for and it'd be remiss to dimiss it simply to excercise our frustration at the situation and his prospects will be better than anything he could earn elsewhere as a freeman.
>>
>>4117730
+1

If not enough support then
>>4117720
>“I am sure we can find a place for you here. At least until we reach Port Bounty.” Another mouth to feed, and likely without any particularly useful skills for long travel. But taking him under your wing is the charitable thing to do. [Idealist]
>>
>>4117720
>“Stay. Go. I care not. Just get out of my way.” You somewhat resent the grovelling peasant for involving you in this affair. If the priest and nun want him to join the pilgrimage that is their business. [Haughty]
>>
>>4117744
I don't know that we have the time, skill or wealth to train up yet another follower from scratch. At least Mikail comes pre-packaged with basic knightly skills. And then we've got that other guy who had combat experience (it seems). This guy is a farmer, and not a well off one it would seem. I'm not sure what purpose he would serve outside of eating our food.

My write in though was just an attempt to capture Emiles mood and personality. That idealism he strives for but also the frustration, maybe sadness (at burning a bridge to Maid Sinclair) and definitely haughtiness in dealing with peasants
>>
>The whole scenario was just 4gotten scheming to rid us of lady sinclair
Welp! Too bad redheadfags! Looks like we're heading straight to Rabetown
>>
>>4117730
+1
>>
>>4117749
I'm not talking as a companion but a civilian servant, we wouldn't even have to be training, it could be as simple as doing our laundry, carrying this or that or any number menial jobs that would lighten the load of ourselves or our squire and companions.

I really dig your write-in but I just see that further good could be done by us rather than telling him to join the Pilgrims.
>>
>>4117720
> “Stay. Go. I care not. Just get out of my way.” You somewhat resent the grovelling peasant for involving you in this affair. If the priest and nun want him to join the pilgrimage that is their business. [Haughty]
>>
>>4117750
Toot toot, Rabetrain
>>4117720
>[Haughty]
Moving on.
>>
>>4117758
Fair enough, I appreciate the compliment. I obviously misunderstood, I was thinking you meant to train him up for an important role
>>
>>4117720
>“I am sure we can find a place for you here. At least until we reach Port Bounty.” Another mouth to feed, and likely without any particularly useful skills for long travel. But taking him under your wing is the charitable thing to do. [Idealist]

>>4117730
Giving my support to this too. He can become a cleric like a monk and it fits pious Emile
>>
>>4117720
>Idealist

>>4117730
Support

He's been released from serfdom now meaning he can do and go whatever he wants. Better to have him live an honest life as a man of the Almighty than let him wander off to join a Bluejay group.
>>
>>4117750
>>4117760
>tfw you just want to make Daubney smile
>>
>>4117730
+1
>>
>>4117769
A good choice too
>>
>>4117730
Voting to support this
>>
>>4117720
Supporting this >>4117730
>>
>>4117730
+1
>>
>>4117744
We've accumulated enough of a freak show as it is already, we don't need to add a runaway peasant to it
>>4117730
Voting for this, why not
>>
>>4117730
Voting to support this

>>4117769
...and also this. WE NEED TO SHOW THE WOMAN HOW TO LOVE AGAIN
>>
>>4117769
Honestly? Same.
>>
>>4117720
>>4117730
This. The less I see of his face, the better.
>>
>>4117720
> “Stay. Go. I care not. Just get out of my way.” You somewhat resent the grovelling peasant for involving you in this affair. If the priest and nun want him to join the pilgrimage that is their business. [Haughty]

I feel like Emile is rightfully pissed.

>>4117719
All aboard the Rabe Train!
>>
>>4117719
Im sure that there will be other red heads for you.
>>
>>4117720
>> “I am sure we can find a place for you here. At least until we reach Port Bounty.” Another mouth to feed, and likely without any particularly useful skills for long travel. But taking him under your wing is the charitable thing to do. [Idealist]

Seems the only human thing to do.
>>
>>4117720

> “I am sure we can find a place for you here. At least until we reach Port Bounty.” Another mouth to feed, and likely without any particularly useful skills for long travel. But taking him under your wing is the charitable thing to do. [Idealist

Now its time to take responsibility for this serf after all this bullshit, lest someone can look after the animals.

>>4116384
This is me.
>>
>>4117730
Changing my vote ( >>4117978 ) for this perfect write-in : >>4117730
>>
>>4117720
Fuck, forgot to quote Forgotten : >>4117982
>>
>>4117973
I'll change my vote to >>4117730 as well.

> Have a serf as a servant

Our social rolls can't take that hit. Also we're starting to get a big crew, we don't have the coin for that.

We need some motherfucking land, or more investments, if we're going to eventually bankroll larger forces. Sustainable income.
>>
>>4117730
>>4117720
>I fought for your life but the outcome was decided by the Almighty. Join the pilgrimage, dedicate yourself to a life of service among the men and women of the cloth and live a better life than you would have [Haughty + Idealist]

can't be our responsibility, but maybe he can be useful to the church. as other anons have said, we have enough on our plate.
>>
>>4117730
>>4117720
Support. Let's set him up with Father Towbray though.
>>
>>4118050
>>4117228
This is me. FFS rural internet is shit.
>>
>>4118026
We don't need coin for our companions. They have their own coin. Damien, Sir Marcel, Sir Neil dan Marc, and Orin all have their own wealth that can sustain them just fine. It's only Mikail and Jess who Emile has a financial responsibility to provide for as he's their guardian. Emile isn't the only one who has wealth in the world.
>>
>>4118061
dan Marc is a broke Knigga. Orin is a broke peasant. Jess is a broke Fae. Damien and Marcel are traveling with us temporarily.

As we get involved in larger events, we'll need more people under us if we want to actually be able to affect outcomes.
>>
>>4118076
Sir Neil dan Marc isn't broke and neither is Orin.

Sir Neil dan Marc is an impoverished knight, but still not broke. He can sustain himself with his own coin no problem.

Same thing for Orin. He wouldn't been able to survive if he couldn't provide for himself before he met Emile.

Mikail and Jess are a different story though. Emile has to take care of them and provide for them as their guardian parent. However, I don't think the coin needed to sustain them is anywhere near enough to have a substantial effect on Emile's wealth. They're not exactly demanding financially. Jess survived on her own in the wild since she was a little child.
>>
>>4117730
Supporting this.

>>4116512
Previous vote in case of ID change
>>
>>4117750
In befor rabe has red bush
>>
>>4118097
NDM didn't even have 1 wealth to pay his forfeit in the tourney.
>>
>>4117720
> “Go wherever you intended when you first ran away. If you’ve even thought that far ahead.” You can’t take on every unprepared beggar that asks. And he’s also demonstrated his willingness to abandon his duties. [Hearty]
Man, I wasn't there for either the fight or the choice. Feels bad kniggas. I dig redheads so much. Still, was an epic fight. I'd have voted for not burning it and having a chance to get on his good side.
Anyhoos, this choice is the most sound one. We don't care for this escaped serf, he won't care about us.

>>4110485
me
>>
File: 1547410814395.jpg (250 KB, 1000x1600)
250 KB
250 KB JPG
>>4117730
Changing my vote to this, an excellent take!

This is me
>>4118543
>>
welp lost the red head, now who do we court?
>>
>>4118647
Court the widow
>>
>>4118653
Think I prefer Rabe's sister.
>>
>>4118647
Lady Rabe. The best part is we are less likely to accidentally kill any of her family.

Less likely.
>>
>>4118647
Lady Daubney
>>
>>4118660
don't go jinxing us now.
>>
lady daubney is my choice also i wonder how our next meeting with lady sinclair will go do you think she felt something when we cut that thread of fate
>>
>>4118667
No, a Jinx would be saying there's no way we could get in a position where we accidentally Emile a Knight from her family.

Also, Emile is now a verb for when you beat a man within an inch of death during a duel.
>>
File: igor-bogdanoff.jpg (30 KB, 500x500)
30 KB
30 KB JPG
"He fought?"
"Uncage the Bear."
>>
>>4117720
>>4117730
I'll support this write-in
>>
>>4118647
Lady Vancewell

It would be an absolute spectacle
>>
>>4118858
>their isn't even a word spoken between the two of them
>it's just Emille messing up her intrigues in the most hammed ways possible
>>
>>4118873
So. Business as normal, then?
>>
I would unironically vote to court Lady Vancewell if she wasn't betrothed to Marquis Fallavon. She's great at intrigue just like mother Andrei and is the sole heiress of all the Vancewell lands. Plus she's hot as hell. But since she's already engaged I'm going with Daubney. We have to restore her faith and hope in chivalry!
>>
>>4119348
Bro they ain’t betrothed they just courting each other.

I swear this sounds like a kino matchup: A 500 IQ cutthroat lady and a 2 IQ heart of gold gigachad knight.
Sign me up
>>4118873
>Vancewell: I’ll send some rogues to sow discontent among the populace of a rival house, distracting them from my political maneuvers while weakening their grip on their land.
>Emile: “sup m’lady. I just got back from smiting some rogues”
>Vancewell: (oh shit. Did he discover my plot?) “oh, that’s interesting... why did you do that?”
>Emile: yeah those guys said some mean stuff to some orphans so I had to (cracks knuckles) introduce them to my knightly values
>Vancewell: (did this idiot seriously foil my plans over some orphans?)
>Vancewell: ...
>(oh no)
>(why do I find that hot?)
>>
>>4119449
Lady Rabe is all that and also not evil.

As evil.

Okay, at least she isn't on an opposite side from us.
>>
>>4119468
>not wanting to alignment change someone to good with emilies "Holy Sword"
>>
>>4119471
I'd rather we go with someone we could introduce to Mom.
>>
>>4117720
>>4117730
>I fought for your life but the outcome was decided by the Almighty. Join the pilgrimage, dedicate yourself to a life of service among the men and women of the cloth and live a better life than you would have [Haughty + Idealist]

>>4115891
>>4114090
Me
>>
>>4119468
I hesitate to call lady Vancewell evil, mainly because we lack any insight into who she is or what motivates her, she could very well be in contrast to her brother or she could entirely be of a worse mould.

For now she remains distant if we cannot pierce that frosty exterior.

>>4119348
They aren't strictly engaged but cleary where at the intial stages of courtship.

also now I want to stick up our nose in her buisness
>>
>I fought for your life but the outcome was decided by the Almighty. Join the pilgrimage, dedicate yourself to a life of service among the men and women of the cloth and live a better life than you would have [Haughty + Idealist]

“I fought for your life but the outcome was decided by the Almighty. Join the pilgrimage, dedicate yourself to a life of service among the men and women of the cloth and live a better life than you would have.” Right Makes Might are the words of your house, and there is perhaps no clearer example of that than a trial by combat. This peasant’s life is not his own anymore than your life is yours. Both of you are tools of the Almighty, great and small.

“Yes milord, of course. Heaven bless ye!” The serf continues to kowtow, but you have already remounted and spurred Hannibal on.

You spare a glance to the retreating Sinclair patrol and wonder at what might have been. You will miss Ava’s shy smile and charming freckles.

But a Knight is Sworn to Valour.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3uT7tEayUwk – Fallavon folk song

[1/3]
>>
File: Forest Roads.gif (2.96 MB, 400x300)
2.96 MB
2.96 MB GIF
Fenegan, 21st Day of Novrimun, 883 A.C.E. – Far West Fallavon roads

It has been four days since your encounter with Sir Jean Sinclair at the crossroads, time enough for the shadow that had hung over you since to lift somewhat. The jests and revelry with your fellow nights is a welcome distraction,

“The town of Darbyshire is not far, but a day’s travel off the main road.” Sir dan Marc suggests a day or two break after two weeks travel on the road.

“No offence to your home Duchy, Sir dan Marc, but I’d sooner be clear of these forests.” It goes unsaid that your time in Fallavon has been… trying. You used to genuinely enjoy taking in the lush green scenery, but you have honestly had your fill of trees and nature.

“As you wish, sire. It’s getting dark anyway.” Your sworn man shrugs with a whimsical look on his face. “I wonder if they’ve caught anything for tonight. Some venison would be a nice treat…”

By ‘they’ Sir dan Marc is referring to Brother Rousseau and Jess the Kid, who seem to have bonded in the mutual silence these last few weeks. Although you all take turns at hunting and foraging depending on station, it only appears to be those two that catch anything more satisfying then wandering hare or pheasant with any regularity. Kid’s prowess as a hunter comes as a bit of a surprise. You knew she had fended for herself for Almighty knows how long outside of the Fae Enclaves, but you had suspected that one of her type would find the whole carnivore habit abhorrent. Or perhaps not, you have no reason to believe the Fae genuinely subsist solely on roots and berries.

[2/3]
>>
[3/3]

You drop back to the rear of the convoy to see if they have returned from their hunt. The fact that they haven’t left at all is a concern. Jess the Kid cocks her head at you, and Brother Rousseau gestures that you should join them in a carefully nonchalant manner. He inclines his head to a clearing between the trees, a grassy ridge to the north-west. It takes you a while to spot the figure, holding back in the treeline. If you didn’t know you were looking for something you’d have never have spotted him. Almighty bless those sharp Fae eyes, a blessing you find ironic given the orthodoxia contrast.

“That’s not one of Sinclair’s men.” You murmur, at least you don’t think so. Brother Rousseau nods in agreement. “You’ve seen him before? How many times?”

Brother Rousseau holds up three fingers, an uneasy feeling sinks in your gut. You don’t like this. An outrider or traveller wishing to pass unnoticed you would dismiss out of hand, seeing them twice could be pure coincidence. But thrice? They’re keeping pace with the convoy, watching you.

And you can think of few pleasant explanations for doing so.

--------------------------------------------------------------------

>“Let’s ask our shadow some questions. Hyah!” If you want answers you will need to ask them, directly. Against the living, captured scout is an entrée to victory. Father taught you that. [Haughty]

>”I’ll keep his attention here. Double back and keep your distance, but don’t lose sight of him. See if we can’t follow him when he reports back.” If he is scouting, he is scouting for someone. [Hearty]

>”Perhaps we should camp up at the town Sir dan Marc mentioned. Let the peasants rest up.” And give your party time to ask around about brigands. Or conduct some scouting yourself. [Idealist]
>>
>>4119561
>“Let’s ask our shadow some questions. Hyah!” If you want answers you will need to ask them, directly. Against the living, captured scout is an entrée to victory. Father taught you that. [Haughty]
>>
>>4119561
>>“Let’s ask our shadow some questions. Hyah!” If you want answers you will need to ask them, directly. Against the living, captured scout is an entrée to victory. Father taught you that. [Haughty]
>>
>>4115445
I completely forgot to reply to this.

That is a long list, certainly! I'll narrow it to the top three.

-House Andrei family portrait (not a scene, I know. Sue me.)
-Emile's battle against the Son of Sin, ANARCHY
-Sword lessons with Mikail

This quest has been full of other gems I'd love to see put to paper one day but those are the ones that first occur to me.
>>
>>4119561
>>”I’ll keep his attention here. Double back and keep your distance, but don’t lose sight of him. See if we can’t follow him when he reports back.” If he is scouting, he is scouting for someone. [Hearty]
no use a spy with no master
ive played enough M&B to know i have to catch both
>>
>>4119570
>-Sword lessons with Mikail

That's wholesome as fuck
>>
>>4119561
>>”I’ll keep his attention here. Double back and keep your distance, but don’t lose sight of him. See if we can’t follow him when he reports back.” If he is scouting, he is scouting for someone. [Hearty]
>>
>>4119561
>>“Let’s ask our shadow some questions. Hyah!” If you want answers you will need to ask them, directly. Against the living, captured scout is an entrée to victory. Father taught you that. [Haughty]
>>
File: IMG_1428.jpg (115 KB, 766x1000)
115 KB
115 KB JPG
>>4119570
>-Emile's battle against the Son of Sin, ANARCHY

Dynamic Entry is best scene all I see is pic related.
>>
>>4119561
>“Let’s ask our shadow some questions. Hyah!” If you want answers you will need to ask them, directly. Against the living, captured scout is an entrée to victory. Father taught you that. [Haughty]
>>
>>4119561
>>”I’ll keep his attention here. Double back and keep your distance, but don’t lose sight of him. See if we can’t follow him when he reports back.” If he is scouting, he is scouting for someone. [Hearty]
>>
>>4119561
>>“Let’s ask our shadow some questions. Hyah!” If you want answers you will need to ask them, directly. Against the living, captured scout is an entrée to victory. Father taught you that. [Haughty]
>>
>>4119561
>”I’ll keep his attention here. Double back and keep your distance, but don’t lose sight of him. See if we can’t follow him when he reports back.” If he is scouting, he is scouting for someone. [Hearty]
We followed quarry into the woods once ahorse - it didn't turn out well for us
>>
>>4119561
>“Let’s ask our shadow some questions. Hyah!” If you want answers you will need to ask them, directly. Against the living, captured scout is an entrée to victory. Father taught you that. [Haughty]
>>
>>4119513
Me
>>
>>4119561
>”I’ll keep his attention here. Double back and keep your distance, but don’t lose sight of him. See if we can’t follow him when he reports back.” If he is scouting, he is scouting for someone. [Hearty]
>>
>>4119561
>“Let’s ask our shadow some questions. Hyah!” If you want answers you will need to ask them, directly. Against the living, captured scout is an entrée to victory. Father taught you that. [Haughty]
>>
>>4119561
>”I’ll keep his attention here. Double back and keep your distance, but don’t lose sight of him. See if we can’t follow him when he reports back.” If he is scouting, he is scouting for someone. [Hearty]

If we capture him then whoever he's scouting for will realize that they have been compromised when they dont come back
>>
>>4119561
>“Let’s ask our shadow some questions. Hyah!” If you want answers you will need to ask them, directly. Against the living, captured scout is an entrée to victory. Father taught you that. [Haughty]

They must be real desperate if they're bandits. Attacking a convoy of poor pilgrims that are guarded by a small skirmish-tier level size army of Knights Comitas is dangerous and will produce little material gain for them.
>>
wow another mc on qst that is bad with the opposite sex no way how could this happen on the guide of Anon
>>
>>4119561
>”I’ll keep his attention here. Double back and keep your distance, but don’t lose sight of him. See if we can’t follow him when he reports back.” If he is scouting, he is scouting for someone. [Hearty]

>>4119683
I think they were planning on ambushing us with a suprise night raid attack since since direct battle wouldn't be to their advantage. Thank God for Jessica's ranger skills and keen senses. It's like when she sensed the basilisk coming before it was even close.
>>
>>4119684
hehe... guys check my epic write-in which will totally win us the chick's heart. It will not backfire disastrously
>>
>>4119561

>”I’ll keep his attention here. Double back and keep your distance, but don’t lose sight of him. See if we can’t follow him when he reports back.” If he is scouting, he is scouting for someone. [Hearty]
>>
>>4119561
>>4119561
>”I’ll keep his attention here. Double back and keep your distance, but don’t lose sight of him. See if we can’t follow him when he reports back.” If he is scouting, he is scouting for someone. [Hearty]
>>
>>4119561
>>”I’ll keep his attention here. Double back and keep your distance, but don’t lose sight of him. See if we can’t follow him when he reports back.” If he is scouting, he is scouting for someone. [Hearty]
>>
>>4119683
Or someone is trying to assassinate us again.
>>
>>4119700
yeah guys let's go to win this waifu heart it not like we are gonna totally ruin this with our actions like they said the 20th times the charm :^)
>>
>>4119561
>”Perhaps we should camp up at the town Sir dan Marc mentioned. Let the peasants rest up.” And give your party time to ask around about brigands. Or conduct some scouting yourself. [Idealist
Time to meet some towns peoples in this nice place
>>4117980
This is me
>>
>>4119561
>”I’ll keep his attention here. Double back and keep your distance, but don’t lose sight of him. See if we can’t follow him when he reports back.” If he is scouting, he is scouting for someone. [Hearty]
>>
>>4119561
>“Let’s ask our shadow some questions. Hyah!” If you want answers you will need to ask them, directly. Against the living, captured scout is an entrée to victory. Father taught you that. [Haughty]
>>
>>4119684
You don't realise it but all of this was calculated. Only reason we chosen Ava Sinclair was to min-max our chances of survival in the forest. Even encounter with her cousin? as we were leaving was predicted because of curse Forgotten wouldn't let us leave without interacting with Sinclairs, so we all knew we will have ocasion to dumb that usless stat boost before we leave Favallon...
Totally...
*sniff*... I-Im not sad... *sniff*
NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!
WHY!!!! YOU FUCKERS HAD TO DO IT!!! WHY!!!!!!!!!
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!!
MY SHY REDHEAD FRECKLED WAIFU!!!!!!
>>
>>4119943
Who needs her.
I was always more fond of short spunky blackhaired maiden anyway!
Though it might be a bit awkward if we just up and start dating on of Sinclairs friends.
>>
>>4119956
Just tell her the truth angel told us to do it
>>
>>4119961
That's how you get burned at the stake as a heretic.

> JoanOfArcMemes.jpg
>>
>>4119956
>implying you will not fuck that relationship also
21th time the charm eh Anon you always find a way
>>
File: FB_IMG_1475245414654.jpg (56 KB, 600x600)
56 KB
56 KB JPG
>>4119561
>“Let’s ask our shadow some questions. Hyah!” If you want answers you will need to ask them, directly. Against the living, captured scout is an entrée to victory. Father taught you that. [Haughty]
Seems like the best route. If they try and hide, maybe Jess can track them in their hurry. If they don't we can have a nice civil talk, that can wield a lot of information.
>>
>>4119561
>”I’ll keep his attention here. Double back and keep your distance, but don’t lose sight of him. See if we can’t follow him when he reports back.” If he is scouting, he is scouting for someone. [Hearty]
>>
>>4120489
Lol.

Between last quest and this, so true.

> Saint is not for Lewds

> The Fae are not for Lewds!
>>
>>4120489
> Vancewell Anons want a repeat of White Bitch
>>
>>4119561
>>“Let’s ask our shadow some questions. Hyah!” If you want answers you will need to ask them, directly. Against the living, captured scout is an entrée to victory. Father taught you that. [Haughty]
>>
>>4119561
>>”I’ll keep his attention here. Double back and keep your distance, but don’t lose sight of him. See if we can’t follow him when he reports back.” If he is scouting, he is scouting for someone. [Hearty]

Theres a good reason why they havnt ridden out to capture him yet and why they're not letting him know hes been made. Lets not rock the boat.
>>
>>4120790
The good reason is because this is a game where we make choices ourselves, idiot
>>
File: 1424289712868.png (419 KB, 1000x800)
419 KB
419 KB PNG
>>4120849
Thats nice. Its not like the world forgotten creates actually lives and that characters & factions move and take action in it with their own plots and motivations independent of whether we have any input on it or not.

Oh no, the whole world revolves around our character.
>>
>>4120637
>here i go aborting again
>>
>>4120790
Who's they? They people behind the scout?

How do you expect them to know about Emile before the scout returns lol.
>>
>>4120875
Just watch. People are gonna White Knight Emile into a literal sexless angel and we'll end up in the same situation as Black Company re: Waifus.
>>
>>4120860
Get outta here, pinky! No flesh for you to feast on here! Git, scram, g'wan gettout!
>>
>>4120880
>they havnt ridden out to capture him yet

>capture him

I mean, clearly i'm not taking about the scout. I'm referring to Jess and Rousseau. Likely they're bidding their time for a good opportunity to either surprise and capture him; that it could be they're wary of spooking him and making him run.

>>4120885
Ah a fellow man of culture.
>>
>>4119588
>>4119561
Changing my vote to
>”I’ll keep his attention here. Double back and keep your distance, but don’t lose sight of him. See if we can’t follow him when he reports back.” If he is scouting, he is scouting for someone. [Hearty]
>>
>>4120888
They're currently with us, though? We're givmg the order to capture him, follow him, or ignore him.

Which of the three do you want them to do?
>>
>>4120883
They'll be a point where we either embrace the idea of sex outside of marriage or get hitched and don't have to worry about such prudances.

Or y'know disregard chivalry acquire sex
>>
>>4120888
It was such a long time ago. Sadly Anons fucked the setting right up.

It was like Valen Quest, but without Anons taking it seriously.
>>
>>4120944
Nah. They're gonna go full "Muh Angel" and lose their dick.
>>
I thought we were gonna have hot bro knight sex.
>>
>>4120888
They obviously wanted to let us know before taking action, especially Jess. That's why they haven't done anything yet
>>
>thread #20 up for nearly two weeks
>page 4


Works for me and my steady schedule, but is /qst/ actually dead?
>>
>>4121054
> Wovl

> KSV

> Malxism

Are you a doctor?
>>
>>4121054
Dead in the water from first creation/exile from /tg/.

Quests never had that critical mass to sustain a whole board.
>>
>>4121054
We were never alive to begin with, /tg/ was when quests lived now we suffer the long undeath of /qst/
>>
>>4121104
There's 4 running I still follow, so . . . .

But yeah. A bunch of QMs went to SmutKun and Fiction.live
>>
>>4121054
I'd also argue that this thread has gone less swiftly down the catalog because you nipped the shitflinging in the bud
>>
>>4121054
yeah it's dead i only come here for like 2 quests
>>
File: Tracking Roll.jpg (133 KB, 800x1000)
133 KB
133 KB JPG
>”I’ll keep his attention here. Double back and keep your distance, but don’t lose sight of him. See if we can’t follow him when he reports back.” If he is scouting, he is scouting for someone. [Hearty]

”I’ll keep his attention here. Double back and keep your distance, but don’t lose sight of him. See if we can’t follow him when he reports back.” You’ll hold your position here at the rear of the column, joking and jesting louder than strictly necessary as you explain the situation to your fellow knights. That way his eyes will be on you and you in turn will be able to spot the scout if they are spooked and make a run for it.

Brother Rousseau nods and begins to ride up the column, doubtless to leave his mount with another and wheel around from the west. It is eerie how he and Jess the Kid seem to be able to read one another’s intentions without a spoken word. In a disturbingly human gesture, she draws her thumb across her throat with a questioning tilt of the wooden mask.

You shake your head. “Alive, if possible. But the priority is learning where he came from, without them knowing the game is up.”

-------------------------------------------

Tracking Roll – Companions
> Jess: Intimate Terrain Knowledge / Scout: Skilled Quarry 50DC
> Courageous Sky +1 Re-Roll


Double Fail = Put up a fight. Jess or Rousseau must take 1AV save.
0 = Hunter becomes the hunted. Jess the Kid or Brother Rousseau must take 1d4 AV saves.
1 = He’s on to us! If Jess fails her ranged roll, you will need to perform a difficult Riding roll to catch up with him.
2 = I told you, I wanted him alive. The scout won’t be reporting back anytime soon. Or ever. But at least the hostile party is blind to your movements.
3 = Excellent work you two. The scout is entirely unaware of his tail, and the camp is discovered with them none the wiser.
Double Success = Look what we found. The scout is captured, ready to be put to the question.


3 rolls of 1d100. You have 1 re-roll.

Happy Hunting…
>>
Rolled 82 (1d100)

>>4121396
>>
Rolled 44 (1d100)

>>4121396
>>
Rolled 62 (1d100)

>>4121396
>>
>>4121399
Good thing my roll doesn't count.

>>4121400
A double! Nice going anon.
>>
>>4121399
>b8e2Ob6w

This roll is not counted. I did warn you.
>>
>>4121396
>>4121400

Wait, does this mean we capture him anyways.
>>
>>4121400
nice
>>
Rolled 61 (1d100)

>>4121399
>>4121404
considering we need another roll then
>>
>>4121402
New ID unlinked roll, not counted.


I still require 2 rolls, though the double success means that is mostly to see whether you also find out the location of the camp.
>>
>>4121408
You got the lower.

You do the honours, mate.
>>
Rolled 100 (1d100)

>>4121396
>>
>>4121412
Oh fuck you.
>>
Rolled 56 (1d100)

>>4121396
>>
Rolled 85 (1d100)

>>4121412
thank god you don't count on the roll

>>4121408
Re-roll? Re-roll
>>
>>4121412
Thank the Almighty this doesnt count.

>>4121408
>>4121402
Any of you can re-roll.
>>
>>4116001
>>4121409
Boss man, this is me. Sorry about not linking.
>>
>>4121417
nuts
>>
>>4121405
Jess the Kid probably went Robin Hood on him and sniped his leg with her longbow. Don't forget she has that basilisk eye which gives petrifying gaze effect.
>>
Doesn't seem like there was a crit fail/ crit success thing so we should be alright?
>>
Can we still do the ranger roll to see whether we discover the location of the camp or not?
>>
>>4121427
It was most likely a sling shot if it was close range.
>>
>>4121412
So very close...

>>4121400
>>4121402
>>4121408
>>4121417
> 1 Success: He’s on to us! If Jess fails her ranged roll, you will need to perform a difficult Riding roll to catch up with him.
>Double Success: Look what we found. The scout is captured, ready to be put to the question.

The scout is captured after a short pursuit. He won't report back when expected, but you are free to ply him for intel.

----------------------------------

Several long minutes pass as you make idle conversation, you do your best to watch the stalker out of the corner of your eye. Suddenly the man’s head snaps to his right and he bolts in the other direction. You and the other knights ride up the grassy ridge to give chase, but you have little chance of catching him when you spot him nearing a chestnut rouncey tied behind the treeline. Or at least you think so, until the man falls a few feet short of his getaway ride with an arrow sticking out of the back of his leg.

Damn but that Fae girl can shoot.

“By the Book, what a shot!” Brother Cancicail exclaims in agreement as you approached the downed scout. Brother Rousseau has disarmed and bound him in short order, slightly red cheeks the only indication of the older man’s exertion.

“I ent’ hurt nobody!” The captured scout, a man with a drooping face that is only further exacerbated by his current wound and predicament, protests his innocence. “I was ‘ungry, see? Just wanted to see wots you left over.”

[1/2]
>>
[2/2]

“That’s a very fine and well-fed horse for a half-starved man. A man in your position knows that is a bad lie.” As a man of unusual height and size, you have a tendency to loom. When the situation calls for it, you can loom better than most. Towering over the captured scout, you lean in close. “A man in your position knows that we know what you were about. A man in your position would know that he should consider his next words carefully. Who are they? How many? Where is their camp?”

“Dunno wot you’re talking about.” Droop-face’s adams apple bobs, his voice is shaky. Jus’ wanted some foo-oof.”

“It’s ‘Dunno Milord’ to you, slackchops.” Your squire cracks his knuckles, ready to sink another fist into the cowering outlaw’s gut.

“Thank you Mikail, manners are important.” You nod, motioning for the boy to step back as you kneel down face to face. “Let’s try again. Who are they? How many? Where is their camp?”

“Ain’t nobody. Ain’t nothing. Ain’t no place.” Behind the captured scout, Mikail scowls at his lack of proper address. “Yer don’t know wot yer on about.”

--------------------------------------------------------------------

(1)
> “Jess, the next time this man speaks and I don’t like his answer, remove one of his fingers.” You don’t need to dirty your hands while you ask the questions. You have people for that. [Haughty]

> “I tire of your lies. The next time you lie I will begin cutting, and I will not stop cutting until you speak the truth.” Putting a captured scout to the question is an unpleasant reality of war. [Hearty]

> “Answer our questions truthfully and I swear that you shall be released unharmed.” Bandit or not, you do not think you have Sir Gilbern’s stomach for outright torture. [Idealist]

(2) The chestnut Rouncey
>As the senior member of this party, the animal is yours by right. You will make sure to reward Jess the Kid for her efforts appropriately. [Haughty]

>Jess the Kid deserves a reward, and there is little better opportunity to demonstrate your generosity as liege than by gifting her this fine prize. [Hearty]
>>
>>4121507
>> “I tire of your lies. The next time you lie I will begin cutting, and I will not stop cutting until you speak the truth.” Putting a captured scout to the question is an unpleasant reality of war. [Hearty]
>As the senior member of this party, the animal is yours by right. You will make sure to reward Jess the Kid for her efforts appropriately. [Haughty]
>>
>>4121507
> “Jess, the next time this man speaks and I don’t like his answer, remove one of his fingers.” You don’t need to dirty your hands while you ask the questions. You have people for that. [Haughty]

We're in a dangerous unknown situation. No place for total mercy without knowing the situation. If he gives us good intel we might let him go, but we shouldn't promise it yet

>As the senior member of this party, the animal is yours by right. You will make sure to reward Jess the Kid for her efforts appropriately. [Haughty]

I'm worried that if we give this horse to Jess, Mikail is going to feel slighted since he is our squire. If we give it to Mikail Jess will feel slighted since she did the work of capturing him
>>
>>4121507

> “I tire of your lies. The next time you lie I will begin cutting, and I will not stop cutting until you speak the truth.” Putting a captured scout to the question is an unpleasant reality of war. [Hearty]

>Jess the Kid deserves a reward, and there is little better opportunity to demonstrate your generosity as liege than by gifting her this fine prize. [Hearty]
I may be wrong, but doesn't torture break one of our vow ? Not harming an unharmed opponent or stuff ?
>>
>>4121507
>“Answer our questions truthfully and I swear that you shall be released unharmed.” Bandit or not, you do not think you have Sir Gilbern’s stomach for outright torture. [Idealist]

Anons please remember that we don't know whether this guy is a bandit, an assassin, or just some soldier scout for someone. Tracking us doesn't make him an outlaw. We need to hand him to the authorities in Darbyshire

>Jess the Kid deserves a reward, and there is little better opportunity to demonstrate your generosity as liege than by gifting her this fine prize. [Hearty]

Well done Jess!
>>
>>4121507
>> “I tire of your lies. The next time you lie I will begin cutting, and I will not stop cutting until you speak the truth.” Putting a captured scout to the question is an unpleasant reality of war. [Hearty]

>As the senior member of this party, the animal is yours by right. You will make sure to reward Jess the Kid for her efforts appropriately. [Haughty]
it's not that i think she doesn't deserve its more that a horse isn't really suited for her in combat she can't take it into the trees and she wouldn't make use of it's more offensive capabilities plus I doubt a fae knows how to ride a horse
>>
>>4121507
>“Answer our questions truthfully and I swear that you shall be released unharmed.” Bandit or not, you do not think you have Sir Gilbern’s stomach for outright torture. [Idealist]

>Jess the Kid deserves a reward, and there is little better opportunity to demonstrate your generosity as liege than by gifting her this fine prize. [Hearty]

Headpat Kid for a job well done.

>>4121514
Mikail isn't petty and won't have a problem with it. She caught him so she deserves it.
>>
>>4121507
1
>“Answer our questions truthfully and I swear that you shall be released unharmed.” Bandit or not, you do not think you have Sir Gilbern’s stomach for outright torture. [Idealist]

Don't wanna harm this dude while we don't know his motive and who he's working for.

2
>Jess the Kid deserves a reward, and there is little better opportunity to demonstrate your generosity as liege than by gifting her this fine prize. [Hearty]

She got him she receives it. It's as fair as it gets.
>>
>>4121517
>I may be wrong, but doesn't torture break one of our vow ? Not harming an unharmed opponent or stuff ?

Not quite. We can't execute him but I don't think torture is out of the question despite how uncomfortable it may be. "Strike down" typically means kill. Don't kill a defenceless are unarmed opponent

>Knight's Code
(1) "His Blade Defends the Helpless"
+Blademaster: +10DC to Combat
-Vow: You may not strike down a defenceless or unarmed opponent.
>>
>>4116106
My last ID btw.
>>
>>4121507
>“Answer our questions truthfully and I swear that you shall be released unharmed.” Bandit or not, you do not think you have Sir Gilbern’s stomach for outright torture. [Idealist]

I like that Emille may not have the taste or desire for torture weither it be on principle or a lack of stomach for it.

>As the senior member of this party, the animal is yours by right. You will make sure to reward Jess the Kid for her efforts appropriately. [Haughty]

Give her Charlie? or hand Mikhail Charlie?
>>
>>4121507
(1)
>“Answer our questions truthfully and I swear that you shall be released unharmed.” Bandit or not, you do not think you have Sir Gilbern’s stomach for outright torture. [Idealist]

The fact this guy has a rouncy tells me ge isn't just some highwayman outlaw.

(2)
>Jess the Kid deserves a reward, and there is little better opportunity to demonstrate your generosity as liege than by gifting her this fine prize. [Hearty]

A rouncy would be the absolute perfect mount steed for a ranger like Jess. A Rouncy gives tracking and pathfinding bonuses and is an incredibly intelligent horsr. It will be a great help for her.
>>
>>4121507
(1)
> “Jess, the next time this man speaks and I don’t like his answer, remove one of his fingers.” You don’t need to dirty your hands while you ask the questions. You have people for that. [Haughty]

(2) The chestnut Rouncey
>As the senior member of this party, the animal is yours by right. You will make sure to reward Jess the Kid for her efforts appropriately. [Haughty]

Haughty is the way go go to avoid breaking vows. And shit. An actual warhorse.
>>
>>4121507
>“Answer our questions truthfully and I swear that you shall be released unharmed.” Bandit or not, you do not think you have Sir Gilbern’s stomach for outright torture. [Idealist]

>Jess the Kid deserves a reward, and there is little better opportunity to demonstrate your generosity as liege than by gifting her this fine prize. [Hearty]

It was thanks to her that we captured him and got the horse so she has earned it by right.
>>
>>4121507
>“Answer our questions truthfully and I swear that you shall be released unharmed.” Bandit or not, you do not think you have Sir Gilbern’s stomach for outright torture. [Idealist]

Sir Marcel and the other Knights Comitas wouldn't approve of torturing someone a have no idea of. This guy could be a Queensmen tracking us.

>Jess the Kid deserves a reward, and there is little better opportunity to demonstrate your generosity as liege than by gifting her this fine prize. [Hearty]

Don't see why would anyone else deserve it more than her. Reward by merit and accomplishment.
>>
>>4121514
>>4121507

Alright I've thought about it and I'm changing my Horse Vote to

>Jess the Kid deserves a reward, and there is little better opportunity to demonstrate your generosity as liege than by gifting her this fine prize. [Hearty]

She earned it. Mikail will get his rewards in the future as he grows. We really need to look at outfitting him properly soon though
>>
>>4117766
Me
>>
Idealist is a fools choice.

We basically tell him we give up all leverage on getting anything out of him. He tells the truth he goes free, he lies or refuses to say anything, what do we do? Hold him? If hes from a camp waiting to attack us, they’ll move the moment he takes too long to return. And with his equipment, he and his band are
prepared to do something. We need info and we need it now.
>>
>>4121557
Idealist for sure is the naive vote this time around. It's banking on us always picking idealist and showing that sticking to one value like a hardliner means leaving yourself open to risk and danger. We aren't a cardboard cutout, we're a multifaceted person and we need to reach outside of our usual modus operandi if we want to be successful.
>>
>>4121507
>“Jess, the next time this man speaks and I don’t like his answer, remove one of his fingers.” You don’t need to dirty your hands while you ask the questions. You have people for that. [Haughty]
>Jess the Kid deserves a reward, and there is little better opportunity to demonstrate your generosity as liege than by gifting her this fine prize. [Hearty]
>>
>>4121507
> “I tire of your lies. The next time you lie I will begin cutting, and I will not stop cutting until you speak the truth.” Putting a captured scout to the question is an unpleasant reality of war. [Hearty]

>Jess the Kid deserves a reward, and there is little better opportunity to demonstrate your generosity as liege than by gifting her this fine prize. [Hearty]

Her shot made his capture possible.
>>
>>4121557
I'd rather not at least intially play a character willing to torture a man for information for once, if he talks he walks and if it to our own detriment so be it.

If its a mistake Emille learns from his failure at the cost of preparedness, if he doesn't well I don't know.
>>
>>4121557
Made me think that, should Emile die, I hope we get to play the Pascae merchant knight in the most amoral way possible while still retaining a veneer of perfect knightliness
>Of course I would never strike a man while he was unarmed, my overzealous subordinate did it. Truly an unfortunate accident.

>>4121507
> “Jess, the next time this man speaks and I don’t like his answer, remove one of his fingers.” You don’t need to dirty your hands while you ask the questions. You have people for that. [Haughty]
>>
>>4121557
>>4121561
Idealist let's us exchange valuable info in exchange for what he values the most: his life.

It's also absolutely false that it the idealist option is the "naive" choice. It makes it pretty clear that the information must be truthful. There is nothing stopping him from lying in the other two options as there's no guarantee that he'll be allowed to live after we're done toturing him. He'll either lie or just refuse to answer.
>>
>>4121566
We get all 3 rolls, great. We screw this up, the lives of the pilgrims are forfeit, the lives we are supposed to protect.

And for a character who has already gotten through the secret war innawoods and done spying and skulduggery to piece together information, this strikes me as incredible naive and ahows he didnt learn a single thing from our time there.
>>
>>4121568
>Idealist let's us exchange valuable info in exchange for what he values the most: his life.

They all do that, we aren't planning on executing him. We're threatening him essentially.

>It's also absolutely false that it the idealist option is the "naive" choice.

Well... that's an opinion, as is mine

> It makes it pretty clear that the information must be truthful

That is fairly meaningless as you point out in your next comment

>There is nothing stopping him from lying in the other two options as there's no guarantee that he'll be allowed to live after we're done toturing him. He'll either lie or just refuse to answer.

Telling him he'll walk free isn't going to guarantee that the info will be honest.

We have to consider here for a moment that Emile is not in 2020 with all the knowledge that brings. You and I know that actual torture is not often the best route. People lie when they are scared to tell you what they think you want to know so you'll let them go. Emile doesn't know that (I assume) otherwise torture wouldn't be a legit option. We need to look at this from his eyes, not our own.

This is a pretty serious situation. Not only are we responsible for protecting the pilgrims, we've just (narrowly) escaped a cloak and dagger secret war. Now we have someone tracking us. We can't be sure why and we need to ensure we find out. As far as Emile knows, torture (or the threat thereof) is a legit tactic used in times of war and duress. It's hard to stomach, and I don't think Emile would like it, but I think he'd see it as necessary
>>
Come on people, this is the time to be to be lmore like Cain and less like Adam.
>>
what i don't understand is why anons want jess to cut off fingers is really good to instil that mentality into her she is quite malleable at this stage considering she has had no companionship due to being an outsider
>>
>>4121578
It's a threat homie. We instill fear in this inscrutable guy in order to force some amount of information out of him. I'd prefer not to cut this guys fingers off but if it comes down to our people being ambushed or this guy losing a finger or two I know which I'd prefer. Hopefully the threat is enough to get him to give us answers. If not... so be it.

We obviously don't want Jess to enter the human world as a blood thirsty cutthroat, but nor can she walk into it naive. There is a balance to be kept and as was stated earlier, Emile knows that torture happens and is acceptable at times. We just need to reinforce the fact that this isn't the go to method for all situations. She's new to human society, not retarded, her people likely have similar situations and ideas
>>
>>4121578
Anon.... Jess isn't actually a kid
>>
>>4121569
If thats the consequence of the Idealist choice than so be it, I don't think its a line Emille is willing to cross yet you obviously disagree and well that your opinon.

I still think Emille still possess a level of naivety that hasn't yet been stripped away from him, its whats allowed him to power through the SoS's taunt and part of why he's still an Idealist and part of that is taking people for their word and not considering that harsher, crueler measures need to be taken to protect those he's charged with.
>>
>>4121584
I think he's talking about her transition to human? in that she's still an outsider to humanity and that her understanding to what humans constitute right and wrong are still developing.
>>
>>4121588
yeah i meant this she's been in the human world fro a week or so she will be taking queues from us on how to act
>>
>>4121572
>They all do that, we aren't planning on executing him. We're threatening him essentially.

You aren't voting to threaten him. You are voting to torture him through mutilation of the fingers and won't stop till he says something be it either regardless of if its true not to mention without a guarantee of his life afterwards. That is something Emile wasn't willing to do even on Craig. Why would he do that to someone who was simply tracking him? He doesn't even know who this guy is and what's his motive.

>That is fairly meaningless as you point out in your next comment

It's not meaningless. It guarantees him his life and safety from torture if he provides truthful information.

>Telling him he'll walk free isn't going to guarantee that the info will be honest.

Don't be disingenuous. The vote isn't to let him go free. It's to guarantee his life if he provides correct information. That's a far better incentive than "I'll keep torturing you till you give me something."

>This is a pretty serious situation. Not only are we responsible for protecting the pilgrims, we've just (narrowly) escaped a cloak and dagger secret war. Now we have someone tracking us. We can't be sure why and we need to ensure we find out. As far as Emile knows, torture (or the threat thereof) is a legit tactic used in times of war and duress. It's hard to stomach, and I don't think Emile would like it, but I think he'd see it as necessary

That''s a shitty untruthful excuse and you know it. Torturing him isn't for protecting the pilgrims. It's for getting information on who is he working for. The pilgrims haven't been kidnapped. If Emile wants to protect the pilgrims, then he can just take them to the town of Darbyshire. In fact, ask the pilgrims on what would they think of Sir Emile of torturing this man. See if they'll approve.
>>
>>4121507
>> “I tire of your lies. The next time you lie I will begin cutting, and I will not stop cutting until you speak the truth.” Putting a captured scout to the question is an unpleasant reality of war. [Hearty]
>Jess the Kid deserves a reward, and there is little better opportunity to demonstrate your generosity as liege than by gifting her this fine prize. [Hearty]
>>
>>4121507
It would be better to be discrete and careful here. I don't want it to turn out that we tortured a Queensmen scout who was simply keeping on a eye on us. That rouncey of his indicates that he isn't just some outlaw. We should figure out who he's working for before committing to anything. Also, ordering Jess to torture someone would be pretty messed up. She's an adolescent.
>>
>>4121600
>You aren't voting to threaten him. You are voting to torture him through mutilation of the fingers and won't stop till he says something be it either regardless of if its true not to mention without a guarantee of his life afterwards.

If it comes to that sure but I think it's ultimately a threat that we'll carry through with if it comes down to it. I don't think Emile thinks it will come to that.

>It's not meaningless. It guarantees him his life and safety from torture if he provides truthful information.

As far as he is likely concerned, nothing is guaranteed. He is a prisoner is a harsh land. I think there may be a miscommunication here though. I was saying that you saying the information must be truthful was meaningless because he could lie and we wouldn't know it.

Basically the idea that we'll release him if his info is truthful doesn't hold a lot of weight because he doesn't know us and doesn't know how we'll treat him after we get that info

>That is something Emile wasn't willing to do even on Craig. Why would he do that to someone who was simply tracking him? He doesn't even know who this guy is and what's his motive.

Experience hardens and changes a person. Maybe he isn't willing to take those chances after what he's seen and experienced. Emile now knows of a secret order, he knows that people have been silenced for being witnesses to things. Maybe he doesn't want to risk these pilgrims ending up with the same fate and is willing to go further than he usually would to prevent it? Not to mention he is protecting his brother directly. He's faced down serious horrors and bore witness to secret cabals waging hidden wars. That changes a person. Emile isn't made of stone.

>Don't be disingenuous. The vote isn't to let him go free. It's to guarantee his life if he provides correct information. That's a far better incentive than "I'll keep torturing you till you give me something."

I'm not...

>“Answer our questions truthfully and I swear that you shall be released unharmed.”

As you can see if he gives us what we believe to be honest information he walks away. I'm not sure why you think I was being disingenuous but... I wasn't

>That''s a shitty untruthful excuse and you know it. Torturing him isn't for protecting the pilgrims. It's for getting information on who is he working for.

I'd appreciate it if you went back to arguing in good faith. I'm not trying to spin things, I'm giving my take on it. As far as I can see these are one and the same. Emile wants to protect the pilgrims, he can't do that blindly and so needs information on who this secret scout is working for. Don't twist my words please.

>The pilgrims haven't been kidnapped.
Not yet no. I'm more worried they'll be killed as witnesses

>If Emile wants to protect the pilgrims, then he can just take them to the town of Darbyshire

That doesn't guarantee protection at all. It just means that we'll have crowds to contend with.
>>
>>4121618
>>4121600
> In fact, ask the pilgrims on what would they think of Sir Emile of torturing this man. See if they'll approve.

We certainly could but I don't think that would be as relevant as you think. They are not hardened knights or men of war. They are soft civilians and holy men/women. They don't have the experience or knowledge that comes with dealing with spies. I'm not saying we shouldn't ask them and weigh their opinions, I just don't know that that would have as much relevance as Emile and the other knights opinions in this specific situation. Might be worth asking the others though
>>
>>4121507
>“I tire of your lies. The next time you lie I will begin cutting, and I will not stop cutting until you speak the truth.” Putting a captured scout to the question is an unpleasant reality of war. [Hearty]

A man of honor does the dirty job by himself. *entering Ned Stark mode*

>Jess the Kid deserves a reward, and there is little better opportunity to demonstrate your generosity as liege than by gifting her this fine prize. [Hearty]
>>
>>4121618
>If it comes to that sure but I think it's ultimately a threat that we'll carry through with if it comes down to it. I don't think Emile thinks it will come to that.

The vote you chose literally has Emile ordering Jess to torture him if he doesn't like his answer. Get real.

>As far as he is likely concerned, nothing is guaranteed. He is a prisoner is a harsh land. I think there may be a miscommunication here though. I was saying that you saying the information must be truthful was meaningless because he could lie and we wouldn't know it.

We're keeping him imprisoned until we have verified the info. Lying after a guarantee that his life will be secure if he tells the truth will mean that his life is forfeit.

Basically the idea that we'll release him if his info is truthful doesn't hold a lot of weight because he doesn't know us and doesn't know how we'll treat him after we get that info

The person he's working for has almost certainly provided him with info on us. He's been tracking us for three days. Of course he knows us.

>
Experience hardens and changes a person. Maybe he isn't willing to take those chances after what he's seen and experienced. Emile now knows of a secret order, he knows that people have been silenced for being witnesses to things. Maybe he doesn't want to risk these pilgrims ending up with the same fate and is willing to go further than he usually would to prevent it? Not to mention he is protecting his brother directly. He's faced down serious horrors and bore witness to secret cabals waging hidden wars. That changes a person. Emile isn't made of stone.

That's complete bullshit though. If he doesn't want them to get involved, then he would just put them in the near town then deal with this. You've changed the goalpost. First you said it's for protecting the pilgrims and now your saying it's for making sure they don't get involved. Find an excuse and stick to it.

>I'm not...
Suuuuuuure.

>As you can see if he gives us what we believe to be honest information he walks away. I'm not sure why you think I was being disingenuous but... I wasn't

It literally says that the questions must be truthful before he's released. You're disingenuous and are trying to twist it.

>I'd appreciate it if you went back to arguing in good faith. I'm not trying to spin things, I'm giving my take on it. As far as I can see these are one and the same. Emile wants to protect the pilgrims, he can't do that blindly and so needs information on who this secret scout is working for. Don't twist my words please.

No, they are not one and the same. Torturing someone to get info on who they are working for isn't about protecting the pilgrims and you know it.

>Not yet no. I'm more worried they'll be killed as witnesses

And you have to fall on false presumptions with zero substantial evidence. Really getting desperate
>>
>>4121618
>>4121621
>That doesn't guarantee protection at all. It just means that we'll have crowds to contend with.

It absolutely guarantees protection. They have the safety of the cities' walls and guards. Emile is the one they're tracking. You don't want to protect the pilgrims and are just using them as an shitty excuse.

>We certainly could but I don't think that would be as relevant as you think. They are not hardened knights or men of war. They are soft civilians and holy men/women. They don't have the experience or knowledge that comes with dealing with spies. I'm not saying we shouldn't ask them and weigh their opinions, I just don't know that that would have as much relevance as Emile and the other knights opinions in this specific situation. Might be worth asking the others though

Just what I thought. You came up with an excuse to not ask the people you claim to be protecting (you aren't you are just using them as an excuse for torture) because you know their answer. I thought you'd have the decency to ask the people you claim to be protecting what they think. Ask the Knights Comitas too. See their answer.
>>
>>4121637
>The vote you chose literally has Emile ordering Jess to torture him if he doesn't like his answer. Get real.
Which is a threat to the guy, speak (the truth) or we'll torture you
Unless this guy is a trained agent or die hard fanatic that's where he should crack
>>
>>4119634
>>4119513
>>4115891
Me

>>4121507
1
>Idealist

2
>Hearty

Torturing someone who can't fight back is the deed of a thug not a knight. Emile didn't torture his would be assassin Craig but he's willing to torture a prisoner scout? Torture also doesn't work especially if the tortured don't think they'll be allowed to live regardless of whether they tell the truth or not.
>>
>>4121507
>>4121627
Changing my vote for :
> “Answer our questions truthfully and I swear that you shall be released unharmed.” Bandit or not, you do not think you have Sir Gilbern’s stomach for outright torture. [Idealist]
>>
>>4121656
>>4121507
I thought that would go without saying but I guess not considering the discussion, changing my vote to a mix of menacing torture for the guy and promising to release him unharmed (once we've taken care of the threat) should he give us sufficient information
>Haughty + Idealist for the first option
>>
>>4121507
> “Answer our questions truthfully and I swear that you shall be released unharmed.” Bandit or not, you do not think you have Sir Gilbern’s stomach for outright torture. [Idealist]

>Jess the Kid deserves a reward, and there is little better opportunity to demonstrate your generosity as liege than by gifting her this fine prize. [Hearty]
>>
>>4121637
>The vote you chose literally has Emile ordering Jess to torture him if he doesn't like his answer. Get real.

Yes it does. As I previously said, it may happen. But I think Emile believes the threat is enough to get the job done.

>The person he's working for has almost certainly provided him with info on us. He's been tracking us for three days. Of course he knows us.

He knows what his boss told him... he doesn't know what kind of person we are or what kind of knight... you're being a bit silly.

>That's complete bullshit though.

Again, this is your opinion...

>If he doesn't want them to get involved, then he would just put them in the near town then deal with this. You've changed the goalpost. First you said it's for protecting the pilgrims and now your saying it's for making sure they don't get involved. Find an excuse and stick to it.

No you're intentionally misunderstanding. Putting them in a town doesn't necessarily protect them. It will make them somewhat safer but if we're around them and it happens to be one of the groups looking to silence witnesses then they are in danger just from being near us.

Not to mention, there doesn't have to be 1 specific reason here, I'm allowed to cite more than one thing without it being "moving the goalposts". It isn't as if Emile can sequester them away forever.

> First you said it's for protecting the pilgrims and now your saying it's for making sure they don't get involved

Because those are the same thing... If we involve, them they are in danger... I also never said I don't want to involve them at all..

>Suuuuuuure.

Please. Stop being a dick. I'm trying to have a debate with you in good faith. Forgotten has already asked us to cut this shit out.

>It literally says that the questions must be truthful before he's released. You're disingenuous and are trying to twist it.

How are we to be certain of that before all the cards are on the table? That is my point there. Are we going to leave him with the Knights Comitas whilst we check out the info? That's a possibility I suppose. Us verifying the info however puts us in potentially imminent danger, hence putting pressure on him via threats to give up everything he knows.

>It absolutely guarantees protection. They have the safety of the cities' walls and guards. Emile is the one they're tracking. You don't want to protect the pilgrims and are just using them as an shitty excuse.

No. If they are already sneaking they may use spies and stealthy people to attack us. If a pilgrim is about they're at risk as well
>>
>>4104327
>>4112787
This is me.

>>4121507
>1
> “Answer our questions truthfully and I swear that you shall be released unharmed.” Bandit or not, you do not think you have Sir Gilbern’s stomach for outright torture. [Idealist]

>2
>Jess the Kid deserves a reward, and there is little better opportunity to demonstrate your generosity as liege than by gifting her this fine prize. [Hearty]

Please let's not order a kid like Jess or Mikail that we're supposed to be a guardian parent of to torture someone. If you're going to do corrupt shit like torturing someone, then do it yourself. Don't corrupt someone else's soul especially not children like Mikail and Jess by ordering them to do it.
>>
>>4121699
>No, they are not one and the same. Torturing someone to get info on who they are working for isn't about protecting the pilgrims and you know it.

>And you have to fall on false presumptions with zero substantial evidence. Really getting desperate

> Just what I thought. You came up with an excuse to not ask the people you claim to be protecting (you aren't you are just using them as an excuse for torture) because you know their answer. I thought you'd have the decency to ask the people you claim to be protecting what they think. Ask the Knights Comitas too. See their answer.

Look honestly... you obviously have a fucking thorn in your shoe and you don't want to argue in good faith. I am seriously struggling to not turn this into a shit fight but you’re being a bit of a cunt. We have differing opinions. That’s fine. But stop insisting that I’m trying to manipulate things or twist my words etc on a vote that isn’t even that hugely important. You’re being absurd. Anyway, you and I are done arguing, for the sake of the game.
>>
>>4121507
> “Jess, the next time this man speaks and I don’t like his answer, remove one of his fingers.” You don’t need to dirty your hands while you ask the questions. You have people for that. [Haughty

>Jess the Kid deserves a reward, and there is little better opportunity to demonstrate your generosity as liege than by gifting her this fine prize. [Hearty

Soo close to getting a nat 100 fail

>>4119773
This is me.
>>
>>4121699
>>4121703
>Yes it does. As I previously said, it may happen. But I think Emile believes the threat is enough to get the job done.

So you admit that it isn't just a threat.

>He knows what his boss told him... he doesn't know what kind of person we are or what kind of knight... you're being a bit silly.

And his boss informed him personal info on the person he's tracking.

>No you're intentionally misunderstanding. Putting them in a town doesn't necessarily protect them. It will make them somewhat safer but if we're around them and it happens to be one of the groups looking to silence witnesses then they are in danger just from being near us.

I said we put them in the town and then Emile goes after whoever is tracking him.

>If we involve, them they are in danger...

Which is exactly what you're doing.

>I also never said I don't want to involve them at all..

So you don't care about protecting them and want to put them in danger. Got it.

>I'm trying to have a debate with you

I am debating you. Forgotten asked us to cut insults out. ''Suuuuuuuuure'' isn't an insult.

>How are we to be certain of that before all the cards are on the table? That is my point there. Are we going to leave him with the Knights Comitas whilst we check out the info? That's a possibility I suppose. Us verifying the info however puts us in potentially imminent danger, hence putting pressure on him via threats to give up everything he knows.

It literally says that we aren't going to release him until the info has been verified to be true. That doesn't mean that we will try to verify it for him.

>No. If they are already sneaking they may use spies and stealthy people to attack us. If a pilgrim is about they're at risk as well

They're using spies to track Emile not the pilgrims. It's Emile whom they're after.
>>
Forgotten could put up a vote about what color socks we should put on in the morning and you would still find a way to make a "debate" out of it complete with crying and word walls
>>
Both of you need to chill out.
Its been like 2 votes befor the last battle of texts.
>>
>>4121784
To answer that is red.
>>
>>4121800
Nah it's blue cunt fight me outside woolies
>>
>>4121800
>>4121804
You're both wrong its Green

wait those are Damiens
>>
Guys, I just realized something. Why don't we have Courageous Sky fly up to the air to spot their camp? They must be near and there is no way he won't be able to spot an entire freaking army camp. We can also verify the info he provides us that way.
>>
>>4121850
That's... that's actually some really good thinking anon. Hawks have Incredible vision which allows them to spot small prey from miles away while they're on the air. An army camp should be no problem for a legatus griffinhawk like Courageous Sky. We can also if this guy is lying to us that. Damn good thinking anon.
>>
>>4121862
>We can also if this guy is lying to us that.
We can also see if this guy is lying to us that way*

Sorry for the typos.
>>
>>4110754
>>4112889
These are me.

>>4121507
(1)
>“Answer our questions truthfully and I swear that you shall be released unharmed.” Bandit or not, you do not think you have Sir Gilbern’s stomach for outright torture. [Idealist]

(2) The chestnut Rouncey
>Jess the Kid deserves a reward, and there is little better opportunity to demonstrate your generosity as liege than by gifting her this fine prize. [Hearty]

Sir Emile is a very pious and devout knight of Canton. The main figure of his faith is Salve Regina, the compassionate and empathetic Mother of Mercy who offered mercy and redemption to everyone, and the woman who was tortured and tormented because she refused to reveal any knowledge she had that might endanger her sons Adam and Cain in order to protect them. Do you have any idea what would it look on Emile to do the same thing the slavers did to Salve Regina?

Emile's soul will be judged by the Almighty in the afterlife based on every good and ill action he committed throughout his life.
>>
>>4121850
Supporting this
>>
>>4121862
But will he know the difference from a town or a camp?
>>
>>4121507
> Since you refuse to provide proof of who you are, we shall take you back to give confession before your hanging.

Send Courageous Sky up to look for the camp. We don't know who this guy is, and it's safer anyways to interrogate him there than here alone in the woods where he might have allies able to counter ambush us.

>Jess the Kid deserves a reward, and there is little better opportunity to demonstrate your generosity as liege than by gifting her this fine prize. [Hearty]
>>
>>4121507
> “Jess, the next time this man speaks and I don’t like his answer, remove one of his fingers.” You don’t need to dirty your hands while you ask the questions. You have people for that. [Haughty]

Man I dunno why I bother trying a write in after so many votes. I'll go with this.
>>
>>4121507
(1)
>Jess, the next time this man speaks and I don’t like his answer, remove one of his fingers.” You don’t need to dirty your hands while you ask the questions. You have people for that. [Haughty]

(2)
>Jess the Kid deserves a reward, and there is little better opportunity to demonstrate your generosity as liege than by gifting her this fine prize. [Hearty]

>>4121850
Plus supporting this

>>4118110
Previous vote in case of ID change
>>
>>4121507
>> “Jess, the next time this man speaks and I don’t like his answer, remove one of his fingers.” You don’t need to dirty your hands while you ask the questions. You have people for that. [Haughty]

>As the senior member of this party, the animal is yours by right. You will make sure to reward Jess the Kid for her efforts appropriately. [Haughty]
>>
>>4121850
Good idea
>>
>>4121507
> “Answer our questions truthfully and I swear that you shall be released unharmed.” Bandit or not, you do not think you have Sir Gilbern’s stomach for outright torture. [Idealist]

>Jess the Kid deserves a reward, and there is little better opportunity to demonstrate your generosity as liege than by gifting her this fine prize. [Hearty]

I'm thinking he's with the Order of Names.
>>
>>4118054
This is me >>4122446
>>
>>4121507
>(1)
>> “Jess, the next time this man speaks and I don’t like his answer, remove one of his fingers.” You don’t need to dirty your hands while you ask the questions. You have people for that. [Haughty]

>(2) The chestnut Rouncey
>>As the senior member of this party, the animal is yours by right. You will make sure to reward Jess the Kid for her efforts appropriately. [Haughty]
>>
File: Courageous Sky.jpg (117 KB, 800x751)
117 KB
117 KB JPG
> “Answer our questions truthfully and I swear that you shall be released unharmed.” Bandit or not, you do not think you have Sir Gilbern’s stomach for outright torture. [Idealist]

>Jess the Kid deserves a reward, and there is little better opportunity to demonstrate your generosity as liege than by gifting her this fine prize. [Hearty]

The idea to use Courageous Sky to verify the scout’s words is clever, so I will allow you to use your Griffinhawk’s re-roll on this persuasion attempt. As you do not bear the Maid Sinclair’s favour anymore your communication with your Griffinhawk is limited when it comes to details. Nonetheless, they will be able to let you know if they have spotted *something* out of the ordinary.

=========================================

Persuade Roll
> Unreasonable Request / Higher Social Standing 40DC
> Wealth +0 (Penury)
> Attire +0 (Penury)
> Noble Privilege +1 Re-Roll
> Write-in: Courage Sky verification +1 Re-Roll
> No Torture +0DC, +0 Re-Roll, +0 Adverse Re-Roll
> 40DC

Double Fail = A clever lie. Some, if not all, of the information you glean is false.
0 = Perhaps he isn’t what we thought. The man sticks to his story well enough to convince some of your companions, and even you begin to hold doubts.
1 = Honour among thieves. Despite their sinister intentions, the scout does not give his fellows up and your Griffinhawk is unable to narrow down where he was supposed to report back to.
2 = Slip of the tongue. The suspected location of the camp is revealed, but little is known about their numbers or intentions. You will have the option of putting some distance between you, investigating with your scouts or preparing to launch an assault before they realise their scout is missing.
3 = No honour among thieves. Eager to save his own skin, the scout divulges everything he knows about those he was supposed to report back to. This will help flesh out the options available to you.
Double Pass = Caught in a lie. Your promise to release the scout is null and void.


3 rolls of 1d100. You have TWO re-rolls.

Who are they? How many? Where is their camp?
>>
Rolled 29 (1d100)

>>4122629
oofff 40 dc
>>
Rolled 16 (1d100)

>>4122629
Oh well. I hope this doesnt go poorly.
>>
Rolled 83 (1d100)

>>4122629


How would torture have affected the DC?
>>
Rolled 69 (1d100)

>>4122629
>>4122639
Utlising reroll
>>
Rolled 17 (1d100)

>>4122629
>>4122640
Nice but not very nice.

We have a second reroll to spend right? I’ll make use of it.
>>
>>4122644
>courageous skys reroll got it
NOICE
>>
We kinda got lucky. This DC wasnt very nice.
>>
this is just like in the catcombs with the 2nd herald
>>
>>4122629
Gotta get Lady Rabe's or a Cathagi favor ASAP.
>>
>>4122687
Shame we didn't take the chance to introduce him to the Lady Griffin.
>>
>>4122651
Till we finish our penace these non combate rolls are going to suck.
>>
>>4122644
>>4122637
>>4122636
Nice
>>4122696
That vote was a mess, I think if we had two votes one for number of interactions and another for who to interact with we would have talk to her.
>>
File: Legatus Griffinhawk 1.png (109 KB, 400x286)
109 KB
109 KB PNG
That’s some nice rolling.

>No Torture
Gain +1 Step on the Path of Adam [17]
Lose -1 Step on the Path of Cain [3]

>3 Success
>No honour among thieves. Eager to save his own skin, the scout divulges everything he knows about those he was supposed to report back to. This will help flesh out the options available to you

==================================

Although the captured scout is recalcitrant at first, he quickly clues on that the only way he is getting out of this alive is to cooperate to his interrogator’s satisfaction. He was to meet up with a larger patrol of scouts to the south, he reported back to a huntsman of some seniority rather than directly to the chief of brigands. And that is what they surely are, despite this scout ‘Odair’ describing themselves as ‘lordless men-of-fortune’ like they were some famed mercenary company rather than a ragtag bunch of rebels, deserters and runaway serfs not unlike the Bluejays.

These men have been exacting a toll for safe passage on every caravan or passerby they can bully, those that they don’t kill and take for all they’re worth anyway. Brother Cancicail and Brother Gaspard confirm that this stretch of road has reported such troubles for a while now, though the opportunity to prey upon those taking the Kingsroad rather than the many side routes is one that was previously a rare occurrence. Now though, the bandits have apparently been bolstered by men and . With the Order of Names patrols much diminished in this region and the local lords left to police their own lands, the bandits have thrived preying on the borderlands between fiefs and growing in strength with a steady influx of local and foreign men coming out of the Mal Country further north in droves lately.

The scout is unable to answer how they came to know of your convoy, seeing as you left far later than most following the Motte-Fallavon festival. But he gives a detailed descript of what he saw at their previous camp, they number as many as two-score in all but that is rarely ever in one given location unless they are preparing an attack. Despite their numbers, the equipment and discipline of this mob is atrocious by your reckoning and their morale easily shaken. The break-up in scouts reporting to senior huntsmen is a good way to ensure that the capture of any given scout by local enforcers doesn’t immediately compromise the location of their hideout. But most local authorities don’t have a Griffinawk at their bidding. When Courageous Sky returns in the direction that the scout said he was to meet up with , circling a point to south-west in the horizon, you are reasonably sure your feathered friend has found their campsite.

[1/2]
>>
File: Birds-eye-view.jpg (246 KB, 1000x700)
246 KB
246 KB JPG
[2/2]

“We should make for Darbyshire to the south-west. A palisade between us and these bandits is the surest way to protect to our charges.” Sir dan Marc takes his duty as protector of the pilgrims seriously enough to consider discretion as the better part of valour here. It goes unsaid that seeking help from Sinclair is a longshot, and too far away by any reckoning, but the Lord of Darbyshire and its surrounds may be willing to bolster your strength with his own.

”This is not the first instance of brigandry we have encountered on this stretch of the road, especially in the wake of the Motte-Fallavon festival where travellers are ripe for the picking. In the past our orders numbers have only been sufficient to ensure the safety of our charges.” Brother Gaspard rasps, speaking for the Knights Comitas, including Brother Rousseau apparently. “But with our numbers now bolstered with you good sirs, we have an opportunity to clear these ruffians out and secure this stretch of road for years to come.”

“We don’t know enough about them, or their next move. A sudden attack against a score of ill-armed vagabonds will see them flee before us, but two-score could see that go against us if we should be so unlucky.” Your brother advocates that your own scouts keep an eye on them in turn while you wait for the opportune moment to strike, with or without outside help depending on the bandit movements. “When their scout fails to return they will likely break camp, but to launch an attack or just cover their movements from any retribution? If we make for Darbyshire and seek help without tailing them, the ruffians will most likely elude us. If we can track their movements, we will know ahead of time and prepare accordingly.”

Brother Cancicail shakes his head. “If we attack now, before they realise their scout is gone, they will never expect it. Once he fails to report in they will be on high alert and likely consolidate their strength. We should attack now, or not at all. Steal a march on them and get our charges to the safety of Darbyshire or strike when the iron is hot, but we should certainly not squander our element of surprise with more scouting of our own and the risks that entails.”

-----------------------------------------------

> “The last thing these brigands expect is an attack from half-a-dozen armoured knights and any others who would join us. We must strike now, before they realise and have time to prepare.” [Haughty]

> “A dozen of brigands or two-score is a big difference. We cannot commit to any rash action without deploying scouts of our own for more detail. If they are consolidated, we make for Darbyshire. If they are vulnerable, we ride them down.” [Hearty]

> “The well-being of our charges is our top priority. We make for Darbyshire without delay. If the Lord there is sympathetic, we can consider patrolling in force for another sighting.” [Idealist]
>>
>>4122761
>“The last thing these brigands expect is an attack from half-a-dozen armoured knights and any others who would join us. We must strike now, before they realise and have time to prepare.” [Haughty]
>>
*Darbyshire is further west, not south west. My apologies
>>
>>4122761
>> “The last thing these brigands expect is an attack from half-a-dozen armoured knights and any others who would join us. We must strike now, before they realise and have time to prepare.” [Haughty]

>Writein
Instruct whoever is left in the convoy to make for Darbyshire. That way even if we fail, they will be protected.
>>
>>4122761
>> “The last thing these brigands expect is an attack from half-a-dozen armoured knights and any others who would join us. We must strike now, before they realise and have time to prepare.” [Haughty]
>>
>>4122761
>> “The last thing these brigands expect is an attack from half-a-dozen armoured knights and any others who would join us. We must strike now, before they realise and have time to prepare.” [Haughty]
>>
>>4122761
>and any others who would join us
dose father tobrie have a cadre of flagellants at his command or is this referencing jess and our hireling
>>
>>4122761
> “The last thing these brigands expect is an attack from half-a-dozen armoured knights and any others who would join us. We must strike now, before they realise and have time to prepare.” [Haughty]
>>
>>4122761
>> “The last thing these brigands expect is an attack from half-a-dozen armoured knights and any others who would join us. We must strike now, before they realise and have time to prepare.” [Haughty]

And this >>4122769

Forgotten, if our points drop too low, will we lose access to our abilities?

>>4122798
Likely. Or they have some slingshots even.
>>
>>4122761
> “The last thing these brigands expect is an attack from half-a-dozen armoured knights and any others who would join us. We must strike now, before they realise and have time to prepare.” [Haughty]
>>
>>4122803
>forgotten, if our points drop too low, will we lose access to our abilities?
i'd think so as for abilities we gain a new one every time our points double so another cain at 6 and another adam at 24
>>
>>4122754
Huh I would have thought torture was a thorns choice
>>
>>4122761
>> “The well-being of our charges is our top priority. We make for Darbyshire without delay. If the Lord there is sympathetic, we can consider patrolling in force for another sighting.” [Idealist]
>>
>>4122761
> “The last thing these brigands expect is an attack from half-a-dozen armoured knights and any others who would join us. We must strike now, before they realise and have time to prepare.” [Haughty]

Kinda hypocritical to claim our charges safety is more at risk than others if we leave the bandits be. Besides, right now we can hit them without warning. They'll be prepared if the scout doesn't report in.
>>
>>4122798
>>4122761
Spears can be quickly carved from wood, and with us at the forefront they can harry the foe from relative safety with their longer reach.

Or we could see if there's a slinger or two among them. They're peasants, no way they've never knocked down some small game before.

Even if they just throw their spears or send a single volley of stones and then retreat, it will confuse the bandits and make them more likely to misread our numbers and break to be ridden down whilst escaping.
>>
>>4122761
>The last thing these brigands expect is an attack from half-a-dozen armoured knights and any others who would join us. We must strike now, before they realise and have time to prepare.” [Haughty]

The Almighty wills it!

>>4122230
Previous vote in case of ID change
>>
>>4122761
> “The last thing these brigands expect is an attack from half-a-dozen armoured knights and any others who would join us. We must strike now, before they realise and have time to prepare.” [Haughty]

We can always be satisfied with reducing their forces before regrouping to Darbyshire to gather more men to finish them off.

Optics wise, we could use some good press regarding Damien and killing bandits.
>>
>>4122761
The last thing these brigands expect is an attack from half-a-dozen armoured knights and any others who would join us. We must strike now, before they realise and have time to prepare.” [Haughty]

>Writein
Instruct whoever is left in the convoy to make for Darbyshire. That way even if we fail, they will be protected

>>4122769
That was my idea as well father and friends can look after then well we go purging.

Now where is my last vote
>>4121742
This is me.
>>
>>4122761
>“The last thing these brigands expect is an attack from half-a-dozen armoured knights and any others who would join us. We must strike now, before they realise and have time to prepare.” [Haughty]

>“A dozen of brigands or two-score is a big difference. We cannot commit to any rash action without deploying scouts of our own for more detail. If they are consolidated, we make for Darbyshire. If they are vulnerable, we ride them down.” [Hearty]

Both are fine by me but let's have scouts always be ahead of our army while we match to earn us of anything.
>>
>>4122761
>> “The last thing these brigands expect is an attack from half-a-dozen armoured knights and any others who would join us. We must strike now, before they realise and have time to prepare.” [Haughty]
>>
>>4122761
>> “The last thing these brigands expect is an attack from half-a-dozen armoured knights and any others who would join us. We must strike now, before they realise and have time to prepare.” [Haughty]
>>
>>4122761
>“A dozen of brigands or two-score is a big difference. We cannot commit to any rash action without deploying scouts of our own for more detail. If they are consolidated, we make for Darbyshire. If they are vulnerable, we ride them down.” [Hearty]

>>4122754
Cain condones torture even after what happened to his own mother? That's kinda messed up.

>>4122815
I think it would've been Path of Thorns if we ordered Jess to torture him. Cain I think at least would've tortured people himself rather than have someone else do it for him.
>>
>>4122761
>“The last thing these brigands expect is an attack from half-a-dozen armoured knights and any others who would join us. We must strike now, before they realise and have time to prepare.” [Haughty]

>>4122769
This
>>
>>4123128
I guess it treads that fine line, Caine is about punishing the wicked and enemies of mankind with all the wrath you can muster wheras thorns is the pragmatic path that cares little for innocence or decency.

Tldr: Caine will do it to bandits, thorny Kniggas would do it to peasants
>>
>>4122761
>“The well-being of our charges is our top priority. We make for Darbyshire without delay. If the Lord there is sympathetic, we can consider patrolling in force for another sighting.” [Idealist]
>>
File: Khorne_by_alexboca.jpg (195 KB, 985x703)
195 KB
195 KB JPG
>>4123140

PEASANT BLOOD MAKES ME . . .

t H O R N Y
>>
>>4122761
>“A dozen of brigands or two-score is a big difference. We cannot commit to any rash action without deploying scouts of our own for more detail. If they are consolidated, we make for Darbyshire. If they are vulnerable, we ride them down.” [Hearty]
>>
>>4122761
>“A dozen of brigands or two-score is a big difference. We cannot commit to any rash action without deploying scouts of our own for more detail. If they are consolidated, we make for Darbyshire. If they are vulnerable, we ride them down.” [Hearty]
>>
>>4122761
>“The last thing these brigands expect is an attack from half-a-dozen armoured knights and any others who would join us. We must strike now, before they realise and have time to prepare.” [Haughty]

>>4122769
Supporting. Derbyshire is quite close right? Have Sir dan Marc take them there. He knows the area of the land very well.
>>
>>4123160
I'll support that. He is the one most concerned about them, too.
>>
>>4123112
>earn
Warn*
>>
>>4123160
Thats one entire knight down. When we have so few, I'd rather not. I expect our Adam aligned priestess to stay behind and im sure she can lead the pilgrims to safety.
>>
>>4122761
>“The last thing these brigands expect is an attack from half-a-dozen armoured knights and any others who would join us. We must strike now, before they realise and have time to prepare.” [Haughty]
>>
>>4122761
Would go with haughty on this as long we have scouts marching ahead of our main force. Even if they're consolidated, a mob of bandits with atrocious discipline, equipment, morale, and training would be in a big disadvantage against a surprise assault by an elite and professional military order of well equipped, well trained, and very disciplined knights with high morale like the Knights Comitas.

>''In war, numbers alone confer no advantage. Do not advance relying on mere sheer numbers.''

- Sun Tzu, Art of War

People tend to really underestimate quality and overestimate quantity in war.
>>
>>4123215
war is about momentum and tempo it's not a mathematical equation
>>
>>4123215
Don't forget experience too. These bandits have likely never been in an actual battle before. Bandits don't directly attack soldiers or groups who can fight back. They prefer to prey on defenceless targets through either demanding safe passage tolls or just straight up murdering them then taking all of their belongings. There's a good chance many will just flee rather than fight.
>>
considering they have recently been gaining strength i wonder if they are being led by a charismatic thorny knight
>>
Considering that they should not have come across our convoy, anyone else suspect Bluejays passed the info along.
>>
>>4123240
well 4 parties could of told them
bluejays
men under the vancewells/hewitts
or our ex tracker survived the queensmen
>>
>>4123243
I'm unsure about our ex-tracker. After running from the Queensmen and getting hunted by the order of names, I do not expect them to run towards civilisation where they could reasonably expect to see our convoy leave.

Likewise under the vancewells and hewitts unless they have actually stayed put during the whole time we were in the forest.

Reasonably, the only group with knowledge of our leaving schedule would be the bluejays (through their tracker who would have known we have a convoy to return to and that they know when we left the fae enclave) and with the lead time to act on it.
>>
>>4123240
I think it's either Craig of Lowgrove, Sir Marco Hewitt (we're right at the border of his home duchy), or someone else. I don't see why it would be the Wytes. Associating with highway bandits who attack and steal from poor, defenseless travelers doesn't aid their cause or image.
>>
>>4123251
i don't know low grove gave me obdiah hackswill(sharpe) vibes he seem like the sort of guy who get focused on the MC and wants revenge
>>
>>4123255
Actually, it's Sir Marco Hewitt who wants revenge.

>Rivals and enemies
>-Sir Marco Hewitt is a sore loser over our victory in the joust.

This is from the General Plots & Intrigue pastebin. I highly suspect it was he who sent the hired blades after us in the Fallavon woods.
>>
>>4123263
>inb4 it's all of them
>>
>>4123263
but lady vancewell succeeded in her intrigue roll though
>>
>>4123255
Certainly, if he had the chance. He would most certainly fuck us over. I'm just not sure he'd have the opportunity to do so.

>>4123252
>>4123263
No, I do not believe so. Craig has been directly linked to Lady Vancewell. His cloak and description matched the one who tried to cut our straps in the melee. So its likely she funded the assassination attempt with out bad 0 roll in the banquet.

Likewise, its with out bad double in the rolls with the Bluejays which lead me to suspect this mischief. You can call them freedom fighters as well but they are functionally bandits as well and hence likely have contact with other unsavoury characters and groups.
>>
They are almost certainly being lead by a knight or Langlish mercenary, their swelling numbers is a direct correlation of the purge of the ruins and their surroundings, it explains why the scout is equipped with a rouncey.

I don't see any evidence of Hewitt or Craig being involved in this due to a lack of evidence but I wouldn't put it past forgotten.
>>
>>4123269
I think that was something completely unrelated.

>>4123269
>>4123270
>>4123272
I'm basing it based on the info we have from Craig. Here it is for anyone wondering.

>-It was revealed that the saboteur was Craig of Lowgrove who according to him was hired by a Langlishman or a Pascae merchant dressed as one, recognized by Sir dan Marc, to sabotage our shield and later ambush us in the woods.

>”It wasn’t no local, m’lord. He talked funny, and had clothes of the fancy sort. Coin were odd too, had a stamp on it that I didn’t recognise like a leaf. He uh, he… shaved but left hair on the lip. Never told me his name.” (Craig of Lowgrove)

>”I don’t know, m’lord! He was the one what would find me, I swear it! I was to round up a few rough sorts and follow you into the woods. He’s the one what suggested I speak to the priest! Once you was well out of the way I was, uh… well, we was to…”(Craig of Lowgrove)

>”The man he describes, this ‘agent’. I’d bet my blade it’s a Langlishman, or a Pascae that fancies himself one.” (Sir dan Marc)

>>”Not necessarily, sire. Pascae merchants come through here carrying their coinage often enough, it’s an anchor. Or some ship if it’s an older print, I remember because I was conned out once with clipped coins. Langlish folk often find good money as intermediaries in these sorts of low affairs. If good coin is to be had, they’ll not think twice about fronting such skull-duggery.”(Sir dan Marc)

>-The agent has a big mustache. the man’s hair appears to have conglomerated from across his body to a single curled lip of hair that is waxed to a sheen.

>”Uh, right m’lord. The man what hired me had liphair like that, but I ent seen him so far.” (Craig of Lowgrove)

>*The agent knew to approach Father Towbray to get near us.
>*The agent knew we would go into the woods.
>*The sigil of Sir Marco Hewitt of Pascae, is an anchor in red and blue.

This makes me suspect Sir Marco Hewitt a lot. Remember that he's a wealthy copper clipper. He has more than enough coin to send thugs after us multiple times.
>>
>>4123215
Jess tho.
>>
>>4123295
???
>>
I don't think Craig has anything to do with these bandits. He's likely either dead or still in the woods trying to survive and fend off the Queensmen. I'll be surprised if he already managed to leave the wild.
>>
>>4123279
Nah Dude I agree with you Craig was involved in the sabotaging of our shield strap although weither or not that was definatively lady Vancewell is still in up for debate.

My suspicion is that it was her but we lack definitive proof.

But I will disagree on this bandit camp being a direct plot against us, it seems to be an organic coincidence strengthened by the collateral of the ruins and the Order of names mop up efforts
>>
>>4123299
As a scout.
>>
>>4123329
Anon, Jess is a fae kid who has been fending off monsters like the basilisk with nothing more than a sling and surviving alone in the wild of the deep Fallavon forests ever since she was a child. Every time she went somewhere she had to track and pathfind on her own ever since she was exiled. I don't think it's a good comparison to compare a bunch of bandits who prey on unsuspected travelers on the road to someone like her.
>>
>>4122761
>> “The last thing these brigands expect is an attack from half-a-dozen armoured knights and any others who would join us. We must strike now, before they realise and have time to prepare.” [Haughty]
and this >>4122769
>>
>>4122761
>> “The last thing these brigands expect is an attack from half-a-dozen armoured knights and any others who would join us. We must strike now, before they realise and have time to prepare.” [Haughty]
>>
>>4122761
> “The last thing these brigands expect is an attack from half-a-dozen armoured knights and any others who would join us. We must strike now, before they realise and have time to prepare.” [Haughty]
>>
Now lads, I could rush this and try to get the battle out of the way before the end of the weekend but I would prefer that we continue this at a natural pace. Even if that means that we have to split up the battle rolls between each day.
>>
>>4125139
I'm fine with that
>>
>>4125139
Whatever you like and suits you best Forgotten.
>>
> “The last thing these brigands expect is an attack from half-a-dozen armoured knights and any others who would join us. We must strike now, before they realise and have time to prepare.” [Haughty]

“The last thing these brigands expect is an attack from half-a-dozen armoured knights and any others who would join us.” There are several nods of agreement. “We must strike now, before they realise and have time to prepare.”

“The pilgrims should make for Darbyshire as we prepare, they will be safe behind the town walls if this should go awry.” This bandit scout will go with them for now. Your sworn man had voiced his concern, and so you select him for the task of protecting the pilgrims. “Sir dan Marc, I will charge you with this duty.”

“With Reginae’s grace sirs, we will find our own way. I suspect that you will need every able swordhand when the moment is at hand.” Sister Superior Ignatius makes the cupped sign of Salve Reginae, already the convoy is stirring back into hurried movement. “We will pray for your safety, and make what preparations we can for any wounded.”

“Our thanks, Sister. We would be remiss without Sir dan Marc riding with us on the eve of battle.” The Green Knight bows, a rare display of obeisance to piety from your brother. You suspect he is somewhat smitten with the nun, never a good thing. “What of the priest?”

[1/2]
>>
[2/2]

“Father Towbray, you mean to join us?” You look askance behind him at the half-dozen pilgrims of a more zealous persuasion that come armed with little more than faith, some hefty cudgels and some wickedly adjusted flails. These men are eager, but in a way that is quite unlike the bravado and camaraderie that you have seen in your previous campaign with Father. There is a mad fire in their eyes, the look of the fanatic.

“No soldier of Heaven is ever unarmed for battle, faithful son of Adam.” Father Towbray smiles, donning the signature cowl of the Reclaimant Fanatic of his faith. Stripped to his waist, the wiry middle-aged priest displays the old and new scars of penitence upon his whole body as marks of pride. “Surely you would not deny the faithful a chance to reclaim this small piece of the Kingdom of Heaven from the faithless? Our faith shall protect us, and the Almighty will welcome those whose time has come with open arms, should it be their joyous fate.”

The prospect of an inglorious death at the hands of lowly bandits is not one that you would describe as joyous, but as you know that this is a fault in the strength of your faith. Of course martyrdom in the service of the Kingdom of Heaven is a good and noble thing, no matter the foe. If the zeal that Father Towbray and his closest followers exhibit gives you pause, it will doubtless terrify the faithless bandits you will soon face.

“These bandits have plagued good pilgrims and innocent folk too long, this is our chance to make things right. You all know your part to play.” You look around at the faces staring back at you. Scared pilgrims, eager fanatics and knights both seasons and fresh. You try to think of what Father would say.

========================================

>“I am proud to fight alongside each man of you. It is in moments like these, with men like us, that the strength of Cantôn is made manifest.” [Haughty]

>“A pint of Darbyshire’s finest ale to each man of you once the day is ours, so make sure you live long enough to collect it.” [Hearty]

>”Chapter II, Verse LXI ‘He who should stand with me shall forever be my brother’. Let Cain guide your blade and Adam guard your heart. The Almighty Wills It.”
>>
>>4125158
>>”Chapter II, Verse LXI ‘He who should stand with me shall forever be my brother’. Let Cain guide your blade and Adam guard your heart. The Almighty Wills It.” [Idealist]
>>
>>4125158
>Father Towbray wants to join us.

Badass. Reminds me of that priest companion of William the Conqueror who fought at the battle of Hastings with a freaking club.
>>
>>4125158
>”Chapter II, Verse LXI ‘He who should stand with me shall forever be my brother’. Let Cain guide your blade and Adam guard your heart. The Almighty Wills It.”
>>
>>4125158
>>”Chapter II, Verse LXI ‘He who should stand with me shall forever be my brother’. Let Cain guide your blade and Adam guard your heart. The Almighty Wills It.”
>>
>>4125158
>”Chapter II, Verse LXI ‘He who should stand with me shall forever be my brother’. Let Cain guide your blade and Adam guard your heart. The Almighty Wills It.”
>>
>>4125158
>>“I am proud to fight alongside each man of you. It is in moments like these, with men like us, that the strength of Cantôn is made manifest.” [Haughty]
>>
>>4123112
Me
>>
>>4125158
>>”Chapter II, Verse LXI ‘He who should stand with me shall forever be my brother’. Let Cain guide your blade and Adam guard your heart. The Almighty Wills It.”
>>
>>4125158
>”Chapter II, Verse LXI ‘He who should stand with me shall forever be my brother’. Let Cain guide your blade and Adam guard your heart. The Almighty Wills It.”
>>
>>4125158
>>4125158
>”Chapter II, Verse LXI ‘He who should stand with me shall forever be my brother’. Let Cain guide your blade and Adam guard your heart. The Almighty Wills It.”
>>
anychance we'll see combat this weekend forgotten?
>>
>>4125158
>”Chapter II, Verse LXI ‘He who should stand with me shall forever be my brother’. Let Cain guide your blade and Adam guard your heart. The Almighty Wills It.”

Jess should take advantage of the element of surprise and find a good vantage point like when she climbed the tree.
>>
>>4125158
>”Chapter II, Verse LXI ‘He who should stand with me shall forever be my brother’. Let Cain guide your blade and Adam guard your heart. The Almighty Wills It.”
>>
>>4125214
Probably no combat rolls this weekend, I have some IRL stuff that is hard to form a proper schedule around.
>>
>>4123160
This is me
>>
>>4125158
>”Chapter II, Verse LXI ‘He who should stand with me shall forever be my brother’. Let Cain guide your blade and Adam guard your heart. The Almighty Wills It.”
>>
>>4125158
>”Chapter II, Verse LXI ‘He who should stand with me shall forever be my brother’. Let Cain guide your blade and Adam guard your heart. The Almighty Wills It.”

Almighty Vult!
>>
>>4125158
>>”Chapter II, Verse LXI ‘He who should stand with me shall forever be my brother’. Let Cain guide your blade and Adam guard your heart. The Almighty Wills It.”
>>
I always wondered Forgotten. How powerful is House Andrei exactly? How many men can they raise? Do they have any vassals? How fertile is their lands? How wealthy are they? I imagine Emile would have a pretty good idea of his house's strength so I don't think this would be OOC metagaming info.
>>
File: VvC.png (381 KB, 2926x2140)
381 KB
381 KB PNG
Work in progress

need feeback
>>
>>4125316
Already a 10/10. Give Emile a shield for maximum CAPTAIN CANTON and add a visored barbute/barbuta too.
>>
>>4125316
As a general rule for virgin vs chad memes - the points should be condensed. You're looking to write like a hundred for both of them
Most of these aren't very funny.
>>
>>4125316
>You actually created an image of my shitty meme

I'm in tears. Thanks anon. Also saved
>>
>>4125316
Put a dirty ribbon on Sinclair's head.
>>
>>4125316
Saved. I love my players
>>
>>4125316
Add Sinclair's lucky charm vs Emile's URSEN bear totem. Also I think the original unedited points were funnier >>4116096
>>
File: The Known World by Mapbro.png (3.77 MB, 2096x1246)
3.77 MB
3.77 MB PNG
>>4125307

>Power standing
As raised in the initial fleshing out, House Andrei is old and prestigious but much fallen from grace. They were one of the five major houses before the fall of Romaine, ruling over thousands rather than hundreds of souls. The Night of Three Sisters hit them particularly hard, forcing the survivors to flee in exile to this remote holding on their old borders. They are reduced from ‘mighty’ to fairly standard compared to other houses.
They are by no means a major house like Alderague or Sinclair but are probably closer in strength to Rabe, Glasdale and Hewitt. Due to your Father’s rule, the military power of the house in been restored to pre-War of Borders strength but the political influence of your house has waned.

>Manpower
A dozen anointed and proven knights, Father's inner circle.
80 sergeant-men-at-arms, squires, men-at-arms and similar competent soldiers.
In extremis, roughly 200-300 levies can be raised (unfit for duty and wounded veterans form part of this). Outside of the militaristic Romaine Duchy and Professional Aubrey, the levies are usually a much larger portion than the standing soldiery.

>Vassals
None. Historically, houses like Glasdale were actually your vassals prior to the loss of Ardenne. There are three such vassals that survived the fall and gained independence (or switched loyalties); Glasdale, Solym and Vidra. Mother is from House Vidra though desu I have done little on their potential involvement other than House Vidra being located on an island in the south Romaine coastal region.
There is legal grounds to resume this vassalage status, but in reality these houses (or their backers) are in fact stronger or more influential than their old liege. And doing so would risk the Duchess beginning to view your house as a rival rather than irrelevant.

> Fertile / Wealth
Like much of Romaine, your lands are blessed with fertile fields and your family’s wealth is drawn almost entirely from agrarian sources. If not for the constant threat of the undead it’s deadly toll on each generation, your lands would be as vibrant and productive as the Aubrey breadbasket fiefs. The drain on the family’s coffers to military armament leaves little room for new projects and maintaining existing infrastructure. You are not rich, but you are not so impoverished either.

Hopefully that answers your questions, though I'm happy to answer what I can if you guys have more. I do my best not to be inconsistent, so if I do recall something incorrectly please don't hesitate to call my bullshit out.
>>
>>4125158
>”Chapter II, Verse LXI ‘He who should stand with me shall forever be my brother’. Let Cain guide your blade and Adam guard your heart. The Almighty Wills It.”

We cut through the bandits and the flagellants come behind us screaming and praising the brothers behind us to mopping up the survivors giving us time to turn around and charge again.
>>
>>4125358
>Vassals
>None

I should clarify that there is a difference between landed knights like Sir dan Marc's father (of which your father has many) and hereditary vassals.
>>
>>4125358
So our house is pretty powerful militarily, weak politically, and average/decent geographically due to the deadmen.

I didn't know that House Glasdale were once our vassals. Interesting.

Thanks for all the answers Forgotten. I'll leave it to other anons to point out anything incorrect or inconsistent that you've made.
>>
>>4125358
roughly 200-300 levies can be raised (unfit for duty and wounded veterans form part of this). Outside of the militaristic Romaine Duchy and Professional Aubrey, the levies are usually a much larger portion than the standing soldiery
fuck considering the deadmen and this it's no wonder emilie is softer then most on the peasantry seeing them more as loyal comrades/servants then tax chattel/slaves as larger duchies would
>>
>>4125358
>>4125366
Saving all of this info btw.
>>
>>4125358
Where's Ardenne?
>>
>>4125373
That would be the region directly east of Romaine up to and including the extremely large lake (or small sea?) north of the Deepwood.
>>
File: Ardenne.png (3.77 MB, 2096x1246)
3.77 MB
3.77 MB PNG
>>4125379
Wait this area?

holy hell thats a loss
>>
>TFW you realize holy blonde puss has more soul than soulless ginger puss

A shitty meme by me for you knightfu anon.
>>
>>4125391
ABSOLUTE KEK
>>
File: 1583580672558.png (979 KB, 975x628)
979 KB
979 KB PNG
Forgotten, give me a quick rundown on this island
Is it stashed with magical artifacts? Ancient boss enemy? Another son of sin?
>>
File: Map Bro - Lost Ardenne.png (3.79 MB, 2096x1246)
3.79 MB
3.79 MB PNG
>>4125391
I don't care if this will start another tit-for-tat about the Maid of Orleans, I love this shitty meme.

>>4125389
At the height of Ardenne, Romaine was nearly a kingdom unto itself and set to challenge Aubrey for the rule of the continent entire.
>>
File: Dread hosts of Ardenne.jpg (256 KB, 1560x860)
256 KB
256 KB JPG
>>4125394
You mean the Isle of the Damned? That dread keep from where the damnation of all Ardenne was spawned in a single unholy night that scholars cannot agree lasted days, weeks, months or years?

Yes.
>>
>>4125395
Hotdamn reclaiming Ardenne would almost certainly gurantee us a legend.

Ardenne was an inside job!
>>
>>4125400
So where they keep Sin himself, gotcha
>>
File: shields.jpg (62 KB, 599x438)
62 KB
62 KB JPG
newest meme
>>
>>4125395
Speaking of the Kingdom Forgotten have the Kings of Canton always been from the same dynasty? Who was the first King given that Adam and Cain bore no children?
>>
>>4125467
Nice and saved.
>>
>>4125469
The first King was the last Generalis Rex, essentially a 'Super Duke' elected to co-ordinate the efforts of the faithful human forces in the War of Names generations after the days of Adam and Cain.

Since then, enjoying the divine right to rule with the blood of successive Mater Reginates flowing through their veins, the dynasty has persisted since the end of the War of Names. The title is patrilineal, but there have been cases in extremis where an heir was elected by the Five Duchies. By ancient church law this heir is always a scion of the Aubrey House though, so the dynasty remains largely unbroken after 600 years since the end of the War of Names.
>>
>>4125158
>>”Chapter II, Verse LXI ‘He who should stand with me shall forever be my brother’. Let Cain guide your blade and Adam guard your heart. The Almighty Wills It.”
>>
>>4125484
>>4122802
This is me
>>
>>4125481
So basically pre-War of Names the five Duchies were independent of each other or was there like a loose federation?
>>
>>4125467
Great
>>
>>4125492
Well the individual identities of the Duchies hadn't evolved by that point, at this stage in history the commanders and generals of the various liberating legions carved out new lands for their men to settle.

Perhaps it's more akin to the various successor kingdoms following the death of Alexander the Great, if you gave them a common threat to keep them cooperative.
>>
>>4125481
>Mater Reginates

are these the to be queens? how did this even start?
>>
>>4125498
The head of the Church has traditionally been female since the days of Salve Reginae, elected by the prominent clergy across the continent, but it wasn’t until the formation of the Kingdom that the union of church and state became literal.

In theory the wife of a new King (and the new Mater Reginae herself) is chosen from a pool of particularly pious and spiritual women from one of the many cloisters. In reality, the daughters of noble houses with close links to the church more often than not tend to have an large presence in those pools about the time when an old king looks like they are on their way out.

The power of a king that survives his wife to select a new bride from that pool is at the discretion of the Elector Dukes/Duchess, and wars have been fought over this very issue.
>>
>>4125467
Blessed and saved
>>
>>4125526
That's an interesting way in meddling in the power of the crown by diluting the power the king has over his vassals.
>>
>>4125158
>”Chapter II, Verse LXI ‘He who should stand with me shall forever be my brother’. Let Cain guide your blade and Adam guard your heart. The Almighty Wills It.”

It is time to go cain on these foes
>>4123077
This is me
>>
>>4125358
> Mother is from House Vidra though desu I have done little on their potential involvement other than House Vidra being located on an island in the south Romaine coastal region.

Right on the sea lane for shipping trade that I discussed last thread? This makes sense why our Mother is so much better at the economic and political side of things. A closer alliance with Vidra through marriage also makes sense as it can provide better opportunities for building up House Andrei economically as we can sell our surplus grain product easily through their ports to minimize loss from transport time.

While in Cathag we should see if we can make any contacts or find out if there's a cash crop market. Maybe Damien could send us some specialty stuff to offer as a gift to the Dragon, see if he likes it.

I know some people are resistant to making money, but this is also a duty we have to our house to represent and show off what we produce. Other than beatstick Knights.
>>
>>4125401
We need a much larger force for that.
>>
>>4125395
>>4125391
>>4120635
Just gonna point out that Joan of Arc is most definitely not for Lewds
>>
>>4125158
>”Chapter II, Verse LXI ‘He who should stand with me shall forever be my brother’. Let Cain guide your blade and Adam guard your heart. The Almighty Wills It.”
>>
>>4125977
>>4125358
In fact, re: Damiens return home

We should see if we can find a Vidra merchant ship to send him home on, probably be cheaper and safer since we have a blood relation.
>>
>>4125984
For sure. She's only for pure!
>>
>>4125158


>>4122448

>This is me
>”Chapter II, Verse LXI ‘He who should stand with me shall forever be my brother’. Let Cain guide your blade and Adam guard your heart. The Almighty Wills It.”

>>4122448
Pure propaganda.
>>
>>4126142
Propaganda wins wars tho

> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mIegk9Ukx4k
>>
>>4125158
>>”Chapter II, Verse LXI ‘He who should stand with me shall forever be my brother’. Let Cain guide your blade and Adam guard your heart. The Almighty Wills It.”
>>
File: Into the woods, again.jpg (489 KB, 1175x1500)
489 KB
489 KB JPG
>”Chapter II, Verse LXI ‘He who should stand with me shall forever be my brother’. Let Cain guide your blade and Adam guard your heart. The Almighty Wills It.”
> Idealistic audience: Persuasion auto-success
> Righteous Zeal +10DC to Battle Progress


“Chapter II, Verse LXI ‘He who should stand with me shall forever be my brother’.” So spoke the brothers to the multitude of downtrodden slaves when the masters sought to persecute them. So few listened then, and now a nation heeds their words. A nation of good and pious men like these. “Let Cain guide your blade and Adam guard your heart. The Almighty Wills It.”

“The Almighty Wills It!” Comes the resounding reply.

Your force is small, but virtuous and assured that theirs is the righteous cause. It is no Liberating Legion of the Brothers of old, but it will do for the task ahead.

...

Several hours later – Dusk

The bandit encampment is settling down for the night, there appears to be no raised alarm. You watch with Mikail from a concealed lip of the woody hill at the state of the makeshift camp, about as organised as a hog’s den and just as pleasant to the eye. It provides some choice opportunity for you to educate Mikail on how -not- to set up a military encampment. Not all are run-of-the-mill forest bullies, some of the bandits are clearly veterans of something or other, a few have the telltale signs of a Langlish mercenary down on his luck. As military men, even deserters, they really should know better.

[1/2]
>>
File: bandit camp.png (854 KB, 1024x507)
854 KB
854 KB PNG
[2/2]

There is no hurried movement or state of alert, indeed the ones wearing their armour only seem to do so because they cannot trust their fellows to refrain from stealing it. Clearly the brigands had not expected their scout back until after dark, though he will doubtless be considered overdue soon. Disturbingly, you notice a handful of women among the camp and even some children. They do not appear to be prisoners. Still, the presence of non-combatants is an issue that sets your nerves on edge. The lack of any obvious prisoners is also a curiosity, a bandit force of this size would have been taking rich pickings following the festival by your reckoning. And could they really have ransomed back any such hostages so quickly?

It is hard to tell their exact numbers with some tents occupied, but you suspect a score-and-a-half of them all up. That would mean that the better half of their estimated strength is here and leaves your strike force outnumbered near three-to-one, but you are certain that this rabble will break quickly if you overawe them. But should your assault lag, should they realise in full the advantage they hold in numbers, you might bite off more than you can chew. They will have little stomach for a fight where they have nothing to gain, but taking a number of knights ransom could be a powerful motivator for the greedy.

”Adam’s teeth, witch! Where’d you come from?” Your squire hisses at the crouching Jess, having materialised out of thin air apparently. She puts a finger to where the mouth on her mask should be, then raises four human-length fingers and points out the lookouts she has identified on the main flat trail leading uphill into the encampment.

“Quiet lad, let’s not give the game away. Good work, Jess. Are the others in position?” A sharp nod of her inhuman mask is your answer. Everything is set then; the hour is nigh.

==============================================

> If your trackers can remove the lookouts on the main approach your whole force could ride up the path near unopposed. Even if they fail, the advantage of the charge is well worth the volley or two you will have to endure before closing in. [Haughty] + [Tracking Roll]

>A charge through the forest proper could be treacherous, but they would never expect a mounted threat to come from that direction. If Hannibal can keep his footing, you would be amongst them in moments. And it would be glorious. [Hearty] + [Riding Roll]

>If you sacrifice your mounted advantage, you could use your pathfinding skills to circle around and find a way to lead your force into the encampment on foot. Already running amok in their ranks, the element of surprise would be amplified. [Idealist] + [Pathfinder Roll]
>>
>>4127073
>> If your trackers can remove the lookouts on the main approach your whole force could ride up the path near unopposed. Even if they fail, the advantage of the charge is well worth the volley or two you will have to endure before closing in. [Haughty] + [Tracking Roll]
>>
>>4127073
> If your trackers can remove the lookouts on the main approach your whole force could ride up the path near unopposed. Even if they fail, the advantage of the charge is well worth the volley or two you will have to endure before closing in. [Haughty] + [Tracking Roll]
>>
>>4127118
Me>>4125557
>>
>>4127073
>If you sacrifice your mounted advantage, you could use your pathfinding skills to circle around and find a way to lead your force into the encampment on foot. Already running amok in their ranks, the element of surprise would be amplified. [Idealist] + [Pathfinder Roll]

FUCK ARCHERS.
>>
>>4127073
>>A charge through the forest proper could be treacherous, but they would never expect a mounted threat to come from that direction. If Hannibal can keep his footing, you would be amongst them in moments. And it would be glorious. [Hearty] + [Riding Roll]
>>
>>4127070
>Several hours later – Dusk
dusk and dawn are the best times for an attack
>>
>>4127073
Huh. I mean.

If we could act quickly to sieze the non-combatants we could maybe get them to surrender right away.

We were just talking about re-taking Ardenne and whatnot, depending on how negotiations go we could maybe send these people back to Romaine to work our lands. We do lose people to Deadman attacks a lot of the time.

Probably not get any wealth from the battle, though, if we did that.

Anyways given the number of pilgrims with us on foot I'm voting

>If you sacrifice your mounted advantage, you could use your pathfinding skills to circle around and find a way to lead your force into the encampment on foot. Already running amok in their ranks, the element of surprise would be amplified. [Idealist] + [Pathfinder Roll]

Jess has great skills to aid us with this, and it'll keep our forces together.
>>
ill remind you guys mounted is a 10 dc bonus 25 when charging
>>
>>4127139
Fair point

>>4127073
Changing >>4127118 to >A charge through the forest proper could be treacherous, but they would never expect a mounted threat to come from that direction. If Hannibal can keep his footing, you would be amongst them in moments. And it would be glorious. [Hearty] + [Riding Roll]
>>
>>4127146
pretty sure yours includes a cav charge i was more talking about idealist which is the dismount option
Hearty is the greatest risk greatest reward option as it combines the sneakyness of idealist with cav charge of haughty though the dc will be hard
>>
>>4127073
>> If your trackers can remove the lookouts on the main approach your whole force could ride up the path near unopposed. Even if they fail, the advantage of the charge is well worth the volley or two you will have to endure before closing in. [Haughty] + [Tracking Roll]
>>
>>4127073

>If you sacrifice your mounted advantage, you could use your pathfinding skills to circle around and find a way to lead your force into the encampment on foot. Already running amok in their ranks, the element of surprise would be amplified. [Idealist] + [Pathfinder Roll]
>>
>>4115891
>>4114090
Me

>>4127073
>If your trackers can remove the lookouts on the main approach your whole force could ride up the path near unopposed. Even if they fail, the advantage of the charge is well worth the volley or two you will have to endure before closing in. [Haughty] + [Tracking Roll]
>>
>>4127073
>> If your trackers can remove the lookouts on the main approach your whole force could ride up the path near unopposed. Even if they fail, the advantage of the charge is well worth the volley or two you will have to endure before closing in. [Haughty] + [Tracking Roll]
>>
>>4127139
A tactical advantage for one knight isn't worth giving up strategic superiority.
>>
>>4127218
it is when winning this engagement is all about speed we have to smash them in the first rounds while we have initiative. it even states in the update that getting bogged down will lose us the fight we have to hit hard we have to be mobile
>>
>>4127223
Except we have a bunch of pilgrims with us. That already limits our mobility.

As for smashing them quickly, doing so with our full force at once won't give them time to see that only a few of us are actually Knights.
>>
>>4127073
>If your trackers can remove the lookouts on the main approach your whole force could ride up the path near unopposed. Even if they fail, the advantage of the charge is well worth the volley or two you will have to endure before closing in. [Haughty] + [Tracking Roll]
>>
>>4127073
>If you sacrifice your mounted advantage, you could use your pathfinding skills to circle around and find a way to lead your force into the encampment on foot. Already running amok in their ranks, the element of surprise would be amplified. [Idealist] + [Pathfinder Roll]

>>4121700
>>4104327
This is me.
>>
>>4127073
>If your trackers can remove the lookouts on the main approach your whole force could ride up the path near unopposed. Even if they fail, the advantage of the charge is well worth the volley or two you will have to endure before closing in. [Haughty] + [Tracking Roll]
>>
>>4127073
>If you sacrifice your mounted advantage, you could use your pathfinding skills to circle around and find a way to lead your force into the encampment on foot. Already running amok in their ranks, the element of surprise would be amplified. [Idealist] + [Pathfinder Roll]
>>
>>4127073
>If you sacrifice your mounted advantage, you could use your pathfinding skills to circle around and find a way to lead your force into the encampment on foot. Already running amok in their ranks, the element of surprise would be amplified. [Idealist] + [Pathfinder Roll]
>>
>>4127073
>If your trackers can remove the lookouts on the main approach your whole force could ride up the path near unopposed. Even if they fail, the advantage of the charge is well worth the volley or two you will have to endure before closing in. [Haughty] + [Tracking Roll]

Going in dismounted means losing not just the mounted advantage of Emile and his companions but also for all the Knights Comitas. I rather keep it than amplify the surprise advantage.
>>
>>4127073
>>If you sacrifice your mounted advantage, you could use your pathfinding skills to circle around and find a way to lead your force into the encampment on foot. Already running amok in their ranks, the element of surprise would be amplified. [Idealist] + [Pathfinder Roll]
>>
>>4127073
>If your trackers can remove the lookouts on the main approach your whole force could ride up the path near unopposed. Even if they fail, the advantage of the charge is well worth the volley or two you will have to endure before closing in. [Haughty] + [Tracking Roll]
>>
>>4127073

> If your trackers can remove the lookouts on the main approach your whole force could ride up the path near unopposed. Even if they fail, the advantage of the charge is well worth the volley or two you will have to endure before closing in. [Haughty] + [Tracking Roll]
>>
>>4127073
>If your trackers can remove the lookouts on the main approach your whole force could ride up the path near unopposed. Even if they fail, the advantage of the charge is well worth the volley or two you will have to endure before closing in. [Haughty] + [Tracking Roll]
>>
>>4127073
>>If you sacrifice your mounted advantage, you could use your pathfinding skills to circle around and find a way to lead your force into the encampment on foot. Already running amok in their ranks, the element of surprise would be amplified. [Idealist] + [Pathfinder Roll]
>>
>>4127073
>If your trackers can remove the lookouts on the main approach your whole force could ride up the path near unopposed. Even if they fail, the advantage of the charge is well worth the volley or two you will have to endure before closing in. [Haughty] + [Tracking Roll]
>>
>>4127073
> If your trackers can remove the lookouts on the main approach your whole force could ride up the path near unopposed. Even if they fail, the advantage of the charge is well worth the volley or two you will have to endure before closing in. [Haughty] + [Tracking Roll]
>>
>>4127073
Since we're still in Fallavon, does Emile still have his pathfinder terrain bonus? Or is that the deepwoods only?
>>
>>4127073
>>If you sacrifice your mounted advantage, you could use your pathfinding skills to circle around and find a way to lead your force into the encampment on foot. Already running amok in their ranks, the element of surprise would be amplified. [Idealist] + [Pathfinder Roll]
>>
>>4127073

>If you sacrifice your mounted advantage, you could use your pathfinding skills to circle around and find a way to lead your force into the encampment on foot. Already running amok in their ranks, the element of surprise would be amplified. [Idealist] + [Pathfinder Roll i
s pathfinding the only one we have a reroll with from our gear?

>>4125730
This is me.
>>
>>4127073
Charlie will be Mikail's mount, right?
>>
>>4127073
Jess should use the basilisk eye's petrifying gaze effect on those lookouts btw. It's the perfect situation for it.
>>
>>4127637
I think the petrifying gaze of the basilisk eye is only for combat (grants +3 combat re-rolls) so it doesn't apply for this tracking roll. However, we still have Courageous Sky and Jessica's rouncey. (I wonder if she named it already.)
>>
>>4127742
I think that we would only get that if we fight with her next to us, as we can only have i think 3 companions to give ous bonuses to combat and the rest do there own thing.
>>
>>4127073
>If you sacrifice your mounted advantage, you could use your pathfinding skills to circle around and find a way to lead your force into the encampment on foot. Already running amok in their ranks, the element of surprise would be amplified. [Idealist] + [Pathfinder Roll]

We are here to surprise them, so we should take full advantage of that. Plus, we're pretty damn decent at Pathfinding, so hopefully we won't botch the roll.
>>
> If your trackers can remove the lookouts on the main approach your whole force could ride up the path near unopposed. Even if they fail, the advantage of the charge is well worth the volley or two you will have to endure before closing in. [Haughty] + [Tracking Roll]

With a sharp nod at your masked Fae companion she sinks into the foliage like a crocodile slipping into the water, wicked dirk in hand. She has a natural aptitude for stealth and the soft-step required of this skulduggery, and by some small chance of fate her dull purple-red motley is choice camouflage in this twilight hour with the setting sun. You consider putting bells on that headgear of hers in more social environs, just so you can keep track of where the girl is without always looking over your shoulder.

-------------------------------------------------------------------

Tracking Roll / Companion: Jess the Kid

>Intimate Terrain Knowledge (Companion) / Unaware Quarry 70DC
>Dusk +10DC
>Courageous Sky +0 Re-Roll (spent)
>80 DC


Double Fail = Companion AV Save: Jess the Kid
0 = By the time your cohort forces its way up the path into the camp itself you have squandered the advantage of surprise. Endure 3 volleys.
1 = The alarm is sounded, and the lookouts and first responders harass your approach into the camp. Endure 2 volleys.
2 = The messy death of the last lookouts sends the camp into a panic, but resistance to your force’s approach is rushed and ineffective. Endure 1 volley.
3 = The lookouts never stood a chance. The first inkling the bandits have of your approach is the thunder of hooves as you crash into their encampment. No volleys. Get a free volley from Jess
Double Success = Jess the Kid has time to reach a good firing position.



3 rolls of 1d100. You have 0 Re-Rolls.

Fae Operators Operatin’.
>>
Rolled 65 (1d100)

>>4128798
>>
Rolled 31 (1d100)

>>4128798
>>
Rolled 29 (1d100)

>>4128798
>>
Never saw her coming. Let's see if her free shot rings true as well.

------------------------------------

Ranged Roll: Jess
>Jess Ranged Skill Base 50 DC
>Long Range -10DC to Hit, -10AV to Foe
>Comrade Status: The first double fail is considered a hit instead of friendly fire.
>40DC

1 roll of 1d100.
>>
>>4128800
>>4128801
>>4128802
Nice rolls anons. We now have the advantages of initiative, element of surprise, far better equipment, far better training, far better morale, and far better discipline. The advantages they have are numerical superiority (which was lessened by the pilgrims joining us) and defensive position. Battle progress I think will be Certain Victory or at least Overwhelming Force.
>>
New roller, for fairness sake.
>>
Rolled 5 (1d100)

>>4128808
>>
Rolled 18 (1d100)

>>4128808
>>
>>4128808
*should say 'is considered a miss'. Higher loyalty improves this trait for ranged companions.
>>
>>4128811
Noice! Jess with them Robin Hood skills.
>>
>>4128811
>>4128812
Good going Based faefu.
>>
>>4128813
I wonder what Loyalty and Sister-For-Life statuses would improve upon it.
>>
>>4128820
Loyalty means all double fails are misses instead (they won't risk a shot that will harm you).

Tbh I haven't come up for an appropriate top-tier ranged status bonus. I would think that should be more unique to the individual in question.
>>
File: Fae Ranger 2.jpg (59 KB, 400x543)
59 KB
59 KB JPG
Rolled 83 (1d100)

Rolling AV for a random one of the initial bandits you will face.

>Armour Value = 15AV [Leather Armour +10AV, Round Wooden Shield +15AV, Longbow Optimal Range -10DC]
>>
>>4128823
>I would think that should be more unique to the individual in question.

Uniqueness would be great and make sense for a Brother/Sister-For-Life status.

Can Damien lend his second sword to Mikail for this skirmish?
>>
how well fed are they forgotten do they have enough wealth to be healthy
>>
>>4128826
I honestly don't think it's appropriate unless there was a dire need. If Mikail was actually unarmed yes, but I don't see a knight lending his blade out just to replace a slightly inferior weapon. Besides, the whole thing strikes me as gamey. Like asking to borrow your brother's Fae-rune sword before the duel.

So I will not present that as an option now and in the future unless there is an obvious and pressing reason.

>>4128829
They are better-off than Craig of Lowgrove's sorry lot, so yes they will be baseline healthy.
>>
I thought ranger companions wouldn't be really that useful. It seems that I underestimated their usefulness inside combat and outside of it.
>>
Just want to say Forgotten this session is way comfier now that most of the shitposters have been told to cut it out. Makes the experience of participating enjoyable again rather than scrolling through post after post of autism.
>>
File: Stealth takedown.gif (3.78 MB, 421x237)
3.78 MB
3.78 MB GIF
>3 Success
>The lookouts never stood a chance. The first inkling the bandits have of your approach is the thunder of hooves as you crash into their encampment. No volleys. Get a free volley from Jess

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oWQhezXbi7A – Forest assault theme

You have your eye on two of the four lookouts on the trail ahead, but you only ever actually see the Fae wildling remove one of them. A hand darts out from a fern as one passes by, dragging back into the foliage by his cloak to meet a presumably sharp end.

For the longest time after that, nothing happens. Not until Jess the Kid emerges from the undergrowth, bold as you, like less than two metres from the last lookout with her back to him. She waves at you. You’re about to shout a warning, how could she miss him? But then you notice that the lookout isn’t moving, and is slumped against the tree rather than sitting. He’s dead, you realise, you had your eyes on him the whole time and never saw it.

“This is it. Move out.” Cain on the Cross, she’s good. “For King and Cantôn.”

[1/3]
>>
File: Final rites.gif (924 KB, 269x175)
924 KB
924 KB GIF
Throughout your small strike force the men, mounted or dismounted, perform their final checks and last petty rituals, the kind individual to every soul when the hour of violence is nigh. Every man has one last habit to still the nerves of battle. One final tug of a helmet strap, a nervous rub of some charm to bring good fortune or one last utterance of a prayer or phrase.

You’ve begun to notice your companions’ little quirks, those that you have fought side-by-side with before enough to recognise. Sir dan Marc tilts his blade across his shoulder, his cheek brushing the razor edge. You wonder if that reminder of the sword’s keen sharpness comforts him. Mikail chews his thumbnail, the right thumb always, before adjusting his flattop helm one last time. He mutters something under his breath, but you can’t rid his lips. Your brother tugs his coif and looks skyward, grounding himself with two deep, steadying breaths. He closes his eyes and smiles, making peace with the life he’s led to this point you imagine.

You wonder what yours is, your secret little tic before the chaos of battle descends. You catch yourself rubbing the bear totem that hangs around your neck with a wry grin. You look behind you, half-a-dozen mounted warriors await your signal along with that number again in fervently zealous pilgrims.

[2/3]
>>
[3/3]

The horses stir into motion. The mounts of the knights, warhorses bred for moments like this, snort and shake with agitation. They can sense violence is at hand, the battle they were made for is but scant moments away. The clop of trotting hooves is deafening to your ears, the whole forest appears to have gone silent but for that sound. You are relieved that your column did not have to navigate this narrow pathway under fire, and more relieved still when you crest the lip of the hill to see the bandit camp utterly oblivious.

You raise your gauntlet, calling a halt even as Hannibal strains at the lead. “Wait for the signal.”

“What signal?” The Green Knight mutters next to you, an outlying bandit looking up in confusion as a nicker spills from one of the overeager horses. An arrow shaft appears in his side and the bandit drops to the ground clutching at it with a shrill scream. “Oh. That’ll work.”

You gauntlet swings down and the silence of the forest erupts into the thunder of hooves.

======================================================


(1) Charge Stance
>Belligerent Charge. Exchange of Blows does not inflict damage; +1 Damage to Foe if any unsaved damaged is inflicted. +1 Dismount Severity, Reduce 1 Foe to Battered, Destrier attack DC 50.

>Audacious Charge. Halve AV (Rounding up); Each point of unsaved damage to Foe is doubled. +2 Dismount Severity, Reduce 1d3 Foes to Battered, Destrier attack DC 66.
(2) Select 2 companions. These are the individuals who are watching your back, and vice versa. Anyone not selected may be a potential casualty on the battle progress results. All reclaimants are on foot and may not participate in the first round of battle.
> Young Lord Damien Andrei, The Green Knight – Brother-for-Life
> Brother Rousseau, Knights Comitas - Comrade
> Brother Gaspard, Knights Comitas - Untested
> Brother Cancicail, Knights Comitas - Untested
> Sir Neil dan Marc, Sworn Man - Comrade
> Mikail of Andryski, Squire – Loyal
> Father Towbray, Reclaimant Priest - Comrade
> Brother Abelard the Elder, Reclaimant Zealot - Untested
> Brother Abelard the Younger, Reclaimant Zealot - Untested
> Brother Riche of St. Gabriel’s Gate, Reclaimaint Zealot - Untested
> Brother Hans of St. Gabriel’s Gate - Untested
> Brother Jon of Aubrey, Reclaimant Zealot - Untested
> Brother Capal of Orleyville, Reclaimant Zealot - Untested
>>
>>4128851
> Young Lord Damien Andrei, The Green Knight – Brother-for-Life
> Mikail of Andryski, Squire – Loyal

DEUS VULT!
>>
>>4128851
>Belligerent Charge. Exchange of Blows does not inflict damage; +1 Damage to Foe if any unsaved damaged is inflicted. +1 Dismount Severity, Reduce 1 Foe to Battered, Destrier attack DC 50.

> Sir Neil dan Marc, Sworn Man - Comrade
> Mikail of Andryski, Squire – Loyal
>>
I can only provide one round of updates tomorrow, due to IRL obligations. I will try to crack out a few more the day after that but can't promise to have the battle concluded by then. Despite the numerous advantages you have secured yourselves.

>>4128838
That is good to hear, the penalties will stay in place for this thread but I hope this is a sign of more good-matured threads to come.
>>
>>4128851
1)
>Audacious Charge. Halve AV (Rounding up); Each point of unsaved damage to Foe is doubled. +2 Dismount Severity, Reduce 1d3 Foes to Battered, Destrier attack DC 66.

2)
> Young Lord Damien Andrei, The Green Knight – Brother-for-Life

> Mikail of Andryski, Squire – Loyal
>>
>>4128851
(1) Charge Stance
>Belligerent Charge. Exchange of Blows does not inflict damage; +1 Damage to Foe if any unsaved damaged is inflicted. +1 Dismount Severity, Reduce 1 Foe to Battered, Destrier attack DC 50.

(2) Select 2 companions.
>Young Lord Damien Andrei, The Green Knight – Brother-for-Life
>Mikail of Andryski, Squire – Loyal

O Almighty God, shield and watch over your faithul son Sir Emile Varga Andrei with your divine guardianship.
>>
>Audacious Charge. Halve AV (Rounding up); Each point of unsaved damage to Foe is doubled. +2 Dismount Severity, Reduce 1d3 Foes to Battered, Destrier attack DC 66.
> Sir Neil dan Marc, Sworn Man - Comrade
> Mikail of Andryski, Squire – Loyal
so tempted too put down father towbray
>>
>>4128851
(1) Charge Stance
>Audacious Charge

(2) Select 2 companions.
>Young Lord Damien Andrei, The Green Knight – Brother-for-Life
> Sir Neil dan Marc, Sworn Man - Comrade
>>
>>4128847
1
>Beligerent Charge

2
>Young Lord Damien Andrei
>Brother Rousseau
>>
>>4127357
Claiming this ID
>>
>>4128851
(1)
>Audacious Charge. Halve AV (Rounding up); Each point of unsaved damage to Foe is doubled. +2 Dismount Severity, Reduce 1d3 Foes to Battered, Destrier attack DC 66.
(2)
> Sir Neil dan Marc, Sworn Man - Comrade
> Mikail of Andryski, Squire – Loyal
Let's switch it up a bit.
>>
>>4128851
(1) Charge Stance
>Belligerent Charge. Exchange of Blows does not inflict damage; +1 Damage to Foe if any unsaved damaged is inflicted. +1 Dismount Severity, Reduce 1 Foe to Battered, Destrier attack DC 50.

(2) Select 2 companions
>Young Lord Damien Andrei, The Green Knight – Brother-for-Life
>Mikail of Andryski, Squire – Loyal
>>
>>4128851
(1)
>Audacious Charge. Halve AV (Rounding up); Each point of unsaved damage to Foe is doubled. +2 Dismount Severity, Reduce 1d3 Foes to Battered, Destrier attack DC 66

(2)
>Sir Neil dan Marc, Sworn Man - Comrade
>Mikail of Andryski, Squire - Loyal
>>
>>4128851
>1)
>>Audacious Charge. Halve AV (Rounding up); Each point of unsaved damage to Foe is doubled. +2 Dismount Severity, Reduce 1d3 Foes to Battered, Destrier attack DC 66.
>2)
>> Young Lord Damien Andrei, The Green Knight – Brother-for-Life
>> Mikail of Andryski, Squire – Loyal
>>4128838
Me
>>
>>4128851
>>Audacious Charge. Halve AV (Rounding up); Each point of unsaved damage to Foe is doubled. +2 Dismount Severity, Reduce 1d3 Foes to Battered, Destrier attack DC 66.
> Mikail of Andryski, Squire – Loyal
> Young Lord Damien Andrei, The Green Knight – Brother-for-Life
>>
>>4128851
1
>Belligerent Charge

2
>Damien Andrei the Green Knight
>Mikail of Andryski

Tally ho!
>>
>>4128851

(1) Charge Stance
> Audacious Charge

(2) Companions
> Young Lord Damien Andrei
> Mikail of Andryski

Two things Forgotten: we sent dan Marc off to guard the pilgrims and you want us to roll for the bear totem now or later?
>>
>>4128851
(1) Charge Stance
>Belligerent Charge. Exchange of Blows does not inflict damage; +1 Damage to Foe if any unsaved damaged is inflicted. +1 Dismount Severity, Reduce 1 Foe to Battered, Destrier attack DC 50.

(2) Select 2 companions.
>Young Lord Damien Andrei, The Green Knight – Brother-for-Life
>Mikail of Andryski, Squire – Loyal

>>4104327
>>4112787
>>4121700
>>4127329
These are all me.
>>
>>4128907
>The pilgrims should make for Darbyshire as we prepare, they will be safe behind the town walls if this should go awry.” This bandit scout will go with them for now. Your sworn man had voiced his concern, and so you select him for the task of protecting the pilgrims. “Sir dan Marc, I will charge you with this duty.”
>“With Reginae’s grace sirs, we will find our own way. I suspect that you will need every able swordhand when the moment is at hand.” Sister Superior Ignatius makes the cupped sign of Salve Reginae, already the convoy is stirring back into hurried movement. “We will pray for your safety, and make what preparations we can for any wounded.”
>>
>>4128907
You made the offer to have Sir dan Marc escort the pilgrims but Sister Ignatius insisted they would be fine. There is negligible risk of them coming to harm in any case.


I’ll hold off on the bear totem roll for now.
>>
>>4128851
(1)
>Audacious Charge. Halve AV (Rounding up); Each point of unsaved damage to Foe is doubled. +2 Dismount Severity, Reduce 1d3 Foes to Battered, Destrier attack DC 66.

(2)
>Young Lord Damien Andrei, The Green Knight – Brother-for-Life
>Mikail of Andryski, Squire – Loyal
>>
>>4128851
>Audacious Charge. Halve AV (Rounding up); Each point of unsaved damage to Foe is doubled. +2 Dismount Severity, Reduce 1d3 Foes to Battered, Destrier attack DC 66.

> Young Lord Damien Andrei, The Green Knight – Brother-for-Life
> Mikail of Andryski, Squire – Loyal

Time to roll some nat 100

>>4127608
This is me.
>>
>>4128851
>Belligerent Charge. Exchange of Blows does not inflict damage; +1 Damage to Foe if any unsaved damaged is inflicted. +1 Dismount Severity, Reduce 1 Foe to Battered, Destrier attack DC 50.

> Young Lord Damien Andrei, The Green Knight – Brother-for-Life

> Mikail of Andryski, Squire – Loyal

Can we assign NdM to take a hit for Towbray? What with him being faithful, and a priest respectively?
>>
>>4128851
>Belligerent Charge. Exchange of Blows does not inflict damage; +1 Damage to Foe if any unsaved damaged is inflicted. +1 Dismount Severity, Reduce 1 Foe to Battered, Destrier attack DC 50.
> Young Lord Damien Andrei, The Green Knight – Brother-for-Life
> Mikail of Andryski, Squire – Loyal
DEUS VULT
>>
>>4128851
>Belligerent Charge. Exchange of Blows does not inflict damage; +1 Damage to Foe if any unsaved damaged is inflicted. +1 Dismount Severity, Reduce 1 Foe to Battered, Destrier attack DC 50.

> Father Towbray, Reclaimant Priest - Comrade

> Brother Rousseau, Knights Comitas - Comrade

Allahu Akhbar!

But seriously, since this is kind of a milk run of a fight, why not try fighting with someone else for a change?
>>
>>4128913
>>4128922

Missed that line; sorry ‘bout that.

>>4129021

I’d like to roll with Father Towbray too, but considering just how much shit we went through to earn that Brother-for-Life status, especially since our time with our brother is limited, I’d rather not squander the ability to cheat death 3x a day.

As for taking Mikail, he’s our squire for one and I want to keep him a bit more insulated from the rest of the raging battle.
>>
>>4128851
>Audacious Charge. Halve AV (Rounding up); Each point of unsaved damage to Foe is doubled. +2 Dismount Severity, Reduce 1d3 Foes to Battered, Destrier attack DC 66.

> Mikail of Andryski, Squire – Loyal
> Sir Neil dan Marc, Sworn Man - Comrade
>>
>>4128851
>(1) Charge Stance
>>Audacious Charge. Halve AV (Rounding up); Each point of unsaved damage to Foe is doubled. +2 Dismount Severity, Reduce 1d3 Foes to Battered, Destrier attack DC 66.

>(2) Select 2 companions. These are the individuals who are watching your back, and vice versa. Anyone not selected may be a potential casualty on the battle progress results. All reclaimants are on foot and may not participate in the first round of battle.
>> Young Lord Damien Andrei, The Green Knight – Brother-for-Life
>> Brother Rousseau, Knights Comitas - Comrade

This charge is key for the surprise it will gain and we have our rerolls to use.
>>
>>4128851
Forgotten, is our hired blade participating?
>>
>>4129197
Yeah. What happened to Orin?
>>
>>4129197
>>4129217

If I recall, we voted to not spend money outfitting him with the minimum required equipment for hirelings to be effective.
>>
>>4129197
>>4129217
I assumed you wanted him to remain with your pack horse, baggage etc given his unsuitability for combat. Currently he is as poorly equipped at the pilgrims and without their zealotry.

But I probably should have put that to a vote.
>>
>>4129394
It's alright, hopefully we can loot some gear for him later
>>
>>4129394
Nah, no problem Forgotten. Thanks for the answer,
>>
>>4129394
>>4129394
Don´t we have a lucky Charm? Should I roll for it?
>>
>>4129419
>>4128851
Alos, my vote:

>Audacious Charge

>Mikhail
>The Green Knight
>>
>>4128851
>Audacious Charge

>Damien Andrei, Green Knight
>Sir Neil dan Marc
>>
>>4129419
FYI I am not counting new ID votes or rolls unless you link back to a previous vote.

Sorry I know it’s a hassle, but I do think the foot needs to be put down to encourage better behaviour in future threads.
>>
>>4129394
I was thinking that we could have him scavage equipment for his to use from the dead. And as a hired blade, he'll have no scruples about looting the dead. Unlike us, who can't exactly loot it and bring it back for him.
>>
>>4128851
>1) Charge Stance
>>Audacious Charge. Halve AV (Rounding up); Each point of unsaved damage to Foe is doubled. +2 Dismount

Severity, Reduce 1d3 Foes to Battered, Destrier attack DC 66.
>(2) Select 2 companions. These are the individuals who are watching your back, and vice versa. Anyone not selected may be a potential casualty on the battle progress results. All reclaimants are on foot and may not participate in the first round of battle.
>> Young Lord Damien Andrei, The Green Knight – Brother-for-Life
>> Mikail of Andryski, Squire – Loyal

With how they might be in danger if they're not our companions, better keep them close.
>>
>>4129815
With our thorns points, our people will loot if there is time for it after a battle.
>>
>>4129824
Correct but thats only for the purpose of gaining 1 wealth.

Recall the last time that even looting what was essential for survival in the forest was not chosen and than looting the corpse fully would have earned even more. So likely we're only going to get 1 wealth looted.
>>
>>4129828
Unless we vote to loot even more.
Ir we can use the loot to give to the sisters or something?
>>
>>4129839
Or kit out Mikail finally if there is stuff appropriate for him
>>
>>4129839
We could but I think we could use the wealth more. After debts, we're running at or close to zero. Anything we get from this will help our situation so we're not destitute.
>>
>>4129846
Our debt costs 2w i think and we dont have to pay it back till end of year i think, got planty of time.
>>
>>4129875
Probably best to have it all squared away before we get on the boat though. I'd like to be able to send someone (Damien probably) with the money to pay it off for us on his way home
>>
>>4130048
Lots of time to make money before then.

>>4125977
>>4129672
Feel free to expand on House Vidra when possible ;)
>>
>>4130115
Not if we take up the post of dragonguard
>>
>>4130115
I don't think we'll be on the road all that long before we reach the port. Fairly certain it is literally our next destination
>>
>>4130119
> Not making money

> Becoming a Dragonguard

One of us is misunderstanding what you wrote.

>>4130123
Pretty sure we can make money in Pascae. People wager in duels, yeah?
>>
>>4130176
>Pretty sure we can make money in Pascae. People wager in duels, yeah?

That's... actually a pretty good point
>>
>>4130176
I was assuming you meant timewise. As in theres quite abit of time before the debt is due? But if we take up the posting, we'll not be able to easily return back in time before we have to repay it as its a long affair.
>>
>>4130184
Pretty sure as a Noble we have the right to send a letter of credit from one merchant to another.

http://library.law.columbia.edu/CircularLetterOfCredit/

Since Carthagi has a currently good relationship with Canton there should be no problems with that. It's not like we personally have to carry the wealth there.

Or we could send NdM back with it or something.

Especially if House Vidra has a trade route that connects Cathag.
>>
>>4130211
Considering Damien is heading home and it isn't all that far from our own lands he can probably take the money on his way
>>
>>4130184
>>4130211
Heck if we become a Dragon Guard, we could even just ask for him to have an agent send the 2 wealth signing bonus to our creditor for us, as a condition of joining since we have a prior obligation otherwise and we want to clear that up first.
>>
>>4130211
I was thinking of more asking our brother to bring back the funds for it back with him. Since then we'll avoid the cost of actually hiring someone to bring it there, plus hes obviously trustworthy. It'll be a larger hit upfront but the more economical option. Put together with the fees for our travels on our pilgrimage and we'll be abit tapped out.
>>
>>4130217
True. But it's not like that's our only option.

We could even invest the wealth from our signing bonus in a merchant ship from Cathagoragiag to Romaine and have the profit used to pay off our creditor or send any additional wealth home to help the family out.

Big Dick Energy, sending money home. Very filial piety move. 1 wealth = more men to kill Deadmen and protect the lands.
>>
File: Bear Totem.jpg (544 KB, 800x601)
544 KB
544 KB JPG
Can I get a roll to see if the Bear Totem activates.

> 50DC

1 roll of 1d100.
>>
Rolled 4 (1d100)

>>4130599
>>
>>4130600
nice roll
>>
>>4130600
Nice
>>
>>4130600
Nicely done. I will call for rolls soon
>>
Please remember, new ID rolls without a link to a previous ID WILL NOT BE COUNTED
>>
Rolled 1 (1d3)

>Audacious Charge. Halve AV (Rounding up); Each point of unsaved damage to Foe is doubled. +2 Dismount Severity, Reduce 1d3 Foes to Battered, Destrier attack DC 66.
> Young Lord Damien Andrei, The Green Knight – Brother-for-Life
> Mikail of Andryski, Squire – Loyal

Rolling to see how many enemies are reduced to battered. And I'll assume Jess's shot is tacked on to one of those as well.
>>
Rolled 94 (1d100)

>>4130613


>>4125498
Me
>>
>>4130614
well I'm glad I fucked up that post
>>
>>4130613
Pretty pathetic charge
>>
>>4121420
Getting this out of the way. This is me.
>>
File: Hired Thug.png (167 KB, 361x707)
167 KB
167 KB PNG
> Battle Progress: OVERWHELMING FORCE (70DC).

The enemy has a sharp advantage in numbers, a score-and-a-half combatants to your dozen or so. However the sudden shock of your completely unexpected attack, the difference in morale and the factor that half of your force is made up of elite quality mounted units compared to none on their side means that this advantage is useless in the chaos. The enemy has scant chance at repelling you unless they manage to rally themselves and bring their numbers to bear.
>>
File: Ride them down!.gif (1.53 MB, 220x319)
1.53 MB
1.53 MB GIF
Fenegan, 21st Day of Novrimun, 883 A.C.E. – Far West Fallavon Woodlands
Assault on the West Wood Bandit Camp

>Audacious Charge. Halve AV (Rounding up); Each point of unsaved damage to Foe is doubled. +2 Dismount Severity, Reduce 1d3 Foes to Battered, Destrier attack DC 66
> Battle Progress: OVERWHELMING FORCE (70DC).
> Surprise Attack! Your side has successful launched a surprise assault and may re-roll all battle progress rolls on the first round.
> Skirmish (dozens of combatants): Winning Personal Combat will add +20DC to Battle Progress and +1 Battle Re-Roll
> Mounted & Holds Initiative: You will have free reign to make tactical choices at the conclusion or even during the melee.


Sir Emile Andrei, Young Knight of Romaine: Healthy
Young Lord Damien Andrei, The Green Knight: Healthy
Mikail of Andryski, Squire to Sir Andrei: Healthy
Jess the Kid, Longbowman: Healthy
>Combat = +90DC [Healthy +5DC, Strong +5DC, Castle-forged Arming Sword +5DC, Breastplate and Helm +10DC, Blademaster +10DC, Sore Shoulder -1DC, Mikail +7DC, Young Lord Andrei +15DC, Law of Adam +4DC, Mounted +10DC, Charge +15DC, Might of Ursen +5DC]
>Armour Value = 27AV [Breastplate and Helm +20AV, Heater Shield +20AV, Guardian +6AV, Basilisk Scale Shirt +7AV] /2 Audacious
>Combat Re-Rolls = 5 [Holy Orders +1, Courageous Sky +1, Blessed Artefact +1, Bear Totem +1, Young Lord Andrei (BFL) +1]
>Armour Value Re-Rolls = 1 [Shield of Faith +1 Re-Roll]

VS

‘Snaps’ Wesley, Bandit Swordsman: Healthy
Dolf Brittle, Bandit Axeman: Injured
Erskin of Darbyshire, Bandit Swordsman: Healthy
Erskin of Elsewhere, Bandit Axeman: Healthy
Dild the Bastard, Bandit Swordsman: Healthy
Rowan ‘Righteous’, Bandit Swordsman: Healthy
Fleek the Padfoot, Knife-thrower: Healthy
Quelf Ruddy, Bowman: Healthy
>Combat = +55DC [Healthy +5DC, Steel Blade +0, Battle Brother x5 +50DC]
> Armour Value = Armour Value = 20AV [Leather Armour +10AV, Round Wooden Shield +15AV, Avenger -5DC]

____

(1) Personal Combat
> 75 DC
> You have 5 re-rolls
> 3 rolls of 1d100.

(2) Destrier Attack
> 66 DC
> 1 roll of 1d100.

(3) Friendly Ranged Combat
>Jess the Kid: Longbow – Long Range 40 DC
>Jess will focus on Ranged Opponents first. (no risk of friendly fire unless ordered otherwise)
>1 Roll of 1d100

(4) Battle Progress: Overwhelming Force
> 70 DC
>Surprise Attack, You may re-roll any fails this first round.
> 3 rolls of 1d100.

(5) Foe Ranged Combat
> Fleek the Padfoot: Throwing Knives – Short Range 40 DC
> Quelf Ruddy: Shortbow – Short Range 50 DC
>These opponents are scrambling to reach their equipment and will not fire this round.
>QM rolls 2d100.

8 rolls of 1d100, kniggas.

Ride them down!
>>
Rolled 54 (1d100)

>>4130626
>>
Rolled 19 (1d100)

>>4130626
>>
Rolled 22 (1d100)

>>4130626
DEUS VULT
>>
Correction, Battle Progress is actually 80DC because of Righteous Zeal (that was probably too high a buff, but still).

I regret to inform you guys that I don't have time to give a proper content update after these rolls
>>
>>4130626
>> You have 5 re-rolls

Holy shit that is a lot of fucking re-rolls lads
>>
Rolled 46 (1d100)

>>4130626
>>
Rolled 93 (1d100)

>>4130626
DEUS VULT
>>
>>4130629
Nice double knniga!
>>
>>4130630
All good mate, appreciate the chance to roll anyway
>>
File: 158365762119.png (132 KB, 264x265)
132 KB
132 KB PNG
>Overwhelming force
Oh boy you guys are fucked hope you roll good on battle progress if not you are getting ass raped tonight
>>
Rolled 21 (1d100)

>>4130626
>>
Rolled 75 (1d100)

>>4130626
AMEN
>>
Rolled 18 (1d100)

>>4130626
>>
>>4130637
Meh, we got 3 passes for personal combat, next battle progress will have +20DC plus a re-roll, welcome to easy street please no one roll a crit failure for battle progress
>>
>>4130627
>>4130628
>>4130629
>>4130632
>>4130633
>>4130638
>>4130639
>>4130640
Nice rolling anons! The surprise charge has been a complete and forunate success!
>>
>we roll a double critfail next round
Calling it here!
>>
>>4130627
>>4130628
>>4130629
>3 passes for personal combat
>A double?

>>4130632
Pass for HANNIBAL

>>4130633
Failure for Jess

>>4130640
>>4130638
>>4130639
>2 successes for Battle progress

Not bad for round 1
>>
>>4130630
to be fair forgotten we aced the interogation and jesses tracking and chose the right option for the pre battle speech we kinda got every advantage possible
>>
>>4130641
We should focus on the personal combat and be on guard. We're up against 8 opponents with 2 of them ranged opponents.
>>
>>4130648
battle dc is actually 80 even forgotten nerfs the bonus to 5 it's still a pass
>>
>>4130651
if all these points of damage go through thats 9/10 damage don't know if hannible doubles but that's 3 dead if you include the injured guy
>>
>>4130648
Actually battle progress is a complete success. DC is 80.

>>4130650
Yeah, we prepared and planned very damn well and brought forth ever advantage we had.
>>
>>4130653
>>4130656
Yeah I missed that so barring Jess we've aced most of our combat rolls this round.
>>
Excellent rolling anons. Let's pray we can keep it up in the upcoming rounds.
>>
Rolled 63, 53, 22, 17 = 155 (4d100)

Rolling 4 AV Saves for the bandits. (Mighty Blow + Hannibal)

> Armour Value = 20AV [Leather Armour +10AV, Round Wooden Shield +15AV, Avenger -5DC]

All damage is doubled this round, and the double inflicts +1 damage regardless of these AV saves. Bandits look like they are in for a world of hurt.
>>
>>4130663
You picked the wrong forest, fools
>>
File: Knight Gallop.gif (297 KB, 954x590)
297 KB
297 KB GIF
>>4130663
>3 Damage
>+1 Damage (double success)
>x2 all unsaved damage (Audacious)

That's a whopping 8 damage on the charge, and +2 to Battle Progress [7] well done!

I will open the votes for next rounds combat stance now, that way tomorrow we can head straight into the rolls when I am able to provide the content update.

============================

Combat Stance

>Cautious - Double AV (Max 80), Total unsaved damage to Foe is halved (Rounding up)

>Guarded - Exchange of Blows does not inflict or sustain damage.

>Balanced - AV and Damage remain unchanged. May Re-Roll results of this and next Combat Stance superiority roll.

>Belligerent - Exchange of Blows does not inflict damage; +1 Damage to Foe if any unsaved damaged is inflicted.

>Audacious - Halve AV (Rounding up); Each point of unsaved damage to Foe is doubled.
>>
>>4130667
>>Audacious - Halve AV (Rounding up); Each point of unsaved damage to Foe is doubled.
>>
>>4130667
>>Audacious - Halve AV (Rounding up); Each point of unsaved damage to Foe is doubled.

Lets capitalize on the damage we've done and keep the momentum going. Lambs to the slaughter
>>
>>4130667
>Audacious - Halve AV (Rounding up); Each point of unsaved damage to Foe is doubled.
Finally a situation that warrants Audacious
>>
>>4130667
>Balanced - AV and Damage remain unchanged. May Re-Roll results of this and next Combat Stance superiority roll.

>Belligerent - Exchange of Blows does not inflict damage; +1 Damage to Foe if any unsaved damaged is inflicted.

Forgotten can you set a time date for when we will continue? Thanks in advance.
>>
>>4130667
>>Audacious - Halve AV (Rounding up); Each point of unsaved damage to Foe is doubled.
>>
Did you roll for their ranged members' shots Forgotten?
>>
>>4130671
I will try to commit to no later than 20:00AEST (so 22 hours from now), but I will give at least a 1 hour prior heads up.
>>
>>4130667
>Belligerent - Exchange of Blows does not inflict damage; +1 Damage to Foe if any unsaved damaged is inflicted.

Anons picking audacious a second consecutive time is incredibly dangerous because of the rounding up effect of AV. Our AV will be ultra low next turn and we won't have the charge bonus.
>>
>>4130667
>>Audacious - Halve AV (Rounding up); Each point of unsaved damage to Foe is doubled.
>>
>>4130679
I don't think that's how that works. I am fairly certain its current AV score halved and then any weird fractions etc rounded up. So for example am AV of 23 halved is 11.5 but rounded up it would be a total of 12.

>>4130678
Could you clarify this?
>>
>>4130667
>>Audacious - Halve AV (Rounding up); Each point of unsaved damage to Foe is doubled.
>>
>>4130682
Roll will commence again for the second battle round in 22 hours. But if I cannot make that deadline I will let you know.
>>
>>4130685
Sorry I wasn't clear what I meant, I was just linking to get your attention on another matter. Was I correct in how the Halving AV thing works in my previous post? I think I might have misunderstood the other anon but it seems like he was suggesting that our currently halved AV is again halved if we pick that option
>>
>>4130667
>Audacious - Halve AV (Rounding up); Each point of unsaved damage to Foe is doubled.

>Our DC for next round: 90 - 15 = 75
>Enemy DC for next round: 55 - 2x5 (2 dead bandits) = 45

Effective DC: 75 - 45 + 50 = 80

I think we have a good chance. Might as well use our rerolls. Finish this quickly before the archers come fully into play and before the enemy scouts return to catch us between a rock and a hard place.
>>
>>4130667
>Belligerent - Exchange of Blows does not inflict damage; +1 Damage to Foe if any unsaved damaged is inflicted.
>>
File: Spoiler Image (34 KB, 316x296)
34 KB
34 KB JPG
>>4130666
10000 years of photoshop why the fuck can't I draw halfway decent in the chad meme?
>>
>>4130687
The effects of a combat stance are for that round only. So your AV is only halved once with audacious, not for each audacious stance you have selected prior to that.

I should probably also point out that the +2 Dismount Severity risk and boost to Hannibal's attacks do not continue past the initial charge round either.
>>
>>4130699
Cool appreciate the clarification
>>
>>4130667
>Belligerent - Exchange of Blows does not inflict damage; +1 Damage to Foe if any unsaved damaged is inflicted.
>>
>>4130696
Kek
>>
>>4128885
>>4127357
These are me.
>>
>>4130692
The close combat bandits actually contribute +10DC each, so you're looking at a whopping 90DC for personal combat.

Even one more dead bandit will see you win personal combat and, with the boost to Battle Progress from that in Skirmish, the battle is all but rolls.

Assuming you don't have a few unlucky rolls next round, you could very well take out a numerically superior force without any of your fellows becoming casualties.
>>
>>4130667
>Audacious - Halve AV (Rounding up); Each point of unsaved damage to Foe is doubled

This is me>>4128894
>>
>>4130705
*all but yours
>>
(4) Battle Progress: Overwhelming Force
> 70 DC
>Surprise Attack, You may re-roll any fails this first round.
> 3 rolls of 1d100.
Shouldn't we be able to re-roll >>4130639?
>>
>>4130667
>Audacious - Halve AV (Rounding up); Each point of unsaved damage to Foe is doubled
>>
>>4130699
nah forgotten -15 from charging makes it 60 dc then +20 from the 2 kills makes it 80
>>
>>4130709
no need the Dc was actually 80 >>4130630
>>
>>4130714
also depends how you implement staggering blow
>>
>>4130705
> Assuming you don't have a few unlucky rolls next round, you could very well take out a numerically superior force without any of your fellows becoming casualties.

Mah gawd, forgotten, you’ve doomed us.
>>
>>4130714
Oh right
>>
>>4130667
>Audacious
>Belligerent

>>4130718
Staggering Blows applies for every foe Emile delivers unsaved damage to.
>>
File: Dangers of Genius.png (236 KB, 500x561)
236 KB
236 KB PNG
>>4130723
>>4130714
Actually, I may have miscalculated. The last round should have been Personal Combat 85, not 75. So next combat will actually be 90DC after all.

I know you guys worked hard to bring every advantage possible to play against these ruffians, but I am starting to feel pretty bad for these outmatched outlaws...
>>
File: Laughing Knight.jpg (70 KB, 799x533)
70 KB
70 KB JPG
>>4130728
>Feeling bad for unsavory criminals who don't even talk to angels or do Adams work
>>
>>4130728
They choose the wrong woods
>>
>>4130667
>>4130679
>>4130699
>Audacious - Halve AV (Rounding up); Each point of unsaved damage to Foe is doubled

Changing then
>>
>>4130678
>>4130685
Thanks to the answer.
>>
>>4130728
>we would of had 98 dc if we chose niel or another knight

sweet jesus well you can always play the langish or faction knight card but still
F
>>
>>4130667
>>Audacious - Halve AV (Rounding up); Each point of unsaved damage to Foe is doubled.
>>
>>4128904
Me
>>
>>4128904
>>4130695
These are both me
>>
>>4130667
Balanced - AV and Damage remain unchanged. May Re-Roll results of this and next Combat Stance superiority roll.

Nice going there people with the charge rolls now lets get not get carried away.

>>4128988
This is me
>>
>>4130728
Well it makes sense for them to be outmatched once you consider the factors. I'll give you a real life example to illustrate this. During the Crusades, there was a skirmish in which 80 Frankish mounted knights defeated 500 Byzantine soldiers in a direct pitched engagement. Keep in mind that those Byzantine soldiers obviously had far better equipment, training, discipline, morale, and experience than these outlaws that we're facing. There was also no element of surprise like in here. Yet, the mounted Frankish knights still defeated them. Byzantine military manuals advised a commander to avoid direct pitched battles with knights.

Sun Tzu wasn't kidding when he said sheer numbers alone confer no advantage in war if the other factors (leadership, tactics, strategy, logistics, training, experience, morale, equipment, discipline, terrain, defensive position, element of surprise, etc) are not in your favour. You'd have to vastly outnumber your opponent to be able to challenge them if the only advantage you have on them is numerical superiority, while every other factor is in their favour.
>>
>>4130667
>>Audacious - Halve AV (Rounding up); Each point of unsaved damage to Foe is doubled.
>>
>>4130627
>>4130628
>>4130629
>>4130632
>>4130638
>>4130640
>>4130666


Mein gott the absolutely ludicrous amount of extremely non consensual ass play that was just dished out here tickles my balls in the most fabulous ways
>>
>>4130667
>Audacious - Halve AV (Rounding up); Each point of unsaved damage to Foe is doubled.

Let's finish it.
>>
>>4130728
I mean. We can always offer quarter.

>>4130667
>Audacious - Halve AV (Rounding up); Each point of unsaved damage to Foe is doubled.

>>4126142
This is me.

>>4130818
> Namefagging
>>
>>4130818
I do not appreciate namefags
>>
>>4130818
This is some real Foe shit right here.

>>4130667
> Audacious - Halve AV (Rounding up); Each point of unsaved damage to Foe is doubled.

Killing peasants, the Knights favorite battle tactic.
>>
>>4130920
The ones who have relations and ties with the non-combatant women and children will accept an offer of quarter or ask for it since they can't leave them behind. However, the ones who don't have anything to do with the non-combatants would rather flee. It would be quite difficult for mounted troops to chase after someone on foot in the woods. Plus bandits are much better at pathfinding and tracking than direct melee combat.
>>
>>4130920
>>4130922
>Giving a shit about someone namefagging

But I’ll remove it so you pedantic autists dont devolve into spastic fits again and derail the quest once more
>>
>>4130667
>Audacious

K I L L
I
L
L
>>
>>4131103
No new voters this thread anon
>>
>>4130818
>>4131099
>>4131103
You must link to a previous ID.
>>
>>4131105
Ah fuck, forgot he said that. That’s what I get for lurking till late in the thread. Oh well, it be like that sometimes
>>
>>4131117
Forgotten doesn't let people Namefag either, never has.

Lurk moar faggot.
>>
>>4131105
>>4131115
Look at what he posted. If he isn't the guy who got banned earlier, than he's someone who learned nothing from what happened to the guy. He went straight to directly insulting people.

Just ignore him.
>>
>Not knowing who Cursed is

Have a little respect for one of the few proper good QMs
>>
>>4131283
I mean, he came in, namefagged, and started insulting people right away.

I'm already not much of a fan. Your response is already a really good argument against namefagging.

Besides, not like he dropped a trip. Anyways, let's not get all dramatic about it.
>>
>>4131099
You're pretty upset, but as long as you get rid of it we're cool
>>
>>4130667
Looking at that pic, it just ocurred to me that with our Thorns +1 wealth from encounters, once our finances stabilize then Lances will actually be worth getting and risking having them break.
>>
>>4131653
Oh shit yeah with that we do get Wealth after engagements. Yeah we have active incentive to bring possibly excessive amounts of violence as often as possible
>>
>>4131653
That's a good point anon, nice catch
>>
Rolls will commence in 1 hour.

Given the volume of rolls, new rollers will not be necessary.
>>
>>4132246
Awesome
>>
>>4132246
Time to slay some Knaves!
>>
Rolled 98 (1d100)

lets get this terrible roll out of the way
>>
My body is ready
>>
File: Glorious Charge!.jpg (310 KB, 1600x1136)
310 KB
310 KB JPG
> 8 Damage Inflicted!
> ‘Snaps’ Wesley, Bandit Swordsman is SLAIN!
> Dolf Brittle, Bandit Axeman is SLAIN!
> Erskin of Darbyshire, Bandit Swordsman is Injured!
> +2 Battle Progress! [7/10]

The camp erupts into a panic as the scurrying vermin scramble in every direction, anywhere but under the thunderous hooves of the charging knights. It does them little good, your formation crashes into their shambolic lines with the fury of Cain.

The bandit that Jess shot earlier stumbles into the path of Mikail’s steed. He leaps out of the way by a stroke of good fortune, only to meet his end under the merciless steel-shod hooves of your own princely Hannibal. Your prized warhorse barely even registers the crumpled form left behind in his wake, steering towards the nearest frightened brigand like a griffinhawk diving after a panicked pigeon.

Your noble steed knows his rider’s reach well, you are perfectly positioned to allow your blade to flick out and catch the hapless bandit on the side of the skull. Bone, brain and other bloody matter is sent flying into the air as everything from the jawbone upwards is detached from your target’s head It is barely even a swing really, the momentum of your charge does most of the grisly work.

The Green Knight, not to be outdone, slashes at a brigand to your right. The man manages to raise his sword in time and parry the first blow, but the second strike chops into his arm with a sound much like that of a cleaver on the butcher’s block. All around you the scene is repeated with much the same brutally effective results. The white cloaks of the Knights Comitas are spattered with bloody flecks from their faithless victims and those bandits not currently fighting for their lives are already considering potential escape routes even as the sprinting Reclaimaint zealots finally catch up and join the melee.

[1/2]
>>
Rolled 27, 56, 26 = 109 (3d100)

[2/2]

Fenegan, 21st Day of Novrimun, 883 A.C.E. – Far West Fallavon Woodlands
Assault on the West Wood Bandit Camp
>Audacious - Halve AV (Rounding up); Each point of unsaved damage to Foe is doubled.
> Battle Progress: OVERWHELMING FORCE (70DC).
> Righteous Zeal: +10DC to Battle Progress (80DC)
> Skirmish (dozens of combatants): Winning Personal Combat will add +20DC to Battle Progress and +1 Battle Re-Roll
> Mounted & Holds Initiative: You will have free reign to make tactical choices at the conclusion or even during the melee.

Sir Emile Andrei, Young Knight of Romaine: Healthy
Young Lord Damien Andrei, The Green Knight: Healthy
Mikail of Andryski, Squire to Sir Andrei: Healthy
Jess the Kid, Longbowman: Healthy
>Combat = +75DC [Healthy +5DC, Strong +5DC, Castle-forged Arming Sword +5DC, Breastplate and Helm +10DC, Blademaster +10DC, Sore Shoulder -1DC, Mikail +7DC, Young Lord Andrei +15DC, Law of Adam +4DC, Mounted +10DC, Might of Ursen +5DC]
>Armour Value = 27AV [Breastplate and Helm +20AV, Heater Shield +20AV, Guardian +6AV, Basilisk Scale Shirt +7AV] /2 Audacious
>Combat Re-Rolls = 5 [Holy Orders +1, Courageous Sky +1, Blessed Artefact +1, Bear Totem +1, Young Lord Andrei (BFL) +1]
>Armour Value Re-Rolls = 1 [Shield of Faith +1 Re-Roll]

VS

‘Snaps’ Wesley, Bandit Swordsman: SLAIN
Dolf Brittle, Bandit Axeman: SLAIN
Erskin of Darbyshire, Bandit Swordsman: Injured
Erskin of Elsewhere, Bandit Axeman: Healthy
Dild the Bastard, Bandit Swordsman: Healthy
Rowan ‘Righteous’, Bandit Swordsman: Healthy
Fleek the Padfoot, Knife-thrower: Healthy
Quelf Ruddy, Bowman: Healthy
>Combat = +35DC [Healthy +5DC, Steel Blade +0, Battle Brother x5 +30DC]
> Armour Value = Armour Value = 20AV [Leather Armour +10AV, Round Wooden Shield +15AV, Avenger -5DC]
>Combat Re-Rolls = 0
>Armour Value Re-Rolls = 0

===================

(1) Personal Combat
> 90 DC
> You have 5 re-rolls
> 3 rolls of 1d100.

(2) Destrier Attack
> 33 DC
> 1 roll of 1d100.

(3) Friendly Ranged Combat
>Jess the Kid: Longbow – Long Range 40 DC
>Jess will focus on Ranged Opponents first. (no risk of friendly fire unless ordered otherwise)
>1 Roll of 1d100

(4) Battle Progress: Overwhelming Force
> Righteous Zeal +10DC
> 80DC
> 3 rolls of 1d100.

(5) Foe Ranged Combat
> Fleek the Padfoot: Throwing Knives – Short Range 40 DC (x2 on first round)
> Quelf Ruddy: Shortbow – Short Range 50 DC
> QM rolls 3d100 (in order listed)


8 rolls of 1d100, kniggas.

Press forward! Send them to the Pit!
>>
Rolled 94 (1d100)

>>4132293
WITNESS ME
>>
Rolled 11 (1d100)

>>4132292
>>
Rolled 72 (1d100)

>>4132293
DEUS VULT

>>4130696
Me
>>
Rolled 13 (1d100)

>>4132293
ALMIGHT WILLS IT
>>
Rolled 18 (1d100)

>>4132292
>>
>>4132293
>>4132300
Sorry linked to the wrong post.
>>
Rolled 12 (1d100)

>>4132294
We have 5 rerolls so I'll just use one on my pathetic failure here. Ok
>>
Rolled 80 (1d100)

>>4132293
>>
>>4132305
wew
>>
fuck forgot about ranged that will hit our Armour at 27 as
>>
Rolled 9 (1d100)

>>4132293
>>
Rolled 47 (1d100)

>>4132293
>>
>all passed and double in personal combat
>>
Nice rolling anons especially this>>4132295 dub.
>>
Now we wait for the knife that goes for the eye slit.
>>
Rolled 3, 2 = 5 (2d3)

Rolling to see where the two Foe ranged hits land.

As they are panicked on focused on the immediate threat, Jess is not included.

1 = Sir Andrei
2 = The Green Knight
3 = Mikail
>>
Rolled 39 (1d100)

>>4132293
>>
I need one roll of 1d100 for The Green Knight. Their AV is unaffected by your stance.
>AV 40


I need one roll of 1d100 for Mikail.
>AV 15

2 rolls of 1d100. 1st for your brother, 2nd for Mikail. You have ONE re-roll (Shield of Faith)
>>
>>4132327
Mikail! No!
>>4132331
>>
Rolled 53 (1d100)

>>4132331
>>
Rolled 91 (1d100)

>>4132331
Mikail
>>
Rolled 61 (1d100)

>>4132331
>>
Rolled 34 (1d100)

>>4132331
>>
Rolled 82 (1d100)

Rolling AV for Jess the Kid's shot (unaffected by Audacious stance).

> Armour Value = 15AV [Leather Armour +10AV, Round Wooden Shield +15AV, Longrange Longbow Piercing -10DC]
>>
I'll save the reroll just in case we nat 100
>>
>>4132340
can't reroll a nat 100
>>
>>4132334
>>4132331
The odds are terrible so I wont waste the re-roll either. Sorry Mikail
>>
>>4132340
Isn't it available for use per round?
>>
>>4132341
can reroll the as saves from it though
>>
Rolled 35, 56, 63, 76 = 230 (4d100)

Rolling 4d100 for the bandits AV from your personal and destrier attacks. Any unsaved damage (including the 11) is doubled.

> Armour Value = 20AV [Leather Armour +10AV, Round Wooden Shield +15AV, Avenger -5DC]
>>
>>4132343
not sure
>>
The Almighty has smiled upon us today!
>>
>>4132343
>>4132346

>UNLOCKED His Heart Knows Only Virtue: Holy Orders +1 Combat Re-Roll+1 Step on the Path of Adam [12]
>UNLOCKED (12) Shield of Faith: +1 AV re-roll per combat round (companions or self).

Its per round.

>>4132333
>>4132334


One of you, REROLL.
>>
Rolled 57 (1d100)

>>
>>4132349
The roll should be for Damien, its much more likely to succeed but if old mate doesn't within the next 5 mins I'll re-roll
>>
>>4132351
>>4132349
i tried
>>
>>4132352
Agreed. His has the best chance of success.
>>
>>4132351
>>4132353
Oh well. We tried.
>>
I just realised I have a new ID due to a power outage today so this is me

>>4130731
>>
>9 Damage Inflicted

Yikes, that will surely win you the battle. Mikail and your brother are both reduced to Battered, but otherwise none the worse for wear.

No content update tonight gents. However I will present the options following the immediate aftermath where the skirmish becomes a rout.

===========================

>You ride down those still trying to flee for the treeline, starting with the archers. Cutting down fleeing infantry is something that every knight knows how to do as a matter of course. [Haughty]

>You swing about and help finish the few scattered groups of frantic bandits holding out. The fanatics are zealous but not born warriors, some could get hurt by bandits that find themselves trapped like rats in a corner. [Hearty]

>You ensure that any prisoners and non-combatants are rounded up with the bare minimum of brutality necessary. Some of your more overzealous troops require a restraining hand. [Idealist]
>>
>>4132357
>>You ride down those still trying to flee for the treeline, starting with the archers. Cutting down fleeing infantry is something that every knight knows how to do as a matter of course. [Haughty]

We can't let people escape, it'll just allow this situation to continue but with more caution on the bandits part
>>
Our companions take some damage but otherwise this was excellent rolling anons.

By the way Forgotten why was there no Staggering Blows effect?
>>
>>4132357
>>You swing about and help finish the few scattered groups of frantic bandits holding out. The fanatics are zealous but not born warriors, some could get hurt by bandits that find themselves trapped like rats in a corner. [Hearty]

I'd say the safety of the pilgrims comes first. If we're around, we can make sure that not too many non-combatants get wacked.
>>
>>4132357
11 forgotten
5 damage including the double x 2 + 1 from jess
>You swing about and help finish the few scattered groups of frantic bandits holding out. The fanatics are zealous but not born warriors, some could get hurt by bandits that find themselves trapped like rats in a corner. [Hearty]
>>
>>4132357
>You ride down those still trying to flee for the treeline, starting with the archers. Cutting down fleeing infantry is something that every knight knows how to do as a matter of course. [Haughty]
>>
>>4132359
In the last combat round 8 Damage was (effectively) 2 kills. I don’t think staggering blows should carry over from deceased opponents.
>>
>>4132357
>You swing about and help finish the few scattered groups of frantic bandits holding out. The fanatics are zealous but not born warriors, some could get hurt by bandits that find themselves trapped like rats in a corner. [Hearty]

>You ensure that any prisoners and non-combatants are rounded up with the bare minimum of brutality necessary. Some of your more overzealous troops require a restraining hand. [Idealist]
>>
>>4132361
Strewth, you’re right I think
>>
>>4132357
>You ensure that any prisoners and non-combatants are rounded up with the bare minimum of brutality necessary. Some of your more overzealous troops require a restraining hand. [Idealist]
>>
>>4132357
>You ensure that any prisoners and non-combatants are rounded up with the bare minimum of brutality necessary. Some of your more overzealous troops require a restraining hand. [Idealist]
>>
>>4132357
>You ride down those still trying to flee for the treeline, starting with the archers. Cutting down fleeing infantry is something that every knight knows how to do as a matter of course. [Haughty]

No women or children
>>
>>4132357
>You ensure that any prisoners and non-combatants are rounded up with the bare minimum of brutality necessary. Some of your more overzealous troops require a restraining hand. [Idealist]
>>
>>4132357
>You ensure that any prisoners and non-combatants are rounded up with the bare minimum of brutality necessary. Some of your more overzealous troops require a restraining hand. [Idealist]
>>
>>4132357
>You ride down those still trying to flee for the treeline, starting with the archers. Cutting down fleeing infantry is something that every knight knows how to do as a matter of course. [Haughty]
>>
>>4132357
>>You ride down those still trying to flee for the treeline, starting with the archers. Cutting down fleeing infantry is something that every knight knows how to do as a matter of course. [Haughty]
>>
>>4132357
>You ensure that any prisoners and non-combatants are rounded up with the bare minimum of brutality necessary. Some of your more overzealous troops require a restraining hand. [Idealist]
>>
>>4132357
>You ensure that any prisoners and non-combatants are rounded up with the bare minimum of brutality necessary. Some of your more overzealous troops require a restraining hand. [Idealist]
>>
>implyieng dirty forest brigands (faithless murderers!) need protection from being manhandled on apprehension
Hold up, I thought we wuz a bear and not a teddy bear
>>
>>4132397
The protection is for the non-combatant women and children who are obviously defenceless and don't have protection.
>>
>>4132357
>>You swing about and help finish the few scattered groups of frantic bandits holding out. The fanatics are zealous but not born warriors, some could get hurt by bandits that find themselves trapped like rats in a corner. [Hearty]

The zealots will probably be more willing to show mercy if none of them died here, as willing as they are to martyr themselves. Besides we're bound by our duty to protect the pilgrims, even if they are fighting beside us.
>>
>>4132357
>You ride down those still trying to flee for the treeline, starting with the archers. Cutting down fleeing infantry is something that every knight knows how to do as a matter of course. [Haughty]
Let none escape.
>>
>>4132357
>>You ride down those still trying to flee for the treeline, starting with the archers. Cutting down fleeing infantry is something that every knight knows how to do as a matter of course. [Haughty]
>>
I'm curious about how the law of adam treats this, Cainites consider this extension of the fallen world apparently and that it should be reclaimed by the righteous but we have heard little about how the law of adam would treat this situation, women and children included.
>>
>>4132451
I say we spare the women and children while we drag anyone older than Mikail to the local lord to dispence justice.
>>
>>4132454
I mean anywhere else and I'd agree wholly but considering we just dueled a lordling for his brand of ''justice'' I'm hesitant to put stock into Fallavon justice, the other case is what to do with the women & children considering we have effectively removed most masculine aid they may have needed to survive in Fallavon & that they were at least collaborating with the bandits for mutual survival.
>>
>>4132357
>>You ensure that any prisoners and non-combatants are rounded up with the bare minimum of brutality necessary. Some of your more overzealous troops require a restraining hand. [Idealist]
>>
>>4125209
Me

>>4132357
>You ensure that any prisoners and non-combatants are rounded up with the bare minimum of brutality necessary. Some of your more overzealous troops require a restraining hand. [Idealist]
>>
>>4114090
>>4115891
These are me.

>>4132357
>You ensure that any prisoners and non-combatants are rounded up with the bare minimum of brutality necessary. Some of your more overzealous troops require a restraining hand. [Idealist]
>>
>>4132357
>You swing about and help finish the few scattered groups of frantic bandits holding out. The fanatics are zealous but not born warriors, some could get hurt by bandits that find themselves trapped like rats in a corner. [Hearty
I think this was the easiest battle we have been in.
>>4130763
This is me
>>
>>4132357
>You ensure that any prisoners and non-combatants are rounded up with the bare minimum of brutality necessary. Some of your more overzealous troops require a restraining hand. [Idealist]

There's women and children in the camp. Otherwise it would be Haughty all day.
>>
>>4132357
>You swing about and help finish the few scattered groups of frantic bandits holding out. The fanatics are zealous but not born warriors, some could get hurt by bandits that find themselves trapped like rats in a corner. [Hearty]
>>
>>4132357
>>You ensure that any prisoners and non-combatants are rounded up with the bare minimum of brutality necessary. Some of your more overzealous troops require a restraining hand. [Idealist]
>>
>>4132293
I want to know more about Erskin of Elsewhere.

Where does he come from ?
>>
>>4132357
>You swing about and help finish the few scattered groups of frantic bandits holding out. The fanatics are zealous but not born warriors, some could get hurt by bandits that find themselves trapped like rats in a corner. [Hearty]
>>
>>4132357
>You ensure that any prisoners and non-combatants are rounded up with the bare minimum of brutality necessary. Some of your more overzealous troops require a restraining hand. [Idealist]

>>4130920
>This is me
>>
>>4132357
>You swing about and help finish the few scattered groups of frantic bandits holding out. The fanatics are zealous but not born warriors, some could get hurt by bandits that find themselves trapped like rats in a corner. [Hearty]
>>
>>4132644
Not here, obviously
>>
>>4132357
>You ride down those still trying to flee for the treeline, starting with the archers. Cutting down fleeing infantry is something that every knight knows how to do as a matter of course. [Haughty]

Need to finish them, or they’ll just return to prey on the weak
>>
>>4132357
>You ride down those still trying to flee for the treeline, starting with the archers. Cutting down fleeing infantry is something that every knight knows how to do as a matter of course. [Haughty]
Those bandits, although maybe kind of forced to do so, chose the life of an outlaw, preying on the weak. Unforgivable.
>>
>>4133517
Ironically the characters you posted let outlaws go repeatedly.
>>
They should thank Almighty God that this is Sir Emile Andrei, an actual chivalrous and honourable knight, and not some knob in armour faggot like Sir Jean Sinclair. Jean Sinclair would've massacred them all including the non-combatant women and children without a shred of empathy, mercy, or remorse.

Considering all the members that have been slain in this battle and all the prisoners that have been captured, I doubt that they will have the strength to prey on anyone again even at the side roads let alone the Kingsroad after we've destroyed them and scattered them. It was because of all the Order of Names' forces being occupied in the deep Fallavon woods and the influx of faction knights and Langlish mercenary new recruits from Mal Country that they were able to become this threatening. They will be too week and too few to do anything but poach for survival even if they manage to regroup after this. The Order of Names will be returning soon too.

This skirmish will enhance our reputation and raise our fame. The people of these lands and the Lord of Darbyshire will be incredibly grateful to us for our deed here I imagine.
>>
>>4134058
I don't think Jean Sinclair would have cut down the prisoners and non-combatants since he is a blademaster which means he swore the His Blade Defends the Helpless knight's code. The other knights have to adhere to their sworn knight's codes just like Emile. Jean is a twat, but he's still a knight who adheres to the knight's codes, oaths, and vows that he took and sworn.
>>
>>4134058
Do you ever stop ranting? Forgotten silenced your votes for it.
Put a fuckin lid on it anon
>>
>>4134062
I'm not ranting or even debating mate. I'm just discussing the quest so chill.

>>4134059
Yeah, that's true.
>>
>>4134059
I mean he's ruthless and cruel to those who would abandon their position under him and these people seem to occupy a discrepency in the law of adam considering they live outside the institutions the laws uphold so we can't be sure if its right to apply it to them, it could be very well a train of thought that these people aren't subject to the knightly vows a knight holds because they have rejected the godly institutions Canton holds.

quite a horrendous though that almost certainly Emille wouldn't consider.
>>
>>4134058
yeah sinclair even by all knightly oaths was in the right to punish the peasant we just disagreed with the severity of the the punishment i doubt he would kill women and children but he would hang draw and quarter these men as an example to all may even keep em alive kill em slow like that guy in the deep woods fallavon is a unruly land whether the draconian punishment came first or the bandits and blue jays is unknown to us so honestly i don't hate the guy it might just be the ruthlessness required for this area
>>
>>4132358
Checking my ID is the same
>>
File: Pilgrim.png (54 KB, 288x412)
54 KB
54 KB PNG
>You ensure that any prisoners and non-combatants are rounded up with the bare minimum of brutality necessary. Some of your more overzealous troops require a restraining hand. [Idealist]

------------------------------------------------

In the chaotic rout, one of the pilgrims bites off more than they can chew.

I need 4 rolls 1d100 for their AV save. I will allow your Shield of Faith re-roll to be used for one of these as well. He will need it.. If he dies you will not be considered to have failed your task of protecting the pilgrims.

> Brother Riche of St. Gabriel’s Gate, Reclaimaint Zealot - Untested Loyalty
> Armour Value = 15 [Thick Wool Coat +5AV, Buckler +10AV]
>>
Rolled 78 (1d100)

>>4134107
>>
Rolled 50 (1d100)

>>4134107
>>
Rolled 90 (1d100)

>>4134107
>>
Rolled 34 (1d100)

>>4134107
>>
File: skelltone.jpg (35 KB, 583x439)
35 KB
35 KB JPG
Rolled 73 (1d100)

>>4134110
using shield of faith reroll
>>
Rolled 93 (1d100)

>>4134108
Re-rolling?
>>
Do I re-roll?
>>
>>4134113
>>4134112 seems to have beaten me to it
>>
>>4134112
>>4134113
Dang it
>>
>>4134108
>>4134109
>>4134110
>>4134111
>>4134112
>>4134113
Bloody hell. What a sad loss. At leas he got his desired wish of a pious martyrdom death. May God Almighty bless his pious soul and may he rest at heaven in the afterlife.
>>
F
>>
>>4134120
>leas
*Least
>>
also shouldn't mikail have 25 av from buckler and chain?
>>
F and rest in peace. Let's make sure to give him and the other fallen a good and honourable proper burial with Father Towbray presiding over the funeral.
>>
What a waste.

They were our charges, those we were sworn to protect. We owed our duty more to them then the hanger-ons of bandits and highwaymen.
>>
>>4134148
Anons cared more about treating bandits gently it looks like
>>
File: Victory!.jpg (1.07 MB, 3500x1715)
1.07 MB
1.07 MB JPG
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EspwQ6Phw0g – Sounds of Battle

>+2 Battle Progress [9/10]
>11 Damage Inflicted!
>Erskin of Darbyshire is SLAIN!
>Erskin of Elsewhere is SLAIN!
>Fleek the Padfoot, Knife-thrower is SLAIN!
>Quelf Ruddy, Bowman is Battered!
>Mikail, Squire to Sir Andrei is Battered!
>Young Lord Andrei, The Green Knight is Battered!
>Personal Combat is at 100DC, Personal Combat Victory! +20DC to Battle Progress.
>Battle Progress is at 100DC, your side has achieved Victory!
> To the Victor, The Spoils… +1 Wealth [5]

One of the bandits, a mean looking sort with a broken nose, tries to grab at Hannibal’s reigns as you finish off his comrade. He soon learns that your warhorse is trained to savagely bite at any fool who attempts such a thing, something even the greenest stablehand would know. Broken Nose wails as his hand crunches under the teeth of your mighty destrier, a sound that is swiftly cut off when you sink your blade through his throat down to the hilt.

Your brother finishes off their own wounded opponent with another deep cut, shearing through the man’s arm with his Faerune blade and leaving him to bleed out in the dirt. The Green Knight whirls around, a piece of fletching sticking out of his breastplate. His armour holds, leaving no mark other than perhaps an uncomfortable bruise later on. Your squire is similarly lucky, the first thrown knife flicks past his ear and the second nicks his cheek before he urges his nag onwards and buries his hatchet in the skull of the panicked knife-thrower.

You pull Hannibal’s reign in, chomping at the bit at a frightened woman and child caught in your path, to find yourself without an opponent. A giant, covered in the blood of her neighbours and riding a beast that strains to crush her underhoof like the others before her. To the girl, some bandit’s woman no doubt, you must look like a steel forged fiend out of hell. She cowers under your gaze, a cold stare peering from the corner of your visor as you struggle to calm your hellbeast.

She grabs the waif and runs before you can think of anything to say. You have more pressing issues than one outlaw woman anyhow, Mikail is struggling to restrain the bowman as he attempts to flee. The pommel of your sword over the back of the bandit’s skull puts an end to that issue. You hit a little too hard, feeling the man’s skull shatter like eggshell and the bottom of your pommel comes up sticky. Oh well, he did have his chance to yield.

[1/3]
>>
File: Enraged priest.png (405 KB, 340x499)
405 KB
405 KB PNG
>You ensure that any prisoners and non-combatants are rounded up with the bare minimum of brutality necessary. Some of your more overzealous troops require a restraining hand. [Idealist]
> Brother Riche of St. Gabriel’s Gate, Reclaimaint Zealot is SLAIN!

“Our losses?” You dismount as the Knights Comitas finish herding the surrendered and wounded together. Those too far gone they finish off, more out of mercy than spite.

”One of the pilgrims.” Brother Gaspard rasps, leaning forward in his saddle and catching his breath. “Took an axe to the face, he’s breathing his last now.”

”Damn.” You mutter, spotting the shirtless Father Towbray kneeling in the mud over the fallen pilgrim. Evidently the pilgrim has expired, for the priest rises with tears in his eyes and storms towards you.

“Your Reverence, my condolences…” You pause mid-sentence as you spot the rampant fire in his eyes, clouded over with rage and zeal both.

“Perfidious pustules of the Pit!” Father Towbray brushes past you, brandishing his flail at the gaggle of prisoners being rounded up. “Vile villainous cretins! Beastlovers! You sordid scum weren’t worth Brother Riche’s spare spit! Curse you! Curse you to the Pit, I say!”

[2/3]
>>
[3/3]

“Father Towbray!” You are forced to physically restrain the priest, the wiry old man writhes in your grasp with surprising strength but you have a hold on him. Your brother leaps from his own mount and assists, eventually you calm the priest down enough to reason with him. “Your Reverence, this is not the way! They have yielded! The field is ours.”

“No… No, you’re right, of course. I…” The zealous priest may not fear death, and indeed see martyrdom as a great thing, but he clearly cared for his followers. Flustered and shamefaced, the man makes his excuses and stalks away. “…sometimes it’s hard to see the plan of it all, Reginae forgive me…”

Of the whole camp, two-score included the womenfolk and children, perhaps half have escaped into the woods. Nearly a dozen lie dead or dying in the wake of your assault, with a further eight taken prisoner. That leaves anywhere from a dozen to a score of bandits that have eluded your assault, had you the numbers to spare that would have been a fraction less. Still, they will not soon forget this day. The memory of the men in armoured steel riding down their cronies with righteous fury will doubtless make them think twice in retaining their current profession.

You had worried for a moment that you had by some ill-fate attacked an illicit but otherwise peaceful settlement. Irrational of course, given the number of armed men present, and even then technically permitted by law. Still, you are relieved when Mikail shows you the scavenged assortment of ill-gotten good that come from all sorts of sources. Spare merchant goods in poor repair, blades and equipment a blacksmith wouldn’t look twice at and all manner of petty items of wealth that might belong to the smallfolk waylaid on the road.

You wonder if the previous owners of these items are dead or merely robbed.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

> You take the lion’s share of the loot, as is yours by right of command, and let your subordinates divide the rest. Most of it is hardly worth the trouble of carrying, but there are some luxuries that can be traded off when you pass through Darbyshire. Gain +1 Wealth. [Haughty]

> The ‘winnings’ as they were, are divided equally between the knights and pilgrims for their efforts. At the end of the day, you’re left with an odd assortment of ill-fitting gear that will allow you to equip Orin in some second-hand gear. Gain Standard Outfit for Hireling [Hearty]

> You let the knights and pilgrims divide up the stolen goods between them, but you set aside half to be donated to the Church. Most of this stolen wealth was taken from pilgrims, honest Almighty-fearing smallfolk. The least you can do is see that some of it makes it way back into the right hands. [Idealist]
>>
>>4134152
>> The ‘winnings’ as they were, are divided equally between the knights and pilgrims for their efforts. At the end of the day, you’re left with an odd assortment of ill-fitting gear that will allow you to equip Orin in some second-hand gear. Gain Standard Outfit for Hireling [Hearty]
>>
File: QM holidays.jpg (69 KB, 530x640)
69 KB
69 KB JPG
Thread is archived here:
http://suptg.thisisnotatrueending.com/qstarchive.html?tags=Sworn%20to%20Valour

I will try to get in one more update tomorrow before I head up to the farm for the weekend. Even I can't provide that last update, I would like to say now that I have enjoyed the more chill atmosphere in the latter half of this thread and hope that we can continue that in future threads.
>>
>>4134148
It's one zealot pilgrim who wanted to die as a martyred warrior. We protected our charges and told them to head to safety in Darbyshire. These ones joined us as combatants out of their own free will rather than head to safety with the others.

>>4134149
Why didn't you vote for hearty if you really cared about making sure none of the pilgrim fighters died? Seems like you just wanted to chase and kill all fleeing opponents rather than protect anyone be they the pilgrim fighters or non-combatant women and children.


>>4134152
>The ‘winnings’ as they were, are divided equally between the knights and pilgrims for their efforts. At the end of the day, you’re left with an odd assortment of ill-fitting gear that will allow you to equip Orin in some second-hand gear. Gain Standard Outfit for Hireling [Hearty]

>You let the knights and pilgrims divide up the stolen goods between them, but you set aside half to be donated to the Church. Most of this stolen wealth was taken from pilgrims, honest Almighty-fearing smallfolk. The least you can do is see that some of it makes it way back into the right hands. [Idealist]

Time to equip Orin with some decent gear.
>>
>>4134152
>> The ‘winnings’ as they were, are divided equally between the knights and pilgrims for their efforts. At the end of the day, you’re left with an odd assortment of ill-fitting gear that will allow you to equip Orin in some second-hand gear. Gain Standard Outfit for Hireling [Hearty]
>>
>>4134152
>> The ‘winnings’ as they were, are divided equally between the knights and pilgrims for their efforts. At the end of the day, you’re left with an odd assortment of ill-fitting gear that will allow you to equip Orin in some second-hand gear. Gain Standard Outfit for Hireling [Hearty]
this will go towards the church either way our company better equip means we have a better chance of seeing this pilgrimage through
>>
>>4134152
>The ‘winnings’ as they were, are divided equally between the knights and pilgrims for their efforts. At the end of the day, you’re left with an odd assortment of ill-fitting gear that will allow you to equip Orin in some second-hand gear. Gain Standard Outfit for Hireling [Hearty]
>>
>>4134152
>The ‘winnings’ as they were, are divided equally between the knights and pilgrims for their efforts. At the end of the day, you’re left with an odd assortment of ill-fitting gear that will allow you to equip Orin in some second-hand gear. Gain Standard Outfit for Hireling [Hearty]

>You let the knights and pilgrims divide up the stolen goods between them, but you set aside half to be donated to the Church. Most of this stolen wealth was taken from pilgrims, honest Almighty-fearing smallfolk. The least you can do is see that some of it makes it way back into the right hands. [Idealist]
>>
>>4134152
>> The ‘winnings’ as they were, are divided equally between the knights and pilgrims for their efforts. At the end of the day, you’re left with an odd assortment of ill-fitting gear that will allow you to equip Orin in some second-hand gear. Gain Standard Outfit for Hireling [Hearty]
>>
>>4134152
>> The ‘winnings’ as they were, are divided equally between the knights and pilgrims for their efforts. At the end of the day, you’re left with an odd assortment of ill-fitting gear that will allow you to equip Orin in some second-hand gear. Gain Standard Outfit for Hireling [Hearty]
>>
>>4134154
Missed a bunch of updates due to real life but the sound effects and writing were great. Cheers Forgotten
>>
>>4134152
> The ‘winnings’ as they were, are divided equally between the knights and pilgrims for their efforts. At the end of the day, you’re left with an odd assortment of ill-fitting gear that will allow you to equip Orin in some second-hand gear. Gain Standard Outfit for Hireling [Hearty]
Better we get this out of the way now, to start making him useful.
>>
>>4134152
>The ‘winnings’ as they were, are divided equally between the knights and pilgrims for their efforts. At the end of the day, you’re left with an odd assortment of ill-fitting gear that will allow you to equip Orin in some second-hand gear. Gain Standard Outfit for Hireling [Hearty]
>>
>>4132378
This is me
>>
>>4134152
>The ‘winnings’ as they were, are divided equally between the knights and pilgrims for their efforts. At the end of the day, you’re left with an odd assortment of ill-fitting gear that will allow you to equip Orin in some second-hand gear. Gain Standard Outfit for Hireling [Hearty]
>>4134155
I was being an asshole
>>
>>4134152
>You let the knights and pilgrims divide up the stolen goods between them, but you set aside half to be donated to the Church. Most of this stolen wealth was taken from pilgrims, honest Almighty-fearing smallfolk. The least you can do is see that some of it makes it way back into the right hands. [Idealist]
>>
>>4134152
> The ‘winnings’ as they were, are divided equally between the knights and pilgrims for their efforts. At the end of the day, you’re left with an odd assortment of ill-fitting gear that will allow you to equip Orin in some second-hand gear. Gain Standard Outfit for Hireling [Hearty]

I would like to make sure that a portion of the loot is held in trust, to be given to the slain man’s family. A weregeld of sorts, somwthing for the family to get through hard times now that their man is gone.
>>
Forgotten, I have some lore prompt questions. It's no problem if you don't answer any ones that are OOC metagaming that would be outside of Emile's knowledge.

>Can you tell me about this world's seven wonders?

>What's the closest your world has been to wholesale destruction? (Apocalypse)

>From the Christian cross to the Nike icon, our world is filled with recognisable symbols. What are this world's most widespread symbols? Does the Cantonian Faith have any official symbols?

>A Jolly old man with elves and reindeer in tow comes riding into this world, bearing gifts. How does your world react?

>What’s the most legendary artefact/relic lusted for by adventurers and scholars alike?

>Can you tell me about the hermits of this world?

>Are there any guilds in this world?
>>
>>4134175
Oh then sorry

>>4134178
Supporting
>>
>>4134178
Support of he actually left any family. Same thing with the pilgrim that died at the hands of the wendigo monster in the forest.
>>
>>4134183
*if
>>
>>4134152
>The ‘winnings’ as they were, are divided equally between the knights and pilgrims for their efforts. At the end of the day, you’re left with an odd assortment of ill-fitting gear that will allow you to equip Orin in some second-hand gear. Gain Standard Outfit for Hireling [Hearty]

>You let the knights and pilgrims divide up the stolen goods between them, but you set aside half to be donated to the Church. Most of this stolen wealth was taken from pilgrims, honest Almighty-fearing smallfolk. The least you can do is see that some of it makes it way back into the right hands. [Idealist]

Either are good by me.

>>4134178
+1
>>
>>4134178
Voting to support this too
>>
>>4134152
>You let the knights and pilgrims divide up the stolen goods between them, but you set aside half to be donated to the Church. Most of this stolen wealth was taken from pilgrims, honest Almighty-fearing smallfolk. The least you can do is see that some of it makes it way back into the right hands. [Idealist]

>>4134178
Supporting
>>
>>4134152
> The ‘winnings’ as they were, are divided equally between the knights and pilgrims for their efforts. At the end of the day, you’re left with an odd assortment of ill-fitting gear that will allow you to equip Orin in some second-hand gear. Gain Standard Outfit for Hireling [Hearty]

Supporting >>4134178
>>
>>4134180
Lots of questions, goodness. I've spoilered clear meta where I can.

>Can you tell me about this world's seven wonders?
I don’t think I said there were seven, but of the places considered a ‘wonder’ in the same sense there would be:
The Crescent Palace of Nova Cathagi, a sprawling monolith that is nearly the size of the city of Aubrey by itself. Its mighty halls mark the lair of the Dragon, it takes a full force of hundreds to properly garrison and patrol, of which only a portion is watched by the Dragon Guard.
The Lighthouse of Port Bounty. Marking the edge of the Cathagi Empire of old’s holdings and the ‘end of the world’ on some forgotten mapys, it is located on the outskirts of the Pascae city. Even in disrepair it remains the tallest point on the continent between the west shores and the eastern mountains. The vigil is held on the shores at its base. For the bravest (or insane) the vigil is held in the peaks of the ruins itself, in the middle of storm and thunder.
The Tôrwatcher Gates, impenetrable citadels carved from the mightiest of peaks in Montbrun. Adam himself laid the foundations of the first, though it would be centuries after his death before they neared completions.
The Aeiltin Allfather of the Deepwood, the first and greatest of all Aeltin trees. Even the bark of these trees are said to hold magical properties, or at least the propensity to contain magic

Fallen Ardenne, the city and citadel itself. Still hauntingly beautiful despite the calamity that befell it, few mortal men have witnessed it or the sights around that dread realm and lived to tell of it.
The End of the World, beyond the endless Frozen straits where the plane of existence itself drops off into nothingness. This is, of course, nonsense. The only Norsikaans who have returned are… sinisterly changed. Given their taste for human flesh, they are also quite obviously lunatics.
There are other cities and wonders of man to the south and east, but this is not something Sir Andrei is ever likely to learn of unless he trawls through the Cathagi libraries or braves the southern sands himself.

>What's the closest your world has been to wholesale destruction? (Apocalypse)
The Night of Three Sisters marked a sinister turning point, though I will not commit even meta knowledge to text here. And there are things beyond mortal men that even the Fae fear.
>>
>From the Christian cross to the Nike icon, our world is filled with recognisable symbols. What are this world's most widespread symbols? Does the Cantonian Faith have any official symbols?
The most common depiction is of Salve Reginae in torment, though as we have seen the degree of visible wounds ranges wildly from none visible to horrifically obvious. Cain on the Cross is also a common symbol, though I should note the slavemaster cross takes the form of an ‘X’ rather than the ‘T’ of a roman crucifix. There is no iconography of the Almighty, and crude attempts to capture his image are forbidden under Church law. Adam does not have a recognisable sigil, though balanced scales are often used. There is also the significance of chain iconography that goes beyond that of breaking out from Cathagi bondage, which Emile is only beginning to scratch at.
For Salve Reginae, one hand cupped over the other is meant to represent how Salve Reginae shielded her sons from harm with her love. For the Brothers, a hand clenching the wrist of a raised fist is used to denote the balance of restrained zeal or, in an alternative interpretation, the breaking of a slave’s chains.

>A Jolly old man with elves and reindeer in tow comes riding into this world, bearing gifts. How does your world react?
This is silly. One should never accept gifts from a man who consorts with Fae, no matter how friendly he may seem.
>>
>What’s the most legendary artefact/relic lusted for by adventurers and scholars alike?
Some have been named already, such as Cain’s sword or Adam’s armour. There is also the armour of the Torwatch Grandmaster, an inherently magical item where the bearer takes on the same identity of each previous owner combined.
There is a greatsword wielded by Norsikaan heroes that is said to cut stone like butter and never need sharpening. There is a bow in the Tempest Isles that is whispered to never miss, even if the target is barely visible on the horizon. In Canton especially, items of Aeltin craft or Fae design often have magical properties and are sought after by foreigners.
The ruins of Ardenne are rife with long lost relics for the brave and foolhardy. Some may have even resisted the corruption after all these years. Non-magical heirlooms of House Andrei would have been told to Sir Andrei in stories since childhood, but I’m not willing to divulge anything further unless anons actively seek to research potential artefacts both foreign and domestic.

>Can you tell me about the hermits of this world?
I’m not sure what you mean? I may have already mentioned the cannibalistic wanderers of the Frozen straits and the introverted sorts that keep to themselves in the Fallavon woods but I imagine you mean something else.

>Are there any guilds in this world?
In Pascae and Langland certainly. In Cathagi the lines between ‘guilds’ and ladders in the merchant class is hard to distinguish.
If you mean something more along the lines of a ‘thieves guild’ not officially, though there is the Casteless Prince in Cathagi, sort of like a guild of the homeless and other lowlifes. And there are warrior lodges in Norsikaa and Freeblade Company headquarters like there are secular knightly brotherhoods in Canton, which I suppose are their own form of ‘fighters guilds’.
>>
File: 1367090251720.jpg (51 KB, 448x488)
51 KB
51 KB JPG
>>4134227
>For the bravest (or insane) the vigil is held in the peaks of the ruins itself, in the middle of storm and thunder.

I have a mighty need

>And there are things beyond mortal men that even the Fae fear.

I want to smite them
>>
>>4134227
>Even in disrepair it remains the tallest point on the continent between the west shores and the eastern mountains
*tallest man-made structure
>>
>>4134227
>>4134229
>>4134232
Thanks for all the answers Forgotten. If you liked them, then I can post more lore prompt questions at the end of this thread's run.
>>
>>4134152

> The ‘winnings’ as they were, are divided equally between the knights and pilgrims for their efforts. At the end of the day, you’re left with an odd assortment of ill-fitting gear that will allow you to equip Orin in some second-hand gear. Gain Standard Outfit for Hireling [Hearty

>>4132498
Thus is me
>>
>>4134152
> The ‘winnings’ as they were, are divided equally between the knights and pilgrims for their efforts. At the end of the day, you’re left with an odd assortment of ill-fitting gear that will allow you to equip Orin in some second-hand gear. Gain Standard Outfit for Hireling [Hearty].

This seema fair.
>>
>>4132654
>This is me
>>4134274
>>
>>4134232
>>4134229
All of this makes me want to go try to reclaim some part of the old Andrei lands after our time in the dragonguard.
>>
>>4134399
>Emille punching undead horrors and worse into the pit with his bare hands

I WANT it
>>
>>4134419
>More snippets about the Andrei family back home
Now that's what I want
>>
>>4134448
I too would like to see how things are doing abck home.
>>
>>4134448
Same
>>
>>4134419
> Not his Bear Hands

> Not having stylized Bear Claw Bracer/Gauntlet combo made so he can wreck people even if he loses his shield.

>>4134399
With the reputation, the money earned to outfit us, and the recommendations we can in turn give out, it would definitely provide the resources for a preliminary expedition. We could probably do it in conjunction with the Church and Romaine forces to establish a Colonial City/Fortress to base future expeditions to reclaim Lost Ardenn.

Slow and steady wins the race in regards to reclaiming land. I mean, yeah, you can kill everything you run into but to truly reclaim it a massive investment is needed.
>>
>>4134152
>> The ‘winnings’ as they were, are divided equally between the knights and pilgrims for their efforts. At the end of the day, you’re left with an odd assortment of ill-fitting gear that will allow you to equip Orin in some second-hand gear. Gain Standard Outfit for Hireling [Hearty]
>>
>>4134152
> The ‘winnings’ as they were, are divided equally between the knights and pilgrims for their efforts. At the end of the day, you’re left with an odd assortment of ill-fitting gear that will allow you to equip Orin in some second-hand gear. Gain Standard Outfit for Hireling [Hearty]
>>
>>4134149
Perfectly in line with Emile choosing to fight Sinclair over a technicality of his oath instead of for a Serfs life. Ideals > People.
>>
>>4134588
> Bear claw gauntlets

The claws go over the fingers when fully extended.

Maybe we could have gone this route if we were a little more Cain orientated, or less CAPTAIN CANTON.

> Maybe Damien can go that route lol.

He needs to learn the lessons of SWOLE from his little brother. Given Damiens . . . Emotional volatility, a more rip n' tear approach might appeal to him. That, and the fact that he seems less concerned about literally getting his hands dirty despite being a "Noble".
>>
>>4134686
When we get a fullplate we could style it with bear-like appearance or motives. No plums.
>>
>>4134842
No plums??!! What bullshit is this?
Plums for life.
>>
>>4134855
No plums for you! Only bear armor.
>>
>>4134855
>>4134907
How about a compromise?

> A bearskin cap used by the Grenadier Guards of the Kingdom of Italy during the Napoleonic Wars.

The only problem is killing a bear in a duel, so as to not offend Ursen. Fuckers eat each other at parties, us wearing some bear they don't know shouldn't be a problem. And if it is, they can throw down too. Winner gets the others skin.
>>
File: paltry loot.jpg (281 KB, 820x539)
281 KB
281 KB JPG
> The ‘winnings’ as they were, are divided equally between the knights and pilgrims for their efforts. At the end of the day, you’re left with an odd assortment of ill-fitting gear that will allow you to equip Orin in some second-hand gear. Gain Standard Outfit for Hireling. [Hearty]

Doubtless the bandits considered themselves wealthy by peasant standards, but to your eye the level of paltry wealth they have accrued for all their misdeeds is pathetic. You have Mikail pick up a few odd pieces of equipment for himself and that new hand of yours, Orin. A tattered gambeson, round shield, spear and pot-helm is hardly the cutting-edge of armaments even for lowly men-at-arms, but it is a darn sight better than a leather tunic and cudgel. The rest holds little interest to you, but you give out instructions that it is to be divided equally among your men with a little held-over for the family of the fallen pilgrim.

Father Towbray informs you that Brother Riche had a sister, married to a blacksmith back in Montbrun. He appreciates the chance to see some wealth into their hands upon his or one of the other Montbrun folks return from the pilgrimage.

The sun has all but set now, darkness is swiftly moving in. You turn to see your sworn man returning from interrogating the prisoners. The women and children are left alone, of course. You are not animals. “Hail, Sir dan Marc. Did they tell you anything of use?”

”Hail, sire. Pleas of innocence, promises of hidden wealth if we let them go and the like. I focused my questioning on their crimes as you said, sire. No hostages present, in the past they ransomed folk back but these days foreigners from the west pay a higher price for their stock.” Sir dan Marc wrinkles his mouth distastefully, clearly sick of their begging. “Two of them claim to know more, with names and possibly where their contacts. But they want assurances they will be free to go once they share the details.”

“That there is an increase in the activity of slavers is known to us, but anything this rabble can say that will help identify them would be…” You cannot decide whether you wish to say ‘useful’ or ‘dangerous’. You had hoped that the last of your involvement with these underworld trafficking was behind you. “I’ve already promised one brigand his freedom for his life. It galls me to let two more walk free just for providing the details of their crimes.”

”You could put them to the question.” Your brother says, rather coldly.

“You surprise me, Green Knight.” You raise an eyebrow at your brother. “I did not think your… ‘sentiment’ would allow it.”

[1/2]
>>
File: Slavers & Bandits.jpg (54 KB, 550x440)
54 KB
54 KB JPG
[2/2]

“I have little pity to spare for those who truck with slavers. Hardship is no excuse, my sympathy is reserved for honest, harmless folk.” The Green Knight shrugs, and you cannot tell how much of that hard face is false bravado. “The more pressing issue is what to do with the rest. Banditry is a hanging offence here as it is anywhere else. Their guilt is obvious, but do we take them to Darbyshire for judgement?”

”Sir Emile Andrei is the senior noble here, and the laws of Fallavon dictate that he has the right to pass sentence as he sees fit.” Sir dan Marc must know that The Green Knight is technically more senior than you, but he goes along with the misdirection for the sake of appearances in front of the others. “None could find fault with you ordering this sorry lot hung at this very moment. But custom also allows you to bring them to the local lord’s attention for judgement. That could help win Darbyshire over, I’m sure.”

“Possibly. But these bandits have plagued the region freely for some time now, bringing this rabble to the local lord’s doorstep for his judgement may be seen as a statement that policing him was his responsibility.” The Green Knight fixes you a meaningful gaze. “A responsibility some might say he has neglected.”

“Or he might be grateful.” Sir dan Marc counters.

”Or he might be grateful.” Your brother concedes.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------

(1) Fallavon Law
> “Mikail, fetch rope. Lots of rope.” The law of Fallavon is clear here, and hanging bandits is by no means an unjustly harsh punishment. Let those who prey on the Kingsroad suffer the same fate, be they bandits or beastfolk. [Haughty]

> “Round them up and get ready to move out. We make for Darbyshire.” You will likely reach the town’s gates in the wee hours of the morning. The Lord of Darbyshire will be grateful to you for removing this threat, surely. [Hearty]

(2) Questioning the bandits. We have established that Sir Andrei finds torture distasteful, but this is to see whether he will allow it if there is obvious guilt. It is also not IC for him to threaten the women and children to get them to talk either.
> “That level of knowledge means a deeper involvement. I will not let such men escape punishment. Question them separately. If their stories do not match up, then we shall take harsher methods of extracting the truth.” [Idealist]

> “Men of their ilk will say anything to save their own hide. Question the two bandits separately, with the promise of freedom and -without- torture. If their stories and details match up, let them go. The bigger picture is more important.” [Idealist]
>>
That's the last update for this thread gents. Thanks for playing and don't forget to upvote the archives!

Taking a short break, given that work and other IRL things are picking up. I will let you know on twitter and the qst catalog when a new thread will commence. Certainly before the end of the month, I should hope.
>>
>>4135002
> “Round them up and get ready to move out. We make for Darbyshire.” You will likely reach the town’s gates in the wee hours of the morning. The Lord of Darbyshire will be grateful to you for removing this threat, surely. [Hearty]

> “That level of knowledge means a deeper involvement. I will not let such men escape punishment. Question them separately. If their stories do not match up, then we shall take harsher methods of extracting the truth.” [Idealist]

Time for a harsher hand.
>>
>>4135004
Thanks for running forgotten.
>>
>>4135002
>> “Mikail, fetch rope. Lots of rope.” The law of Fallavon is clear here, and hanging bandits is by no means an unjustly harsh punishment. Let those who prey on the Kingsroad suffer the same fate, be they bandits or beastfolk. [Haughty]
If we weren't under penance I'd be inclined to let the local lord deal with it, but we've made enough enemies and fudged enough social rolls in Fallavon.
>> “That level of knowledge means a deeper involvement. I will not let such men escape punishment. Question them separately. If their stories do not match up, then we shall take harsher methods of extracting the truth.” [Idealist]
tl;dr, fuck bandits, criminals, and slavers in general.
>>4110758
This is also me.
>>
>>4135002
>> “Round them up and get ready to move out. We make for Darbyshire.” You will likely reach the town’s gates in the wee hours of the morning. The Lord of Darbyshire will be grateful to you for removing this threat, surely. [Hearty]
> “That level of knowledge means a deeper involvement. I will not let such men escape punishment. Question them separately. If their stories do not match up, then we shall take harsher methods of extracting the truth.” [Idealist]
Those who traffic in slaves are utter scum.
>>
>>4135002
> “Mikail, fetch rope. Lots of rope.” The law of Fallavon is clear here, and hanging bandits is by no means an unjustly harsh punishment. Let those who prey on the Kingsroad suffer the same fate, be they bandits or beastfolk. [Haughty]

> “Men of their ilk will say anything to save their own hide. Question the two bandits separately, with the promise of freedom and -without- torture. If their stories and details match up, let them go. The bigger picture is more important.” [Idealist]
>>
>>4135004
Thanks for running forgotten
>>
>>4135002
> “Round them up and get ready to move out. We make for Darbyshire.” You will likely reach the town’s gates in the wee hours of the morning. The Lord of Darbyshire will be grateful to you for removing this threat, surely. [Hearty]

Send a rider ahead to let the Lord know we're coming. We can let him prepare to recieve us in a fashion that protects his pride.

Offer the bandits the chance for confession along the way, to let the rider get ahead a bit.

> “That level of knowledge means a deeper involvement. I will not let such men escape punishment. Question them separately. If their stories do not match up, then we shall take harsher methods of extracting the truth.” [Idealist]

After getting their story from them, separate the bandits visually but where they can still hear each other by putting one in a shack. Tell the remaining one that only one of them needs to tell the truth. Gag the bandit taken to the room and have a zealot that sounds similar start screaming and begging.

Tell the bandit left outside that if he tells you the truth before the other bandit does, he won't be put to the question.

Technically, no lies are being told.
>>
>>4134985
>>4135066
This is me. Also bear plumes
>>
>>4135002
>(1) Fallavon Law
> “Round them up and get ready to move out. We make for Darbyshire.” You will likely reach the town’s gates in the wee hours of the morning. The Lord of Darbyshire will be grateful to you for removing this threat, surely. [Hearty]

>(2) Questioning the bandits. We have established that Sir Andrei finds torture distasteful, but this is to see whether he will allow it if there is obvious guilt. It is also not IC for him to threaten the women and children to get them to talk either.
>> “That level of knowledge means a deeper involvement. I will not let such men escape punishment. Question them separately. If their stories do not match up, then we shall take harsher methods of extracting the truth.” [Idealist]

Writein Addition:
Did the one who killed Brother Riche survive? (Otherwise one particularly bad looking fellow will suffice, just have to make a show of it, like its the knight comitas who begin hanging which leaves us room to step in and halt further hangings.) I propose we outright hang this one first. That will loosen the tongues of those who are willing to spill.
>>
>>4134985
As long as theres plums i dont care about the rest
>>
>>4135002
> “Your Reverence, this is not the way! They have yielded! The field is ours.”

We hung the Beastmen because they refused to yield. Therefore, we should take these men to be judged properly for their crimes. Also so that what we did here isn't misinterpreted deliberately by others who might claim this wasn't a bandit camp.

> “Round them up and get ready to move out. We make for Darbyshire.” You will likely reach the town’s gates in the wee hours of the morning. The Lord of Darbyshire will be grateful to you for removing this threat, surely. [Hearty]

Additionally, it's poor taste to hang them in front of their families. Personally I am wondering what happens of the women and children. Is there a reward for returning Serfs that have fled, if that's what they are? Would the Sister let them join the pilgrimage as penance?

> B4 "They're also guilty", women and children as having agency lol no.

2)

> “That level of knowledge means a deeper involvement. I will not let such men escape punishment. Question them separately. If their stories do not match up, then we shall take harsher methods of extracting
the truth.” [Idealist]

Let Damien do it, since he seems unbothered by it. Definitely not trying to make him a Cain to our Adam, nooooooo.

>>4134277
> this is me.
>>
>>4135002
> “Mikail, fetch rope. Lots of rope.” The law of Fallavon is clear here, and hanging bandits is by no means an unjustly harsh punishment. Let those who prey on the Kingsroad suffer the same fate, be they bandits or beastfolk. [Haughty]

> “That level of knowledge means a deeper involvement. I will not let such men escape punishment. Question them separately. If their stories do not match up, then we shall take harsher methods of extracting the truth.” [Idealist]
>>
>>4135002
> “Round them up and get ready to move out. We make for Darbyshire.” You will likely reach the town’s gates in the wee hours of the morning. The Lord of Darbyshire will be grateful to you for removing this threat, surely. [Hearty

> “That level of knowledge means a deeper involvement. I will not let such men escape punishment. Question them separately. If their stories do not match up, then we shall take harsher methods of extracting the truth.” [Idealist

Thanks for the quest boss man.

>>4134273
Thus is me.
>>
>>4134997
Just found out girl I was talking to had a BF. Thank goodness you updated so I can get my mind off of it. I appreciate you Forgotten
> “Round them up and get ready to move out. We make for Darbyshire.” You will likely reach the town’s gates in the wee hours of the morning. The Lord of Darbyshire will be grateful to you for removing this threat, surely. [Hearty]
> “Men of their ilk will say anything to save their own hide. Question the two bandits separately, with the promise of freedom and -without- torture. If their stories and details match up, let them go. The bigger picture is more important.” [Idealist]
>>
>>4135002
(1)
>Mikail, fetch rope. Lots of rope.” The law of Fallavon is clear here, and hanging bandits is by no means an unjustly harsh punishment. Let those who prey on the Kingsroad suffer the same fate, be they bandits or beastfolk. [Haughty]

(2)
>That level of knowledge means a deeper involvement. I will not let such men escape punishment. Question them separately. If their stories do not match up, then we shall take harsher methods of extracting the truth.” [Idealist]

>>4122916
Previous vote in case of ID change
>>
>>4135143
Sucks to hear, good luck next time anon
>>
>>4134686
I mean if we want to embrace Paganism than sure Bear gauntlets sound fun

I want to attach a silver chain to our shield so we can pull Belmont bullshit fighting the horrors of Ardenne
>>
>>4135305
also Captain Canton bullshit
>>
>>4135305
Add a magic thunder hammer to that.
>>
>>4135002
(1)
> “Round them up and get ready to move out. We make for Darbyshire.” You will likely reach the town’s gates in the wee hours of the morning. The Lord of Darbyshire will be grateful to you for removing this threat, surely. [Hearty]

(2)
> “That level of knowledge means a deeper involvement. I will not let such men escape punishment. Question them separately. If their stories do not match up, then we shall take harsher methods of extracting the truth.” [Idealist]
>>
File: Giles_Corey_restored.jpg (29 KB, 378x226)
29 KB
29 KB JPG
>>4135305
> Belmont level bullshit

Nintendo, PC, or Netflix levels of Belmont Bullshit? Because there are differences.

'M drunk. And you're drunk too. So we really gotta take this idea apart and anylaze it.

Like. We gonna have just heavy fuck chains on the shield edges so STRONK LIKE BEAR Emile can whip the fuck out of people? Or like, just big links around the rim job done to make like a sword breaker kinda shield where we catch swords in the links for some twisty snappy shit? Or just chains wrapped around the shield for more weight, the Burden of Faith we could call it.

Or like just a chain wallet kinda shield we can whip around like a hot topic captain canton because that is the most reasonable and therefore worst plan.
>>
>>4135305
Bear Gauntlets are cainite mithetfuking shit and fuck you Emile is a Defender.
>>
>>4135002
I bet you loved Saint because she was your JoA expy in BCQ you soggy butterstick burningman FrogABoo.

Also can we shitpost now that it's the end of the thread?

Because if not I might have some apologies to make.
>>
>>4135363
considering I only know it through the netflix series which I recently binged and certain memes I'm going to say netflix Belmont

My primary thought was competitve shield throw, but given Silver has been shown to be effective to things from the pit so offensive measures and anti disarming ability might be nice.

>>4135370
wat?
>>
>>4135002
When will Captain Canton face the his Norsikkaan foe, Captain Canadaton?
>>
>>4135380
I saw the netflix series but can't remember much except sexy crazy vampire lady saying "What the fuck just happened" when the fortress was teleporting around. Nearly died laughing because I felt that.

Also Belmont seems like a furry.
>>
>>4134232
>There is a greatsword wielded by Norsikaan heroes that is said to cut stone like butter and never need sharpening

Norsikaan Thor bro when?
>>
>>4135391
Aight I gotta rewatch this.

> https://twitter.com/i/status/1068288917701447680

Also axes are superior ice weapon.
>>
File: unworthy_cover.png (1.04 MB, 630x967)
1.04 MB
1.04 MB PNG
>>4135391
Redemption Thor best Thor.
>>
>>4135391
> https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=lJKNSlirSK8

Okay. French Waifus may not be all bad. I wouldn't mind buttering her bread. Flaps. Breadflaps. Mmm yeasty, tastes the way Paris smells.
>>
>>4135386
Third seasons pretty great, its a lot more solid than the second seasons political crap I mean if nothing else we got this

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ECnTBg3TABo

also toiletpaper

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k8wyp1-oj8E

watching mutiple boards meltdown over a bisexual sex scene is hilarious

>>4135395
>Not caving in your opponents chest through raw force

>>4135403
>Best thor
>Not Thorse
>>
File: xYBtUpS.jpg (29 KB, 330x330)
29 KB
29 KB JPG
>>4135429
1A)
Third season? Fuck yeah good news.

1B)
> Not crushing through your opponents shield through sheer force then splitting them in Twain

1C)

Thorse is . . . A valid rebuttal. But not Cainite enough to balance out Emile.

2A)

> French cuisine, pic related.
>>
File: 1943016003.jpg (5 KB, 213x320)
5 KB
5 KB JPG
>>4135002
> If Swurn 2 Vurlurr was a genuine French Expy setting but with cooking.

The Salve Regina is now Paula Deen. In your head. Can't unthink it.
>>
File: 1943016003(2).jpg (66 KB, 409x614)
66 KB
66 KB JPG
>>4135444
That image is bad. I can do butter.

FOR THE LADY AND SONS!
>>
>>4135429
I'm sorry. I was too caught up in shitposting to watch your links at first.

I now hope dearly that "What the fuck is Toilet Paper" becomes a meme for Emile's first exposure to Carthag's urbane sensibilities and that someone calls him a shit handed tin "can"-ton wastebin.
>>
>>4135453
> The Dragon bestowing wisdom unto Emile
>>
>>4135453
even though I dont particularly like the whole pilgrimage thing, the culture shock from being in Carthaggi will be amazing.
>>
>>4135467
I bet their slaves don't understand why Canton peasants want to be free, when they live such terrible lives in exchange.

Not having any value, being forced to serve without it means that their lives are worth nothing to their masters.

> Slaves bragging about how much they cost to buy.
>>
>>4135002
Do Canton Knights wipe with their bare hands, or do they carry around a shit rag to use? Do peasants ask to sniff it when they worry if they haven't been brown nosing their Lords enough?

How much would you donate for a whiff of the Regina's used shit rag?
>>
>>4135488
The squires duty includes cleaning out leftover poop dust
>>
>>4135484
> Slaves bragging about how much they cost to buy.

y'know thats twisted enough for me to actually believe it.

it's been mentioned somewhere that the dragonguard frequently put down slave revolts in the city so they are almost certainly an unhappy and unruly bunch and its one of the things I feel is glossed over in the giddy need to meet the Dragon.
>>
>>4135497
pretty sure it depends on the slave a famous gladiator or high class courtesan gets treated well but some poor bastard in a mine has both the strength and reason too revolt
>>
>>4135492
I don't think I want to be around threads after Forgotten leaves anymore.
>>
>>4135497
>>4135528
Or they keep putting slaves in positions of authority and they're not so much popular uprisings but internal coup attempts.

We don't know, maybe Slavery goes all the way up. Like Eunuchs in Chinese courts and shit.
>>
>>4135528
> Mines

> Inside the city

[O] Doubt

Maybe they're like the French.

> Riots because they want a 4 day work week with catered lunches.
>>
>>4135002
>(1) Fallavon Law
>“Round them up and get ready to move out. We make for Darbyshire.” You will likely reach the town’s gates in the wee hours of the morning. The Lord of Darbyshire will be grateful to you for removing this threat, surely. [Hearty]

(2) Questioning the bandits.
>“Men of their ilk will say anything to save their own hide. Question the two bandits separately, with the promise of freedom and -without- torture. If their stories and details match up, let them go. The bigger picture is more important.” [Idealist]

Better to have the actual lord of the land judge them.

As for the two they clearly care about their lives and freedom to reveal information, so I think that it will be a better incentive than torture. Make that their info matches with the other and is truthful.
>>
>>4135528
I mean their's probably a distinction but they are still slaves and that nuance shouldn't really mean anything to Emille imo.

>>4135542
Im betting their is some upwards mobility for Slaves willing to play the ''game'' as it were but without knowing the details and reasonings for the caste system its hard to pin.
>>
>>4135002
(1)
>“Round them up and get ready to move out. We make for Darbyshire.” You will likely reach the town’s gates in the wee hours of the morning. The Lord of Darbyshire will be grateful to you for removing this threat, surely. [Hearty]

(2)
>“Men of their ilk will say anything to save their own hide. Question the two bandits separately, with the promise of freedom and -without- torture. If their stories and details match up, let them go. The bigger picture is more important.” [Idealist]
>>
>>4135002
> “Mikail, fetch rope. Lots of rope.” The law of Fallavon is clear here, and hanging bandits is by no means an unjustly harsh punishment. Let those who prey on the Kingsroad suffer the same fate, be they bandits or beastfolk. [Haughty]

> “That level of knowledge means a deeper involvement. I will not let such men escape punishment. Question them separately. If their stories do not match up, then we shall take harsher methods of extracting the truth.” [Idealist]
>>
>>4135002
>“Mikail, fetch rope. Lots of rope.” The law of Fallavon is clear here, and hanging bandits is by no means an unjustly harsh punishment. Let those who prey on the Kingsroad suffer the same fate, be they bandits or beastfolk. [Haughty]

> “That level of knowledge means a deeper involvement. I will not let such men escape punishment. Question them separately. If their stories do not match up, then we shall take harsher methods of extracting the truth.” [Idealist]
>>
>>4135004
Thanks to the thread run Forgotten. Looking forward for the next one.

>>4135002
(1) Fallavon Law
>“Round them up and get ready to move out. We make for Darbyshire.” You will likely reach the town’s gates in the wee hours of the morning. The Lord of Darbyshire will be grateful to you for removing this threat, surely. [Hearty]

(2) Questioning the bandits.
>“Men of their ilk will say anything to save their own hide. Question the two bandits separately, with the promise of freedom and -without- torture. If their stories and details match up, let them go. The bigger picture is more important.” [Idealist]
>>
>>4135002
>> “Round them up and get ready to move out. We make for Darbyshire.” You will likely reach the town’s gates in the wee hours of the morning. The Lord of Darbyshire will be grateful to you for removi> “That level of knowledge means a deeper involvement. I will not let such men escape punishment. Question them separately. If their stories do not match up, then we shall take harsher methods of extracting the truth.” [Idealist]
ng this threat, surely. [Hearty]
>>
On an unrelated note courting Daubney and reclaiming Ardenne just fits so well on a thematic level.
>>
>>4135002
(1)
>“Round them up and get ready to move out. We make for Darbyshire.” You will likely reach the town’s gates in the wee hours of the morning. The Lord of Darbyshire will be grateful to you for removing this threat, surely. [Hearty]

2
>“Men of their ilk will say anything to save their own hide. Question the two bandits separately, with the promise of freedom and -without- torture. If their stories and details match up, let them go. The bigger picture is more important.” [Idealist]

>>4135004
Thanks for running mate.
>>
>>4135575
I’ve been low key wondering for abit. Where are they drawing upon the bodies to constantly harrass and attack villages.

At this point, the current number of original deadman cannot increase and are limited to bodies they can obtain and since Romaine actively practices cremation, the only way for them to obtain new bodies to feed into grinders would be from sacking and attacking villages.

Unless they’re very infrequent attacks, romaine must be losing villages and peasants at a horrific rate for them to be a constant threat.
>>
>>4135002
(1) Fallavon Law
>“Round them up and get ready to move out. We make for Darbyshire.” You will likely reach the town’s gates in the wee hours of the morning. The Lord of Darbyshire will be grateful to you for removing this threat, surely.

(2) Questioning the bandits.
>“Men of their ilk will say anything to save their own hide. Question the two bandits separately, with the promise of freedom and -without- torture. If their stories and details match up, let them go. The bigger picture is more important.”
>>
>>4135002
>“Round them up and get ready to move out. We make for Darbyshire.” You will likely reach the town’s gates in the wee hours of the morning. The Lord of Darbyshire will be grateful to you for removing this threat, surely. [Hearty]

>“Men of their ilk will say anything to save their own hide. Question the two bandits separately, with the promise of freedom and -without- torture. If their stories and details match up, let them go. The bigger picture is more important.” [Idealist]
>>
>>4135587
Well Ardenne was a kingdom in & off itself that rivaled Canton proper so the starting baseline for the undeads numbers is.... substantial to say the least even accounting for their losses in deadman incursions, outside of Ardenne their is talk of Black sail ships that the langish fear and that Norsikanns that venture over the edge of the world come back......changed

their is also the sinister implications regarding their origins in the pastebin that the reach of the deadmens masters spans the globe and that either the corruption is new to the world of men or covered up by powers beyond the eyes of mortal men.

My bets on a vampire conspiracy and/or some Cthuhulu tier horrors
>>
>>4135625
BCQ cross over? The Necromancer is running the show from behind the scene and a great distance away!? Conspiracies everywhere!
>>
>>4135004
Happy fishing and happy farming. Thanks for running.

>>4135002
(1) Fallavon Law
>“Round them up and get ready to move out. We make for Darbyshire.” You will likely reach the town’s gates in the wee hours of the morning. The Lord of Darbyshire will be grateful to you for removing this threat, surely. [Hearty]

(2) Questioning the bandits.
>“Men of their ilk will say anything to save their own hide. Question the two bandits separately, with the promise of freedom and -without- torture. If their stories and details match up, let them go. The bigger picture is more important.” [Idealist]

Can't even justify this as somehow aiding us in our duty of protecting the pilgrims. This is just torture and torment to get some info with no justice in it. Having them tortured in front of their families would be just as distasteful and unknightly as executing them in front of their families.
>>
>>4135002
Sir Neil dan Marc said that both want assurances that they will be free if they provide details. That means they would be far more inclined to reveal the truth if they received those assurances. There would be no point or benefit for them in not providing the truth if they get assurances. They would be much more resilient to revealing the truth without those assurances even with torture because they won't be let go either way. Either they will lie or provide nothing because there would be no incentive for them in revealing the truth.

>>4135004
Thanks for running Forgotten. See you next time.
>>
>>4135002
(1) Fallavon Law
>“Round them up and get ready to move out. We make for Darbyshire.” You will likely reach the town’s gates in the wee hours of the morning. The Lord of Darbyshire will be grateful to you for removing this threat, surely. [Hearty]

(2) Questioning the bandits.
>“Men of their ilk will say anything to save their own hide. Question the two bandits separately, with the promise of freedom and -without- torture. If their stories and details match up, let them go. The bigger picture is more important.” [Idealist]
>>
>>4125209
Me
>>
>>4115891
>>4114090
These are mine

>>4135002
(1)
>“Round them up and get ready to move out. We make for Darbyshire.” You will likely reach the town’s gates in the wee hours of the morning. The Lord of Darbyshire will be grateful to you for removing this threat, surely. [Hearty]

(2)
>“Men of their ilk will say anything to save their own hide. Question the two bandits separately, with the promise of freedom and -without- torture. If their stories and details match up, let them go. The bigger picture is more important.” [Idealist]
>>
Forgotten what the status of the inheritances of the Duchies and the Crown? we are already know about the marquis of Fallavon and the Crown prince and of at least one princess but what about the other Duchies and the Royal family?
>>
>>4135429
that season got a lot of people assblasted on both ways heh
>>
File: K.jpg (129 KB, 2048x1536)
129 KB
129 KB JPG
Now that this thread's run is over I'm gonna post some images.

First images are knights with plumes.
>>
>>
File: QdfRVII.jpg (97 KB, 736x1034)
97 KB
97 KB JPG
>>
File: KP.jpg (49 KB, 460x406)
49 KB
49 KB JPG
>>
>>4136410
I love this
>>
>>
>>
Images of knights without plumes now.
>>
>>
>>
>>
El Cid
>>
Some Adam and Cain images now.
>>
>>
>>
>>
File: C.jpg (998 KB, 2880x1800)
998 KB
998 KB JPG
>>
>>
File: M.jpg (92 KB, 357x512)
92 KB
92 KB JPG
Sons of Sin images now.
>>
>>
File: george-guo-fgf.jpg (245 KB, 712x1200)
245 KB
245 KB JPG
>>
>>
>>
Gonna post environment images now.
>>
File: henry-wong-98b.jpg (1.32 MB, 1920x2812)
1.32 MB
1.32 MB JPG
>>
>>
File: pablo-carpio-rdr1-1.jpg (304 KB, 1601x756)
304 KB
304 KB JPG
Wasteland/Wastelands
>>
File: pablo-carpio-rdr2-1.jpg (348 KB, 1601x695)
348 KB
348 KB JPG
>>
>>
>>
>>
File: 372uqkdcje241.jpg (336 KB, 1920x2716)
336 KB
336 KB JPG
All I've got is some miscellaneous images remaining.
>>
Female knight
>>
And this is the last image I've got.

>TFW Emile will never have an entire family of knights with Knightfu
>>
File: Enre_EPIC.jpg (72 KB, 600x1029)
72 KB
72 KB JPG
>>4135002
> “Round them up and get ready to move out. We make for Darbyshire.” You will likely reach the town’s gates in the wee hours of the morning. The Lord of Darbyshire will be grateful to you for removing this threat, surely. [Hearty]
Better to wash our hands of this sorry affair.

> “Men of their ilk will say anything to save their own hide. Question the two bandits separately, with the promise of freedom and -without- torture. If their stories and details match up, let them go. The bigger picture is more important.” [Idealist]
Enough bloodshed already, and with the swiftness and brutality we displayed, they either had their lesson or will be killed by the next knight to come by.

>>4135004
Many thanks for running, hope your RL clears up! Greatly looking forward to the next one.
>>
>>4113935
Damn it I just remembered that I didn't vote. I'm dense.

>>4113935
This is me in case the penalties for this thread still apply.

>>4135002
>“Round them up and get ready to move out. We make for Darbyshire.” You will likely reach the town’s gates in the wee hours of the morning. The Lord of Darbyshire will be grateful to you for removing this threat, surely. [Hearty]

>“Men of their ilk will say anything to save their own hide. Question the two bandits separately, with the promise of freedom and -without- torture. If their stories and details match up, let them go. The bigger picture is more important.” [Idealist]

I hope I'm not too late. I was too into posting images that I forgot to vote early so sorry. Hope it counts.
>>
>>4135002
> “Round them up and get ready to move out. We make for Darbyshire.” You will likely reach the town’s gates in the wee hours of the morning. The Lord of Darbyshire will be grateful to you for removing this threat, surely. [Hearty]

> “That level of knowledge means a deeper involvement. I will not let such men escape punishment. Question them separately. If their stories do not match up, then we shall take harsher methods of extracting the truth.” [Idealist]

What will happen to the women and children among them ?
>>
>>4105599
This is me.

>>4135002
1
>“Round them up and get ready to move out. We make for Darbyshire.” You will likely reach the town’s gates in the wee hours of the morning. The Lord of Darbyshire will be grateful to you for removing this threat, surely. [Hearty]

2
>“Men of their ilk will say anything to save their own hide. Question the two bandits separately, with the promise of freedom and -without- torture. If their stories and details match up, let them go. The bigger picture is more important.” [Idealist]

>>4137668
>Wanting to torture captured captive prisoners in front of their families just for some information

Knigga, that's mighty unchivalrous.
>>
>>4135002
> “Round them up and get ready to move out. We make for Darbyshire.” You will likely reach the town’s gates in the wee hours of the morning. The Lord of Darbyshire will be grateful to you for removing this threat, surely. [Hearty]

> “That level of knowledge means a deeper involvement. I will not let such men escape punishment. Question them separately. If their stories do not match up, then we shall take harsher methods of extracting the truth.” [Idealist]
>>
>>4136749
I can post Knight Metal.

The Prohecy - Dream Evil

> https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=me-DijYNdJg

Crusaders Anthem - Dream Evil

> https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=HxYbSbOOn1U

In the Name of God - Powerwolf

> https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=mobtxEJHhY4

Special for the Cainites

Vilified - Stringstorm

> https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=8NfHTzErBiw

For the Sons of Sin

Purging with my Kin

> https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=WyAEBux88hw

For Captain Canton fans

The Shield theme song

> https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=V-MVwW2wulM

It is really hard to find songs about shields.

Last one. I really had to go down a fucking rabbit hole to find this.

Salve Regina - Katholicus

> https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=ri0hIawlyPg

Honestly not that great.

> Special bonus for Joanfags

Adonai - Eths

> https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=B7uLt2wIDwY
>>
File: 1393213229644.jpg (164 KB, 1000x1125)
164 KB
164 KB JPG
>yfw you realise that Adam was basically Kamina with less giant mechs and more knights
>>
>>4137695
No need to interrogate them just in front of their family, just take them somewhere else to do that + The kind of "harsh interrogation methods" I have in mind are more like some slaps/punch in the face rather than skinning the guys alive with a knife and gouge their eyes out.
>>
File: yc534pv.jpg (73 KB, 736x1104)
73 KB
73 KB JPG
Posting more images.
>>
File: 1584237452533.jpg (87 KB, 659x932)
87 KB
87 KB JPG
>>
File: 1584239290315.jpg (91 KB, 564x807)
91 KB
91 KB JPG
>>
File: 79Kdhm9.jpg (162 KB, 752x998)
162 KB
162 KB JPG
>>
File: 9MUM6ZE.png (2.3 MB, 1318x2048)
2.3 MB
2.3 MB PNG
>>
File: 5xucKSh.jpg (257 KB, 734x1300)
257 KB
257 KB JPG
>>
File: JED0pX8.jpg (65 KB, 564x833)
65 KB
65 KB JPG
>>
File: Fkl9CT9.jpg (40 KB, 419x800)
40 KB
40 KB JPG
>>
File: ebgzU7f.jpg (52 KB, 795x545)
52 KB
52 KB JPG
>>
File: taxuyhh5urx21.jpg (90 KB, 600x934)
90 KB
90 KB JPG
>>
File: rZKsjug.jpg (569 KB, 1920x2534)
569 KB
569 KB JPG
>>
File: RJ6Lo0y.jpg (431 KB, 1920x1080)
431 KB
431 KB JPG
>>
File: qR2HEvs.jpg (266 KB, 1200x1500)
266 KB
266 KB JPG
>>
>>4142041
Hey art anon, where do you get your art? Is this stuff you've just collected over time?
>>
File: vOSrJLS.jpg (236 KB, 650x858)
236 KB
236 KB JPG
>>
File: kYXW7oa.jpg (74 KB, 500x739)
74 KB
74 KB JPG
>>4142044
It's stuff I've collected over time from Imgur, Pinterest, and Artstation.
>>
>>4142048
Also you might want to consider that image dumps are against the suptg rules due to the limited bandwidth of the guy who runs it. As cool as your art is, it might cause problems with archiving these threads

>>4142051
Ah k cool, I thought i recognized a couple from artstation
>>
File: kj4siIR.jpg (91 KB, 736x1076)
91 KB
91 KB JPG
>>4142052
Interesting I didn't know that it's against suptg rules. I'll refrain from doing it from now on. This will be the last time I do it.
>>
File: ZxZ7FGx.jpg (74 KB, 464x750)
74 KB
74 KB JPG
>>
>>4142056
Yeah I don't know how strictly it's enforced. I know you can't just do image dump threads (which this obviously isn't, being a quest) but I thought I'd mention it
>>
File: ZFhOSIX.jpg (173 KB, 637x799)
173 KB
173 KB JPG
>>
File: XCrbGkg.jpg (105 KB, 339x672)
105 KB
105 KB JPG
Done. If you're reading this suptg admin., then I'm sorry. I'll halt my image dumping from now on.



Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.