Posting mode: Reply
Password(Password used for file deletion)
  • Supported file types are: GIF, JPG, PNG
  • Maximum file size allowed is 3072 KB.
  • Images greater than 250x250 pixels will be thumbnailed.
  • Read the rules and FAQ before posting.
  • ????????? - ??

  • File : 1314195215.jpg-(21 KB, 211x300, gothrp2201_468x665-211x300.jpg)
    21 KB Anonymous 08/24/11(Wed)10:13 No.16047730  
    >"Do you... Catan?"
    >> Anonymous 08/24/11(Wed)10:15 No.16047748
    >date a normal looking girl
    >visit her birthday
    >looks like I walked right into a goth club

    Wow, just wow man.
    >> Anonymous 08/24/11(Wed)10:15 No.16047753
    Am I supposed to recognize this and/or care?
    >> Anonymous 08/24/11(Wed)10:16 No.16047759
    Thanks to that thread, I will never play Settlers of Catan. Ever.
    >> Anonymous 08/24/11(Wed)10:17 No.16047764
    What the fuck.
    >> Anonymous 08/24/11(Wed)10:17 No.16047766
    Is this in connection with something?
    >> Anonymous 08/24/11(Wed)10:17 No.16047768
    So this is what Goreans look like in real life.
    >> Anonymous 08/24/11(Wed)10:17 No.16047772
         File1314195468.jpg-(93 KB, 500x340, 1300074142371.jpg)
    93 KB
    oh shit op
    >> Anonymous 08/24/11(Wed)10:18 No.16047776
    Can someone explaion this shit?.
    >> Anonymous 08/24/11(Wed)10:18 No.16047778

    Idiotic obviously fake fapfic the other day about an anon who wound up playing settlers of catan with 2 goths ON a goth chick.

    It was pretty silly.
    >> White Knight of /tg/ 08/24/11(Wed)10:19 No.16047786
    rolled 10 = 10

    "Yes, I Catan. And while you are displaying your woman as a board for us to play on, my rage will only grow further. When you lay your hands on her to strangle her, to beat her, and to humiliate her, the Emperors Fury will shine through me. I will then reach my breaking point, and the wings of JUSTICE shall sprout from my shoulder-blades, and I will descend upon you wielding a +3 Iron Shortsword of Holy Fire and smite the evil that is your corrupt soul."

    I roll for initiative.
    >> Anonymous 08/24/11(Wed)10:19 No.16047787

    >Implying gorreans are not morbidly obese
    >> Anonymous 08/24/11(Wed)10:19 No.16047788
    >> Anonymous 08/24/11(Wed)10:19 No.16047790

    ..i've seen some shit guys. Like some seriously fucked up shit during my tours in /tg/ threads. But some of the threads.. we never really came back the same.

    This was one of them man. I'm never, ever playing catan again.
    >> Anonymous 08/24/11(Wed)10:19 No.16047794
    As in, the gameboard on her body?
    That is in equal part arousing and amusing.
    What's everyone whining about?
    >> DM 08/24/11(Wed)10:20 No.16047801

    You lose initiative.

    You get crit'ed for 200 Slashing DMG

    Re-roll character.
    >> Anonymous 08/24/11(Wed)10:21 No.16047807
    A nervous, terrified gamer, a fat vampire-wannabe friend-of-the-gamer's-friend and a skinny, terrifyingly deluded death-worshipping BDSM goth played a game of Settlers of Catan on the BDSM goth's submissive.

    As in, on her body.

    It was a delicious tale.
    >> White Knight of /tg/ 08/24/11(Wed)10:21 No.16047808
    rolled 5 = 5

    What, no saving roll? Shitty ass DM.
    >> Anonymous 08/24/11(Wed)10:22 No.16047811
    because of the way the goth chick was treated. Favourite gems of mine (roughly paraphrased) are

    > the goth guy shouting at the girl, 'HOW DARE YOU PRETEND TO BE HUMAN' when OP refers to chick as a girl or something. Then he takes the girl into a room, shouts at her or something, they both come out crying while he has the most massive boner.

    > playing catan on the chick's belly. The guy pulls down her skirt/short whatever to within a centimetre of her modesty.

    and etc. It was an amusing thread.
    >> Anonymous 08/24/11(Wed)10:22 No.16047814
    Still don't get the big deal. Yeah, he played on top of her. Why is this some kind of devastating revelation?
    Even if for some reason that bothers you, you are whining that somebody somewhere in the world might possibly have done that once?
    >> Anonymous 08/24/11(Wed)10:22 No.16047815

    The poster portrayed it as "this real thing that totally actually happened" and portrayed himself as having a problem with the way she was being treated instead of trying REALLY HARD to win in hopes they'd wind up letting him fuck her.

    Then the thread was rapidly infested with internet white knights.
    >> God-Emperor of Mankind 08/24/11(Wed)10:22 No.16047817
    My question is, where could I find a coat like in Op's picture.
    >> Anonymous 08/24/11(Wed)10:23 No.16047820
         File1314195787.jpg-(32 KB, 233x423, article-1091295-02AA7F9B000005(...).jpg)
    32 KB

    Goreans are small time...Kaotians on the other hand!

    >> Anonymous 08/24/11(Wed)10:23 No.16047825
    mostly this.

    I never knew there were so many white knights on /tg/. A board renowned for being worse than /d/ at times.
    >> Anonymous 08/24/11(Wed)10:24 No.16047827
    The OP was clearly a chick. It fit too completely with their unwillingness to do anything in the situation.
    >> Anonymous 08/24/11(Wed)10:24 No.16047829
    Yeah, again, not seeing the issue.
    Ah. Typical /tg/ overreaction, then. Gotcha.
    >> Anonymous 08/24/11(Wed)10:25 No.16047832
    If you don't live in a third-world shithole, it's pretty simple.
    >> Anonymous 08/24/11(Wed)10:25 No.16047833

    Any number of "goth clothing websites" probably under "goth trenchcoat."

    Knock yourself out.

    They seem to love taking okay looking plain trenchcoats and covering them in faggotry and sparkles.
    >> Anonymous 08/24/11(Wed)10:25 No.16047836

    Damn it, was this archived? I have to read it now.
    >> Anonymous 08/24/11(Wed)10:26 No.16047837
    It's worth reading. The guy came across as the most hilarious douchefag, and the situation was so wonderfully fucked up.
    >> God-Emperor of Mankind 08/24/11(Wed)10:27 No.16047856

    Mostly looking to convert it into a cosplay costume.

    Thanks for the advice tho, I figured as much google-fu as well.
    >> Anonymous 08/24/11(Wed)10:28 No.16047857

    disregard that I suck cocks / answer my own questions


    also is that a synx in OP's image? (not this thread, the thread this thread is talking about)
    >> Anonymous 08/24/11(Wed)10:29 No.16047863
    Then you haven't been here long.
    The amount /tg/ puts women on pedestals is roughly doubly proportionate to its virginity. Why do you think everyone plays WARRIORS OF JUSTICE all the time? Threads of 350 posts have started over the suggestion that women are physically weaker than men. Especially if it is then suggested women make worse soldiers.
    Could have just been a typical /tg/ omega. For all that thread's loudness, the white knights wouldn't have done shit.
    >> Anonymous 08/24/11(Wed)10:29 No.16047870
    What shall we play tonight, Sanguinius?
    >> Anonymous 08/24/11(Wed)10:29 No.16047872
    whhy not directly going for the straightjacket?
    >> God-Emperor of Mankind 08/24/11(Wed)10:30 No.16047874

    I thought all the white knights have died 2 summers ago.
    >> Anonymous 08/24/11(Wed)10:30 No.16047878
    I can almost here his voice. A kind of sniveling, nasal whine.
    >> Anonymous 08/24/11(Wed)10:31 No.16047884
    Who cares about who was in the thread, the story was fantastic.
    >> Anonymous 08/24/11(Wed)10:31 No.16047889
    Hahaha I recognise those faggots. Got kicked off the bus because "No Pets Allowed" and the friver thought they were fucking stupid.
    >> Anonymous 08/24/11(Wed)10:32 No.16047898
    how wrong you are
    how so very wrong
    >> God-Emperor of Mankind 08/24/11(Wed)10:32 No.16047899

    Because the Hauptsturmführer from Hellsing does not wear a straight jacket.
    >> Anonymous 08/24/11(Wed)10:33 No.16047904
    No, they just have become more muted.
    I remember a time when the words "-4 STR" unleashed an avalanche off butthurt and then a dump of muscular women (because /tg/ had and I suppose still has a rather obvious fantasy to be railed in the ass by one).
    >> Anonymous 08/24/11(Wed)10:33 No.16047907
    I hate Plutoun from the pretension in the first 3 posts alone, he knows nothing of Descartes.
    >> God-Emperor of Mankind 08/24/11(Wed)10:33 No.16047908

    I certainly haven't seen any since then. Probably because of the time frame. Since I am from Europe.
    >> Anonymous 08/24/11(Wed)10:35 No.16047915
    well, your nose/mouth do fit.
    >> God-Emperor of Mankind 08/24/11(Wed)10:35 No.16047921

    Raging over a game mechanic.

    I doubt any self respecting fa/tg/irl would be enraged by this, UNLESS SHE IS A FUCKING FEMINIST.
    >> Anonymous 08/24/11(Wed)10:36 No.16047924
    just popping ITT to say, yes, yes we still do.
    >> Anonymous 08/24/11(Wed)10:36 No.16047925
    Oh, no no no.
    Why do you think everyone is always so colon crushed and rectally ravished over Technomancer?
    Because he's French.
    But also because he's loudly contemptuous of chicks.
    >> Anonymous 08/24/11(Wed)10:36 No.16047929
    >The man who called himself Plouton stood up, and extended a hand covered in rings and bracelets. "Mesmerizing," He said, and I took that as a form of greeting. I shook his hand, and his eyes widened the moment our flesh made contact, as if I had stung him. He held onto my hand though, and after an extremely uncomfortable four seconds, he said "You have a monumentous aura. I like you."

    >Sanguinatus, whom I mistakenly had thought was named Thomas

    I can't tell if this is going to burn my soul or make me wish that it had happened to me. This is exciting.
    >> God-Emperor of Mankind 08/24/11(Wed)10:37 No.16047931

    It's not for me.

    If Id cosplay, I think id try out Schrödinger, or Seras. But I lack the massive boobage.
    >> Anonymous 08/24/11(Wed)10:37 No.16047933
    so, you've completely missed out on the SoB shitstorms or what?

    we've had a lot of other controversial threads about women, too.

    for someone who lurks as much as you do, it's a wonder you didn't stumble upon them this year.
    >> Anonymous 08/24/11(Wed)10:37 No.16047936
    Your one to talk, where's your namefriends?

    You usually have a couple with you, every time you post on this board.
    >> Ragnasal !!69YZM9mjEHH 08/24/11(Wed)10:37 No.16047937
    It gets worse/better.
    >> Anonymous 08/24/11(Wed)10:38 No.16047939
    No one's butthurt over Technomancer, we just don't like him. He's an idiot.
    >> Anonymous 08/24/11(Wed)10:38 No.16047942


    I mean, I like BDSM and humiliation as much as the next pervert, but at least I don't despise all women ever for no adequately explained reason.
    >> Anonymous 08/24/11(Wed)10:38 No.16047946
    >colon crushed and rectally ravished

    i lol'd
    >> Anonymous 08/24/11(Wed)10:38 No.16047948
    not only the tits, frankly...

    but animu characters are so idealized it's damn hard to fit them, to speak the truth.
    >> Anonymous 08/24/11(Wed)10:38 No.16047949
    There's more than one GEoM, remember. One's some Eastern European chick, one's an American racist/sexist guy.
    >> Anonymous 08/24/11(Wed)10:39 No.16047953
    We once played M:tG on our (female) friend's back. She was dressed though. Can I still join the club?
    >> Anonymous 08/24/11(Wed)10:39 No.16047960
         File1314196782.jpg-(43 KB, 366x380, jesusfuck.jpg)
    43 KB
    >self respecting fa/tg/irl
    >like RAWK LAWBSTAR, DLFG, and Exalted
    A contradiction in terms if there ever was one.
    Again, not surprised.
    >> Anonymous 08/24/11(Wed)10:39 No.16047961
    I know, and the Eastern European Chick one usually has a crew of name and tripfags that post with her.
    >> Anonymous 08/24/11(Wed)10:39 No.16047962
    Try gluing bowls to your tits.
    >> God-Emperor of Mankind 08/24/11(Wed)10:40 No.16047964

    Technomancer is a friend of mine, and despite his odd "preferences" I do not label him monster or whatever.

    I just game, drawn , and have fun.

    But please do tell what exactly do you mean by "colon crushed and rectally ravished" . The terms are amusing.
    >> Anonymous 08/24/11(Wed)10:40 No.16047967
    no, she has to be partially undressed, wearing a collar, horribly mistreated and despite all that, turned on at having people play a tcg on her stomach.
    >> Anonymous 08/24/11(Wed)10:41 No.16047978
    How can you consider someone who considers you subhuman a friend? Seriously, how does that work? How is that "self respect"?
    >> Anonymous 08/24/11(Wed)10:41 No.16047982
         File1314196904.jpg-(12 KB, 300x300, Zeromancer - Eurotrash.jpg)
    12 KB

    I think I'm going to put on a Zeromancer album. I think that will set the proper ambience.

    Pic related: it has "Need You Like A Drug" and a cover of "Send Me An Angel" on it.
    >> Anonymous 08/24/11(Wed)10:41 No.16047984
    Sound like an interesting fellow.
    Like Technomancer, who I would like were he not French because he gets all the neckbeards so fucking ANGRY.
    >> God-Emperor of Mankind 08/24/11(Wed)10:42 No.16047991

    Theres only Overlord and Technomancer, if rarely. I can account for. Scriptarius ever so when he's bored or not crafting glorious miniatures.

    Theres THAT GUY with a trip. And DLFG sometimes. EXTREMELY sometimes.

    I don't know who else you might be referring, care to name a few?
    >> Anonymous 08/24/11(Wed)10:42 No.16047993
    Yes, because you have to be a neckbeard to dislike someone for extreme sexism. Absolutely.
    >> Anonymous 08/24/11(Wed)10:43 No.16047997
    nvm then...
    >> God-Emperor of Mankind 08/24/11(Wed)10:44 No.16048007

    I don't really care what he thinks of me. Even you, are my friend, as anonymous, unless you blatantly go "I HATE YOU".
    >> Ragnasal !!69YZM9mjEHH 08/24/11(Wed)10:44 No.16048012
    Being on topic: I find it funny how nobody in the original thread pointed out that the chick actually enjoyed the abuse. She was obviously getting turned on towards the end of it.

    Off Topic: There are plenty of tripfags in /tg/. Myself included. I don't support any of them, nor do I affiliate myself to any of them.
    I just write shit.
    >> Anonymous 08/24/11(Wed)10:45 No.16048017
    That doesn't answer my question. How (or better, why) do you consider him a friend?
    >> Anonymous 08/24/11(Wed)10:45 No.16048018
    Praetor Lillifag.
    Warp Infused Grey Knight
    >> Anonymous 08/24/11(Wed)10:46 No.16048024
         File1314197171.jpg-(52 KB, 636x709, tg-canon DLFG.jpg)
    52 KB


    I am in favor of DLFG being a /tg/ canon character for Tyranid Rule 34 purposes / amusing comic strips about awkward interactions with Cultist-Chan. Any resemblance to the actual DLFG that is more than superficial would be coincidence.

    Just because it would be funny.
    >> Anonymous 08/24/11(Wed)10:46 No.16048025
    nah at least a few anons had pointed that out and I think OP him/herself had pointed out he/she was reluctant to intervene because he/she didn't know the situation behind it.
    >> Anonymous 08/24/11(Wed)10:46 No.16048029
    I know, but for some unexplained reason, when a trip or namefag posts, other trip and namefags follow suite.
    >> Anonymous 08/24/11(Wed)10:46 No.16048030
    No, in this case it's just secondary to it.
    Speaking as one of similar outlook, I don't greet all women with "GREETINGS, SLUTWHORE".
    Butthurt. Duh. They're also anally apocalypsed, ass anguished, and colon crucified.
    You've an issue with some chick enjoying being submissive?
    >> Anonymous 08/24/11(Wed)10:47 No.16048034
    like, a nidcultist stalking the DeathLeaper?

    and here we go again with the nid shipping...
    >> God-Emperor of Mankind 08/24/11(Wed)10:47 No.16048036

    Because he offers me artistical critique.

    That may not be a straightforward answer for you. So I can't really say to be honest. Why don't you tell me everything about him.
    >> Anonymous 08/24/11(Wed)10:48 No.16048039
    read me wrong bro

    I was more than a bit intrigued by the story. And if women want to do what the girl did in that thread, then all the more power to them.
    >> Anonymous 08/24/11(Wed)10:49 No.16048043
    But you automatically think of all women as lesser and more than that, in need of degradation. That turns you on. How do you reconcile that? What's your justification? What do you think of female friends?
    >> Anonymous 08/24/11(Wed)10:49 No.16048047
    Circlejerking is integral to being one.
    She's also an irritating attention whore.
    Because not everyone gets so intestinally imploded over it, unlike you.
    >> Anonymous 08/24/11(Wed)10:50 No.16048051
    >implying I can't separate reality from fantasy

    it's funny but some people are capable of doing that
    >> Anonymous 08/24/11(Wed)10:50 No.16048059
    I've done this, but minus the abuse.
    It's about as special as telling girls to try and touch their elbows together.
    >> Anonymous 08/24/11(Wed)10:50 No.16048060
         File1314197432.jpg-(78 KB, 365x337, Rip.jpg)
    78 KB
    oh, the similarity ...
    >> God-Emperor of Mankind 08/24/11(Wed)10:51 No.16048069
         File1314197480.png-(125 KB, 1197x1021, Epic.png)
    125 KB

    Oh wow, forgot about the fanatics that shouted awesome 40k quotes!

    With all this arguing going on here all we are missing is a Sergal. But as always. Stay Frosty people.
    >> Anonymous 08/24/11(Wed)10:51 No.16048072
    >female friends
    Oh, fuck. If I want friends, I'm not going to go to a woman.
    My justification is it's true.
    >> Anonymous 08/24/11(Wed)10:52 No.16048075
    Uh, no. That's an important part of why Technomancer's such a fuckup. Those aren't just fantasies for him. He genuinely considers women as subhuman. He thinks it's insane to be in a normal (or equal) relationship with a women. If you're of "a similar mindset" then you presumably have desires and opinions outwith the fantasy, too.
    >> Anonymous 08/24/11(Wed)10:52 No.16048082
    Uh-huh. There we go.
    >> Anonymous 08/24/11(Wed)10:53 No.16048087
    Wrong guy.
    I agree, to be honest. Notions of equality are just idiotic.
    >> Anonymous 08/24/11(Wed)10:53 No.16048089
         File1314197620.jpg-(34 KB, 472x344, 1314111176577.jpg)
    34 KB
    oh shit DLFG what are you doing

    i'm not the best of drawfags but that thread easily contains three, four scenes I'd love to draw out.
    >> God-Emperor of Mankind 08/24/11(Wed)10:53 No.16048092

    So what you are saying is that his Art basically represents his fantasies and shards of personality? Desires even? Fancy that.
    >> Anonymous 08/24/11(Wed)10:54 No.16048093
    So, uh... tell me about your mother.
    >> Anonymous 08/24/11(Wed)10:55 No.16048104
    The difference between your mental image of me and reality is that I don't have to treat women as equals, and still they won't realize it.
    If I want friends, I have them.
    If I want a fuck, I'll go to a woman.
    >> Anonymous 08/24/11(Wed)10:55 No.16048106
    AFAIK she only talked about those things because people asked. That's not "attention whoring" by any means...
    >> Anonymous 08/24/11(Wed)10:55 No.16048108
    I don't dislike Technomancer for his art, or for his fetishes. I dislike him because he holds a worldview that is the antithesis of my actual existence.
    >> Anonymous 08/24/11(Wed)10:56 No.16048116
    I didn't say anything about a mental image of you. I was expecting a response along those lines sooner or later and, "there we go", it came sooner.
    >> Anonymous 08/24/11(Wed)10:57 No.16048127
    Just checking, but are you the angry Canadian who wants to put women in cages?
    >> Ragnasal !!69YZM9mjEHH 08/24/11(Wed)10:57 No.16048128
    ... I was wondering when you'd show up.
    >> Anonymous 08/24/11(Wed)10:58 No.16048133
    A woman who is inferior. Is this going somewhere?
    Your existence being what, to serve women? I don't get it.
    >> Anonymous 08/24/11(Wed)10:58 No.16048136
    >that I don't have to treat women as equals, and still they won't realize it.
    Actually, you don't have to treat _people_ (any or even all people) as equals and they still won't realise it if you are smart enough about it...
    >> Anonymous 08/24/11(Wed)10:58 No.16048137
    >"Also I declared myself as male when I posted a few crappy stories, which is against the rules, and I'd rather not get banned."
    >> Anonymous 08/24/11(Wed)10:58 No.16048139
    The appearance of the Sergal is a sign that a thread has gone to shit. It's like he shows up just to draw the mod's attention to it.
    >> Anonymous 08/24/11(Wed)10:59 No.16048147
    About OP´s picture.

    A goth couple, with the girl in a submissive role try to catch the bus.

    Bus driver kicks them out because the dude is being misogynic.

    Goths start making a goth stampede because...
    >> Alpharius 08/24/11(Wed)11:00 No.16048151
    I find your methodology flawed and counterproductive; this thread is bad enough that nothing you do can make it measurably worse. At least have the decency to sage so that your posts don't bump the thread up to the foreground. Let it die, rather than prolong its agony as you so cruelly and frequently do. Or else, I suppose, drop the pretense that you're helping.
    >> Anonymous 08/24/11(Wed)11:00 No.16048155
    I remember them.
    I know. Condescension is an odd thing, few recognize it.
    Got it in one. And I'm not exactly angry.
    In fact, I rarely lose my temper.
    >> Anonymous 08/24/11(Wed)11:00 No.16048159
    >the anti hero /tg/ needs but doesn't deserve

    or maybe it's a very complex PSYOPS campaign by mods to delete threads they want gone without making it look like unnecessary mod intervention in /tg/. Add a sergal, take one excuse for deleting/locking thread out.
    >> Anonymous 08/24/11(Wed)11:00 No.16048161
    So we'll hunt him because he can take it. Because he's not our hero. He's an outspoken guardian, a watchful protector. A Sergal Fag.
    >> God-Emperor of Mankind 08/24/11(Wed)11:01 No.16048167

    >Report submitted! This window will close in 5 seconds...

    Its pretty easy really.
    >> Anonymous 08/24/11(Wed)11:01 No.16048168
    So what's your plan for women then, Anon? And how *was* your relationship with your mother?
    >> Anonymous 08/24/11(Wed)11:02 No.16048174
    not subtly patronizing enough
    >> Anonymous 08/24/11(Wed)11:02 No.16048179

    >She's also an irritating attention whore.
    >implying that's not part of why it would be funny.

    also she does have the best image dumps ever.

    Anyway, it would have made the story better if the Unsettled Settler of Catan, after a few instances of abuse, stood, drew a flintlock pistol, aimed it at Plouton and said, "STAND AND DELIVER!"

    (Optional Bullet-Time fight scene set to "Take The Day!" by Turisas: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HpzhnIV7_Os )
    >> Ragnasal !!69YZM9mjEHH 08/24/11(Wed)11:02 No.16048180
    In b4 Incest.
    >> Anonymous 08/24/11(Wed)11:02 No.16048186
    That's not really the point of contention. The main limiter on your ability to treat other people badly is the justice system, which tends to try and accord people the maximum compatible rights they are allowed (whether proficiently or not, that's your opinion). So of course, you can be NASTY to people, but to treat them very badly is typically criminal.
    >> Anonymous 08/24/11(Wed)11:02 No.16048188
         File1314198179.jpg-(71 KB, 750x600, readthedamnmanualfirst.jpg)
    71 KB
    >horribly mistreated
    Argh...it's only mis-treatment if it's not voluntary. Considering she was apparently leaking like a british sink the whole time (or so I got from the story) I'd say it was just a really poorly negotiated attempt to involve a 3rd party into a play.
    >> Anonymous 08/24/11(Wed)11:03 No.16048197
    And that's exactly why we have our sub/dom playtime during weekends when no one's around.

    Yeah, it's a free country, but you don't have to rub your kinks and quirks into everyones face.
    >> Anonymous 08/24/11(Wed)11:04 No.16048198
    >implying I don't like shota
    >implying I don't like the occasional big black dick

    seriously sergal, the abomination that you are, I thought you'd have wider tastes. Obviously I was wrong.
    >> Anonymous 08/24/11(Wed)11:04 No.16048204
    You seem to know a lot

    please go on..
    >> Anonymous 08/24/11(Wed)11:05 No.16048213
    As a misogynist, I must say that isn't even necessarily misogynism.
    If my "plan" you mean "were it up to you", it's simple.
    Women should assume the servile position they are naturally accustomed to, and be recognized as property. Simple. I don't hate them, after all.
    And my mother raised me herself along with my sister. Our relationship is fine to this date. She's of an overprotective bent, however.
    >> God-Emperor of Mankind 08/24/11(Wed)11:05 No.16048214

    While we wait for a Mod, we can still be civil, I've asked you a question last time, you vaguely answered. Whats your take on Technomancer. In your lavishly detail if you please. Maybe you could actually stay on topic this time.
    >> Anonymous 08/24/11(Wed)11:06 No.16048221
    >> Anonymous 08/24/11(Wed)11:07 No.16048230
    It's /the/ Technomancer, please.
    >> Anonymous 08/24/11(Wed)11:07 No.16048231
    >Women should assume the servile position they are naturally accustomed to, and be recognized as property. Simple. I don't hate them, after all.
    Ha. Of course. You just... consider them property, right? So slaves, that's the word for human property.
    >And my mother raised me herself along with my sister. Our relationship is fine to this date. She's of an overprotective bent, however.
    Does she know of your attitudes? Does your sister? How was your childhood? Have you ever had an uncomfortable period with either mother or sister?

    What about your father? What's he like?
    >> God-Emperor of Mankind 08/24/11(Wed)11:09 No.16048248

    My mistake, sorry about that.


    God damn it Sigmund!
    >> Anonymous 08/24/11(Wed)11:11 No.16048260
    She's a rather strong traditionalist who I've no doubt would've been a happy housewife if my father hadn't left when I was six.
    My sister's an unrepentant slut and I have made that clear. She got molested when she was younger. Whatever.
    My childhood was shitty and riddled with poverty. My mother was never emotionally stable, but she dealt with it. Mostly by getting fat. You can fill in the blanks there.
    Not that I can think of. Define "uncomfortable".
    >> Anonymous 08/24/11(Wed)11:12 No.16048270
    Just stop it. There is nothing you can do to convince these retards that they are wrong. Just let them fester in their own bigoted bile.
    >> Anonymous 08/24/11(Wed)11:12 No.16048271
    >Causing or feeling unease or awkwardness
    >> Anonymous 08/24/11(Wed)11:13 No.16048282
    You are so fucked up you don't even know how fucked up you are.

    Lemme guess, your sister isn't married to her boyfriend, therefore slut.
    >> Anonymous 08/24/11(Wed)11:13 No.16048283
         File1314198820.jpg-(136 KB, 1280x1024, do you catan 01.jpg)
    136 KB
    >first vampire lord with a slave girl I found on google images. whatever.
    >> Anonymous 08/24/11(Wed)11:14 No.16048291
    It's not like the physical form fucking matters in this day and age unless you are in a third world nation.
    >> Anonymous 08/24/11(Wed)11:15 No.16048293
    >see this thread
    >remember sanguinatus
    >> Anonymous 08/24/11(Wed)11:15 No.16048296
         File1314198926.jpg-(56 KB, 450x611, self_portrait_laughing_hiRicha(...).jpg)
    56 KB
    Are you making this up to fit with what you think my prediction would be?
    >> Anonymous 08/24/11(Wed)11:15 No.16048303
    No, I mean she went through eleven "boyfriends" in a year.
    My opinion being different must sting.
    Do you see me complaining that you people consider them equals?
    >> Ragnasal !!69YZM9mjEHH 08/24/11(Wed)11:16 No.16048308
         File1314198963.gif-(1.74 MB, 350x143, abandonthreadp1.gif)
    1.74 MB
    >> Anonymous 08/24/11(Wed)11:16 No.16048310
    It's fucking perfect. All we need now is a fucking recording.

    Fuck. We should write fucking fanfiction.
    >> Anonymous 08/24/11(Wed)11:17 No.16048319
    What, that I was raised to think this way?
    Or that my sister shaped it?
    No, I actually came to it myself. I thought of them as equals until I grew up.
    >> Anonymous 08/24/11(Wed)11:18 No.16048333

    The OP of the thread must be a graduate student or a new professor at Miskatonic University.
    >> Anonymous 08/24/11(Wed)11:18 No.16048336
    No, uh... my prediction of your background. I just thought you might be trying to guess at it. It's fine. Can you answer the uncomfortable part now, or would you prefer not to?

    This definition will do: >>16048271
    >> Anonymous 08/24/11(Wed)11:19 No.16048342
    You have issues man. You have fucking issues.

    If you ever touch psychoactive stuff, your problems will surface SO FUCKING HARD, that you'll be in an institution for the rest of your life.
    >> Anonymous 08/24/11(Wed)11:20 No.16048349
    >No, I mean she went through eleven "boyfriends" in a year.
    That's just being a bit promiscuous. Sluthood starts when they get into tiple digits (of partners).
    Besides, calling someone unrepentant after just a year is kinda harsh.
    >> Anonymous 08/24/11(Wed)11:20 No.16048352
    Unease? Like what, a sexual experience?
    I walked in on my sister fucking her boyfriend.
    I remember hearing her doing that, also.
    Can't think of anything else.
    >> Anonymous 08/24/11(Wed)11:21 No.16048356
         File1314199275.jpg-(34 KB, 420x319, cleaveandsmite.jpg)
    34 KB
    > the goth guy shouting at the girl, 'HOW DARE YOU PRETEND TO BE HUMAN' when OP refers to chick as a girl or something
    >> Anonymous 08/24/11(Wed)11:21 No.16048360
         File1314199305.png-(126 KB, 1250x1250, 1314199144804.png)
    126 KB
    >> Anonymous 08/24/11(Wed)11:21 No.16048361
    That was BEFORE she went to college, I thank you.
    Well then I suppose it's good I never have.
    >> Anonymous 08/24/11(Wed)11:22 No.16048366

    Needs more rings.
    >> Anonymous 08/24/11(Wed)11:23 No.16048372
         File1314199394.jpg-(35 KB, 400x474, psychoactive.jpg)
    35 KB
    Sadly I've never been in a campaign where I found, or could afford to get some psychoactive skin.
    >> Anonymous 08/24/11(Wed)11:23 No.16048373
    No, not necessarily anything sexual. Just plain distress, over some part of your relationship with a family member or over their actions. What about extended family? Grandparents? Aunts and uncles? Cousins? How did you get along with them?
    >> Anonymous 08/24/11(Wed)11:23 No.16048374
    And in reality, you'd just be angered and not say a thing.
    >> Anonymous 08/24/11(Wed)11:24 No.16048384
    >That was BEFORE she went to college, I thank you.
    Indeed, highschool is a joyful time, at least for some of us. You are welcome.
    >> Anonymous 08/24/11(Wed)11:26 No.16048404
    Go to your local trustworthy dealer and buy some mushrooms or LSD, or mescaline.

    >> Ragnasal !!69YZM9mjEHH 08/24/11(Wed)11:29 No.16048435
    It's threads like these that make me realize that having the goal to beat Norways High Score isn't detrimental to society. It only fucking improves it.

    Maybe Hitler and Russia was onto something when it came to genocide.
    >> Anonymous 08/24/11(Wed)11:30 No.16048449
         File1314199817.png-(215 KB, 1250x1250, 5soso.png)
    215 KB
    To me highschool was rather dull and boring.

    Spending my days grinding on Korean MMORPGs, because all my friends and school chums did it. Playing chess in the chess club, buying and selling fake virtual stocks in the stock market club. Going though my anime weeaboo phase ingloriously, as I face a existential crisis, as I was confused and a little overwhelmed by the insurmountable life, scholar and career choices I had to make at the end.
    >> Anonymous 08/24/11(Wed)11:30 No.16048455
    >Can someone explaion this shit?.
    These people went to prison for reminding the public that ugly people have kinky sex too.

    I fully support this.
    >> Anonymous 08/24/11(Wed)11:31 No.16048461
    Don't you mean Reagan was onto something?

    If it wasn't for the Russians who kept saying "Let's not start a war," we'd all be living in post-apocalyptic Wastelandia.
    >> Anonymous 08/24/11(Wed)11:31 No.16048468
    I did LSD once.
    It was 2 hours of sheer mind-shattering psychological horror movie.

    I wouldn't do it again though. Years later, the memory of the horrors sticks with me clear as day, but the goodness that followed has dimmed to distant, fuzzy half-memory.
    >> Anonymous 08/24/11(Wed)11:32 No.16048469
    North Gorea is BEST Gorea!
    >> Anonymous 08/24/11(Wed)11:33 No.16048483
         File1314199981.jpg-(76 KB, 683x476, do you catan 02.jpg)
    76 KB
    The day will come when a FFG supplement contains a narrative blurb in which an Inquisitor is questioning a Heretic and asks, "Do you... Catan?"
    >> Anonymous 08/24/11(Wed)11:33 No.16048489
    LSD is for when you're so bored that anything is better than being bored.
    >> Anonymous 08/24/11(Wed)11:34 No.16048493
    My sister being a self-absorbed cunt? Still is, only ever went after men she could suck dry in every sense of the word.
    My mother being overprotective? I chafed at that, but I was the supposedly comparatively good child so I suppose it was to be expected.
    My entire extended maternal family but one who never associated with us lived either in Britain (my mother's homeland) or in Dominica (her parents' homeland).
    I dunno, I just thought it to be funny when my grandfather died and left all his sizable amount of money to some slut I assume he was fucking.
    Lessee... my family in Britain is an insane clusterfuck of convicts and fuckups of all description. My sister fucked my cousin while she was there. My paternal family I was always estranged from ever since the whole trials over my paternal grandfather molesting my sister.
    My father ran off to I think Thailand so as not to pay child support, married some gook. And my mother used to find any reason at all to beat us and then laugh about it to her friends until around middle school, but I never held it against her, she was all kinds of fucked up at that point. I love my mother. That doesn't mean I think she's equal.
    I formed my opinions around simply watching all the women I met and comparing them to the men.
    My close family is just two of them.
    >> Anonymous 08/24/11(Wed)11:34 No.16048494
    That is the day I will start playing Dark Heresy.

    By the way, who else saw FFG have got the Star Wars license? They're making some shit with it just now, but an RPG must be down the line somewhere.
    >> Ragnasal !!69YZM9mjEHH 08/24/11(Wed)11:34 No.16048495
    Meh. With nukes, there'd be a chance that my self-absorbed self wouldn't be here. I'd rather just bomb fucking everything and make the world my own post-apocalypse.
    >> Anonymous 08/24/11(Wed)11:35 No.16048501
    None of them ever bothered with killing goths or neckbeards.
    >> Anonymous 08/24/11(Wed)11:35 No.16048508
    Alright. Thanks for asking some questions. I don't know what your attitude is to your upbringing, but I feel sorry that it was occasionally difficult for you. I hope things are better now.
    >> Anonymous 08/24/11(Wed)11:36 No.16048511
    She wasn't in high school, but kind of bummed around at home until she was 20.
    That's when all the real sluttiness including incest on her part happened.
    >> Anonymous 08/24/11(Wed)11:39 No.16048530
         File1314200355.jpg-(58 KB, 600x570, do you catan 03.jpg)
    58 KB

    yeah, they've made vague references to an RPG but right now they're doing something similar to the Space Hulk card game and a miniatures game where you dogfight with X-Wings and TIE Fighters and such.

    hopefully the eventual RPG will be compatible enough with the Dark Heresy/Rogue Trader/Deathwatch/Black Crusade to settle some of those "WHO WOULD WIN IN A FIGHT? DARTH VADER OR A GREY KNIGHT?" arguments. (>implying it would actually settle them)

    also, this is probably more appropriate than Tzeeentch.
    >> Anonymous 08/24/11(Wed)11:39 No.16048536

    See, what you want is this guy to say "WAAAHHH !! Some mean girl/woman HURTED MEEEEE !!!!!" Then you can dismiss his views as irrational, reactive. You can handle the idea that someone could disagree with you in matters of gender politics honestly. Since you probably are also a big fan of victim culture, your natural assumption is that he only feels that way because he was hurt or made to feel powerless. If you are male, you probably think this because you are made to feel powerless by women, and assume that all men share this feeling. The truth is, far from being egalitarian, you consider men to be inferior, after all, that absolves you of responsibility for your own powerlessness. You are so invested in this defense mechanism, that when anyone challenges it, you become obsessed with discrediting their viewpoint, thinking that yours is so obviously correct that no one could disagree, at least not honestly. However, one can come to a different than you have, not only honestly but I would argue inevitably, in the matter of differences between the genders.
    >> Ragnasal !!69YZM9mjEHH 08/24/11(Wed)11:39 No.16048540
    Have you ever just sat down and tried to talk to her about it? Like, knife-in-hand, hover over her while she sleeps with a gag over her mouth? Sounds like you got issues similar to myself, 'cept mine revolve around other men.

    Scare the fucking shit out of her. Like, make her fear for her life. Press a fucking blade to her throat, and let her feel her pulse against the edge. Talk to her calmly, and then simply tell her how you feel about her being a slut.

    Sure, you might spend a few years in the slammer, but I know you'll mortify her. Don't forget to mention that deep down you love her, and only want her to change.
    >> Anonymous 08/24/11(Wed)11:40 No.16048543
    So you need to do it again to refresh it.
    >> Anonymous 08/24/11(Wed)11:40 No.16048544
    4 hours is way too short for LSD.
    That's more like 8-12 hours.
    Psilocybin or 5-MeO-DMT could have similar effects and be over after 4 hours, though, as well as some 2C compounds.


    If i was that bored, taking LSD would be about the worst idea. Shitty set to take psychedelics.
    LSD is for going inna woods and melting into the foliage, or improvising 3 hour songs when you start to come down.
    >> Anonymous 08/24/11(Wed)11:40 No.16048547
    Hate you mother, you have a good reason too.
    But hate your goverment even more for not having looked at the insane reports of your family.
    >> Anonymous 08/24/11(Wed)11:40 No.16048548
    4 hour trip on LSD?

    Impossible. LSD works on unreceptive people for 8 hours and on receptive people for 12 (!) hours.

    It's more likely that you got a psychedelic amphetamine, or a psychedelic reseach chemical. These function in similar ways as LSD, but of course there are changes in tripping time, as well as increased discomfort (LSD is pretty much one of the safest drugs in the world, surpassing caffeine).
    There's word on the street that these "LSD" replacers have a greater tendency for bad trips than LSD itself, because the drugs aren't as smooth in your system as LSD.

    Anyway, be happy you haven't done a big dose of salvia.

    I was trapped, utterly trapped in this colour for endless aeons, I forgot everything. My name, my location, whatever I knew about the world around me. (Meanwhile in the real world, only two minutes pass during which I fall over my girlfriend, and walk into a mirror, cutting my face open.

    Daaaaamn, I never felt so afraid in my life. It easily beats an armed robbery I witnessed up close. But DAMN, in hindsight, it was an awesome experience I didn't want to miss.

    Will take a few years before I smoke salvia again. Fucking hell, madness on a stick.

    Salvia truly is a gateway into the courtyard of Azathoth, the Blind Idiot-God amids the nuclear chaos.
    >> Anonymous 08/24/11(Wed)11:41 No.16048555

    There also needs to be a comic strip version in which Deathleaper is Plouton, DLFG is Slave Girl, Cultist-Chan is Sanguinatus, and OP is [I wish /tg/ had spoilers]Grendel[/I wish /tg/ had spoilers].
    >> Anonymous 08/24/11(Wed)11:41 No.16048557
    Attitude? Indifferent.
    Wish I wasn't so weak around then. Might've improved some things.
    School was a hard place for me, given I was smart.
    Home was a rock.
    Suicide wasn't ever really off my mind, but believe it or not, often it was more boredom than despair that did it.

    No real big.
    >> Anonymous 08/24/11(Wed)11:42 No.16048558
    I was just curious about his upbringing, really. And his family relationships. I certainly don't absolve him of any of the blame I accord to him for his viewpoint, just because he had it tough at times. Additionally, I'm fully aware that someone could disagree with me on manifold grounds. Thanks for sharing your opinion though.
    >> God-Emperor of Mankind 08/24/11(Wed)11:42 No.16048560
    My dog crept up to my chair and I yelled out in a Homer Simpson style "Gaaah!"

    For one split second I swear I saw a Sergal.

    I've had a misogynist classmate back in artschool, he was roughly the same as the one getting psycho analized right now. Except he had a VERY racial hatred towards african americans. Up to the point he considered Gladiatorial arena's for death penalty inmates.


    I don't know if you blatantly posted this to derail the thread, or contribute to it in your vision, but if what you say is true, I generally feel sorry about you.

    Highschool was great for me.
    >> Anonymous 08/24/11(Wed)11:43 No.16048572
    I'll say this to you: you are almost textbook, and there would be psychological help for you if you ever believed in or pursued it. Of course, I know that you won't and that you would regard that as monumentally stupid.
    >> Anonymous 08/24/11(Wed)11:45 No.16048581
    Possibly my favorite one yet.
    >> Anonymous 08/24/11(Wed)11:45 No.16048584
         File1314200741.jpg-(60 KB, 408x408, retarded people.jpg)
    60 KB
    >"Do you... Catan?"
    >A Synx shows up (no idea if it Catans or not)
    >Psychoanalyzing abused people
    >Thread turns into 420chan

    never change, /tg/. never change.
    >> Anonymous 08/24/11(Wed)11:46 No.16048588
    "Psychedelic amphetamine" is a pretty vague term.
    I've seen mescaline derivatives such as 2C-B or 2C-C been classified as amphetamines (an they do last shorter than acid), but also stuff like DOI or DOM.
    For the latter, a 12 hour trip would be extremely short.
    That shit can last for 3 days if you take a high dose, although 18-24 hours is much more likely.
    >> Anonymous 08/24/11(Wed)11:46 No.16048596

    Sounds like you smoked an extract. Plain leaf salvia is much, much milder. Great for meditation, or just chilling by a campfire (assuming you have nonsmokers keeping an eye on you....) Still not a party drug, though.
    >> Anonymous 08/24/11(Wed)11:47 No.16048602
    See, here's the part here the misogyny comes in.
    Fuck it and fuck her. If she wants to be a manipulative slut that SPECIFICALLY CHOOSES SPINELESS MEN SHE CAN CONTROL (direct paraphrase of something she said), she can fuck every man in the world for all I care.
    I don't expect you to. It's comforting believing women to be people.
    >> Anonymous 08/24/11(Wed)11:48 No.16048611
         File1314200911.png-(34 KB, 350x350, 5eatingcutebold.png)
    34 KB
    No need for your sympathies, my drawfriend.

    I have grown accustomed to my mediocrity and mundanity. And it is where I find fortitude, surrounded by people who strife to be bigger then life. However falling abysmally short in aptitude and attitude.
    >> Anonymous 08/24/11(Wed)11:48 No.16048612
    Anybody with a brain will look at psycologi as the pile of things it is.
    It is a wonderful tool, but only if you actually have something that needs treatment.
    I doubt misgynism is anything that can be cured without indoctrination, and I doubt he will find a psycolog that will attempt to help him understand his own view a bit better and yet cure the "baw part".

    What I find disgusting is you people who attempt to jump him merely for his belief.
    >> Anonymous 08/24/11(Wed)11:48 No.16048616
    Textbook for what? I'm honestly curious.
    >> Anonymous 08/24/11(Wed)11:49 No.16048622
         File1314200980.png-(180 KB, 428x510, laughing_tears_blue.png)
    180 KB
    I've gotta say thanks to you for pouring your heart out. Before I assumed you were some gigantic asshole, but now I just see that you're severely damaged goods.
    >> Anonymous 08/24/11(Wed)11:49 No.16048624
    So, I was starting up a Dark Eldar army to be my non-Spess Mehreen 40k army (especially since Daemons and CSM are not the same army anymore), and I now want to base my Archon on this Plouton fellow.

    I can't decide if Sanguinatus should be the Kabal's Haemonculus or the Dracon leading the Trueborn squad (since he's already painted up wearing red armor).
    >> Anonymous 08/24/11(Wed)11:49 No.16048625
    Okay, okay, okay guys
    Look, I might have been lying about 4 hours. In truth, this happened like 6 years ago and I never looked at a clock once. It's entirely possible that it felt like four hours due to being tripped out, but actually took all day.

    What I should have said was 50/50, as in half the time was horrible and half the time was great. Also, was it LSD? I don't know. My gf said it was LSD about 2 seconds before putting the sugar cube in my mouth and taking her clothes off. I didn't argue or question.

    As for Salvia, I've smoked it once with two friends. I felt absolutely nothing and was dissappointed. My friend . . . . freaked the fuck out.
    He said he was trapped in a black and white flip book, and as the pages turned they were "rippling" up his arms and legs and his skin was starting to peel and chafe as the page-ripples passed over his body.
    Then he fell off the couch and started screaming because he couldn't see the floor and thought that if he let go of the couch he would fall into eternity.
    I tried not to laugh at him through the whole thing. 5 minutes later he was fine and we all got drunk and laughed.
    Those are 2 of the grand total of 3 drug-related experiences I've ever had.
    >> Anonymous 08/24/11(Wed)11:50 No.16048630
    >What I find disgusting is you people who attempt to jump him merely for his belief.
    Jump him with what? He's an adult. It would be inimical to my existence were he to be placed in a position of authority over me. I don't see anything wrong with stating my opposition to his position, nor asking him to further my curiosity.
    >> Anonymous 08/24/11(Wed)11:52 No.16048643
    Fuck man, 20x extract, the lightest extract the shop carried. And it hits like a fucking Lascannon.

    Yeah, you're right. Probably wasn't a psychedelic amphetamine.

    My skills are slipping. I need to get rid of that 420chan ban.
    >> Anonymous 08/24/11(Wed)11:52 No.16048649
    Then good sir, you might be reasonable.
    But take a look at the others will you?
    >> Anonymous 08/24/11(Wed)11:53 No.16048663
    What others? I'm the one that's asked him almost every question in this thread.
    >> Ragnasal !!69YZM9mjEHH 08/24/11(Wed)11:54 No.16048665
    Reset your router.
    >> Anonymous 08/24/11(Wed)11:54 No.16048669

    Thank you for confirming

    >> Anonymous 08/24/11(Wed)11:55 No.16048675
    >reality flip book



    There are few things as scary as seeing reality being deconstructed before your eyes.
    >> Anonymous 08/24/11(Wed)11:55 No.16048677
    I just had it sorta bad.
    I met a girl in high school had been abused for years sexually and otherwise. Was ugly, otherwise I would have and could have hit it. Befriended her, deliberately broke her heart for a reason I don't know. Turned into a weird weeaboo goth hybrid.
    Now SHE was fucked up.
    >> Anonymous 08/24/11(Wed)11:55 No.16048679
         File1314201346.jpg-(54 KB, 545x588, do you catan 100.jpg)
    54 KB
    >> God-Emperor of Mankind 08/24/11(Wed)11:55 No.16048681
         File1314201352.jpg-(8 KB, 480x129, Sergal.jpg)
    8 KB

    This is how you confuse me all the time.
    >> Anonymous 08/24/11(Wed)11:56 No.16048687
         File1314201383.png-(20 KB, 350x264, 5browsing.png)
    20 KB
    Not many gentlemen are privileged of having a dynamic IP good sir.

    It is very erroneous to assumed that if one individual has it, then everyone must as well.
    >> Anonymous 08/24/11(Wed)11:56 No.16048689
    Ignoring the whiteknights are we? I am ashamed of your ignorance and will to overlook it.
    Look at something like:
    >> Anonymous 08/24/11(Wed)11:57 No.16048696
    >> Anonymous 08/24/11(Wed)11:58 No.16048707
    Who cares about them? They commented on the dialogue, but what's the matter with that? If I can accept what I view as astonishing ignorance on the part of the guy I'm talking to, I can certainly accept what I view as a smaller ignorance on the part of people butting in.
    >> Ragnasal !!69YZM9mjEHH 08/24/11(Wed)11:58 No.16048710
    >type in address bar
    >Go to router options
    >Enable 'dynamic IP configuration'

    I dont evade bans, but when I do I use Clear.
    >> Anonymous 08/24/11(Wed)11:58 No.16048711
    Wait, are you a woman?
    That would explain a lot.
    >> Anonymous 08/24/11(Wed)12:00 No.16048719
    In truth I was kind of jealous. My experience with LSD showed me "reality deconstruction" in a very bad way, so hearing salvia described as a flip book (which I associate with childhood frivolity) seemed pleasant by comparison.
    >> Anonymous 08/24/11(Wed)12:00 No.16048724
         File1314201635.png-(27 KB, 513x600, 5whatisthis.png)
    27 KB
    Do do realize some gentlemen can only access the internet through private networks? And those often then not, most only have static IPs.
    >> Anonymous 08/24/11(Wed)12:01 No.16048729
    Riend de visage.

    Really? Don't you have any concept of how different service providers might handle their IPs?
    >> Anonymous 08/24/11(Wed)12:03 No.16048745
    Would it? Do you feel up to explaining what it would explain?
    >> Anonymous 08/24/11(Wed)12:05 No.16048763
    feeling offended enough to spend hours asking him questions in hopes of minimizing him by finding out a psychological explanation that would assimilate his opinion to a mechanical reaction to his social context devoid of sincerity.

    that's it.
    >> Anonymous 08/24/11(Wed)12:06 No.16048767
    Look at it this way:
    Women are raised to not stick around abusers, and are raised to SCREAM rape if they get in a position vagely resembeling something.
    And yes: That includes drunk sex that both parties also agreed on.
    For men? We never get any support, we are suppose to be tough, we are suppose bottle up our emotions, and be nice to total assholes of women.
    Women won't get it becasue society never puts them in the same situation.
    "My boyfriend was abusive" is all they got too say, but that it. You never hear them talk about "All men are whores, because they are".
    >> Ragnasal !!69YZM9mjEHH 08/24/11(Wed)12:06 No.16048768
    Viewpoints on

    Women: Objectified, villified and sexually oppresed beings that enjoy being emotionally and physically traumatized to the point of having an excuse to play the victim. Or if not, they tend to be a raging cuntwhore. If so, they manipulate, grow fat and whoreish, and try to lead a life of decadence and laziness.

    Men: Despicable, violent things that tend to need to assert their lives by destroying or ruining the lives of others. If they are not busy fucking, rutting, or rolling around in their own shit they are planning on fucking others over.

    My Solution: Fear. Overwhelming, mortality-realizing fear need to be inspired in both parties. Break into a house, bind them up, and screw with their minds for roughly six hours. Keep them silent, unable to scream or call for help and make them slowly bleed, to feel life ebb from their very existence. Patch them up before critical symptoms show up, and wait for them to wake up. Repeat the process, this time with emphasis on making them unable to change their fates. After the second time they pass out, cut them loose, rest them on the bed (keep the bloody sheets there for more trauma), and clean up after yourself. Keep your gloves, clean your blades and keep everything on you, and make sure they never get to see your face. Just your eyes.
    >> Anonymous 08/24/11(Wed)12:07 No.16048776
    Ah, I see. Thanks. Men don't do that, then?
    >> Anonymous 08/24/11(Wed)12:08 No.16048783
         File1314202107.jpg-(620 KB, 1212x2076, warhammer fantasy of gor.jpg)
    620 KB
    >> Anonymous 08/24/11(Wed)12:09 No.16048787
    Man the fuck up, bro. I'm not telling you to stop despising women, but dammit, if you can't take their bullshit, you're not much of a man.
    >> Anonymous 08/24/11(Wed)12:09 No.16048788
    Why you'd care, why you'd sit for hours attempting laughably to psychoanalyze my past, why you're so passive-aggressive, muted, and submissive about a philosophy you can only comprehend as inimical to you (which it is not).
    >> Anonymous 08/24/11(Wed)12:10 No.16048793
    That is not me.
    >> Anonymous 08/24/11(Wed)12:10 No.16048794
    >LSD is for going inna woods and melting into the foliage
    But that's where Slendy lives.
    >> Anonymous 08/24/11(Wed)12:10 No.16048795
         File1314202217.jpg-(56 KB, 600x453, 1234834716141.jpg)
    56 KB
    >> Anonymous 08/24/11(Wed)12:10 No.16048796
    Less often, and men aren't so easily offended by misogyny.
    >> Anonymous 08/24/11(Wed)12:10 No.16048799
    Me? No, I want to be abused by women.
    I would not mind being used as property either.
    It is all the other ones I am disgusted by.
    And then we got misgynist-kun over there, which actually has issues on the side of hatred.
    >> Anonymous 08/24/11(Wed)12:11 No.16048801
         File1314202294.gif-(127 KB, 700x449, Internettoughguys.gif)
    127 KB
    >> Ragnasal !!69YZM9mjEHH 08/24/11(Wed)12:11 No.16048804
    ... Ironically, I'm in no sense of the word a goth or emo faggot. Just a basement dweller with some serious people skill issues.
    >> Anonymous 08/24/11(Wed)12:11 No.16048805
    Getting wagered as a sex slave over a game of Warhammer has got to be as low as a woman can sink.

    I'm surprised that it's not a more common fantasy.
    >> Anonymous 08/24/11(Wed)12:13 No.16048810
    I once considered playing a game of Catan with my D&D group and then using the map of the island at game's end (when one player wins) as the map for the next D&D game we'd play.

    Polite sage for mostly off topic.
    >> Anonymous 08/24/11(Wed)12:13 No.16048811
    I think I should clarify my motives, lest words be put in my mouth.
    >feeling offended enough to spend hours asking him questions
    Foremost, my questions aren't born out of 'feeling offended'. I am not personally offended by this guy's opinion, even though I find it disgusting. I was, and am, extremely interested in his background.
    >in hopes of minimizing him
    As in, what? Making it easier to ignore him? I'm paying plenty of attention, not the opposite.
    >by finding out a psychological explanation
    I was curious as to a potential psychological explanation, sure. But that's so iffy and vague, I really just wanted to see what he'd say.
    >that would assimilate his opinion to a mechanical reaction to his social context devoid of sincerity
    You begin to break down here, for me. I'm guessing 'so you could process it into some box and forget about it' is about what this says, but I'm wrong please correct me.

    I'm not trying to fritter away his opinion. Legally, he can vote as validly as I can and that's something I have to accept. So I completely do not dismiss his opinion, in fact I pay a great deal of attention to it. I am somewhat sorry that he had a tough upbringing, but a lot of us do. I'm sympathetic to that but I would hope my sincerity is genuine, not merely a response. I think you're really getting into solipsism there though.
    >> Anonymous 08/24/11(Wed)12:14 No.16048812


    actually there's this one gothy douche at my local GW who's girlfriend is kind of hot. I would Bring The Pain, even though my Fantasy army is exactly three models, all of them heroes.
    >> Anonymous 08/24/11(Wed)12:14 No.16048813
    Funny, nobody ever yelled RAPE!!! at me or any of my friends for having sex with a drunk chick.
    Maybe that's because we don't fuck chicks who are so drunk that they already passed out.

    Just accept "if she can't walk anymore, she can't consent" as a rule of thumb, what's so hard to grasp about that?
    Are you some puritan who has asinine ideas about alcohol, such as YOU PLANNED TO GET WASTED AND IT'S IMPOSSIBLE THAT YOU DRANK MORE THAN INTENDED?
    >> Anonymous 08/24/11(Wed)12:14 No.16048820
         File1314202494.jpg-(37 KB, 400x300, 1234834716150.jpg)
    37 KB
    "I have issues" usually translates to "I think I'm special but don't want to show it."
    >> Anonymous 08/24/11(Wed)12:15 No.16048823
    I don't hate women, you pathetic waste of a good Y-chromosome. I couldn't hate a thing I would fuck instead of rape.
    I hate men like you.
    Women can't help it, it's who they are. You, on the other hand, enable them.
    >> Anonymous 08/24/11(Wed)12:16 No.16048830
    >these two threads
    >shit I really need to buy Settlers of Catan
    >> Anonymous 08/24/11(Wed)12:16 No.16048837
    >Why you'd care
    Out of interest, honestly. I have a real interest for mentality. I hugely enjoy talking to people of mentalities that differ from mine's.
    >why you'd sit for hours attempting laughably to psychoanalyze my past
    I'm not trying to psychoanalyze you at all. I'm not qualified! So please don't think this.
    >why you're so passive-aggressive
    I hope I'm not? I've tried to be upfront about my curiosity and issues with you. If you disagree, please explain further.
    I'm really not sure how I've been "muted" so you will have to clarify this one for me, I'm afraid.
    >and submissive
    Have I been submissive? I disagree with you completely, but I thought that was clear from the start.
    >about a philosophy you can only comprehend as inimical to you (which it is not).
    From my viewpoint, I have to point out that it very much is. We won't reach a compromise on this point.
    >> Anonymous 08/24/11(Wed)12:19 No.16048858
         File1314202761.jpg-(18 KB, 290x430, Teuber_Portrait_2010_290x430.jpg)
    18 KB
    >> Anonymous 08/24/11(Wed)12:19 No.16048859
    If you're playing with goths, you should be playing Kettlers of Satan.

    It's pretty similar, except the resources are coal, brass, water, souls, and tea leaves.
    >> Anonymous 08/24/11(Wed)12:19 No.16048862
         File1314202795.gif-(400 KB, 1024x576, Eat_and_despair.gif)
    400 KB
    I am not amused by your lack of ability to read and comprehend.
    Your ability to get butthurt is even worse.
    I was not even stating 1 party drunk, I was stating that BOTH of them where so waisted they have no idea what vile acts they did last night.
    And she will then press rape charges on him, and if the country allows it, he will go to jail without a shred of evidence making him guilty.
    And this is normal.
    Some countries have the decenty to ask the guy if he was drunk too, and some others will ignore it because it is "RAPE! RAPE! RAPE!" as they screamed, without any reason other than indictrination
    >> Anonymous 08/24/11(Wed)12:21 No.16048872
    Catan never got ME into risque sexual situations.

    Munchkin on the other hand...
    >> Anonymous 08/24/11(Wed)12:22 No.16048876

    Border's going out of business sale is currently 40-60% off. MSRP of Settlers of Catan is $42. That means it could be just under $17.

    Seventeen dollars to find out how momentous your aura is.
    >> Anonymous 08/24/11(Wed)12:22 No.16048879
    Citations, please. The nature of alcohol law is typically along the lines of 'incapacity is no defense, unless you were completely incapable' so by virtue of having sex, the man was not but the woman possibly was. You see? It's a legal position taken to enforce that the idea of getting extremely drunk and then fucking someone is not a very good idea.
    >> Anonymous 08/24/11(Wed)12:22 No.16048883
    There are some incredibly naive and unfortunate people on /tg/.
    Holy Shit.
    >> Anonymous 08/24/11(Wed)12:22 No.16048884

    What color is your aura?
    >> Anonymous 08/24/11(Wed)12:24 No.16048896
    Oh gosh! What side of the debate do you fall on, anon? Which side are being naive?
    >> Anonymous 08/24/11(Wed)12:24 No.16048897
    >Over 200 replies
    >No one posts the copypasta

    Does anyone have it. Definately made me lol

    Or a sceencap atleast

    In case you're wondering, it was a great fap piece about playing catan of a girls naked body. It was the best piece of viral marketting ever, and convinced me to play catan, and helped me learn the rules.
    >> Anonymous 08/24/11(Wed)12:25 No.16048900
    Then don't try to understand something you cannot, honeybunch. It's just going over your head.

    You've quietly emanated disapproval instead of having a real opinion. That answers all three.

    And I only want the best for you, sweetie pie. See, I just don't want you to worry about anything ever again. How is that a bad thing? I don't see how you see that as malice, alright?
    >> Anonymous 08/24/11(Wed)12:25 No.16048904
    Ok, you clearly did not get my references.

    Also I have it for years, but thanks for your consideration.
    >> Anonymous 08/24/11(Wed)12:25 No.16048906
    Whichever implies getting laid a lot. So probably some kind of pinkish purple.
    >> Anonymous 08/24/11(Wed)12:26 No.16048915
         File1314203217.jpg-(12 KB, 280x255, laughing vampire.jpg)
    12 KB
    >Settlers of Catan: $17-$25 at Border's going out of business sale
    >15 minute psychic readings at the local occult bookstore: $25
    >> Anonymous 08/24/11(Wed)12:27 No.16048916
    Spinless? Nope
    Wants to be abused? Yes
    Wants to be properly abused? NO!
    Look at it this way: The "whores" are disgusting, as as the "giggoloes".
    Whores will stab a large rusty knife in your back, because they don't want anything but sex. I can't have one of them as my master, and the same applies to the male whores.
    I guess I am different than a lot of those spineless bastards, and those "I want a relationship! buhu!"-white knights that will be abused because they think its ok.
    >> Anonymous 08/24/11(Wed)12:27 No.16048918
    rolled 61 = 61

    Hold up bro. The misogyny isn't the only bit in there that one might find worthy of questioning. I for one, find any worldview that posits anyone should simply accept a servile role and be recognized as property just as contrary to my interests as other anon finds the misogyny. I'm just as interested in hearing the answers to the questions, but it's not a dismissal thing; it's an understanding thing.
    >> Anonymous 08/24/11(Wed)12:27 No.16048919
         File1314203259.jpg-(39 KB, 351x390, bemused vampire.jpg)
    39 KB

    >> Anonymous 08/24/11(Wed)12:27 No.16048920
    If you don't want rape charges after fucking a drunk chick, stop being such an ugly socially retarded asspie.

    I never got into trouble for drunken sex, because I actually look good.

    Taking care of your appearance and sports HAVE a function in life.
    >> Anonymous 08/24/11(Wed)12:28 No.16048924
    I know.
    You're just into femdom.
    The point stands.
    >> Anonymous 08/24/11(Wed)12:29 No.16048929
    And what do you think would happen if the dude pressed the same rape charges as the girl?
    He would get laughed at over the phone, and the case would never be explored.
    And I am silly? Hardly. The law is irrelevant, for it also applies to the girl.
    >> Anonymous 08/24/11(Wed)12:29 No.16048934
    Why? My worldview doesn't affect you, except in a sort of positive way depending on how you look at it.
    >> Anonymous 08/24/11(Wed)12:30 No.16048936
    Now this is passive-aggressiveness.

    >You've quietly emanated disapproval instead of having a real opinion.
    I've done anything but, anon. I very much disagree with your outlook and have categorically stated so. I haven't lost my temper, but I have no reason to.

    On the Spearhead forums, I've seen a screencap where someone was badgered into posting their dick, so the other posters could know conclusively that they were talking to a man. Even in such an environment, that seemed unusually paranoid to me. I wondered how that sort of thing could come about. Now I know. So, thanks.
    >> Anonymous 08/24/11(Wed)12:31 No.16048943
    I guess it does.

    Inability to read? Again?
    Silly women.
    >> Anonymous 08/24/11(Wed)12:31 No.16048944
    Read the common legal definition of incapacity again, understand it this time.
    >> Anonymous 08/24/11(Wed)12:31 No.16048947
    They should make it so that whenever a thread talks about gender issues all people in it are banned and the thread is deleted because it always becomes a fucking shitstorm.
    >> Anonymous 08/24/11(Wed)12:32 No.16048951
    why I'm glad you asked, fellow anon!

    BOTH sides are naive in their own way!
    See, gender has nothing to do with "good" or "bad" at all! Crazy, isn't it!
    It all boils down to an individual human being, the events they've been exposed to, and the choices they've made! And the really crazy thing is that two people subjected to the same experiences will make different choices, and EVEN MORE crazy, if the same person experiences the exact same thing twice, they can still make different choices!

    Also, misogyny is a form of stereotyping, and that's ignorance! Not to mention pathetic (but that part is just my opinion), and it puts you at a serious disadvantage when dealing with women on many, many levels.

    furthermore, treating others with condescension and imposed superiority is a classic sign of fear!

    Everyone is all kinds of wrong everywhere!
    >> Anonymous 08/24/11(Wed)12:32 No.16048953
    I'm not being aggressive at all, just talking to you, cupcake. I'm just explaining things in a way you'd understand.
    Your version of categorically disagreeing is apparently quite different from mine. No doubt in that.
    >> Anonymous 08/24/11(Wed)12:33 No.16048960
    Stereotyping is a valid form of pattern recognition.
    >> Anonymous 08/24/11(Wed)12:33 No.16048961
    Lets say you got drunk, fainted, girl drags you to a hotel, and has sex with you while you are down.
    Did or did she not rape you?
    This is not even a part of the original scenario.

    The original scenarion are 2 people(perhaps friends?) who get together, and both of them drink too much, and somehow end up having sex while both of them are in their blackouts.
    >> Anonymous 08/24/11(Wed)12:33 No.16048962
    I see how this is argument against one side, but not against the other. Nobody said all women were good.
    >> Anonymous 08/24/11(Wed)12:35 No.16048965
    rolled 329 = 329


    Mostly the number of people I've known and thought to be friends who have held on to a such view in silence, then expressed it in the worst possible way at the worst possible time.

    Which is to say, my disagreement with your worldview has nothing to do with you, and everything to do with my personal experiences, but all the same, it's something I've come to have a reflexive distaste for.
    >> Anonymous 08/24/11(Wed)12:36 No.16048978
    Depends on her looks.

    It's all about looks man.

    Learn it.

    Pretty people can grab boobs and asses at random, JUST BECAUSE THEY LOOK GOOD.
    >> Anonymous 08/24/11(Wed)12:36 No.16048980
    The worst way I express it is telling a friend about it.
    Just telling them.
    There is no need to trouble a woman with something she wouldn't get anyways.
    >> Anonymous 08/24/11(Wed)12:37 No.16048983
    >Your version of categorically disagreeing is apparently quite different from mine.
    >'Categorically' - Being without exception or qualification; absolute.
    >'Disagreeing' - Disapprove of.
    I'd posit it's the correct one all the same. I'm been quite clear in my absolute disapproval.

    It does bother me a little that you've assumed I was a woman. I'd ask for your reasoning, but I expect I'd probably get an answer like - 'it's obvious' - and I don't think that'd help me any.
    >> Anonymous 08/24/11(Wed)12:39 No.16049000
         File1314203998.jpg-(15 KB, 250x250, 1313795484294.jpg)
    15 KB
    >> Anonymous 08/24/11(Wed)12:41 No.16049006
    The assumption is simple:
    Either you are a blind white knight
    Or you are a female.
    1 or 2?
    >> Anonymous 08/24/11(Wed)12:42 No.16049016
    Because you are accepting my views. You cannot accept abhorrent views.
    My reasoning is that women are simply meant to be that way. They enjoy being submissive to a man. It's their nature.
    >> Anonymous 08/24/11(Wed)12:42 No.16049018
    Let me just clearly establish the reasoning for this: I am 1 or 2 because I disagree with your viewpoint - which is that women should be property, or slaves? That's a correct summation?
    >> Anonymous 08/24/11(Wed)12:43 No.16049022
    Then why feminism exists?
    >> Anonymous 08/24/11(Wed)12:43 No.16049027
         File1314204233.jpg-(226 KB, 810x1200, dinosaur rider of gor.jpg)
    226 KB
    >/tg/ thread derailment of Gor
    >> Anonymous 08/24/11(Wed)12:44 No.16049028
    'Disagree' does not mean 'accept', anon.
    >> Anonymous 08/24/11(Wed)12:44 No.16049034
    No, its because you are showing large levels of "butthurt" and large levels of "attempting to deconstruct".
    Nothing more and nothing less.
    That or you are indoctrinated to be completely intolerant, and don't worry, my entire country is indoctrinated with it.
    >> Anonymous 08/24/11(Wed)12:45 No.16049037

    everyone enjoys being submissive to something.

    most statements about a particular group of humanity is true of the whole, particularly when it's something phycological.
    >> Anonymous 08/24/11(Wed)12:45 No.16049041
         File1314204347.jpg-(9 KB, 212x191, looking over glasses.jpg)
    9 KB

    >> Anonymous 08/24/11(Wed)12:46 No.16049044
    arguing with Goreans is like arguing with Mormons.
    They aren't going to listen to you unless you have a court order to stop them from doing their ignorant, illegal shit.
    >> Anonymous 08/24/11(Wed)12:47 No.16049053
    Essentially. But you automatically assume that is bad.
    The two can coexist.
    Because of misguided men, and misguided women.
    >> Anonymous 08/24/11(Wed)12:47 No.16049054
    What? I'm sorry, but reasoning is integral to sensible argument. How is "attempting to deconstruct" a bad thing? If you mean psychological deconstruction, I've already clarified that I am interested primarily in information alone.

    You can't say I'm accepting your views because I'm not mad and then a woman or whiteknight because I'm mad, anon. That's just contradictory.
    >> Anonymous 08/24/11(Wed)12:50 No.16049079
    >The two can coexist.
    Yes, but that doesn't make them the same.

    >Essentially. But you automatically assume that is bad.
    I'm afraid I do. I clearly read John Rawls when I was too impressionable.
    >> Anonymous 08/24/11(Wed)12:51 No.16049089
    rolled 688 = 688


    In actuality, no matter what you do or think, the consequences of it will most likely never reach me. We're just two anonymous people on the internet. I see it as harmful, but not enough that I'll actually try to dissuade you from it - though I would like to understand the thought process that brought you there a little better.

    I suppose I'd post the "I disagree, but I'm pretty sure you're not Hitler" picture if I had it now.
    >> Anonymous 08/24/11(Wed)12:53 No.16049106
    And now you are getting insulted over the fact i point it out.
    Poor sod.
    >> Anonymous 08/24/11(Wed)12:55 No.16049111
    How do you explain it? Can you explain why you believe women to be equals?
    Clearly you did.
    There is nothing wrong with women being property. You just assume it'd be awful because, well, you're female and thus unable to comprehend complex things.
    >> Anonymous 08/24/11(Wed)12:59 No.16049144
    The fact you pointed what out? Nor am I insulted. You can't just say things and pretend like they're deep, incisive points - well, you can, but it only works for yourself.

    >You just assume it'd be awful
    I assume it'd be awful because I believe in a system of the largest freedom of rights compatible with a similar freedom of rights for others.
    >> Anonymous 08/24/11(Wed)13:01 No.16049164
    Such a system assumes equality in all participants, doll. It's kind of a hard concept, I know, honey. Don't worry about it.
    >> Anonymous 08/24/11(Wed)13:01 No.16049169
         File1314205314.png-(2 KB, 213x165, huh.png)
    2 KB
    Wait... is Plouton actually posting in this thread?
    >> Anonymous 08/24/11(Wed)13:04 No.16049189
    >There is nothing wrong with women being property
    And next some guy is going to ignore how slavery was in the ancient world. So long you only had a few slaves, those few slaves was well taken care of.
    You had something to do, and a master to command you around.
    Abuse was never really present until you could aquire many slaves.
    What happened when slavery was industrialized was horrible, but it was not slavery anymore.

    >I am not butthurt
    Keep telling that to yourself
    >I assume it'd be awful because I believe in a system of the largest freedom of rights compatible with a similar freedom of rights for others.
    Then you don't know shit about slavery.
    Nobody wants freedom, they want to have a life.
    You are assuming slavery would be bad based sonely on mistreated negroids back in the days of glorious racism.
    Yes they where being treated bad, extremely bad. But the workers was wageslaves in a worse condition than the slaves until labour laws came.
    Look at it this way: If slavery existed in the modern world, there would be attempts to snap up bright minds, to allow them to become great scholars.
    Normal slaves would be treated allright, and there would be laws and regulations around it, just like it is with factory workers these days.
    >> Anonymous 08/24/11(Wed)13:05 No.16049194
    It doesn't, actually. It assumes margins of equality but not a fixed value.

    Anyway, I'm a dude. I wanted to see how your tone changed if you thought the opposite. It was kinda depressing! But on the other hand, fairly expected.

    Hope you have fun with... whatever! And thanks again for whatever information you gave me (I'm not sure if you're the crazy Canuck), you deranged idiot.
    >> Anonymous 08/24/11(Wed)13:06 No.16049202



    >> Anonymous 08/24/11(Wed)13:07 No.16049209
    Sure you are.
    Which is why you stated in the very beginning, come to think of it, that my views would be inimical to you were they to com in power.
    Despite, if you were male, the fact it wouldn't affect you.
    Run along now, sweetie. You're getting hysterical.
    >> Anonymous 08/24/11(Wed)13:08 No.16049226
    Somebody call a doctor and a psycolog, anon-kun apparently lost it.
    >> Anonymous 08/24/11(Wed)13:12 No.16049262

    >> Anonymous 08/24/11(Wed)13:12 No.16049265
    rolled 644 = 644


    Honestly? I can't really make a very strong argument for why I believe women to be equal to men, though I probably couldn't do very well at the reverse either. A personal failing. BUT since that's not what I take issue with, or something I feel qualified to argue, I don't really think it matters right now. I'm pretty sure I can make a decent argument for women at least being people, and since my personal beef is with any person being treated like property, I'm pretty confident in the strength of my position on that.
    >> Anonymous 08/24/11(Wed)13:13 No.16049275
         File1314206017.jpg-(20 KB, 450x300, twinpeaks3.jpg)
    20 KB
    I'm on it.
    >> Anonymous 08/24/11(Wed)13:13 No.16049279
    They would be inimical. I'm an advocate of John Rawls. Did you miss that? Or we can quote some Bakunin.
    >"The freedom of all is essential to my freedom."
    These kind of beliefs are not compatible with a form of slavery.

    Of course, I expected you would take that as a sign I was female. Although if I was, I'm not sure why you'd expect me to pretend otherwise for your benefit. Then again, if you believe that all women are naturally subservient then of course that would fit.

    In short, talking to you for a couple of hours has revealed to me why people on chauvinist forums will show each other their cocks.
    >> Anonymous 08/24/11(Wed)13:14 No.16049285
    firstly, this

    secondly, slavery being wrong has nothing to do with how slaves are treated. At all.
    The ability for self-determination is literally the only thing that separates humans from the 99% of known life.
    The concept of slavery is the intellectual destruction of that distinction. Reducing the only creature capable of reason to the state of an animal is an affront to whatever gods you may worship, and nature itself, as well as the moral and ethical foundations of every modern society.
    People are not property. Only a short life of ease and security could lead one to have the opinions you seem to hold. I would suggest you hold your tongue around adults until you stumble into some semblance of wisdom and accountability.
    >> Anonymous 08/24/11(Wed)13:14 No.16049289
    Labor laws only came about because of intense struggles for workers' rights. The owning class, whether they literally own their workers or not, never gives up power willingly, and is always working to reclaim what it's been forced to give up.
    Industrialized slavery is not something that will simply go away because you ask nicely and pass a few laws. What's more, by permitting slavery, you're further robbing workers of their ability to organize. They'll have to act out more drastically in order to protect themselves from complete exploitation - in effect, you've traded dramatic but ultimately nonviolent strikes for bloody slave revolts
    >> Anonymous 08/24/11(Wed)13:14 No.16049290
    Can you make the argument that men are equal to women?
    >> Anonymous 08/24/11(Wed)13:16 No.16049301
    >Can you explain why you believe women to be equals?
    Lack of proof to the contrary?
    >> Anonymous 08/24/11(Wed)13:16 No.16049304
    rolled 440 = 440

    Man, I just said here >>16049265
    that I don't think I can.

    But now I'm getting involved and whatnot when I originally just intended to lurk and try to understand a bit more about people I disagree with.
    >> Anonymous 08/24/11(Wed)13:17 No.16049311
    probably, but you would need a fairly wide definition of "equal".

    I would say that at the bottom line men and women, as a universal rule, cannot exist without each other. That alone is enough to make them equal in my opinion.
    Separate, different . . . . . but ultimately equal.
    >> Anonymous 08/24/11(Wed)13:17 No.16049312
    no, because they are not
    Men != Women
    Men !> Women
    Men !< Women
    >> Anonymous 08/24/11(Wed)13:19 No.16049320
    You said to YOU. It affects you none, so it cannot be inimical.
    That being?
    Of course not. That'd be absurd.
    Equal. Right.
    >> Anonymous 08/24/11(Wed)13:19 No.16049322
    If you want to make a statement, the burden of proof is on you.

    Beyond that, the answer would probably be something along the lines of: Human men and women vary across a range of human norms, mentally (this is the only important part in modern society), but both of them largely correspond and always fall within the extremes of the other gender. Therefore, there is no significant difference in the mental element of different-gender humans.
    >> Anonymous 08/24/11(Wed)13:21 No.16049337
    Um. It does, though. A society where women were property would be completely inimical to my held values and mentality.

    You're becoming wearing. I wanted to stop replying when you said I was passive-aggressive, I pointed out you were and then you said 'there's nothing aggressive here'. First thought: well, no, I said passive-aggressive. I shouldn't have continued past that, although I'll stay until end of the thread now.
    >> Anonymous 08/24/11(Wed)13:24 No.16049350
    You cannot be passive-aggressive without any intended aggression. I meant none.
    How would such a society harm your values/mentality?
    >> Anonymous 08/24/11(Wed)13:30 No.16049424
    >Reduce humans to animals.
    Troll, sir. =D

    Correct, but the issue has nevertheless been fixed.
    Why would it be impossible for normal slavery to be changed via laws?
    Slaving was banned, and as result it was banned.

    >inb4 slavery is EVULZ
    >> Anonymous 08/24/11(Wed)13:30 No.16049428
    >I'm not being aggressive at all, just talking to you, cupcake. I'm just explaining things in a way you'd understand.
    >Your version of categorically disagreeing is apparently quite different from mine. No doubt in that.
    Ambiguity and sweetened hostility are key identifiers of passive-aggressive behaviour. If you ever get into a real argument involving this position, your excuse won't wash.

    >How would such a society harm your values/mentality?
    It would be incompatible with them to a far larger degree than our current society is. This should be obvious from what I've said so far in this thread, so I would advise you look up John Rawls if you have never studied him before. Especially legally, he has been very influential so this should be constructive to your criticisms of the status quo too.
    >> Anonymous 08/24/11(Wed)13:32 No.16049448
    rolled 72 = 72

    Seriously, dude? What quality is it you think women are lacking that makes them subhuman?

    I know what you mean. I keep meaning to leave it alone and get out of here, but I can't help but come back every time.
    >> Anonymous 08/24/11(Wed)13:34 No.16049466
    Note the lack of a response to: >>16049322
    >> Anonymous 08/24/11(Wed)13:35 No.16049473
         File1314207357.jpg-(182 KB, 750x1000, seetmusic.jpg)
    182 KB
    Anons in this thread seem knowledgeable..is this how I should bard?
    >> Anonymous 08/24/11(Wed)13:36 No.16049478
    I wouldn't argue with a woman. It's a fool's game. I was attempting to pacify a woman with niceties.
    That speaks nothing of how it would harm them, instead speaking of you not knowing what "inimical" means. It means "tending to obstruct or harm".
    >> Anonymous 08/24/11(Wed)13:37 No.16049490
    I do not think them subhuman.
    They are just not people.
    >> Anonymous 08/24/11(Wed)13:38 No.16049497
    no, that's terrible

    there's no way she'll be able to hold still enough to keep tension on the strings.
    Furthermore, the elasticity of skin would make it impossible to tune the thing. Simply preposterous
    >> Anonymous 08/24/11(Wed)13:39 No.16049503
    A human would make a terrible acoustic box, what with the elasticity of skin and flesh
    >> Anonymous 08/24/11(Wed)13:39 No.16049509
    I was thinking more of using her as the instrument, and the strings merely as a way to elicit the sighs and cries out of her vocal system to be honest...
    >> Anonymous 08/24/11(Wed)13:39 No.16049512
    Mostly because I didn't pose the question.
    >> Anonymous 08/24/11(Wed)13:40 No.16049518
    Yes. Tending to obstruct or harm. It is my ideal that everyone should have the largest freedom of rights compatible with a similar freedom of rights for others. Okay? And you don't see how enslaving 50% of the human race is incompatible to that? You don't see how it obstructs that ideal? How it harms it? If not, you are so removed from reality that no argument with you is possible.
    >> Anonymous 08/24/11(Wed)13:42 No.16049530
    How does a prevailing political and social climate harm your beliefs? Beliefs are inviolate.
    >> Anonymous 08/24/11(Wed)13:43 No.16049540
    >It is my ideal that everyone should have the largest freedom of rights compatible with a similar freedom of rights for others.
    >It would be incompatible with them to a far larger degree than our current society is.
    >"inimical" means "tending to obstruct or harm"
    Conclusion: you are an idiot. Thanks for playing, I really can't be bothered anymore.
    >> Anonymous 08/24/11(Wed)13:45 No.16049556
    How would it OBSTRUCT what you BELIEVE?
    The prevailing social climate is not inimical to my beliefs, despite being just as incompatible. I'm not suggesting a thought police.
    >> Anonymous 08/24/11(Wed)13:45 No.16049557
    rolled 270 = 270

    Mmm.Sorry, boss. My fault for using the terms human and people interchangeably. So I will rephrase: I believe that no human, or for that matter, no sentient, sapient being should ever be treated as property; your argument that women should be entirely subservient runs contrary to that.
    >> Anonymous 08/24/11(Wed)13:47 No.16049566
    I see. Why is that?
    >> Anonymous 08/24/11(Wed)13:48 No.16049575
    >It is my ideal
    >It is my ideal
    >It is my ideal
    >> Anonymous 08/24/11(Wed)13:48 No.16049581
    if you're going to play the human itself, percussion is the way to go.

    The problem with the string setup is that it always stimulates the exact same piece of skin, so eventually the nerves burn out and go numb and then well ya got nuthin'

    Percussion on the other hand almost never hits the exact same place twice. It also affords you much greater flexibility as you have tools ranging from the classic bullwhip through the cat-o-nine's up to small clubs or even spiked maces.
    These all elicit different variations on the sensation of pain, which are akin to different notes of a regular instrument.
    They can also be used to elicit pleasure in varying ways, which opens up an entirely new spectrum of harmonics and notes to play with.
    Just make sure all your tools are drumstick-sized. You can't play a dead girl.
    >> Anonymous 08/24/11(Wed)13:50 No.16049593
    And it's MY ideal to the opposite. Again, not inimical. I am affected in my ideals not one whit by women being considered equals.
    >> Anonymous 08/24/11(Wed)13:53 No.16049612
    Oh, that's good idea! I was thinking of plugging her into organs, but it'd require serious magical modifications to fit the pipes inside without killing her, and equally extensive work to change the belly into air chamber...plus, it's a bit too much for travelling...but the percussion idea is sound and easier to pull off during combat, plus the bullwhip can be used offensively too if I'm in danger. Sweet, I'll go tell her to unpin herself and get into the suitcase...Also, any ideas for arrow-proof shielding for the intrument? Her sister was unfortunately broken by some unappreciative elves...
    >> Anonymous 08/24/11(Wed)13:55 No.16049631
    >believes in freedom
    >Does not believe in slavery
    What about the freedom be be enslaved? Are you denying the people that wish, for whatever reason, to be a slave that freedom?
    >> Anonymous 08/24/11(Wed)13:57 No.16049645
    A couple of mine were broken by careless orcs, I know the feeling.
    We're talking about breeding experiments, right?
    >> Anonymous 08/24/11(Wed)13:57 No.16049646
    rolled 244 = 244


    Why do I believe that? Or why does your ideal run contrary?

    I wouldn't imagine either needs much explanation, but I don't mind elaborating.

    How are you not? If your ideal more/less enslavement of women, doesn't modern society
    owning on that act directly contrary to your ideals?

    If they chose it, more power to them. They chose it, it wasn't something forced on them.
    >> Anonymous 08/24/11(Wed)13:58 No.16049650
    arrow proofing?

    hmmm . . . . . .
    Well, you technically could get away with only playing one side of the instrument, so I guess the other side could be armored.

    Oh! holy shit dig this!
    You rivet metal plating down the back and back of the legs, rivet these to the rib cage, make them overlapping plates so she can still breathe.
    Then, while you play the front side of the instrument, two things happen:
    1) she's arrow proof on the side facing the enemy
    2) the metal plating will enhance the reverberations of the instrument itself, thus amplifying it's acoustics (could maybe create some sort of metal gimp-helmet with built in bullhorn mouthpiece)

    >> Anonymous 08/24/11(Wed)13:59 No.16049659
    rolled 88 = 88

    *frowning on that
    >> Anonymous 08/24/11(Wed)14:00 No.16049673
    Ahem...not really..you know how those elven bastards don't like any music but their own? Apparently me playing "Highway to Hell" in their presence was a criminal offence, punishable by destruction of instrument...good thing her sister was so eager to take her place afterwards, I love being CHA 18...
    >> Anonymous 08/24/11(Wed)14:02 No.16049684
    The former.
    Because society doesn't affect what I believe. How would it? Anyone whose ideals are threatened by many believing to the contrary has very weak ideals.
    >> Anonymous 08/24/11(Wed)14:02 No.16049688
    Sir, I am in your debt, my tournee of the Wild Countries will not be stopped by mere elven jealousy!
    >> Anonymous 08/24/11(Wed)14:03 No.16049696
    just chipping in on this.

    Slavery is defined (in part) by an absence of the freedom of choice.
    Someone who is free, who chooses to be a slave, is not and can never be an actual slave.
    Because they are choosing, and consenting, to it.
    An actual slave does not have a choice at all, at any point, ever.
    >> Anonymous 08/24/11(Wed)14:04 No.16049706
    >If they chose it, more power to them. They chose it, it wasn't something forced on them.
    OK, good. Now that we have the Black and White, let's move on to the Grey.

    Do you believe that a human being (or person if you want to argue the semantics) should have the option to sell themselves into slavery? Making themselves, in facto, property by their own actions?
    As, say, a form of debt elimination or such.
    >> Anonymous 08/24/11(Wed)14:04 No.16049708
    Oh, of course. Elves are so narrow-minded.
    I keep elves around as a testbed. They're frailer, so you understand what human limits can take more easily.
    Lots of people don't understand my genius, I see you have the same issue.
    >> Anonymous 08/24/11(Wed)14:11 No.16049756
    True, a slave has no right to chose anything. However a person can chose to become a slave.
    Once that choice is made, however, she could not chose to end it but it was her choice originally.
    >> Anonymous 08/24/11(Wed)14:13 No.16049773
    rolled 389 = 389

    Same as above. They choose it, more power to them. Note that I am much less okay with people selling their children and the like into slavery to handle their debts. Also, I was the dude using person and human being interchangeably. I don't really care about the semantics.

    Society doesn't affect what you believe, certainly, but if you believe the world should be one way, and everyone else is determined that it should not be so isn't that pretty much the definition of one set of values being inimical to the other?

    Granted, I have not seen that word used in forever, so maybe I am reading this whole thing wrong.
    >> Anonymous 08/24/11(Wed)14:15 No.16049788
    No, "inimical" basically means my values would find it impossible to survive.
    Venus is inimical to human life.
    >> Anonymous 08/24/11(Wed)14:18 No.16049818

    suptg > easymodo cause the pictures still work
    >> Anonymous 08/24/11(Wed)14:19 No.16049828
    >As, say, a form of debt elimination or such.
    We have more humane instruments, what you suggest is indentured labor. The worst problem with that people in power can easily make it so that it's almost unavoidable, leading to general deterioration of the job market, since a slave is cheaper than properly paid worker. Slavery is not only immoral, but highly dangerous from purely economical perspective.
    >> Anonymous 08/24/11(Wed)14:26 No.16049880
    >They choose it, more power to them.
    Good, then we are in accord.
    >people selling their children and the like into slavery to handle their debts
    Well of course not. Their children are not their property and selling what you do not own is just silly...
    for certain 'gallows humour' values of 'silly'

    One issue I find with defining the persons own existence or rights as financial goods is that in the case of debt collection and repossession of goods a person might be forced to sell herself into slavery...

    >since a slave is cheaper than properly paid worker.
    Only with modern labour laws. There could easily be Basic Slave Rights laws made such as they have to be properly fed, clothed and housed, not be allowed to work more than 10 hours/day and must have access to some form of entertainment.
    There are quite strict laws for keeping animals, I don't see how we could keep humans without strict policies...
    >> Anonymous 08/24/11(Wed)14:26 No.16049887
    rolled 662 = 662

    Ah. Whoops. Well, substitute all values of inimical I may have used for being in direct opposition with my values and interests.
    >> Anonymous 08/24/11(Wed)14:30 No.16049915
    There you go.
    >> Anonymous 08/24/11(Wed)14:38 No.16049970
         File1314211104.png-(30 KB, 220x212, SoMuchWin.png)
    30 KB
    >> Anonymous 08/24/11(Wed)15:49 No.16050736
    >There could easily be Basic Slave Rights laws
    Which makes the economical value of a slave compared to a free man effectively nil. Which means no one would agree to take a slave in return for debt erasure. Making the system pointless. If you diluted the laws enough to make a slave worthwile, you're having the same problem as before- a slave is so much cheaper (not to mention kept in shitty conditions...) that it's always a better choice than a free man. All the entry-level jobs as well as skilled or unskilled physical labour would be forever closed to free people, leading to further impoverishment of them and growth of the slavery system. You're literally magnifying all that's wrong with today's system without any benefits.
    >> Anonymous 08/24/11(Wed)16:39 No.16051195
    imagine a car, yeah?
    Now you could either BUY and OWN that car or you could RENT/LEASE it

    Imagine that that car is actually a human being that is currently owning itself.
    You could BUY the car/person from him/herself or you could RENT him for about 40h/week.

    Now realize that there is a market for both buying cars and renting cars.

    >Pros about slave ownership
    Cheaper, long term (the salary you pay to your employee need to be enough to house/feed/clothe/entertain him anyway)
    Can't quit, so you can plan long-term.

    >Pros about labourer leasing
    No initial costs
    No loss of capital should the labourer be damaged
    Only have to pay him for the time you need him. (more work over the weekends? rent a labourer over the weekend!)

    The ability of indebted people to get out of debt
    The ability to have better control over your labourers

    Delete Post [File Only]
    Style [Yotsuba | Yotsuba B | Futaba | Burichan]