>Victory: The unit's base ability to win in a fight. Expressed as a percentage, monsters add difficulty by being a modifier to the percentage. For instance, a unit with a Victory score of 50 has a base 50/50 chance of winning a fight, but when facing a monster of 20, his chances go down to 30%.


Either I'm reading this wrong, or you're saying if a person has a higher Vic than its opponent, they'll be more likely to lose?

...That is an awesome picture. Source?

>>6091553
Read it a few more times, disregard me, I suck cocks.

Send your idea to Atlus. They turn games into win.

>And yes, I plan on eventually turning it into a computer game.
HAHAHAHAHA
HAHAHAHA
HAHA
Haaaa.

>>6091566
>>6091553
Good, I couldn't find a way to explain it aside from that, haha.

>>6091555
/tg/? ¯\(°_o)/¯

>>6091555
malakym.deviantart.com
It's by Ian McConville.
Yes, that one.

>homebrew

>>6091366
Final Fantasy Crystal Chronicles: My life as a King is already pretty much the exact game you're talking about.

Not that there isn't room for more games like it of course, but I thought you should know.

I don't like that the game play seems largely luck based. Luck if you die. Luck if you win. I don't know. Maybe some more cemented real stats that are less about percent chances and more about this stat versus that stat.

>>6091763
>I don't like that the game play seems largely luck based.

>>6091777
Yes dice rolls are luck based. But you add modifiers and other things. This is you have a 1 in 10 chance of dying. You have a 3 in 10 chance of failure. Not fun. You have a 15 in 20 chance of succeeding before adding in a +5 modifier is a little more fair.

>>6091817
..No its not. You're purposefully skewing your words. Every time you describe his system you use "You have x in y chance of dying/failure, while I have (math problem that equals x1 in y1) chance of success!"

Nevermind that he's explaining the BASE concepts, nevermind things like equipment or anything. The d20 system's base concept is "roll higher than number, or you fail."

>nerds

>>6091777
Coming from a 777GET you'd think youd be all about luck! DESU!

>>6092120
Silly Anon. All PNP games are luck based. Else they become Rock Paper Scissors.

Recently ive been thinking of how awesome a game like this would be. I love management games and love fantasy, so this idea, for me, is awesome. Whenever i thought about it, it looked alot like final fantasy tactics advance (which coincidently looks exactly like OPs pic)

Do you have a homepage link or anything so i can follow your idea, OP?

>>6092298
A homepage is FAR too organized for me. However, if you'd like to take a look at the previous thread, http://suptg.thisisnotatrueending.com/archive/5968425

And I'm on sup/tg/ chat too.

No ideas for new stats?

>>6091366
Include options for eating your party members in the event of a Donner Party scenario

/tg/ doesn't do gamism. Only simulationism.

>>6092344
Well, it's pretty difficult since with the Victory system, but you could add skills, like: Trapfinding (might cancel traps in the dungeon, cancels the effect of the trap (normally a % like that of a monster)

You could, if you're not too attached to the victory system, make the dungeons a series of encounters (like in the early FF, that is, 1-9) then make them fight these encounters, with things like traps or similar being part of the encounter

>>6092410
For my money, /tg/ does far too much gamism and not enough simulationism.

But fuck GNS, because it's just a system designed to shit on anything not N.

>>6092344

I think your stats are down, alough you could add substats for each major stat.

Victory = fighting skill, magic skill, other circumstances (terrain, etc). All three add up to the main victory percentage, or add bonuses to the base percentage.
Character equipment gives bonuses to victory, +5 sword/shield gives +5% vic or something.

As characters level up, they get access to feats. Bonuses to vic, syn, end and hp etc. chances to find additional items after adventure. You get the idea.

Equiptment/artifacts have effects attached to them. Much like feats only you have to equip weapon/armor or have artifact in possession.

I know im just reeling off generic game ideas but this is the kind of stuff that will work.

Darkstalkers: tactics would be so cool...

>>6092469
Anything that encourages morrigan porn would be cool.

Okay OP, looking at that sup/tg/ thread ive noticed the time between that and this post is 9 (10 if you're a dick). My question is, how much have you done so far? Are all of your ideas in a .txt file somewhere or do you have a basic program running etc. Do you have any programming skills?

I ask because i want to know if i should actually bother following this thread. I dont want to get really interested if its only going to die because people cant be arsed to make it happen. I dont want to be dissapointed, so if you're seriously trying to make this please do tell, otherwise tell us its only ideas in a .txt file.

>>6092496
as if Morrigan porn wasn't a self-sustaining entity already.

>>6092565
>9
9 days, lol.

>>6092577
IT IS NOT ENOUGH YET

>>6092447
Oooh, trapfinding, I like that.
Trapfinding for trap evasion
Sneaking for monster evasion
Hmm, what else.

And I really want to do a game thats less about FIGHT MAGIC ITEM RUN and more "Can I organize and customize well?", so people choosing movement and action commands isn't what I want.

>>6092458
Like Perks from the first Fallouts (Yes, they are functionally feats, but also different effects) Hmmm. I like that. Not sure I follow on the stat breakdown though. Could you explain that more?

>>6092496
There's enough porn for Darkstalkers that would run normal men dry

>>6091366
hey OP, someone already did this...

http://progressquest.com/

PS - that picture is really bitchin. I'd play a darkstalkers disgaea

>>6092666
>progressquest

Expected greatness. Received shit. Fucksake it litrally is a joke, you just watch a bar load over and over again. Thats pissed me off.

>>6092666
FUCKWIN GET

Yeah, if you just want to sit there and watch meters fill because you're a huge fucking faggot, try going back to /v/. Here in /tg/, we play games that don't sound like WORK

>>6092744
>>6092745
>Here in /tg/, we play games that don't sound like WORK

with the more vocal parts of /tg/ always looking for better ways to munchkin or having a preference for rules-heavy, bureaucratic clusterfuck systems for the sake of "simulationism", I'd say /tg/ prefers games that are WORK.

That aside, didja see some of the stuff your guy does?

placate the girl scouts?

slay porn elementals?

some of it is comedy gold.

>>6092775
You sound like you fucking love the OP, tripfag, you just want to watch a progress bar fill while you try and read what its saying.

>>6092797
you have no sense of humor.

that's why noone likes you.

>>6092745

> we play games that don't sound like WORK

Have you ever read an explanation of dorf fort by fa/tg/uys? It sounds like an elaborate babysitting spreadsheet program. I love DF, but it still ~sounds~ ridiculous if you try to give the 5-cent explanation.

>>6092816
>Have you ever read an explanation of dorf fort by fa/tg/uys? It sounds like an elaborate babysitting spreadsheet program.

that is the precise reason why I've never played DF. People's explanations of it unnerve me.

>>6092836

Once you get past the initial learning curve, its pretty fun. Then it actually becomes fun learning what yours dorfs CANT do.

>>6092836
We're gamers, not the marketing department.
Play the fucking game, it's good.

>>6092565
Oh shit, never saw this post. I'll tell you honestly. I've got a life. I don't know if this will come together. But I've got the drive to at least push it.

I'll check out FFCC.

>>6092836
The Explanation menaces with spikes of Industry.

baump