The Dwarven cleric in the party casts silence, and I say I’m initiating a grapple. We make opposed rolls, I succeed, and describe how I’m dragging her into the alley. The rest of the party stands guard at each end of the alley while I pin her, and start to describe what I’m doing in excruciating detail. The DM starts to look nervous, looking at the other players in the hopes that someone will intervene. Everyone else is just sitting there, watching.

As I start to describe how I hike her skirts up over her knees and get ready to JAM IT IN, the DM rolls, snatches up her D20, and says “She escapes”. Just one roll. The girl runs out of the alley, somehow vaulting over the Cleric and the Warblade, and runs into the crowd. Immediately, the royal guards show up to arrest me, and the DM starts to look smug, thinking that she is about to get her campaign back on the rails. Until. .

In quick succession, the other players act. The TWF Rogue sneak attacks one guard, the Cleric hits as many as he can with Mass Inflict Moderate Wounds, the Sorcerer drops an Empowered Fireball on some more, I jump into combat with a flying kick, and the Warblade downs one of the guards in one shot with one of his maneuvers. The DM is looking panicked again. As combat goes on and we don’t die, more and more guards show up. I wasn’t keeping an exact tally, but we must have gone through 20 each. The DM starts to tear up, shouts “YOU ALL DIE”, grabs my character sheet and tears it into little pieces, then runs from the room yelling about how we “DON’T UNDERSTAND HER STORY!”

So now I’m running Dark Heresy. Good end?

Yes

Maybe it's because I just started reading this tale with no prior context but you actually sound like a bit of a dick.

Not a good end, just a bad DM.
If you can't understand a DM's story or if you don't want to go along with a DM's story, that DM is a bad DM.

>>1927083
I hope she ran into the kitchen

>>1927089

http://suptg.thisisnotatrueending.com/archive/1775987/

This was the original thread.

Yup

>>1927096
Oh shit i remember that thread. You rock

>>1927083

Christ that alternates between creepy and dickish. Way to play out your rape fantasy with a room full of neckbeards.

>>1927116

Way to be an ignorant fuck.

I wouldn't call this a good end. If you don't like a campaign or you find someone hard to deal with, the mature and reasonable thing to do is to just stop playing with them. Trying to get one last jab in, or making them feel bad and destroying their campaign - no matter how miserable it was - from the inside out strikes me as meaninglessly petty.

If you were really, really good friends with this DM and the next session everyone got over it and the DM took this as a sign that things simply hadn't been working out, this could be just fine. More than likely though, you've just destroyed someone's chance of ever improving their game and enjoying roleplaying, and made yourself look like the utter height of a dickish, socially regressive jerk.

So no, not a good end, you stupid fuck. Shit game? Disucss it or leave. Good job reducing a girl to tears with your rape description though, big man.

>>1927128
1/10 for the effort.

>>1927128

Oh, and yes I did read what she did to your Paladin. Yes it was stupid, but this was still incredibly petty.

>>1927128
:3

>>1927132
ITT: The Example of Maturity

hurrrrr

>>1927096
Far too early in the morning for me to read all of that but thanks for the context. OP is now awesome.

>>1927081
FUCKING GOOD END!!!

HOORAY!

>>1927128
Petty malices are all we live for.

We all want to be the little Lawful Evil.

Meh, it's an alright end. I honestly would have waited until you encountered a Female DMPC, and then got her alone and gang banged the fuck out of her.

After disabling her so she couldn't run, of course.

Still, it was rather amusing.

>>1927140

Yeah, OP is a badass for actually going through with it and building the /tg/ Rapeguard. That the other players went along with you shows that the DM had it coming.

>>1927137

durrrrrr?

>>1927128
Its not his fault, like the DM said, "Deep down, all men just want to have sex with women, no matter what they say."

>>1927160
>Deep down, all women just want to have sex with women, no matter what they say."

Fixed.

>>1927128
Read the fucking original thread before you get all BAAWWWWWWW

This was good end for exposing hypocrisy.

>>1927170
Hnh. Kind of sexy that Catwoman is the only one wearing black.

>>1927156
yeah you should have waited for her dmpc or atleast an important npc...would have been more satisfying...

>>1927182
I could say something about the subtextual corruption of traditional Christian conventions regarding marriage, white representing purity, and the sexual activity of all those depicted...but really, isn't it obvious?

>>1927180

I read the first thread. It was retarded that she did that to the Paladin, but what is to be gained by getting everyone together to make her feel so uncomfortable that she cries? The correct response to such a situation is to just quit the game or try and reason with your DM, not to get "revenge". Getting revenge on someone because of something that happened in a roleplaying game strikes me as cruel.

She was just a shit DM.
No need to rub it in her face with a jagged brick.

>>1927193
I don't think you really belong here on /tg/...

>>1927201
>No need to rub it in her face with a jagged dick.

hohoho

>>1927193
Well, she did say that 'All men have raep in their minds."

OP just delivered unto her what she presumptuously assumed was 'natural' among men.

ITT: DM gets foot-in-mouth disease.

>>1927193

Quitting the game doesn't really send the appropriate message to the DM that she fucked up, Bad. It's not enough that someone just quits. She'll never fully realize that what she did was stupid.

In this way, the player simply acted how the DM believe that males act, and she was suddenly forced to watch her own bullshit unfold. It's like if someone says "You're a moron" all the time, then you start really acting like a moron, and then suddenly, they see "Well, shit, I guess I was wrong. And I don't want a moron hanging around me."

So shut the fuck up, moral fag.

>>1927202

4chan though this may be, this is a board for the discussion of traditional games. I like a place where I can argue as heatedly as I want about tiny differences in game lore or minor errata in rules systems, or see truly impressive and game-breaking builds meant specifically to abuse a rules system. The stories are good and there's a love of 40k.

I don't mind a little "hurr durr -4 str", but I'm not about to cheer on an obvious dick for his obviously dickish behaviour. Don't mix /b/ with /tg/.

>>1927193

I'd like you to point out where, exactly, in the story it says she cries.

>>1927220
Tearing up tends to precede crying.

>>1927220
>the DM starts to tear up

>The DM starts to tear up

>>1927220
>The DM starts to tear up, shouts “YOU ALL DIE”...

>>1927231

That's not exactly crying, and also precedes extreme frustration. However, since the whole of this thread seems to agree with you, I concede the point.

Just to clarify, she didn't actually cry, she was raging when she left, not sobbing.

Thank you OP, every time I imagine this scenario I can't help but smirk at the discomfort of the DM.

It's good to be a little evil sometimes, and for all the moralfags out there, do be quiet. This is 4chan, not the quakers.

>>1927214

"Teaching her a lesson" with hamfisted rape roleplaying? Theoretically possible, if the ones involved were cunning and clever and had a real will and desire to show her the mistakes she'd made, but let's be honest, this player did it to get back at the DM and I seriously doubt they had a heartfelt discussion afterwards about how the last few sessions have opened their eyes as to conflict they've had in a roleplaying environment.

This is the equivalent of giving someone the finger before stepping out the door. She doesn't learn anything, you just feel like you've had the last word (likely an expletive).

There are far, far too many people in this thread being reasonable, understanding people. The DM was a fucktard. The OP wasn't the only one fed up with her shit. The entire group went along with this plan, which is a pretty clear indicator that they thought she was full of shit as well.

>"Deep down, all men just want to have sex with women, no matter what they say."

She got that flipped around on her, and it was horrific, as intended. Hopefully after she wipes the moisture from her eyes she'll reevaluate that statement.

And, most importantly of all, it makes for an entertaining story.

>>1927253

Thank you for clearly and openly countering any argument of justification anyone has tried to make in this thread. It was about making someone uncomfortable for personal satisfaction, and requires no justification because those are for 'moralfags'.

In this way we are both right - I'm right that it's dickish and immature, and you're right that this is exactly the sort of thing you love.

>>1927260

I don't think she's likely to make some grand connection between what she said and this guy's revenge-rape character. Nor do I think the players involved care to try and enlighten her or use this as an example when they bring up her point about men again. If this action had been followed up by some attempt to reason with the DM and show her the error of her ways rather than high-fiving and mocking laughter, I might treat your point with consideration.

As it stands, you're just repeating "she was asking for it".

>>1927274
Well then, in that case she's a moron. If she ever comes back the OP or his party can throw out the "deep down" line to ram the point home.

And I bet you wouldn't be acting like such a bleeding heart if the DM was a dude.

>>1927296

Yeah, this anon is right. I'm getting a lot of "internet white knight"/"feminazi" vibes from this moral fag.

She asked for it, she deserves it. Just because she's a girl doesn't mean that she should be treated special.

>>1927296

exactly, if this was a dude more people would be thinking... well what the fuck did he roll?

ITT: People who didn't read the other thread and feel the need to be a morafalg anyway.

>>1927296
If it was a guy, it probobly would have ended with a punch in the teeth on the first session.

>>1927302
I keep imagining what would have happened had the DM been a guy, going "Women are there to be sexed up" and some such bullcrap.

And ironically, his DMPC is a male character, with Vow of Chastity.

>then runs from the room yelling about how we “DON’T UNDERSTAND HER STORY!”

Amazing End.

>>1927302

The classic "A female was involved, I can defeat my opponant by claiming internet white knight / feminazi status!" argument. Thank you for your reasoned and logical debate skills. Oh no, you have found me out, this whole time I was secretly trying to get into her internet-pants by arguing with you guys about why you shouldn't be an asshole to people and pretend you're setting things right.

Regardless of who the DM was, I hate the sense in this thread that what this guy did was commendable and fair, as though this were the best way to deal with the situation. It wasn't. He's an asshole. Which is fine, if you like assholes, I suppose. Cheer on his asshole behaviour, by all means! Just don't try to justify it with some floppy moral defense when all the reason you really need is "I like it when people who annoy me are emotionally crushed."

>>1927319
With my group? It would have ended in him getting a good smack across the face. Unfortunately, society says we're not allowed to give women a good smack in the mouth.

>>1927327

Internet Tuff Guy.

>>1927323
Different anon, but come on, of course he was an asshole. This doesn't change that she had it coming. And because of this, she might actually realize that being a misandrist cunt will have repercussions. And on the matter of being fair: Turn about IS fair play, isn't it? She effectively raped his last character, he and the party does so in turn.

>>1927344
Did I say I'd smack him? I'm just saying that it would have ended poorly for him.

>>1927323
The point wasn't to reform a bad DM, it was to ensure that the most people had fun. From what the OP has said, before this session the DM was having fun. During and after it, the 5 people in the party were having fun.

I say mission accomplished.

>>1927327
SOCIETY IS SO FEMINAZI THESE DAYS, I REMEMBER THE GOOD OLD DAYS WHEN MY MOMMY BEAT ME AND MY DAD RAPED MY ANUS

>>1927323
You got it. They didn't do something reasonable at all. That would have been boring. This way we all get a laugh and you get to feel all ruffled because people are sometimes bastards.

12/10

Epic end, OP.

>>1927351

If we can agree that the player was being an asshole, then this becomes the squabbling of two unpleasant people (the DM and the player) which can be taken as entertaining in and of itself.

I suppose I can agree with you there, then. They're both assholes screwing with each other, so what are we to expect from them? A bit of entertainment at most.

This is strangely agreeable. Truce reached.

To all the cockbiters in this thread siding on "maturity", that's not was this was about. This was about a feminist woman who took an incredibly smug and jaded opinion of men out of a game getting her comeuppance. It wasn't even about the rape, it was about paying someone back when it was due, with lulz as a bonus.

Since when did 4chan not approve of pissing people off for lulz and as revenge? Rapeguard, your a hero in my eyes.

>>1927323
Let's see, DM attempts to break a Paladin's Vow of Chastity by using a will-altering spell(Dominate Person) and seducing said Paladin, IGNORING his +2 save bonus due to Paladin 'attempting to do things against his nature', and giving an incredibly weak reason for this.

Now correct me if I'm wrong, but doing things AGAINST YOUR WILL would not constitute a breaking of a vow since breaking a vow entails "conscious willingness to break the vow".

I don't know, I'm a bit of a moralfag myself, but wouldn't this be...I don't know...asshole-ish behavior on the part of the DM?

>>1927376

They're both assholes. It's asshole-on-asshole crime, which I'm pretty sure is okay.

>>1927376
Congratulations on your successful thought process.

>>1927388
Since I just posted what I said when the rest of the thread agrees on asshole-on-asshole combat, correctamundo.

>>1927376

Her reason was: Deep down ALL MEN are pig disgusting. Heh, like women have no sexual pulse at all, no sir, they are all pious virgins with pure and crystalline thoughts.

She got was she deserved.

>>1927360
When she's being a misandrist, I should be allowed to throw being a gentleman out the window and smack her.

>>1927414

Because that would certainly solve the problem. Yes, lots of people have been persuaded by aggressive force that your point is more valid, it's not at all about personal satisfaction, nope.

>>1927411
I know, I bore witness to that thread when it was started. Shitsux DM.

sage for evilfag

>>1927418
You'd be surprised.

An Eye for an Eye always makes me smile, especially when it's full of irony and magificent bastardry.

As for the moralfags, I'm sure you won't stand as HIGH AND MIGHTY when it's happening to you.

You might sit around uncomfortably for a while, the urge to one-up her bubbling in your chest, and yet do nothing, burying this incident into the back of your mind for a long time. What did you gain? Nothing, except making yourself suffer in silence. What the DM learn? Nothing, except that you'll take her words in the ass and simmer like a little bitch. And she will do it again.

This might hurt people, boo-hoo, but it's interesting and funny, and in my opinion she deserves it. Take that moral faggotry and shove it where you kept the stick.

>>1927418
It serves it's purpose: Don't pull that shit again.

>>1927434
I wouldn't have been playing a paladin in the first place; that's like dressing like a whore and then complaining when you get beaten and raped in a dark alleyway.

>>1927434

"Deep down, men just want to be assholes and are unable to use the reason and self-control they profess to believe in."

Am I now justified in finding some convoluted way to drive you to tears?

As an equalitist I believe that it should be perfectly fine to smack a woman if shes willing to hit you.

However for the context of the game the player and the DM thankfully shared no physical contact, instead what we have here is the destruction of intellectual property. OP's Paladin was defiled and fallen because of the DMs skewed view on masculinity. OP managed to get her back, this is what we call a successful campaign, as the OP was capable of making the DM really feel something for the story instead of the other way around and I'm sure she'll start to think about it especially later on when shes complaining about her players.

This is a good end my moral faggotry brethren, ignoring the rape this is a tale of a DM who fucked over his character on an out of game basis and then was similarly fucked over by the player in the same way.

Even as a Moralfag, I know the sweet joys of wreaking a terrible vengeance on those who have done me wrong. I can't help but think that this is a well deserved fate and an amusing one at that. As to all the people with White Knight issues, read the other thread, being reasonable was attempted and failed. Everyone else was tired of that DM's shit. It made for an excellent read. 10/10 would recommend to a friend.

>>1927445
Deep down, people ARE assholes. That's nothing to be SHOCKED about, nor is it something to devote your life to as you devolve into an emo shitting bats.

If you want to take it up the ass all the time, well, that's just your opinion man (call it some fancy word such as RESTRAINT or SELF CONTROL if it makes you feel better), but that's not something I believe in, no.

The fact that you find it an affront to YOUR morals and a personal insult to YOU of this particularly amusing asshole-contest shows how much of a stuck-up you are. There's no violence, there's no destruction of property, and everybody but the DM comes out with a heavy weight lifted from their hearts but for one little sin. And I think it's a job well done to put a preening git into their place once in a while, whether they be a lady or a gentleman.

tl;dr NO U

>>1927446 Intellectual Property
OBJECTION!

OP, by choosing to play in his DM's game, granted implied consent for his Paladin character to rise and fall according to the arbitration of the DM; the DM was not in the wrong by way of the precedent set by Rule Zero. It is his own fault for not resolving any ambiguities in the contracts of his Paladin's code and Vow of Celibacy with the DM before the issue arose.

>>1927170

That's so true.

>>1927492 there's no destruction of property
>>1927083 grabs my character sheet and tears it into little pieces

Wrong; the DM is guilty.

>>1927509
SO she DID deserve it.

JUSTICE IS SERVED

>>1927495
I don't have no fancy image macros or book learnin's, but ain't the DM contract-shoe-alley bound to provide the players with a fun experience when they join?

Seriously, y'know, he didn't even actually get to rape anything. Compared to some of the things that were PLANNED in that thread what they actually managed to pull off was incredibly mild in comparison, and she still went batshit crazy about it.

The DM uses all "all men want to have sex with women" reasoning to make a celibate paladin fall when he didn't even want to do it, the player responds by making a blackguard that wants to have sex with women whether they want to or not. It seems perfectly reasonable to me.

well this makes me no sense , all of you crying and giving no solutions all retarded 12y old , you are just cancer , that must be cut from the root , to avoid growing up you again in our little and loved 4chan , go Google , search popular forums , post your shit there or jsut get a free webcam channel , im sure you will enjoy it fagots , the cancer makes cancer , the cancer acts like cancer , i hope this post will open your mind

>>1927515
The DM is allowed to run whatever kind of game the DM wants to run. The players are under no obligation to continue showing up at the sessions; in fact, they may pack up and leave at any time they wish during the game.

>>1927495
>DM's game
Implying ownership, the game being intellectual property, the characters being intellectual property. The game itself is the change of the property through events created by the DM and actions taken by the characters.

One such character was nullified from his position due to the DM's out of game social views, the character still served his sentence as a fallen paladin. Simply the same person created another character and altered her intellectual property in such a way she became uncomfortable and stopped the game right there.

>>1927525
Why hello thar copy pasta!

Bitch got what she deserved. Great thread.

Hmm...I was hoping you'd use the Monkadin idea:

>A monk's Unarmed Attack may be delivered with any part of their body.

>Surprise Buttsex/Flurry of Blows/Smite Evil. BOW BEFORE THE COCK OF JUSTICE!

But this is good too. Give us updates if anything else happens, okay?

>>1927528 One such character was nullified from his position due to the DM's out of game social views, the character still served his sentence as a fallen paladin.
Inside the game; however, there is nothing to stop OP from taking his character sheet, finding another game with a better DM, and playing his paladin pre-fall. The fact that the character continued on as a fallen paladin, that is to say alleged change in property, is thus NOT a result of the DM's actions, but of OP's consent to this change!

>>1927541
In the original thread, it was mentioned the the OP tried to reason with the DM, but that said DM was being unreasonable.

>>1927541
So you are saying that if a woman stays with a man who is beating her, that she is consenting to it?

Good to know.

>>1927555
And it was his decision to continue playing the game, which signaled from a rules-lawyer legalism standpoint that he accepted the ruling.

>>1927540

Will do. But I'm going to try and keep Mary Sues and catch 22s out of my Dark Heresy game, so the stories might not be as interesting.

>>1927541
But the DM, having adhered to the statement about 'men always wanting to have sex with women', should have been forewarned by the nature of the OP's character class choice.

Her inaction regarding the possible ramifications of the OP becoming an evil fallen paladin already means that the DM has consented to the inevitable scenario that the OP has created.

>>1927081
I remember reading that thread a while back. You are a fucking hero man, you've done a great thing and should feel great. Today you've struck a blow against that stupid bitch whale of a DM, today is an epic day for /tg/. Now I'm going to go celebrate with porn, heavy metal, and RPGs.

>>1927565
>rules-lawyer legalism standpoint

*facepalm*

Well obviously if he went out of his way to plot vengeance, then he didn't really find the outcome acceptable, now did he? And besides, the way in which the DM made his paladin fall was COMPLETELY out of line: Vows are only broken by will of the character, not by the circumstances pushed upon by the DM (which were completely retarded, by the way).

I don't get how people's response to this is always along the lines of "find a new DM lol". The first five years I was playing) the group of people I was playing with where the ONLY people I knew in the entire area who were into it, and I was far too shy and generally asocial to try and hang around in a hobby shop and get into games with neckbeards I didn't even know. If one of my gang had been a colossal dick then finding a new DM would have meant "we all stop hanging out of with him and then one of us DMs instead". Which is essentially what has occurred here.

>>1927570
Yes, and she is fully within her rights to run a doomed campaign.

>>1927579 Would stick by his abusive spouse.

This thread is everything that is wrong with /tg/.

>>1927587
>This thread is something that is right with /tg/.

Fix'd

>>1927599

Oh, fuck off already.

>>1927599
>This thread is everything that's right with /tg/.
Double-fixed.

>>1927600
Your annoyance is delicious. Please, keep seething.

>>1927541
Clearly both sides were within their legal rights.
I don't believe we have a case.

good ending or best ending?

>>1927611

I admire your ability to derive enjoyment from petty dickishness and the subsequent defense of dickishness. If only you could harness your infintessimally narrow mind for useful purposes, the sheer weight of your stubborn devotion to the feeble arguments offered in this thread might crush your foes as readily as it does my ability to continue to discuss this thread.

Nothing more can be gained from discussion. It's likely nothing could be gained to begin with.

>>1927625
He did good, we're all very proud of /tg/'s infamous rapeguard.

However if this was the BBEG seductress bitch, and he shoved that bitch on a leash and forced her to be fucked through and through and sold off into slavery, that might of been more interesting. Especially if the DM kept her ending the same and went "FUCK YOU ALL DIE D=<"

>>1927628


Hey man, I tried to settle this thing back with >>1927365. If the Rapeguard guys hadn't been so busy dickwaving about how much she "deserved it" and how much the OP was a hero, we might have been able to settle this thing amicably. It's pretty clear at this point they don't actually want to come to an agreement.

>>1927628
what the fuck are you doing on 4chan dumbass? GTFO

>>1927640

You GTFO. I'm content to troll you sons of bitches as long as I want.

>>1927128
>>1927132

you fail at life. kill yourself

>>1927650

NO U

>>1927645
I don't think you are trolling. We're all getting epic lulz from you getting pissed off, I believe it is in fact you who are getting trolled.

>>1927628

>>1927655

You can see me with your magic internet goggles? Oh no! My darkest secrets of getting worked up over an internet argument have been revealed! You have caught me, anon.

>>1927655

>>1927655

>epic lulz

Fuck the summer.

>>1927132
>>1927628
>>1927660
>>1927645
all different posters, all trolls

>>1927660
ZE GOGGLES ZEY DO NOTHING!!!!!

>>1927672

samefag

>>1927660
See what I mean. Even that post sounded like you were angry. Do everyone a favor and just GTFO. Fail troll is fail.

>>1927673
Misquote. Why can nobody get this quote right?

>>1927687

No wait, he might be on to something. Fail troll is more annoying than successful troll, especially if he keeps hammering on with his shitty moralfag trolling long after we lose interest.

Could be some sort of... meta-troll?

>>1927696

No, I just hate this ridiculous notion that Rapeguard did something commendable and isn't just another asshole being an asshole, and I'm sick of you guys sucking him off like he's the hero of the hour.

>>1927705

Hoho, nice try, meta-troll. You'll have to do better than that!

>>1927708

Fuck off.

>>1927696
I always thought it was fun to scream out you activated my trap card then slam it down with two fingers.

>>1927708
Watch what you say. We may encourage him to try and reach higher. I don't know if /tg/ can contain the power of a meta-meta-troll.

Congratulations. Now she actually has reason to believe you've confirmed her dumbass opinion of all men. Way to go, jackass.

Next time, the way to handle shitty DMs is not playing in their games.

>>1927726
Well, not playing in their games is a good idea if you're too much of a passive-aggressive cowardly fuck to actually talk to them about it, that is.

>>1927726

*Thank you* for restoring some sliver of faith in the /tg/ community.

>>1927705
Welcome to the internet - where being an asshole IS commendable, if you do it with style.

>>1927705
I see you're cunning plan. I give you 9/10 quite a good troll but I lol'd at you the whole time so I hope it was fun for you to.

>>1927726
She's a dumbass, nobody cared about her opinion.
What matters is that JUSTICE IS SERVED and REVENGE IS SWEET.

>>1927726
She's a female, she's already "confirmed" her opinion well past the reach of rational persuasion. Once a women's turned feminist there's no way to save her, so you might as well have some fun.

>>1927739
If nobody cared, there wouldn't be all this whining about how terrible her DMing is and how her opinions are persecuting everyone with a penis, and therefore nothing to get revenge for.

>>1927418
You'd be surprised how much violence convinces people the one winning is right.

Rapeguard wins. All the people who don't like it - avoid pushing the button to make the paladin fail, and we'll not need to see any more Rapeguards.

>>1927760
It's mostly women who AREN'T feminists who go around saying things like "all men want is sex."

Dumbass.

>>1927793
The concept of the man-hating feminist has always seen so painfully archaic to me. You can't take people who bring it up seriously, because it's as relevant today as accusing people of being subversive communist sympathizers because they listen to the Beatles.

Morons like that are 40 years out of date.

>>1927829 is feminist propaganda victim

This thread is depressing. OP's actions are embarrassing.

OP did the right thing. /thread

>>1927840
>This thread is uplifting. OP's actions are uplifting.

I'm sure you just made a mistake when you typed. Fixed it to reflect your true thoughts.

OP did the right thing given the circumstances.

OP and his DM are both bad people, and should feel bad.

So just to clarify...

DM character rapes PC character AND removes all his class features, justification being all male characters secretly want to have sex with women. PC rapes NPC justification being all male characters secretly want to have sex with women and you think he's being an asshole.

Sure, he did it only to piss her off, but it shows her hypocrocy as well as the biggoted nature of her statements. I consider it an ironic and just comeuppence. Karmic, even.

This thread is full of trolling and no one here really means what they say. I bet half the people who say they agree with Rapeguard actually don't and are just saying it to stir controversy, while half the people who disagree with him think the same way.

ITT: Lies.

>>1927915 ITT: Lies.

>>1927915
Ah, goddamnit, watch where you point that paradox, will ya?

>>1927726

>>Congratulations. Now she actually has reason to believe you've confirmed her dumbass opinion of all men.

And he should care about what she thinks of men because...? Oh wait, you were hoping to bang her !

WELL SORRY ABOUT THAT

>>1927926
That's no cake! That's a brownie in disguise!

>>1927975
If he didn't care what she thinks of men, wtf was he whining about to begin with?

>>1927982
Because she pulled some dumb and insulting shit last time and "MADE" his paladin fall.

DID YOU EVEN READ THE OTHER THREAD?

>>1927982
Losing all his paladin abilities because she was a misandrist cunt.

>>1927081
Well played OP, well played.
(Stands and starts a slow clapping, waiting for thunderous applause...)

>>1927323
Get the hell out of here. You don't belong here.

Bravo OP
Anyone who says that wasnt awesome is a troll

>>1927525
I lol'd

OP, double WIN for the story and annoy half (or 3/4) of /tg/

Honestly, I hate GMs who try to police the plot. If they have to police the plot that much why bother playing a game where there are multiple choices of action and free will?

>>1927081
>>1927082
>>1927083

>>1927095

This is today's best post on /tg/

>>1928373
very yes

>>1927083
This thread is awesome and you should feel awesome.

Wow, you really, REALLY need the context of that last thread to appreciate this. There's just no other way.

You did good though, you did good.

What he did was awesome and all, but Christ, I thought only /b/ still bitched and moaned about "moralfaggotry."

Get it together, /tg/.

>>1928437
>BAWWWWWW Not everybody likes my post

>>1928403
not everything ends in "us" namefag. lrn2latin

>>1928447
My FIRST post? The one you just quoted?

>After /v/ they come for me. After /v/ they come for me.

People, you aren't seeing the big picture here (I'm not surprised that /tg/ can't pick up on subtlety though):

She allowed him to use feats from the Book of Exalted Deeds. She deserved everything just for that.

>>1928460
Fuck off, ever seen the sorry excuse for Latin that 40k uses?

THAT'S THE JOKE!

>>1928494
He didn't have a Vow of Chastity feat, his paladin just had a fluff vow of chastity. No in-game effect. Unless you meant something else I didn't notice.

>>1928494
I don't think he actually had the feat Vow of Chastity. I think he just had a Vow of Chastity, without any bonuses. Y'know, just for roleplay's sake?

>>1928494
I thought it was that she punched the "Corrupt Paladin" and "Rape" button simultaneously, bypassing the security lock on a PC shit-tempest.

OP has restored my faith in my fellow men.
Seriously all the 'moralfags' here are just whining little submissive pricks whose master didn't feed them scraps today.

>>1928505
>>1928504
Hivemind

>>1928502
And now you are a proponent of said joke. Good day to you, Inquisitor Fail.

>>1928515
You don't understand parody, do you?

>>1928517
I purge what i do not care to look at. And one of the things i care to not look at is horrible namefag names. Satirical, or otherwise.

>>1927323
The best way to deal with the situation? Certainly not.

Fucking hilarious? Yes. Very yes.

Well done sir Rapeguard, well done.
I applaud your efforts at destroying the will of a poor D.M. it was not her place to change your character, but you ran well with it.
You are an inspiration to us all. Bravo.

>>1928529
Well, isn't that a shame.

I was somehow hoping for the character to become MOTHERFUCKING PYRAMIDHEAD BLACKGUARD RAPING LIKE THE FIST OF THE NORTH STAR JESUS CHRIST but this works too
I do, however, have a new BBEG now.

Motherfucking brilliant, Rapeguard.

Rapeguard wins! THIS was true justice.

Sometimes I get the impression that all the fags defending her (or, at least, saying OP was an asshole) are doing it because themselves are shitty DMs and are uneasy with one of their kind facing punishment.

>>1928646
this.

>>1928646
Agreed, trouble is, none of them would ever admit to it, so we've gotta settle with labeling them as Moralfags

>>1928672
but thats an insult to non-cowardly moralfags everywhere, no matter how messed up their priorities are

>>1928672
Moralfag as an insult confuses me. I'm sure most people here are, in the grand scheme of things, pretty moral.

>>1928672

yeah, that kinda sucks.

I'm a bit of a moralfag myself, I know it, but this situation... The bitch got exactly what she deserved, no more, no less. True justice in action for once, it's nice to witness. I just can't see why someone would feel concerned all call OP an ass if not by feeling targeted a bit.

ALL HAIL RAPEGUARD!!!! HERO OF TG!!!

>>1928739

That works really well with OPs pic.

This thread is why WotC won't allow 4th edition Paladins to fall.

>>1928739

>>1927096
Oh wait, you're that guy?

Well done sir. I remember raging incredibly at your original thread. Congratulations.

>>1928933

so say we all.

Holy shit! You actually did it! You are an asshole, and you should feel good!
Enjoy your Dark Heresy!