WOW U R SOOOO DEEP!!1
You should totally be, like, a senator, or something!
Seriously, stop being a little emo faggot.
>I meant that the act of saving one set of people only for others to die as an indirect result is a morally grey area.
>Curing cancer makes others die.
We can produce more food/acre than ever before.
Starvation due to overpopulation is not the issue, and NEVER will be, in civilized countries.
In uncivilized countries, they ALREADY have starvation due to overpopulation, and few people are dying of cancer.
Look up "farm towers", too.
The only possible downside to overpopulation is a ridiculous crime rate, and increasingly more homosexuals, which would actually DAMPER the growing population.
Hell, many advanced countries, such as China, Japan, U.K., are at the VERY BOTTOM of the birth-rate chart, while all those shitty, poor-as-fuck, scrabbling-in-the-dirt-for-food countries are producing as many as FIVE TIMES MORE CHILDREN, per woman!
You think that saving some people from a lingering, agonizing death is going to change anything about this?
That those countries where children are born, and die of malnutrition a few months later are suddenly going to get WORSE?
Fuck you, and fuck your sixth-grader logic.